Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 3 minor 60 references

Free boundary space-like graphs with prescribed mean curvature

T0 review · 1 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read On a bounded convex domain with zero capillary boundary condition, the prescribed Lorentzian mean curvature problem has a unique $W^{2,2}$ weak solution that is uniformly space-like and is exactly the unique maximizer of the associated…

desk verdict A genuinely new capillary/free-boundary result for the Born-Infeld operator, with a real but fixable gap in the advertised data-only space-like bound. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.00887 v1 pith:NXB7ANIW submitted 2026-08-01 math.AP

Lorenzo Maniscalco This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35J9353C5035J6635B4549Q0553A1078A25
keywords prescribedLorentzianmeancurvatureBorn–Infeldcapillaryboundaryconditionfreespace-likegraphslightsegmentsW^{22}regularityapriorigradientestimates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes the first existence and regularity result for the prescribed Lorentzian mean curvature equation with a free boundary (homogeneous capillary) condition. On any bounded convex domain $\Omega$, a bounded zero-mean datum $\rho$ admits a unique, up to additive constants, weak solution $u\in W^{2,2}(\Omega)\cap C(\Omega)$, and the gradient satisfies $|Du|\le 1-\theta$ for some $\theta\in(0,1)$ depending only on the data. The same function is the unique maximizer of the Lorentzian area-plus-charge functional over 1-Lipschitz zero-mean functions, so the variational solution and the PDE solution coincide. The key step is showing that maximizers cannot contain interior light segments—segments where $|Du|=1$—and that a free-boundary monotonicity formula then upgrades this to uniform space-likeness. If correct, this supplies the capillary, or free-boundary, counterpart to the known Dirichlet theory, with direct relevance to Born–Infeld electrostatics and space-like capillary hypersurfaces in Minkowski spacetime.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the tilt function $w_u=(1-|Du|^2)^{-1/2}$, which measures the hyperbolic cosine of the angle between the graph's normal and the vertical direction and blows up as the graph approaches light-like behavior, and its reciprocal $v=w^{-1}=\sqrt{1-|Du|^2}$, the Lorentzian volume density. Three mechanisms carry the argument. First, the no-light-segment comparison: if a maximizer had an interior segment with $u(y)-u(x)=|y-x|$, comparison with the constant-mean-curvature cones of formula (2.7) produces a contradiction, so bounded forcing and bounded capillary data cannot generate light segments by themselves. Second, the free-boundary monotonicity formula of Lemma 3.3, an improvement of the earlier Dirichlet-side formula, asserts that for free-boundary solutions on convex $C^2$ domains, $C\exp(4(\Lambda^2R^2+1))v(o)^\alpha \ge R^{-m}\int_{E_R}v^{\alpha+1}\,dx + R^{2-m}\int_{E_R}|D^2u|^2\,dx$ with $\alpha<1/m$; this holds even when the Lorentzian balls touch the boundary. Third, a Bernstein-type boundary gradient estimate (Theorem 3.4) for smooth strictly convex domains with zero capillary datum gives uniform space-likeness of the approximating classical solutions, which are then produced by a fixed-point argument using boundary regularity theory.

