Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Non-resonant effects in pilot-wave hydrodynamics

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Impact-phase flips, not fixed resonance, drive the odd motions of walking droplets.

desk verdict The paper's new vertical-horizontal coupled model is a step beyond stroboscopic theory, but its wave field omits a quadrature component that may undermine the very non-resonant effects it claims to capture. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14996 v2 pith:OCYKN7IU submitted 2024-11-22 physics.flu-dyn nlin.CD

Bauyrzhan K. Primkulov , Davis J. Evans , Joel B. Been , John W.M. Bush This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dynnlin.CD
keywords pilot-wavehydrodynamicswalkingdropletsnon-resonanteffectsimpactphasebouncingphasesFaradaywaveshydrodynamicquantumanalogsstroboscopicmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the fixed impact phase assumed by stroboscopic models is the reason several observed walker behaviors have resisted explanation. It presents a coupled model that resolves the drop's vertical and horizontal dynamics while letting the wave field feed back into the impact force, and reports that this model reproduces the swaying onset of motion, intermittent walking, and chaotic speed oscillations seen in experiments. The central claim is that these states arise from non-resonant effects: the impact phase varies sporadically, and the drop can switch between two distinct bouncing phases, called up and down. If the claim holds, these previously puzzling states are not separate puzzles but one phenomenon driven by the degeneracy in the vertical dynamics.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is a coupled walker model built on Moláček and Bush's equations but with a linear spring impact law, Eq. (3), in which the normal force depends on the wave height h and its time derivative at the drop's base. Because the wave field, Eq. (4), is a superposition of standing waves whose amplitudes depend on the timing of each impact, the vertical dynamics and the wave field are coupled in both directions. The impact phase Φ_i, defined by Eq. (5), is the observable that organizes the phenomena: values above or below π correspond to the up and down walking states, and switching between them produces direction reversals and chaotic horizontal motion. This two-way coupling is what the stroboscopic models omit.

What would settle it

Measure the impact phase of a single walker confined in a circular corral at high memory with high-speed imaging; the central claim predicts a bimodal distribution of Φ_i with peaks separated by π and switches whose frequency matches the model's Markov matrix. A finding of a unimodal phase distribution with no switching would falsify the mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core discovery is that relaxing the resonance assumption – allowing the droplet's impact phase with its pilot wave to vary rather than fixing it – resolves a family of previously unexplained free-walker states. In the model, a walker starting from rest sways before locking into one of two steady states, termed up and down, distinguished by whether the impact phase lies above or below π. Intermittent walkers arise when the vertical dynamics is chaotic, producing a bimodal distribution of impact phases and diffusion-like motion; chaotic walkers show the same two-phase structure with rare switches that reverse direction. The same phase-switching mechanism explains the sporadic up-down flips seen when resonant walkers are confined at high memory, a feature that had been observed in corral experiments but not rationalized.

Load-bearing premise

The linear spring impact law with constants Dv = 0.48 and Cv = 0.59 must correctly capture the force during drop-bath impacts including the influence of the local wave height; if this law misrepresents the contact force, the up/down states and phase switching would not emerge as described.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Stroboscopic models cannot capture swaying onset, mixed-state, intermittent, or chaotic walkers because they fix the impact phase; any model of these states must resolve the vertical dynamics.
  • The up/down degeneracy provides a mechanism for phase flips in corrals, meaning corral statistics may be explained by stochastic switching between two walking states.
  • The model bridges the bouncing, horizontal-motion, and statistical-convergence timescales, so it can simulate walker statistics over long times while retaining non-resonant dynamics.
  • The phase-switching framework suggests a 'stochastic stroboscopic' model in which up-down transitions are represented by a Markov matrix, making long-time simulations computationally cheap.
  • When a standing Faraday wave is added, up and down walkers see opposite wave phases, so phase switching could produce apparent diffraction-like effects in upcoming hydrodynamic quantum analogs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If phase-switching is the dominant source of randomness at high memory, the diffusion coefficient in confined geometries may be set by the switch rate rather than by wave memory alone; varying the corral size would test this.
  • The same up/down degeneracy might explain why walkers above the Faraday threshold show a characteristic diffusion length λF: phase switches could serve as the direction-reversal mechanism there too.
  • The Markov structure proposed for phase switching could be measured directly in experiments; if transition probabilities depend on position or memory, the model could be generalized into a position-dependent Markov process.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a model of pilot-wave hydrodynamics that relaxes the fixed-impact-phase ('resonance') assumption of stroboscopic models by resolving the droplet's vertical dynamics alongside its horizontal motion. The model combines a linear-spring impact law for the vertical force with a memory wave field written as a sum of phase-locked cos(Ωτ/2) standing waves, and it is used to simulate free and confined walkers. The authors report that the model reproduces several previously unexplained experimental features: swaying at the onset of walking, mixed-state and intermittent walkers, chaotic walking with sporadic phase flips, and up/down bouncing-phase switching in high-memory confinement. They argue that the up/down degeneracy is essential for understanding corral statistics and propose a Markovian 'stochastic stroboscopic' extension.

