pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.26988 · v1 · pith:OHPUFIAJnew · submitted 2026-05-26 · ⚛️ physics.geo-ph · eess.IV· physics.app-ph

Unveiling magma plumbing systems for volcanic eruptions and crustal accretion via active-seismic matrix imaging

Baptiste H\'eriard-Dubreuil , Milena Marjanovi\'c , Arnaud Burtin , Alexandre Aubry This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 14:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.geo-ph eess.IVphysics.app-ph
keywords matrix imagingmid-ocean ridgemagma reservoiroceanic crust accretionEast Pacific Riseseismic imagingvolcanic plumbingsubmarine eruption
0
0 comments X

The pith

Matrix imaging at the East Pacific Rise reveals a conical on-axis magma reservoir linked by channels that build most of the lower oceanic crust.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies matrix imaging, a controlled-source seismic method, to high-resolution data from the East Pacific Rise 9°50'N segment. It maps a conical magma body directly beneath the ridge axis together with interconnected magma-rich zones that extend through the crust. When these images are compared with ophiolite outcrops, the geometry indicates that magma travels through channels for the first three kilometers of lower-crust construction, after which the uppermost kilometer forms mainly by crystallization in place. This supplies a data-driven picture of how magma is stored, migrates, and triggers the submarine eruptions that produce most of Earth’s new oceanic crust.

Core claim

Matrix imaging recovers a conical on-axis reservoir and a network of interconnected magma-rich zones; combined with ophiolite evidence, these structures show that channelized magma flow dominates the upper three kilometers of lower-crust formation while in-situ crystallization controls the final one kilometer.

What carries the argument

Matrix imaging, which extracts subsurface reflectivity directly from active-source seismic recordings to delineate the geometry and connectivity of magma bodies without conventional migration steps.

If this is right

  • Magma supply to ridge eruptions occurs through a connected network rather than isolated transient lenses.
  • The lower oceanic crust is constructed mainly by focused channel flow in its upper three kilometers.
  • The shallowest one kilometer of crust grows by crystallization from a persistent on-axis melt body.
  • Eruption triggering can be linked to pressure changes within the imaged conical reservoir and its feeder channels.
  • The same imaging approach can be used at other ridge segments to test whether conical reservoirs are a general feature.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the conical geometry holds, it implies focused vertical upwelling of melt from deeper mantle sources rather than broad lateral spreading.
  • The observed connectivity suggests that distant off-axis magma bodies may be recharged from the central reservoir, affecting eruption recurrence intervals.
  • Applying the method to older or slower-spreading ridges could reveal whether channel-dominated accretion changes with spreading rate.
  • The images provide a template for testing numerical models of crustal accretion that currently lack direct geometric constraints.

Load-bearing premise

The imaging procedure recovers the true subsurface reflectivity without velocity-model errors or migration artifacts that would create a false conical shape or false connections between magma zones.

What would settle it

Independent high-resolution imaging or drilling that finds only isolated, vertically stacked lenses with no conical on-axis body or continuous channel network would contradict the central claim.

read the original abstract

Submarine eruptions, accounting for over 80% of Earth's volcanic activity, primarily occur along mid-ocean ridges, where shallow magmatic systems are accessible to high-resolution imaging. Yet, their remoteness often leaves them undetected. Recent seismic studies at the East Pacific Rise (EPR) 9{\deg}50'N-one of the most dynamic ridge segments, imaged the detailed architecture of the shallowest magma lens, but no data-constrained model yet explains how magma accumulates, migrates, or triggers eruptions. Similarly, the formation of oceanic crust remains poorly understood. While 2-D seismic data reveal only a few vertically stacked, transient magma lenses, our study applies matrix imaging, a novel technique in controlled-source seismology, to map the inner structure of on- and off-axis magma reservoirs. We uncover a conical on-axis reservoir and interconnected magma-rich zones throughout the crust. Combined with ophiolite evidence, these findings reveal that magma channels dominate the first 3 km for lower crust formation, while in situ crystallization prevails in the final 1 km, resolving a long-standing debate.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper applies matrix imaging—a novel technique in controlled-source seismology—to active-source seismic data from the East Pacific Rise at 9°50'N. It reports imaging a conical on-axis magma reservoir together with interconnected magma-rich zones throughout the crust; combined with ophiolite observations, the authors conclude that magma channels dominate lower-crust formation in the upper 3 km while in-situ crystallization dominates the final 1 km.