What would settle it

Compute the fixed-point solutions $u_\varepsilon$ of Section 4.1 for a smooth strictly convex domain and a smooth zero-mean $\rho$ with $\|\rho\|_{L^\infty}\le\Lambda$; they solve $H_{u_\varepsilon}=\varepsilon u_\varepsilon-\rho$ with $Du_\varepsilon\cdot n=0$. If $\sup_\Omega |Du_\varepsilon|$ tends to 1 as $\varepsilon\to0$ for some such $\rho$, then the uniform bound of Theorem 3.4 fails and the conclusion $|Du|\le1-\theta$ of Theorem 1.1 is false. A direct refutation of the no-light-segment claim would be a bounded zero-mean $\rho$ on a convex $\Omega$ whose unique maximizer of $I_{\rho,0}$ has a light segment in the interior of $\Omega$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 1.1: let $\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^m$ be a bounded convex domain, let $\rho$ be a bounded zero-mean function, and set the capillary boundary datum $\psi=0$. Then the free-boundary prescribed mean curvature problem, formally $-\operatorname{div}(Du/\sqrt{1-|Du|^2})=\rho$ in $\Omega$ with $Du\cdot n/\sqrt{1-|Du|^2}=0$ on $\partial\Omega$, has a weak solution $u\in W^{2,2}(\Omega)\cap C(\Omega)$; the solution is unique up to additive constants, and there is $\theta\in(0,1)$ depending only on $m$, $\Omega$, and $\|\rho\|_{L^\infty}$ such that $|Du|\le 1-\theta$ almost everywhere. The proof identifies $u$ as the unique maximizer of the functional $I_{\rho,0}(v)=\int_\Omega(\sqrt{1-|Dv|^2}+\rho v)$ among 1-Lipschitz zero-mean functions, and then shows this maximizer is regular. The decisive steps are a no-light-segment theorem, valid for arbitrary bounded capillary data, and a monotonicity formula that controls the average of the Lorentzian volume density and of the second derivatives by the value of the density at any point; together they rule out light-like behavior and yield uniform space-likeness.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that on smooth strictly convex domains with zero contact-angle boundary condition, every classical solution with prescribed bounded mean curvature is uniformly space-like with a bound controlled by the data; the paper proves this only for the zero capillary datum, and for nonzero capillary data the boundary step of the estimate is stated to break down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every bounded zero-mean $\rho$ on a bounded convex domain, the homogeneous capillary Born–Infeld problem has a zero-mean weak solution with finite tilt, so the free-boundary electrostatic potential exists, is unique, and never reaches the light cone.
  • The weak solution is exactly the unique maximizer of the Lorentzian area-plus-charge functional over 1-Lipschitz zero-mean functions, so variational maximizers of this functional are automatically $W^{2,2}$ solutions of the Euler–Lagrange equation.
  • Any capillary maximizer, even with nonzero bounded boundary datum $\psi$, has no interior light segments; the possible failure of existence for general $\psi$ is therefore located entirely in boundary gradient control, not in interior light-like singularities.
  • The quantitative bound $|Du|\le 1-\theta$ with $\theta$ depending only on $m$, $\Omega$, and $\|\rho\|_{L^\infty}$ is part of the theorem, so the space-likeness margin is controlled by the data rather than by the approximating sequence.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the no-light-segment theorem holds for arbitrary bounded capillary data, the missing ingredient for a full existence theorem with nonzero $\psi$ appears to be only a Bernstein-type boundary gradient estimate of the kind proved for $\psi=0$; a suitable such estimate would likely carry the same exhaustion-and-compactness route through unchanged.
  • The free-boundary monotonicity formula probably implies a rigidity statement beyond maximizers: any strictly space-like free-boundary solution on a convex domain with bounded mean curvature that is light-like at one point must be light-like everywhere, so combining Lemma 3.3 with a no-light-segment result could characterize uniform space-likeness for a wider class of solutions.
  • In Born–Infeld electrostatics, the homogeneous capillary condition is the natural zero-contact-angle or boundary-tangential-field condition; extending the theorem to measure-valued charges would give a variational construction of the potential for point or sheet charges inside a convex cavity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the prescribed Lorentzian mean curvature (Born-Infeld) equation with a homogeneous capillary boundary condition on a bounded convex domain. The main theorem asserts existence of a unique zero-mean weak solution in W^{2,2}(Ω)∩C(Ω), together with a uniform space-likeness bound |Du|≤1-θ with θ depending only on the data. The proof proceeds in three parts: first, a variational analysis of the associated concave functional, including a no-light-segment theorem for the maximizer for arbitrary bounded capillary data; second, a free-boundary version of the Bartnik-Simon monotonicity formula and a Bernstein-type gradient estimate for classical solutions on strictly convex domains; third, an approximation argument by mollified data and smooth convex domains to obtain the weak solution to the original problem. The paper also includes a detailed appendix with the linear oblique-derivative theory used in the existence argument.

