Inequality's Economic and Social Roots: the Role of Social Networks and Homophily

Matthew O. Jackson

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 269 references

Inequality's Economic and Social Roots: the Role of Social Networks and Homophily

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This essay argues that homophily in social networks is a primary driver of inequality and economic immobility, and that policies ignoring social structure will fail.

desk verdict A clear, broad invited survey on networks, homophily, and inequality; worth reading for synthesis, but the causal framing of economic-connectedness evidence runs ahead of what the observational data show. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.13016 v1 pith:OCAQDPJC submitted 2025-06-16 econ.GN q-fin.EC

Matthew O. Jackson This is my paper

classification econ.GNq-fin.EC

keywords inequalityeconomicmobilitysocialnetworkshomophilyjobreferralscapitalpovertytrapspolicydesign

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This essay argues that economic inequality and immobility cannot be adequately explained by financial and human capital alone: the structure of social networks, and the homophily that divides them, is a first-order driver of persistent differences across communities. The paper claims that because people depend on their friends and family for information, job opportunities, and behavioral norms, network divisions keep those resources concentrated inside groups and reproduce disadvantage across generations. It marshals evidence that cross-income connections within a community predict upward mobility more strongly than standard measures of poverty, segregation, social capital, or human capital. A sympathetic reader would care because the conclusion is that redistribution and subsidies alone will leave long-run inequality largely intact, and effective policy must also open up networks.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is homophily acting through three networked channels: uneven job referrals and opportunities, uneven access to valuable information, and divergent peer-driven norms. The formal backbone is a set of network models — referral-based labor market models in which employment and wages correlate across connected people and generations, and social learning models in which homophily slows or blocks consensus — together with the social multiplier idea that targeted interventions can cascade through a network.

What would settle it

A large randomized or quasi-experimental intervention that creates strong cross-income ties — for example long-term mentorship or school desegregation with small mixed groups — would falsify the central claim if it produced no improvement in earnings mobility relative to controls. A sibling-fixed-effects reanalysis of the observational connectedness data that eliminated the mobility association would also undercut the causal interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery asserted here is that social-network structure plays a starring, distinct role in predicting inequality and mobility, separate from financial capital and family background. On the paper's terms, homophily — the tendency to form ties with similar others — entraps opportunities, information, and norms within groups; this shows up empirically as a tight link between a community's cross-income connectedness and its children's upward mobility. The paper further claims that this connectedness measure subsumes the Great Gatsby Curve: once a community's cross-income connections are accounted for, the usual correlation between inequality and immobility disappears.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the measured correlation between community connectedness and mobility reflects network causation, not unobserved neighborhood characteristics driving both.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Redistribution and subsidies alleviate symptoms but do not remove the social-structural causes of inequality, so they should be paired with network-opening policies.
Raising a community's cross-income connectedness should raise upward mobility, since the data show a roughly linear relationship between the two.
Targeting scholarships or jobs to cliques in a network, rather than scattering them, can produce cascading adoption of education and employment behaviors.
Structuring large organizations and schools into small, well-mixed sub-communities is a concrete, relatively novel policy lever for reducing homophily.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the paper's causal reading holds, economic connectedness should become a routine diagnostic for local policy planning, much like poverty rates or unemployment statistics.
The argument implies that algorithmic feeds and friend suggestions that increase homophily may be actively entrenching intergenerational immobility, a testable claim with platform data.
The small-community design principle could be tested directly by randomizing the internal composition of student cohorts in large universities and tracking long-term earnings.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a survey essay, not a new research paper. If you are looking for a new model, new data, or a falsifiable prediction, you will not find it here. What you will find is a clear, wide-ranging overview of how social networks and homophily contribute to inequality and immobility, written by someone who helped create the literature. It is worth reading for the synthesis and for the policy discussion.

The only genuinely new element is a policy suggestion: instead of trying to desegregate large institutions wholesale, structure them as small, well-mixed subcommunities to encourage cross-group interaction. That idea is plausible and grounded in the Carrell-Sacerdote-West finding that small groups integrate better than large ones, but it is not formalized or tested, and the author does not claim otherwise.

The main soft spot is the way causal language creeps into the discussion of Chetty et al. (2022a). The paper correctly calls the Great Gatsby Curve correlation observational, but in Section 4.2 it describes the economic-connectedness results as "strong empirical evidence" that cross-income friendships drive mobility, and in Section 5.2.2 it states that moving from the 10th to 90th percentile of economic connectedness predicts a 10-percentile increase in child income rank and that cross-income connections "hold promise as a key to improving economic mobility." That evidence comes from observational Facebook data aggregated at the ZIP-code level, with no experimental variation. The essay does acknowledge the observational nature in places and points to MTO and peer-effect experiments as supporting causal mechanisms, but those studies do not identify the effect of economic connectedness per se. The framing is more balanced than the headlines suggest, but it leans causal, and that is worth flagging if you use it in a policy context.

The essay leans heavily on the author's own coauthored work. That is natural for a survey by a leading figure, and the cited work is published and independently scrutinized, so this is not a flaw per se, but it does mean the essay is not an independent assessment.

Who is this for? People who want a single authoritative overview of the network perspective on inequality, not researchers looking for new results. It deserves a serious referee in the sense that any widely read invited survey should be checked for balance and accuracy. If it came in as an unsolicited research paper, I would desk reject for lack of new findings; as an invited piece for the World Congress, I would accept with light-touch review and a request to soften the causal language in Sections 4.2 and 5.2.2.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This invited essay argues that inequality and economic immobility are driven not only by standard economic forces (returns to capital, human-capital poverty traps, discrimination) but crucially by social-network structure, particularly homophily, which channels information, opportunities, and norms unequally across groups. It reviews theory and evidence on referral-based job networks, social learning, and peer effects; reports that community-level cross-income connectedness strongly predicts upward mobility; and derives policy implications, including network-aware 'policy cocktails.' The paper is a synthesis essay rather than a new contribution, drawing extensively on the author's own coauthored empirical and theoretical work.

Significance. The essay's value lies in its accessible synthesis of a broad literature and its clear articulation of a network-based policy agenda. It is honest in places about the observational nature of key evidence (e.g., the Great Gatsby Curve in §2.2), and it draws on large-scale empirical studies and formal models. If the causal interpretation of economic connectedness were established, the policy implications would be substantial. However, the essay's central claim currently rests on a causal leap from predictive associations, which limits its evidentiary force as written. The paper is nevertheless a useful contribution for a World Congress volume, provided the evidentiary claims are aligned with the underlying study designs.

major comments (3)