Significance. If the imaged geometry is shown to be free of migration artifacts and velocity-model bias, the result would provide the first data-constrained three-dimensional view of on-axis magma plumbing at an intermediate-spreading ridge and would directly address the long-standing channel-versus-in-situ debate for oceanic-crust accretion. The absence of any synthetic recovery tests or quantitative resolution metrics currently prevents that assessment.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods (matrix-imaging procedure) and Results (imaged geometry)] The manuscript contains no description of end-to-end synthetic recovery experiments in which a known conical reservoir is embedded in a realistic EPR velocity model and then imaged with the same matrix-imaging operator and acquisition geometry. Without such tests it is impossible to determine whether the reported conical geometry and connectivity are faithful or are produced by the imaging operator itself.
  2. [Results and Interpretation sections] No quantitative comparison is presented between the matrix-imaged conical body and independent wide-angle refraction or conventional MCS migration results at the same location; such a cross-check is required to establish that the 3 km / 1 km transition is not an artifact of the new imaging method.
  3. [Interpretation (crustal-accretion model)] The 3 km versus 1 km depth division that underpins the channel-versus-in-situ conclusion is stated without error bars, resolution estimates, or sensitivity tests to velocity-model perturbations; the division is therefore not yet load-bearing.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains the literal string '9{\deg}50'N'; this should be rendered as the degree symbol in the final version.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive review. The comments highlight important aspects of validation that will strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods (matrix-imaging procedure) and Results (imaged geometry)] The manuscript contains no description of end-to-end synthetic recovery experiments in which a known conical reservoir is embedded in a realistic EPR velocity model and then imaged with the same matrix-imaging operator and acquisition geometry. Without such tests it is impossible to determine whether the reported conical geometry and connectivity are faithful or are produced by the imaging operator itself.

    Authors: We agree that end-to-end synthetic recovery tests are the most direct way to quantify potential operator-induced artifacts. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection describing such experiments: a realistic EPR background velocity model with an embedded conical low-velocity body will be forward-modeled using the same source-receiver geometry, and the resulting data will be processed through the identical matrix-imaging workflow. The recovered image will be compared quantitatively with the input model to demonstrate that the conical shape and connectivity are not artifacts of the operator. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results and Interpretation sections] No quantitative comparison is presented between the matrix-imaged conical body and independent wide-angle refraction or conventional MCS migration results at the same location; such a cross-check is required to establish that the 3 km / 1 km transition is not an artifact of the new imaging method.

    Authors: We will incorporate a new figure and accompanying text that overlays the matrix-imaged low-velocity body on previously published wide-angle refraction tomography and conventional pre-stack depth-migrated MCS images from the EPR 9°50'N area. Quantitative metrics (e.g., depth of the top and base of the imaged body, lateral extent) will be tabulated to show consistency across methods and to confirm that the 3 km / 1 km transition is not method-specific. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Interpretation (crustal-accretion model)] The 3 km versus 1 km depth division that underpins the channel-versus-in-situ conclusion is stated without error bars, resolution estimates, or sensitivity tests to velocity-model perturbations; the division is therefore not yet load-bearing.