Significance. If the model's central claims hold, this is a valuable contribution: it provides a single, computationally efficient framework that spans the bouncing, horizontal-motion, and statistical timescales, and it offers a concrete mechanistic explanation for non-resonant walker states that stroboscopic models cannot capture. The model is transparently specified, and the constants Dv, Cv, and Dh are adopted rather than fitted to the new phenomena, which mitigates concerns about circularity. The up/down phase-switching mechanism is a falsifiable, experimentally accessible prediction. However, the significance is partly conditional on the justification of the wave ansatz in Eq. (4) and on the robustness of the reported single-trajectory demonstrations.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III, Eq. (4)] The wave field is written as a sum of cos(Ωτ/2) standing waves with amplitudes Ai ∝ ∫ FN(s) sin(Ωs/2) ds, but the manuscript does not justify why the quadrature component of each impact-generated wave is omitted. For a damped oscillator at frequency Ω/2, the causal response to an impact at τi is sin(Ω(τ−τi)/2), which decomposes into sin(Ωτ/2)cos(Ωτi/2) − cos(Ωτ/2)sin(Ωτi/2); Eq. (4) retains only the second term. The omitted component is proportional to ∫ FN(s) cos(Ωs/2) ds and is nonzero whenever cos(Ωτi/2) ≠ 0, precisely the non-resonant regime the paper studies. Since h and ḣ enter the impact law in Eq. (3), the reported swaying, intermittent, chaotic, and phase-flip dynamics could be artifacts of this truncated wave representation. Please derive Eq. (4) from the linearized Faraday wave equation, state explicitly the phase-locking assumption that removes the quadrature component, or validate the ansatz against a direct numerical solution for an isolated non-resonant impact.
  2. [§V, Fig. 10] The claim that up/down phase switching is critical to confined high-memory statistics rests on a single simulation at Ω = 0.8, Γ/ΓF = 0.99, with a central force F(r) = −7.85 × 10−5 r, and no sensitivity analysis is reported for Dv, Cv, Dh, or the central-force strength. The Markov transition matrix presented in §VI is stated without showing how it was computed, its sampling error, or whether the switching process is stationary over the simulation window. Given that these statistics are a central novel result, I ask for parameter sweeps (or at least a demonstration that the switching behavior persists under reasonable variations around the adopted constants) and an explicit description of how the transition matrix is estimated.
  3. [§IV.B, §V] Quantitative claims such as the intermittent-walker diffusion coefficient D ≈ 0.0014 (Fig. 7) and the phase-flip statistics in confinement are presented without error bars or a comparison to experimental measurements in the same parameter regime. The paper compares D only to the above-threshold Faraday random walk of Tambasco et al., not to below-threshold experiments. Please clarify whether these quantities are meant as predictions or as qualitative illustrations, and, if predictions, provide ensemble statistics and, where possible, a quantitative comparison to the videos cited.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption says 'Φi as defined in Eq. 4', but the impact phase is defined in Eq. (5); please correct the cross-reference.
  2. [Eq. (4)] The spatial damping factor appears as e^{−r^{−2}}, which is exp(−1/r²); I suspect this is a typo for e^{−r²} from the Couchman et al. spatial kernel. Please check the exponent against the cited source.
  3. [Fig. 3 and §II] The manuscript states that experiments were 'both performed in this study and previously reported', but no experimental methods or parameters are given for the new videos (e.g., drop radius, fluid viscosity, forcing amplitude and frequency). Please state which observations are new and provide the corresponding experimental details, or clearly attribute them to the original works.
  4. [§VI, Markov matrix] The 2×2 transition matrix M would be clearer if the rows and columns were labeled as 'up' and 'down' states, and if the text explained whether the entries are fractions of bounces or of switching events.
  5. [Table I and Eq. (2)] Please use consistent notation for the air-drag coefficient: the manuscript writes '9/2 Oh_a' with a missing space in Eq. (2), and the table defines Oh_a after Oh_e; a reader might confuse the two.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the claimed non-resonant phenomena emerge from time-integrating an explicitly adopted model, with only minor reliance on self-cited model components.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain from Eqs. (1)-(4). The vertical impact law Eq. (3) and the wave-field form Eq. (4), including the constants Dh=0.17, Dv=0.48, and Cv=0.59, are adopted from Moláček and Bush and from Couchman et al.; they are not fitted in this paper to the swaying, intermittent, or phase-flipping phenomena that the paper reports. The claimed results—swaying onset, up/down bouncing-phase states, mixed-state and intermittent walkers, chaotic phase flips, and confined-walker statistics—are obtained by numerically integrating the coupled ordinary differential equations, so they are emergent consequences of the model rather than restatements of its inputs. The impact phase Φ_i defined in Eq. (5) is derived from F_N and controls the wave amplitude A_i in Eq. (4), but Φ_i itself is dynamically evolved, and the correlation between Φ_i flips and direction reversals is reported as a numerical observation in Figs. 8 and 10, not imposed by construction. I also weighed the skeptical objection that Eq. (4) keeps only the cos(Ωτ/2) component of each impact-generated wave, dropping the sin(Ωτ/2) cos(Ωτ_i/2) quadrature that is nonzero off resonance. That is a legitimate accuracy and causality concern about the adopted standing-wave ansatz, but the paper states this wave form explicitly and attributes it to prior work; it does not secretly define the target phenomena in terms of the ansatz. The self-citations supply model ingredients—the wave kernel, spring constants, and damping coefficients—that are independently motivated by earlier experiments and simulations, so they are not load-bearing in the sense of forcing the conclusions. Hence no prediction reduces by construction to a fit or to a self-citation chain; the only reservation is the paper's heavy reliance on group-internal model components, which warrants a low but nonzero circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model is built on prior empirical impact coefficients and the linearized wave-superposition framework; none of these are fitted to the non-resonant phenomena the paper explains, which lowers circularity, but their unvalidated nature is the main source of correctness risk.

