Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 68 references

Altermagnetism without a long-range order

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Altermagnetic behavior can arise in low dimensions without any long-range order.

desk verdict Good question, wrong answer: the claimed finite-T 'altermagnetic liquid' transition breaks the continuous symmetry the authors admit is broken, so Mermin-Wagner kills it, and the nodal-line claim misses the actual zero set of their own γq. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.15954 v1 pith:ONDF7REN submitted 2026-07-17 cond-mat.str-el

V. E. Valiulin , A. V. Mikheyenkov , K. I. Kugel This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords AltermagnetismKugel–Khomskiimodelspin–pseudospincorrelationspin-orbitalliquidlow-dimensionalmagnetismexcitationspectrumcompositeorderparameterreentranttransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the Kugel–Khomskii model, which couples a spin and a pseudospin (orbital) subsystem, supports an 'altermagnetic paramagnet' phase in one and two dimensions. Beyond a critical intersubsystem exchange Kc(T), spin–pseudospin correlations become nonzero even though the average spin and pseudospin at every site remain zero. This matters because altermagnetism is usually tied to a spin-split band structure in a magnetically ordered state; here the same symmetry fingerprint—nodal lines in the excitation spectrum—appears without any long-range order. The transition is shown to leave observable traces in heat capacity and susceptibility, and in 1D the phase boundary is nonmonotonic, giving a reentrant transition.

What carries the argument

The rotation-invariant Green's function method (RGM), which self-consistently computes spin–spin and spin–pseudospin correlation functions in a spherically symmetric state where no spin or orbital direction is singled out. The central object is the composite bilinear m0=⟨S_i^z T_i^z⟩, which breaks SU(2)×SU(2) down to a diagonal subgroup; the lattice structure factor γ_q=½(cos q_x + cos q_y) controls the acoustic/optical splitting and vanishes along the diagonal, producing the nodal lines that identify the altermagnetic symmetry.

What would settle it

Perform an exact finite-temperature calculation (e.g., tensor-network or quantum Monte Carlo) of the 1D Kugel–Khomskii chain at temperatures near the predicted phase boundary; if m0 is zero for all T>0, the predicted transition is an artifact of the self-consistent approximation. In 2D, look for a sharp peak in heat capacity at Kc(T) in a candidate low-dimensional altermagnet.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a symmetric SU(2)×SU(2) spin–pseudospin model (J=I, K<0) on a square lattice or a linear chain, the paper claims that at any temperature there is a critical intersubsystem exchange Kc(T). For |K|>|Kc| the single-site spin–pseudospin correlator m0=⟨S_i^z T_i^z⟩ and the inter-site correlator mg become nonzero while all single-site averages ⟨S⟩=⟨T⟩ vanish. The excitation spectrum splits into acoustic and optical branches, with the splitting vanishing along the nodal lines qx=qy—a direct analogue of the altermagnetic condition ε↑(k)=ε↓(Rk). The transition resembles a second-order phase transition with a critical exponent around 0.3–0.5, and the composite quantity m0 plays the role of an orde

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the composite spin–pseudospin correlator m0 can acquire a nonzero value at finite temperature in one and two dimensions even though it breaks a continuous SU(2)×SU(2) symmetry—a regime where the Mermin–Wagner theorem normally forbids ordering, and the paper applies that theorem only to the individual spin and pseudospin averages.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Altermagnetic-type band splitting may persist above magnetic ordering temperatures or in systems where order is destroyed by fluctuations, as an 'altermagnetic liquid'.
  • The predicted heat-capacity peak and susceptibility jump give a direct experimental probe of the hidden composite order.
  • The acoustic/optical branch splitting, with the optical branch as a propagating 'altermagnon', could be observed by inelastic neutron or light scattering.
  • In 1D, temperature can induce and then destroy the entangled state (reentrant transition), a testable prediction for cold-atom or organic-chain realizations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If correct, this work expands altermagnetism from a band-structure property of ordered magnets to a broader symmetry-enforced correlational phenomenon, so 'altermagnetic paramagnets' may be found in frustrated and low-dimensional magnets with orbital degrees of freedom even where no magnetic order survives.
  • The composite order parameter m0 resembles a spin-orbital nematic order; a similar hidden order could be relevant in other multi-orbital compounds, though the paper does not make that connection.
  • The self-consistent approximation uses a fixed vertex correction (α=11); testing how the phase boundary shifts with α would clarify robustness, a step the paper does not take.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the SU(2)×SU(2) symmetric Kugel–Khomskii spin–pseudospin model on a square lattice and on a linear chain using the rotation-invariant Green's function method (RGM). With antiferromagnetic (J=I>0) intra-subsystem exchanges and negative inter-subsystem exchange K, the authors report that beyond a critical |K_c(T)| a composite state appears with nonzero on-site and nearest-neighbor spin–pseudospin correlations m0=⟨S_i^z T_i^z⟩ and mg=⟨S_i^z T_{i+g}^z⟩, while ⟨S_i⟩=⟨T_i⟩=0. They claim the excitation spectrum splits into acoustic and optical branches, with nodal lines along q_x=q_y interpreted as an altermagnetic signature, and that the heat capacity and susceptibility show features at the phase boundary. In 1D the phase boundary is reported to be nonmonotonic, implying a reentrant transition. The paper concludes that an 'altermagnetic paramagnet' or 'altermagnetic liquid' without long-range order exists in D=1,2.

