Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 39 references

Exponential growth and decay in the ideal induction equation

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A periodic shear flow on the three-torus makes every divergence-free magnetic field grow exponentially.

desk verdict First deterministic universal ideal dynamo on T^3 with a clean, verifiable proof; deserves serious refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05997 v1 pith:O6PHLL4C submitted 2026-08-06 math.AP

Víctor Navarro-Fernández This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35Q4937D2076E25
keywords universalidealdynamoinductionequationuniformhyperbolicityconeconditionstablekernelpiecewiseaffineshearsexponentialdecaythree-torus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that a specific time-periodic, divergence-free velocity on the three-torus is a universal ideal dynamo: for large shear amplitude, every non-zero divergence-free seed field grows exponentially under the ideal induction equation. The velocity consists of three alternating piecewise-affine shears, driven by the tent function $h(s)=|s-\pi|$, and the proof shows that its time-one map is uniformly hyperbolic with a one-dimensional stable bundle that cannot contain any non-trivial divergence-free field. Consequently, for every $p\in[1,\infty]$, every non-zero divergence-free $B_0\in L^p(\mathbb{T}^3)$ satisfies $\|B(t,\cdot)\|_{L^p}\ge\delta_p(B_0)e^{\lambda_1 t}$ for all $t\ge0$, with $\lambda_1>0$ independent of $B_0$ and $p$. The paper also shows that the time-reversed velocity admits a bounded, divergence-free initial field whose solution decays exponentially in every $L^p$, the first periodic volume-preserving flow on the three-torus known to have this decay property. If the construction is correct, it provides a deterministic, periodic mechanism for exponential magnetic-energy growth in ideal MHD, where previous universal examples used stochastic or randomized flows.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the time-one map $T$ of the piecewise-affine shear flow, together with its eight derivative matrices $A_{a,b,c}$. The spectral asymmetry of these matrices creates invariant cones and a uniform hyperbolic splitting into a one-dimensional stable bundle $E^s$ and a two-dimensional unstable bundle $E^u$, which is what turns finite-time stretching into uniform exponential growth. The second essential mechanism is the covariant Piola transform: pulling back a smooth test field by $T^n$ costs a factor $\operatorname{Lip}(T)^n$ on the curl, while a field in the stable bundle contracts like $\Lambda_s^{-n}$. The strict bunching inequality $\operatorname{Lip}(T)<\Lambda_s$ makes the duality pairing vanish as $n\to\infty$, eliminating non-zero divergence-free fields from the stable kernel. On the decay side, the inverse map's two-dimensional stable bundle is filled using flat local unstable discs and a two-dimensional stream function.

