Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Almost abelian pseudo-K\"ahler Lie algebras

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Every almost abelian pseudo-Kähler Lie algebra is shown to belong, up to unitary isomorphism, to one of seven explicitly described families.

desk verdict A solid all-dimensional classification of almost abelian pseudo-Kähler Lie algebras, with one load-bearing orbit-reduction step that is asserted rather than proved. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.22278 v2 pith:OBB2ZW2G submitted 2025-06-27 math.DG

Diego Conti , Alejandro Gil-García This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DG MSC 53C1553C5053C5522E25
keywords almostabelianLiealgebraspseudo-KählerstructuressolvmanifoldsunitaryorbitsJordantypenilpotentEinsteinmetricsindefinite
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Almost abelian Lie algebras are two-step solvable Lie algebras of the form g = h ⋊_D R with h abelian. This paper studies invariant pseudo-Kähler structures on them and establishes a complete classification: up to isomorphisms preserving both the complex structure and the indefinite metric, every such algebra lies in one of seven families g0,...,g6 built from the unitary-orbit data of a skew-Hermitian operator. It also characterizes exactly which almost abelian Lie algebras admit any pseudo-Kähler structure in terms of the Jordan type of the derivation D: in the nilpotent case, a complex structure automatically forces a compatible pseudo-Kähler metric, while outside the nilpotent case there are almost abelian Lie algebras with both complex and symplectic structures but no compatible pseudo-Kähler metric, and these exceptions are classified. The curvature of the constructed metrics is computed, and some Ricci-flat examples are used to build Einstein pseudo-Kähler metrics in two dimensions higher.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the language of blocks: a block is a triple (V,h,A) consisting of a complex vector space, a Hermitian form, and a skew-Hermitian endomorphism, with the relevant types being Δ_m^±(ζ) for ζ ∈ iR and Δ_m(ζ,−ζ) for Re ζ > 0. The paper forms the free abelian semigroup U of formal sums of blocks, so an element t encodes a vector space with a Hermitian form and skew-Hermitian endomorphism A(t), and the map s(t)=(p,q) records the signature. The classification of unitary adjoint orbits (Theorem 3.1) makes such blocks the normal form for every skew-Hermitian endomorphism; the compatibility equations force the derivation D into block form through Theorems 1.1 and 1.2, while the stabilizer computation in Lemma 3.7 describes how unitary changes of frame transform the parameters, and Lemma 3.3 normalizes the residual vector v using the set X_t of nonnegative coordinate maps satisfying condition (10).

What would settle it

A concrete check would be to take t = Δ_{m1}^{ε1}(0)+Δ_{m2}^{ε2}(0) with distinct block sizes or signs and inspect whether some vector (u1,u2) in W is H-equivalent to a vector of the form x1 v(Δ1)+x2 v(Δ2) with xi nonnegative and either x1x2=0 or x1=x2=1; if a vector were found whose stabilizer orbit avoids all such v(x), Theorem 3.4 would miss a family.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is Theorem 3.4: every almost abelian pseudo-Kähler Lie algebra is unitarily isomorphic to one of the model algebras g_i(t,...), i=0,...,6, constructed from a type t in the semigroup generated by blocks Δ_m^±(ζ) and Δ_m(ζ,−ζ); the only identifications among the models are the listed ones, including the involution t ↦ r(t), a ↦ −a, and the rescalings A(t)=kA(t') for the families g2 and g6. Theorem 4.4 then reformulates the existence of a pseudo-Kähler structure as a condition on the Jordan type j(D) of the derivation, namely j(D) ∈ J0(α)+Q, Jm(0)+J_{m+1}(0)+Q, or J0(α)+2J0(−α)+Q. A corollary is that every nilpotent almost abelian Lie algebra with a complex structure admits a compatible pseudo-Kähler metric, while Theorem 4.9 classifies the non-nilpotent exceptions, which have Jordan type 2J_m(−c)+J_m(c)+J_{m+1}(c)+Q with c≠0.

