Looking AT the Blue Skies of Bluesky
read the original abstract
The pitfalls of centralized social networks, such as Facebook and Twitter/X, have led to concerns about control, transparency, and accountability. Decentralized social networks have emerged as a result with the goal of empowering users. These decentralized approaches come with their own tradeoffs, and therefore multiple architectures exist. In this paper, we conduct the first large-scale analysis of Bluesky, a prominent decentralized microblogging platform. In contrast to alternative approaches (e.g. Mastodon), Bluesky decomposes and opens the key functions of the platform into subcomponents that can be provided by third party stakeholders. We collect a comprehensive dataset covering all the key elements of Bluesky, study user activity and assess the diversity of providers for each sub-components.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Activist's Guide to the Decentralized Social Universe: A Framework for Exploring How Decentralized Social Networks Can Support Collective Action
A conceptual framework is introduced that links activist needs to decentralized social network features and is applied to compare Mastodon and Bluesky plus example communities.
-
The Activist's Guide to the Decentralized Social Universe: A Framework for Exploring How Decentralized Social Networks Can Support Collective Action
A framework is introduced that links activist needs (minimal overhead, community building, safety, sustainability) to DSN affordances and is applied to compare Mastodon and Bluesky plus example communities.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.