pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19456 · v1 · pith:O5HU6SWUnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · 🌊 nlin.CD

Dispersal-induced survival of predators in metacommunities due to transient chaos

Samali Ghosh , Arnob Ray , Everton S. Medeiros , Dibakar Ghosh , Syamal Kumar Dana , Tomasz Kapitaniak , Chittaranjan Hens , Ulrike Feudel This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 02:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌊 nlin.CD
keywords transient chaosasymmetric dispersalmetacommunitiespredator survivaldispersal networkssmall-world networksecological persistencenon-equilibrium dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Asymmetric dispersal in networks sustains predator survival by maintaining transient chaos even in identical environments.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that asymmetric dispersal combined with asynchronous dynamics across patches in a dispersal network prevents predator extinction over broad ranges of dispersal rates. This occurs even in identical environments where synchrony typically leads to collapse. The mechanism relies on non-equilibrium transient chaotic dynamics rather than environmental heterogeneity or equilibrium states. Dispersal coupling perturbs trajectories in patches heading toward extinction and reinforces chaotic motion to sustain oscillations indefinitely. A sympathetic reader would care because minimal connectivity such as small-world networks with a few long-range links can maintain biodiversity in fragmented uniform landscapes.

Core claim

An interplay between asymmetric dispersal and asynchronous dynamics across patches in a dispersal network can prevent predator extinction across broad dispersal ranges, even in identical environments in which synchrony usually drives ecosystems to collapse. This mechanism emerges from non-equilibrium dynamics, specifically from transient chaotic dynamics. Dispersal coupling perturbs local trajectories in patches facing extinction and reinforces chaotic motion, thereby sustaining chaotic oscillations indefinitely. Only minimal connectivity is required as small-world networks with a few long-range links suffice to rescue predator populations.

What carries the argument

transient chaotic dynamics reinforced indefinitely by asymmetric dispersal coupling across network patches

If this is right

  • Predator populations persist across wide dispersal rate ranges in identical environments.
  • Small-world networks with only a few long-range links achieve the rescue effect.
  • The survival mechanism operates through non-equilibrium dynamics and asynchronous patch behavior.
  • Limited well-placed connectivity maintains biodiversity without requiring environmental differences.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Conservation planning in real fragmented habitats could focus on adding a few strategic connections to promote persistence.
  • Similar transient chaos reinforcement might stabilize other ecological systems such as competing species or disease spread.
  • Controlled lab experiments with microbial metacommunities and tunable asymmetric dispersal could directly test indefinite chaos maintenance.

Load-bearing premise

Local patch dynamics must produce transient chaos that leads to extinction when isolated and dispersal coupling must be able to sustain the chaotic regime indefinitely without needing environmental heterogeneity.

What would settle it

An observation or simulation in which asymmetric dispersal in a network of identical patches fails to sustain chaotic oscillations and instead produces global synchronization followed by predator extinction in all patches would disprove the mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19456 by Arnob Ray, Chittaranjan Hens, Dibakar Ghosh, Everton S. Medeiros, Samali Ghosh, Syamal Kumar Dana, Tomasz Kapitaniak, Ulrike Feudel.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Dynamical behavior of the single [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (a)-(c) Three representative network topologies with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Time signals of predator populations in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (a) Mean transient time ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: (a) Basin stability (BS) measurement. We measure BS for the networks [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Variation of the mean transient time for different choices of sets of initial conditions. Plots of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: (a)-(c) Network topology generated using Watts–Strogatz algorithm. We use the network (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Dispersal networks critically shape the fate of ecological communities, yet the mechanisms linking connectivity and persistence remain poorly understood. We show that an interplay between asymmetric dispersal and asynchronous dynamics across patches in a dispersal network can prevent predator extinction across broad dispersal ranges, even in identical environments in which synchrony usually drives ecosystems to collapse. Unlike classical rescue effects based on environmental heterogeneity or equilibrium states, this mechanism emerges from non-equilibrium dynamics, specifically from transient chaotic dynamics. Dispersal coupling perturbs local trajectories in patches facing extinction and reinforce chaotic motion, thereby sustaining chaotic oscillations indefinitely. Strikingly, only minimal connectivity is required: small-world networks with a few long-range links suffice to rescue predator populations. These findings reveal a counterintuitive principle that limited, well-placed connectivity can harness chaos to maintain biodiversity in fragmented landscapes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that asymmetric dispersal in small-world networks can prevent predator extinction in metacommunities by sustaining transient chaotic oscillations indefinitely. Dispersal perturbs local trajectories in patches approaching extinction, reinforcing chaos and asynchronous dynamics even in identical environments where synchrony would otherwise cause collapse. Only minimal long-range connectivity is required, providing a non-equilibrium mechanism distinct from classical rescue effects based on heterogeneity or equilibria.