Load-bearing premise

The classification rests on the assumption that every vector in a complementary subspace W of Im A(t), for t a sum of nilpotent blocks, lies in the same stabilizer orbit as a normalized vector v(x) with x ∈ X_t; the proof of this orbit normal form is detailed only for a single repeated block and for a pair of opposite blocks, with the general mixture asserted by combining the two arguments.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A complete list, in every dimension, of the unitary isomorphism classes of almost abelian pseudo-Kähler Lie algebras, so questions about such structures reduce to finite data: a type t, real scalar parameters, and a vector in X_t.
  • Every nilpotent almost abelian Lie algebra carrying a complex structure carries a compatible pseudo-Kähler metric; moreover its first Betti number is at least three (Proposition 1.5).
  • The coexistence gap is exactly characterized: an almost abelian Lie algebra admits complex and symplectic structures but no compatible pseudo-Kähler metric precisely when j(D) ∈ 2J_m(−c)+J_m(c)+J_{m+1}(c)+Q with c≠0 (Theorem 4.9).
  • Curvature is controlled: non-isotropic examples are algebraic Ricci solitons, isotropic examples are Ricci-flat, and unimodular or nilpotent examples are flat and complete (Corollaries 2.2, 2.4, 2.6).
  • Some of the Ricci-flat metrics yield explicit Einstein pseudo-Kähler metrics in two dimensions higher, with an eight-dimensional list given in Proposition 5.6.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending beyond the paper, the same block-orbit machinery might classify other invariant structures on almost abelian Lie algebras whose compatibility equations have the same rigidity, such as hypersymplectic or Born structures, whenever the structure group is a unitary group with indefinite signature.
  • The Jordan-type gap in Theorem 4.9 suggests a testable heuristic: the obstruction to a compatible pseudo-Kähler metric is carried by paired real Jordan blocks of unequal sizes with opposite nonzero eigenvalues; one could search low dimensions for the smallest example where complex and symplectic structures coexist but no compatible metric does.
  • The Einstein extension construction of Section 5 depends only on the algebraic data in Proposition 5.5, so the same conditions could in principle be scanned algorithmically over the families g0,...,g6 to list Einstein pseudo-Kähler examples beyond dimension eight.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper classifies invariant pseudo-Kähler structures on almost abelian Lie algebras, i.e. semidirect products h ⋊_D R with h abelian, up to unitary isomorphism. The authors first characterize the derivation D in two cases depending on whether the metric restricted to h^⊥ ⊕ J h^⊥ is nondegenerate (Theorem 1.1) or isotropic (Theorem 1.2). They then introduce a block formalism based on the Burgoyne–Cushman classification of U(p,q)-orbits and state a full classification into seven families g_0,...,g_6 (Theorem 3.4), with explicit lists in dimensions six and eight. The paper further characterizes, by Jordan type, which almost abelian Lie algebras admit a pseudo-Kähler structure (Theorem 4.4), deduces that every nilpotent almost abelian Lie algebra with a complex structure admits a compatible pseudo-Kähler metric (Corollary 4.5), classifies almost abelian Lie algebras admitting complex and symplectic structures but no compatible pseudo-Kähler metric (Theorem 4.9), and studies curvature, showing algebraic-Ricci-soliton behavior in the non-isotropic case and Ricci-flatness in the isotropic case. The final section constructs pseudo-Kähler–Einstein extensions in two dimensions higher using [14].