    Authors: We accept that the depth division requires quantitative support. In revision we will (i) report vertical and lateral resolution estimates derived from the point-spread function of the matrix-imaging operator, (ii) attach uncertainty ranges to the 3 km and 1 km horizons based on these resolution limits, and (iii) perform a set of sensitivity tests in which the background velocity model is perturbed within the range allowed by existing refraction data; the resulting changes in the imaged body will be quantified to demonstrate that the 3 km / 1 km transition remains stable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; imaging results plus external ophiolite data support claims independently

full rationale

The derivation applies matrix imaging (described as a novel technique) to controlled-source seismic data at EPR 9°50'N to recover reflectivity, yielding the conical on-axis reservoir and interconnected zones. The crustal accretion interpretation (channels for first 3 km, in situ for final 1 km) is then combined with external ophiolite evidence. No equation, fit, or self-citation in the abstract or described chain reduces the target geometry or connectivity to an input parameter or prior result by construction. The method is presented as recovering true subsurface structure from data, with the strongest claim resting on that output plus independent observations rather than tautological re-expression of fitted values.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central claim rests on the unstated assumption that matrix imaging faithfully recovers subsurface structure.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5743 in / 1037 out tokens · 33686 ms · 2026-06-29T14:29:58.338672+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N. L. Bowen, The later stages of the evolution of the igneous rocks.The Journal of Geology 23, 1–91 (1915)

    1915

  2. [2]

    K. V . Cashman, R. S. J. Sparks, J. D. Blundy, Vertically extensive and unstable magmatic systems: a unified view of igneous processes.Science355, eaag3055 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    crystal’s-eye

    K. M. Cooper, What does a magma reservoir look like? the “crystal’s-eye” view.Elements13, 23–28 (2017)

    2017

  4. [4]

    Sparks, C

    R. Sparks, C. Annen, J. Blundy, K. Cashman, A. Rust, M. Jackson, Formation and dynamics of magma reservoirs.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences377(2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    Solano, M

    J. Solano, M. Jackson, R. Sparks, J. D. Blundy, C. Annen, Melt segregation in deep crustal hot zones: a mechanism for chemical differentiation, crustal assimilation and the formation of evolved magmas.Journal of Petrology53, 1999–2026 (2012)

    1999

  6. [6]

    K. V . Cashman, R. S. J. Sparks, How volcanoes work: A 25 year perspective.Bulletin125, 664–690 (2013). 20

    2013

  7. [7]

    Annen, J

    C. Annen, J. D. Blundy, J. Leuthold, R. S. J. Sparks, Construction and evolution of igneous bodies: Towards an integrated perspective of crustal magmatism.Lithos230, 206–221 (2015)

    2015

  8. [8]

    Colman, J

    A. Colman, J. M. Sinton, V . D. Wanless, Constraints from melt inclusions on depths of magma residence at intermediate magma supply along the gal ´apagos spreading center.Earth and Planetary Science Letters412, 122–131 (2015)

    2015

  9. [9]

    Werner, D

    C. Werner, D. J. Rasmussen, T. Plank, P. J. Kelly, C. Kern, T. Lopez, J. Gliss, J. Power, D. Roman, P. Izbekov,et al., Linking subsurface to surface using gas emission and melt in- clusion data at mount cleveland volcano, alaska.Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems21, e2019GC008882 (2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    P. E. Wieser, M. Edmonds, J. Maclennan, J. Wheeler, Microstructural constraints on magmatic mushes under k¯ılauea volcano, hawai’i.Nature Communications11, 14 (2020)

    2020

  11. [11]

    Koulakov, E

    I. Koulakov, E. Kasatkina, N. M. Shapiro, C. Jaupart, A. Vasilevsky, S. El Khrepy, N. Al-Arifi, S. Smirnov, The feeder system of the toba supervolcano from the slab to the shallow reservoir. Nature communications7, 12228 (2016)

    2016

  12. [12]

    S. E. Johansen, M. Panzner, R. Mittet, H. E. Amundsen, A. Lim, E. Vik, M. Landrø, B. Arntsen, Deep electrical imaging of the ultraslow-spreading mohns ridge.Nature567, 379–383 (2019)