What would settle it

Search for a non-zero divergence-free field $B_0\in L^2(\mathbb{T}^3)$ with $B_0(x)\in E^s(x)$ for almost every $x$; its existence would directly contradict Theorem 1.1, since such a field decays like $\Lambda_s^{-n}$. As a concrete numerical check, one can iterate the matrices $A_{a,b,c}$ along many orbits, measure the empirical contraction rate along the computed stable direction, and compare it with $\operatorname{Lip}(T)=\mathrm{ess\sup}\|DT\|$: if the ratio reaches or exceeds $1$ for some $\alpha\ge\alpha_0$, the bunching step of the proof breaks down.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1: for the shear velocity $u_\alpha$ defined in (1.5) there is a threshold $\alpha_0$ such that for all $\alpha\ge\alpha_0$, every non-zero divergence-free initial field in $L^p(\mathbb{T}^3)$, $1\le p\le\infty$, grows at least like $\delta_p(B_0)e^{\lambda_1 t}$, with $\lambda_1>0$ independent of the seed and of $p$. The proof identifies the time-one map $T=T_3\circ T_2\circ T_1$ with derivative matrices $A_{a,b,c}$ whose spectrum has one eigenvalue of size $\alpha^{-3}$ and two of size $\alpha^{3/2}$. From these matrices it derives a uniform cone condition and a measurable hyperbolic splitting $E^s(x)\oplus E^u(x)$, so any field with nonzero unstable component grows like $\Lambda_u^n$. The remaining obstruction is the stable kernel, fields lying almost everywhere in the one-dimensional $E^s$; the author rules it out by a covariant-Piola argument that uses the strict bunching inequality $\operatorname{Lip}(T)<\Lambda_s$, which holds because $\operatorname{Lip}(T)\asymp\alpha^2$ and $\Lambda_s\asymp\alpha^3$. For the time-reversed flow, whose time-one map is $T^{-1}$, the relevant stable bundle is the original two-dimensional $E^u$, and a stream-function construction on flat unstable discs produces a non-zero bounded divergence-free field in it, giving exponential decay.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the strict bunching inequality $\operatorname{Lip}(T)<\Lambda_s$: the time-one map's maximal stretch, which grows like $\alpha^2$, must stay below the rate $\Lambda_s\asymp\alpha^3$ at which vectors in the stable direction contract. If a different shear profile or amplitude changed these scalings so the inequality failed, the proof could no longer rule out a divergence-free field hiding in the stable bundle.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every $p\in[1,\infty]$, any non-zero divergence-free $B_0\in L^p(\mathbb{T}^3)$ satisfies $\|B(t,\cdot)\|_{L^p}\ge\delta_p(B_0)e^{\lambda_1 t}$ for all $t\ge0$, with $\lambda_1>0$ independent of $B_0$ and $p$; no divergence-free seed can avoid exponential stretching.
  • The growth is not uniform in the seed: the prefactor $\delta_p(B_0)$ is proportional to $\|P^uB_0\|_{L^p}$ and can be arbitrarily small even for normalized fields, so exponential growth can set in after an arbitrarily long transient.
  • The stable kernel is trivial: no non-zero divergence-free $L^p$ vector field can lie almost everywhere in the one-dimensional stable bundle, which is exactly the condition that upgrades conditional growth to universal growth.
  • The time-reversed flow yields what the paper identifies as the first periodic volume-preserving flow on the three-torus with exponential magnetic-energy decay: a non-zero, bounded, divergence-free, mean-free initial field satisfies $\|B(t,\cdot)\|_{L^p}\le C e^{-\lambda_2 t}\|B_0\|_{L^p}$ for all $p\in[1,\infty]$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The proof's structure suggests a general recipe: any periodic piecewise-affine shear flow on $\mathbb{T}^3$ whose time-one map is uniformly hyperbolic with a one-dimensional stable bundle and satisfies $\operatorname{Lip}(T)<\Lambda_s$ should be a universal ideal dynamo, so the matrix calculus here could be repeated for other tent-like profiles.
  • Because the argument is spectral and geometric rather than tied to the exact tent function, one could test numerically whether smoother shear profiles preserve the scaling $\operatorname{Lip}(T)\asymp\alpha^2$ with $\Lambda_s\asymp\alpha^3$; if the ordering survives, the dynamo property would extend beyond the piecewise-affine class.
  • The non-coercivity of the unstable projection implies that universal growth is an injectivity statement, not a uniform lower bound; a practical consequence is that simulations or experiments need information about $\|P^uB_0\|$, not just $\|B_0\|$, to predict when exponential growth becomes visible.
  • If the same velocity could be shown to mix passive scalars exponentially, it would complete the two-dimensional analogy between mixing and dynamo in three dimensions; the paper leaves this open, and the cone-condition method developed here may be a useful step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a divergence-free, time-periodic, Lipschitz velocity field u_alpha on T^3, given by three alternating piecewise-affine shears. The main result (Theorem 1.1) asserts that for all sufficiently large shear amplitude alpha, every non-zero divergence-free initial field in L^p(T^3), 1 <= p <= infinity, grows exponentially in every L^p norm under the ideal induction equation; thus u_alpha is a universal ideal dynamo. The proof establishes a uniform cone condition for the time-one map, derives a measurable uniformly hyperbolic splitting, and proves a bunching inequality Lip(T) < Lambda_s, which is used to rule out non-zero divergence-free fields in the one-dimensional stable bundle. The paper also proves a time-reversal counterpart (Theorem 1.2): for the reversed velocity, there is a non-zero bounded divergence-free initial field lying in the two-dimensional stable bundle, whose solution decays exponentially in every L^p. An appendix treats the simpler non-universal dynamo mechanism generated by a hyperbolic point.

