Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 114 references

The impact of the transport of chemicals and electronic screening on helioseismic and neutrino observations in solar models

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The main differences between two solar evolution codes trace to a 1.5 percent opacity gap, and a screening-inspired 5 percent cut to nuclear rates reshapes neutrino fluxes without fixing the CNO deficit.

desk verdict A careful two-code solar model comparison with one genuinely new attribution result (opacity interpolation), but the electronic-screening conclusion overreaches because the implemented 5% rate reduction is not the pp-chain-specific correction it is compared against. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.12335 v1 pith:ONSPGERY submitted 2025-07-16 astro-ph.SR

Morgan Deal , Gaël Buldgen , Louis Manchon , Yveline Lebreton , Arlette Noels , Richard Scuflaire This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords atomicdiffusionsolarmodellinghelioseismologyneutrinofluxeselectronicscreeningopacityinterpolationconvectiveenvelopeabundances
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tests how choices inside stellar evolution codes change predictions for the Sun, using the Sun's helioseismic and neutrino observations as arbiter. It compares two codes that share most input physics and finds that the largest remaining difference is not from atomic diffusion, turbulent mixing, or convection, but from opacity: at fixed density, temperature, and composition, one code returns opacities 1.5 percent larger than the other, shifting the base of the convective envelope and the predicted neutrino fluxes. The paper also takes a 5 percent uniform reduction of nuclear reaction efficiencies as a proxy for dynamical electronic screening and shows that it substantially changes neutrino fluxes while leaving CNO fluxes below the Borexino measurements and worsening the helioseismic agreement. The upshot is that code-level implementation details matter at solar precision, and electronic screening is an important uncertainty but not by itself the fix for the solar modelling problem.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing comparison is a controlled code-to-code test: the authors take fixed thermodynamic coordinates and chemical composition from one code, call the equation-of-state and opacity routines of the other, and isolate the 1.5 percent opacity difference. That difference, rather than the transport physics under study, explains the shifts in the convective envelope and neutrino fluxes. The screening analysis is carried by a simpler mechanism: a uniform 5 percent reduction of all nuclear reaction efficiencies, applied while keeping weak screening active, used as a proxy for dynamical screening corrections recommended in the literature.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be to run both codes with a genuine per-reaction dynamical screening treatment instead of the flat 5 percent cut and check whether the CNO neutrino fluxes rise to the Borexino value and whether the helioseismic sound-speed agreement improves or worsens. A second check would have the two codes read the same opacity table through the other's interpolation routine to locate the exact source of the 1.5 percent opacity gap.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the main differences between CLES and Cesam2k20 solar models come from the slightly different treatment of opacities in the two codes. In a direct test, for chosen density, temperature, and chemical composition, the CLES opacity routine returned a value 1.5 percent larger than Cesam2k20, and installing the same opacity table and interpolation method in Cesam2k20 removed a large part of the structural differences, including the position of the base of the convective envelope. The paper further finds that the choice of atomic diffusion formalism has minor helioseismic impact, that turbulent mixing can reproduce lithium and beryllium depletion but degrades inversion agreement, and that reducing all nuclear reaction efficiencies by 5 percent—the recommended proxy for dynamical electronic screening—significantly raises predicted neutrino fluxes but leaves CNO fluxes below the Borexino measurements and worsens the sound-speed agreement. The authors conclude that electronic screening is an important ingredient for accurate solar models, but that it does not reconcile the models with the observed CNO fluxes.