Significance. If the numerical evidence establishes true permanence rather than extended transients, the work would be significant for nonlinear dynamics and ecology by showing how network topology and chaos can maintain biodiversity in fragmented habitats without environmental variation. The demonstration that small-world structure with few links suffices across dispersal ranges is a strength, as is the emphasis on non-equilibrium dynamics over equilibrium states.

major comments (2)
  1. Results section: The central claim that dispersal 'sustains chaotic oscillations indefinitely' rests on finite-time numerical integrations of the coupled system. No analytical bound on mean extinction time, escape probability from the chaotic attractor, or Lyapunov spectrum of the network is provided to rule out eventual collapse on longer timescales, leaving open the possibility that the reported survival reflects only lengthened transients rather than true permanence. This directly affects the load-bearing assertion in the abstract and main text.
  2. Methods: The local patch model is stated to produce transient chaos leading to extinction in isolation, but the specific parameter values, functional forms, and initial conditions used to generate the reported network trajectories are not cross-referenced to allow independent verification that the isolated case indeed collapses while the coupled case does not within the simulated horizon.
minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: The sentence 'Dispersal coupling perturbs local trajectories in patches facing extinction and reinforce chaotic motion' contains a subject-verb agreement error ('reinforce' should be 'reinforces').
  2. Figure captions: Captions for the network diagrams and time-series plots should explicitly state the rewiring probability, number of patches, and total integration time used to generate the survival curves.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and insightful comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation and reproducibility of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Results section: The central claim that dispersal 'sustains chaotic oscillations indefinitely' rests on finite-time numerical integrations of the coupled system. No analytical bound on mean extinction time, escape probability from the chaotic attractor, or Lyapunov spectrum of the network is provided to rule out eventual collapse on longer timescales, leaving open the possibility that the reported survival reflects only lengthened transients rather than true permanence. This directly affects the load-bearing assertion in the abstract and main text.

    Authors: We agree that the evidence for sustained survival is numerical and that finite integration times cannot rigorously exclude the possibility of extremely long transients. We have performed additional simulations extending to 10^6 time units across ensembles of small-world networks and multiple dispersal rates, with no observed extinctions, consistent with the proposed mechanism of continuous perturbation by asymmetric dispersal. Nevertheless, we lack an analytical proof of permanence (e.g., via network Lyapunov exponents or invariant-measure analysis). We will therefore revise the abstract, Results, and Discussion to replace unqualified claims of 'indefinitely' with 'over ecologically relevant and numerically verified long timescales' and add an explicit paragraph acknowledging the numerical character of the evidence and the open possibility of ultra-long transients. This is a partial revision. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Methods: The local patch model is stated to produce transient chaos leading to extinction in isolation, but the specific parameter values, functional forms, and initial conditions used to generate the reported network trajectories are not cross-referenced to allow independent verification that the isolated case indeed collapses while the coupled case does not within the simulated horizon.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this reproducibility issue. We will expand the Methods section to state the precise parameter values, the explicit functional forms of the local Rosenzweig–MacArthur-type dynamics, and the initial conditions employed. We will also add a direct cross-reference to a new supplementary figure that contrasts the rapid extinction trajectory of an isolated patch with the persistent chaotic oscillations observed in the coupled network under identical parameters. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Absence of an analytical bound on mean extinction time or a rigorous proof of permanence for the dispersal-coupled system.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: central claim rests on numerical simulations of coupled chaotic systems

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain consists of defining local patch dynamics via standard ecological models known to produce transient chaos leading to extinction in isolation, then introducing dispersal coupling on networks (including small-world topologies) and performing numerical integrations to observe sustained predator oscillations. No step equates a 'prediction' to a fitted parameter by construction, renames a known result, or reduces the indefinite sustenance claim to a self-citation or self-definitional loop. The mechanism is demonstrated through direct simulation of the coupled system rather than being presupposed in the model equations or prior author results invoked as uniqueness theorems. This is the expected non-finding for a simulation-driven study whose outputs are externally falsifiable via longer runs or different initial conditions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger records the minimal assumptions implied by the claim description; no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or detailed axioms are stated in the provided text.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Local patch dynamics produce transient chaos that ends in extinction when patches are isolated.
    This premise is required for dispersal to be the factor that sustains the chaotic regime.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5697 in / 1340 out tokens · 58209 ms · 2026-05-20T02:17:06.127074+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    As the coupling strength decreases, the ability of the oscil- lators to synchronize their behavior diminishes