[§4.2 and §5.2.2] The essay moves from predictive association to causal driver without addressing identification. Chetty et al. (2022a) is an observational study of Facebook friendships aggregated to ZIP codes; the essay does not discuss selection, reverse causality, or unobserved place characteristics. The statements that cross-income connections 'out-predict' other community measures and that moving from the 10th to 90th percentile of economic connectedness 'predicts a 10 percentile increase in income rank' are correlational, yet the abstract and §5.2.2 conclude that network divisions 'cause' inequality and that cross-income connections 'hold promise as a key to improving economic mobility.' This is load-bearing for the policy recommendations. The essay should either add an explicit identification discussion, or temper the causal language to 'predictive' and 'consistent with causal effects.'
[§5.2.2] The causal evidence cited to support network effects does not directly identify the effect of cross-income economic connectedness. The Moving to Opportunity results change neighborhoods broadly; Carrell, Sacerdote, and West (2013) study academic peer composition and actually find that engineered exposure backfired due to endogenous sorting; and the randomized peer-effect studies (e.g., Sacerdote 2001; Banerjee et al. 2021) concern other domains. None of these isolates economic connectedness as the active channel. The extrapolation from these studies to the connectedness–mobility link needs to be justified or explicitly flagged as an assumption.
[§2.2] The Great Gatsby Curve is correctly labeled observational, but the following sentence ('growing evidence shows that there are causal aspects to it') is not backed by a specific citation in that section; the later reference to §5.2.2 does not supply direct causal evidence for the curve itself. Either provide concrete causal evidence or soften the assertion.

minor comments (6)

[§2.2] 'Freidrich Engels' should be 'Friedrich Engels.'
[§5.2.1] 'ow whether to continue' should be 'of whether to continue.'
[§5.2.3 (final paragraph)] 'the which information people see' is ungrammatical; it should be 'the information that people see.'
[References] In the Chetty et al. (2022a) entry, 'Johannes Stroebl' appears to be a typo for 'Johannes Stroebel.'
[Figure 1] The text refers to Figure 1, but no figure appears in the arXiv manuscript; if this is a preprint formatting issue, please include the figure.
[§4.2] 'This is born out in strong empirical evidence' should be 'This is borne out in strong empirical evidence.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the essay is a survey whose network-inequality claims rest on independent external empirics, not on inputs redefined as outputs.

full rationale

I walked the claimed derivation chain and found no step where a prediction or first-principles result reduces to its own inputs. The central empirical claims come from Chetty et al. (2022a), where economic connectedness is measured from Facebook data and mobility from tax records; the predictor and outcome are distinct constructs, so calling the regression relationship a 'prediction' is standard shorthand rather than a fitted-input tautology. The claim that cross-income connections 'out-predicts other standard community measures' is an in-sample comparison of explanatory power, but it is not circular because the outcome is not defined in terms of the predictor. The Great Gatsby Curve mediation result (controlling for cross-income connections makes the inequality-immobility relationship disappear) is an empirical mediation claim, not a construction. The theory pieces (Calvo-Armengol and Jackson 2004, 2007, 2009; Bolte, Immorlica, and Jackson 2025) start from explicit assumptions about referrals and homophily and derive implications; the assumptions do not already contain the inequality and immobility conclusions. Heavy reliance on the author's own coauthored work is present and is appropriately noted, but under the review rules these are independent support: Chetty et al. (2022a, 2022b) are large-scale, externally falsifiable empirical studies, and the theoretical papers have stated assumptions that do not include the target result. The paper's causal framing of observational associations is a research-design concern, not a circularity concern. Hence a low score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The essay imports its evidence from cited empirical studies; it introduces no new free parameters or invented entities. It does rely on causal interpretations of observational correlations as background assumptions, which are listed above.

assumptions (2)

domain assumption The prevalence and causal impact of referral-based hiring and homophilous network formation are sufficient to make network divides a primary driver of inequality.
Invoked throughout Sections 4.1-4.3 and assumed when drawing policy conclusions; supported by cited studies but not quantified or causally identified in this essay.
domain assumption Associations between community-level economic connectedness and mobility reflect causal network effects rather than selection on unobserved place characteristics.
Underpins the policy claims in Sections 5.2.1-5.2.3; based on observational Facebook data in Chetty et al. (2022a) with no experimental variation in connectedness.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Inequality's Economic and Social Roots: the Role of Social Networks and Homophily." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OCAQDPJC

@misc{pith2026250613016,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Inequality's Economic and Social Roots: the Role of Social Networks and Homophily},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OCAQDPJC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.13016}
}

read the original abstract

I discuss economic and social sources of inequality and elaborate on the role of social networks in inequality, economic immobility, and economic inefficiencies. The lens of social networks clarifies how the entanglement of people's information, opportunities, and behaviors with those of their friends and family leads to persistent differences across communities, resulting in inequality in education, employment, income, health, and wealth. The key role of homophily in separating groups within the network is highlighted. A network perspective's policy implications differ substantially from a narrower economic perspective that ignores social structure. I discuss the importance of ``policy cocktails'' that include aspects that are aimed at both the economic and social forces driving inequality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.13016 by the authors.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

269 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

[1]

Abramitzky, Ran. 2011. Lessons from the Kibbutz on the Equality--Incentives Trade-off. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 25 (1):185--207

2011
[2]

--- --- ---. 2018. The Mystery of the Kibbutz: Egalitarian Principles in a Capitalist World. Princeton University Press

2018
[3]

Abramitzky, Ran, Leah Platt Boustan, Elisa J \'a come, and Santiago P \'e rez. 2019. Intergenerational Mobility of Immigrants in the US over Two Centuries. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research

2019
[4]

Acemoglu, Daron and Matthew O. Jackson. 2014. History, expectations, and leadership in the evolution of social norms. The Review of Economic Studies 82 (2):423--456

2014
[5]

Robinson

Acemoglu, Daron and James A. Robinson. 2015. The rise and decline of general laws of capitalism. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (1):3--28

2015
[6]

Adermon, Adrian, Mikael Lindahl, and M rten Palme. 2021. Dynastic Human Capital, Inequality and Intergenerational Mobility. American Economic Review 111(5):1523--1548

2021
[7]

and Katherine Newman

Adler, Nancy E. and Katherine Newman. 2002. Socioeconomic disparities in health: pathways and policies. Health affairs 21 (2):60--76

2002
[8]

Agostinelli, Francesco, Matthias Doepke, Giuseppe Sorrenti, and Fabrizio Zilibotti. 2020. It takes a village: the economics of parenting with neighborhood and peer effects. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research

2020

Show all 269 references

[9]

Aiyar, Shekhar and Christian Ebeke. 2020. Inequality of opportunity, inequality of income and economic growth. World Development 136:105115

2020
[10]

Aizer, Anna and Flavio Cunha. 2012. The production of human capital: Endowments, investments and fertility. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research

2012
[11]

Alesina, Alberto and Eliana La Ferrara. 2000. Participation in heterogeneous communities. The quarterly journal of economics 115 (3):847--904

2000
[12]

Alfani, Guido. 2021. Economic inequality in preindustrial times: Europe and beyond. Journal of Economic Literature

2021
[13]

Allport, Gordon W. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday

1954
[14]

Almond, Douglas, Janet Currie, and Valentina Duque. 2018. Childhood circumstances and adult outcomes: Act II. Journal of Economic Literature 56 (4):1360--1446

2018
[15]

Alvaredo, Facundo, Lucas Chancel, Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez, and Gabriel Zucman. 2018. World inequality report 2018. Belknap Press

2018
[16]

Ambrus, Attila, Markus Mobius, and Adam Szeidl. 2014. Consumption risk-sharing in social networks. American Economic Review 104 (1):149--82

2014
[17]

Andrews, Dan and Andrew Leigh. 2009. More inequality, less social mobility. Applied economics letters 16 (15):1489--1492

2009
[18]

Aral, Sinan and Christos Nicolaides. 2017. Exercise contagion in a global social network. Nature communications 8:14753