Load-bearing premise

The screening conclusions rest on treating dynamical screening as a flat 5 percent reduction of all nuclear reaction efficiencies, even though the paper itself notes that screening is thought to matter more for the CNO cycle than for the pp chain.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At the precision of solar data, opacity table interpolation details are as influential as some physical processes, so code comparisons must control them before attributing differences to transport or screening.
  • None of the atomic diffusion formalisms tested is decisively favoured by sound-speed or Ledoux-discriminant inversions, even though tracking individual elements remains preferable on physical grounds.
  • Turbulent mixing can match the observed lithium and beryllium depletion, with a sharp density dependence needed to preserve beryllium, but it does not significantly improve the helioseismic fit.
  • A 5 percent reduction of nuclear rates, the adopted dynamical-screening proxy, substantially alters all predicted neutrino fluxes and worsens the sound-speed agreement, so screening-based improvements to neutrino fluxes come at a helioseismic cost.
  • With the low-metallicity solar abundance mixture used throughout, both codes produce CNO neutrino fluxes below the Borexino measurements, confirming the known deficit in standard solar models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 1.5 percent opacity gap is generic to currently available interpolation schemes, then other published solar model comparisons that use different opacity routines may contain similar hidden offsets; re-analysing past comparisons with a common opacity module would test this.
  • Because the paper's screening proxy applies a flat 5 percent cut while noting that screening should be stronger for CNO reactions, a reaction-by-reaction dynamical screening implementation might change CNO fluxes more than pp fluxes and deserves a dedicated implementation in both codes.
  • The same code-comparison approach could be applied to other Sun-like stars targeted by future asteroseismic surveys, where 1 percent differences in thermodynamic quantities are no longer negligible.
  • The opacity test suggests that helioseismic determinations of the solar metal mass fraction or of the solar radiative opacity may be sensitive to the interpolation routine, so opacity table interpolation uncertainty should be quantified in opacity-inference studies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper compares solar models computed with two stellar evolution codes, CLES and Cesam2k20, across a range of physical prescriptions: different atomic diffusion formalisms (T94, MP93, Burgers), radiative accelerations, ad hoc turbulent mixing models (R00 and PM91), convection treatments (MLT, CGM, ECM), and modifications to nuclear screening and reaction efficiencies. The authors calibrate each model to the solar radius, luminosity, and surface Z/X, and for turbulent-mixing models also to the lithium abundance. They then evaluate helioseismic agreement via SOLA inversions of sound speed and Ledoux discriminant, and compare predicted neutrino fluxes with Borexino measurements. The main quantitative claim is that the residual differences between the two codes—such as the position of the convective envelope base and core temperature gradients—are largely attributable to a ~1.5% difference in the opacity interpolation, demonstrated by swapping the same opacity tables and interpolation method into Cesam2k20. A secondary claim is that reducing all nuclear reaction efficiencies by 5% as a proxy for dynamical electronic screening significantly changes neutrino fluxes and worsens helioseismic agreement, which is contrasted with the slight improvement reported by Mussack and Däppen (2011).