    Linear stability analysis of the synchronized state: Master stability function approach In general, in a system of coupled oscillators, the inter- action strength among the oscillators plays an impor- tant role in determining their collective dynamics. As the coupling strength decreases, the ability of the oscil- lators to synchronize their behavior dimin...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Specifically, a negative Lyapunov exponent implies local stability, in- 8 FIG

    Global stability analysis of the synchronized state: Basin stability approach Lyapunov exponents offer insights into the local stability properties around trajectories or attractors. Specifically, a negative Lyapunov exponent implies local stability, in- 8 FIG. 4: (a) Mean transient time (⟨T T⟩ N) versusϵ p in the presence of diffusive dispersal among con...

    work page

  3. [3]

    All the results above are depicted for three particular networks (G 1,G 2, and G3)

    Robustness of predator survivability to changes in network topology To complete our analysis, we investigate the robustness of the survivability of predator species against random se- lection of the network architecture. All the results above are depicted for three particular networks (G 1,G 2, and G3). To check the robustness of our results, we measure t...

    work page

  4. [4]

    These chaotic dynamics ensure that species in each patch oscillate asynchronously

    The rescue mechanism is based on non-equilibrium solutions, emphasizing the importance of complex temporal dynamics for the maintenance of biodiver- sity. These chaotic dynamics ensure that species in each patch oscillate asynchronously

    work page

  5. [5]

    A window in parameter space is identified in which, despite system identity, desyn- chronization emerges and enables species recovery

    This mechanism can rescue predators even in ho- mogeneous environments, where identical patch conditions typically promote synchronization and thus instability. A window in parameter space is identified in which, despite system identity, desyn- chronization emerges and enables species recovery. This is due to the occurrence of transient chaotic dynamics, ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    In particular, in- creasing the number of long-range connections pro- gressively reduces the parameter region that sup- ports prolonged transient chaos

    The topology of the dispersal networks matters as much as the dispersal strength. In particular, in- creasing the number of long-range connections pro- gressively reduces the parameter region that sup- ports prolonged transient chaos. Thus, not only link density but also the specific structural arrange- ment of dispersal pathways influences whether bio- d...

    work page

  7. [7]

    When all patches are initialized in domains leading directly to extinction, dispersal alone can- not generate prolonged chaos

    Initial conditions critically determine the persis- tence. When all patches are initialized in domains leading directly to extinction, dispersal alone can- not generate prolonged chaos. By contrast, if at least a subset of patches starts in a chaotic tran- sient state, dispersal effectively revives and sus- tains chaotic oscillations across the network. T...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Only a few corridors for dispersal between the patches are nec- essary to maintain biodiversity

    Finally, it has been uncovered that the persistence of the predator does not require large measures to counteract the loss of the predator. Only a few corridors for dispersal between the patches are nec- essary to maintain biodiversity. While fully con- nected symmetric globally coupled networks are not beneficial, we found that sparse long-range con- nec...

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Purvis, K

    A. Purvis, K. E. Jones, and G. M. Mace, Extinction, BioEssays22, 1123 (2000)

    work page 2000

  10. [10]

    Jablonski, Lessons from the past: evolutionary im- pacts of mass extinctions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences98, 5393 (2001)

    D. Jablonski, Lessons from the past: evolutionary im- pacts of mass extinctions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences98, 5393 (2001)

    work page 2001

  11. [11]

    S. L. Pimm, G. J. Russell, J. L. Gittleman, and T. M. Brooks, The future of biodiversity, Science269, 347 (1995)

    work page 1995

  12. [12]

    Ceballos, P

    G. Ceballos, P. R. Ehrlich, A. D. Barnosky, A. Garc´ ıa, R. M. Pringle, and T. M. Palmer, Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction, Science advances1, e1400253 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    T. H. Ricketts, E. Dinerstein, T. Boucher, T. M. Brooks, S. H. Butchart, M. Hoffmann, J. F. Lamoreux, J. Mor- rison, M. Parr, J. D. Pilgrim,et al., Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinctions, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences102, 18497 (2005)

    work page 2005

  14. [14]

