pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20658 · v1 · pith:NX64PK77new · submitted 2026-05-20 · 🧮 math.GR · math.CO

Generalized quaternion NCI-groups, NNN-groups and NNND-groups

Jun-Feng Yang , jia-Li Du , Yan-Quan Feng , Young Soo Kwon This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 02:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.GR math.CO
keywords generalized quaternion groupNCI-groupNNN-groupNNND-groupnormal Cayley graphCayley digraphgroup automorphism
0
0 comments X

The pith

The generalized quaternion group Q_{4n} is an NCI-group for every n at least 2, never an NNN-group, and an NNND-group precisely when n is even and at least 6.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper completes the NCI classification for generalized quaternion groups by proving that Q_{4n} has every normal Cayley graph as a CI-graph. It further shows that no such group admits a normal Cayley graph whose automorphism group contains a non-normal regular copy of the group, while certain even orders allow this for digraphs. A reader would care because these results fix exactly how much extra symmetry normal Cayley objects on Q_{4n} can have, finishing a case left open after the corresponding digraph classification. The proofs use the known NDCI behavior of these groups together with their standard automorphism and subgroup structure.

Core claim

We solve the question and prove that Q_{4n} is an NCI-group for every n≥2. Q_{4n} is not an NNN-group for every n≥2, and is an NNND-group if and only if n≥6 and n is even.

What carries the argument

The NCI, NNN and NNND properties of normal Cayley graphs and digraphs on the generalized quaternion group Q_{4n}, determined by whether isomorphisms of such objects come from group automorphisms and whether their full automorphism groups contain extra non-normal regular copies of Q_{4n}.

If this is right

  • Every pair of isomorphic normal Cayley graphs on Q_{4n} must have connection sets that differ by a group automorphism.
  • No normal Cayley graph on Q_{4n} has an automorphism group that properly contains a non-normal regular copy of Q_{4n}.
  • For even n at least 6, there exist normal Cayley digraphs on Q_{4n} whose automorphism groups do contain such extra regular copies.
  • The NCI property holds uniformly across all orders 4n with n≥2, independent of parity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These uniform NCI and NNN results may simplify isomorphism testing algorithms specifically for Cayley graphs generated from quaternion groups.
  • The sharp even-order threshold for the NNND property invites checking whether similar thresholds appear for other families of 2-groups.
  • Knowing the exact cases where extra regular subgroups appear could guide constructions of graphs with controlled symmetry in related algebraic settings.

Load-bearing premise

The arguments rest on the already-known NDCI classification for these groups together with basic facts about their automorphism groups and normal subgroups.

What would settle it

Finding one normal Cayley graph on some Q_{4n} (for example n=4) that is isomorphic to a second normal Cayley graph but whose connection sets are not related by any automorphism of Q_{4n}, or exhibiting an NNN graph on any Q_{4n}.

read the original abstract

A Cayley (di)graph $\Cay(G,S)$ of a finite group $G$ is called CI if, for every Cayley (di)graph $\Cay(G,T)$ of $G$, $\Cay(G,S)\cong \Cay(G,T)$ implies that $S^{\sigma}=T$ for some $\sigma\in \Aut(G)$. The group $G$ is called an NDCI-group (resp. NCI-group) if every normal Cayley digraph (resp. graph) of $G$ is CI. It was shown that the generalized quaternion group $\Q_{4n}$ of order $4n$ ($n\geq 2$) is an NDCI-group if and only if either $n=2$ or $n$ is odd, but its NCI-group classification has been left as an open question. In this paper, we solve the question and prove that $\Q_{4n}$ is an NCI-group for every $n\geq 2$. A normal Cayley (di)graph of a group $G$ is called NNN if its automorphism group contains a non-normal regular subgroup isomorphic to $G$, and $G$ is called an NNND-group (resp. NNN-group) if it admits an NNN Cayley digraph (resp. graph). In this paper, we show that $\Q_{4n}$ is not an NNN-group for every $n\geq 2$, and is an NNND-group if and only if $n\geq 6$ and $n$ is even.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript resolves an open question by proving that every generalized quaternion group Q_{4n} (n≥2) is an NCI-group. It further establishes that Q_{4n} is never an NNN-group and is an NNND-group precisely when n≥6 is even. The arguments rely on the known NDCI classification (Q_{4n} is NDCI iff n=2 or n odd), the standard structure Aut(Q_{4n}) ≅ Z_{2n} ⋊ Z_2, and the lattice of normal subgroups.