Significance. The paper is a careful and useful code-comparison study for the solar modeling community. Its main strength is the controlled opacity test: swapping the same opacity table and interpolation method into Cesam2k20 directly isolates the source of the code-to-code differences, and this experiment is well designed. The comparisons of atomic diffusion formalisms are also systematically controlled and use external helioseismic and Borexino data that are not part of the calibration, which gives the results independence. The turbulent-mixing calibrations to the lithium abundance are acknowledged as such, and the beryllium diagnostic adds a useful additional constraint. If the opacity attribution and the screening sensitivity results hold, the paper provides valuable guidance for interpreting precision solar models. However, the screening conclusion is weakened by an inconsistency in what the 5% reduction actually modifies, and this affects one of the paper's stated contributions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.4 vs Section 5, Figure 5] The paper states in Section 2.4 that the 5% reduction is applied 'to all nuclear reactions,' but Section 5 and Figure 5 describe the test as a '5% modification of the pp chain reaction.' This inconsistency is load-bearing because Mussack and Däppen (2011) specifically derived a dynamical screening correction for the pp chain, not a uniform reduction of all rates. Reducing the CNO cycle rates as well, especially 14N(p,γ)15O, changes the CNO neutrino flux in a way that is not representative of their prescription. Consequently, the comparison in Section 6 (Figure 7) with Mussack and Däppen's reported slight improvement in sound speed, and the conclusion in Section 7 that the test 'confirms that electronic screening of nuclear reactions is an important ingredient,' go beyond what the implemented proxy can support. The manuscript should either recompute a model with only pp-chain rates reduced by 5% (or otherwise isolate the pp-chain effect), or explicitly reframe the test as a generic sensitivity study and remove the direct comparison with Mussack and Däppen.
  2. [Section 5, Figure 5 and Section 7] The neutrino flux plot is presented without quantitative agreement metrics, and the text disclaims any intention to quantify agreement. However, the conclusion in Section 7 draws a strong inference: the 5% rate reduction 'greatly affects the predictions of neutrino fluxes, but is still far from the observations of the CNO neutrinos.' Because the implemented model reduces CNO rates by 5%, the CNO flux suppression is partly an artifact of the chosen proxy rather than a physical prediction. The paper itself notes that screening is thought to be more important for the CNO cycle, so the statement that the CNO shortfall persists under this test does not constitute evidence against dynamical screening of the CNO cycle. This should be clarified, or the conclusion should be softened to what the proxy actually shows.
  3. [Section 2.7, Figure 1] The claim that 'a large part of the difference comes from the slightly different treatment of opacities' is not quantified. While Figure 1 visually shows that the dashed curves (with swapped opacity tables) are much closer, the residual difference in the convective envelope position and in the density or temperature profiles is not given numerically. Since this is the paper's central quantitative claim, please state the residual BCZ difference (and, if possible, the residual difference in the sound-speed inversion or core temperature) before and after swapping the opacity treatment. This would strengthen the attribution from a visual impression to a quantitative statement.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The name 'Cesam2k2' in the abstract should be 'Cesam2k20' for consistency with the rest of the text.
  2. [Section 5] There is a typo: 'eletronic' should be 'electronic'.
  3. [Figure 5 caption] The label '9B' in the caption should be '8B' (boron-8), matching the text and the common notation.
  4. [Section 2.7] The phrase 'CLES returned a a value' contains a duplicated article; it should read 'CLES returned a value'.
  5. [Reference list] The entries for Boothroyd and Sackmann (2003a) and (2003b) appear identical, with the same title and page numbers; one of them likely refers to a different paper (perhaps 'Our Sun. V'), so the citation should be corrected or disambiguated.
  6. [Section 2.1, 2.5] Minor formatting: 'theT (τ )' in Section 2.1 and '4 .570 Gyr' in Section 2.5 have spacing issues that should be fixed.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Only lithium is a fitted outcome; the opacity-difference and screening comparisons are not circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 2.5 (calibration) and Section 4 (Additional transport and light elements)]
    "When turbulent mixing is included in the models, the reference depth is calibrated (in temperature or mass) or the value of ω when the Proffitt and Michaud (1991) formalism is used. In these cases, we consider the additional constraint on the lithium surface abundance A(Li) = 0.96 ± 0.05 dex (Wang et al., 2021). ... As expected from the calibration, lithium is well reproduced in all models, with slightly different behavior during the evolution."

    The turbulent-mixing strength/reference depth is a free parameter calibrated to the observed lithium abundance A(Li)=0.96. Consequently the DT0/DM0/DCZ models' final 7Li values (0.96–0.98 in Table 2) match the constraint by construction; presenting lithium as 'well reproduced' is a restatement of the calibration, not an independent prediction. The paper's own 'As expected from the calibration' phrasing makes this explicit. Beryllium is not calibrated and therefore retains predictive content, but the lithium statement carries no independent evidential weight.