2017
[19]

Arrow, Kenneth J. 1971. Some models of racial discrimination in the labor market. Tech. rep., Rand Corp. Santa Monica CA

1971
[20]

--- --- ---. 1998. What has economics to say about racial discrimination? Journal of economic perspectives 12 (2):91--100

1998
[21]

and Ron Borzekowski

Arrow, Kenneth J. and Ron Borzekowski. 2004. Limited network connections and the distribution of wages. FEDS Working Paper

2004
[22]

Atkeson, Andrew and Magnus Irie. 2020. Understanding 100 Years of the Evolution of Top Wealth Shares in the US: What is the Role of Family Firms? National Bureau of Economic Research, working paper

2020
[23]

Atkinson, Anthony B. 1975. The economics of inequality. Oxford: Claredon Press

1975
[24]

Atkinson, Anthony B. 2015. Inequality: What can be done? Harvard University Press

2015
[25]

Atkinson, Anthony B and Salvatore Morelli. 2014. Chartbook of economic inequality. ECINEQ WP 324

2014
[26]

Atkinson, Anthony B, Thomas Piketty, and Emmanuel Saez. 2011. Top incomes in the long run of history. Journal of economic literature 49 (1):3--71

2011
[27]

G \'o rski, Matthew O

Atkisson, Curtis, Piotr J. G \'o rski, Matthew O. Jackson, Janusz A. Ho yst, and Raissa M. D'Souza. 2020. Why understanding multiplex social network structuring processes will help us better understand the evolution of human behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology 29:102

2020
[28]

Acting White

Austen-Smith, David and Roland G. Fryer, Jr. 2005. An Economic Analysis of "Acting White". The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (2):551--583

2005
[29]

Autor, David, Claudia Goldin, and Lawrence F. Katz. 2020. The race between education and technology revisited. In AEA Papers and Proceedings, vol. 110. 347--51

2020
[30]

Avin, Chen, Barbara Keller, Zvi Lotker, Claire Mathieu, David Peleg, and Yvonne-Anne Pignolet. 2015. Homophily and the glass ceiling effect in social networks. In Proceedings of the 2015 conference on innovations in theoretical computer science. 41--50

2015
[31]

Aybas, Yunus can and Matthew O. Jackson. 2021. Social Learning and the Countervailing Forces of Homophily. mimeo Stanford

2021
[32]

Bailey, Martha J, Brenden D Timpe, and Shuqiao Sun. 2020. Prep School for poor kids: The long-run impacts of Head Start on Human capital and economic self-sufficiency. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research

2020
[33]

Bailey, Michael, Rachel Cao, Theresa Kuchler, Johannes Stroebel, and Arlene Wong. 2018. Social connectedness: Measurement, determinants, and effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives 32 (3):259--80

2018
[34]

Bakshy, Eytan, Solomon Messing, and Lada A Adamic. 2015. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348 (6239):1130--1132

2015
[35]

Bandiera, O. and I. Rasul. 2006. Social Networks and Technology Adoption in Northern Mozambique* . The Economic Journal 116 (514):869--902

2006
[36]

Chandrasekhar, Esther Duflo, John Floretta, Matthew O

Banerjee, Abhijit, Arun G. Chandrasekhar, Esther Duflo, John Floretta, Matthew O. Jackson, Harini Kannan, Francine Loza, Anirudh Sankar, and Anna Schrimpf. 2021. Selecting the Most Effective Nudge: Evidence from a Large Scale Experiment on Immunization. mimeo: MIT and Stanford

2021
[37]

Chandrasekhar, Esther Duflo, and Matthew O

Banerjee, Abhijit, Arun G. Chandrasekhar, Esther Duflo, and Matthew O. Jackson. 2019. Using gossips to spread information: Theory and evidence from two randomized controlled trials. The Review of Economic Studies 86 (6):2453--2490

2019
[38]

Chandrasekhar, Esther Duflo, Matthew O

Banerjee, Abhijit V., Emily Breza, Arun G. Chandrasekhar, Esther Duflo, Matthew O. Jackson, and Cynthia Kinnan. 2020. Changes in Social Network Structure in Response to Exposure to Formal Credit Markets. SSRN paper 3245656

2020
[39]

Chandrasekhar, Esther Duflo, and Matthew O

Banerjee, Abhijit V., Arun G. Chandrasekhar, Esther Duflo, and Matthew O. Jackson. 2013. Diffusion of Microfinance. Science 341 (6144):DOI: 10.1126/science.1236498, July 26 2013

2013 doi
[40]

and Esther Duflo

Banerjee, Abhijit V. and Esther Duflo. 2011. Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. Public Affairs

2011
[41]

Barber \`a , Salvador and Matthew Jackson. 1988. Maximin, leximin, and the protective criterion: characterizations and comparisons. Journal of Economic Theory 46 (1):34--44

1988
[42]

Barnhardt, Sharon, Erica Field, and Rohini Pande. 2016. Moving to Opportunity or Isolation? Network Effects of a Randomized Housing Lottery in Urban India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 9(1):1--32

2016
[43]

Barro, Robert J. 2000. Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries. Journal of economic growth 5 (1):5--32

2000
[44]

Barron, Daniel, Yingni Guo, and Bryony Reich. 2020. Too Big for their Boots. mimeo

2020
[45]

Beaman, Lori, Esther Duflo, Rohini Pande, and Petia Topalova. 2012. Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: A policy experiment in India. science 335 (6068):582--586

2012
[46]

Beaman, Lori, Niall Keleher, and Jeremy Magruder. 2018. Do job networks disadvantage women? Evidence from a recruitment experiment in Malawi. Journal of Labor Economics 36 (1):121--157

2018
[47]

Beaman, Lori A. 2012. Social Networks and the Dynamics of Labour Market Outcomes: Evidence from Refugees Resettled in the U.S. Review of Economic Studies 79 (1):128--161

2012
[48]

Becker, Gary S. 1957. The economics of discrimination. University of Chicago press

1957
[49]

--- --- ---. 2009. A Treatise on the Family. Harvard university press

2009
[50]

Benabou, Roland. 1993. Workings of a city: location, education, and production. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (3):619--652

1993
[51]

--- --- ---. 1996 a . Equity and efficiency in human capital investment: the local connection. The Review of Economic Studies 63 (2):237--264

1996
[52]

--- --- ---. 1996 b . Inequality and growth. NBER macroeconomics annual 11:11--74

1996
[53]

Benhabib, Jess and Alberto Bisin. 2018. Skewed wealth distributions: Theory and empirics. Journal of Economic Literature 56 (4):1261--91

2018
[54]

Benhabib, Jess, Alberto Bisin, and Shenghao Zhu. 2011. The distribution of wealth and fiscal policy in economies with finitely lived agents. Econometrica 79 (1):123--157

2011
[55]

Benson, Alan, Simon Board, and Moritz Meyer-ter Vehn. 2019. Discrimination in hiring: Evidence from retail sales. preprint: UCLA

2019
[56]

Bentham, Jeremy. 1789. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation
[57]

Berardi, Nicoletta, Marie Lalanne, and Paul Seabright. 2019. Professional Networks and their Coevolution with Executive Careers. Banque de France Working Paper July 2019, WP

2019
[58]