Significance. If correct, the paper would establish a genuinely new equilibrium state in low-dimensional spin–orbital systems: a phase with altermagnetic-like symmetry signatures but with all conventional order parameters zero, accompanied by concrete thermodynamic predictions (heat-capacity peak, susceptibility jump) and a characteristic spectral nodal structure. The authors use a well-known approximate method, provide explicit correlation functions and spectra, and formulate falsifiable predictions for low-dimensional systems and cold-atom experiments. However, the central claim is subject to a fundamental symmetry restriction: the proposed composite order parameter m0 breaks a continuous symmetry, and the Mermin–Wagner theorem forbids such breaking at finite temperature in D≤2. Because the advertised phase rests on this transition, the significance of the result is not established by the present analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3, Eq. (2), Eq. (9); §4.1 and Fig. 5] The central order parameter m0=⟨S_i^z T_i^z⟩ is not invariant under the continuous symmetry of the Hamiltonian. Under a spin-only rotation by π about the y-axis, S_i^z→−S_i^z while T_i^z stays unchanged, so m0→−m0. A nonzero m0 in a translationally invariant state therefore spontaneously breaks SU(2)_S×SU(2)_T. The Mermin–Wagner theorem (Ref. [46]), which the paper cites, forbids spontaneous breaking of a continuous symmetry at T>0 for short-range interactions in D=1,2. The paper's statement that 'Mermin–Wagner holds explicitly' only enforces ⟨S_i⟩=⟨T_i⟩=0 (assumption ii); it does not protect the composite local order. Consequently the sharp onset of m0 and the phase boundaries in Fig. 5 are symmetry-broken mean-field-type artifacts of the RGM decoupling, not equilibrium finite-T transitions. This invalidates the main claim of an 'altermagnetic liquid' in D=1,2.
  2. [Abstract, §4.3, and Appendix (γ_q definition)] The nodal-line claim is internally inconsistent. The structure factor is γ_q = ½(cos q_x + cos q_y). The condition cos q_x + cos q_y = 0 defines the line q_x+q_y=π, not the diagonal q_x=q_y. Along q_x=q_y=q, γ_q=cos q, which vanishes only at the isolated point q=π/2. The text states 'nodal lines along q_x = q_y' and later says 'at the nodal lines cos(qx)+cos(qy) (i.e., along the Brillouin zone diagonal q=(q,q))' — these statements contradict the formula. Since these nodal directions are presented as the direct signature of altermagnetic symmetry, this is a load-bearing error.
  3. [§4.4 and Appendix (α_ST and Tc fit)] The quantitative phase boundary Tc≈0.55|K|^0.55 is presented as an empirical fit to the numerical self-consistent curve, not a derived relation. The vertex correction α_ST=11 is introduced without independent justification; the footnote claiming that moderate changes of α do not change results qualitatively is not supported by a sensitivity analysis. In light of the Mermin–Wagner problem above, the numerical transition and the reentrant 1D boundary cannot be regarded as robust predictions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3, after Eq. (5)] The text says 'standard RGB algorithm'; this should be 'RGM' (rotation-invariant Green's function) algorithm.
  2. [Appendix, Eq. (24)] In the second term of Eq. (24), '̃m_o' appears where '̃m_0' is intended (compare Eq. (18)).
  3. [Fig. 4] The axes labels 'qyqx' are not properly formatted; they should be separated (q_x, q_y) for readability.
  4. [§1, last paragraph] The phrase 'a microscopic model of an antiferromagnetic liquid' seems to conflict with the terminology 'altermagnetic liquid' used throughout; please clarify the intended distinction.
  5. [Data availability] The statement 'No data was used for the research described in the article' is surprising given the numerical self-consistent solutions and figures; consider clarifying that the figures are generated from in-house numerical calculations and are available from the authors.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the composite-order transition is a self-consistent output, not an input; self-citations and parameter choices do not reduce the central claim to its assumptions.