Significance. If the classification is correct, it is a substantial result: it gives a complete, all-dimension classification of almost abelian pseudo-Kähler Lie algebras up to unitary isomorphism, and it provides a clean Jordan-type criterion for the existence of a pseudo-Kähler structure. The paper is explicitly computational and careful: Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 are derived in detail, the low-dimensional lists in Section 3.3 agree with known classifications in dimensions four and six (Examples 1.3 and 1.4), and the curvature computations in Section 2 are explicit and checkable. The use of the Burgoyne–Cushman orbit classification is appropriate, and the classification is not circular: it does not assume the pseudo-Kähler structures it aims to classify. The strongest claims—Theorem 3.4 and Theorem 4.4—are therefore significant and will be useful for further work on pseudo-Kähler solvmanifolds, Einstein metrics, and related geometries.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.1, Lemma 3.3] Lemma 3.3 is the load-bearing step for the completeness of the isotropic families g_2 and g_3 in Theorem 3.4, but its proof only verifies the two model cases t = n∆ and t = ∆^+_m(0) + ∆^-_m(0), and then asserts that the general case follows by combining the two arguments. This is not immediate. For a general t with several nilpotent blocks, all of which have eigenvalue 0, the stabilizer H does not act as a product of independent unitary groups on the complement W: intertwiners can mix top vectors from blocks of different sizes, and the generalized eigenspace of A(t) for the eigenvalue 0 is the whole nilpotent part, so the uniqueness argument based on preservation of generalized eigenspaces does not separate the summands. If an orbit were missed in this reduction, the seven-family classification would be incomplete. The author should provide a complete proof that every w ∈ W is H-equivalent to a unique v(x) with x ∈ X_t, including the mixed-multiplicity and mixed-size cases, or explicitly derive the normal form for general t.
  2. [§3.2, proof of Theorem 3.4] The step in the isotropic case that reduces v to v(x) via Lemma 3.3 is used to assert that the families D_2(t,x) and D_3(t,x) exhaust the case v ≠ 0. Since this is exactly where Lemma 3.3 is invoked, the completeness claim for the classification is contingent on the previous point. If Lemma 3.3 is repaired, the rest of the proof of Theorem 3.4 appears coherent; but as written, the isotropic classification is not fully supported.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4, proof of Theorem 4.4] The proof begins with 'Suppose R^{2n-1} ⋊_D R is an abelian pseudo-Kähler Lie algebra'; this should read 'almost abelian'.
  2. [§3.4, Proposition 3.13] In the bullets for the neutral-signature isotropic case, the notation 'g_i(t_1,x), i = 1, 2' and 'g_i(t_2,x), i = 1, 2' appears to refer to the families g_2 and g_3, not g_1 and g_2; the displayed matrices are D_2 and D_3.
  3. [§3.1, Eq. (10)] The condition on X_t is stated as 'x(∆+_m(0))x(∆−_m(0)) = 0 or x(∆+_m(0)) = 1 = x(∆−_m(0))'; it may help to add an explicit quantifier over m to avoid ambiguity for readers.
  4. [§3.4, §3.3] The low-dimensional statements group matrices into equations (19), (20), (27)–(32) without always labeling which family each matrix belongs to; labelling each matrix with its g_i-family would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the classification is built from external orbit classifications and prior complex/symplectic results; the self-citations that appear are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central classification (Theorem 3.4) is not circular. The pseudo-Kähler conditions are derived directly in Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 from Nijenhuis integrability and dω = 0, giving explicit normal forms for the derivation D. The block language and the families g0,...,g6 are then obtained by applying the external Burgoyne–Cushman classification of U(p,q) adjoint orbits (Theorem 3.1), not by assuming the pseudo-Kähler structures being classified. Theorem 4.4 and Corollary 4.5 likewise rest on the external complex/symplectic classifications of [5] and a Jordan-type computation; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The only self-citations are [13], cited as background for a conjecture, and [14], used as an application vehicle in Section 5; neither is load-bearing for the main classification, and [14] is a published construction whose assumptions do not include the target results. The proof of Lemma 3.3 compresses the general orbit-reduction case, but that is a potential completeness gap, not a circular reduction; the normal form is not defined in terms of the classification it supports. The score reflects only the presence of minor non-load-bearing self-citations, not any circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; the real parameters a, c1, c2 and the vector v are classification labels describing examples, not free inputs chosen to force conclusions. The block language is bookkeeping for the Burgoyne-Cushman orbit classification. The axioms are standard linear algebra and prior classification theorems, and the central derivation does not assume the existence of the pseudo-Kähler metrics it classifies.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Classification of skew-Hermitian endomorphisms up to U(p,q)-conjugacy (Burgoyne-Cushman, Theorem 3.1).
    Invoked in Section 3.1 to replace A(t) by a block normal form; without it the families g0..g6 would not cover all U(p,q)-orbits.
  • domain assumption Freibert's criterion that an isomorphism between almost abelian Lie algebras preserves the codimension-one abelian ideal, except for abelian algebras and heis3 ⊕ R^k (Lemma 3.5, [23]).
    Used in Lemma 3.6 and Theorem 3.4 to rule out unexpected unitary isomorphisms between families.
  • domain assumption The classifications of almost abelian Lie algebras with complex or symplectic structures from [5] (Theorems 4.1, 4.2, 4.6, 4.7 stated in Section 4).
    Theorems 4.4, 4.9 and Corollary 4.5 compare the pseudo-Kähler Jordan-type condition against these prior classifications.
  • domain assumption The pseudo-Kähler-Einstein extension construction of [14, Corollary 3.6] (Proposition 5.1).
    Section 5 applies this known construction to produce Einstein metrics in two dimensions higher.
  • standard math Completeness criterion for flat left-symmetric connections from [43] used in Corollary 2.6.
    Bridges flatness of the Levi-Civita connection to completeness of the resulting pseudo-Riemannian manifold.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Almost abelian pseudo-K\"ahler Lie algebras." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OBB2ZW2G