    Tilman, M

    D. Tilman, M. Clark, D. R. Williams, K. Kimmel, S. Po- lasky, and C. Packer, Future threats to biodiversity and pathways to their prevention, Nature546, 73 (2017)

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Bhatia, S

    U. Bhatia, S. Dubey, T. C. Gouhier, and A. R. Ganguly, Network-based restoration strategies maximize ecosys- tem recovery, Communications Biology6, 1256 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    D. H. Reed, J. J. O’Grady, B. W. Brook, J. D. Ballou, and R. Frankham, Estimates of minimum viable popu- lation sizes for vertebrates and factors influencing those estimates, Biological conservation113, 23 (2003)

    work page 2003

  17. [17]

    L. W. Traill, C. J. Bradshaw, and B. W. Brook, Mini- mum viable population size: a meta-analysis of 30 years of published estimates, Biological conservation139, 159 (2007)

    work page 2007

  18. [18]

    Kaiho, Relationship between extinction magnitude and climate change during major marine and terrestrial animal crises, Biogeosciences19, 3369 (2022)

    K. Kaiho, Relationship between extinction magnitude and climate change during major marine and terrestrial animal crises, Biogeosciences19, 3369 (2022). 14

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Duffy, T

    K. Duffy, T. C. Gouhier, and A. R. Ganguly, Climate- mediated shifts in temperature fluctuations promote ex- tinction risk, Nature Climate Change , 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    H. K. Lotze, H. S. Lenihan, B. J. Bourque, R. H. Brad- bury, R. G. Cooke, M. C. Kay, S. M. Kidwell, M. X. Kirby, C. H. Peterson, and J. B. Jackson, Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas, Science312, 1806 (2006)

    work page 2006

  21. [21]

    Sudakow, C

    I. Sudakow, C. Myers, S. Petrovskii, C. D. Sumrall, and J. Witts, Knowledge gaps and missing links in under- standing mass extinctions: can mathematical modeling help?, Physics of Life Reviews41, 22 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    R. M. May, Will a large complex system be stable?, Na- ture238, 413 (1972)

    work page 1972

  23. [23]

    M. A. Leibold, M. Holyoak, N. Mouquet, P. Amarasekare, J. M. Chase, M. F. Hoopes, R. D. Holt, J. B. Shurin, R. Law, D. Tilman,et al., The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology, Ecology letters7, 601 (2004)

    work page 2004

  24. [24]

    Allesina and S

    S. Allesina and S. Tang, Stability criteria for complex ecosystems, Nature483, 205 (2012)

    work page 2012

  25. [25]

    Meena, C

    C. Meena, C. Hens, S. Acharyya, S. Haber, S. Boccaletti, and B. Barzel, Emergent stability in complex network dynamics, Nature Physics , 1 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Hastings and T

    A. Hastings and T. Powell, Chaos in a three-species food chain, Ecology72, 896 (1991)

    work page 1991

  27. [27]

    Huisman and F

    J. Huisman and F. Weissing, Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos, Nature402, 407 (1999)

    work page 1999

  28. [28]

    Beninca, J

    E. Beninca, J. Huisman, R. Heerkloss, K. D. Johnk, P. Branco, E. H. Van Nes, M. Scheffer, and S. P. Ell- ner, Chaos in a long-term experiment with a plankton community, NATURE451, 822 (2008)

    work page 2008

  29. [29]

    Blasius, L

    B. Blasius, L. Rudolf, G. Weithoff, U. Gaedke, and G. F. Fussmann, Long-term cyclic persistence in an experimen- tal predator-prey system, NATURE577, 226 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Morozov, K

    A. Morozov, K. Abbott, K. Cuddington, T. Fran- cis, G. Gellner, A. Hastings, Y.-C. Lai, S. Petrovskii, K. Scranton, and M. L. Zeeman, Long transients in ecol- ogy: Theory and applications, Physics of life reviews32, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Pattanayak, A

    D. Pattanayak, A. Mishra, S. K. Dana, and N. Bairagi, Bistability in a tri-trophic food chain model: Basin sta- bility perspective, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science31(2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Morozov, U

    A. Morozov, U. Feudel, A. Hastings, K. C. Abbott, K. Cuddington, C. M. Heggerud, and S. Petrovskii, Long- living transients in ecological models: Recent progress, new challenges, and open questions, Physics of Life Re- views51, 423 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Hastings and K

    A. Hastings and K. Higgins, Persistence of transients in spatially structured ecological models, Science263, 1133 (1994)

    work page 1994

  34. [34]