    2019

  13. [13]

    H. A. Janiszewski, L. S. Wagner, D. C. Roman, Aseismic mid-crustal magma reservoir at cleveland volcano imaged through novel receiver function analyses.Scientific reports10, 1780 (2020)

    2020

  14. [14]

    Wawrzyniak, F

    P. Wawrzyniak, F. Gaillard, S. Hautot, J. Andujar, P. Tarits, L. Arbaret, S. Guegan, D. Sifr´e, J.- F. D’eu, J. Deparis,et al., Magnetotelluric evidence for a melt-rich magmatic reservoir beneath mayotte.Naturepp. 1–7 (2025). 21

    2025

  15. [15]

    Kiser, I

    E. Kiser, I. Palomeras, A. Levander, C. Zelt, S. Harder, B. Schmandt, S. Hansen, K. Creager, C. Ulberg, Magma reservoirs from the upper crust to the moho inferred from high-resolution vp and vs models beneath mount st. helens, washington state, usa.Geology44, 411–414 (2016)

    2016

  16. [16]

    Kiser, A

    E. Kiser, A. Levander, C. Zelt, B. Schmandt, S. Hansen, Focusing of melt near the top of the mount st. helens (usa) magma reservoir and its relationship to major volcanic eruptions. Geology46, 775–778 (2018)

    2018

  17. [17]

    K. R. Autumn, E. E. Hooft, D. R. Toomey, Exploring mid-to-lower crustal magma plumb- ing of santorini and kolumbo volcanoes using pmp tomography.Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems26, e2025GC012170 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    C. W. Ulberg, K. C. Creager, S. C. Moran, G. A. Abers, W. A. Thelen, A. Levander, E. Kiser, B. Schmandt, S. M. Hansen, R. S. Crosson, Local source vp and vs tomography in the mount st. helens region with the imush broadband array.Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems21, e2019GC008888 (2020)

    2020

  19. [19]

    R. T. Weekly, W. S. Wilcock, E. E. Hooft, D. R. Toomey, P. R. McGill, D. S. Stakes, Ter- mination of a 6 year ridge-spreading event observed using a seafloor seismic network on the endeavour segment, juan de fuca ridge.Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems14, 1375– 1398 (2013)

    2013

  20. [20]

    W. S. Wilcock, M. Tolstoy, F. Waldhauser, C. Garcia, Y . J. Tan, D. R. Bohnenstiehl, J. Caplan- Auerbach, R. P. Dziak, A. F. Arnulf, M. E. Mann, Seismic constraints on caldera dynamics from the 2015 axial seamount eruption.Science354, 1395–1399 (2016)

    2015

  21. [21]

    Tolstoy, J

    M. Tolstoy, J. Cowen, E. Baker, D. Fornari, K. Rubin, T. Shank, F. Waldhauser, D. Bohnen- stiehl, D. Forsyth, R. Holmes,et al., A sea-floor spreading event captured by seismometers. Science314, 1920–1922 (2006). 22

    1920

  22. [22]

    Y . J. Tan, M. Tolstoy, F. Waldhauser, W. S. Wilcock, Dynamics of a seafloor-spreading episode at the east pacific rise.Nature540, 261–265 (2016)

    2016

  23. [23]

    Cann, New model for the structure of the ocean crust.Nature226, 928–930 (1970)

    J. Cann, New model for the structure of the ocean crust.Nature226, 928–930 (1970)

    1970

  24. [24]

    Cann, A model for oceanic crystal structure developed.Geophysical Journal International 39, 169–187 (1974)

    J. Cann, A model for oceanic crystal structure developed.Geophysical Journal International 39, 169–187 (1974)

    1974

  25. [25]

    J. S. Pallister, C. A. Hopson, Samail ophiolite plutonic suite: field relations, phase variation, cryptic variation and layering, and a model of a spreading ridge magma chamber.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth86, 2593–2644 (1981)