@misc{pith2026250622278,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Almost abelian pseudo-K\"ahler Lie algebras},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OBB2ZW2G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.22278}
}
abstract

We study invariant pseudo-K\"ahler structures on a solvmanifold $G$ such that the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ is almost abelian, that is $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{h}\rtimes\mathbb{R}$, with $\mathfrak{h}$ abelian; comparing with the positive-definite case, an additional situation occurs, corresponding to the ideal $\mathfrak{h}$ being degenerate. We obtain a classification up to unitary isomorphism in all dimensions. We deduce that every nilpotent almost abelian Lie algebra endowed with a complex structure also admits a compatible pseudo-K\"ahler structure, and prove that this is no longer true for general almost abelian Lie algebras; indeed, we classify all the almost abelian Lie algebras that admit a complex structure and a symplectic structure but no compatible pseudo-K\"ahler metric. We study the curvature of the metrics we have obtained, and use some of them to construct Einstein pseudo-K\"ahler metrics in two dimensions higher.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The moduli spaces of presymplectic forms on almost abelian Lie algebras

    math.DG 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    On every almost abelian Lie algebra, presymplectic forms of rank R exist exactly when a rank formula in the Jordan data of ad_e holds, and symplectic forms form a finite moduli space, each class a permuted canonical form.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [5]

    R. M. Arroyo, M. L. Barberis, V. S. Diaz, Y. Godoy, and I. Hernández,Classification of almost abelian Lie groups admitting left-invariant complex or symplectic structures, https://arxiv.org/abs/2406. 06819, 2024. (cited on p. 3, 23, 24, 25, 26)

    work page 2024

  2. [14]

    D.Conti, F.A.Rossi, andR.SegnanDalmasso, Pseudo-Kähler and pseudo-Sasaki structures on Einstein solvmanifolds, Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom.63 (2023), no. 3, 25 (26 pp),10.1007/s10455-023-09894-0. (cited on p. 2, 3, 11, 27, 28) References 32

    work page doi:10.1007/s10455-023-09894-0 2023

  3. [1]

    D. V. Alekseevsky and V. Cortés, Classification of stationary compact homogeneous special pseudo- Kähler manifolds of semisimple groups , Proc. London Math. Soc. 81 (2000), no. 1, 211–230, 10.1112/S0024611500012363. (cited on p. 2)

    work page doi:10.1112/s0024611500012363 2000

  4. [2]

    Andrada, Hypersymplectic Lie algebras , J

    A. Andrada, Hypersymplectic Lie algebras , J. Geom. Phys. 56 (2006), no. 10, 2039–2067, 10.1016/j.geomphys.2005.11.006. (cited on p. 2)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2005.11.006 2006

  5. [3]

    Andrada, R

    A. Andrada, R. M. Arroyo, M. L. Barberis, S. Rollenske, and K. Wehler, Almost abelian complex nilmanifolds, https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.03306, 2025. (cited on p. 3, 11)

    arXiv 2025

  6. [4]