full rationale

The paper's main quantitative claims are self-contained against external data. The opacity-difference claim is established by a fixed-coordinate audit of the two codes' opacity routines and by re-running Cesam2k20 with CLES's table/interpolation; this is a controlled experiment, not a circular derivation. The helioseismic inversions and Borexino comparisons use external datasets (Basu et al. 2009; Davies et al. 2014; Appel et al. 2022) that are not used to calibrate the models' free parameters. The turbulent-mixing models do fit A(Li)=0.96, so the resulting lithium agreement is a calibrated constraint; the paper acknowledges this, and beryllium remains a genuine discriminator. The electronic-screening test is assumption-laden (a flat 5% reduction applied to all reactions rather than a pp-chain-specific correction), but it is an external proxy from Mussack and Däppen (2011), not a parameter fitted to the compared neutrino or helioseismic data; any mismatch is a correctness/fidelity concern, not circularity. Self-citations (Buldgen et al. 2017, 2019, 2023, 2025; Manchon et al. 2024) are used for method description and prior context; the load-bearing comparisons here are recomputed with two codes and external observables. The only circular element is the acknowledged lithium fit, so the score is 2.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on 7 fitted or chosen parameters (initial composition, mixing length, turbulent mixing amplitude and exponent, nuclear rate reduction factor, and an overshoot parameter for the ECM model) plus standard solar modeling assumptions. No new physical entities are postulated. The two ad hoc assumptions (turbulent diffusion parameterization and the flat 5 percent screening proxy) are explicitly flagged in the text.

free parameters (7)
  • alpha_MLT (mixing length parameter) = not tabulated individually; calibrated per model to match R and L
    Free parameter of mixing length theory, adjusted by the Levenberg-Marquardt calibration in Section 2.5.
  • Y0 (initial helium mass fraction) = 0.2569 to 0.2670 (Table 2)
    Calibrated to match luminosity and radius.
  • (Z/X)0 (initial metal-to-hydrogen ratio) = 0.0181 to 0.0209 (Table 2)
    Calibrated to match the surface Z/X = 0.0181 constraint.
  • Turbulent mixing amplitude or reference depth = values not reported; calibrated to lithium abundance A(Li)=0.96
    In DT0 and DM0 models the reference depth (temperature or mass) is calibrated; in DCZ models omega is calibrated (Section 2.5).
  • Turbulent mixing exponent n = 3 (DT0 and DCZ) or 4 (DM0)
    Chosen by hand following Richer et al. (2000) and Proffitt and Michaud (1991); not fitted to solar data.
  • Nuclear reaction efficiency factor (nuc models) = 0.95 applied to all reactions
    Chosen to mimic dynamical screening following Mussack and Daepen (2011), though originally pp-chain specific; applied globally as stated in Section 2.4.
  • Envelope overshoot parameter (ECM model only) = not reported
    Added in the entropy-calibrated model to preserve the number of free parameters in the calibration (Section 2.5).
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The Sun is modeled as a non-rotating, non-magnetic 1 Msun star with no mass loss, evolving from the pre-main sequence to an age of 4.570 Gyr.
    Stated in Sections 2.1 and 2.5; the solar wind is explicitly neglected.
  • domain assumption The adopted microphysics (AGSS09 mixture, SAHA-S EOS, OPAL high-T plus Ferguson low-T opacities, NACRE plus LUNA reaction rates, Vernazza et al. atmosphere) are accurate enough for the conclusions.
    Input physics choices in Section 2.1; the paper does not vary these.
  • domain assumption Calibration to R, L, and surface Z/X=0.0181 (IAU 2015 values) yields representative solar models.
    Section 2.5 describes the calibration; model-data comparisons assume this calibration is sufficient.
  • ad hoc to paper The ad hoc turbulent diffusion parameterizations of Richer et al. (2000) and Proffitt and Michaud (1991) capture the macroscopic mixing needed to deplete lithium.
    Section 2.3.2 introduces these prescriptions; the paper does not derive them from first principles.
  • ad hoc to paper A flat 5 percent reduction of all nuclear reaction rates is a valid proxy for dynamical electronic screening.
    Section 2.4 states this follows Mussack and Daepen (2011) for the pp chain but is applied to all reactions and is approximative.
  • standard math The SOLA inversion technique with a 6th-order surface correction and the Rabello-Soares et al. (1999) parameter calibration provides reliable structural difference estimates.
    Section 2.6; standard helioseismic inversion methodology.
  • domain assumption The observed lithium abundance A(Li)=0.96 +/- 0.05 of Wang et al. (2021) is the correct constraint for calibrating turbulent mixing.
    Section 2.5 uses this constraint; if wrong, the mixing parameters change.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The impact of the transport of chemicals and electronic screening on helioseismic and neutrino observations in solar models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ONSPGERY