Significance. If correct, the results complete the NCI classification for this family and supply new information on the existence of non-normal regular subgroups inside Aut of normal Cayley graphs/digraphs. The work is grounded in standard facts about quaternion groups and supplies explicit conditions that are in principle falsifiable by direct computation for small n.

major comments (1)
  1. [Proof of Theorem 3.1 (or equivalent NCI theorem for even n)] The separation between the NCI and NDCI cases for even n is load-bearing for the main NCI claim. The manuscript treats normal Cayley graphs directly via the action on the connection set rather than reducing to the digraph result; an explicit statement of why the NDCI obstruction does not carry over to the undirected case (e.g., via a concrete proposition or lemma) would strengthen the argument.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction / §2] The definitions of NNN and NNND are introduced after the NCI material; a brief forward reference or consolidated preliminary section would improve readability.
  2. [Proof of the NNND classification] For the NNND claim, the boundary cases n=4 (even but <6) and n=5 (odd) should be accompanied by explicit verification that no NNN digraph exists, even if the general argument covers them.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and the recommendation of minor revision. The single major comment concerns the clarity of the distinction between the NCI and NDCI cases for even n. We address this below and will incorporate the suggested clarification.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Proof of Theorem 3.1 (or equivalent NCI theorem for even n)] The separation between the NCI and NDCI cases for even n is load-bearing for the main NCI claim. The manuscript treats normal Cayley graphs directly via the action on the connection set rather than reducing to the digraph result; an explicit statement of why the NDCI obstruction does not carry over to the undirected case (e.g., via a concrete proposition or lemma) would strengthen the argument.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit statement would improve the exposition. In the revised manuscript we will insert a brief remark (or short lemma) immediately before the proof of the even-n NCI result. The remark will note that the NDCI obstruction for even n relies on the existence of automorphisms that preserve a directed connection set S but fail to preserve its inverse closure; when S is required to be inverse-closed (as it must be for an undirected Cayley graph), these automorphisms are excluded from consideration, so the obstruction does not arise. This distinction is already implicit in our direct analysis of the action on the inverse-closed set, but we will state it explicitly as suggested. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper's central results on NCI, NNN, and NNND properties for Q_{4n} are established through direct examination of Aut(Q_{4n}) ≅ (Z_{2n} ⋊ Z_2) and the lattice of normal subgroups (cyclic of index 2 and unique cyclic of index 4), applying these to the action on connection sets for normal Cayley graphs and digraphs. The cited prior NDCI classification (for n=2 or odd n) serves as background context separating cases but is not invoked as a load-bearing reduction or self-definition for the new NCI/NNN/NNND claims; the derivations remain independent and rely on standard group-theoretic facts without fitted inputs, ansatzes smuggled via citation, or renaming of known results. No step equates a derived quantity to its input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard axioms of finite group theory and the automorphism group structure of generalized quaternion groups, plus one cited prior classification result. No free parameters or new invented entities appear in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard axioms and basic facts of finite group theory, including the structure of Aut(Q_{4n}) and normal subgroups of Q_{4n}.
    Invoked for all definitions of Cayley graphs, automorphisms, normality, and the prior NDCI result.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5827 in / 1256 out tokens · 48264 ms · 2026-05-21T02:50:01.772095+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    ´Ad´ am, Research Problem 2-10, J

    A. ´Ad´ am, Research Problem 2-10, J. Combin. Theory 2(3) (1967) 393,https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0021-9800(67)80037-1

    work page 1967

  2. [2]

    Alspach, I

    B. Alspach, I. D. Parsons, Isomorphism of circulant graphs and digraphs, Discrete Math. 25(2) (1979) 97-108, https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-365X(79)90011-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0012-365x(79)90011-6 1979

  3. [3]

