Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Super resonance: Breaking the bandwidth limit of resonant modes and its application to flow control

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A coiled phononic subsurface sustains out-of-phase resonance over a band five times wider than its uncoiled counterpart, passively suppressing four flow instabilities simultaneously across the entire unstable frequency range at Reynolds num

desk verdict A credible engineering result with an oversold 'super resonance' label; the main soft spot is the uniform F/4 forcing assumption that both the FRF and DNS rely on. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.15142 v4 pith:NX5SR5DN submitted 2025-09-18 physics.flu-dyn

Adam R. Harris , Armin Kianfar , David Roca , Daniel Yago , Christoph Brehm , Mahmoud I. Hussein This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords superresonancephononicsubsurfaceflowcontrollocallyresonantmetamaterialcoiledcrystalbandwidthbroadeninglaminar-to-turbulenttransitionpassivestabilization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims to have discovered a new resonance regime, called super resonance, in which a vibrational mode keeps its out-of-phase response over a frequency band far wider than its classical bandwidth. The effect is realized in a coiled phononic subsurface: a locally resonant elastic metamaterial folded so that several internal energy pathways converge at the single location that touches the flow. Because the out-of-phase band is widened, the structure can passively cancel unstable flow perturbations across a broad frequency window, not just at one narrow tone. In direct numerical simulations of a channel flow at Reynolds number 7500, the coiled subsurface suppresses all four unstable perturbation modes spanning the entire unstable region, where an uncoiled equivalent would destabilize some of them. If correct, this turns a longstanding narrowband limitation of resonance-based flow control into a broadband, passive capability.

What carries the argument

The key mechanism is a rotationally locked coiled phononic subsurface: a finite locally resonant metamaterial folded into 180-degree turns that preserve the phonon band structure while bringing multiple structural locations into contact with a single small flow-control region. The flow excites each flow-facing junction with equal force, and the total structural response is the complex superposition of transfer functions between all excited and responding junctions. That superposition reconstructs the mode at the flow interface, widening the band over which the response stays out of phase; the performance metric P (the amplitude–phase product at the interface) then dictates whether a given pe

What would settle it

Measure the displacement at each of the four junctions separately in a coupled DNS or experiment with a single-frequency forcing: if the total response is not the equal-weight superposition of the individual junction transfer functions, the super-resonance broadening collapses to the uncoiled bandwidth. Alternatively, run the offline frequency response with only one junction excited (force F, not F/4, at a single junction): the out-of-phase band should reduce to the conventional narrow band; if it does not, the broadening is not due to the multi-pathway superposition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a mode's out-of-phase response can be made to persist far beyond its classical bandwidth by architected spatial convergence of multiple internal energy pathways. In the coiled PSub with three coiling cycles, four flow-facing junctions are each excited by a quarter of the flow force, and the total response is the superposition of the sixteen transfer functions among them. This superposition shifts the first anti-resonance after the 278 Hz target resonance from 555 Hz to 826 Hz, doubling the out-of-phase band, and the onward quasi-super-resonant extension reaches 1737 Hz—more than five times the uncoiled out-of-phase bandwidth. In the coupled DNS, the structure st

Load-bearing premise

The largest load-bearing assumption is that the flow's pressure excites each of the four flow-facing junctions with exactly one-quarter of the force and that the junctions' responses simply add as linear, uncoupled transfer functions; if the coiled structure couples the junctions through bending or rotation at the locks, or if the pressure is not uniform over the small control region, the predicted fivefold broadening and the simultaneous suppression of all four instabilities

