pith. sign in

arxiv: 1610.03209 · v4 · pith:OEMUP7BYnew · submitted 2016-10-11 · 🧮 math.FA

Various notions of best approximation property in spaces of Bochner integrable functions

classification 🧮 math.FA
keywords proximinalballstronglysubspaceinftyspaceclosedproperty
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We derive that for a separable proximinal subspace $Y$ of $X$, $Y$ is strongly proximinal (strongly ball proximinal) if and only if for $1\leq p< \infty$, $L_p(I,Y)$ is strongly proximinal (strongly ball proximinal) in $L_p(I,X)$. Case for $p=\infty$ follows from stronger assumption on $Y$ in $X$ (uniform proximinality). It is observed that for a separable proximinal subspace $Y$ in $X$, $Y$ is ball proximinal in $X$ if and only if $L_p(I,Y)$ is ball proximinal in $L_p(I,X)$ for $1\leq p\leq\infty$. Our observations also include the fact that for any (strongly) proximinal subspace $Y$ of $X$, if every separable subspace of $Y$ is ball (strongly) proximinal in $X$ then $L_p(I,Y)$ is ball (strongly) proximinal in $L_p(I,X)$ for $1\leq p<\infty$. We introduce the notion of uniform proximinality of a closed convex set in a Banach space, which is wrongly defined in \cite{LZ}. Several examples are given having this property, viz. any $U$-subspace of a Banach space, closed unit ball $B_X$ of a space with $3.2.I.P$, closed unit ball of any M-ideal of a space with $3.2.I.P.$ are uniformly proximinal. A new class of examples are given having this property.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.