Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 104 references

Geospatial sustainability assessment of universal Fiber-To-The-Neighborhood (FTTnb) broadband infrastructure strategies for Sub-Saharan Africa

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Fiber broadband is viable for 550 million Sub-Saharan Africans

desk verdict The first FTTnb cost/emissions assessment for SSA has a solid qualitative story and reusable code, but the 48% headline is arithmetically inconsistent with its own Table 3, and the adoption rate is missing. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18633 v1 pith:OFMVXXJT submitted 2024-11-14 cs.NI

Ogutu B. Osoro , Edward J. Oughton , Fabion Kauker This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.NI
keywords Fiber-to-the-NeighborhoodSub-SaharanAfricabroadbandviabilityspatialoptimizationSteinertreelifecycleassessmentcarbonemissionstotalcostofownership
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish where, and at what cost and carbon price, Fiber-To-The-Neighborhood (FTTnb) broadband can be viably built across Sub-Saharan Africa. It combines population-density geotypes with two least-cost network routing algorithms to produce per-user total cost of ownership, life-cycle greenhouse-gas emissions, and social carbon cost estimates for 44 countries. The central result is that 48% of the regional population, about 550 million people, lives in areas where FTTnb is economically viable within ten years, while the remaining 52% would require subsidies or alternative technologies. This matters because fixed fiber is the future-proof backbone for wireless access, and investment decisions currently lack sub-national cost and emissions evidence.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a pair of Steiner-tree routing algorithms: Prim's Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) and the Prize-Collecting Steiner Tree (PCST). These choose the least-cost set of fiber links between population settlements along road networks (PCST) or direct Euclidean lines (MST), and the resulting route distances feed the total-cost-of-ownership and life-cycle-assessment equations that produce all per-user cost, emission, and social-carbon results.

What would settle it

Recompute the model for the entire region with a stated adoption rate, for example 1%, and compare the resulting per-user TCO and emissions for Decile 1 and Decile 10 with the paper's reported figures; if the numbers change by more than the paper's Monte Carlo range, the unstated adoption rate is the controlling factor. A direct field test is to collect actual per-household fiber connection costs from one rural SSA operator and compare them with the predicted US$33-36 per user in Decile 10.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper finds that building FTTnb in sparsely populated areas (below 9 people per square kilometer) costs 12-90 times more per user and emits 12-90 times more CO2 equivalent per user annually than in areas above 958 people per square kilometer, with the exact multiplier depending on the routing algorithm. Across the region, total investment is about US$25-26 billion, or 1.2-1.3% of SSA's annual GDP. Because only the first five population deciles (above roughly 106 people per square kilometer) can be connected at reasonable per-user total cost of ownership, the authors conclude that about 550 million people, 48% of the total population, can be viably served by FTTnb within the next ten years.

Load-bearing premise

The per-user cost, emission, and social-carbon figures all multiply population density by an adoption rate whose value the paper never states, so every per-user number depends on an unstated take-up percentage.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Building FTTnb only in the first five population deciles (above roughly 106 people per square kilometer) would reach about 550 million people for roughly US$25-26 billion, about 1.2-1.3% of SSA's annual GDP.
  • Per-user costs and emissions rise steeply below about 106 people per square kilometer, so operators and governments should prioritize fiber push into towns and dense rural clusters before considering sparse regions.
  • In sparsely populated areas (below 9 people per square kilometer), per-user emissions are 12-90 times higher with MST and 49-80 times higher with PCST than in areas above 958 people per square kilometer, implying a much higher carbon price per rural connection.
  • The social carbon cost of rural FTTnb deployment is 12-93 times higher per user (MST) and 49-85 times higher (PCST) than urban deployment, so environmental cost should be part of subsidy decisions.
  • The choice of routing algorithm materially changes viability estimates: PCST routes along real roads and skips some nodes, yielding longer routes and higher emissions than MST.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The unstated adoption rate is the single most sensitive parameter for the per-user metrics; publishing a value or a sensitivity sweep would let planners convert population into expected connections and re-benchmark the 550-million figure.
  • The same modeling chain—geotype demand, Steiner routing, and life-cycle assessment—could be re-run for other low-income regions such as South Asia or Central America to produce comparable universal-broadband viability maps.
  • The 48% viability estimate likely depends on the 20,000-person settlement threshold; lowering that threshold to include smaller towns would raise the viable population share but also raise costs, so a threshold sensitivity analysis would test robustness.
  • Because FTTnb stops at the neighborhood, the last-mile wireless access costs and emissions are excluded; including them could change which geotypes are truly affordable and shift the viability boundary.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents a geospatial techno-economic and life-cycle assessment of Fiber-To-The-Neighborhood (FTTnb) deployment across 44 Sub-Saharan African countries. The authors combine WorldPop population data, existing fiber maps, road networks, and two spatial optimization algorithms (Minimum Spanning Tree Prim and Prize Collecting Steiner Tree) to compute total cost of ownership, greenhouse gas emissions, and social carbon cost per user across ten population-density deciles. The headline finding is that FTTnb is viable for 48% (about 550 million people) of the Sub-Saharan African population within ten years, with per-user emissions and costs far higher in sparsely populated regions. The paper also reports aggregate investment costs of US$25-26 billion and compares them to SSA GDP.