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Passive stabilization across the entire unstable frequency band of a channel flow at a given Reynolds number, demonstrated by DNS for four discrete frequencies spanning the complete unstable window.
  • The out-of-phase bandwidth and the resulting stabilization bandwidth are more than five times those of an equivalent uncoiled PSub, and destabilization windows in the 250–1500 Hz range are eliminated.
  • The coiled design reduces the total height of the structure beneath the surface, which is advantageous for practical installation.
  • Integration with downstream-control PSub concepts should allow tunable, robust delay of laminar-to-turbulent transition in channel and boundary-layer flows.
  • The concept suggests a pathway toward controlling fully developed turbulent flows, whose broadband disturbance spectrum has resisted conventional narrowband resonators.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If super resonance is a general property of spatially convergent multi-pathway resonators, the same coiling-and-superposition principle could broaden the usable phase bandwidth of other resonator types (acoustic, electromagnetic, mechanical), enabling broadband noise suppression or vibration control beyond phononic subsurfaces.
  • The mechanism predicts a specific scaling: the out-of-phase bandwidth should grow with the number of converged junctions (coiling cycles) until the next anti-resonance intervenes; testing two versus three versus four coiling cycles would reveal whether the broadening saturates as expected.
  • The superposition assumption implies that the flow must excite all junctions with equal coherence; in a real turbulent boundary layer, pressure fluctuations may be only partially correlated across the control region, so the effective broadening could be smaller than in the idealized DNS—an experimental test with separate pressure measurements at each junction would clarify.
  • The extended FIK identity with wall-transpiration terms derived in the paper could be reused to evaluate other wall-based control schemes, such as active blowing or suction, in spatially developing channel flows.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes 'super resonance,' a regime in which a structural mode's out-of-phase frequency response persists over a band several times wider than the classical resonance bandwidth. The mechanism is realized by coiling a locally resonant elastic metamaterial so that multiple flow-facing junctions converge to a single effective flow interface; the frequency response is computed by superimposing the transfer functions among these junctions under an equal force partition. The authors then perform direct numerical simulations of a channel flow at Re=7500 with a 3-cycle coiled PSub, reporting simultaneous stabilization of four Tollmien–Schlichting modes spanning 600–750 Hz and a skin-friction reduction via FIK analysis. The central claim is that the coiled PSub's out-of-phase band is more than five times wider than that of the uncoiled structure, enabling broadband passive flow control.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work would offer a practical route to broadband passive stabilization of flow instabilities, which is a long-standing limitation of resonance-based flow control. The manuscript includes a complete design pipeline—homogenization, machine-learning inverse design, band-structure preservation via rotational locking, and DNS—and the four individual TS-mode DNS cases are internally consistent with the sign of the performance metric. However, the core phenomenon is derived from a linear superposition ansatz whose key assumption (uniform and equal F/4 force partition across the flow-facing junctions) is not independently validated; the DNS reimposes the same ansatz, so the simulations do not provide a test of the mechanism. As a design/engineering concept the approach is interesting, but the evidence presented does not yet support the stronger claim of a new fundamental resonant regime.

major comments (3)
  1. [Coiled PSub response characteristics; Broadband flow stabilization (Fig. 2, Appendix A1)] The equal force partition F/4 and the linear superposition of transfer functions are load-bearing assumptions for both the offline FRF and the DNS coupling. The justification given in the text is that the four flow-facing junctions lie in a small control region compared to the perturbation wavelength. This does not hold quantitatively: the control region spans x=8 to 9.6, i.e., 1.6δ, while the TS wavelength is ≈4.1 mm ≈6.3δ. The control region is therefore ≈0.25 wavelengths long, meaning the TS wall-pressure amplitude and phase vary by roughly 90° across the junctions. A uniform, equal-phase F/4 loading is a strong idealization; if the actual pressure distribution is non-uniform or phase-shifted, the cancellation of anti-resonances that produces the quasi-super-resonant band may not occur. No sensitivity study is presented. Since this assumption is used both in the FRF and in the DNS, th
  2. [Broadband flow stabilization; Appendix A1] The DNS does not independently validate the super-resonance mechanism because it uses the same reduced-order structural model and the same F/4 direct superposition as the offline analysis. In the coupled simulation, the flow pressure is converted to a single forcing value, divided equally among the four junctions, and the PSub response is obtained by direct superposition of the same transfer functions. Thus, the agreement between Fig. 3b and Fig. 3c is a consistency check of the model, not a prediction that would fail if the superposition assumption were wrong. A true test would require either a fully 3D structural model or at least applying the actual instantaneous wall-pressure distribution from the DNS to each junction without pre-imposing equal sharing.
  3. [Fig. 2; Coiled PSub response characteristics; footnote [57]] The comparison between the uncoiled (0 cycles) and 3-cycle coiled PSub changes two variables simultaneously: the topology and the number of flow-interfacing ports (1 vs 4). The off-line FRF for the uncoiled case is a single input/single output transfer function, while the 3-cycle case superimposes 16 transfer functions with four inputs and four outputs. The manuscript's own footnote [57] states that the broadening is 'enabled by the superposition of the transfer functions.' Without a control case using an uncoiled rod excited and measured at four points with the same equal-force partition, the observed broadening cannot be attributed to the coiled architecture as opposed to simply having more input/output channels. A control calculation of this type is needed to support the claim that coiling specifically breaks the bandwidth limit.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors and OCR-like artifacts, e.g., 'Naiver-Stokes,' 'demonstraed' in the Fig. 2 caption, 'approppriately,' and 'incorprate' in Appendix A1. The figure captions also contain garbled symbols such as 'g17' and 'g68' and '/g71' that should be cleaned up.
  2. [Fig. 3c] The left and right axes in Fig. 3c are not distinguished in the caption; please state clearly which curves use the right axis (the 'All Modes' case) and how the ordinates are normalized.
  3. [Coiled PSub response characteristics] The phrase 'These points are confined within a small control region along the streamwise direction compared to the perturbation wavelength(s)' should be quantified. As noted in the major comments, the actual ratio is ≈0.25, which is not 'small' in the usual asymptotic sense.
  4. [Super resonance] The distinction between 'super resonance' and 'quasi-super resonance' is not crisply defined. The quasi-super region is described as 'effectively contiguous' and 'practically' exhibiting super-resonance, but the phase plot should be shown with explicit criteria for what constitutes contiguous out-of-phase behavior.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Super-resonance broadening and DNS stabilization both rely on the same F/4 equal-forcing/superposition ansatz; the DNS thus confirms an input rather than independently testing the broadband phase.