    Andrada and I

    A. Andrada and I. G. Dotti,Double products and hypersymplectic structures onR4n, Commun. Math. Phys. 262 (2006), no. 1, 1–16,10.1007/s00220-005-1472-9. (cited on p. 2)

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-005-1472-9 2006

  7. [6]

    Avetisyan,The structure of almost Abelian Lie algebras, Int

    Z. Avetisyan,The structure of almost Abelian Lie algebras, Int. J. Math.33 (2022), no. 8, 2250057, 10.1142/S0129167X22500574. (cited on p. 28)

    work page doi:10.1142/s0129167x22500574 2022

  8. [7]

    Bajo and E

    I. Bajo and E. Sanmartín, Pseudo-Kähler Lie algebras with abelian complex structures, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.45 (2012), 465205 (21 pp),10.1088/1751-8113/45/46/465205. (cited on p. 2, 11)

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/45/46/465205 2012

Show all 46 references
  1. [8]

    Bazzoni, M

    G. Bazzoni, M. Freibert, A. Latorre, and N. Tardini,Complex symplectic Lie algebras with large Abelian subalgebras, Linear Algebra Appl.677 (2023), 254–305, 10.1016/j.laa.2023.08.006. (cited on p. 3)

    2023 doi

  2. [9]

    Bazzoni, A

    G. Bazzoni, A. Gil-García, and A. Latorre,Symmetric and skew-symmetric complex structures, J. Geom. Phys. 170 (2021), 104348 (14 pp),10.1016/j.geomphys.2021.104348. (cited on p. 2)

    2021

  3. [10]

    A. V. Bolsinov and S. Rosemann,Local description of Bochner-flat (pseudo-)Kähler metrics, Commun. Anal. Geom.29 (2021), no. 3, 525–577,10.4310/CAG.2021.v29.n3.a1. (cited on p. 2)

    2021 doi

  4. [11]

    Burgoyne and R

    N. Burgoyne and R. Cushman,Conjugacy classes in linear groups, J. Algebra44 (1977), no. 2, 339–362, 10.1016/0021-8693(77)90186-7. (cited on p. 3, 11, 12, 23)

    1977 doi

  5. [12]

    Böhm and R

    C. Böhm and R. A. Lafuente,Non-compact Einstein manifolds with symmetry, J. Amer. Math. Soc.36 (2023), no. 3, 591–651,10.1090/jams/1022. (cited on p. 2)

    2023 doi

  6. [13]

    Conti and A

    D. Conti and A. Gil-García,Pseudo-Kähler and hypersymplectic structures on semidirect products, Dif- ferential Geom. Appl. 98 (2025), 102220 (34 pp), 10.1016/j.difgeo.2024.102220. (cited on p. 2, 11)

    2025

  7. [15]

    L. A. Cordero, M. Fernández, and L. Ugarte,Pseudo-Kähler metrics on six-dimensional nilpotent Lie algebras, J. Geom. Phys.50 (2004), no. 1-4, 115–137, 10.1016/j.geomphys.2003.12.003. (cited on p. 2, 7, 11)

    2004 doi

  8. [16]

    Dardié and A

    J.-M. Dardié and A. Médina,Algèbres de Lie kählériennes et double extension, J. Algebra185 (1996), no. 3, 774–795,10.1006/jabr.1996.0350. (cited on p. 2)

    1996

  9. [17]

    Derdzinski and I

    A. Derdzinski and I. Terek, Killing fields on compact pseudo-Kähler manifolds, J. Geom. Anal. 34 (2024), no. 5, 144 (7 pp),10.1007/s12220-024-01591-z. (cited on p. 2)

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    Dorfmeister and Z.-D

    J. Dorfmeister and Z.-D. Guan,Classification of compact homogeneous pseudo-Kähler manifolds, Com- ment. Math. Helv.67 (1992), no. 1, 499–513,10.1007/BF02566516. (cited on p. 2)

    1992 doi

  11. [19]

    Dorfmeister and K

    J. Dorfmeister and K. Nakajima,The fundamental conjecture for homogeneous Kähler manifolds, Acta Math. 161 (1988), no. 1, 23–70,10.1007/BF02392294. (cited on p. 2)