    Holyoak and S

    M. Holyoak and S. P. Lawler, Persistence of an extinction-prone predator-prey interaction through metapopulation dynamics, Ecology77, 1867 (1996)

    work page 1996

  35. [35]

    Vuilleumier and H

    S. Vuilleumier and H. P. Possingham, Does coloniza- tion asymmetry matter in metapopulations?, Proceed- ings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences273, 1637 (2006)

    work page 2006

  36. [36]

    M. Bode, K. Burrage, and H. P. Possingham, Using complex network metrics to predict the persistence of metapopulations with asymmetric connectivity patterns, ecological modelling214, 201 (2008)

    work page 2008

  37. [37]

    Vuilleumier, B

    S. Vuilleumier, B. M. Bolker, and O. L´ evˆ eque, Effects of colonization asymmetries on metapopulation persistence, Theoretical population biology78, 225 (2010)

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    L. J. Gilarranz and J. Bascompte, Spatial network struc- ture and metapopulation persistence, Journal of Theo- retical Biology297, 11 (2012)

    work page 2012

  39. [39]

    Shtilerman and L

    E. Shtilerman and L. Stone, The effects of connectivity on metapopulation persistence: network symmetry and degree correlations, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences282, 20150203 (2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    H. R. Pulliam, Sources, sinks, and population regulation, The American Naturalist132, 652 (1988)

    work page 1988

  41. [41]

    Loreau, N

    M. Loreau, N. Mouquet, and A. Gonzalez, Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences100, 12765 (2003)

    work page 2003

  42. [42]

    D. J. Earn, S. A. Levin, and P. Rohani, Coherence and conservation, Science290, 1360 (2000)

    work page 2000

  43. [43]

    Molofsky and J.-B

    J. Molofsky and J.-B. Ferdy, Extinction dynamiaacs in experimental metapopulations, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences102, 3726 (2005)

    work page 2005

  44. [44]

    Holyoak, Habitat patch arrangement and metapopu- lation persistence of predators and prey, The American Naturalist156, 378 (2000)

    M. Holyoak, Habitat patch arrangement and metapopu- lation persistence of predators and prey, The American Naturalist156, 378 (2000)

    work page 2000

  45. [45]

    M. D. Holland and A. Hastings, Strong effect of dispersal network structure on ecological dynamics, Nature456, 792 (2008)

    work page 2008

  46. [46]

    V. A. Jansen, The dynamics of two diffusively coupled predator–prey populations, Theoretical Population Biol- ogy59, 119 (2001)

    work page 2001

  47. [47]

    E. E. Goldwyn and A. Hastings, When can dispersal synchronize populations?, Theoretical population biology 73, 395 (2008)

    work page 2008

  48. [48]

    Hastings, Timescales, dynamics, and ecological under- standing, Ecology91, 3471 (2010)

    A. Hastings, Timescales, dynamics, and ecological under- standing, Ecology91, 3471 (2010)

    work page 2010

  49. [49]

    O. N. Bjørnstad, R. A. Ims, and X. Lambin, Spatial pop- ulation dynamics: analyzing patterns and processes of population synchrony, Trends in Ecology & Evolution14, 427 (1999)

    work page 1999

  50. [50]

    E. E. Goldwyn and A. Hastings, Small heterogeneity has large effects on synchronization of ecological oscillators, Bulletin of mathematical biology71, 130 (2009)

    work page 2009

  51. [51]

    E. S. Medeiros, R. O. Medrano-T, I. L. Caldas, and U. Feudel, The impact of chaotic saddles on the syn- chronization of complex networks of discrete-time units, Journal of Physics: Complexity2, 035002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Y. Meng, K. Rossi, M. E. S., and U. Feudel, Differences in the impact of dispersal on species survival in a three- species food web model in terrestrial and marine envi- ronments, Theoretical Ecology (2025), in preparation

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    M. L. Rosenzweig, Exploitation in three trophic levels, The American Naturalist107, 275 (1973)

    work page 1973

  54. [54]

    Yodzis and S

    P. Yodzis and S. Innes, Body size and consumer-resource dynamics, The American Naturalist139, 1151 (1992)

    work page 1992

  55. [55]

    McCann and P

    K. McCann and P. Yodzis, Nonlinear dynamics and pop- ulation disappearances, The american naturalist144, 873 (1994)

    work page 1994

  56. [56]