Berg, Andrew, Jonathan D Ostry, Charalambos G Tsangarides, and Yorbol Yakhshilikov. 2018. Redistribution, inequality, and growth: new evidence. Journal of Economic Growth 23 (3):259--305

2018
[59]

Bertrand, Marianne and Esther Duflo. 2017. Field experiments on discrimination. Handbook of economic field experiments 1:309--393

2017
[60]

Bewley, Truman F. 1999. Why wages don't fall during a recession. Harvard university press

1999
[61]

Blau, Peter M. 1977. A macrosociological theory of social structure. American journal of sociology 83 (1):26--54

1977
[62]

Blau, Peter M. 1987. Contrasting theoretical perspectives. Chapter 2 in The micro-macro link, University of California Publishers :71--85

1987
[63]

and Joseph E Schwartz

Blau, Peter M. and Joseph E Schwartz. 1984. Crosscutting social circles: Testing a macrostructural theory of intergroup relations. Academic Press 1984

1984
[64]

Bohren, J Aislinn, Kareem Haggag, Alex Imas, and Devin G Pope. 2019. Inaccurate statistical discrimination. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research

2019
[65]

Bolte, Lukas, Nicole Immorlica, and Matthew O. Jackson. 2025. The Role of Referrals in Inequality, Immobility, and Inefficiency in Labor Markets. forthcoming in the Journal of Labor Economics

2025
[66]

Bond, Brittany M and Roberto M Fernandez. 2019. Networks for the unemployed? Social Networks at Work

2019
[67]

Borgerhoff-Mulder, Monique, Samuel Bowles, Tom Hertz, Adrian Bell, Jan Beise, Greg Clark, Ila Fazzio, Michael Gurven, Kim Hill, Paul L Hooper et al. 2009. Intergenerational wealth transmission and the dynamics of inequality in small-scale societies. science 326 (5953):682--688

2009
[68]

Borisov, Gleb V and Christopher A Pissarides. 2016. The intergenerational transmission of human capital and earnings in contemporary Russia. Tech. rep., IZA Discussion Papers

2016
[69]

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. The forms of capital. Handbook of Theory and Research of for the Sociology of Education

1986
[70]

Bourguignon, Fran c ois and Christian Morrisson. 2002 a . Inequality among world citizens: 1820 - 1992. American economic review 92 (4):727--744

2002
[71]

--- --- ---. 2002 b . Inequality Among World Citizens: 18201992. The American Economic Review 92 (4):727--744

2002
[72]

Bowles, Samuel. 1972. Schooling and inequality from generation to generation. Journal of Political Economy 80 (3, Part 2):S219--S251

1972
[73]

Bowles, Samuel and Herbert Gintis. 2002. The inheritance of inequality. Journal of economic Perspectives 16 (3):3--30

2002
[74]

Bowles, Samuel, Glenn C Loury, and Rajiv Sethi. 2014. Group inequality. Journal of the European Economic Association 12 (1):129--152

2014
[75]

Bowles, Samuel, Eric Alden Smith, and Monique Borgerhoff Mulder. 2010. The emergence and persistence of inequality in premodern societies: introduction to the special section. Current Anthropology 51 (1):7--17

2010
[76]

Bowles, Samuel, Eric Alden Smith, and Monique Borgerhoff-Mulder Editors. 2010. Intergenerational Wealth Transmission and Inequality in Premodern Societies. Special Issue of Current Anthropology 51:1

2010
[77]

Bramoull \'e , Yann and Sanjeev Goyal. 2016. Favoritism. Journal of Development Economics 122:16--27

2016
[78]

Brown, Meta, Elizabeth Setren, and Giorgio Topa. 2012. Do informal referrals lead to better matches? Evidence from a firm's employee referral system. Evidence from a Firm's Employee Referral System (August 1, 2012). FRB of New York Staff Report (568)

2012
[79]

Buhai, I Sebastian and Marco J van der Leij. 2023. A social network analysis of occupational segregation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 147:104593

2023
[80]

Buhai, Ioan Sebastian and Marco J van der Leij. 2020. A social network analysis of occupational segregation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.09293

2020 arXiv
[81]

Burks, Stephen V, Bo Cowgill, Mitchell Hoffman, and Michael Housman. 2015. The value of hiring through employee referrals. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 130 (2):805--839

2015
[82]

Bursztyn, Leonardo, Thomas Chaney, Tarek Alexander Hassan, and Aakaash Rao. 2021. The Immigrant Next Door: Exposure, Prejudice, and Altruism. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research

2021
[83]

Bursztyn, Leonardo, Alessandra L Gonz \'a lez, and David Yanagizawa-Drott. 2020. Misperceived social norms: Women working outside the home in saudi arabia. American economic review 110 (10):2997--3029

2020
[84]

Calv \'o -Armengol, Antoni. 2004. Job contact networks. Journal of economic Theory 115 (1):191--206

2004
[85]

Calvo-Armengol, Antoni and Matthew O. Jackson. 2004. The effects of social networks on employment and inequality . The American Economic Review 94 (3):426--454

2004
[86]

--- --- ---. 2007. Networks in labor markets: Wage and employment dynamics and inequality . Journal of Economic Theory 132 (1):27--46

2007
[87]

--- --- ---. 2009. Like Father, Like Son: Labor Market Networks and Social Mobility. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 1 (1):124–150

2009
[88]

Calv \'o -Armengol, Antoni and Matthew O Jackson. 2010. Peer pressure. Journal of the European Economic Association 8 (1):62--89

2010
[89]

Carneiro, Pedro, Italo Lopez Garcia, Kjell G Salvanes, and Emma Tominey. 2021. Intergenerational mobility and the timing of parental income. Journal of Political Economy, forthcoming

2021
[90]

Sacerdote, and James E

Carrell, Scott E., Bruce I. Sacerdote, and James E. West. 2013. From Natural Variation to Optimal Policy? The Importance of Endogenous Peer Group Formation. Econometrica 81 (3):855--882

2013
[91]

and Christopher B

Carter, Michael R. and Christopher B. Barrett. 2006. The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: An asset-based approach. The Journal of Development Studies 42 (2):178--199

2006
[92]

Case, Anne and Angus Deaton. 2021. Life expectancy in adulthood is falling for those without a BA degree, but as educational gaps have widened, racial gaps have narrowed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (11)

2021
[93]

Centola, Damon. 2018. How Behavior Spreads: The Science of Complex Contagions, vol. 3. Princeton University Press

2018
[94]

Charles, Maria and David B Grusky. 2005. Occupational ghettos: The worldwide segregation of women and men, vol. 200. Stanford University Press Stanford, CA

2005
[95]

Cheng, Chen and Yiqing Xing. 2021. Which Networks Permit Stable Allocations? A Theory of Network-Based Comparisons. Johns Hopkins Carey Business School Research Paper (20-01)

2021
[96]

Chetty, Raj. 2008. Moral hazard versus liquidity and optimal unemployment insurance. Journal of political Economy 116 (2):173--234

2008
[97]

--- --- ---. 2009. Sufficient statistics for welfare analysis: A bridge between structural and reduced-form methods. Annu. Rev. Econ. 1 (1):451--488

2009
[98]