  1. self definitional [Results and Discussion, 'Broadband flow stabilization' (main text); compare 'Coiled PSub response characteristics']
    "In this case of 3 coiling cycles, the PSub has 4 points of contact with the flow, thus the pressure-induced force exerted by the flow on each contact junction is F/4. The combined (superposed) PSub’s temporal response is then obtained by direct superposition, similar to the offline frequency-domain PSub characterization analysis described earlier."

    The offline FRF that defines the quasi-super-resonant broadband out-of-phase band was constructed by exciting Junctions 1, 3, 5, 7 each with F/4 and superimposing all 16 transfer functions (η_int = Σ_i η_i). The DNS imposes exactly the same equal-force plus direct-superposition rule as the fluid-structure boundary condition. Therefore the broadband out-of-phase phase that produces stabilization is an input to the coupled simulation, not an output of it; the agreement between the performance metric in Fig. 3b and the DNS stabilization in Fig. 3c is a consistency check between two implementations of the same ansatz. The claim that each of the four junction forces is F/4 is an assumption justified only by the statement that the control region is 'small' compared to the perturbation wavelength

full rationale

The paper's main derivation chain is: (i) coiling with rotational locking preserves the dispersion relation (supported both by ref. [45] and by the paper's own Fig. A2), (ii) the FRF of the 3-cycle coiled PSub is obtained by exciting Junctions 1, 3, 5, 7 equally with F/4 and superimposing the 16 transfer functions, which yields a broad out-of-phase band, and (iii) DNS of the channel flow with this PSub shows stabilization of the four TS modes. The first step is not circular: although ref. [45] is a self-citation, the paper includes an independent band-structure computation in Appendix A2. The second step is a definition/superposition rule: the broad phase plateau is a mathematical consequence of summing the chosen transfer functions. The circularity enters at step (iii): the DNS imposes the same F/4 equal-forcing and direct-superposition construction that generated the offline performance metric, so the predicted stabilization is substantially built into the model chain. The paper's justification that the four junctions are 'effectively perceived as a single response point' is an unvalidated assumption about the TS pressure distribution across a 1.6δ control region (about a quarter of a TS wavelength) and is not derived from the flow solution. Thus the claim that super resonance passively suppresses four unstable flow perturbations is partially a restatement of the boundary condition chosen for the structural model. No fitting-to-data circularity or load-bearing self-citation was found; the genuine Navier-Stokes solution for the prescribed transpiration is a real simulation, which prevents the circularity from being total. Score 6 reflects that the central broadband-stabilization prediction reduces in part to the same constructed input in both the offline FRF and the DNS.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a chain of modeling choices: the coiling protocol, the superposition ansatz for multi-junction excitation, the homogenized rod representation, and the inverse-designed effective properties. None of these is validated against an external experiment or benchmark; the free parameters are chosen or fitted to produce the desired broadband performance.