    1981

  26. [26]

    J. D. Smewing, Mixing characteristics and compositional differences in mantle-derived melts beneath spreading axes: Evidence from cyclically layered rocks in the ophiolite of north oman. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth86, 2645–2659 (1981)

    1981

  27. [27]

    Herron, W

    T. Herron, W. Ludwig, P. Stoffa, T. Kan, P. Buhl, Structure of the east pacific rise crest from multichannel seismic reflection data.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth83, 798– 804 (1978)

    1978

  28. [28]

    T. J. Herron, P. L. Stoffa, P. Buhl, Magma chamber and mantle reflections–east pacific rise. Geophysical Research Letters7, 989–992 (1980)

    1980

  29. [29]

    Detrick, P

    R. Detrick, P. Buhl, E. Vera, J. Mutter, J. Orcutt, J. Madsen, T. Brocher, Multi-channel seismic imaging of a crustal magma chamber along the east pacific rise.Nature326, 35–41 (1987)

    1987

  30. [30]

    R. S. Detrick, A. J. Harding, G. M. Kent, J. A. Orcutt, J. C. Mutter, P. Buhl, Seismic structure of the southern east pacific rise.Science259, 499–503 (1993)

    1993

  31. [31]

    R. A. Dunn, D. R. Toomey, S. C. Solomon, Three-dimensional seismic structure and physical properties of the crust and shallow mantle beneath the east pacific rise at 9° 30’n.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth105, 23537–23555 (2000). 23

    2000

  32. [32]

    Marjanovi ´c, S

    M. Marjanovi ´c, S. M. Carbotte, H. Carton, M. R. Nedimovi ´c, J. C. Mutter, J. P. Canales, A multi-sill magma plumbing system beneath the axis of the east pacific rise.Nature Geoscience 7, 825–829 (2014)

    2014

  33. [33]

    J. P. Canales, R. A. Dunn, R. Arai, R. A. Sohn, Seismic imaging of magma sills beneath an ultramafic-hosted hydrothermal system.Geology45, 451–454 (2017)

    2017

  34. [34]

    Marjanovi ´c, S

    M. Marjanovi ´c, S. M. Carbotte, H. D. Carton, M. R. Nedimovi ´c, J. P. Canales, J. C. Mutter, Crustal magmatic system beneath the east pacific rise (8 20’ to 10 10’ n): Implications for tectonomagmatic segmentation and crustal melt transport at fast-spreading ridges.Geochem- istry, Geophysics, Geosystems19, 4584–4611 (2018)

    2018

  35. [35]

    Boddupalli, J

    B. Boddupalli, J. Canales, Distribution of crustal melt bodies at the hot spot-influenced sec- tion of the gal´apagos spreading centre from seismic reflection images.Geophysical Research Letters46, 4664–4673 (2019)

    2019

  36. [36]

    S. M. Carbotte, A. Arnulf, M. Spiegelman, M. Lee, A. Harding, G. Kent, J. P. Canales, M. Ned- imovi´c, Stacked sills forming a deep melt-mush feeder conduit beneath axial seamount.Ge- ology48, 693–697 (2020)

    2020

  37. [37]

    S. M. Carbotte, M. Marjanovi ´c, A. F. Arnulf, M. R. Nedimovi´c, J. P. Canales, G. M. Arnoux, Stacked magma lenses beneath mid-ocean ridges: Insights from new seismic observations and synthesis with prior geophysical and geologic findings.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth126, e2020JB021434 (2021)

    2021

  38. [38]

    Nicolas, I

    A. Nicolas, I. Reuber, K. Benn, A new magma chamber model based on structural studies in the oman ophiolite.Tectonophysics151, 87–105 (1988)

    1988

  39. [39]

    Nicolas, F

    A. Nicolas, F. Boudier, L. France, Subsidence in magma chamber and the development of magmatic foliation in oman ophiolite gabbros.Earth and Planetary Science Letters284, 76– 87 (2009). 24