Chetty, Raj, John N Friedman, Emmanuel Saez, Nicholas Turner, and Danny Yagan. 2020. Income segregation and intergenerational mobility across colleges in the United States. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 135 (3):1567--1633

2020
[99]

Chetty, Raj, David Grusky, Maximilian Hell, Nathaniel Hendren, Robert Manduca, and Jimmy Narang. 2017. The fading American dream: Trends in absolute income mobility since 1940. Science 356 (6336):398--406

2017
[100]

Chetty, Raj, Nathaniel Hendren, and Lawrence F. Katz. 2016. The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: New evidence from the Moving to Opportunity experiment. The American Economic Review 106 (4):855--902

2016
[101]

Chetty, Raj, Nathaniel Hendren, Patrick Kline, and Emmanuel Saez. 2014. Where is the land of opportunity? The geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 129 (4):1553--1623

2014
[102]

Chetty, Raj and Matthew O. Jackson. 2025. A Theory of Social Capital Formation and Economic Mobility. manuscript: Stanford University

2025
[103]

Chetty, Raj, Matthew O. Jackson, Theresa Kuchler, Johannes Stroebl, Nathan Hendren, Robert Fluegge, Sara Gong, Federico Gonzalez, Armelle Grondin, Matthew Jacob, Drew Johnston, Martin Koenen, Eduardo Laguna-Muggenburg, Florian Mudekereza, Tom Rutter, Nicolaj Thor, Wilbur Towns...

2022
[104]

--- --- ---. 2022 b . Social Capital in the United States II: Determinants of Economic Connectedness. Nature 608

2022
[105]

Larremore

Clauset, Aaron, Samuel Arbesman, and Daniel B. Larremore. 2015. Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks. Science advances 1 (1):e1400005

2015
[106]

Coleman, James S. 1974. Inequality, sociology, and moral philosophy. American Journal of Sociology 80 (3):739--764

1974
[107]

Coleman, James S. 1988. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology 94 (1):S95--S120

1988
[108]

and Christopher R

Conley, Timothy G. and Christopher R. Udry. 2010. Learning about a new technology: Pineapple in Ghana . The American Economic Review 100 (1):35--69

2010
[109]

Connor, Dylan Shane and Michael Storper. 2020. The changing geography of social mobility in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (48):30309--30317

2020
[110]

Corak, Miles. 2013. Income inequality, equality of opportunity, and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Economic Perspectives 27 (3):79--102

2013
[111]

--- --- ---. 2016. Inequality from Generation to Generation: The United States in Comparison. IZA DP No. 9929

2016
[112]

Jackson, and Paolo Pin

Currarini, Sergio, Matthew O. Jackson, and Paolo Pin. 2009. An economic model of friendship: Homophily, minorities, and segregation . Econometrica 77 (4):1003--1045

2009
[113]

--- --- ---. 2010. Identifying the roles of race-based choice and chance in high school friendship network formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (11):4857--4861

2010
[114]

Currie, Janet. 2001. Early childhood education programs. Journal of Economic perspectives 15 (2):213--238

2001
[115]

--- --- ---. 2006. The Take-Up of Social Benefits. Public Policy and the Income Distribution :80

2006
[116]

Cutler, David M and Edward L Glaeser. 2010. Social interactions and smoking. In Research findings in the economics of aging. University of Chicago Press, 123--141

2010
[117]

DellaVigna, Stefano, John A List, Ulrike Malmendier, and Gautam Rao. 2016. Voting to tell others. The Review of Economic Studies 84 (1):143--181

2016
[118]

DiMaggio, Paul and Filiz Garip. 2011. How network externalities can exacerbate intergroup inequality. American Journal of Sociology 116 (6):1887--1933

2011
[119]

--- --- ---. 2012. Network effects and social inequality. Annual review of sociology 38:93--118

2012
[120]

Doepke, Matthias, Giuseppe Sorrenti, and Fabrizio Zilibotti. 2019. The economics of parenting. Annual Review of Economics 11:55--84

2019
[121]

Duflo, Esther and Emanuel Saez. 2003. The Role of Information and Social Interactions in Retirement Plan Decisions: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics August:815--842

2003
[122]

Durkin, Kelley, Mark W Lipsey, Dale C Farran, and Sarah E Wiesen. 2022. Effects of a statewide pre-kindergarten program on children’s achievement and behavior through sixth grade. Developmental Psychology

2022
[123]

Durlauf, Steven N. 1996. A theory of persistent income inequality. Journal of Economic growth 1 (1):75--93

1996
[124]

Durlauf, Steven N and Ananth Seshadri. 2018. Understanding the great gatsby curve. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 32 (1):333--393

2018
[125]

o nberg, and Herbert Br \

Dustmann, Christian, Albrecht Glitz, Uta Sch \"o nberg, and Herbert Br \"u cker. 2016. Referral-based job search networks. The Review of Economic Studies 83 (2):514--546

2016
[126]

Dworczak, Piotr, Scott Duke Kominers, and Mohammad Akbarpour. 2019. Redistribution through markets. Econometrica, forthcoming

2019
[127]

Efferson, Charles, Sonja Vogt, and Ernst Fehr. 2020. The promise and the peril of using social influence to reverse harmful traditions. Nature human behaviour 4 (1):55--68

2020
[128]

Engels, Friedrich. 1845. The condition of the working class in England. Otto Wigand, Leipzig -- translated to english in 1887
[129]

Fagereng, Andreas, Magne Mogstad, and Marte Ronning. 2018. Why do wealthy parents have wealthy children? University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper (2019-22)

2018
[130]

Falk, Armin, Fabian Kosse, Pia Rosina Dovern-Pinger, Hannah Schildberg-H \"o risch, and Thomas Deckers. 2021. Socio-economic status and inequalities in children's IQ and economic preferences. Journal of Political Economy: forthcoming

2021
[131]

Felfe, Christina and Rafael Lalive. 2018. Does early child care affect children's development? Journal of Public Economics 159:33--53

2018
[132]

Castilla, and Paul Moore

Fernandez, Roberto M, Emilio J. Castilla, and Paul Moore. 2000. Social capital at work: Networks and employment at a phone center. American journal of sociology :1288--1356

2000
[133]

Fernandez, Roberto M and Roman V Galperin. 2014. The causal status of social capital in labor markets. Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks 40:445--462

2014
[134]

Fershtman, Chaim and Uri Gneezy. 2001. Discrimination in a segmented society: An experimental approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (1):351--377

2001
[135]

Fiorillo, Damiano and Nunzia Nappo. 2014. Job satisfaction in Italy: individual characteristics and social relations. International Journal of Social Economics

2014
[136]

Fix, Michael, George C Galster, and Raymond J Struyk. 1993. An overview of auditing for discrimination. Clear and convincing evidence: Measurement of discrimination in America 1:68

1993
[137]

Frick, Mira, Ryota Iijima, and Yuhta Ishii. 2020. Misinterpreting others and the fragility of social learning. Econometrica 88 (6):2281--2328

2020
[138]

Fryer Jr, Roland G, Steven D Levitt, John A List, and Anya Samek. 2020. Introducing CogX: A New Preschool Education Program Combining Parent and Child Interventions. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research

2020
[139]

Galbiati, Roberto and Giulio Zanella. 2012. The tax evasion social multiplier: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Public Economics 96 (5-6):485--494