full rationale

The paper's central result—the finite-temperature onset of nonzero on-site and inter-site spin–pseudospin correlations m0 = ⟨S_i^z T_i^z⟩ and mg = ⟨S_i^z T_{i+g}^z⟩—is obtained by numerically solving the RGM self-consistency equations, not by inserting the target value as an input. The Appendix gives explicit spectral formulas containing M = 8Km0 (2D) and M = 4Km0 (1D), and the nonzero solution appears only beyond Kc(T); it is not set by hand. The thermodynamic signatures (heat-capacity peak, susceptibility jump) are derived consequences of that self-consistent solution, so they are not a fitted input renamed as prediction. The self-citations (e.g., [47], [58], [34], [37]) supply the RGM decoupling approximation and prior validation, but the target claim is not asserted by those citations, and the 1D comparison is also backed by independent Bethe-ansatz references [62–64]. The arbitrary vertex correction α = 11 is an unsupported modeling choice, and the claim that the Mermin–Wagner theorem is respected is physically questionable because a nonzero composite order parameter m0 itself transforms under the continuous SU(2)×SU(2) symmetry—but this is a correctness risk, not a circular reduction. Similarly, the nodal-line claim (qx = qy) is mathematically inconsistent with the paper's own γ_q = (cos qx + cos qy)/2, whose zero set is qx + qy = π; this is an internal error, not an equivalence between a prediction and an input. No central equation reduces to an assumption by construction, and no fitted parameter is presented as a prediction, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the RGM approximation with a specific decoupling and a hand-set vertex correction α=11. The claimed nodal-line signature is inconsistent with the derived γ_q. The finite-T transition to m0≠0 in D=1,2 would break a continuous symmetry, raising a Mermin–Wagner concern that is not addressed.

free parameters (2)
  • vertex correction α_ST = 11
    Adopted ad hoc in Appendix (footnote 1) for both on-site and inter-site spin-pseudospin vertex corrections; affects the self-consistent equations and thus the existence and location of the transition.
  • phase boundary coefficients for Tc = 0.55|K|^0.55 = prefactor 0.55, exponent 0.55
    Reported in §4.4 as 'well described by' — a fit to the numerically computed 2D phase boundary, not derived from the model.
assumptions (3)
  • ad hoc to paper RGM decoupling approximation from ref [58] for the K term
    The central approximation in §3; its accuracy for the spin-pseudospin sector near the critical point is not benchmarked.
  • domain assumption Assumption of no LRO and all sites equivalent (Eq. (2)-(3))
    §3 assumptions i-iii; reasonable for D=1,2 at T>0, but combined with nonzero m0 implies symmetry breaking that Mermin–Wagner forbids.
  • standard math Mermin–Wagner theorem
    Invoked in §3 to justify no LRO; but the paper does not apply it to the composite order parameter m0.
invented entities (2)
  • Altermagnetic liquid / altermagnetic paramagnet
    purpose: A proposed equilibrium phase with nonzero spin-pseudospin correlations and altermagnetic excitation spectrum without long-range order
    Defined in abstract and conclusions; no falsifiable prediction independent of the RGM calculation; proposed cold-atom/organic-chain tests are not specific.
  • Altermagnon
    purpose: A collective spin-orbital excitation (optical branch) in the disordered state
    Predicted mode; no independent handle or observable signature quantified beyond the approximate spectrum.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Altermagnetism without a long-range order." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ONDF7REN

@misc{pith2026260715954,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Altermagnetism without a long-range order},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ONDF7REN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.15954}
}
read the original abstract