    Alspach, L

    B. Alspach, L. Nowitz, Elementary proofs thatZ 2 p andZ 3 p are CI-groups, European J. Combin. 20(7) (1999) 607-617,https://doi.org/10.1006/eujc.1999.0309

    work page doi:10.1006/eujc.1999.0309 1999

  4. [4]

    Babai, Isomorphism problem for a class of point-symmetric structures, Acta Math

    L. Babai, Isomorphism problem for a class of point-symmetric structures, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hung. 29 (1977) 329-336,https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01895854

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01895854 1977

  5. [5]

    Bamberg, M

    J. Bamberg, M. Giudici, Point regular groups of automorphisms of generalised quadrangles, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 118 (2011) 1114-1128,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcta.2010.11.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcta.2010.11.004 2011

  6. [6]

    Bosma, J

    W. Bosma, J. Cannon, C. Playoust, The MAGMA algebra system I: The user language, J. Symbolic Comput. 24 (1997) 235-265.https://doi.org/10.1006/jsco.1996.0125

    work page doi:10.1006/jsco.1996.0125 1997

  7. [7]

    Conder, C.H

    M. Conder, C.H. Li, On isomorphisms of finite Cayley graphs, European J. Combin. 19 (1998) 911-919,https: //doi.org/10.1006/eujc.1998.0243

    work page doi:10.1006/eujc.1998.0243 1998

  8. [8]

    Dobson, Isomorphism problem for Cayley graphs ofZ 3 p, Discrete Math

    E. Dobson, Isomorphism problem for Cayley graphs ofZ 3 p, Discrete Math. 147(1-3) (1995) 87-94,https: //doi.org/10.1016/0012-365X(95)00099-I

    work page doi:10.1016/0012-365x(95)00099-i 1995

  9. [9]

    Dobson, A

    E. Dobson, A. Malniˇ c, D. Maruˇ siˇ c, Symmetry in graphs. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022,https://doi.org/10. 1017/9781108553995

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Dobson, J

    E. Dobson, J. Morris, P. Spiga, Further restrictions on the structure of finite DCI-groups: an addendum, J. Algebraic Combin. 42 (2015) 959-969,https://doi.org/10.1007/s10801-015-0612-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10801-015-0612-3 2015

  11. [11]

    D. ´Z. Djokovi´ c, Isomorphism problem for a special class of graphs, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hung. 21 (1970) 267-270,https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01894773

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01894773 1970

  12. [12]

    Elspas, J

    B. Elspas, J. Turner, Graphs with circulant adjacency matrices, J. Combin. Theory 9 (1970) 297-307,https: //doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9800(70)80068-0. 17

    work page doi:10.1016/s0021-9800(70)80068-0 1970

  13. [13]

    Y.-Q. Feng, I. Kov´ acs, Elementary abelian groups of rank 5 are DCI-groups, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 157 (2018) 162-204,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcta.2018.02.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcta.2018.02.003 2018

  14. [14]

    Giudici, M

    M. Giudici, M. R. Smith, A note on quotients of strongly regular graphs, Ars Math. Contemp. 3 (2010) 147-150, https://doi.org/10.26493/1855-3974.148.354

    work page doi:10.26493/1855-3974.148.354 2010

  15. [15]

    https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv

    M. Giudici, L. Morgan, Y. Xu, The NNN-property of cyclic groups, 2019,https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 1908.08838

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Godsil, On Cayley graph isomorphisms, Ars Combin

    C.D. Godsil, On Cayley graph isomorphisms, Ars Combin. 15 (1983) 231-246

    work page 1983

  17. [17]

    Hirasaka, M

    M. Hirasaka, M. Muzychuk, An elementary abelian group of rank 4 is a CI-group, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 94(2) (2001) 339-362,https://doi.org/10.1006/jcta.2000.3140

    work page doi:10.1006/jcta.2000.3140 2001

  18. [18]

    Huppert, Endliche Gruppen I, Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften Band 134, Springer- Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1967,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-64981-3

    B. Huppert, Endliche Gruppen I, Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften Band 134, Springer- Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1967,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-64981-3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-64981-3 1967

  19. [19]