2012
[140]

Galeotti, Andrea, Benjamin Golub, and Sanjeev Goyal. 2020. Targeting interventions in networks. Econometrica 88 (6):2445--2471

2020
[141]

Galeotti, Andrea and Luca Paolo Merlino. 2014. Endogenous job contact networks. International economic review 55 (4):1201--1226

2014
[142]

Gall, Thomas, Patrick Legros, and Andrew F Newman. 2019. College Diversity Policy and Investment Incentives. mimeo

2019
[143]

Garces, Eliana, Duncan Thomas, and Janet Currie. 2002. Longer-term effects of Head Start. The American Economic Review 92 (4):999--1012

2002
[144]

Heckman, and Victor Ronda

Garc a, Jorge Luis, James J. Heckman, and Victor Ronda. 2021. The Lasting Effects of Early Childhood Education on Promoting the Skills and Social Mobility of Disadvantaged African Americans. SSRN working paper https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3888323

2021 doi
[145]

Gelber, Alexander and Adam Isen. 2013. Children's schooling and parents' behavior: Evidence from the Head Start Impact Study. Journal of public Economics 101:25--38

2013
[146]

George, Henry. 1879. Progress and poverty. Reprinted: Cosimo, Inc
[147]

Sacerdote, and Jose A

Glaeser, Edward L., Bruce I. Sacerdote, and Jose A. Scheinkman. 2003. The social multiplier. Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (2-3):345--353

2003
[148]

Goldin, Claudia Dale and Lawrence F Katz. 2009. The race between education and technology. harvard university press

2009
[149]

Golub, Benjamin and Matthew O. Jackson. 2012. How Homophily Affects the Speed of Learning and Best-Response Dynamics . Quarterly Journal of Economics 127 (3):1287--1338

2012
[150]

Golub, Benjamin and Evan Sadler. 2021. Games on Endogenous Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.01587

2021 arXiv
[151]

Gomez, Matthieu. 2021. Decomposing the Rise in Top Wealth Shares. preprint

2021
[152]

Granovetter, Mark. 1988. The sociological and economic approaches to labor market analysis. Industries, firms, and jobs :187--216

1988
[153]

Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. The American Journal of Sociology 78 (6):1360--1380

1973
[154]

--- --- ---. 1995. Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers (Second Edition). University of Chicago Press

1995
[155]

Hangartner, Dominik, Daniel Kopp, and Michael Siegenthaler. 2021. Monitoring hiring discrimination through online recruitment platforms. Nature :1--5

2021
[156]

Harsanyi, John C. 1977. Rule utilitarianism and decision theory. Erkenntnis 11 (1):25--53

1977
[157]

Hasan, Sharique and Surendrakumar Bagde. 2013. The mechanics of social capital and academic performance in an Indian college. American Sociological Review 78 (6):1009--1032

2013
[158]

Violante

Heathcote, Jonathan, Fabrizio Perri, and Giovanni L. Violante. 2010. Unequal we stand: An empirical analysis of economic inequality in the United States, 1967--2006. Review of Economic dynamics 13 (1):15--51

2010
[159]

Heckman, James J. 2012. Invest in early childhood development: Reduce deficits, strengthen the economy. The Heckman Equation 7

2012
[160]

Savelyev, and Adam Yavitz

Heckman, James J., Seong Hyeok Moon, Rodrigo Pinto, Peter A. Savelyev, and Adam Yavitz. 2010. The rate of return to the HighScope Perry Preschool Program. Journal of public Economics 94 (1):114--128

2010
[161]

and Stefano Mosso

Heckman, James J. and Stefano Mosso. 2014. The economics of human development and social mobility. Annu. Rev. Econ. 6 (1):689--733

2014
[162]

Hendren, Nathaniel and Ben Sprung-Keyser. 2020. A unified welfare analysis of government policies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 135 (3):1209--1318

2020
[163]

Henrich, Joseph. 2015. The secret of our success: how culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Princeton University Press

2015
[164]

Herbst, Daniel and Nathaniel Hendren. 2021. Opportunity Unraveled: Private Information and the Missing Markets for Financing Human Capital. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper

2021
[165]

Holzer, Harry and David Neumark. 2000. Assessing affirmative action. Journal of Economic literature 38 (3):483--568

2000
[166]

Horv \'a th, Gergely. 2014. Occupational mismatch and social networks. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 106:442--468

2014
[167]

Aryanizations

Huber, Kilian, Volker Lindenthal, and Fabian Waldinger. 2021. Discrimination, Managers, and Firm Performance: Evidence from "Aryanizations" in Nazi Germany. Journal of Political Economy: forthcoming

2021
[168]

Hubmer, Joachim, Per Krusell, and Anthony A. Smith. 2020. Sources of US wealth inequality: Past, present, and future. In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2020, volume 35. University of Chicago Press

2020
[169]

Huggett, Mark, Gustavo Ventura, and Amir Yaron. 2011. Sources of lifetime inequality. American Economic Review 101 (7):2923--54

2011
[170]

Huggins, Robert and Piers Thompson. 2021. A behavioural theory of economic development: The uneven evolution of cities and regions. Oxford University Press

2021
[171]

Hurst, Charles E, Heather M Fitz Gibbon, and Anne M Nurse. 2016. Social inequality: Forms, causes, and consequences. Routledge

2016
[172]

Ioannides, Y.M. and L. Datcher-Loury. 2004. Job information networks, neighborhood effects and inequality. Journal of Economic Literature 424:1056 -- 1093

2004
[173]

Jackson, Matthew O. 2007. Social Structure, Segregation, and Economic Behavior. Nancy Schwartz Memorial Lecture, April 2007, Northwestern University, printed version: SSRN paper 1530885

2007
[174]

--- --- ---. 2019. The Human Network: How Your Social Position Determines Your Power, Beliefs, and Behaviors. Pantheon Books: New York

2019
[175]

--- --- ---. 2019b. The Friendship Paradox and Systematic Biases in Perceptions and Social Norms. Journal of Political Economy 127 (2):777--818
[176]

--- --- ---. 2020. A Typology of Social Capital and Associated Network Measures. Social Choice and Welfare https://doi-org/10.1007/s00355-019-01189-3

2020 doi
[177]

Nei, Erik Snowberg, and Leeat Yariv

Jackson, Matthew O., Stephen M. Nei, Erik Snowberg, and Leeat Yariv. 2022. The Evolution of Networks and Homophily. mimeo: Stanford University :

2022
[178]

Rodriguez-Barraquer, and Xu Tan

Jackson, Matthew O., Tomas R. Rodriguez-Barraquer, and Xu Tan. 2012. Social Capital and Social Quilts: Network Patterns of Favor Exchange . American Economic Review 102 (5):1857--1897

2012
[179]

and Evan C

Jackson, Matthew O. and Evan C. Storms. 2025. Behavioral Communities and the Atomic Structure of Networks. Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.04656, American Economic Journal: Microeconomics forthcoming

2025 arXiv
[180]

and Yves Zenou

Jackson, Matthew O. and Yves Zenou. 2014. Games on Networks. Handbook of Game Theory, Elsevier, edited by Young, H.P. and Zamir, S

2014
[181]

Jahani, Eaman, Samuel Fraiberger, Michael Bailey, and Dean Eckles. 2022. Origins and consequences of long ties in social networks. SocArXiv: 10.31235/osf.io/g2nkq

