Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A decomposition of Fisher's information to inform sample size for developing fair and precise clinical prediction models -- Part 2: time-to-event outcomes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.14482 v1 pith:OIBN6TO4 submitted 2025-01-24 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords modelrisksamplesizeclinicaldevelopingestimatesexamine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Background: When developing a clinical prediction model using time-to-event data, previous research focuses on the sample size to minimise overfitting and precisely estimate the overall risk. However, instability of individual-level risk estimates may still be large. Methods: We propose a decomposition of Fisher's information matrix to examine and calculate the sample size required for developing a model that aims for precise and fair risk estimates. We propose a six-step process which can be used before data collection or when an existing dataset is available. Steps (1) to (5) require researchers to specify the overall risk in the target population at a key time-point of interest; an assumed pragmatic 'core model' in the form of an exponential regression model; the (anticipated) joint distribution of core predictors included in that model; and the distribution of any censoring. Results: We derive closed-form solutions that decompose the variance of an individual's estimated event rate into Fisher's unit information matrix, predictor values and total sample size; this allows researchers to calculate and examine uncertainty distributions around individual risk estimates and misclassification probabilities for specified sample sizes. We provide an illustrative example in breast cancer and emphasise the importance of clinical context, including risk thresholds for decision making, and examine fairness concerns for pre- and post-menopausal women. Lastly, in two empirical evaluations, we provide reassurance that uncertainty interval widths based on our approach are close to using more flexible models. Conclusions: Our approach allows users to identify the (target) sample size required to develop a prediction model for time-to-event outcomes, via the pmstabilityss module. It aims to facilitate models with improved trust, reliability and fairness in individual-level predictions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A decomposition of Fisher's information to inform sample size for developing or updating fair and precise clinical prediction models -- Part 3: continuous outcomes

    stat.ME 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The authors derive closed-form sample size formulas from Fisher's unit information matrix to target prediction confidence interval widths for linear regression models with continuous outcomes.

  2. Critical Appraisal of Fairness Metrics in Clinical Predictive AI

    cs.LG 2025-06 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    A scoping review of 62 fairness metrics for clinical predictive AI finds a fragmented, threshold-dependent landscape with only one clinical utility metric.

Pith tools