The Kugel-Khomskii spin-pseudospin model, originally developed for transition-metal compounds with orbital degrees of freedom, has recently been reinterpreted in the context of altermagnetism. In this work, we theoretically investigate the emergence of altermagnetic behavior in the absence of long-range magnetic or orbital order. Using the rotation-invariant Green's function method for the SU(2) x SU(2) symmetric model on a square lattice and on a linear chain, we analyze spin-spin and spin-pseudospin correlation functions, excitation spectra, heat capacity, and susceptibilities. We show that beyond a critical intersubsystem exchange Kc(T), a composite state arises with nonzero spin-pseudospin correlations, even though the average spin and pseudospin at each site are zero. The excitation spectrum splits into acoustic and optical branches, with nodal lines along qx = qy - a direct signature of altermagnetic symmetry. A peak in heat capacity and a jump in susceptibility are observed at the phase boundary. In 1D, the phase boundary is nonmonotonic and demonstrates reentrant transition. These results establish the concept of an "altermagnetic paramagnet" or "altermagnetic liquid" without long-range order, relevant for low-dimensional and strongly fluctuating systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15954 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (Color online) Dependence of the spin–spin correlation function 𝑐𝑔 at nearest neighbors and of the spin–pseudospin on-site 𝑚0 and inter-site 𝑚𝑔 correlation functions on 𝑇 and on the inter￾subsystem exchange 𝐾. The curves forming the “platypus nose” are 𝑚0 (𝑚0 < 0) and 𝑚𝑔 (𝑚𝑔 > 0). The numbers 1 ÷ 8 enumerate the temperature values: 1 – 𝑇 = 0.1, 2 – 𝑇 = 0.2, etc. The lower curves correspond to 𝑐𝑔 (the limits of 𝑇 are… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (Color online) 2D lattice. Susceptibility as a function of temperature 𝑇 at the fixed inter-subsystem exchange 𝐾. The dashed line corresponds to the spin–spin susceptibility 𝜒𝑠𝑠 and the solid line – to the spin–pseudospin susceptibility 𝜒𝑠𝑡. Colors correspond to different values of 𝐾. interaction |𝐾|. Near the transition, at |𝐾| ≳ |𝐾𝑐 |, the spectral splitting is small and noticeable only in the vicinity of the high… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. (Color online) Spectra of elementary excitations 𝜔𝑎𝑐 (𝐪) and 𝜔𝑜𝑝𝑡(𝐪) (17) at 𝑇 = 0.3. Top: 𝐾 = −0.4, weak splitting. Bottom: 𝐾 = −3.0, strong splitting. In the second case, the upper regions of the spectral branches form a nearly dispersionless region. A quarter of the Brillouin zone is shown. For any 𝑇 and 𝐾 at the symmetrical points 𝚪 = (0, 0) and 𝐐 = (𝜋, 𝜋) in the Brillouin zone 𝜔𝑜𝑝𝑡(𝚪) ≥ 𝜔𝑎𝑐 (𝚪) = 0 and 𝜔𝑎𝑐 (𝐐) … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (Color online) Phase diagram - regions with zero and nonzero spin–pseudospin correlations are presented. The blue curve is the phase boundary in 1𝐷 and the red curve – in 2𝐷. Figs. 1, 2, and 3 have a more complicated shape, and we will not present them here. In the con…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [46]

    N. D. Mermin, H. Wagner, Absence of Ferromagnetism or Anti- ferromagnetism in One- or Two-Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17 (1966) 1133–1136

    1966

  2. [1]

    K.I.Kugel,D.I.Khomskii, Crystalstructureandmagneticproperties of substances with orbital degeneracy, Sov. Phys. JETP 37 (1973) 725–730

    1973

  3. [2]

    K. I. Kugel, D. I. Khomskii, The Jahn-Teller effect and magnetism: transition metal compounds, Sov. Phys. Usp. 25 (1982) 231

    1982

  4. [3]

    S. V. Streltsov, D. I. Khomskii, Orbital physics in transition metal compounds: new trends, Phys. Usp. 60 (2017) 1121–1146

    2017

  5. [4]

    van den Brink, W

    J. van den Brink, W. Stekelenburg, D. I. Khomskii, G. A. Sawatzky, K.I.Kugel, Elementaryexcitationsinthecoupledspin-orbitalmodel, Phys. Rev. B 58 (1998) 10276–10282. 1Extensive experience of RGM approach in various spin/pseudospin models (see Refs. in Sec.3) shows that manipulating vertex corrections withinreasonablelimitsdoesnotleadtoaqualitativechangein...