    1988 doi

  12. [20]

    Fino and F

    A. Fino and F. Paradiso,Generalized Kähler almost abelian Lie groups, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl.200 (2021), no. 4, 1781–1812,10.1007/s10231-020-01059-1. (cited on p. 3, 5)

    2021 doi

  13. [21]

    Pure Appl

    , Balanced Hermitian structures on almost abelian Lie algebras, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 227 (2023), no. 2, 107186 (25 pp),10.1016/j.jpaa.2022.107186. (cited on p. 3)

    2023

  14. [22]

    A. Fino, M. Parton, and S. Salamon,Families of strong KT structures in six dimensions, Comment. Math. Helv.79 (2004), no. 2, 317–340,10.1007/s00014-004-0803-3. (cited on p. 11)

    2004 doi

  15. [23]

    Freibert,Cocalibrated structures on Lie algebras with a codimension one Abelian ideal, Ann

    M. Freibert,Cocalibrated structures on Lie algebras with a codimension one Abelian ideal, Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom.42 (2012), no. 4, 537–563,10.1007/s10455-012-9326-0. (cited on p. 15)

    2012 doi

  16. [24]

    11316, 2024

    , Torsion-freeH-structures on almost Abelian solvmanifolds, https://arxiv.org/abs/2412. 11316, 2024. (cited on p. 3)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Gil-García and P

    A. Gil-García and P. N. Pilatus, Born Lie algebras, J. Geom. Phys. 214 (2025), 105518 (16 pp), 10.1016/j.geomphys.2025.105518. (cited on p. 2)

    2025

  18. [26]

    Guan, Classification of compact complex homogeneous manifolds with pseudo-kählerian structures, J

    D. Guan, Classification of compact complex homogeneous manifolds with pseudo-kählerian structures, J. Algebra324 (2010), no. 8, 2010–2024,10.1016/j.jalgebra.2010.06.013. (cited on p. 2)

    2010 doi

  19. [27]

    M. J. D. Hamilton, D. Kotschick, and P. N. Pilatus,Born geometry via Künneth structures and recursion operators, Commun. Math. Phys.406 (2025), no. 6, 123 (25 pp),10.1007/s00220-025-05296-4. (cited on p. 2)

    2025 doi

  20. [28]

    Hasegawa, Minimal models of nilmanifolds, Proc

    K. Hasegawa, Minimal models of nilmanifolds, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 106 (1989), no. 1, 65–71, 10.1090/S0002-9939-1989-0946638-X. (cited on p. 2)

    1989 doi

  21. [29]

    Heber, Noncompact homogeneous Einstein spaces, Invent

    J. Heber, Noncompact homogeneous Einstein spaces, Invent. Math. 133 (1998), no. 2, 279–352, 10.1007/s002220050247. (cited on p. 2)

    1998 doi

  22. [30]

    Latorre and L

    A. Latorre and L. Ugarte,On the stability of compact pseudo-Kähler and neutral Calabi-Yau manifolds, J. Math. Pures Appl.145 (2021), 240–262, 10.1016/j.matpur.2020.09.001. (cited on p. 2)

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    Real Acad

    , Nilmanifolds with non-nilpotent complex structures and their pseudo-Kähler geometry , Rev. Real Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fis. Nat. Ser. A-Mat. 119 (2025), no. 2, 47 (29 pp), 10.1007/s13398-025-01712-5. (cited on p. 2, 7)

    2025 doi

  24. [32]

    Lauret, Einstein solvmanifolds are standard , Ann

    J. Lauret, Einstein solvmanifolds are standard , Ann. Math. 172 (2010), no. 3, 1859–1877, 10.4007/annals.2010.172.1859. (cited on p. 2)

    2010 doi

  25. [33]

    Lauret and E

    J. Lauret and E. A. Rodríguez Valencia,On the Chern-Ricci flow and its solitons for Lie groups, Math. Nachr. 288 (2015), no. 13, 1512–1526,10.1002/mana.201300333. (cited on p. 5)

    2015 doi

  26. [34]