2022 doi
[182]

Jehiel, Philippe and Matthew V Leduc. 2021. On Why Affirmative Action May Never End and Why it Should. Available at SSRN 3842996

2021
[183]

Jimenez-Gomez, David. 2021. Social Pressure in Networks Induces Public Good Provision. Games 12 (1):4

2021
[184]

Jones, Charles I. 2015. Pareto and Piketty: The macroeconomics of top income and wealth inequality. Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (1):29--46

2015
[185]

Kaila, Martti, Emily Nix, and Krista Riukula. 2021. Disparate Impacts of Job Loss by Parental Income and Implications for Intergenerational Mobility. working paper

2021
[186]

Katz, Lawrence F and Bruce D Meyer. 1990. The impact of the potential duration of unemployment benefits on the duration of unemployment. Journal of public economics 41 (1):45--72

1990
[187]

Kearney, Melissa S and Phillip B Levine. 2015. Media influences on social outcomes: The impact of MTV's 16 and pregnant on teen childbearing. American Economic Review 105 (12):3597--3632

2015
[188]

Kets, Willemien, Garud Iyengar, Rajiv Sethi, and Samuel Bowles. 2011. Inequality and network structure. Games and Economic Behavior 73 (1):215--226

2011
[189]

Kim, Soobin. 2017. Intergenerational mobility in Korea. IZA Journal of Development and Migration 7 (1):1--18

2017
[190]

Krueger, Alan B and Bruce D Meyer. 2002. Labor supply effects of social insurance. Handbook of public economics 4:2327--2392

2002
[191]

Krugman, Paul. 2014. Why We’re in a New Gilded Age. The New York Review of Books May 8

2014
[192]

Krugman, Paul and Anthony J Venables. 1995. Globalization and the Inequality of Nations. The quarterly journal of economics 110 (4):857--880

1995
[193]

Kulic, Nevena, Jan Skopek, Moris Triventi, and Hans-Peter Blossfeld. 2019. Social Background and Children's Cognitive Skills: The Role of Early Childhood Education and Care in a Cross-National Perspective. Annual Review of Sociology 45:557--579

2019
[194]

Kuznets, Simon. 1955. Economic growth and income inequality. The American economic review 45 (1):1--28

1955
[195]

La Ferrara, Eliana. 2002. Inequality and group participation: theory and evidence from rural Tanzania. Journal of Public Economics 85 (2):235--273

2002
[196]

Lalanne, Marie and Paul Seabright. 2016. The old boy network: The impact of professional networks on remuneration in top executive jobs. SAFE Working Paper No 123

2016
[197]

Lang, Kevin and Jee-Yeon K Lehmann. 2012. Racial discrimination in the labor market: Theory and empirics. Journal of Economic Literature 50 (4):959--1006

2012
[198]

Lareau, Annette. 2002. Invisible inequality: Social class and childrearing in black families and white families. American sociological review :747--776

2002
[199]

--- --- ---. 2011. Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Univ of California Press

2011
[200]

Laschever, Ron A. 2013. The Doughboys Network: Social Interactions and Labor Market Outcomes of World War I Veterans. SSRN discussion paper 1205543

2013
[201]

and Robert K

Lazarsfeld, Paul F. and Robert K. Merton. 1954. Friendship as a Social Process: A Substantive and Methodological Analysis. in: Freedom and Control in Modern Society, M. Berger, ed., New York: Van Nostrand

1954
[202]

Lobel, Ilan and Evan Sadler. 2016 a . Preferences, homophily, and social learning. Operations Research 64 (3):564--584

2016
[203]

--- --- ---. 2016 b . Preferences, homophily, and social learning. Operations Research 64 (3):564--584

2016
[204]

Loury, Glenn. 1977. A dynamic theory of racial income differences. Women, minorities, and employment discrimination 153:86--153

1977
[205]

Loury, Glenn C. 1981. Intergenerational Transfers and the Distribution of Earnings. Econometrica 49 (4):843--867. ://www.jstor.org/stable/1912506

1981
[206]

--- --- ---. 2009. The anatomy of racial inequality. Harvard University Press

2009
[207]

Mankiw, N Gregory. 2015. Yes, r> g. So what? American Economic Review 105 (5):43--47

2015
[208]

Marx, Karl. 1867. Das Kapital, Kritik der politischen \"O konomie . Verlag von Otto Meisner
[209]

McCall, Leslie. 2001. Sources of racial wage inequality in metropolitan labor markets: Racial, ethnic, and gender differences. American Sociological Review :520--541

2001
[210]

McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M. Cook. 2001. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27:415--444

2001
[211]

Mill, John Stuart. 1859 a . On Liberty. John W. Parker and Son, UK
[212]

--- --- ---. 1859 b . Utilitarianism (1863). Utilitarianism, Liberty, Representative Government :7--9
[213]

--- --- ---. 1869. The subjection of women, vol. 1. Transaction Publishers
[214]

Miller, Conrad. 2017. The persistent effect of temporary affirmative action. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 9 (3):152--90

2017
[215]

Mirrlees, James A. 1971. An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation. The review of economic studies 38 (2):175--208

1971
[216]

Mirza, M Usman, Chi Xu, Bas van Bavel, Egbert H van Nes, and Marten Scheffer. 2021. Global inequality remotely sensed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (18)

2021
[217]

Montgomery, James D. 1991. Social networks and labor-market outcomes: Toward an economic analysis . The American Economic Review 81 (5):1408--1418

1991
[218]

Ong, Rucha Makati, Matthew O

Morelli, Sylvia A., Desmond C. Ong, Rucha Makati, Matthew O. Jackson, and Jamil Zaki. 2017. Empathy and well-being correlate with centrality in different social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (37):9843--9847

2017
[219]

Mosleh, Mohsen, Cameron Martel, Dean Eckles, and David G Rand. 2021. Shared partisanship dramatically increases social tie formation in a Twitter field experiment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (7)

2021
[220]

Munshi, Kaivan. 2003. Networks in the Modern Economy: Mexican Migrants in the US Labor Market . Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (2):549--599

2003
[221]

Munshi, Kaivan and Mark Rosenzweig. 2009. Why is mobility in India so low? Social insurance, inequality, and growth. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research

2009
[222]

and George P

Myers, Charles A. and George P. Shultz. 1951. The dynamics of a labor market. Greenwood Press

1951
[223]

Nekoei, Arash and David Seim. 2019. How do inheritances shape wealth inequality? Theory and evidence from Sweden. SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=3192778

2019
[224]

Newman, Jerry M. 1978. Discrimination in recruitment: An empirical analysis. ILR Review 32 (1):15--23

1978
[225]

Okafor, Chika O. 2020. Social networks as a mechanism for discrimination. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.15988

2020 arXiv
[226]

Opper, Sonja, Victor Nee, and Stefan Brehm. 2015. Homophily in the career mobility of China’s political elite. Social Science Research 54:332--352

2015
[227]

Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press

1990
[228]

Page, Scott E. 2018. The model thinker: What you need to know to make data work for you. Basic Books

2018
[229]

Pager, Devah and Hana Shepherd. 2008. The sociology of discrimination: Racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and consumer markets. Annu. Rev. Sociol 34:181--209