free parameters (5)
  • Effective rod properties (E_eff, rho_eff) = 0.2 GPa, 450 kg/m3
    Target values chosen to produce the desired performance-metric landscape; inverse design (GA/DNN) fits geometric parameters to achieve them.
  • Resonator frequencies f_res,1 and f_res,2 = 5000 Hz and 20000 Hz
    Set by tuning resonator masses to 3x and 5x base mass; these are design choices driving the FRF shape.
  • Damping constants q1 and q2 = q1=0, q2=6e-8
    Chosen to match the intended response; no experimental calibration shown.
  • Number of coiling cycles = 3
    Selected because super-resonant behavior emerges at three cycles; this is a hand-picked design parameter.
  • Frequencies of the four TS modes = 600, 650, 700, 750 Hz
    Selected to span the unstable band at Re=7500; the design is tuned to be stable there.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Rotational locking fully preserves the phonon band structure of the uncoiled configuration
    Taken from Ref [45] (same group) and assumed for the PSub; Fig A2 shows dispersion comparison for a two-cell model, but the claim 'exactly identical' is for the specific geometry.
  • ad hoc to paper The 1D rod with effective properties represents the 3D coiled PSub within 2% deviation
    Homogenization + DNN inverse design; no experimental validation, deviation estimate from the surrogate model.
  • domain assumption The flow perceives the multiple junctions as a single response point
    Control region length (about 1.6 delta) is small compared to TS wavelength (about 4.1 mm); the paper assumes the transpiration velocity is the sum of junction responses.
  • ad hoc to paper Linear superposition of transfer functions with equal force partition represents the coupled FSI
    The FRF is constructed by imposing F/4 at each junction and summing responses; the DNS uses the same partition, making the coupled result partly an input.
  • standard math Orr-Sommerfeld linear stability theory governs the TS modes
    Standard for channel flow stability; used to select the four modes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Super resonance: Breaking the bandwidth limit of resonant modes and its application to flow control." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NX5SR5DN

@misc{pith2026250915142,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Super resonance: Breaking the bandwidth limit of resonant modes and its application to flow control},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NX5SR5DN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.15142}
}
read the original abstract

We report the discovery of super resonance--a new regime of resonant behavior in which a mode's out-of-phase response persists far beyond its classical bandwidth. This effect emerges from a coiled phononic structure composed of a locally resonant elastic metamaterial and architected to support multiple internal energy pathways. These pathways converge at a single structural location, enabling extended modal dominance and significantly broadening the frequency range over which a resonant phase is sustained. We demonstrate by direct numerical simulations the implications of this mechanism in the context of flow instability control, where current approaches are inherently constrained by the characteristically narrow spectral bandwidth of conventional resonances. Using a super-resonant phononic subsurface structure interfacing with a channel flow, we show passive simultaneous suppression of four unstable flow perturbations across a frequency range more than five times wider than that is achievable with a standard resonance in an equivalent uncoiled structure. By enabling broadband, passive control of flow instabilities, super resonance overcomes a longstanding limitation in laminar flow control strategies. More broadly, it introduces a powerful new tool for phase-engineered wave-matter interaction. The ability to preserve out-of-phase modal response across wide spectral ranges establishes a fundamental advance in the physics of resonance, with far-reaching implications for suppressing fully developed turbulent flows and beyond.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.15142 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: b. This plot demonstrates the quantified “perturbation enhancement” to friction based on the second term in Eq. (1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Phonon-mediated stabilization of first and second modes in hypersonic boundary-layer flows

    physics.flu-dyn 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Phonon engineering is proposed to control both first and second modes in hypersonic boundary layers via tailored wall fluctuations for drag reduction.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [57]

    It should be noted that without the described multiple structural connectivity to the flow, the coiled PSub will yield an identical FRF as its uncoiled counterpart. The sole purpose of the coiling is primarily to enable the geometric convergence of the multi- ple junctions to a specific point in space, namely the point that interfaces with the flow. The b...