    1998

  6. [5]

    Saitoh, S

    E. Saitoh, S. Okamoto, K. T. Takahashi, K. Tobe, K. Yamamoto, T.Kimura,S.Ishihara,S.Maekawa,Y.Tokura,Observationoforbital waves as elementary excitations in a solid, Nature 410 (2001) 180– 183

    2001

  7. [6]

    van den Brink, Orbital excitations in LaMnO3, Phys

    J. van den Brink, Orbital excitations in LaMnO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 217202

    2001

  8. [7]

    Ishihara, Y

    S. Ishihara, Y. Murakami, T. Inami, K. Ishii, J. Mizuki, K. Hirota, S. Maekawa, Y. Endoh, Theory and experiment of orbital excitations in correlated oxides, New J. Phys. 7 (2005) 119–119

    2005

Show all 68 references
  1. [8]

    J.Schlappa,K.Wohlfeld,K.J.Zhou,M.Mourigal,M.W.Haverkort, V. N. Strocov, L. Hozoi, C. Monney, S. Nishimoto, S. Singh, A. Revcolevschi, J.-S. Caux, L. Patthey, H. M. Rønnow, J. van den Brink, T. Schmitt, Spin-orbital separation in the quasi-one- dimensional Mott insulator Sr2CuO...

    2012

  2. [9]

    Wohlfeld, Propagation of an orbiton in the antiferromagnets: theory and experimental verification, arXiv:cond-mat/1912.11363 (2019)

    K. Wohlfeld, Propagation of an orbiton in the antiferromagnets: theory and experimental verification, arXiv:cond-mat/1912.11363 (2019)

    1912 arXiv

  3. [10]

    J. Li, L. Xu, M. Garcia-Fernandez, A. Nag, H. C. Robarts, A. C. Walters, X. Liu, J. Zhou, K. Wohlfeld, J. van den Brink, H. Ding, K.- J. Zhou, Unraveling the orbital physics in a canonical orbital system KCuF3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 106401

    2021

  4. [11]

    Martinelli, K

    L. Martinelli, K. Wohlfeld, J. Pelliciari, R. Arpaia, N. B. Brookes, D.DiCastro,M.G.Fernandez,M.Kang,Y.Krockenberger,K.Kum- mer, D. E. McNally, E. Paris, T. Schmitt, H. Yamamoto, A. Walters, K.-J. Zhou, L. Braicovich, R. Comin, M. M. Sala, T. P. Devereaux, M.Daghofer,G.Ghiring...

    2024

  5. [12]

    C. Ji, K. Chen, Q. Chen, C.-K. Duan, Spin-orbital altermagnetism in strongly-correlated fluoroperovskites, Phys. Rev. B (2026)

    2026

  6. [13]

    F. Wang, A. Vishwanath,𝑍 2 spin-orbital liquid state in the square lattice Kugel-Khomskii model, Phys. Rev. B 80 (2009) 064413

    2009

  7. [14]

    J.Zaanen,L.F.Feiner,A.M.Oles, Classicalfrustrationandquantum disorder in spin-orbital models, arXiv:cond-mat/9811075 (1998)

    1998 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Corboz, M

    P. Corboz, M. Lajkó, A. M. Läuchli, K. Penc, F. Mila, Spin-Orbital Quantum Liquid on the Honeycomb Lattice, Phys. Rev. X 2 (2012) 041013

    2012

  9. [16]

    M.G.Yamada,M.Oshikawa,G.Jackeli,𝑆𝑈(4)-symmetricquantum spin-orbital liquids on various lattices, Phys. Rev. B 104 (2021) 224436

    2021

  10. [17]

    G. V. Chen, C. Wu, Multiflavor mott insulators in quantum materials and ultracold atoms, npj Quantum Mater. 9 (2024)

    2024

  11. [18]