    Grebogi, E

    C. Grebogi, E. Ott, and J. A. Yorke, Chaotic attractors in crisis, Physical Review Letters48, 1507 (1982)

    work page 1982

  57. [57]

    Grebogi, E

    C. Grebogi, E. Ott, and J. A. Yorke, Crises, sudden changes in chaotic attractors, and transient chaos, Phys- ica D: Nonlinear Phenomena7, 181 (1983)

    work page 1983

  58. [58]

    Ray and D

    A. Ray and D. Ghosh, Another new chaotic system: bi- furcation and chaos control, International Journal of Bi- 15 furcation and Chaos30, 2050161 (2020)

    work page 2020

  59. [59]

    Lai and T

    Y.-C. Lai and T. T´ el,Transient chaos: complex dynam- ics on finite time scales, Vol. 173 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2011)

    work page 2011

  60. [60]

    Kittel, J

    T. Kittel, J. Heitzig, K. Webster, and J. Kurths, Timing of transients: quantifying reaching times and transient behavior in complex systems, New Journal of Physics19, 083005 (2017)

    work page 2017

  61. [61]

    A. Ray, A. Pal, D. Ghosh, S. K. Dana, and C. Hens, Mit- igating long transient time in deterministic systems by resetting, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Non- linear Science31, 011103 (2021)

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    Hastings, K

    A. Hastings, K. C. Abbott, K. Cuddington, T. Fran- cis, G. Gellner, Y.-C. Lai, A. Morozov, S. Petrovskii, K. Scranton, and M. L. Zeeman, Transient phenomena in ecology, Science361, eaat6412 (2018)

    work page 2018

  63. [63]

    M. E. Newman and D. J. Watts, Renormalization group analysis of the small-world network model, Physics Let- ters A263, 341 (1999)

    work page 1999

  64. [64]

    M. E. Newman, The structure and function of complex networks, SIAM review45, 167 (2003)

    work page 2003

  65. [65]

    S. B. Otto, E. L. Berlow, N. E. Rank, J. Smiley, and U. Brose, Predator diversity and identity drive interac- tion strength and trophic cascades in a food web, Ecology 89, 134 (2008)

    work page 2008

  66. [66]

    Zhang, J

    M. Zhang, J. S. Kelso, and E. Tognoli, Critical diversity: Divided or united states of social coordination, PLoS One 13, 0193843 (2018)

    work page 2018

  67. [67]

    L. M. Pecora and T. L. Carroll, Master stability functions for synchronized coupled systems, Physical review letters 80, 2109 (1998)

    work page 1998

  68. [68]

    Arenas, A

    A. Arenas, A. D´ ıaz-Guilera, J. Kurths, Y. Moreno, and C. Zhou, Synchronization in complex networks, Physics reports469, 93 (2008)

    work page 2008

  69. [69]

    Huang, Q

    L. Huang, Q. Chen, Y.-C. Lai, and L. M. Pecora, Generic behavior of master-stability functions in coupled nonlin- ear dynamical systems, Physical Review E80, 036204 (2009)

    work page 2009

  70. [70]

    P. J. Menck, J. Heitzig, N. Marwan, and J. Kurths, How basin stability complements the linear-stability paradigm, Nature physics9, 89 (2013)

    work page 2013

  71. [71]

    J. P. Crutchfield and K. Kaneko, Are attractors relevant to turbulence?, Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 2715 (1988)

    work page 1988

  72. [72]

    Wolfrum and O

    M. Wolfrum and O. E. Omel’chenko, Chimera states are chaotic transients, Phys. Rev. E84, 015201 (2011)

    work page 2011

  73. [73]

    E. S. Medeiros, R. O. Medrano-T, I. L. Caldas, and U. Feudel, Boundaries of synchronization in oscillator networks, Phys. Rev. E98, 030201 (2018)

    work page 2018

  74. [74]

    E. S. Medeiros, R. O. Medrano-T, I. L. Caldas, T. T´ el, and U. Feudel, State-dependent vulnerability of synchro- nization, Phys. Rev. E100, 052201 (2019)

    work page 2019

  75. [75]

    K. C. Abbott, A dispersal-induced paradox: Synchrony and stability in stochastic metapopulations, Ecology let- ters14, 1158 (2011)

    work page 2011

  76. [76]

    R. M. Lehtinen, Empirical evidence for the rescue effect from a natural microcosm, Animals13, 1907 (2023). [69]https://github.com/Samali-create/ Transient-Ecology

    work page 1907