Significance. If the quantitative claims held, the paper would be a useful first-order benchmark for broadband infrastructure planning in Sub-Saharan Africa, and the integrated treatment of cost, emissions, and social carbon cost across granular geotypes is a genuine contribution. The authors make their code and data available, and they explicitly compare an idealized MST design with a road-constrained PCST design, which is a reasonable way to bracket network costs. However, the central viability figure is internally inconsistent with the paper's own table, and key parameters (notably the adoption rate) are not reported, so the headline numbers are not currently reproducible. The qualitative relationship between population density and per-user cost/emissions is structurally sound and likely robust, but the specific quantitative conclusions need substantial revision.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; §VI Conclusion; Table 3] The paper's central claim that 48% (about 550 million) of the SSA population can be viably served is arithmetically inconsistent with Table 3. The cumulative population of Deciles 1-4 is 553,543,408 (47.9% of 1,154,766,136), while Deciles 1-5 sum to 688,034,765 (59.6%). The text in §V says the approach is unviable below 106 people/km2 (Decile 6-10) and the conclusion says Decile 1-5 are viable. Since Decile 5 has a minimum density of 107 people/km2, the stated threshold includes Decile 5, which would imply roughly 688 million (60%), not 550 million (48%). The 550 million figure corresponds to Deciles 1-4, contradicting the 106 people/km2 threshold. The abstract, conclusion, and discussion must be reconciled; as written, the paper's strongest quantitative claim is not internally consistent.
  2. [§III(a), Eq. (2); Table 1] Eq. (2) defines Userskm2 = Pop(km2) × ADr, and all per-user TCO, emissions, and SCC results are derived by dividing network totals by this quantity. However, the paper never states the value of ADr used in the scenarios. Table 1 lists the main settlement population, fiber node buffer, and many cost parameters, but no adoption rate. The only clue is an example ("an adoption rate of 0.5%") and a statement that "the model is set to different adoption rates," without specifying the actual values. Because every per-user figure (e.g., US$0.29 vs. US$36 annualized TCO; 0.18-9.6 kg CO2 eq./user) scales linearly with 1/ADr, the results are unverifiable and could change by orders of magnitude under a different take-up assumption. The authors must state the adoption rate(s) and, ideally, provide a sensitivity analysis.
  3. [§IV, 'Fiber design', Fig. 8-9; §III(b)] The MST Prim results are presented as a primary least-cost design, but the text concedes that "the distance connecting the nodes is not necessarily realistic as the algorithm calculates the Euclidean distance between the nodes." Unlike the PCST design, which uses road data from Overture, the MST design connects nodes by straight lines that ignore terrain, existing roads, and right-of-way constraints, systematically underestimating fiber length, trenching, cost, and emissions. The headline ranges in the abstract combine MST and PCST values (e.g., 0.18-9.6 kg CO2 eq./user), so the lower bounds are unrealistic. The authors should either restrict headline claims to the road-constrained PCST results or explicitly report MST as an idealized lower bound with appropriate caveats, rather than treating it as a realistic least-cost design.
  4. [§V, Research Question 2; §VI Conclusion] The term "viable" is never defined by an explicit economic or environmental criterion. The paper labels populations in high-density deciles as viable and low-density deciles as unviable, but this is essentially a restatement of the population-density classification: settlements above the 20,000 main-settlement threshold are connected, and the resulting high-density deciles are then called viable. No benchmark (e.g., TCO per user relative to GDP per capita, a monthly affordability threshold, a payback period, or a maximum allowable SCC) is applied. Consequently, the 48%/60% viability conclusion is circular with respect to the chosen deciles and does not follow from the cost and emissions calculations themselves. The authors should define a transparent viability threshold and apply it to the computed TCO and emissions per user.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§IV(b), Emission Results] The reported MST Decile 1 annualized regional emissions are given as 0.0015 kg CO2 eq./user in the text, while the abstract and conclusion cite 0.015 kg CO2 eq./user; please clarify which value is correct.
  2. [Table 1] Table 1 lists "Fiber node buffer km 2" with value "2" but the unit is ambiguous; the text says a two-kilometer buffer, so the row should read "km" or "km²" as appropriate.
  3. [§V, Research Question 2] The sentence "This variance justifies the rational need for operators to build FTTnb to the most populated areas first" is awkward and should be reworded.
  4. [§VI Conclusion] In the Conclusion, "covering ~550 million people" conflicts with Table 3; after fixing the arithmetic, update this number consistently throughout the abstract, discussion, and conclusion.
  5. [§III(e), Table 1] Reference [46] is cited for the 20,000 settlement threshold and several cost parameters; given its central role, consider adding a brief description of how these values were transferred to the Sub-Saharan African context.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The 48% viability headline restates the density-decile bins rather than being derived from the TCO/emissions model, so the central claim is partially circular.

  1. self definitional [Section III.a (Demand Model), Section VI (Conclusion), Table 3]
    "First, only areas with population above a set population density threshold (Popmin) are identified since it will be necessary to connect remote areas via satellite (due to poor economic viability of terrestrial options). ... The key take-away is that despite taking a more modest approach than FTTP, providing fiber broadband through FTTnb is not viable in many areas (52% of the total population), and likely only possible over the next decade in the first five population deciles (Decile 1-5), covering ~550 million people."

    Viability is never operationalized by an independent economic threshold (e.g., maximum acceptable TCO/user or SCC/user) applied to the modeled outputs. Instead, the demand model pre-classifies areas below a population-density threshold as economically unviable ('poor economic viability of terrestrial options'), and the conclusion then declares the first five density deciles viable, reading the headline population share off the same input bins. Table 3 shows Deciles 1-4 sum to 553,543,408 (47.9% of 1,154,766,136) while Deciles 1-5 sum to 688,034,765 (59.6%), so '48% / about 550 million' corresponds to Deciles 1-4, not the stated 'Decile 1-5'.

full rationale

The per-user cost and emission calculations are not circular: they are driven by independently sourced unit costs, LCA emission factors (Tables 1-2), and standard spatial optimization (MST/PCST), and the paper does not fit any parameter to the headline emission ratios (0.18-9.6 vs 0.015-0.12 kg CO2 eq./user). The 20,000 settlement threshold is taken from Oughton's prior work, but it is a stated parametric assumption rather than a self-supporting uniqueness claim, so it does not by itself create circularity. The unstated adoption rate ADr in Eq. (2) is a serious reproducibility problem, but it is not evidence of fitting-to-target. The circularity is concentrated in the abstract/conclusion viability claim: 'viable' is equated with the upper population-density deciles, and the 48%/550 million figure is read directly off those input decile bins (indeed, Table 3 gives 553.5M for Deciles 1-4 and 688.0M for Deciles 1-5, so the stated 'Decile 1-5 / 550 million' is internally inconsistent). Since the paper's strongest headline is this viability share, the central claim is partially circular even though the engineering and LCA submodels have independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on a large number of assumed inputs: population data, existing fiber maps, road data, cost parameters, emission factors, and modeling choices such as the settlement threshold, buffer distance, trenching percentage, and an adoption rate that is not even specified. These are almost all sourced from prior literature or chosen by hand, and the absence of a stated adoption rate is the most serious gap because it directly determines every per-user result.