Significance. If the result holds, it is a meaningful advance: it appears to be the first existence and W^{2,2} regularity result for a non-Dirichlet boundary value problem for the prescribed Lorentzian mean curvature operator, and it establishes uniform space-likeness from data alone. The no-light-segment theorem for arbitrary bounded capillary data is a useful standalone contribution, and the free-boundary monotonicity formula is a genuine extension of the Bartnik-Simon machinery. The proofs are detailed, the external anchors (Bartnik-Simon, Lieberman) are appropriate, and the paper is transparent about the cases it cannot handle (general ψ, non-convex or merely Lipschitz domains). These strengths make the central claim credible and worth publishing after revision.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4.2, Step 4 (proof of Theorem 1.1, after Eq. (4.11))] The theorem statement and abstract assert a constant C=C(m,Ω,Λ) for the tilt bound w_u≤C, i.e. a uniform space-likeness estimate depending only on the prescribed data. The proof, however, obtains θ=(δ/C)^{1/α}, where 2δ=∫_Ω v^{α+1}dx is the L^{α+1} mass of the tilt function v of the specific limit maximizer u. No lower bound for δ in terms of m, Ω, and Λ is supplied, and δ could a priori tend to 0 along a sequence of admissible data ρ with |ρ|≤Λ. Thus the data-only uniformity asserted in Theorem 1.1 is not established by the written argument. This does not affect the existence, uniqueness, or W^{2,2} regularity parts of the theorem, and the gap is repairable by a standard compactness argument: a sequence of maximizers with essinf v_n→0 would, after weak-* extraction, converge to a maximizer for a weak-* limit datum, and the monotonicity inequality would force that limit to satisfy v=0 a.e. and hence to contain interior light segments, contradicting Theorem 1.3. The authors should add this argument and state the resulting uniform bound explicitly.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, Step 0] The displayed condition {x∈Ω: dist(x,∂Ω)>1/j}⊆Ω_j⋐Ω does not by itself imply Ω_j↗Ω; the authors should either state that the strictly convex smooth Ω_j can be chosen increasing, or adjust the wording to avoid claiming monotonicity that is not guaranteed by the given construction.
  2. [Lemma 3.3, statement] The phrase 'Let Ω⊆R^m be a C^2, convex domain' contains a stray comma; it should read 'a C^2 convex domain'. More substantively, the proof assumes u∈C^3 and says the general case follows by approximation, but the approximation step is only sketched; a brief justification that the boundary condition and convexity are preserved under the approximation would be helpful.
  3. [Theorem 2.11, Step 2] The notation N′ is used for ∂Ω∩B_r(x) and also as the capillary part of ∂Ω′; although the intended meaning is clear from context, a short parenthetical clarification would reduce the risk of confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the main existence and regularity proof rests on independently established monotonicity, gradient, and no-light-segment estimates; the noted uniformity gap in Theorem 1.1 is a correctness issue, not a circular one.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained and non-circular. Theorem 1.1 is obtained by solving smooth approximating problems via the fixed-point argument of Theorem 4.1, whose ingredients are the fully proved Bernstein-type estimate Theorem 3.4 and Lieberman's oblique-derivative theory; by passing to the limit with the monotonicity formula Lemma 3.3, whose proof is included and is an explicit modification of [BS82, Lemma 2.1]; and by using Theorem 1.3, proved independently in Section 2.3 through a comparison argument with CMC barriers and Bartnik–Simon's anti-peeling theorem [BS82, Theorem 3.2], to rule out light segments of the limit maximizer. No parameter is fitted to the target conclusion, and no load-bearing assertion is justified solely by a self-citation. The only caveat we see is a uniformity gap, not circularity: in Step 4 of Section 4.2, the bound theta = (delta/C)^(1/alpha) depends on the particular limit maximizer through delta = (1/2) ∫_Omega v^(alpha+1) dx, while Theorem 1.1 advertises C = C(m, Omega, Lambda); closing this would require a compactness argument. This concerns correctness of the stated data-only uniformity, not circular equivalence of inputs and conclusions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; constants such as θ, C, K are chosen by hand in existence proofs and depend only on the stated data. The paper introduces no new physical or mathematical entities: the CMC comparison functions (2.7) are explicit and classical. The axioms are the standard background results and the stated domain assumptions; the most load-bearing are convexity and the homogeneous capillary condition.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Convexity of the domain Ω is assumed throughout (Theorems 1.1, 1.3, Lemma 3.3, Theorem 3.4).
    Convexity is used in the boundary term of the monotonicity formula (sign of ⟨∇v^α,ν⟩), in the strict convexity argument of the Bernstein estimate, and in the no-light-segment comparison to ensure supporting planes control the distance terms.
  • domain assumption Homogeneous capillary boundary condition ψ=0 for the main theorem; the no-light-segment theorem allows bounded ψ.
    Theorem 3.4 requires ψ=0; the author states that for general bounded ψ the boundary step breaks down.
  • domain assumption Boundedness and zero-mean of ρ (and boundedness of ψ in Theorem 1.3).
    These are the hypotheses of the existence and comparison theorems; the zero-mean condition is necessary by (1.4).
  • standard math Standard elliptic theory: Schauder estimates, maximum principle, Hopf lemma, Lax-Milgram, Lieberman's oblique derivative estimates (Theorems A.2, A.4).
    Used in the fixed-point argument (Lemma 4.4), in linear estimates (Lemma A.2), and in the boundary regularity Theorem A.4.
  • standard math Bartnik-Simon anti-peeling theorem [BS82, Theorem 3.2] (Theorem 2.9).
    Used to force maximal light segments to have endpoints on the boundary; the paper generalizes its statement to mixed boundary data but relies on the original proof.
  • standard math Bartnik-Simon monotonicity formula [BS82, Lemma 2.1] and the subsequent Liouville-type reasoning.
    Lemma 3.3 is a free-boundary refinement; after discarding boundary terms the proof follows [BS82].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Free boundary space-like graphs with prescribed mean curvature." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NXB7ANIW