  2. [1]

    Lagrange,Mécanique Analytique(Chez la Veuve Desaint, Paris, 1788)

    J.-L. Lagrange,Mécanique Analytique(Chez la Veuve Desaint, Paris, 1788)

  3. [2]

    M. Born, W. Heisenberg, and P. Jordan, Zur quantenmechanik ii, Zeitschrift für Physik35, 557 (1926)

    1926

  4. [3]

    P. A. M. Dirac, The quantum theory of the emission and absorp- tion of radiation, Proceedings of the Royal Society A114, 243 (1927)

    1927

  5. [4]

    R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands,The Feynman Lectures on Physics, V ol. 3: Quantum Mechanics(Addison- Wesley, 1965) see Chapter 2 for harmonic oscillator in quantum mechanics

    1965

  6. [5]

    N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin,Solid State Physics(Saun- ders College, 1976)

    1976

  7. [6]

    Gad-el Hak, A

    M. Gad-el Hak, A. Pollard, and J.-P. Bonnet,Flow control: Fundamentals and practices, V ol. 53 (Springer Science & Busi- ness Media, 2003)

    2003

  8. [7]

    Tiainen, A

    J. Tiainen, A. Grönman, A. Jaatinen-Värri, and J. Backman, Flow control methods and their applicability in low-Reynolds- number centrifugal compressors—A review, International Jour- nal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power3, 2 (2017)

    2017

Show all 73 references
  1. [8]

    M. V . Morkovin, On the many faces of transition, inViscous Drag Reduction: Proceedings of the Symposium on Viscous Drag Reduction held at the LTV Research Center , Dallas, Texas, September 24 and 25, 1968(Springer, 1969) pp. 1–31

    1968

  2. [9]

    Schlichting and K

    H. Schlichting and K. Gersten,Boundary-layer theory (Springer, 2016)

    2016

  3. [10]

    R. W. Milling, Tollmien–Schlichting wave cancellation, The Physics of Fluids24, 979 (1981)

    1981

  4. [11]

    Liepmann, G

    H. Liepmann, G. Brown, and D. Nosenchuck, Control of laminar-instability waves using a new technique, Journal of Fluid Mechanics118, 187 (1982)

    1982

  5. [12]

    Liepmann and D

    H. Liepmann and D. Nosenchuck, Active control of laminar- turbulent transition, Journal of Fluid Mechanics118, 201 (1982)

    1982

  6. [13]

    A. S. Thomas, The control of boundary-layer transition using a wave-superposition principle, Journal of Fluid Mechanics137, 233 (1983)

    1983

  7. [14]

    R. D. Joslin, R. A. Nicolaides, G. Erlebacher, M. Y . Hussaini, and M. D. Gunzburger, Active control of boundary-layer insta- bilities: Use of sensors and spectral controller, AIAA Journal 33, 1521 (1995)

    1995

  8. [15]

    Grundmann and C

    S. Grundmann and C. Tropea, Active cancellation of artificially introduced Tollmien—Schlichting waves using plasma actua- tors, Experiments in Fluids44, 795 (2008)

    2008

  9. [16]

    Amitay, B

    M. Amitay, B. A. Tuna, and H. Dell’Orso, Identification and mitigation of T-S waves using localized dynamic surface modi- fication, Physics of Fluids28, 064103 (2016)

    2016

  10. [17]

    H. H. Hu and H. H. Bau, Feedback control to delay or advance linear loss of stability in planar poiseuille flow, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Phys- ical Sciences447, 299 (1994)

    1994

  11. [18]

    T. R. Bewley and S. Liu, Optimal and robust control and esti- mation of linear paths to transition, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 365, 305 (1998)

    1998

  12. [19]

    M. I. Hussein, S. Biringen, O. R. Bilal, and A. Kucala, Flow stabilization by subsurface phonons, Proceedings of the Royal Society A471, 20140928 (2015)

    2015

  13. [20]

    B. L. Davis, A. S. Tomchek, E. A. Flores, L. Liu, and M. I. Hussein, Analysis of periodicity termination in phononic crys- tals, inASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, V ol. 8 (2011) pp. 973–977

    2011

  14. [21]