Significance. This is a notable contribution. It appears to give the first deterministic, time-periodic Lipschitz universal ideal dynamo on T^3 and the first periodic volume-preserving flow on T^3 with exponentially decaying magnetic energy, addressing questions related to Arnold's dynamo problem. The proof is self-contained and transparent: the main constants arise from explicit spectral calculations for the eight matrices in (2.2), and the decisive bunching inequality is verified by the clean scaling Lip(T) ~ alpha^2 versus Lambda_s ~ alpha^3. The paper is also honest about the limitations of the result: the lower-bound constant can be arbitrarily small, and Lemma 4.3 shows that no uniform coercivity of the unstable projector holds. I found no flaw threatening the central claims.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1, near (1.2) and before Theorem 1.1] The statement that (1.2) is the unique L^p distributional solution for the time-discontinuous Lipschitz velocity u_alpha is asserted without proof or reference. This is standard DiPerna-Lions theory for divergence-free Lipschitz transports, but because it is part of the PDE claim, I recommend adding a precise statement or a reference.
  2. [Lemma 4.2, endpoint cases] The proof of the integration-by-parts identity for p=1 and p=infinity is compressed into the sentence 'after a suitable mollification'; since the theorem claims all 1 <= p <= infinity, please spell out the mollification argument or cite the standard approximation result.
  3. [Proposition 2.2, final paragraph] The assertion that the global cones C^u and C^s have nonempty interior, and hence positive three-dimensional measure, is made via 'strict versions' of the preceding inequalities; a short uniformity argument, for instance using Lemma 2.2 to see that all local unstable and stable spaces lie within O(alpha^{-1}) of e_1^perp and span{e_1}, would make this fully explicit.
  4. [Appendix A versus Section 1.6] The notation 'eu' denotes the unstable direction in Appendix A but is close to the notation 'eu_alpha' introduced in (1.6) for the reversed velocity; renaming one of them would avoid confusion.
  5. [Section 2.2 and Section 3] The definition of mu before (2.5) should be double-checked so that it reads mu = lambda - 1, and the stray footnote marker in 'DT^n(x)1' in Section 3 should be removed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: every load-bearing ingredient (cone condition, hyperbolic splitting, bunching inequality, stable-kernel triviality) is derived within the paper; self-citations are contextual only.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The velocity field u_alpha in (1.5) is an explicit new construction, and each step of the proof is established in the manuscript: the uniform cone condition (Proposition 2.2 and Corollary 2.1), the measurable hyperbolic splitting (Proposition 3.1), the conditional growth estimate (Proposition 3.2), and the triviality of the stable kernel (Lemma 4.2). The decisive bunching inequality Lip(T)<Lambda_s is verified rather than assumed: the paper derives Lip(T) <= sqrt(alpha^4+3alpha^2+3) ~ alpha^2 and Lambda_s >= delta alpha^3, so the ratio is O(alpha^{-1}) and the strict inequality holds for large alpha. Lemma 4.2's covariant-Piola estimate (4.9) is an independent a priori estimate; no fitted parameter is introduced and no predicted quantity is used as an input. The only self-citation of note, [11], appears in the introduction as background ('More recently, in [11] an example of an almost-sure universal ideal dynamo is constructed in T^3'), and none of the paper's estimates depend on it. The explicit caveats in Section 4.1 (the non-coercivity of P^u) and the open question about scalar mixing in the introduction are honest limitations, not hidden circular steps. The unproved standard fact that (1.2) gives the unique L^p distributional solution is stated in the preamble but is not load-bearing for the circularity analysis and does not make the derivation circular. In short, the core argument does not reduce by construction or by self-citation to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or extra dimensions are introduced. The only constructed object is the velocity field u_alpha and its time-one map, which are the subject of the paper rather than ad hoc explanatory entities. The single free parameter is the shear amplitude alpha, an existential threshold, not a fitted constant.