@misc{pith2026260800887,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Free boundary space-like graphs with prescribed mean curvature},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NXB7ANIW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.00887}
}
abstract

We address the prescribed Lorentzian mean curvature problem over a convex bounded domain $\Omega$ of $\mathbb R^m$ with bounded right-hand side and homogeneous capillary boundary condition. We prove that the problem has a unique $W^{2,2}$-regular weak solution $u$ with zero mean and that $|Du| \leq 1 - \theta$ for some $\theta\in(0,1)$ only depending on the data. Such $u$ is also the unique maximizer of an associated functional. A key step in proving that the maximizer is a weak solution consists in showing that it has no light segments, i.e. segments along which $|Du| = 1$. This holds for arbitrary bounded capillary boundary data and can thus be an interesting result on its own.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bartnik, Robert and Simon, Leon , title =. Comm. Math. Phys. , volume =. 1982 , doi =

    work page 1982

  2. [2]

    Simon, Leon and Spruck, Joel , title =. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , volume =. 1976 , doi =

    work page 1976

  3. [3]

    , title =

    Gilbarg, David and Trudinger, Neil S. , title =. 2001 , address =

    work page 2001

  4. [4]

    O'Neill, Barrett , TITLE =

    work page

  5. [5]

    Hawking, S. W. and Ellis, G. F. R. , title =

    work page

  6. [6]

    Bernal; Miguel Sánchez , journal =

    Antonio N. Bernal; Miguel Sánchez , journal =. 2003 , month =. doi:10.1007/s00220-003-0982-6 , title =

    doi:10.1007/s00220-003-0982-6 2003

  7. [7]

    Recent developments in pseudo-Riemannian geometry , editor =

    Minguzzi, Ettore and S\'anchez, Miguel , title =. Recent developments in pseudo-Riemannian geometry , editor =. 2008 , pages =. gr-qc/0609119 , archivePrefix =

    arXiv 2008

  8. [8]

    and S\'anchez, Miguel , title =

    Bernal, Antonio N. and S\'anchez, Miguel , title =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume =. 2005 , doi =. gr-qc/0401112 , archivePrefix =

    arXiv 2005

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    and S\'anchez, Miguel , title =