    Lichnerowicz, Groupes de Lie à structures symplectiques ou Kähleriennes invariantes, Geometrie symplectique et mecanique, Lecture notes in mathematics, vol

    A. Lichnerowicz, Groupes de Lie à structures symplectiques ou Kähleriennes invariantes, Geometrie symplectique et mecanique, Lecture notes in mathematics, vol. 1416, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1988, 10.1007/BFb0097472, pp. 192–209. (cited on p. 2)

    1988 doi

  27. [35]

    Mantegazza,Construction of projective special Kähler manifolds, Ann

    M. Mantegazza,Construction of projective special Kähler manifolds, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl.200 (2021), no. 6, 2645–2687,10.1007/s10231-021-01096-4. (cited on p. 2)

    2021 doi

  28. [36]

    Matsushima, Remarks on Kähler-Einstein manifolds , Nagoya Math

    Y. Matsushima, Remarks on Kähler-Einstein manifolds , Nagoya Math. J. 46 (1972), 161–173, 10.1017/S0027763000014847. (cited on p. 2) References 33

    1972 doi

  29. [37]

    C. Mehl, V. Mehrmann, A. C. M. Ran, and L. Rodman,Eigenvalue perturbation theory of structured real matrices and their sign characteristics under generic structured rank-one perturbations, Linear Multilinear Algebra64 (2016), no. 3, 527–556,10.1080/03081087.2015.1053425. (cite...

    2016

  30. [38]

    Milnor, Curvatures of left invariant metrics on Lie groups, Adv

    J. Milnor, Curvatures of left invariant metrics on Lie groups, Adv. Math.21 (1976), no. 3, 293–329, 10.1016/S0001-8708(76)80002-3. (cited on p. 2)

    1976 doi

  31. [39]

    G. P. Ovando,Invariant pseudo-Kähler metrics in dimension four, J. Lie Theory 16 (2006), no. 2, 371–391, https://www.heldermann.de/JLT/JLT16/JLT162/jlt16023.htm. (cited on p. 2, 6)

    2006

  32. [40]

    Paradiso,Locally conformally balanced metrics on almost abelian Lie algebras, Complex Manifolds8 (2021), no

    F. Paradiso,Locally conformally balanced metrics on almost abelian Lie algebras, Complex Manifolds8 (2021), no. 1, 196–207,10.1515/coma-2020-0111. (cited on p. 3)

    2021 doi

  33. [41]

    Petean,Indefinite Kähler-Einstein metrics on compact complex surfaces, Commun

    J. Petean,Indefinite Kähler-Einstein metrics on compact complex surfaces, Commun. Math. Phys.189 (1997), no. 1, 227–235,10.1007/s002200050197. (cited on p. 2)

    1997 doi

  34. [42]

    F. A. Rossi,New special Einstein pseudo-Riemannian metrics on solvable Lie algebras, Riv. Mat. Univ. Parma 13 (2022), no. 2, 449–479,https://www.rivmat.unipr.it/vols/2022-13-2/08-rossi.html. (cited on p. 2)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Segal, The structure of complete left-symmetric algebras, Math

    D. Segal, The structure of complete left-symmetric algebras, Math. Ann.293 (1992), no. 1, 569–578, 10.1007/BF01444735. (cited on p. 11)

    1992 doi

  36. [44]

    Valencia, Left invariant special Kähler structures , Indag

    F. Valencia, Left invariant special Kähler structures , Indag. Math. 33 (2022), no. 3, 598–624, 10.1016/j.indag.2021.12.005. (cited on p. 2)

    2022 doi

  37. [45]

    Yamada,Ricci flatness of certain compact pseudo-Kähler solvmanifolds, J

    T. Yamada,Ricci flatness of certain compact pseudo-Kähler solvmanifolds, J. Geom. Phys.62 (2012), no. 5, 1338–1345,10.1016/j.geomphys.2011.06.006. (cited on p. 2, 11)

    2012 doi

  38. [46]

    , Holomorphic vector fields and Hodge numbers of compact pseudo-Kähler nilmanifolds, J. Geom. Phys. 144 (2019), 263–272, 10.1016/j.geomphys.2019.06.008. (cited on p. 2)

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.