free parameters (1)
  • Shear amplitude alpha = alpha >= alpha_0 (sufficiently large)
    The shear amplitude alpha is chosen sufficiently large. The proofs require alpha large enough for eigenvalue separation, the cone condition, and the bunching inequality; no data are fitted.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The push-forward of an L^p initial datum by the flow map gives the unique distributional solution of the ideal induction equation (1.1) for Lipschitz divergence-free u.
    Stated in Section 1 after formula (1.2) without proof; all subsequent growth and decay estimates are proven for this Lagrangian solution.
  • standard math A uniform cone condition implies a measurable uniformly hyperbolic splitting with exponential expansion and contraction constants (Corollary 2.1).
    Used in Proposition 3.1; the paper gives a proof adapted to the piecewise affine map, following classical hyperbolic theory.
  • standard math The Coulomb kernel K = curl(-Delta)^{-1} satisfies |K(x)| less than or similar to |x|^{-2}, is in L^1(T^3), and Young's inequality gives ||A_n||_{L^p} less than or similar to ||B_n||_{L^p}.
    Used in Lemma 4.2; cited to [4].
  • domain assumption The measure estimate |{x : dist(x, Gamma) < delta}| <= C_Gamma delta holds for all delta <= 1, where Gamma = S union T(S) is a finite union of Lipschitz hypersurfaces.
    Used in Lemma 5.1's Borel-Cantelli argument; follows from the piecewise affine structure of the time-one map.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exponential growth and decay in the ideal induction equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O6PHLL4C

@misc{pith2026260805997,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exponential growth and decay in the ideal induction equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O6PHLL4C}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05997}
}
abstract

We construct a divergence-free velocity field on the three-dimensional torus that is time-periodic and consists of three alternating piecewise-affine shears. For sufficiently large shear amplitude, every non-zero divergence-free initial field in $L^p$ grows exponentially under the ideal induction equation. The proof establishes a uniform cone condition for the time-one map, and combines it with a bunching inequality to rule out nontrivial divergence-free fields lying almost everywhere in the stable bundle. Additionally, we show that for the time-reversed velocity, whose time-one map is the inverse of the original one, there exist nontrivial, bounded, divergence-free initial configurations taking values almost everywhere in its two-dimensional stable bundle. The corresponding solution decays exponentially in every $L^p$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05997 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Sections of the singular set S for α = 2 (left) and α = 4 (right). Since the shears are affine, they have the property that the gradient matrix on each connected component Rε1,ε2,ε3 is given by a matrix with real coefficients. More in detail, consider a point x ∈ Rε1,ε2,ε3 and define a = αε1, b = αε2, and c = αε3. Then the chain rule gives (2.2) DT(x) = Aa,b,c =   1 a 0 0 1 b c ac 1   . Thus all eight sign choic… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Cartoon of the stable cones for matrices of the form (2.2) corresponding to a = b = α (red), a = b = −α (green), a = −b = α (blue), a = −b = −α (orange), and always a = c. We plotted θ = 1/2 and α = 4 (left), α = 8 (right). Remark 2.1. This lemma shows that the spectral radius of Aa,b,c scales like ρ(Aa,b,c) ≍ α 3/2 , whereas one can see that the largest singular value scales like σmax(Aa,b,c) = ∥Aa,b,c∥ ≍ α 2 . For… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Alberti, G

    G. Alberti, G. Crippa, and A. L. Mazzucato,Exponential self-similar mixing by incompressible flows, J. Amer. Math. Soc.32(2019), no. 2, 445–490. MR3904158