    H. B. Al Ba’ba’a, C. L. Willey, V . W. Chen, A. T. Juhl, and M. Nouh, Theory of truncation resonances in continuum rod- based phononic crystals with generally asymmetric unit cells, Advanced Theory and Simulations6, 2200700 (2023)

    2023

  15. [22]

    M. I. Rosa, B. L. Davis, L. Liu, M. Ruzzene, and M. I. Hus- sein, Material vs. structure: Topological origins of band-gap truncation resonances in periodic structures, Physical Review Materials7, 124201 (2023)

    2023

  16. [23]

    P. A. Deymier,Acoustic metamaterials and phononic crystals, V ol. 173 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    2013

  17. [24]

    M. I. Hussein, M. J. Leamy, and M. Ruzzene, Dynamics of phononic materials and structures: Historical origins, recent progress, and future outlook, Applied Mechanics Reviews66 (2014)

    2014

  18. [25]

    A. S. Phani and M. I. Hussein, Introduction to lattice materi- als, inDynamics of Lattice Materials(John Wiley & Sons, Ltd,

  19. [26]

    Y . Jin, Y . Pennec, B. Bonello, H. Honarvar, L. Dobrzynski, B. Djafari-Rouhani, and M. I. Hussein, Physics of surface vi- brational resonances: pillared phononic crystals, metamaterials, and metasurfaces, Reports on Progress in Physics84, 086502 (2021)

    2021

  20. [27]

    C. J. Barnes, C. L. Willey, K. Rosenberg, A. Medina, and A. T. Juhl, Initial computational investigation toward passive transi- tion delay using a phononic subsurface, inAIAA SciTech 2021 F orum(2021) p. 1454

    2021

  21. [28]

    Kianfar and M

    A. Kianfar and M. I. Hussein, Phononic-subsurface flow stabi- lization by subwavelength locally resonant metamaterials, New Journal of Physics25, 053021 (2023)

    2023

  22. [29]

    Michelis, A

    T. Michelis, A. Putranto, and M. Kotsonis, Attenuation of Tollmien–Schlichting waves using resonating surface- embedded phononic crystals, Physics of Fluids35, 044101 (2023)

    2023

  23. [30]

    Schmidt, H

    R. Schmidt, H. Yousef, I. Roy, C. Scalo, and M. Nouh, Pertur- bation energy extraction from a fluid via a subsurface acoustic diode with sustained downstream attenuation, Journal of Ap- plied Physics137, 054901 (2025)

    2025

  24. [31]

    Kianfar and M

    A. Kianfar and M. I. Hussein, Local flow control by phononic subsurfaces over extended spatial domains, Journal of Applied 17 Physics134, 094701 (2023)

    2023

  25. [32]

    C. L. Willey, C. J. Barnes, V . W. Chen, K. Rosenberg, A. Med- ina, and A. T. Juhl, Multi-input multi-output phononic subsur- faces for passive boundary layer transition delay, Journal of Flu- ids and Structures121, 103936 (2023)

    2023

  26. [33]

    M. I. Hussein, D. Roca, A. R. Harris, and A. Kianfar, Scatterless interferences: Delay of laminar-to-turbulent flow transition by a lattice of subsurface phonons, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.18835 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  27. [34]

    C. W. Klauss, V . Russo, M. I. Hussein, and C. Brehm, Explo- ration of phononic subsurfaces for hypersonic boundary layer disturbance reduction, inAIAA Aviation F orum and ASCEND 2025(2025) p. 3455

    2025

  28. [35]

    D. D. Wiberg, S. Park, V . Ramakrishnan, T. Saxton-Fox, K. H. Matlack, and P. J. Ansell, One-way coupling of surface vibra- tion and kármán vortex street instability, inAIAA Aviation F o- rum and ASCEND 2025(2025) p. 3252

    2025

  29. [36]

    Michelis, C

    T. Michelis, C. De Koning, and M. Kotsonis, On the inter- action of Tollmien–Schlichting waves with a wall-embedded Helmholtz resonator, Physics of Fluids35, 034104 (2023)

    2023

  30. [37]

    R. Zhao, C. Wen, Y . Zhou, G. Tu, and J. Lei, Review of acous- tic metasurfaces for hypersonic boundary layer stabilization, Progress in Aerospace Sciences130, 100808 (2022)

