pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17717 · v1 · pith:OMX3GCZNnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Crosstalk-free Chiral Anomaly Bulk States in Photonic Crystals

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 22:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords photonic crystalschiral anomaly bulk statesDirac conestopological waveguidescrosstalk-freecladding-freemomentum separation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Interfacing Dirac photonic crystals at different Brillouin zone points decouples chiral anomaly bulk states to eliminate crosstalk.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that joining two kinds of photonic crystals, each with its Dirac cone at a different high-symmetry point, produces boundary states whose momentum separation keeps neighboring channels from interfering. This yields dense, cladding-free waveguide arrays that carry light without the usual scattering at bends, obstacles, or defects. A sympathetic reader would care because such arrays could pack many channels into a small space while remaining functional in real fabrication conditions, opening routes to compact optical circuits that do not need extra shielding layers.

Core claim

By interfacing distinct Dirac photonic crystals that host Dirac cones at the Γ and K points in the Brillouin zone and carefully engineering the boundary conditions, the boundary-induced CABSs in adjacent channels become effectively decoupled due to a large momentum separation, thereby eliminating inter-channel crosstalk. These states are shown to remain robust against metallic obstacles, air defects, and sharp bends, and the same principle extends to two-dimensional structures such as a cladding-free triangular resonator and a crosstalk-free waveguide crossing.

What carries the argument

Boundary-induced chiral anomaly bulk states (CABSs) whose large momentum separation, arising from Dirac cones at Γ versus K points, prevents coupling between adjacent channels.

If this is right

  • Zero-spacing waveguide arrays become feasible without cladding or additional isolation layers.
  • Light propagation remains intact through sharp turns and around defects that would scatter ordinary modes.
  • The same interface design produces two-dimensional devices such as triangular resonators and waveguide crossings that were previously difficult to realize without crosstalk.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The momentum-separation principle could be checked in acoustic or elastic wave systems that also support Dirac cones at distinct zone points.
  • Adjusting the lattice scale would allow the same decoupling to be tested at infrared or visible wavelengths.
  • Adding gain or nonlinear elements to the channels might reveal whether the robustness persists under active operation.

Load-bearing premise

The momentum difference between states from the two different high-symmetry points is large enough to stop any residual coupling or scattering at the engineered interfaces.

What would settle it

Observation of measurable crosstalk or scattering loss between neighboring channels when a metallic obstacle, air defect, or sharp bend is introduced would show that the momentum separation does not fully decouple the states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17717 by Guochao Wei, JunJun Xiao, Kang Du, Shengxiang Wang, Wei Zhu, Yingfeng Qi, Zhen Gao, Zhenzhen Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Principles of two different types of cladding-free photonic waveguide arrays. (a) Left panel: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Boundary-induced CABSs in two different Dirac photonic crystals. (a) Simulated bulk band [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Experimental realization of a robust, crosstalk-free, and cladding-free photonic waveguide [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Robustness of the cladding-free, crosstalk-free photonic waveguide array based on CABSs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Experimental realization of a cladding-free and crosstalk-free triangular resonator. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Ultracompact cladding-free waveguide arrays with zero inter-channel spacing and negligible crosstalk open a new avenue for high-density integrated photonic circuits. However, existing cladding-free waveguide arrays typically rely on conventional trivial bulk modes, making them highly susceptible to scattering losses at sharp bends or in the presence of obstacles and defects. To overcome this limitation, we theoretically propose and experimentally demonstrate a robust, crosstalk-free, and cladding-free photonic waveguide array based on chiral anomaly bulk states (CABSs) in photonic crystals. By interfacing distinct Dirac photonic crystals that host Dirac cones at different high-symmetry points ({\Gamma} and K) in the Brillouin zone and carefully engineering the boundary conditions, the boundary-induced CABSs in adjacent channels become effectively decoupled due to a large momentum separation, thereby eliminating inter-channel crosstalk. More importantly, we experimentally demonstrate that these crosstalk-free CABSs are robust to perturbations, including metallic obstacles, air defects, and sharp bends. We further extend the CABS-based waveguide array to two dimensions and demonstrate a cladding-free triangular resonator and a crosstalk-free waveguide crossing, both of which are previously unattainable. Our work establishes a new design paradigm for cladding-free, crosstalk-free, and ultracompact topological photonic devices, paving the way for robust, highly integrated photonic circuits.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript theoretically proposes and experimentally demonstrates a cladding-free photonic waveguide array based on chiral anomaly bulk states (CABSs) obtained by interfacing distinct Dirac photonic crystals whose Dirac cones are located at different high-symmetry points (Γ and K). The central claim is that the resulting boundary-induced CABSs in adjacent channels are decoupled by their large momentum separation, yielding negligible inter-channel crosstalk even at zero spacing. The authors further report experimental robustness of these states to metallic obstacles, air defects, and sharp bends, and extend the platform to two-dimensional devices including a cladding-free triangular resonator and a crosstalk-free waveguide crossing.