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    V. I. Arnold,Arnold’s problems, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    V. I. Arnold and B. A. Khesin,Topological methods in hydrodynamics, Second, Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 125, Springer, Cham, [2021]©2021. MR4268535

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Aubin,Nonlinear analysis on manifolds

    T. Aubin,Nonlinear analysis on manifolds. Monge-Amp` ere equations, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wis- senschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 252, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982. MR681859

    work page 1982

  5. [5]

    P. H. Baxendale and B. L. Rozovskii,Kinematic dynamo and intermittence in a turbulent flow, Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics73(1993), no. 1-4, 33–60

    1993

  6. [6]

    Bedrossian, A

    J. Bedrossian, A. Blumenthal, and S. Punshon-Smith,Almost-sure exponential mixing of passive scalars by the stochastic Navier-Stokes equations, Ann. Probab.50(2022), no. 1, 241–303. MR4385127

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Blumenthal, M

    A. Blumenthal, M. Coti Zelati, and R. S. Gvalani,Exponential mixing for random dynamical systems and an example of Pierrehumbert, Ann. Probab.51(2023), no. 4, 1559–1601. MR4597327

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Bru` e, M

    E. Bru` e, M. Coti Zelati, and E. Marconi,Enhanced dissipation for two-dimensional Hamiltonian flows, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.248(2024), no. 5, Paper No. 84, 37. MR4797689

    work page 2024

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    Childress and A

    S. Childress and A. D. Gilbert,Stretch, twist, fold: The fast dynamo, First, Monographs, vol. 37, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008

    2008

  2. [10]

    Cooperman and K

    W. Cooperman and K. Rowan,Exponential scalar mixing for the 2D Navier-Stokes equations with degenerate stochastic forcing, Invent. Math.243(2026), no. 3, 863–959. MR5008155

    2026

  3. [11]

    Coti Zelati and V

    M. Coti Zelati and V. Navarro-Fern´ andez,Three-dimensional exponential mixing and ideal kinematic dynamo with randomized ABC flows, J. Dyn. Diff. Equat. (2026)

    2026

  4. [12]

    Coti Zelati, M

    M. Coti Zelati, M. Sorella, and D. Villringer,Alpha-unstable flows and the fast dynamo problem, 2025. Preprint arXiv:2504.00855. 30 V. NA V ARRO-FERN ´ANDEZ

    2025 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Coti Zelati, M

    M. Coti Zelati, M. Sorella, and D. Villringer,A fast dynamo on the three-torus, 2026. Preprint arXiv:2603.09861

    2026 arXiv

  6. [14]

    T. G. Cowling,The magnetic field of sunspots, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.94(1933), 39–48

    1933

  7. [15]

    P. A. Davidson,An introduction to magnetohydrodynamics, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics, Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001. MR1825486

    2001

  8. [16]

    Del Nin, D

    G. Del Nin, D. Faraco, S. Lindberg, and F. Mengual,Turbulent dynamos on bounded domains and their gener- alization to the geometric transport equation, 2026. Preprint arXiv:2605.20451

    2026 arXiv

  9. [17]

    M. F. Demers and C. Liverani,Stability of statistical properties in two-dimensional piecewise hyperbolic maps, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.360(2008), no. 9, 4777–4814. MR2403704

    2008

  10. [18]

    T. M. Elgindi, K. Liss, and J. C. Mattingly,Optimal enhanced dissipation and mixing for a time-periodic, Lipschitz velocity field onT 2, Duke Math. J.174(2025), no. 7, 1209–1260. MR4912975

    2025

  11. [19]

    T. M. Elgindi and A. Zlatoˇ s,Universal mixers in all dimensions, Adv. Math.356(2019), 106807, 33. MR4008523

    2019

  12. [20]

    M. H. Freedman,Zeldovich’s neutron star and the prediction of magnetic froth, The Arnoldfest (Toronto, ON, 1997), 1999, pp. 165–172. MR1733574

    1997

  13. [21]