    2022

  31. [38]

    Yet it remains fundamentally a conventional resonance subject to the same narrowband limitations described above

    A band-gap truncation resonance may exhibit a modestly broader out-of-phase bandwidth than a standard structural res- onance—particularly when the band gap is wide [28]. Yet it remains fundamentally a conventional resonance subject to the same narrowband limitations described above

  32. [39]

    These instability bands depend on the Reynolds numberReand can be predicteda priorithrough linear stability analysis [27, 72, 73]

  33. [40]

    Tolstoy, Superresonant systems of scatterers

    I. Tolstoy, Superresonant systems of scatterers. i, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America80, 282 (1986)

    1986

  34. [41]

    J. A. Gordon and R. W. Ziolkowski, The design and simulated performance of a coated nano-particle laser, Optics Express15, 2622 (2007)

    2007

  35. [42]

    M. V . Rybin, K. L. Koshelev, Z. F. Sadrieva, K. B. Samusev, A. A. Bogdanov, M. F. Limonov, and Y . S. Kivshar, High-q su- percavity modes in subwavelength dielectric resonators, Physi- cal review letters119, 243901 (2017)

    2017

  36. [43]

    Z. Wang, B. Luk’yanchuk, L. Yue, B. Yan, J. Monks, R. Dhama, O. V . Minin, I. V . Minin, S. Huang, and A. A. Fedyanin, High order fano resonances and giant magnetic fields in dielectric microspheres, Scientific Reports9, 20293 (2019)

    2019

  37. [44]

    The width of a resonant peak may be broadened by adding dis- sipation, but at the expense of the response amplitude

  38. [45]

    C. L. Willey, V . W. Chen, D. Roca, A. Kianfar, M. I. Hussein, and A. T. Juhl, Coiled phononic crystal with periodic rotational locking: subwavelength Bragg band gaps, Physical Review Ap- plied18, 014035 (2022)

    2022

  39. [46]

    Future work may follow the same methodology for air or other fluids

  40. [47]

    W. M. F. Orr, The stability or instability of the steady motions of a perfect liquid and of a viscous liquid. Part II: A viscous liquid, Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy. Section A: Mathemat- ical and Physical Sciences27, 69 (1907)

    1907

  41. [48]

    Sommerfeld, Ein beitrag zur hydrodynamischen erklärung der turbulenten flüssigkeitsbewegungen, inProceedings of the F ourth International Congress of Mathematicians, V ol

    A. Sommerfeld, Ein beitrag zur hydrodynamischen erklärung der turbulenten flüssigkeitsbewegungen, inProceedings of the F ourth International Congress of Mathematicians, V ol. III (Teubner, Leipzig, 1909) pp. 116–124, presented at the Inter- national Congress of Mathematicians,...

    1909

  42. [49]

    Danabasoglu, S

    G. Danabasoglu, S. Biringen, and C. L. Streett, Spatial simula- tion of instability control by periodic suction blowing, Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics3, 2138 (1991)

    1991

  43. [50]

    Saiki, S

    E. Saiki, S. Biringen, G. Danabasoglu, and C. Streett, Spatial simulation of secondary instability in plane channel flow: com- parison of K-and H-type disturbances, Journal of Fluid Me- chanics253, 485 (1993)

    1993

  44. [51]

    Kucala and S

    A. Kucala and S. Biringen, Spatial simulation of channel flow instability and control, Journal of Fluid Mechanics738, 105 (2014)

    2014

  45. [52]

    M. J. Lighthill, On displacement thickness, Journal of Fluid Mechanics4, 383 (1958)

    1958

  46. [53]

    N. L. Sankar, J. B. Malone, and Y . Tassa, An implicit con- servative algorithm for steady and unsteady three-dimensional transonic potential flows, inAIAA Paper 81-1016, June 1981 (1981)

    1981

  47. [54]

    M. V . Morkovin, On roughness-induced transition: facts, views, and speculations, inInstability and Transition: Materials of the workshop held May 15-June 9, 1989 in Hampton, Virgina V ol- ume 1(Springer, 1990) pp. 281–295

    1989

  48. [55]