2008
[230]

Pallais, Amanda and Emily Glassberg Sands. 2016. Why the Referential Treatment: Evidence from Field Experiments on Referrals. Journal of Political Economy 124:6:1793--1828

2016
[231]

Patacchini, Eleonora and Yves Zenou. 2012. Ethnic networks and employment outcomes. Regional Science and Urban Economics 42 (6):938--949

2012
[232]

Persson, Torsten and Guido Tabellini. 1994. Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? The American Economic Review 84 (3):600--621

1994
[233]

Phelps, Edmund S. 1972. The statistical theory of racism and sexism. The american economic review 62 (4):659--661

1972
[234]

Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard University Press

2014
[235]

--- --- ---. 2015. About capital in the twenty-first century. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 105 (5):48--53

2015
[236]

Ponzo, Michela and Vincenzo Scoppa. 2010. The use of informal networks in Italy: Efficiency or favoritism? The Journal of Socio-Economics 39 (1):89--99

2010
[237]

Putnam, Robert D. 2016. Our kids: The American dream in crisis. Simon and Schuster

2016
[238]

Rao, Gautam. 2019. Familiarity does not breed contempt: Generosity, discrimination, and diversity in Delhi schools. American Economic Review 109 (3):774--809

2019
[239]

Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Harvard university press

1971
[240]

Rees, Albert. 1966. Information networks in labor markets. The American Economic Review 56 (1/2):559--566

1966
[241]

Rees, Albert, George Pratt Shultz et al. 1970. Workers and wages in an urban labor market. University of Chicago Press

1970
[242]

Rivera, Lauren A. 2012. Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms. American sociological review 77 (6):999--1022

2012
[243]

Roberts, Steven O and Michael Rizzo. 2020. The Psychology of American Racism. American Psychologist

2020
[244]

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1754. Discourse on the origin and basis of inequality among men. French
[245]

--- --- ---. 1762. The social contract
[246]

Fernandez

Rubineau, Brian and Roberto M. Fernandez. 2013. Missing links: Referrer behavior and job segregation. Management Science 59 (11):2470--2489

2013
[247]

Sacerdote, Bruce. 2001. Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. The Quarterly journal of economics 116 (2):681--704

2001
[248]

--- --- ---. 2007. How large are the effects from changes in family environment? A study of Korean American adoptees. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (1):119--157

2007
[249]

--- --- ---. 2011. Peer effects in education: How might they work, how big are they and how much do we know thus far? Handbook of the Economics of Education, edited by Eric A. Hanushek, Stephen Machin and Ludger Woessmann 3 (3):249--277

2011
[250]

Saez, Emmanuel and Gabriel Zucman. 2016. Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from capitalized income tax data. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (2):519--578

2016
[251]

Sen, Amartya. 1992. Inequality reexamined. Oxford University Press

1992
[252]

Skopek, Jan, Florian Schulz, and Hans-Peter Blossfeld. 2010. Who Contacts Whom? Educational Homophily in Online Mate Selection. European Sociological Review

2010
[253]

Small, Mario Luis. 2006. Neighborhood institutions as resource brokers: Childcare centers, interorganizational ties, and resource access among the poor. Social Problems 53 (2):274--292

2006
[254]

--- --- ---. 2009. Unanticipated gains: Origins of network inequality in everyday life. Oxford University Press

2009
[255]

Small, Mario Luis, David J Harding, and Mich \`e le Lamont. 2010. Reconsidering culture and poverty

2010
[256]

Smith, Matthew, Danny Yagan, Owen Zidar, and Eric Zwick. 2019. Capitalists in the Twenty-first Century. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 134 (4):1675--1745

2019
[257]

Stephens, Nicole M, Hazel Rose Markus, and L Taylor Phillips. 2014. Social class culture cycles: How three gateway contexts shape selves and fuel inequality. Annual review of psychology 65:611--634

2014
[258]

Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2012. The price of inequality: How today's divided society endangers our future. WW Norton & Company

2012
[259]

Strother, Logan, Spencer Piston, Ezra Golberstein, Sarah E Gollust, and Daniel Eisenberg. 2021. College roommates have a modest but significant influence on each other’s political ideology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (2)

2021
[260]

Thomas, Reuben J. 2020. Online exogamy reconsidered: Estimating the Internet’s effects on racial, educational, religious, political and age assortative mating. Social Forces 98 (3):1257--1286

2020
[261]

Tinbergen, Jan. 1975. Income distribution: Analysis and policies. Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland

1975
[262]

Topa, Giorgio. 2011. Chapter 22 - Labor Markets and Referrals. In Handbook of Social Economics, vol. 1, edited by Jess Benhabib, Alberto Bisin, and Matthew O. Jackson. North-Holland, 1193 -- 1221. ://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780444537072000050

2011
[263]

Verbrugge, Lois M. 1977. The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices. Social Forces 56 (2):576--597

1977
[264]

Voorheis, John, Nolan McCarty, and Boris Shor. 2015. Unequal incomes, ideology and gridlock: How rising inequality increases political polarization. Ideology and Gridlock: How Rising Inequality Increases Political Polarization (August 21, 2015)

2015
[265]

Weber, Max. 1921. Economy and Society (German: Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie). University of California Press, English Translation 1978

1921
[266]

1921, 1978

--- --- ---. 1921, 1978. Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology, vol. 1. Univ of California Press

1921
[267]

Wollstonecraft, Mary. 1792. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, with Strictures on Political and Moral Subject. Thomas and Andrews
[268]

Ye, Karen J. 2020. Understanding Peer Effects in Educational Decisions: Evidence from Theory and a Field Experiment. mimeo: University of Chicago

2020
[269]

Zeltzer, Dan. 2020. Gender homophily in referral networks: Consequences for the medicare physician earnings gap. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 12 (2):169--97

2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Abramitzky, Ran. 2011. Lessons from the Kibbutz on the Equality--Incentives Trade-off. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 25 (1):185--207

2011

[2] [2]

--- --- ---. 2018. The Mystery of the Kibbutz: Egalitarian Principles in a Capitalist World. Princeton University Press

2018

[3] [3]

Abramitzky, Ran, Leah Platt Boustan, Elisa J \'a come, and Santiago P \'e rez. 2019. Intergenerational Mobility of Immigrants in the US over Two Centuries. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research

2019

[4] [4]

Acemoglu, Daron and Matthew O. Jackson. 2014. History, expectations, and leadership in the evolution of social norms. The Review of Economic Studies 82 (2):423--456

2014

[5] [5]

Robinson

Acemoglu, Daron and James A. Robinson. 2015. The rise and decline of general laws of capitalism. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (1):3--28

2015

[6] [6]

Adermon, Adrian, Mikael Lindahl, and M rten Palme. 2021. Dynastic Human Capital, Inequality and Intergenerational Mobility. American Economic Review 111(5):1523--1548

2021

[7] [7]

and Katherine Newman

Adler, Nancy E. and Katherine Newman. 2002. Socioeconomic disparities in health: pathways and policies. Health affairs 21 (2):60--76

2002

[8] [8]

Agostinelli, Francesco, Matthias Doepke, Giuseppe Sorrenti, and Fabrizio Zilibotti. 2020. It takes a village: the economics of parenting with neighborhood and peer effects. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research

2020