free parameters (6)
  • Main settlement population threshold = 20,000 inhabitants
    Chosen in Section III.e and Table 1 (source [46]); determines which settlement nodes are included in the network design, directly affecting the 48% viability conclusion.
  • Fiber node buffer around existing network = 2 km
    Chosen in Section III.e; determines which settlements connect to the existing core fiber network without new long-haul fiber.
  • Trenching percentage = 1%
    Chosen in Section III.d (Table 2, source [100]); the fraction of fiber route placed underground, with the rest assumed to use aerial/power-line deployment; construction emissions scale with this.
  • Adoption rate (ADr) = Not specified in the paper
    Equation (2) uses ADr to convert population to users, but the value is not given in Table 1 or the main text; per-user costs and emissions are inversely proportional to this rate, so its absence is load-bearing.
  • Discount rate = 8.33%
    From Table 1 (source [90]); used to annualize TCO over 30 years.
  • Social cost of carbon = US$75 per tonne CO2 at 2.5% discount
    From Table 1 (source [87]); converts emissions to SCC.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption WorldPop 2020 population mosaic accurately represents the spatial distribution of population in Sub-Saharan Africa.
    Used in Section III.e as the demand driver; errors propagate to all per-user results.
  • domain assumption AfterFibre data is a complete representation of existing core fiber networks in SSA.
    Section III.e; the network model connects settlements to this existing fiber, so missing links would change routing and costs.
  • domain assumption Overture road data from February 2024 provides a realistic routing path for fiber deployment.
    Used for PCST routing; incomplete road data would underestimate fiber lengths and costs.
  • domain assumption LCA emission factors from literature (e.g., UK DBEIS, New Zealand study) apply to SSA manufacturing, transportation, and recycling.
    Section III.d and Table 2; regional differences in energy grids and supply chains would change emissions.
  • domain assumption Excluding raw material extraction emissions from the LCA system boundary is acceptable.
    Acknowledged in Section VI as a limitation; the paper says raw material acquisition is 'implicitly included' in emission factors.
  • ad hoc to paper A population density threshold (deciles) is a valid way to summarize network viability.
    The 48% viability claim restates the decile grouping; no explicit cost-based viability threshold is given.
  • ad hoc to paper MST with Euclidean distances is a meaningful network design despite not following roads.
    The paper acknowledges this is unrealistic (Section IV), yet uses it as one of the two headline algorithms.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Geospatial sustainability assessment of universal Fiber-To-The-Neighborhood (FTTnb) broadband infrastructure strategies for Sub-Saharan Africa." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OFMVXXJT

@misc{pith2026241118633,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Geospatial sustainability assessment of universal Fiber-To-The-Neighborhood (FTTnb) broadband infrastructure strategies for Sub-Saharan Africa},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OFMVXXJT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18633}
}
read the original abstract

Broadband Internet access is an important way to help achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Currently, fixed fiber infrastructure is essential for providing universal broadband, but has received relatively little research attention in low-income countries compared to other more cost-efficient wireless technologies. Yet, pushing out fiber broadband network to local areas is essential, even if the final access network is still wireless. Here, we design least-cost Fiber-To-The-Neighborhood (FTTnb) architectures using two spatial optimization Steiner Tree algorithms to jointly determine investment costs, environmental emissions, and Social Carbon Costs. We find that the average annualized per user emissions in low population density areas (<9 people per km2) range from 0.18-9.6 kg CO2 eq./user, compared to 0.015-0.12 kg CO2 eq./user for high population density areas (>958 people per km2). Moreover, Annualized Total Cost of Ownership per user is 12-90 times lower in high population density areas (>958 people per km2) compared to sparsely populated regions (<9 people per km2). Thus, 48% (about 550 million) of the total Sub-Saharan African population live in areas where FTTnb is viable within the next ten years.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Population of global offline continues steady decline to 2.6 billion people in 2023,

    International Telecommunication Union, “Population of global offline continues steady decline to 2.6 billion people in 2023,” ITU. Accessed: Sep. 19, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.itu.int:443/en/mediacentre/Pages/PR-2023-09-12-universal-and-meaningful- connectivity-by-2030.aspx

    2023

  2. [2]

    Connecting the other half: Exploring options for the 50% of the population unconnected to the internet,

    I. del Portillo, S. Eiskowitz, E. F. Crawley, and B. G. Cameron, “Connecting the other half: Exploring options for the 50% of the population unconnected to the internet,” Telecommun. Policy, vol. 45, no. 3, p. 102092, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102092

    arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    Tackling Africa’s digital divide,

    M. P. J. Lavery et al., “Tackling Africa’s digital divide,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 12, no. 5, Art. no. 5, May 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41566-018-0162-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-018-0162-z 2018

  4. [4]

    The Macroeconomic Impacts of Digitalization in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Submarine Cables,

    F. F. S. Li Yiruo, “The Macroeconomic Impacts of Digitalization in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Submarine Cables,” IMF. Accessed: Oct. 06, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2021/04/29/The-Macroeconomic-Impacts- of-Digitalization-in-Sub-Saharan-Africa-Evidence-from-Submarine-50337

    2023

  5. [5]

    DATA | Glo 4G LTE Network - Experience High Speed 4G Mobile Internet,

    “DATA | Glo 4G LTE Network - Experience High Speed 4G Mobile Internet,” GloWorld. Accessed: Sep. 26, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://www.gloworld.com/ng/personal/data/data-plans

    2023

  6. [6]

    Internet bundles – MTN Zambia

    “Internet bundles – MTN Zambia.” Accessed: Sep. 26, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mtn.zm/product/internet-bundles/

    2023

  7. [7]

    How to get Dataplan of airtel from dr congo,

    “How to get Dataplan of airtel from dr congo,” Timbu. Accessed: Sep. 26, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://timbu.com/dr-congo/networks/airtel/timbu.com/dr congo/networks/airtel/dataplan