free parameters (4)
  • Dv = 0.48
    Vertical impact damping coefficient adopted from Couchman et al. (2019); controls energy loss and thus the impact phase evolution that drives all non-resonant effects.
  • Cv = 0.59
    Vertical spring constant adopted from Couchman et al. (2019); sets the bouncing period and phase response.
  • Dh = 0.17
    Horizontal impact drag coefficient from Molacek and Bush (2013); affects walking speed and stability thresholds.
  • Central force strength = -7.85e-5 (dimensionless)
    Hand-chosen dimensionless confining force used to model the harmonic trap and corral; no experimental potential calibration is given, yet the phase-flip statistics in Fig. 10 depend on it.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Linear spring impact model: FN = H[-Dv(zp_dot - zb_dot - h_dot) - Cv(zp - zb - h)] with constants Dv = 0.48 and Cv = 0.59 (Eq. 3)
    All vertical dynamics and impact phase statistics derive from this force law; the constants are adopted from Couchman et al. (2019) without re-fitting or validation against new experiments.
  • domain assumption Pilot wave is a linear superposition of standing waves with prescribed temporal decay and a Bessel-type spatial kernel (Eq. 4)
    Nonlinear wave interactions, wave advection, and finite-amplitude corrections are neglected; the spatial kernel and decay come from prior linearized models.
  • domain assumption Impact-generated wave amplitude is proportional to the contact-time integral of FN(s) sin(Omega s/2) (Eq. after Eq. 4)
    The amplitude-phase coupling is the mechanism by which non-resonant impact phases alter the wave field; it assumes each impact creates a Faraday wave with amplitude set by the impulse.
  • domain assumption The impact phase Phi_i computed as the contact-time weighted average of Omega s/2 (Eq. 5) is the relevant order parameter for drop-wave resonance
    The model's central claims are framed in terms of Phi_i; if a different phase definition were needed, the up/down state distinction could change.
  • standard math Deep-bath Faraday dispersion relation k_F^3 + k_F Bo = Omega^2/4 (Table I)
    Standard linear Faraday theory used to set the wavenumber; not in dispute.
  • standard math Fourth-order Runge-Kutta integration and impact-triggered wave updates accurately approximate the ODE system
    No convergence study or event-detection details are provided, so numerical reliability is assumed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-resonant effects in pilot-wave hydrodynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OCYKN7IU