    Kov´ acs, G

    I. Kov´ acs, G. Ryabov, The groupC 4 p×Cq is a DCI-group, Discrete Math. 345 (2022) 112705,https://doi. org/10.1016/j.disc.2021.112705

    work page doi:10.1016/j.disc.2021.112705 2022

  20. [20]

    Kov´ acs, G

    I. Kov´ acs, G. Ryabov, CI-property for decomposable Schur rings over an abelian group, Algebra Colloq. 26(1) (2019) 147-160,https://doi.org/10.1142/S1005386719000142

    work page doi:10.1142/s1005386719000142 2019

  21. [21]

    Li, On isomorphisms of finite Cayley graphs–a survey, Discrete Math

    C.H. Li, On isomorphisms of finite Cayley graphs–a survey, Discrete Math. 256 (2002) 301-334,https://doi. org/10.1016/S0012-365X(01)00438-1

    work page doi:10.1016/s0012-365x(01)00438-1 2002

  22. [22]

    C.H. Li, Z.P. Lu, P.P. P´ alfy, Further restriction on the structure of finite CI-groups, J. Algebraic Combin. 26 (2007) 161-181,https://doi.org/10.1007/s10801-006-0052-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s10801-006-0052-1 2007

  23. [23]

    Morris, Elementary proof thatZ 4 p is a DCI-group, Discrete Math

    J. Morris, Elementary proof thatZ 4 p is a DCI-group, Discrete Math. 338 (2015) 1385-1393,https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.disc.2015.02.023

    work page doi:10.1016/j.disc.2015.02.023 2015

  24. [24]

    Muzychuk, ´Ad´ am’s conjecture is true in the square-free case, J

    M. Muzychuk, ´Ad´ am’s conjecture is true in the square-free case, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 72 (1995) 118-134, https://doi.org/10.1016/0097-3165(95)90031-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0097-3165(95)90031-4 1995

  25. [25]

    Muzychuk, An elementary abelian group of large rank is not a CI-group, Discrete Math

    M. Muzychuk, An elementary abelian group of large rank is not a CI-group, Discrete Math. 264 (2003) 167-185, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-365X(02)00558-7

    work page doi:10.1016/s0012-365x(02)00558-7 2003

  26. [26]

    Muzychuk, On ´Ad´ am’s conjecture for circulant graphs, Discrete Math

    M. Muzychuk, On ´Ad´ am’s conjecture for circulant graphs, Discrete Math. 176 (1997) 285-298,https://doi. org/10.1016/S0012-365X(96)00251-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0012-365x(96)00251-8 1997

  27. [27]

    Somlai, M

    G. Somlai, M. Muzychuk, The Cayley isomorphism property forZ 3 p×Zq, Algebr. Combin. 4(2) (2021) 289-299, https://doi.org/10.5802/alco.154

    work page doi:10.5802/alco.154 2021

  28. [28]

    L. A. Nowitz, A non-Cayley-invariant Cayley graph of the elementary abelian group of order 64, Discrete Math. 110(1-3) (1992) 223-228,https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-365X(92)90711-N

    work page doi:10.1016/0012-365x(92)90711-n 1992

  29. [29]

    P´ alfy, Isomorphism problem for relational structures with a cyclic automorphism, European J

    P.P. P´ alfy, Isomorphism problem for relational structures with a cyclic automorphism, European J. Combin. 8 (1987) 35-43,https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6698(87)80018-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s0195-6698(87)80018-5 1987

  30. [30]

    Rotman, An Introduction to the Theory of Groups, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995,https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-1-4612-8686-8

    J.J. Rotman, An Introduction to the Theory of Groups, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995,https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-1-4612-8686-8

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-8686-8 1995

  31. [31]

    G. F. Royle, A normal non-Cayley-invariant graph for the elementary abelian group of order 64, J. Aust. Math. Soc. 85 (2008) 347-351,https://doi.org/10.1017/S1446788708000931

    work page doi:10.1017/s1446788708000931 2008

  32. [32]

    Ryabov, On CI-property of normal Cayley digraphs over abelian groups, J

    G. Ryabov, On CI-property of normal Cayley digraphs over abelian groups, J. Algebra Appl. 2750070, 2027, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219498827500708