    2023

  8. [8]

    Safaricom Data Bundles

    “Safaricom Data Bundles.” Accessed: Sep. 26, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.safaricom.co.ke/media-center-landing/frequently-asked-questions/safaricom- data-bundles

    2023

Show all 104 references
  1. [9]

    Policy options for broadband infrastructure strategies: A simulation model for affordable universal broadband in Africa,

    E. J. Oughton, “Policy options for broadband infrastructure strategies: A simulation model for affordable universal broadband in Africa,” Telemat. Inform., vol. 76, p. 101908, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2022.101908

    2023

  2. [10]

    The tax burden on mobile network operators in Africa,

    G. Rota-Graziosi and F. Sawadogo, “The tax burden on mobile network operators in Africa,” Telecommun. Policy, vol. 46, no. 5, p. 102293, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102293

    2022

  3. [11]

    Definitive Data and Analysis for the Mobile Industry,

    GSMA Intelligence, “Definitive Data and Analysis for the Mobile Industry,” GSMA Intelligence. Accessed: Sep. 26, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.gsmaintelligence.com/data/

    2023

  4. [12]

    Inflation: Prices on the Rise,

    C. Oner, “Inflation: Prices on the Rise,” IMF. Accessed: Nov. 22, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/Series/Back-to-Basics/Inflation

    2023

  5. [13]

    Rural Population (% of total population),

    The World Bank, “Rural Population (% of total population),” World Bank Open Data. Accessed: Sep. 26, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://data.worldbank.org

    2023

  6. [14]

    Radio over Fiber: An Alternative Broadband Network Technology for IoT,

    D. F. Paredes-Páliz, G. Royo, F. Aznar, C. Aldea, and S. Celma, “Radio over Fiber: An Alternative Broadband Network Technology for IoT,” Electronics, vol. 9, no. 11, Art. no. 11, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.3390/electronics9111785

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    A retrospective study on the regional benefits and spillover effects of high-speed broadband networks: Evidence from German counties,

    W. Briglauer, N. Dürr, and K. Gugler, “A retrospective study on the regional benefits and spillover effects of high-speed broadband networks: Evidence from German counties,” Int. J. Ind. Organ., vol. 74, p. 102677, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2020.102677. Osoro, Oughton...

    2021

  8. [16]

    Towards a low-cost sustainable broadband solution in rural areas of low and middle-income countries: Tanzania’s backhaul perspective,

    S. R. Kalula, A. M. Dida, and Y . O. Zaipuna, “Towards a low-cost sustainable broadband solution in rural areas of low and middle-income countries: Tanzania’s backhaul perspective,” Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol., vol. 16, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.4314/ijest.v16i1.3

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    On Integrated Access and Backhaul Networks: Current Status and Potentials,

    C. Madapatha et al., “On Integrated Access and Backhaul Networks: Current Status and Potentials,” IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc., vol. 1, pp. 1374–1389, 2020, doi: 10.1109/OJCOMS.2020.3022529

    2020

  10. [18]

    Review of optical and wireless backhaul networks and emerging trends of next generation 5G and 6G technologies,

    T. Sharma, A. Chehri, and P. Fortier, “Review of optical and wireless backhaul networks and emerging trends of next generation 5G and 6G technologies,” Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol., vol. 32, no. 3, p. e4155, 2021, doi: 10.1002/ett.4155

    2021 doi

  11. [19]

    Integrated Wireless-Optical Backhaul and Fronthaul Provision Through Multicore Fiber,

    L. G. Guerrero et al., “Integrated Wireless-Optical Backhaul and Fronthaul Provision Through Multicore Fiber,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 146915–146922, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3014702

    2020

  12. [20]

    The 5G Guide: A Reference for Operators,

    GSMA, “The 5G Guide: A Reference for Operators,” London, Public Policy, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.gsma.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/The-5G- Guide_GSMA_2019_04_29_compressed.pdf

    2019

  13. [21]

    Infrastructure Sharing Strategies for Wireless Broadband,

    S. K. A. Kumar and E. J. Oughton, “Infrastructure Sharing Strategies for Wireless Broadband,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 46–52, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.005.2200698

    2023 doi

  14. [22]

    Techno-economic assessment of 5G infrastructure sharing business models in rural areas,

    S. Koratagere Anantha Kumar and E. J. Oughton, “Techno-economic assessment of 5G infrastructure sharing business models in rural areas,” Front. Comput. Sci., vol. 5, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2023.1191853

    2023

  15. [23]

    Improving the accuracy of electricity carbon footprint: Estimation of hydroelectric reservoir greenhouse gas emissions,

    A. Levasseur, S. Mercier-Blais, Y . T. Prairie, A. Tremblay, and C. Turpin, “Improving the accuracy of electricity carbon footprint: Estimation of hydroelectric reservoir greenhouse gas emissions,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 136, p. 110433, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.rse...

    2021

  16. [24]

    Prediction of the effects of climate change on hydroelectric generation, electricity demand, and emissions of greenhouse gases under climatic scenarios and optimized ANN model,

    L.-N. Guo et al., “Prediction of the effects of climate change on hydroelectric generation, electricity demand, and emissions of greenhouse gases under climatic scenarios and optimized ANN model,” Energy Rep., vol. 7, pp. 5431–5445, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.08.134

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    Sustainability assessment of 4G and 5G universal mobile broadband strategies,

    E. J. Oughton, J. Oh, S. Ballan, and J. Kusuma, “Sustainability assessment of 4G and 5G universal mobile broadband strategies,” Nov. 09, 2023, arXiv: arXiv:2311.05480. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2311.05480

    2023 doi arXiv

  18. [26]

    A review of the effectiveness of Life Cycle Assessment for gauging environmental impacts from cement production,

    O. E. Ige, O. A. Olanrewaju, K. J. Duffy, and C. Obiora, “A review of the effectiveness of Life Cycle Assessment for gauging environmental impacts from cement production,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 324, p. 129213, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129213

    2021

  19. [27]

    Assessing the environmental impact of an integrated steel mill with post- combustion CO2 capture and storage using the LCA methodology,

    D.-A. Chisalita, L. Petrescu, P. Cobden, H. A. J. (Eric) van Dijk, A.-M. Cormos, and C.-C. Cormos, “Assessing the environmental impact of an integrated steel mill with post- combustion CO2 capture and storage using the LCA methodology,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 211, pp. 1015–1025...