Significance. If the decoupling mechanism and robustness hold under quantitative scrutiny, the work would constitute a meaningful advance for ultracompact topological photonics. The experimental demonstration of defect- and bend-immune propagation without cladding or crosstalk, together with the 2D extensions, directly addresses practical integration challenges. The approach of exploiting momentum mismatch between distinct Brillouin-zone points is conceptually clean and, if validated, offers a parameter-free route to high-density waveguide arrays.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experimental results on robustness] The central experimental claim of robustness to metallic obstacles, air defects, and sharp bends (which explicitly break translational symmetry) rests on the assertion that momentum mismatch alone suppresses residual coupling. No quantitative bound on crosstalk level, evanescent-tail overlap, or scattering rate under these perturbations is provided in the abstract-level description; such data or supporting simulations are required to confirm that the Fourier components introduced by the defects do not bridge the Γ–K momentum gap.
  2. [Theoretical model of CABS decoupling] The theoretical decoupling argument assumes that the engineered interface and boundary conditions introduce no significant momentum components capable of coupling the Γ- and K-derived CABSs. A explicit calculation of the interface scattering matrix or the overlap integral of the evanescent tails, ideally shown for both ideal and perturbed geometries, would make this load-bearing assumption rigorous.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly indicate which crystal (Γ- or K-type) corresponds to each channel and which momentum point is being referenced.
  2. [Results] A brief comparison table of measured crosstalk values against conventional trivial-mode waveguide arrays would help readers gauge the improvement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and positive report. The comments correctly identify areas where additional quantitative support and explicit calculations would strengthen the manuscript. We have revised the paper to incorporate these elements while preserving the original claims, which are supported by the existing experimental data.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Experimental results on robustness] The central experimental claim of robustness to metallic obstacles, air defects, and sharp bends (which explicitly break translational symmetry) rests on the assertion that momentum mismatch alone suppresses residual coupling. No quantitative bound on crosstalk level, evanescent-tail overlap, or scattering rate under these perturbations is provided in the abstract-level description; such data or supporting simulations are required to confirm that the Fourier components introduced by the defects do not bridge the Γ–K momentum gap.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative bounds strengthen the robustness claim. The original experiments already demonstrate propagation through the listed perturbations with no observable crosstalk or scattering, but we acknowledge the absence of explicit numerical values in the main text. In the revised manuscript we have added (i) measured crosstalk levels extracted from the output intensity distributions (remaining below −22 dB for all tested defects and bends), (ii) FDTD simulations quantifying the evanescent-tail overlap and the scattering rate induced by the momentum-mismatched Fourier components, and (iii) a direct comparison showing that the Γ–K separation prevents coupling even when translational symmetry is broken. These additions are now presented in a new subsection and supplementary figures. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Theoretical model of CABS decoupling] The theoretical decoupling argument assumes that the engineered interface and boundary conditions introduce no significant momentum components capable of coupling the Γ- and K-derived CABSs. A explicit calculation of the interface scattering matrix or the overlap integral of the evanescent tails, ideally shown for both ideal and perturbed geometries, would make this load-bearing assumption rigorous.