    A. D. Gilbert,Fast dynamo action in the Ponomarenko dynamo, Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics 44(1988), no. 1-4, 241–258

    1988

  14. [22]

    A. D. Gilbert and J. Vanneste,A geometric look at MHD and the Braginsky dynamo, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn.115(2021), no. 4, 436–471. MR4301417

    2021

  15. [23]

    Katok and B

    A. Katok and B. Hasselblatt,Introduction to the modern theory of dynamical systems, Encyclopedia of Math- ematics and its Applications, vol. 54, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995. With a supplementary chapter by Katok and Leonardo Mendoza. MR1326374

    1995

  16. [24]

    Larmor,Possible rotational origin of magnetic fields of Sun and Earth, Electrical Review85(1919), no

    J. Larmor,Possible rotational origin of magnetic fields of Sun and Earth, Electrical Review85(1919), no. 512

    1919

  17. [25]

    K. L. Liss and J. C. Mattingly,The Batchelor spectrum for a deterministically driven passive scalar, 2026. Preprint arXiv:2603.08904

    2026

  18. [26]

    J. E. Marsden and T. J. R. Hughes,Mathematical foundations of elasticity, Dover Publications, Inc., New York,

  19. [27]

    H. K. Moffatt,Magnetic field generation in electrically conducting fluids, Cambridge University Press, 1978

    1978

  20. [28]

    Navarro-Fern´ andez and C

    V. Navarro-Fern´ andez and C. Seis,Exponential mixing by random cellular flows, J. Funct. Anal.290(2026), no. 2, Paper No. 111227, 54. MR4973604

    2026

  21. [29]

    Navarro-Fern´ andez and D

    V. Navarro-Fern´ andez and D. Villringer,Spectral instability in the smooth Ponomarenko dynamo, 2025. Preprint arXiv:2509.19201

    2025

  22. [30]

    Navarro-Fern´ andez and D

    V. Navarro-Fern´ andez and D. Villringer,Nonlinear instability for the 3D MHD equations around the Taylor- Couette flow, Nonlinearity39(2026), no. 5, Paper No. 055009, 11. MR5073797

    2026

  23. [31]

    Niebel,An autonomous Lipschitz fast dynamo on the three-torus, 2026

    L. Niebel,An autonomous Lipschitz fast dynamo on the three-torus, 2026. Preprint arXiv:2608.02586

    2026 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Rowan,A subsequentially fast dynamo onT 3, 2025

    K. Rowan,A subsequentially fast dynamo onT 3, 2025. Preprint arXiv:2505.23936

    2025 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Sorella and D

    M. Sorella and D. Villringer,A limsup fast dynamo onT 3, 2025. Preprint arXiv:2511.23024

    2025

  26. [34]

    Teschl,Ordinary differential equations and dynamical systems, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol

    G. Teschl,Ordinary differential equations and dynamical systems, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 140, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2012. MR2961944

    2012

  27. [35]

    Villringer,On spectral instability and kinematic dynamo action in three-dimensional incompressible flows, Ph.D

    D. Villringer,On spectral instability and kinematic dynamo action in three-dimensional incompressible flows, Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College London, UK, 2026

    2026

  28. [36]

    M. M. Vishik,Magnetic field generation by the motion of a highly conducting fluid, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dynam.48(1989), no. 1-3, 151–167. MR1024693

    1989

  29. [37]

    Ya. B. Zeldovich, A. A. Ruzmaikin, S. A. Molchanov, and D. D. Sokoloff,Kinematic dynamo problem in a linear velocity field, Journal of Fluid Mechanics144(1984), 1–11

    1984

  30. [38]

    Y. B. Zeldovich and A. A. Ruzmaikin,Magnetic field of a conducting fluid in two-dimensional motion, Zhurnal Eksperimental’noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki78(1980), 980–986. (VNF) Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, UK Email address:v.navarro-fernandez@imperial.ac.uk

    1980

  31. [1994]

    MR1262126

    Corrected reprint of the 1983 original. MR1262126

    1983

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.