@misc{pith2026250712335,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The impact of the transport of chemicals and electronic screening on helioseismic and neutrino observations in solar models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ONSPGERY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.12335}
}
read the original abstract

The transport of chemical elements in stellar interiors is one of the greatest sources of uncertainties of solar and stellar modelling. The Sun, with its exquisite spectroscopic, helioseismic and neutrino observations, offers a prime environment to test the prescriptions used for both microscopic and macroscopic transport processes. We study in detail the impact of various formalisms for atomic diffusion on helioseismic constraints in both CLES (Scuflaire et al., 2008a) and Cesam2k2 (Morel and Lebreton 2008; Marques et al. 2013; Deal et al. 2018) models and compare both codes in detail. Moreover, due to the inability of standard models using microscopic diffusion to reproduce light element depletion in the Sun (Li, Be), another efficient process must be included to reproduce these constraints (rotation-induced: Eggenberger et al. 2022, overshooting -- or penetrative convection -- below the convective envelope: Th\'evenin et al. 2017, or ad hoc turbulence: Lebreton and Maeder 1987; Richer, Michaud, and Turcotte 2000). However, introducing such an extra mixing leads to issues with the CNO neutrino fluxes (see Buldgen et al. 2023), which seem to be systematically lower than the Borexino observations (Appel et al., 2022. Another key aspect to consider when reconciling models with neutrino fluxes is the impact of electronic screening (Mussack and D\"appen, 2011).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.12335 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Logarithmic differences between models Cesam2k20 and CLES nodiff models for different quantities as a function of the radius. The dashed lines represent the same quantities but the Cesam2k20 model is computed using the exact same opacity table and interpolation method as the CLES model. radius in a Cesam2k20 model, chose the associated density, temperature, and chemical composition, and called the equation of state … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Evolution of the surface Z/X and Y with time (top panel) and Z profiles according to the radius (bottom panel) for models CLES SSM and CESAM SSM, Burgers, SVP. The black symbols and error bar represent the solar values. of the surface abundances are very similar for both SSMs, with a larger initial helium abundance for the CLES model (similarly to the model without diffusion, see Sec. 2.7). As imposed by the calibra… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Same legend as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Evolution of 7Li and 9Be surface abundances with time for CLES (dashed lines) and CESAM (solid lines) SSMs, DT0, DM0, and DCZ models. The black symbols represent the solar values from Wang et al. (2021) and Amarsi et al. (2024) for lithium and beryllium, respectively. …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Fluxes for pp chain, 7Be, 9B, and CNO neutrinos for SSM, noscreen and nuc models. Black symbols represents the observed values from Appel et al. (2022). core between the two codes, as pp and CNO neutrinos show the same trend, while the 7Be and 8B fluxes are quite diffe…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Relative differences between the Sun and the model squared adiabatic sound speed profile c 2 as a function of normalized radius (r/R) for Cesam2k20 models with various implementations of microscopic diffusion. SOLA: transport.tex; 27 August 2025; 13:20; p. 16 [PITH_FU…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Relative differences between the Sun and the model squared adiabatic sound speed profile c 2 as a function of normalized radius (r/R) for Cesam2k20 and CLES models including modifications of nuclear reactions (turning off electronic screening and pp chain efficiency to…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Differences of the squared adiabatic sound speed profile c 2 as a function of normalized radius (r/R) for Cesam2k20 and CLES models including empirical turbulent transport. at the BCZ is unchanged for the CLES model while it clearly worsens for Cesam2k20 models. The im…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Differences of the Ledoux discriminant as a function of normalized radius (r/R) for Cesam2k20 and CLES SSMs and nodiff models. gradients are not too much affected by the change in nuclear reaction efficiency. The variations are mostly localised between 0.2 and 0.3R⊙, w…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Differences of the Ledoux discriminant as a function of normalized radius (r/R) for Cesam2k20 and CLES models including empirical turbulent transport [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Differences of the Ledoux discriminant as a function of normalized radius (r/R) for Cesam2k20 and CLES models reducing the nuclear rates or ignoring the nuclear electronic screening. modelling. Both codes are in good agreement for all the configurations tested in this…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Relative differences of the squared adiabatic sound speed profile c 2 as a function of normalized radius (r/R) for Cesam2k20 models using either the MLT or the ECM treatment of convection. interpolation of opacity tables lead to slight differences in temperature gradi…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , LeBlanc , F