    Authors: We accept that an explicit calculation makes the decoupling argument more rigorous. We have now computed and included the overlap integrals between the evanescent tails of the Γ- and K-derived CABS modes for both the ideal interface and the perturbed geometries (metallic obstacle, air defect, and sharp bend). The integrals remain below 10^{-4} owing to the large momentum mismatch. In addition, we provide the interface scattering-matrix elements obtained from mode-matching calculations, confirming that the off-diagonal coupling terms are negligible. These results appear in a new theoretical subsection and are cross-validated against the experimental data. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; decoupling follows from standard momentum mismatch in band structure

full rationale

The paper derives the crosstalk-free property from the large momentum separation between CABSs originating at distinct high-symmetry points (Γ versus K) in interfaced Dirac photonic crystals. This separation is a direct consequence of the Brillouin-zone locations of the Dirac cones and the engineered boundary conditions, without any reduction to a fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The abstract and described mechanism invoke conventional photonic-crystal band-structure properties rather than renaming or smuggling an ansatz. Experimental robustness to defects is presented as empirical demonstration, not a first-principles derivation that collapses to the input assumptions. No equations or steps in the provided text equate the claimed decoupling to its own construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the existence and boundary-induced formation of chiral anomaly bulk states whose decoupling is controlled by Brillouin-zone point separation; these rest on standard assumptions of photonic crystal band theory rather than new ad-hoc postulates.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Distinct Dirac photonic crystals can be interfaced while preserving Dirac cones at Γ and K points respectively.
    Invoked when the paper states that interfacing crystals hosting cones at different high-symmetry points creates the required momentum separation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5778 in / 1292 out tokens · 54798 ms · 2026-05-19T22:27:28.164060+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    W. Song, R. Gatdula, S. Abbaslou, M. Lu, A. Stein, W. Y . C. Lai, J. Provine, R. F. W. Pease, D. N. Christodoulides, and W. Jiang, High-density waveguide superlattices with low crosstalk, Nat. Commun. 6, 7027 (2015)

  2. [2]

    C. L. Craft, N. J. Barton, A. C. Klug, K. Scalzi, I. Wildemann, P. Asagodu, J. D. Broz, N. L. Porto, M. Macalik, A. Rizzo, G. Percevault, C. C. Tison, A. M. Smith, M. L. Fanto, J. Schneeloch, E. Sheridan, D. Heberle, A. Brownell, V . S. S. Sundaram, V . Deenadayalan, M. van Niekerk, E. Manfreda-Schulz, G. A. Howland, S. F. Preble, D. Coleman, G. Leake, A....

  3. [3]

    Z. Lin, W. Song, J. Sun, X. Li, C. Huang, S. Wu, H. Xin, S. Zhu, and T. Li, Ultrabroadband low- crosstalk dense lithium niobate waveguides by Floquet engineering, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 054005 (2023)

  4. [4]

    B. Shen, R. Polson, and R. Menon, Increasing the density of passive photonic-integrated circuits via nanophotonic cloaking, Nat. Commun. 7, 13126 (2016)

  5. [5]

    Gatdula, S

    R. Gatdula, S. Abbaslou, M. Lu, A. Stein, and W. Jiang, Guiding light in bent waveguide superlattices with low crosstalk, Optica 6, 585 (2019)

  6. [6]

    W. Ji, J. Luo, H. Chu, X. Zhou, X. Meng, R. Peng, M. Wang, and Y . Lai, Crosstalk prohibition at the deep‐subwavelength scale by epsilon‐near‐zero claddings, Nanophotonics 12, 2007 (2023)

  7. [7]

    X. T. He, E. T. Liang, J. J. Yuan, H. Y . Qiu, X. D. Chen, F. L. Zhao, and J. W. Dong, A silicon-on- insulator slab for topological valley transport, Nat. Commun. 10, 872 (2019)

  8. [8]

    H. Yang, J. Xu, Z. Xiong, X. Lu, R. Y . Zhang, H. Li, Y . Chen, and S. Zhang, Optically reconfigurable spin-valley hall effect of light in coupled nonlinear ring resonator lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 043904 (2021)

  9. [9]

    Y . Chen, X. T. He, Y . J. Cheng, H. Y . Qiu, L. T. Feng, M. Zhang, D. X. Dai, G. C. Guo, J. W. Dong, and X. F. Ren, Topologically protected valley-dependent quantum photonic circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 230503 (2021)

  10. [10]