    V.Gorshkov, M.Hermele, V.Gurarie, C.Xu, P.S

    A. V.Gorshkov, M.Hermele, V.Gurarie, C.Xu, P.S. Julienne,J. Ye, P. Zoller, E. Demler, M. D. Lukin, A. M. Rey, Two-orbital𝑆𝑈(𝑁) magnetism with ultracold alkaline-earth atoms, Nat. Phys. 6 (2010) 289–295

    2010

  12. [19]

    A. M. Belemuk, N. M. Chtchelkatchev, A. V. Mikheyenkov, K. I. Kugel, Magnetic phase diagram and quantum phase transitions in a two-species boson model, Phys. Rev. B 96 (2017) 094435

    2017

  13. [20]

    A. M. Belemuk, N. M. Chtchelkatchev, A. V. Mikheyenkov, K. I. Kugel, Quantum phase transitions and the degree of nonidentity in the system with two different species of vector bosons, New J. Phys. 20 (2018) 063039

    2018

  14. [21]

    Y.Chen,Z.D.Wang,Y.Q.Li,F.C.Zhang,Spin-orbitalentanglement and quantum phase transitions in a spin-orbital chain with𝑆𝑈(2) × 𝑆𝑈(2)symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 75 (2007) 195113

    2007

  15. [22]

    W.Brzezicki,A.M.Oleś, Entangledspin-orbitalphasesinthebilayer Kugel-Khomskii model, Phys. Rev. B 83 (2011) 214408

    2011

  16. [23]

    W.Brzezicki,J.Dziarmaga,A.M.Oleś, Noncollinearmagneticorder stabilizedbyentangledspin-orbitalfluctuations, Phys.Rev.Lett.109 (2012) 237201

    2012

  17. [24]

    W.Brzezicki,A.M.Oleś, Spin-OrbitalEntanglementEmergingfrom Frustration in the Kugel-Khomskii Model, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 391 (2012) 012085

    2012

  18. [25]

    A. M. Oleś, Fingerprints of spin-orbital entanglement in transition metal oxides, J Phys.: Condens Matter 24 (2012) 313201

    2012

  19. [26]

    R.Lundgren,V.Chua,G.A.Fiete, Entanglemententropyandspectra of the one-dimensional Kugel-Khomskii model, Phys. Rev. B 86 First Author et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 7 of 8 Altermagnetism without a long-range order (2012) 224422

    2012

  20. [27]

    W.-L. You, A. M. Oleś, P. Horsch, von neumann entropy spectra and entangled excitations in spin-orbital models, Phys. Rev. B 86 (2012) 094412

    2012

  21. [28]

    Zlatic, A

    A.M.Oleś,Spin-OrbitalEntangledStatesinTransitionMetalOxides, in: V. Zlatic, A. Hewson (Eds.), New Materials for Thermoelectric Applications: Theory and Experiment, Springer Netherlands, Dor- drecht, 2013, pp. 219–245

    2013

  22. [29]

    Brzezicki, J

    W. Brzezicki, J. Dziarmaga, A. Oleś, Topological order in an entangled𝑆𝑈(2) ×𝑋𝑌spin-orbitalring, Phys.Rev.Lett.112(2014) 117204

    2014

  23. [30]

    W.-L. You, P. Horsch, A. Oleś, Quantum entanglement in the one- dimensional spin-orbital𝑆𝑈(2) ×𝑋𝑋𝑍model, Phys. Rev. B 92 (2015)

    2015

  24. [31]

    H. Man, M. Halim, H. Sawa, M. Hagiwara, Y. Wakabayashi, S. Nakatsuji, Spin-orbital entangled liquid state in the copper oxide Ba3CuSb2O9, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 30 (2018) 443002

    2018

  25. [32]

    D.Gotfryd,E.Pärschke,K.Wohlfeld,A.M.Oleś, EvolutionofSpin- Orbital Entanglement with Increasing Ising Spin-Orbit Coupling, Condensed Matter 5 (2020) 53

    2020

  26. [33]

    Gotfryd, E

    D. Gotfryd, E. M. Pärschke, J. Chaloupka, A. M. Oleś, K. Wohlfeld, Howspin-orbitalentanglementdependsonthespin-orbitcouplingin a Mott insulator, Phys. Rev. R 2 (2020) 013353

    2020

  27. [34]