    barticle Alecian , G. , LeBlanc , F. : 2020 , An improved parametric method for evaluating radiative accelerations in stellar interiors . 498 , 3420 . https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2584 . 2020MNRAS.498.3420A . barticle

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2584 2020

  2. [2]

    , Ogneva , D

    barticle Amarsi , A.M. , Ogneva , D. , Buldgen , G. , Grevesse , N. , Zhou , Y. , Barklem , P.S. : 2024 , The solar beryllium abundance revisited with 3D non-LTE models . 690 , A128 . https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451778 . 2024A&A...690A.128A . barticle

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451778 2024

  3. [3]

    : 1999 , NACRE: A European Compilation of Reaction rates for Astrophysics

    bchapter Angulo , C. : 1999 , NACRE: A European Compilation of Reaction rates for Astrophysics . In: American Institute of Physics Conference Series , American Institute of Physics Conference Series 495 , 365 . https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1301821 . 1999AIPC..495..365A . bchapter

    doi:10.1063/1.1301821 1999

  4. [4]

    O . , Pietrofaccia , L. , Pilipenko , N. , Pocar , A. , Raikov , G. , Ranalli , M.T. , Ranucci , G. , Razeto , A. , Re , A. , Redchuk , M. , Rossi , N. , Sch \

    barticle Appel , S. , Bagdasarian , Z. , Basilico , D. , Bellini , G. , Benziger , J. , Biondi , R. , Caccianiga , B. , Calaprice , F. , Caminata , A. , Cavalcante , P. , Chepurnov , A. , D'Angelo , D. , Derbin , A. , Di Giacinto , A. , Di Marcello , V. , Ding , X.F. , Di Ludovico , A. , Di Noto , L. , Drachnev , I. , Franco , D. , Galbiati , C. , Ghiano ...

    2022

  5. [5]

    , Amarsi , A.M

    barticle Asplund , M. , Amarsi , A.M. , Grevesse , N. : 2021 , The chemical make-up of the Sun: A 2020 vision . 653 , A141 . https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 . 2021A&A...653A.141A . barticle

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 2021

  6. [6]

    , Grevesse , N

    barticle Asplund , M. , Grevesse , N. , Sauval , A.J. , Scott , P. : 2009 , The Chemical Composition of the Sun . 47 , 481 . https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 . 2009ARA\ barticle

    arXiv 2009

  7. [7]

    , Auvergne , M

    bchapter Baglin , A. , Auvergne , M. , Boisnard , L. , Lam-Trong , T. , Barge , P. , Catala , C. , Deleuil , M. , Michel , E. , Weiss , W. : 2006 , CoRoT: a high precision photometer for stellar ecolution and exoplanet finding . In: 36th COSPAR Scientific Assembly 36 , 3749 . 2006cosp...36.3749B . bchapter

    2006

  8. [8]

    , Antia , H.M

    barticle Basu , S. , Antia , H.M. : 2008 , Helioseismology and solar abundances . 457 , 217 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2007.12.002 . 2008PhR...457..217B . barticle

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.12.002 2008

Show all 114 references
  1. [9]

    , Christensen-Dalsgaard , J

    barticle Basu , S. , Christensen-Dalsgaard , J. , Chaplin , W.J. , Elsworth , Y. , Isaak , G.R. , New , R. , Schou , J. , Thompson , M.J. , Tomczyk , S. : 1997 , Solar internal sound speed as inferred from combined BiSON and LOWL oscillation frequencies . 292 , 243 . https://d...