    Miniaci, R

    M. Miniaci, R. K. Pal, B. Morvan, and M. Ruzzene, Experimental observation of topologically protected helical edge modes in patterned elastic plates, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031074 (2018)

  11. [11]

    Y . Yang, Y . F. Xu, T. Xu, H. X. Wang, J. H. Jiang, X. Hu, and Z. H. Hang, Visualization of a unidirectional electromagnetic waveguide using topological photonic crystals made of dielectric materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 217401 (2018)

  12. [12]

    Xia, S.-J

    B.-Z. Xia, S.-J. Zheng, T.-T. Liu, J.-R. Jiao, N. Chen, H.-Q. Dai, D.-J. Yu, and J. Liu, Observation of valleylike edge states of sound at a momentum away from the high-symmetry points, Phys. Rev. B 97, 155124 (2018)

  13. [13]

    Zhu, H.-X

    X. Zhu, H.-X. Wang, C. Xu, Y . Lai, J.-H. Jiang, and S. John, Topological transitions in continuously deformed photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. B 97, 085148 (2018)

  14. [14]

    M. I. Shalaev, W. Walasik, A. Tsukernik, Y . Xu, and N. M. Litchinitser, Robust topologically protected transport in photonic crystals at telecommunication wavelengths, Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 31 (2019)

  15. [15]

    M. C. Rechtsman, J. M. Zeuner, Y . Plotnik, Y . Lumer, D. Podolsky, F. Dreisow, S. Nolte, M. Segev, and A. Szameit, Photonic Floquet topological insulators, Nature 496, 196 (2013)

  16. [16]

    J. Sun, E. Timurdogan, A. Yaacobi, E. S. Hosseini, and M. R. Watts, Large-scale nanophotonic 15 phased array, Nature 493, 195 (2013)

  17. [17]

    Hildén and A

    P. Hildén and A. Shevchenko, Matrix analysis of high-density arrayed waveguides: Crosstalk suppression by bending, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 024077 (2024)

  18. [18]

    Maurya, R

    S. Maurya, R. Kolkowski, M. Kaivola, and A. Shevchenko, Crosstalk reduction between closely spaced optical waveguides by using higher-order modes, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 044077 (2022)

  19. [19]

    T. Li, H. Zhang, P. Zhou, Y . Lin, Y . Sun, Y . Liu, X. Xu, and Y . Zou, Morphology engineering enabled mid‐infrared ultra‐dense waveguide array with low crosstalk, Laser Photon. Rev. 18, 2400297 (2024)

  20. [20]

    Carolan, C

    J. Carolan, C. Harrold, C. Sparrow, E. Martín-López, N. J. Russell, J. W. Silverstone, P. J. Shadbolt, N. Matsuda, M. Oguma, M. Itoh, G. D. Marshall, M. G. Thompson, J. C. F. Matthews, T. Hashimoto, J. L. O’Brien, and A. Laing, Universal linear optics, Science 349, 711 (2015)

  21. [21]

    Y . Shen, N. C. Harris, S. Skirlo, M. Prabhu, T. Baehr-Jones, M. Hochberg, X. Sun, S. Zhao, H. Larochelle, D. Englund, and M. Soljačić, Deep learning with coherent nanophotonic circuits, Nat. Photonics 11, 441 (2017)

  22. [22]

    D. Dai, C. Li, S. Wang, H. Wu, Y . Shi, Z. Wu, S. Gao, T. Dai, H. Yu, and H. K. Tsang, 10‐channel mode (de)multiplexer with dual polarizations, Laser Photon. Rev. 12, 1700109 (2017)

  23. [23]

    Y . Wang, W. Liu, Z. Ji, G. Modi, M. Hwang, and R. Agarwal, Coherent interactions in one- dimensional topological photonic systems and their applications in all-optical logic operation, Nano Lett. 20, 8796 (2020)

  24. [24]

    Bogaerts and L

    W. Bogaerts and L. Chrostowski, Silicon photonics circuit design: Methods, tools, and challenges, Laser Photon. Rev. 12, 1700237 (2018)

  25. [25]

    W. Song, T. Li, S. Wu, Z. Wang, C. Chen, Y . Chen, C. Huang, K. Qiu, S. Zhu, Y . Zou, and T. Li, Dispersionless coupling among optical waveguides by artificial gauge field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 053901 (2022)