    Bernal, Antonio N. and S\'anchez, Miguel , title =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume =. 2007 , doi =. gr-qc/0611138 , archivePrefix =

    2007 arXiv

  2. [10]

    and Wei, S

    Treibergs, Andrejs E. and Wei, S. Walter , TITLE =. J. Differential Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 1983 , NUMBER =

    1983

  3. [11]

    , TITLE =

    Treibergs, Andrejs E. , TITLE =. Invent. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1982 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF01404755 , URL =

    1982 doi

  4. [12]

    Bonsante, Francesco and Seppi, Andrea and Smillie, Peter , TITLE =. Comm. Anal. Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 2023 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4310/cag.2023.v31.n4.a2 , URL =

    2023 doi

  5. [13]

    Choi, Hyeong In and Treibergs, Andrejs , TITLE =. J. Differential Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 1990 , NUMBER =

    1990

  6. [14]

    Cheng, Shiu Yuen and Yau, Shing Tung , TITLE =. Ann. of Math. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 1976 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2307/1970963 , URL =

    1976 doi

  7. [15]

    Bayard, Pierre and Seppi, Andrea , TITLE =. J. Reine Angew. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2025 , PAGES =. doi:10.1515/crelle-2025-0023 , URL =

    2025 doi

  8. [16]

    Acta Math

    Bartnik, Robert , TITLE =. Acta Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1988 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF02392297 , URL =

    1988 doi

  9. [17]

    Kuusi, Tuomo and Mingione, Giuseppe , TITLE =. J. Funct. Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 2012 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2012.02.018 , URL =

    2012 doi

  10. [18]

    Bonheure, Denis and Iacopetti, Alessandro , TITLE =. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 2019 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00205-018-1331-4 , URL =

    2019 doi

  11. [19]

    , TITLE =

    Gilbarg, David and Trudinger, Neil S. , TITLE =. 1977 , PAGES =

    1977

  12. [20]

    and Mastrolia, Paolo and Rigoli, Marco , TITLE =

    Al\'ias, Luis J. and Mastrolia, Paolo and Rigoli, Marco , TITLE =. 2016 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24337-5 , URL =

    2016 doi

  13. [21]

    Bartnik, Robert , TITLE =. Comm. Math. Phys. , FJOURNAL =. 1984 , NUMBER =

    1984

  14. [22]

    Byeon, Jaeyoung and Ikoma, Norihisa and Malchiodi, Andrea and Mari, Luciano , TITLE =. Ann. PDE , FJOURNAL =. 2024 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s40818-023-00167-4 , URL =

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    2025 , eprint =

    Maniscalco, Lorenzo and Mari, Luciano , title =. 2025 , eprint =

    2025

  16. [24]

    2026 , eprint =

    Cora, Gabriele and Iacopetti, Alessandro and Maniscalco, Lorenzo , title =. 2026 , eprint =

    2026

  17. [25]

    2008 , publisher=

    Theory of Sobolev Multipliers: With Applications to Differential and Integral Operators , author=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  18. [26]

    , title =

    Lee, John M. , title =. 2011 , doi =

    2011

  19. [27]

    , title =

    Lloyd, Noel G. , title =

  20. [28]

    , title =

    Lieberman, Gary M. , title =. Nonlinear Anal. , volume =. 1988 , number =

    1988

  21. [29]

    Nardi, Giacomo , title =. Enseign. Math. , volume =. 2014 , number =

    2014

  22. [30]

    1999 , isbn =

    Jackson, John David , title =. 1999 , isbn =

    1999

  23. [31]

    , title =

    Griffiths, David J. , title =. 2017 , isbn =

    2017

  24. [32]

    An Example of a New Type of Cosmological Solutions of

    G. An Example of a New Type of Cosmological Solutions of. Reviews of Modern Physics , volume =. 1949 , doi =

    1949

  25. [33]

    Nonlinear Electrodynamics: Variations on a Theme by

    Bia. Nonlinear Electrodynamics: Variations on a Theme by. Quantum Theory of Particles and Fields , note =. 1983 , pages =

    1983

  26. [34]

    Nature , volume =

    Born, Max , title =. Nature , volume =. 1933 , doi =

    1933

  27. [35]