    2019 doi

  20. [28]

    Cooperative reliability allocation in network flow problems considering greenhouse gas emissions: Optical fiber networks structure,

    M. Mehryar, A. Hafezalkotob, A. Azizi, and F. M. Sobhani, “Cooperative reliability allocation in network flow problems considering greenhouse gas emissions: Optical fiber networks structure,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 326, p. 129315, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129315. ...

    2021

  21. [29]

    The cost-effectiveness of fibre optic technology deployment in rural area: a case study of Mdantsane,

    O. Oki and M. O. Lawrence, “The cost-effectiveness of fibre optic technology deployment in rural area: a case study of Mdantsane,” J. Innov. Sustain. RISUS, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 111– 123, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.23925/2179-3565.2022v13i2p111-123

    2022

  22. [30]

    Fibre-to- the-Hut Technology: A solution for Cheap Access for High Speed-Optical Network in South Africa,

    G. M. Isoe, E. K. Rotich, R. R. G. Gamatham, A. W. R. Leitch, and T. B. Gibbon, “Fibre-to- the-Hut Technology: A solution for Cheap Access for High Speed-Optical Network in South Africa,” Proc 60th Annu. Conf. South Afr. Inst. Phys.-Port Elizab., pp. 440–444, 2015

    2015

  23. [31]

    Point-to-point overlay of a 100Gb/s DP-QPSK channel in LR-PONs for urban and rural areas,

    S. Porto et al., “Point-to-point overlay of a 100Gb/s DP-QPSK channel in LR-PONs for urban and rural areas,” Opt. Express, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 3303–3319, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1364/OE.26.003303

    2018 doi

  24. [32]

    A cost study of fixed broadband access networks for rural areas,

    J. Rendon Schneir and Y . Xiong, “A cost study of fixed broadband access networks for rural areas,” Telecommun. Policy, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 755–773, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2016.04.002

    2016 doi

  25. [33]

    Go for Gigabit? First Evidence on Economic Benefits of High-speed Broadband Technologies in Europe,

    W. Briglauer and K. Gugler, “Go for Gigabit? First Evidence on Economic Benefits of High-speed Broadband Technologies in Europe,” JCMS J. Common Mark. Stud., vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1071–1090, 2019, doi: 10.1111/jcms.12872

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    The broadband digital divide and the economic benefits of mobile broadband for rural areas,

    J. E. Prieger, “The broadband digital divide and the economic benefits of mobile broadband for rural areas,” Telecommun. Policy, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 483–502, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2012.11.003

    2013 doi

  27. [35]

    Crowdsourced data indicates broadband has a positive impact on local business creation,

    Y . P. Chen, E. J. Oughton, J. Zagdanski, M. M. Jia, and P. Tyler, “Crowdsourced data indicates broadband has a positive impact on local business creation,” Telemat. Inform., vol. 84, p. 102035, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2023.102035

    2023

  28. [36]

    Bashir, Connecting Africa’ s Universities to Affordable High-Speed Broadband Internet: What Will it Take? World Bank, 2020

    S. Bashir, Connecting Africa’ s Universities to Affordable High-Speed Broadband Internet: What Will it Take? World Bank, 2020. doi: 10.1596/34955

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    Exploring geographic disparities in broadband access and use in rural southern Illinois: Who’s being left behind?,

    T. J. Oyana, “Exploring geographic disparities in broadband access and use in rural southern Illinois: Who’s being left behind?,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 252–261, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.09.003

    2011 doi

  30. [38]

    How is mobile broadband intensity affecting CO2 emissions? – A macro analysis,

    H. Edquist and P. Bergmark, “How is mobile broadband intensity affecting CO2 emissions? – A macro analysis,” Telecommun. Policy, vol. 48, no. 2, p. 102668, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102668

    2024

  31. [39]

    The greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction potential of ICT: A critical review of telecommunication companies’ GHG enablement assessments,

    J. C. T. Bieser, V . C. Coroamă, P. Bergmark, and M. Stürmer, “The greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction potential of ICT: A critical review of telecommunication companies’ GHG enablement assessments,” J. Ind. Ecol., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1132–1146, 2024, doi: 10.1111/jiec.13524

    2024 doi

  32. [40]

    ICT sector electricity consumption and greenhouse gas emissions – 2020 outcome,

    J. Malmodin, N. Lövehagen, P. Bergmark, and D. Lundén, “ICT sector electricity consumption and greenhouse gas emissions – 2020 outcome,” Telecommun. Policy, p. 102701, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102701

    2020

  33. [41]

    Electricity Consumption and Operational Carbon Emissions of European Telecom Network Operators,

    D. Lundén, J. Malmodin, P. Bergmark, and N. Lövehagen, “Electricity Consumption and Operational Carbon Emissions of European Telecom Network Operators,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 2637, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14052637

    2022 doi

  34. [42]

    Could information and communication technology (ICT) reduce carbon emissions? The role of trade openness and financial development,

    Q. Wang, S. Hu, and R. Li, “Could information and communication technology (ICT) reduce carbon emissions? The role of trade openness and financial development,” Telecommun. Policy, vol. 48, no. 3, p. 102699, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102699

    2024

  35. [43]

    What would it cost to connect the unconnected? Estimating global universal broadband infrastructure investment,

    E. J. Oughton, D. Amaglobeli, and M. Moszoro, “What would it cost to connect the unconnected? Estimating global universal broadband infrastructure investment,” Osoro, Oughton & Kauker 32 Telecommun. Policy, vol. 47, no. 10, p. 102670, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102670

    2023

  36. [44]

    Exploring the feasibility of rural broadband cooperatives in the United States: The new New Deal?,