    V.E.Valiulin,A.V.Mikheyenkov,N.M.Chtchelkatchev,K.I.Kugel, Quantum entanglement, local indicators, and the effect of external fieldsintheKugel-Khomskiimodel,Phys.Rev.B102(2020)155125

    2020

  28. [35]

    Pandey, Y

    B. Pandey, Y. Zhang, N. Kaushal, R. Soni, L.-F. Lin, W.-J. Hu, G. Alvarez, E. Dagotto, Origin of the magnetic and orbital ordering in𝛼-Sr 2CrO4, Phys. Rev. B 103 (2021) 045115

    2021

  29. [36]

    Mohapatra, D

    S. Mohapatra, D. Kumar Singh, R. Ray, S. Ghosh, A. Singh, Spin- orbit coupling, orbitally entangled antiferromagnetic order, and col- lective spin-orbital excitations in Sr2VO4, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 35 (2022) 045801

    2022

  30. [37]

    V.E.Valiulin,A.V.Mikheyenkov,N.M.Chtchelkatchev,K.I.Kugel, TheresistanceofquantumentanglementtotemperatureintheKugel- Khomskii model, SciPost Physics Core 6 (2023) 025

    2023

  31. [38]

    Camerano, A

    L. Camerano, A. O. Fumega, J. L. Lado, A. Stroppa, G. Profeta, Multiferroic nematic d-wave altermagnetism driven by orbital-order on the honeycomb lattice, npj 2D Mater. Appl. 9 (2025) 75

    2025

  32. [39]

    d’Ornellas, V

    P. d’Ornellas, V. Leeb, A. G. Grushin, J. Knolle, Altermagnetism without crystal symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 113 (2026) 024426

    2026

  33. [40]

    Kaushal, A

    N. Kaushal, A. S. Patri, M. Franz, Spontaneous altermagnetism in multi-orbital correlated electron systems, 2026

    2026

  34. [41]

    N.Sicheler,R.Raimondi,G.Sangiovanni,L.D.Re,Opticallytunable spin transport in bilayer altermagnetic mott insulators, 2025

    2025

  35. [42]

    M.Daghofer,K.Wohlfeld,J.vandenBrink,Altermagneticpolarons: the fate of alter magnetic band splittings at strong coupling, 2025

    2025

  36. [43]

    Q.N.Meier,A.Carta,C.Ederer,A.Cano,(anti-)altermagnetismfrom orbitalorderingintheRuddlesden-PopperchromatesSr 𝑛+1Cr𝑛O3𝑛+1, 2025

    2025

  37. [44]

    M. Vila, V. Sunko, J. E. Moore, Orbital-spin locking and its optical signatures in altermagnets, 2024

    2024

  38. [45]

    S.K.Pati,R.R.P.Singh,D.I.Khomskii, Alternatingspinandorbital dimerizationandspin-gapformationincoupledspin-orbitalsystems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 5406–5409

    1998

  39. [47]

    A.F.Barabanov,V.E.Valiulin,A.V.Mikheyenkov,P.S.Savchenkov, Sphericallysymmetricapproachesinthelow-dimensionalmagnetism theory, Phys. Usp. 69 (2026)

    2026

  40. [48]

    Härtel, J

    M. Härtel, J. Richter, D. Ihle, J. Schnack, S.-L. Drechsler, Thermo- dynamics of the one-dimensional frustrated Heisenberg ferromagnet with arbitrary spin, Phys. Rev. B 84 (2011) 104411

    2011

  41. [49]

    A. F. Barabanov, A. V. Mikheyenkov, A. V. Shvartsberg, Frustrated quantum two-dimensional𝐽 1 −𝐽 2 −𝐽 3 antiferromagnet in a spher- ically symmetric self-consistent approach, Theor. Math. Phys. 168 (2011) 1192–1215

    2011

  42. [50]

    Sherman, M

    A. Sherman, M. Schreiber, Low-frequency magnetic response in the pseudogapphaseofcuprateperovskites,JournalofSuperconductivity and Novel Magnetism 25 (2012) 1833–1841

    2012

  43. [51]

    A. V. Mikheyenkov, A. V. Shvartsberg, A. F. Barabanov, Phase transitions in the 2D𝐽1 −𝐽 2 Heisenberg model with arbitrary signs of exchange interactions, JETP Lett. 98 (2013) 156–160

    2013

  44. [52]