    Sal-Anglada, D

    G. Sal-Anglada, D. Yago, J. Cante, J. Oliver, and D. Roca, Op- timal design of multiresonant layered acoustic metamaterials (mlam) via a homogenization approach, Engineering Structures 293, 116555 (2023)

    2023

  49. [56]

    D. Yago, G. Sal-Anglada, D. Roca, J. Cante, and J. Oliver, Machine learning in solid mechanics: Application to acoustic metamaterial design, International Journal for Numerical Meth- ods in Engineering125, e7476 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Kasagi, Y

    N. Kasagi, Y . Hasegawa, K. Fukagata, and K. Iwamoto, Con- trol of turbulent transport: Less friction and more heat transfer, Journal of Heat Transfer134, 031009 (2012)

    2012

  51. [59]

    Kianfar and P

    A. Kianfar and P. L. Johnson, Moment of momentum integral analysis of turbulent boundary layers with pressure gradient, Journal of Fluid Mechanics1002, A29 (2025)

    2025

  52. [60]

    Fukagata, K

    K. Fukagata, K. Iwamoto, and N. Kasagi, Contribution of reynolds stress distribution to the skin friction in wall-bounded flows, Physics of Fluids14, L73 (2002)

    2002

  53. [61]

    G. Ma, M. Xiao, and C. T. Chan, Topological phases in acous- tic and mechanical systems, Nature Reviews Physics1, 281 (2019)

    2019

  54. [62]

    Y . Chen, R. Fleury, P. Seppecher, G. Hu, and M. Wegener, Non- local metamaterials and metasurfaces, Nature Reviews Physics 7, 299 (2025)

    2025

  55. [63]

    M. D. Fronk, L. Fang, P. Packo, and M. J. Leamy, Elastic wave propagation in weakly nonlinear media and metamaterials: a re- view of recent developments, Nonlinear Dynamics111, 10709 (2023)

    2023

  56. [64]

    Avallone, F

    F. Avallone, F. Bosia, Y . Chen, G. Colombo, R. Craster, J. M. De Ponti, N. Fabbiane, M. R. Haberman, M. I. Hus- sein, W. Hwang, U. Iemma, A. Juhl, M. Kadic, M. Kotsonis, V . Laude, O. Marquet, F. Mery, T. Michelis, M. Nouh, D. Ragni, M. Touboul, M. Wegener, and A. O. Krushyns...

    2025 arXiv

  57. [65]

    M. I. Hussein, G. M. Hulbert, and R. A. Scott, Dispersive elas- todynamics of 1D banded materials and structures: analysis, Journal of Sound and Vibration289, 779 (2006)

    2006

  58. [66]

    N. M. Newmark, A method of computation for structural dy- namics, Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division85, 67 (1959). 18

    1959

  59. [67]

    Farhat and M

    C. Farhat and M. Lesoinne, Two effcient staggered algorithms for the serial and parallel solution of three-dimensional nonlin- ear transient aeroelastic problems, Computer Methods in Ap- plied Mechanics and Engineering182, 499 (2000)

    2000

  60. [68]

    Prandtl, Bemerkungen über die entstehung der turbu- lenz, ZAMM-Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechan- ics/Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik1, 431 (1921)

    L. Prandtl, Bemerkungen über die entstehung der turbu- lenz, ZAMM-Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechan- ics/Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik1, 431 (1921)

    1921

  61. [69]

    Cossu and L

    C. Cossu and L. Brandt, On Tollmien—Schlichting-like waves in streaky boundary layers, European Journal of Mechanics B/Fluids23, 815 (2004)

    2004

  62. [70]

    Bannier, E

    A. Bannier, E. Garnier, and P. Sagaut, Riblet flow model based on an extended fik identity, Flow, Turbulence And Combustion 95, 351 (2015)

    2015

  63. [71]

    S. B. Pope and S. B. Pope,Turbulent Flows(Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2000)

    2000

  64. [72]

    G. B. Schubauer and H. K. Skramstad, Laminar boundary-layer oscillations and stability of laminar flow, Journal of the Aero- nautical Sciences14, 69 (1947)

    1947

  65. [73]

    L. M. Mack, Boundary-layer linear stability theory, inAGARD Special Course on Stability and Transition of Laminar Flow, AGARD Report, V ol. 709 (1984)

    1984

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.