    T. M. Schmit and R. M. Severson, “Exploring the feasibility of rural broadband cooperatives in the United States: The new New Deal?,” Telecommun. Policy, vol. 45, no. 4, p. 102114, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102114

    2021

  37. [45]

    5G: A new future for Mobile Network Operators, or not?,

    W. Lehr, F. Queder, and J. Haucap, “5G: A new future for Mobile Network Operators, or not?,” Telecommun. Policy, vol. 45, no. 3, p. 102086, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102086

    2021

  38. [46]

    Policy choices can help keep 4G and 5G universal broadband affordable,

    E. J. Oughton, N. Comini, V . Foster, and J. W. Hall, “Policy choices can help keep 4G and 5G universal broadband affordable,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 176, p. 121409, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121409

    2022

  39. [47]

    A Techno-Economic Framework for Installing Broadband Networks in Rural and Remote Areas,

    M. A. D. Souza et al., “A Techno-Economic Framework for Installing Broadband Networks in Rural and Remote Areas,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 58421–58447, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3071919

    2021

  40. [48]

    Rural broadband: Gaps, maps and challenges,

    H. Hambly and R. Rajabiun, “Rural broadband: Gaps, maps and challenges,” Telemat. Inform., vol. 60, p. 101565, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2021.101565

    2021

  41. [49]

    Estimating the deployment costs of broadband universal service via fiber networks in Korea,

    H. Lee, S. Jeong, and K. Lee, “Estimating the deployment costs of broadband universal service via fiber networks in Korea,” Telecommun. Policy, vol. 45, no. 4, p. 102105, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102105

    2021

  42. [50]

    Comparative techno-economic evaluation of LTE fixed wireless access, FTTdp G.fast and FTTC VDSL network deployment for providing 30 Mbps broadband services in rural areas,

    N. Ioannou, D. Katsianis, and D. Varoutas, “Comparative techno-economic evaluation of LTE fixed wireless access, FTTdp G.fast and FTTC VDSL network deployment for providing 30 Mbps broadband services in rural areas,” Telecommun. Policy, vol. 44, no. 3, p. 101875, Apr. 2020, do...

    2020

  43. [51]

    Overcoming economic challenges of internet operators in low income regions through a delay tolerant architecture with mechanic backhauls,

    L. Marentes, T. Wolf, A. Nagurney, Y . Donoso, and H. Castro, “Overcoming economic challenges of internet operators in low income regions through a delay tolerant architecture with mechanic backhauls,” NETNOMICS Econ. Res. Electron. Netw., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 183–213, Nov. 201...

    2014 doi

  44. [52]

    A Pricing-Based Rate Allocation Game in TVWS Backhaul and Access Link for Rural Broadband,

    S. Ghosh, S. Karar, and A. D. Barman, “A Pricing-Based Rate Allocation Game in TVWS Backhaul and Access Link for Rural Broadband,” IEEE Syst. J., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 511–518, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2018.2842140

    2019

  45. [54]

    Reviewing wireless broadband technologies in the peak smartphone era: 6G versus Wi-Fi 7 and 8,

    E. Oughton, G. Geraci, M. Polese, V . Shah, D. Bubley, and S. Blue, “Reviewing wireless broadband technologies in the peak smartphone era: 6G versus Wi-Fi 7 and 8,” Telecommun. Policy, vol. 48, no. 6, p. 102766, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102766

    2024

  46. [55]

    Renewable energy powered sustainable 5G network infrastructure: Opportunities, challenges and perspectives,

    A. Israr, Q. Yang, W. Li, and A. Y . Zomaya, “Renewable energy powered sustainable 5G network infrastructure: Opportunities, challenges and perspectives,” J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 175, p. 102910, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102910

    2021

  47. [56]

    Intelligent Network Maintenance Modeling for Fixed Broadband Networks in Sustainable Smart Homes,

    M. Alipio and M. Bures, “Intelligent Network Maintenance Modeling for Fixed Broadband Networks in Sustainable Smart Homes,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 10, no. 20, pp. 18067–18081, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2023.3277590

    2023

  48. [57]

    Ahmed, S

    Z. Ahmed, S. P. Nathaniel, and M. Shahbaz, “The criticality of information and communication technology and human capital in environmental sustainability: Evidence Osoro, Oughton & Kauker 33 from Latin American and Caribbean countries,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 286, p. 125529, Ma...

    2021

  49. [58]

    Role of information and communication technologies and innovation in driving carbon emissions and economic growth in selected G-20 countries,

    T. T. Nguyen, T. A. T. Pham, and H. T. X. Tram, “Role of information and communication technologies and innovation in driving carbon emissions and economic growth in selected G-20 countries,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 261, p. 110162, May 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110162

    2020

  50. [59]

    Does information and communication technology affect CO2 mitigation under the pathway of sustainable development during the mode of globalization?,

    R. Ulucak, Danish, and S. U.-D. Khan, “Does information and communication technology affect CO2 mitigation under the pathway of sustainable development during the mode of globalization?,” Sustain. Dev., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 857–867, 2020, doi: 10.1002/sd.2041

    2020 doi

  51. [60]

    Can information and communication technology reduce CO2 emission? A quantile regression analysis,

    X. Chen, X. Gong, D. Li, and J. Zhang, “Can information and communication technology reduce CO2 emission? A quantile regression analysis,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 26, no. 32, pp. 32977–32992, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06380-8

    2019 doi

  52. [61]

    Effects of information and communication technology and real income on CO2 emissions: The experience of countries along Belt and Road,

    Danish, “Effects of information and communication technology and real income on CO2 emissions: The experience of countries along Belt and Road,” Telemat. Inform., vol. 45, no. C, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2019.101300

    2019

  53. [62]

    The effects of Internet usage and economic growth on CO2 emissions in OECD countries: A panel investigation,

    M. Salahuddin, K. Alam, and I. Ozturk, “The effects of Internet usage and economic growth on CO2 emissions in OECD countries: A panel investigation,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 62, pp. 1226–1235, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.018

    2016 doi

  54. [63]

    The effect of ICT on CO2 emissions in emerging economies: does the level of income matters?,