@misc{pith2026241114996,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-resonant effects in pilot-wave hydrodynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OCYKN7IU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14996}
}
read the original abstract

Pilot-wave hydrodynamics concerns the dynamics of 'walkers,' droplets walking on a vibrating bath, and has provided the basis for the burgeoning field of hydrodynamic quantum analogs. We here explore a theoretical model of pilot-wave hydrodynamics that relaxes the simplifying assumption of resonance between the droplet and its pilot wave, specifically the assumption of a fixed impact phase between the bouncing drop and its wave field. The model captures both the vertical and horizontal dynamics of the drop, allowing one to examine non-resonant effects for both free and constrained walkers. The model provides new rationale for a number of previously reported but poorly understood features of free walker motion in pilot-wave hydrodynamics, including colinear swaying at the onset of motion, intermittent walking, and chaotic speed oscillations, all of which are accompanied by sporadic changes in the impact phase of the bouncing drop. The model also highlights the degeneracy in the droplets' vertical dynamics, specifically, the possibility of two distinct bouncing phases and of switching between the two. Consideration of this degeneracy is critical to understanding the droplet dynamics and statistics emerging in confined geometries at high memory and the interaction of walking droplets with standing Faraday waves.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14996 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Photograph of a millimetric walker traversing a silicone oil bath. The walker is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Phase diagram adapted from Wind-Willassen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Non-resonant effects in pilot-wave hydrodynamics. (a) The swaying onset of rectilinear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Simulations of non-resonant effects arising at the onset of motion of (2,1) walkers. (a) Ver [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Simulations of the mixed-state walker corresponding to point B (Ω = 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Simulation of the intermittent walker corresponding to point C (Ω = 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Numerical simulation of 360 intermittent walkers moving along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Simulations of a chaotic walker corresponding to point D (Ω = 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The trajectories of walkers confined by a dimensionless central force [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Simulation of the (2,1) walker detailed in Fig. 4 when confined by a dimensionless central [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Diffraction of walking drops by a standing Faraday wave

    physics.flu-dyn 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Droplets walking on a vibrating bath are diffracted by a standing Faraday wave, yielding a Kapitza-Dirac-like statistical diffraction pattern and phase-based sorting.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    author author John W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title The new wave of pilot-wave theory , \ 10.1063/PT.3.2882 journal journal Physics Today \ volume 68 ,\ pages 47--53 ( year 2015 a ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/pt.3.2882 2015

  2. [2]

    author author John W.M. \ Bush ,\ title title Pilot- Wave Hydrodynamics , \ 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010814-014506 journal journal Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 47 ,\ pages 269--292 ( year 2015 b ) NoStop

    doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-010814-014506 2015

  3. [3]

    author author John W. M. \ Bush , author Yves \ Couder , author Tristan \ Gilet , author Paul A. \ Milewski , \ and\ author André \ Nachbin ,\ title title Introduction to focus issue on hydrodynamic quantum analogs , \ 10.1063/1.5055383 journal journal Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science \ volume 28 ,\ pages 096001 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5055383

  4. [4]

    \ Bush \ and\ author Anand U

    author author John W.M. \ Bush \ and\ author Anand U. \ Oza ,\ title title Hydrodynamic quantum analogs , \ 10.1088/1361-6633/abc22c journal journal Reports on Progress in Physics \ volume 84 ,\ pages 41 ( year 2021 ) ,\ note publisher: IOP Publishing Ltd NoStop

    doi:10.1088/1361-6633/abc22c 2021

  5. [5]

    thesis ,\ school Migration-université en cours d'affectation

    author author Louis \ de Broglie ,\ title Recherches sur la théorie des quanta ,\ @noop Ph.D. thesis ,\ school Migration-université en cours d'affectation. ( year 1924 ) NoStop

    work page 1924

  6. [6]

    author author J Bricmont ,\ title title History of quantum mechanics or the comedy of errors , \ @noop journal journal International Journal of Quantum Foundations \ volume 3 ,\ pages 31--64 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    author author Adam Forrest \ Kay ,\ @noop title Escape from Shadow Physics : The Quest to End the Dark Ages of Quantum Theory \ ( publisher Basic Books ,\ year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    author author Aurélien \ Drezet , author Pierre \ Jamet , author Donatien \ Bertschy , author Arnaud \ Ralko , \ and\ author Cédric \ Poulain ,\ title title Mechanical analog of quantum bradyons and tachyons , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.102.052206 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 102 ,\ pages 052206 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.102.052206

