Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

How much is too much? Measuring divergence from Benford's Law with the Equivalent Contamination Proportion (ECP)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.09915 v2 pith:OJIBWRFP submitted 2025-06-11 econ.EM

classification econ.EM
keywords divergencecontaminationproportionsamplestatisticsacrossbenforddifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Conformity with Benford's Law is widely used to detect irregularities in numerical datasets, particularly in accounting, finance, and economics. However, the statistical tools commonly used for this purpose (such as Chi-squared, MAD, or KS) suffer from three key limitations: sensitivity to sample size, lack of interpretability of their scale, and the absence of a common metric that allows for comparison across different statistics. This paper introduces the Equivalent Contamination Proportion (ECP) to address these issues. Defined as the proportion of contamination in a hypothetical Benford-conforming sample such that the expected value of the divergence statistic matches the one observed in the actual data, the ECP provides a continuous and interpretable measure of deviation (ranging from 0 to 1), is robust to sample size, and offers consistent results across different divergence statistics under mild conditions. Closed-form and simulation-based methods are developed for estimating the ECP, and, through a retrospective analysis of three influential studies, it is shown how the ECP can complement the information provided by traditional divergence statistics and enhance the interpretation of results.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Manipulation testing based on Benford's Law for discrete scores

    stat.ME 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A Benford's-Law-based framework for RDD manipulation testing that selects a bandwidth and tests score symmetry around the cutoff, but it tests global symmetry rather than local manipulation.

Pith tools