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219498827500708 2027

  33. [33]

    Somlai, Elementary abelianp-groups of rank 2p+ 3 are not CI-groups, J

    G. Somlai, Elementary abelianp-groups of rank 2p+ 3 are not CI-groups, J. Algebraic Combin. 34(3) (2011) 323-335,https://doi.org/10.1007/s10801-011-0273-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s10801-011-0273-9 2011

  34. [34]

    Spiga, Elementary abelianp-groups of rank greater than or equal to 4p−2 are not CI-groups, J

    P. Spiga, Elementary abelianp-groups of rank greater than or equal to 4p−2 are not CI-groups, J. Algebraic Combin. 26 (2007) 343-355,https://doi.org/10.1007/s10801-007-0059-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s10801-007-0059-2 2007

  35. [35]

    Spiga, CI-property of elementary abelian 3-groups, Discrete Math

    P. Spiga, CI-property of elementary abelian 3-groups, Discrete Math. 309 (2009) 3393-3398,https://doi. org/10.1016/j.disc.2008.08.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.disc.2008.08.002 2009

  36. [36]

    Turner, Point-symmetric graphs with a prime number of points, J

    J. Turner, Point-symmetric graphs with a prime number of points, J. Combin. Theory 3 (1967) 136-145, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9800(67)80003-6

    work page doi:10.1016/s0021-9800(67)80003-6 1967

  37. [37]

    Xie, Y.-Q

    J.-H. Xie, Y.-Q. Feng, G. Ryabov, Y.-L. Liu, Normal Cayley digraphs of cyclic groups with CI-property, Comm. Algebra 50 (2022) 2911-2920,https://doi.org/10.1080/00927872.2021.2022156

    work page doi:10.1080/00927872.2021.2022156 2022

  38. [38]

    Xie, Y.-Q

    J.-H. Xie, Y.-Q. Feng, Y. S. Kwon, Normal Cayley digraphs of generalised quaternion groups with CI-property, Appl. Math. Comput. 422 (2022) 126966,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2022.126966

    work page doi:10.1016/j.amc.2022.126966 2022

  39. [39]

    Xie, Y.-Q

    J.-H. Xie, Y.-Q. Feng, J.-X. Zhou, Normal Cayley digraphs of dihedral groups with the CI-property, Ars Math. Contemp. 23 (2023) #P4.08,https://doi.org/10.26493/1855-3974.2688.2de

    work page doi:10.26493/1855-3974.2688.2de 2023

  40. [40]

    Xu, Normal and non-normal Cayley graphs for symmetric groups, Discrete Math

    Y. Xu, Normal and non-normal Cayley graphs for symmetric groups, Discrete Math. 345 (2022) 112834, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2022.112834. 18

    work page doi:10.1016/j.disc.2022.112834 2022

  41. [41]

    Xu, On constructing normal and non-normal Cayley graphs, Discrete Math

    Y. Xu, On constructing normal and non-normal Cayley graphs, Discrete Math. 340 (2017) 2972-2977,https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2017.07.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.disc.2017.07.018 2017

  42. [42]

    Xu, Normal and non-normal Cayley graphs

    Y. Xu, Normal and non-normal Cayley graphs. PhD thesis, The University of Western Australia, 2018

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Xu, Automorphism groups and isomorphisms of Cayley digraphs, Discrete Math

    M.Y. Xu, Automorphism groups and isomorphisms of Cayley digraphs, Discrete Math. 182 (1998) 309-319, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-365X(97)00152-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s0012-365x(97)00152-0 1998

  44. [44]

    Yang, Y.-Q

    J.-F. Yang, Y.-Q. Feng, F.-G. Yin, J.-X. Zhou, Cyclic and dihedral NNN-groups and NNND-groups, J. Group Theory, published online, 2026,https://doi.org/10.1515/jgth-2025-0132. School of mathematics and statistics, Beijing Key Laboratory of Biological Big Data and Topological Statistics, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, 100044, P.R. China Email address...

    work page doi:10.1515/jgth-2025-0132 2026