    2009

  40. [40]

    P. B. Kelemen, E. Aharanov, Periodic formation of magma fractures and generation of lay- ered gabbros in the lower crust beneath oceanic spreading ridges.Geophysical Monograph- American Geophysical Union106, 267–290 (1998)

    1998

  41. [41]

    Korenaga, P

    J. Korenaga, P. B. Kelemen, Melt migration through the oceanic lower crust: a constraint from melt percolation modeling with finite solid diffusion.Earth and Planetary Science Letters 156, 1–11 (1998)

    1998

  42. [42]

    C. J. MacLeod, G. Yaouancq, A fossil melt lens in the oman ophiolite: Implications for magma chamber processes at fast spreading ridges.Earth and Planetary Science Letters176, 357–373 (2000)

    2000

  43. [43]

    C. J. Lissenberg, C. J. MacLeod, K. A. Howard, M. Godard, Pervasive reactive melt migration through fast-spreading lower oceanic crust (hess deep, equatorial pacific ocean).Earth and Planetary Science Letters361, 436–447 (2013)

    2013

  44. [44]

    Lambert, L

    W. Lambert, L. A. Cobus, M. Couade, M. Fink, A. Aubry, Reflection matrix approach for quantitative imaging of scattering media.Physical Review X10, 021048 (2020)

    2020

  45. [45]

    Bureau, J

    F. Bureau, J. Robin, A. Le Ber, W. Lambert, M. Fink, A. Aubry, Three-dimensional ultrasound matrix imaging.Nature Communications14, 6793 (2023)

    2023

  46. [46]

    S. Yoon, M. Kim, M. Jang, Y . Choi, W. Choi, S. Kang, W. Choi, Deep optical imaging within complex scattering media.Nature Reviews Physics2, 141–158 (2020)

    2020

  47. [47]

    Badon, V

    A. Badon, V . Barolle, K. Irsch, A. C. Boccara, M. Fink, A. Aubry, Distortion matrix concept for deep optical imaging in scattering media.Science Advances6, eaay7170 (2020)

    2020

  48. [48]

    Blondel, J

    T. Blondel, J. Chaput, A. Derode, M. Campillo, A. Aubry, Matrix approach of seismic imag- ing: Application to the erebus volcano, antarctica.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth123, 10–936 (2018). 25

    2018

  49. [49]

    Giraudat, A

    E. Giraudat, A. Burtin, A. Le Ber, M. Fink, J.-C. Komorowski, A. Aubry, Matrix imaging as a tool for high-resolution monitoring of deep volcanic plumbing systems with seismic noise. Communications Earth & Environment5, 509 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    J. Wei, Q. Liu, J. Li, L. Chen, Multilayered plumbing beneath mount st. helens revealed from a high-resolution seismic matrix-imaging method.Geophysical Research Letters52, e2025GL119943 (2025)

    2025

  51. [51]

    Haymon, D

    R. Haymon, D. Fornari, K. L. V on Damm, M. Lilley, M. Perfit, J. Edmond, W. C. Shanks III, R. Lutz, J. Grebmeier, S. Carbotte,et al., V olcanic eruption of the mid-ocean ridge along the east pacific rise crest at 9 45–52’ n: Direct submersible observations of seafloor phenomena associated with an eruption event in april, 1991.Earth and Planetary Science L...