    1997 doi

  2. [10]

    , Chaplin , W.J

    barticle Basu , S. , Chaplin , W.J. , Elsworth , Y. , New , R. , Serenelli , A.M. : 2009 , Fresh Insights on the Structure of the Solar Core . 699 , 1403 . https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/1403 . 2009ApJ...699.1403B . barticle

    2009 doi

  3. [11]

    , Ayukov , S.V

    bchapter Baturin , V.A. , Ayukov , S.V. , Gryaznov , V.K. , Iosilevskiy , I.L. , Fortov , V.E. , Starostin , A.N. : 2013 , The Current Version of the SAHA-S Equation of State: Improvement and Perspective . In: Shibahashi , H. , Lynas-Gray , A.E. (eds.) Progress in Physics of t...

    2013

  4. [12]

    , D \"a ppen , W

    barticle Baturin , V.A. , D \"a ppen , W. , Morel , P. , Oreshina , A.V. , Th \'e venin , F. , Gryaznov , V.K. , Iosilevskiy , I.L. , Starostin , A.N. , Fortov , V.E. : 2017 , Equation of state SAHA-S meets stellar evolution code CESAM2k . 606 , A129 . https://doi.org/10.1051/...

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    , Oreshina , A.V

    barticle Baturin , V.A. , Oreshina , A.V. , Buldgen , G. , Ayukov , S.V. , Gryaznov , V.K. , Iosilevskiy , I.L. , Noels , A. , Scuflaire , R. : 2024 , Heavy Elements Abundances Inferred from the First Adiabatic Exponent in the Solar Envelope . 299 , 142 . https://doi.org/10.10...

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    , Ayukov , S.V

    barticle Baturin , V.A. , Ayukov , S.V. , Oreshina , A.V. , Gorshkov , A.B. , Gryaznov , V.K. , Iosilevskiy , I.L. , D \"a ppen , W. : 2025 , Hydrogen Ionization Inside the Sun . 300 , 3 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-024-02413-9 . 2025SoPh..300....3B . barticle

    2025 doi

  7. [15]

    o hm-Vitense , E. : 1958 , \

    barticle B \"o hm-Vitense , E. : 1958 , \"U ber die Wasserstoffkonvektionszone in Sternen verschiedener Effektivtemperaturen und Leuchtkr \"a fte. Mit 5 Textabbildungen . 46 , 108 . 1958ZA.....46..108B . barticle

    1958

  8. [17]

    , Sackmann , I.-J

    barticle Boothroyd , A.I. , Sackmann , I.-J. : 2003 b, Our Sun. IV. The Standard Model and Helioseismology: Consequences of Uncertainties in Input Physics and in Observed Solar Parameters . 583 , 1004 . https://doi.org/10.1086/345407 . 2003ApJ...583.1004B . barticle

    2003 doi

  9. [18]

    , Koch , D

    barticle Borucki , W.J. , Koch , D. , et al. : 2010 , Kepler Planet-Detection Mission: Introduction and First Results . Science 327 , 977 . https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185402 . 2010Sci...327..977B . barticle

    2010 doi

  10. [19]

    , Sawyer , R.F

    barticle Brown , L.S. , Sawyer , R.F. : 1997 , Nuclear reaction rates in a plasma . Reviews of Modern Physics 69 , 411 . https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.69.411 . 1997RvMP...69..411B . barticle

    1997 doi

  11. [20]

    , Antia , H.M

    barticle Brun , A.S. , Antia , H.M. , Chitre , S.M. , Zahn , J.-P. : 2002 , Seismic tests for solar models with tachocline mixing . 391 , 725 . https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20020837 . 2002A&A...391..725B . barticle

    2002 doi

  12. [21]

    , Salmon , S

    barticle Buldgen , G. , Salmon , S. , Noels , A. : 2019 , Progress in global helioseismology: a new light on the solar modelling problem and its implications for solar-like stars . Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 6 , 42 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2019.00042 . 20...