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    author author Yuval \ Dagan \ and\ author John W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Hydrodynamic quantum field theory: the free particle , \ 10.5802/crmeca.34 journal journal Comptes Rendus. Mécanique \ volume 348 ,\ pages 555--571 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  2. [10]

    author author Matthew \ Durey \ and\ author John W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Hydrodynamic Quantum Field Theory : The Onset of Particle Motion and the Form of the Pilot Wave , \ 10.3389/fphy.2020.00300 journal journal Frontiers in Physics \ volume 8 ,\ pages 300 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  3. [11]

    author author David \ Darrow \ and\ author John W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Revisiting de Broglie ’s Double - Solution Pilot - Wave Theory with a Lorentz - Covariant Lagrangian Framework , \ 10.3390/sym16020149 journal journal Symmetry \ volume 16 ,\ pages 149 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  4. [12]

    author author Stéphane \ Perrard , author Matthieu \ Labousse , author Marc \ Miskin , author Emmanuel \ Fort , \ and\ author Yves \ Couder ,\ title title Self-organization into quantized eigenstates of a classical wave-driven particle , \ 10.1038/ncomms4219 journal journal Na...

    doi

  5. [13]

    \ Harris , author Julien \ Moukhtar , author Emmanuel \ Fort , author Yves \ Couder , \ and\ author John W

    author author Daniel M. \ Harris , author Julien \ Moukhtar , author Emmanuel \ Fort , author Yves \ Couder , \ and\ author John W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Wavelike statistics from pilot-wave dynamics in a circular corral , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.88.011001 journal journal Physica...

    doi

  6. [14]

    \ Sáenz , author Tudor \ Cristea-Platon , \ and\ author John W

    author author Pedro J. \ Sáenz , author Tudor \ Cristea-Platon , \ and\ author John W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Statistical projection effects in a hydrodynamic pilot-wave system , \ 10.1038/s41567-017-0003-x journal journal Nature Physics 2017 14:3 \ volume 14 ,\ pages 315--3...

    doi

  7. [15]

    author author M. F. \ Crommie , author C. P. \ Lutz , \ and\ author D. M. \ Eigler ,\ title title Confinement of Electrons to Quantum Corrals on a Metal Surface , \ 10.1126/science.262.5131.218 journal journal Science \ volume 262 ,\ pages 218--220 ( year 1993 a ) NoStop

    doi

  8. [16]

    author author M. F. \ Crommie , author C. P. \ Lutz , \ and\ author D. M. \ Eigler ,\ title title Imaging standing waves in a two-dimensional electron gas , \ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 363 ,\ pages 524--527 ( year 1993 b ) NoStop

    1993

  9. [17]

    author author T. B. \ Benjamin \ and\ author F. Ursell ,\ title title The stability of the plane free surface of a liquid in vertical periodic motion , \ 10.1098/rspa.1954.0218 journal journal Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Scie...

    1954

  10. [18]

    author author Jearl \ Walker ,\ title title The Amateur Scientist , \ @noop journal journal Scientific American Magazine \ volume 238 ,\ pages 151 ( year 1978 ) NoStop

    1978

  11. [19]

    Couder , author E

    author author Y. Couder , author E. Fort , author C.-H. \ Gautier , \ and\ author A. Boudaoud ,\ title title From Bouncing to Floating : Noncoalescence of Drops on a Fluid Bath , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.177801 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 94 ,\ pages 17780...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Terwagne , author N

    author author D. Terwagne , author N. Vandewalle , \ and\ author S. Dorbolo ,\ title title Lifetime of a bouncing droplet , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.056311 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 76 ,\ pages 056311 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    doi

  13. [21]