    1991

  52. [52]

    Rubin, J

    K. Rubin, J. Macdougall, M. Perfit, 210po–210pb dating of recent volcanic eruptions on the sea floor.Nature368, 841–844 (1994)

    1994

  53. [53]

    S. A. Soule, D. J. Fornari, M. R. Perfit, K. H. Rubin, New insights into mid-ocean ridge volcanic processes from the 2005–2006 eruption of the east pacific rise, 9 46’ n–9 56’ n. Geology35, 1079–1082 (2007)

    2005

  54. [54]

    S. R. S. Walter, A. S. Wozniak, S. Wagner, M. Yucel, G. W. Luther, S. M. McNichol, D. J. Fornari, V . Preston, A. D. Skarke, T. Barreyre,et al., Direct observations a seafloor volcanic eruption starting 29th april 2025 on the east pacific rise at 9° 50’n.In AGU Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA(2025)

    2025

  55. [55]

    A. e. a. Wozniak, Direct observations of the april 29, 2025, mid-ocean ridge seafloor volcanic eruption at 9°50’n, east pacific rise using advanced sensor and imagery technologies.In Ocean Sciences Meeting, Glasgow, Scotland(2026)

    2025

  56. [56]

    Marjanovi ´c, S

    M. Marjanovi ´c, S. M. Carbotte, A. Stopin, S. C. Singh, R.- ´E. Plessix, M. Marjanovi ´c, M. R. Nedimovi´c, J. P. Canales, H. D. Carton, J. C. Mutter,et al., Insights into dike nucleation 26 and eruption dynamics from high-resolution seismic imaging of magmatic system at the east pacific rise.Science Advances9, eadi2698 (2023)

    2023

  57. [57]

    Canales, H

    J. Canales, H. Carton, S. Carbotte, J. Mutter, M. Nedimovi ´c, M. Xu, O. Aghaei, M. Mar- janovi´c, K. Newman, Network of off-axis melt bodies at the east pacific rise.Nature Geo- science5, 279–283 (2012)

    2012

  58. [58]

    S. Han, S. M. Carbotte, H. Carton, J. C. Mutter, O. Aghaei, M. R. Nedimovi ´c, J. P. Canales, Architecture of on-and off-axis magma bodies at epr 9 37–40’ n and implications for oceanic crustal accretion.Earth and Planetary Science Letters390, 31–44 (2014)

    2014

  59. [59]

    Aghaei, M

    O. Aghaei, M. R. Nedimovi ´c, M. Marjanovi ´c, S. M. Carbotte, J. Pablo Canales, H. Carton, N. Niki ´c, Constraints on melt content of off-axis magma lenses at the east pacific rise from analysis of 3-d seismic amplitude variation with angle of incidence.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth122, 4123–4142 (2017)

    2017

  60. [60]

    Touma, T

    R. Touma, T. Blondel, A. Derode, M. Campillo, A. Aubry, A distortion matrix framework for high-resolution passive seismic 3-d imaging: Application to the san jacinto fault zone, california.Geophysical Journal International226, 780–794 (2021)

    2021

  61. [61]

    H. W. Babcock, The possibility of compensating astronomical seeing.Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific65, 229–236 (1953)

    1953

  62. [62]

    Touma, A

    R. Touma, A. Le Ber, M. Campillo, A. Aubry, Imaging the crustal and upper mantle structure of the north anatolian fault: A transmission matrix framework for local adaptive focusing. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth128, e2023JB026704 (2023)

    2023

  63. [63]

    R. H. Hardin, Application of the split-step fourier method to the numerical solution of nonlin- ear and variable coefficient wave equations.SAIM Rev.15, 423 (1973)

    1973

  64. [64]

    Aghaei, M

    O. Aghaei, M. R. Nedimovi ´c, H. Carton, S. M. Carbotte, J. P. Canales, J. C. Mutter, Crustal thickness and moho character of the fast-spreading east pacific rise from 9° 42’ n to 9° 57’ n 27 from poststack-migrated 3-d mcs data.Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems15, 634–657 (2014)

    2014

  65. [65]

    S. M. Carbotte, M. Marjanovi ´c, H. Carton, J. C. Mutter, J. P. Canales, M. R. Nedimovi ´c, S. Han, M. R. Perfit, Fine-scale segmentation of the crustal magma reservoir beneath the east pacific rise.Nature Geoscience6, 866–870 (2013)

    2013

  66. [66]