    Danish, N. Khan, M. A. Baloch, S. Saud, and T. Fatima, “The effect of ICT on CO2 emissions in emerging economies: does the level of income matters?,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 25, no. 23, pp. 22850–22860, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2379-2

    2018 doi

  55. [64]

    ICT, CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth: Evidence from a Panel of ASEAN,

    J. W. Lee and T. Brahmasrene, “ICT, CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth: Evidence from a Panel of ASEAN,” Glob. Econ. Rev., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 93–109, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1080/1226508X.2014.917803

    2014

  56. [65]

    Recalibrating global data center energy-use estimates,

    E. Masanet, A. Shehabi, N. Lei, S. Smith, and J. Koomey, “Recalibrating global data center energy-use estimates,” Science, vol. 367, no. 6481, pp. 984–986, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1126/science.aba3758

    2020 doi

  57. [66]

    Identifying bus stop redundancy: A gis-based spatial optimization approach,

    E. M. Delmelle, S. Li, and A. T. Murray, “Identifying bus stop redundancy: A gis-based spatial optimization approach,” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 445–455, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2012.01.002

    2012 doi

  58. [67]

    Ground segment architectures for large LEO constellations with feeder links in EHF-bands,

    I. del Portillo, B. Cameron, and E. Crawley, “Ground segment architectures for large LEO constellations with feeder links in EHF-bands,” in 2018 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Mar. 2018, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1109/AERO.2018.8396576

    2018

  59. [68]

    Fiber-broadband-internet and its regional impact—An empirical investigation,

    G. J. Klein, “Fiber-broadband-internet and its regional impact—An empirical investigation,” Telecommun. Policy, vol. 46, no. 5, p. 102331, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102331

    2022

  60. [69]

    Guest Editorial: Techno- Economic Analysis of Telecommunications Systems,

    J. R. Schneir, B. G. Mölleryd, E. Oughton, and C. Mas-Machuca, “Guest Editorial: Techno- Economic Analysis of Telecommunications Systems,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 26–27, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2024.10746256

    2024

  61. [70]

    Fiber optical network design problems: A case for Turkey,

    B. Yazar, O. Arslan, O. E. Karaşan, and B. Y . Kara, “Fiber optical network design problems: A case for Turkey,” Omega, vol. 63, pp. 23–40, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.10.001

    2016 doi

  62. [71]

    An improved least cost routing approach for WDM optical network without wavelength converters,

    L. H. Bonani and M. Forghani-elahabad, “An improved least cost routing approach for WDM optical network without wavelength converters,” Opt. Fiber Technol., vol. 32, pp. 30–35, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.yofte.2016.09.003. Osoro, Oughton & Kauker 34

    2016 doi

  63. [72]

    The generalized minimum spanning tree problem: An overview of formulations, solution procedures and latest advances,

    P. C. Pop, “The generalized minimum spanning tree problem: An overview of formulations, solution procedures and latest advances,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 283, no. 1, pp. 1–15, May 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.05.017

    2020 doi

  64. [73]

    Text document clustering using Spectral Clustering algorithm with Particle Swarm Optimization,

    R. Janani and S. Vijayarani, “Text document clustering using Spectral Clustering algorithm with Particle Swarm Optimization,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 134, pp. 192–200, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.05.030

    2019 doi

  65. [74]

    A new algorithm for finding minimum spanning trees with undirected neutrosophic graphs,

    A. Dey, S. Broumi, L. H. Son, A. Bakali, M. Talea, and F. Smarandache, “A new algorithm for finding minimum spanning trees with undirected neutrosophic graphs,” Granul. Comput., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 63–69, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s41066-018-0084-7

    2019 doi

  66. [75]

    Fibre is the most energy efficient broadband technology | Shaping Europe’s digital future,

    European commission, “Fibre is the most energy efficient broadband technology | Shaping Europe’s digital future,” Brussels, 24, Nov. 2020. Accessed: Jan. 22, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/fibre-most-energy-efficient- broadband-technology

    2020

  67. [76]

    How LCA contributes to the environmental assessment of higher order effects of ICT application: A review of different approaches,

    J. Pohl, L. M. Hilty, and M. Finkbeiner, “How LCA contributes to the environmental assessment of higher order effects of ICT application: A review of different approaches,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 219, pp. 698–712, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.018

    2019 doi

  68. [77]

    Satellite Earth Stations and Systems (SES); Environmental impact of satellite broadband network; Full LCA (Life Cycle Assessment),

    European Telecommunications Standards Institute, “Satellite Earth Stations and Systems (SES); Environmental impact of satellite broadband network; Full LCA (Life Cycle Assessment),” ETSI, France, Technical Report ETSI TR 103 353 V1.1.1, 2023

    2023

  69. [78]

    Multi-Access Edge Computing: A Survey,

    A. Filali, A. Abouaomar, S. Cherkaoui, A. Kobbane, and M. Guizani, “Multi-Access Edge Computing: A Survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 197017–197046, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3034136

    2020

  70. [79]

    EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2023,

    European Environment Agency, “EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2023,” European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Environmental Report, 2023. Accessed: Jan. 22, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://efdb.apps.eea.europa.eu/?source=%7B%22query%22%3A%7B%22match_all%...

    2023

  71. [80]

    Carbon emissions and mitigation potentials of 5G base station in China,

    Y . Ding, H. Duan, M. Xie, R. Mao, J. Wang, and W. Zhang, “Carbon emissions and mitigation potentials of 5G base station in China,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 182, p. 106339, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106339

    2022

  72. [81]

    A comparative life cycle assessment of lithium-ion and lead-acid batteries for grid energy storage,

    R. Yudhistira, D. Khatiwada, and F. Sanchez, “A comparative life cycle assessment of lithium-ion and lead-acid batteries for grid energy storage,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 358, p. 131999, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131999

    2022

  73. [82]

    Environmental and economic performance analysis of recycling waste printed circuit boards using life cycle assessment,

    P. Pokhrel, S.-L. Lin, and C.-T. Tsai, “Environmental and economic performance analysis of recycling waste printed circuit boards using life cycle assessment,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 276, p. 111276, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111276

    2020

  74. [83]