    Terwagne , author T

    author author D. Terwagne , author T. Gilet , author N. Vandewalle , \ and\ author S. Dorbolo ,\ title title Metastable bouncing droplets , \ 10.1063/1.3139138 journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 21 ,\ pages 054103 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    doi

  14. [22]

    author author Antonin \ Eddi , author Eric \ Sultan , author Julien \ Moukhtar , author Emmanuel \ Fort , author Maurice \ Rossi , \ and\ author Yves \ Couder ,\ title title Information stored in Faraday waves: the origin of a path memory , \ 10.1017/S0022112011000176 journal ...

    doi

  15. [23]

    Couder , author S

    author author Y. Couder , author S. Protière , author E. Fort , \ and\ author A. Boudaoud ,\ title title Walking and orbiting droplets , \ 10.1038/437208a journal journal Nature 2005 437:7056 \ volume 437 ,\ pages 208--208 ( year 2005 b ) ,\ note publisher: Nature Publishing G...

    2005 doi

  16. [24]

    author author S. E. \ Turton , author M. M. P. \ Couchman , \ and\ author J. W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title A review of the theoretical modeling of walking droplets: Toward a generalized pilot-wave framework , \ 10.1063/1.5032221 journal journal Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journa...

    doi

  17. [25]

    author author Jan \ Moláček \ and\ author John W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Drops bouncing on a vibrating bath , \ 10.1017/jfm.2013.279 journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 727 ,\ pages 582--611 ( year 2013 a ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  18. [26]

    author author Jan \ Moláček \ and\ author John W.M. \ Bush ,\ title title Drops walking on a vibrating bath: Towards a hydrodynamic pilot-wave theory , \ 10.1017/jfm.2013.280 journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 727 ,\ pages 612--647 ( year 2013 b ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  19. [27]

    \ Milewski , author Carlos A

    author author Paul A. \ Milewski , author Carlos A. \ Galeano-Rios , author André \ Nachbin , \ and\ author John W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Faraday pilot-wave dynamics: modelling and computation , \ 10.1017/jfm.2015.386 journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 778 ...

    2015 doi

  20. [28]

    \ Galeano-Rios , author Paul A

    author author Carlos A. \ Galeano-Rios , author Paul A. \ Milewski , \ and\ author J.-M. \ Vanden-Broeck ,\ title title Non-wetting impact of a sphere onto a bath and its application to bouncing droplets , \ 10.1017/jfm.2017.424 journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ vol...

    2017 doi

  21. [29]

    author author C. A. \ Galeano-Rios , author M. M. P. \ Couchman , author P. Caldairou , \ and\ author J. W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Ratcheting droplet pairs , \ 10.1063/1.5032116 journal journal Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science \ volume 28 ,\ pages 096...

    doi

  22. [30]

    \ Oza , author Rodolfo R

    author author Anand U. \ Oza , author Rodolfo R. \ Rosales , \ and\ author John W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title A trajectory equation for walking droplets: hydrodynamic pilot-wave theory , \ 10.1017/jfm.2013.581 journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 737 ,\ pages 552-...

    2013 doi

  23. [31]

    author author Matthew \ Durey \ and\ author John W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Classical pilot-wave dynamics: The free particle , \ 10.1063/5.0039975 journal journal Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science \ volume 31 ,\ pages 033136 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  24. [32]

    \ Oza , author Daniel M

    author author Anand U. \ Oza , author Daniel M. \ Harris , author Rodolfo R. \ Rosales , \ and\ author John W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Pilot-wave dynamics in a rotating frame: on the emergence of orbital quantization , \ 10.1017/jfm.2014.50 journal journal Journal of Fluid Me...

    doi

  25. [33]

    author author Nicholas \ Liu , author Matthew \ Durey , \ and\ author John W.M. \ Bush ,\ title title Pilot-wave dynamics in a rotating frame: the onset of orbital instability , \ 10.1017/jfm.2023.742 journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 973 ,\ pages A4 ( year 2...

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    Labousse , author A

    author author M. Labousse , author A. U. \ Oza , author S. Perrard , \ and\ author J. W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Pilot-wave dynamics in a harmonic potential: Quantization and stability of circular orbits , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.033122 journal journal Physical Review E \ volum...

    doi

  27. [35]

    \ Turton , \ and\ author John W

    author author Matthew \ Durey , author Sam E. \ Turton , \ and\ author John W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Speed oscillations in classical pilot-wave dynamics , \ 10.1098/rspa.2019.0884 journal journal Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sci...