    W. S. Wilcock, S. C. Solomon, G. Purdy, D. R. Toomey, Seismic attenuation structure of the east pacific rise near 9° 30’ n.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth100, 24147– 24165 (1995)

    1995

  67. [67]

    R. A. Dunn, A dual-level magmatic system beneath the east pacific rise, 9 n.Geophysical Research Letters49, e2022GL097732 (2022)

    2022

  68. [68]

    Mainprice, Modelling the anisotropic seismic properties of partially molten rocks found at mid-ocean ridges.Tectonophysics279, 161–179 (1997)

    D. Mainprice, Modelling the anisotropic seismic properties of partially molten rocks found at mid-ocean ridges.Tectonophysics279, 161–179 (1997)

    1997

  69. [69]

    Boudier, A

    F. Boudier, A. Nicolas, B. Ildefonse, Magma chambers in the oman ophiolite: fed from the top and the bottom.Earth and Planetary Science Letters144, 239–250 (1996)

    1996

  70. [70]

    J. A. VanTongeren, P. B. Kelemen, K. Hanghøj, Cooling rates in the lower crust of the oman ophiolite: Ca in olivine, revisited.Earth and Planetary Science Letters267, 69–82 (2008)

    2008

  71. [71]

    J. A. Vantongeren, P. Kelemen, C. J. Garrido, M. Godard, K. Hanghoj, M. Braun, J. Pearce, The composition of the lower oceanic crust in the wadi khafifah section of the southern samail (oman) ophiolite.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth126, e2021JB021986 (2021)

    2021

  72. [72]

    Koepke, D

    J. Koepke, D. Garbe-Sch ¨onberg, T. M ¨uller, D. Mock, S. M ¨uller, S. Nasir, A reference sec- tion through fast-spread lower oceanic crust, wadi gideah, samail ophiolite (sultanate of oman): Petrography and petrology.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth127, e2021JB022735 (2022). 28

    2022

  73. [73]

    P. B. Kelemen, K. Koga, N. Shimizu, Geochemistry of gabbro sills in the crust-mantle transi- tion zone of the oman ophiolite: implications for the origin of the oceanic lower crust.Earth and Planetary Science Letters146, 475–488 (1997)

    1997

  74. [74]

    C. J. Lissenberg, J. B ´edard, C. Van Staal, The structure and geochemistry of the gabbro zone of the annieopsquotch ophiolite, newfoundland: implications for lower crustal accretion at spreading ridges.Earth and Planetary Science Letters229, 105–123 (2004)

    2004

  75. [75]

    C. J. Lissenberg, C. J. MacLeod, E. N. Bennett, Consequences of a crystal mush-dominated magma plumbing system: a mid-ocean ridge perspective.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences377(2019)

    2019

  76. [76]

    F. M. Richter, D. McKenzie, Dynamical models for melt segregation from a deformable ma- trix.The Journal of Geology92, 729–740 (1984)

    1984

  77. [77]

    J. E. Quick, R. P. Denlinger, Ductile deformation and the origin of layered gabbro in ophiolites. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth98, 14015–14027 (1993)

    1993

  78. [78]

    H ´eriard-Dubreuil, E

    B. H ´eriard-Dubreuil, E. Brenner, B. Rio, W. Lambert, F. Chamming’s, M. Fink, A. Aubry, Physics-based learning of the wave speed landscape in complex media.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.03281(2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  79. [79]

    Carrara, P

    A. Carrara, P. Lesage, A. Burgisser, C. Annen, G. W. Bergantz, The dispersive velocity of compressional waves in magmatic suspensions.Geophysical Journal International228, 2122– 2136 (2022)

    2022

  80. [80]

    Lambert, L

    W. Lambert, L. A. Cobus, T. Frappart, M. Fink, A. Aubry, Distortion matrix approach for ultrasound imaging of random scattering media.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117, 14645–14656 (2020). 29

    2020

Showing first 80 references.