    Härtel, J

    M. Härtel, J. Richter, O. Götze, D. Ihle, S.-L. Drechsler, Thermody- namics of the two-dimensional frustrated𝐽1 −𝐽 2 Heisenberg ferro- magnet in the collinear stripe regime: Susceptibility and correlation length, Phys. Rev. B 87 (2013) 054412

    2013

  45. [53]

    A. V. Mikheyenkov, A. V. Shvartsberg, V. E. Valiulin, A. F. Bara- banov, Thermodynamic properties of the 2D frustrated Heisenberg model for the entire circle, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 419 (2016) 131– 139

    2016

  46. [54]

    V. E. Valiulin, A. V. Mikheyenkov, N. M. Chtchelkatchev, A. F. Barabanov, Continuous transformation between ferro and antiferro circular structures in𝐽1 −𝐽 2 −𝐽 3 frustrated heisenberg model, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 31 (2019) 455801

    2019

  47. [55]

    Muller, A

    P. Muller, A. Lohmann, J. Richter, O. Derzhko, Thermodynamics of the pyrochlore-lattice quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 100 (2019) 024424

    2019

  48. [56]

    P. S. Savchenkov, A. F. Barabanov, Spectral characteristics of the antiferromagnetic spin-1/2 Heisenberg model on the square lattice in a magnetic field, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 521 (2021) 167505

    2021

  49. [57]

    Hutak, T

    T. Hutak, T. Krokhmalskii, O. Derzhko, J. Richter, Spin-half Heisenbergantiferromagnetonasymmetricsawtoothchain:rotation- invariantGreen’sfunctionsandhigh-temperatureseries, Eur.Phys.J. B 96 (2023) 50

    2023

  50. [58]

    M. Y. Kagan, K. I. Kugel, A. V. Mikheyenkov, A. F. Barabanov, Elementary excitations in the symmetric spin-orbital model, JETP Letters 100 (2014) 187–191

    2014

  51. [59]

    Shimahara, S

    H. Shimahara, S. Takada, Green’s function theory of the two- dimensional Heisenberg model-spin wave in short range order, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 60 (1991) 2394–2405

    1991

  52. [60]

    Z. Liu, M. Ozeki, S. Asai, S. Itoh, T. Masuda, Chiral split magnon in altermagnetic mnte, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 156702

    2024

  53. [61]

    Gauswami, P

    A. Gauswami, P. K. Jha, Strain-controlled chiral magnons and spin- dependent seebeck effect in tetragonal𝛽-MnO2 altermagnet: a DFT study, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 38 (2026) 025802

    2026

  54. [62]

    F.Suzuki,N.Shimata,C.Ishii, Thermodynamicsoflow-dimensional Heisenberg ferromagnets by the Green’s function method, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 63 (1994) 1539–1547

    1994

  55. [63]

    I.Junger,D.Ihle,J.Richter,A.Klümper,Green-functiontheoryofthe Heisenberg ferromagnet in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 70 (2004) 104419

    2004

  56. [64]

    Härtel, J

    M. Härtel, J. Richter, D. Ihle, S.-L. Drechsler, Thermodynamics of aone-dimensionalfrustratedspin-1/2Heisenbergferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 78 (2008) 174412

    2008

  57. [65]

    Dajka, M

    J. Dajka, M. Mierzejewski, J. Łuczka, Non-Markovian entanglement evolution of two uncoupled qubits, Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008) 042316

    2008

  58. [66]

    Seidelmann, F

    T. Seidelmann, F. Ungar, A. Barth, A. Vagov, V. Axt, M. Cygorek, T. Kuhn, Phonon-Induced Enhancement of Photon Entanglement in Quantum Dot-Cavity Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 137401

    2019

  59. [67]

    Z. Wang, W. Wu, J. Wang, Steady-state entanglement and coherence of two coupled qubits in equilibrium and nonequilibrium environ- ments, Phys. Rev. A 99 (2019) 042320

    2019

  60. [68]

    Ghannadan, J

    A. Ghannadan, J. Strečka, Magnetic-Field-Orientation Dependent Thermal Entanglement of a Spin-1 Heisenberg Dimer: The Case Study of Dinuclear Nickel Complex with an Uniaxial Single-Ion Anisotropy, Molecules 26 (2021) 3420. First Author et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 8 of 8

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.