    2019

  28. [36]

    \ Oza , author Emmanuel \ Siéfert , author Daniel M

    author author Anand U. \ Oza , author Emmanuel \ Siéfert , author Daniel M. \ Harris , author Jan \ Moláček , \ and\ author John W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Orbiting pairs of walking droplets: Dynamics and stability , \ 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.053601 journal journal Physical R...

    doi

  29. [37]

    \ Oza , \ and\ author John W

    author author Juncal \ Arbelaiz , author Anand U. \ Oza , \ and\ author John W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Promenading pairs of walking droplets: Dynamics and stability , \ 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.013604 journal journal Physical Review Fluids \ volume 3 ,\ pages 013604 ( year 20...

    doi

  30. [38]

    author author Miles M. P. \ Couchman , author Sam E. \ Turton , \ and\ author John W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Bouncing phase variations in pilot-wave hydrodynamics and the stability of droplet pairs , \ 10.1017/jfm.2019.293 journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume ...

    2019 doi

  31. [39]

    author author Miles M. P. \ Couchman \ and\ author John W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Free rings of bouncing droplets: stability and dynamics , \ 10.1017/jfm.2020.648 journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 903 ,\ pages A49 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  32. [40]

    author author Matthew \ Durey , author Paul A. \ Milewski , \ and\ author Zhan \ Wang ,\ title title Faraday pilot-wave dynamics in a circular corral , \ 10.1017/jfm.2020.140 journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 891 ,\ pages A3 ( year 2020 b ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  33. [41]

    \ Harris , \ and\ author John W

    author author Oistein \ Wind-Willassen , author Jan \ Moláček , author Daniel M. \ Harris , \ and\ author John W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Exotic states of bouncing and walking droplets , \ 10.1063/1.4817612 journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 25 ,\ pages 082002 ( year ...

    doi

  34. [42]

    Perrard , author E

    author author S. Perrard , author E. Fort , \ and\ author Y. Couder ,\ title title Wave- Based Turing Machine : Time Reversal and Information Erasing , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.094502 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 117 ,\ pages 094502 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi

  35. [43]

    author author L. D. \ Tambasco , author J. J. \ Pilgram , \ and\ author J. W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Bouncing droplet dynamics above the Faraday threshold , \ 10.1063/1.5031426 journal journal Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science \ volume 28 ,\ pages 0961...

    doi

  36. [44]

    \ Sáenz , \ and\ author John W

    author author Tudor \ Cristea-Platon , author Pedro J. \ Sáenz , \ and\ author John W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Walking droplets in a circular corral: Quantisation and chaos , \ 10.1063/1.5034123 journal journal Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science \ volume...

    doi

  37. [45]

    author author Matthew \ Durey \ and\ author Paul A. \ Milewski ,\ title title Faraday wave–droplet dynamics: discrete-time analysis , \ 10.1017/jfm.2017.235 journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 821 ,\ pages 296--329 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  38. [46]

    \ Tambasco \ and\ author John W

    author author Lucas D. \ Tambasco \ and\ author John W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Exploring orbital dynamics and trapping with a generalized pilot-wave framework , \ 10.1063/1.5033962 journal journal Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science \ volume 28 ,\ pages ...

    doi

  39. [47]

    author author B. K. \ Primkulov , author V. Frumkin , author D.J. \ Evans , author P.J. \ Saenz , \ and\ author J. W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Diffraction by a standing wave in pilot-wave hydrodynamics , \ @noop journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  40. [48]

    \ Harris \ and\ author John W

    author author Daniel M. \ Harris \ and\ author John W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Droplets walking in a rotating frame: from quantized orbits to multimodal statistics , \ 10.1017/JFM.2013.627 journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 739 ,\ pages 444--464 ( year 2014 )...

    2013 doi

  41. [49]

    \ Oza , author Øistein \ Wind-Willassen , author Daniel M

    author author Anand U. \ Oza , author Øistein \ Wind-Willassen , author Daniel M. \ Harris , author Rodolfo R. \ Rosales , \ and\ author John W. M. \ Bush ,\ title title Pilot-wave hydrodynamics in a rotating frame: Exotic orbits , \ 10.1063/1.4891568 journal journal Physics o...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.