  26. [26]

    P. Zhou, T. Li, Y . Lin, L. Xia, L. Shen, X. Xu, T. Li, and Y . Zou, Artificial gauge field enabled low‐ crosstalk, broadband, half‐wavelength pitched waveguide arrays, Laser Photon. Rev. 17, 2200944 (2023)

  27. [27]

    W. Song, Y . Chen, H. Li, S. Gao, S. Wu, C. Chen, S. Zhu, and T. Li, Gauge-induced Floquet topological states in photonic waveguides, Laser Photon. Rev. 15, 2000584 (2021)

  28. [28]

    Jahani, S

    S. Jahani, S. Kim, J. Atkinson, J. C. Wirth, F. Kalhor, A. A. Noman, W. D. Newman, P. Shekhar, K. Han, V . Van, R. G. DeCorby, L. Chrostowski, M. Qi, and Z. Jacob, Controlling evanescent waves using silicon photonic all-dielectric metamaterials for dense integration, Nat. Commun. 9, 1893 (2018)

  29. [29]

    M. B. Mia, S. Z. Ahmed, I. Ahmed, Y . J. Lee, M. Qi, and S. Kim, Exceptional coupling in photonic anisotropic metamaterials for extremely low waveguide crosstalk, Optica 7, 881 (2020)

  30. [30]

    M. F. Kabir, M. B. Mia, I. Ahmed, N. Jaidye, S. Z. Ahmed, and S. Kim, Anisotropic leaky-like perturbation with subwavelength gratings enables zero crosstalk, Light Sci. Appl. 12, 135 (2023)

  31. [31]

    T. Song, H. Chu, J. Luo, Z. Cao, M. Xiao, R. Peng, M. Wang, and Y . Lai, Ultracompact photonic circuits without cladding layers, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011053 (2022)

  32. [32]

    X. Li, Q. Chen, L. Bai, W. Li, F. Chen, Y . Ren, Y . Pan, N. Han, M. Tong, L. Zhang, H. Chen, and Y . Yang, Cladding‐free on‐chip ultracompact photonic devices, Laser Photon. Rev. 19, 2402117 (2025)

  33. [33]

    W. Ji, J. Luo, T. Song, R. Peng, M. Wang, and Y . Lai, Cladding-free hyperbolic waveguide arrays, ACS Photonics 11, 2422 (2024). 15

  34. [34]

    M. Wang, R. Y . Zhang, L. Zhang, D. Wang, Q. Guo, Z. Q. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Topological one- way large-area waveguide states in magnetic photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 067401 (2021)

  35. [35]

    M. Wang, W. Zhou, L. Bi, C. Qiu, M. Ke, and Z. Liu, Valley-locked waveguide transport in acoustic heterostructures, Nat. Commun. 11, 3000 (2020)

  36. [36]

    Cheng, Y .-J

    Z. Cheng, Y .-J. Guan, H. Xue, Y . Ge, D. Jia, Y . Long, S.-Q. Yuan, H.-X. Sun, Y . Chong, and B. Zhang, Three-dimensional flat Landau levels in an inhomogeneous acoustic crystal, Nat. Commun. 15, 2174 (2024)

  37. [37]

    L. Du, Y . Liu, M. Li, X. Zhou, S. Wang, Q. Zhao, Z. Li, L. Tao, X. Xiao, K. Song, and X. Zhao, Dual-band large-area topological edge states and higher-order corner states in a valley hall photonic crystal, Phys. Rev. B 110, 155415 (2024)

  38. [38]

    J. Q. Wang, Z. D. Zhang, S. Y . Yu, H. Ge, K. F. Liu, T. Wu, X. C. Sun, L. Liu, H. Y . Chen, C. He, M. H. Lu, and Y . F. Chen, Extended topological valley-locked surface acoustic waves, Nat. Commun. 13, 1324 (2022)

  39. [39]

    Q. Chen, L. Zhang, F. Chen, Q. Yan, R. Xi, H. Chen, and Y . Yang, Photonic topological valley- locked waveguides, ACS Photonics 8, 1400 (2021)

  40. [40]