    Nature , volume =

    Born, Max and Infeld, Leopold , title =. Nature , volume =. 1933 , doi =

    1933

  28. [36]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Born, Max and Infeld, Leopold , title =. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A , volume =. 1934 , doi =

    1934

  29. [37]

    Journal of Mathematical Physics , volume =

    Boillat, Guy , title =. Journal of Mathematical Physics , volume =. 1970 , doi =

    1970

  30. [38]

    Lectures on Non-Linear Electrodynamics , institution =

    Pleba. Lectures on Non-Linear Electrodynamics , institution =. 1970 , type =

    1970

  31. [39]

    Classical Solutions in the Born-Infeld Theory , urldate =

    Yisong Yang , journal =. Classical Solutions in the Born-Infeld Theory , urldate =

  32. [40]

    , biburl =

    Evans, Lawrence C. , biburl =

  33. [41]

    and Gariepy, Ronald F

    Evans, Lawrence C. and Gariepy, Ronald F. , title =. 2015 , pages =

    2015

  34. [42]

    Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung , volume =

    M\"uller, Olaf and S\'anchez, Miguel , title =. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung , volume =. 2014 , doi =

    2014

  35. [43]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume =

    Choquet-Bruhat, Yvonne and Geroch, Robert , title =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume =. 1969 , doi =

    1969

  36. [44]

    Journal of Mathematical Physics , volume =

    Geroch, Robert , title =. Journal of Mathematical Physics , volume =. 1970 , doi =

    1970

  37. [45]

    2009 , doi =

    Ringstr\"om, Hans , title =. 2009 , doi =

    2009

  38. [46]

    , title =

    Wald, Robert M. , title =. 1984 , doi =

    1984

  39. [47]

    and Shapiro, Stuart L

    Baumgarte, Thomas W. and Shapiro, Stuart L. , title =. 2010 , isbn =

    2010

  40. [48]

    2008 , doi =

    Alcubierre, Miguel , title =. 2008 , doi =

    2008

  41. [49]

    2012 , doi =

    Gourgoulhon, \'Eric , title =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  42. [50]

    , title =

    Lieberman, Gary M. , title =. 2013 , pages =

    2013

  43. [51]

    , TITLE =

    Kiessling, Michael K.-H. , TITLE =. J. Statist. Phys. , FJOURNAL =. 2004 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1023/B:JOSS.0000037250.72634.2a , URL =

    2004

  44. [52]

    Bonheure, Denis and d'Avenia, Pietro and Pomponio, Alessio , TITLE =. Comm. Math. Phys. , FJOURNAL =. 2016 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00220-016-2586-y , URL =

    2016 doi

  45. [53]

    , title =

    Klyachin, Aleksei A. , title =. Sb. Math. , volume =. 2003 , pages =

    2003

  46. [54]

    , title =

    Klyachin, Vladimir A. , title =. Izv. Math. , volume =. 2003 , pages =

    2003

  47. [55]

    and Miklyukov, Vladimir M

    Klyachin, Aleksei A. and Miklyukov, Vladimir M. , title =. Russian Acad. Sci. Sb. Math. , volume =. 1993 , pages =

    1993

  48. [56]

    and Miklyukov, Vladimir M

    Klyachin, Aleksei A. and Miklyukov, Vladimir M. , title =. Russian Acad. Sci. Sb. Math. , volume =. 1995 , pages =

    1995

  49. [57]

    2012 , PAGES =

    Maggi, Francesco , TITLE =. 2012 , PAGES =. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139108133 , URL =

    2012 doi

  50. [58]

    Simon, Leon and Spruck, Joel , TITLE =. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 1976 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF00251860 , URL =

    1976 doi

  51. [59]

    , TITLE =

    Korevaar, Nicholas J. , TITLE =. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , FJOURNAL =. 1988 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1080/03605308808820536 , URL =

    1988 doi

  52. [60]

    Gibbons, G. W. Born-Infeld particles and Dirichlet p-branes. Nucl. Phys. B. 1998. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00795-5. arXiv:hep-th/9709027

    1998 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.