    The Last-mile Internet Connectivity Solutions Guide: Sustainable connectivity options for unconnected sites,

    ITU, “The Last-mile Internet Connectivity Solutions Guide: Sustainable connectivity options for unconnected sites,” International Telecommunication Union, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-d/opb/tnd/D-TND-01-2020-PDF-E.pdf

    2020

  75. [84]

    Supportive 5G Infrastructure Policies are Essential for Universal 6G: Assessment Using an Open-Source Techno-Economic Simulation Model Utilizing Remote Sensing,

    E. J. Oughton and A. Jha, “Supportive 5G Infrastructure Policies are Essential for Universal 6G: Assessment Using an Open-Source Techno-Economic Simulation Model Utilizing Remote Sensing,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 101924–101945, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3097627

    2021

  76. [85]

    A Broadband Power-Line Communication System Design Scheme for Typical Tanzanian Low-V oltage Network,

    J. Anatory, N. Theethayi, R. Thottappillil, and N. H. Mvungi, “A Broadband Power-Line Communication System Design Scheme for Typical Tanzanian Low-V oltage Network,” Osoro, Oughton & Kauker 35 IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1218–1224, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1109/TPW...

    2009

  77. [86]

    Energy consumption in wired and wireless access networks,

    J. Baliga, R. Ayre, K. Hinton, and R. S. Tucker, “Energy consumption in wired and wireless access networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 70–77, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2011.5783987

    2011

  78. [87]

    Social Cost of Carbon 101,

    K. Rennert and C. Kingdon, “Social Cost of Carbon 101,” Resources for the Future, Washington DC, 2022. Accessed: Jun. 03, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.rff.org/publications/explainers/social-cost-carbon-101/

    2022

  79. [88]

    Global Administrative Areas Boundaries

    GADM, “Global Administrative Areas Boundaries.” Accessed: Sep. 14, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://gadm.org/download_world.html

    2022

  80. [89]

    WorldPop :: Population Counts

    WorldPop Organization, “WorldPop :: Population Counts.” Accessed: Sep. 14, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://hub.worldpop.org/project/categories?id=3

    2022

  81. [90]

    Cost of Capital

    New York State University, “Cost of Capital.” Accessed: Jun. 03, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/wacc.html

    2024

  82. [91]

    Future Proof: Economics of Rural Broadband,

    The Rural Broadband Association, “Future Proof: Economics of Rural Broadband,” The Rural Broadband Association, Arlington, White Paper, 2021. Accessed: Jun. 03, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ntca.org/home

    2021

  83. [92]

    African Terrestrial Fibre Optic Cable Mapping Project,

    S. Song, “African Terrestrial Fibre Optic Cable Mapping Project,” Many Possibilities. Accessed: Feb. 11, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://manypossibilities.net/afterfibre/

    2024

  84. [93]

    Overture 2024-02-15-alpha.0 Release Notes,

    Overture Maps Foundation, “Overture 2024-02-15-alpha.0 Release Notes,” 2024. Accessed: Apr. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://overturemaps.org/overture-2024-02-15-alpha-0- release-notes/

    2024

  85. [94]

    All Type Armored Optical Fiber Cable & Specification,

    Hone Inc., “All Type Armored Optical Fiber Cable & Specification,” HOC. Accessed: Feb. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.honecable.com/armored-optical-fiber-cable/

    2024

  86. [95]

    Carbon emissions of 5G mobile networks in China,

    T. Li et al., “Carbon emissions of 5G mobile networks in China,” Nat. Sustain., vol. 6, no. 12, Art. no. 12, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41893-023-01206-5

    2023 doi

  87. [96]

    Assessing the emissions footprint of the fibre networks relative to other fixed broadband options in New Zealand,

    A. Kelly and C. Comendant, “Assessing the emissions footprint of the fibre networks relative to other fixed broadband options in New Zealand,” Auckland, Technical Report,

  88. [97]

    Government conversion factors for company reporting of greenhouse gas emissions,

    United Kingdom Government, “Government conversion factors for company reporting of greenhouse gas emissions,” Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, London, Jun. 2023. Accessed: Feb. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/gove...

    2023

  89. [98]

    Power consumption model for macrocell and microcell base stations,

    M. Deruyck, W. Joseph, and L. Martens, “Power consumption model for macrocell and microcell base stations,” Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 320–333, 2014, doi: 10.1002/ett.2565

    2014 doi

  90. [99]

    Fiber Broadband Deployment is Paramount To Achieving Zero Carbon Footprint,

    Fiber Broadband Association, “Fiber Broadband Deployment is Paramount To Achieving Zero Carbon Footprint,” Fiber Broadband Association, Washington DC, Sustainability Working Group, 2024

    2024

  91. [100]

    Research Report: Carbon Footprint of Construction Equipment,

    Climate Neutral Group, “Research Report: Carbon Footprint of Construction Equipment,” European Rental Association, Brussels, 2019

    2019

  92. [101]

    Carbon Dioxide Emissions Coefficients

    US Energy Information Administration, “Carbon Dioxide Emissions Coefficients.” Accessed: Aug. 28, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/co2_vol_mass.php Osoro, Oughton & Kauker 36

    2024

  93. [102]

    Evaluation and projection of 4G and 5G RAN energy footprints: the case of Belgium for 2020–2025,

    L. Golard, J. Louveaux, and D. Bol, “Evaluation and projection of 4G and 5G RAN energy footprints: the case of Belgium for 2020–2025,” Ann. Telecommun., vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 313–327, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12243-022-00932-9

    2020 doi

  94. [103]

    World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files.,

    World Bank Open Data, “World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files.,” World Bank Open Data. Accessed: Nov. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://data.worldbank.org

    2024

  95. [104]

    CO2 emissions (kt) - Sub-Saharan Africa,

    World Bank Open Data, “CO2 emissions (kt) - Sub-Saharan Africa,” World Bank Open Data. Accessed: Nov. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://data.worldbank.org

    2024

  96. [2021]

    24, 2024

    Accessed: Jan. 24, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://srgexpert.com/2023/08/29/the- emissions-footprint-of-broadband-in-new-zealand/

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.