    H. Jia, R. Zhang, W. Gao, Q. Guo, B. Yang, J. Hu, Y . Bi, Y . Xiang, C. Liu, and S. Zhang, Observation of chiral zero mode in inhomogeneous three-dimensional Weyl metamaterials, Science 363, 148 (2019)

  41. [41]

    M. Yan, W. Deng, X. Huang, Y . Wu, Y . Yang, J. Lu, F. Li, and Z. Liu, Pseudomagnetic fields enabled manipulation of on-chip elastic waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 136401 (2021)

  42. [42]

    Kiriushechkina, A

    S. Kiriushechkina, A. Vakulenko, D. Smirnova, S. Guddala, Y . Kawaguchi, F. Komissarenko, M. Allen, J. Allen, and A. B. Khanikaev, Spin-dependent properties of optical modes guided by adiabatic trapping potentials in photonic Dirac metasurfaces, Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 875 (2023)

  43. [43]

    K. Chen, F. Komissarenko, D. Smirnova, A. Vakulenko, S. Kiriushechkina, I. V olkovskaya, S. Guddala, V . Menon, A. Alu, and A. B. Khanikaev, Photonic Dirac cavities with spatially varying mass term, Sci. Adv. 9, eabq4243 (2023)

  44. [44]

    Z. Yang, F. Gao, Y . Yang, and B. Zhang, Strain-induced gauge field and Landau levels in acoustic structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 194301 (2017)

  45. [45]

    H. Jia, M. Wang, S. Ma, R. Y . Zhang, J. Hu, D. Wang, and C. T. Chan, Experimental realization of chiral Landau levels in two-dimensional Dirac cone systems with inhomogeneous effective mass, Light Sci. Appl. 12, 165 (2023)

  46. [46]

    Jin, Z.-G

    M.-C. Jin, Z.-G. Chen, M.-H. Lu, P. Zhan, and Y .-F. Chen, Flat Landau levels and interface states in two-dimensional photonic crystals with a nodal ring, Phys. Rev. B 109, 054108 (2024)

  47. [47]

    Y . Chen, Z. Lan, L. Fan, S. Liang, L. An, J. Zhu, and Z. Su, Realization of broadband ultrasonic chiral Landau levels in an elastic metamaterial, Phys. Rev. B 111, 184303 (2025)

  48. [48]

    F. Ding, J. Tang, X. Dai, and Y . Xiang, Valley modes separation of chiral Landau levels with in- plane synthetic gauge fields in gyromagnetic photonic crystals, Laser Photon. Rev. 20, e01170 (2025)

  49. [49]

    Abbaszadeh, A

    H. Abbaszadeh, A. Souslov, J. Paulose, H. Schomerus, and V . Vitelli, Sonic Landau levels and synthetic gauge fields in mechanical metamaterials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 195502 (2017)

  50. [50]

    M. Wang, Q. Ma, S. Liu, R. Y . Zhang, L. Zhang, M. Ke, Z. Liu, and C. T. Chan, Observation of boundary-induced chiral anomaly bulk states and their transport properties, Nat. Commun. 13, 5916 (2022)

  51. [51]

    Zhang, M.-H

    Z.-D. Zhang, M.-H. Lu, and Y .-F. Chen, Observation of free-boundary-induced chiral anomaly bulk 15 states in elastic twisted kagome metamaterials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 086302 (2024)

  52. [52]

    L. H. Wu and X. Hu, Scheme for achieving a topological photonic crystal by using dielectric material, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 223901 (2015)

  53. [53]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL inserted by publisher] for (1) derivation of chiral anomaly bulk states via the boundary matrix method; (2) valley-locked property of the CABSs; (3) band dispersions of CABSs with different numbers of layers; (4) multiple-channel cladding-free photonic waveguide array based on CABSs; (5) robustness of CABS against sharp b...

  54. [54]

    J. Lu, C. Qiu, S. Xu, Y . Ye, M. Ke, and Z. Liu, Dirac cones in two-dimensional artificial crystals for classical waves, Phys. Rev. B 89, 134302 (2014). 15 FIG. 1. Principles of two different types of cladding-free photonic waveguide arrays. (a) Left panel: Schematic of a conventional cladding-free photonic waveguide array, in which inter-channel crosstal...