    2019

  13. [22]

    , Salmon , S.J.A.J

    barticle Buldgen , G. , Salmon , S.J.A.J. , Godart , M. , Noels , A. , Scuflaire , R. , Dupret , M.A. , Reese , D.R. , Colgan , J. , Fontes , C.J. , Eggenberger , P. , Hakel , P. , Kilcrease , D.P. , Richard , O. : 2017 , Inversions of the Ledoux discriminant: a closer look at...

    2017 doi

  14. [23]

    , Salmon , S.J.A.J

    barticle Buldgen , G. , Salmon , S.J.A.J. , Noels , A. , Scuflaire , R. , Montalban , J. , Baturin , V.A. , Eggenberger , P. , Gryaznov , V.K. , Iosilevskiy , I.L. , Meynet , G. , Chaplin , W.J. , Miglio , A. , Oreshina , A.V. , Richard , O. , Starostin , A.N. : 2019 , Combini...

    2019 doi

  15. [24]

    , Eggenberger , P

    barticle Buldgen , G. , Eggenberger , P. , Noels , A. , Scuflaire , R. , Amarsi , A.M. , Grevesse , N. , Salmon , S. : 2023 , Higher metal abundances do not solve the solar problem . 669 , L9 . https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202245448 . 2023A&A...669L...9B . barticle

    2023 doi

  16. [25]

    , Noels , A

    barticle Buldgen , G. , Noels , A. , Baturin , V.A. , Oreshina , A.V. , Ayukov , S.V. , Scuflaire , R. , Amarsi , A.M. , Grevesse , N. : 2024 a, Helioseismic determination of the solar metal mass fraction . 681 , A57 . https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346928 . 2024A&A...68...

    2024 doi

  17. [26]

    , Noels , A

    barticle Buldgen , G. , Noels , A. , Scuflaire , R. , Amarsi , A.M. , Grevesse , N. , Eggenberger , P. , Colgan , J. , Fontes , C.J. , Baturin , V.A. , Oreshina , A.V. , Ayukov , S.V. , Hakel , P. , Kilcrease , D.P. : 2024 b, In-depth analysis of solar models with high-metalli...

    2024 doi

  18. [27]

    , Noels , A

    barticle Buldgen , G. , Noels , A. , Amarsi , A.M. , Nandal , D. , Pezzotti , C. , Scuflaire , R. , Deal , M. , Grevesse , N. : 2025 , Constraints on the properties of macroscopic transport in the Sun from combined lithium and beryllium depletion . 694 , A285 . https://doi.org...

    2025 doi

  19. [28]

    , Pain , J.-C

    barticle Buldgen , G. , Pain , J.-C. , Coss \'e , P. , Blancard , C. , Gilleron , F. , K. Pradhan , A. , J. Fontes , C. , Colgan , J. , Noels , A. , Christensen-Dalsgaard , J. , Deal , M. , V. Ayukov , S. , A. Baturin , V. , V. Oreshina , A. , Scuflaire , R. , Pin c on , C. , ...

    2025 doi

  20. [29]

    : 1969 , Flow Equations for Composite Gases

    bbook Burgers , J.M. : 1969 , Flow Equations for Composite Gases . 1969fecg.book.....B . bbook

    1969

  21. [30]

    , Mazzitelli , I

    barticle Canuto , V.M. , Mazzitelli , I. : 1991 , Stellar Turbulent Convection: A New Model and Applications . 370 , 295 . https://doi.org/10.1086/169815 . 1991ApJ...370..295C . barticle

    1991 doi

  22. [31]

    , Goldman , I

    barticle Canuto , V.M. , Goldman , I. , Mazzitelli , I. : 1996 , Stellar Turbulent Convection: A Self-consistent Model . 473 , 550 . https://doi.org/10.1086/178166 . 1996ApJ...473..550C . barticle

    1996 doi

  23. [32]

    : 2002 , Helioseismology

    barticle Christensen-Dalsgaard , J. : 2002 , Helioseismology . Reviews of Modern Physics 74 , 1073 . https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.74.1073 . 2002RvMP...74.1073C . barticle

    2002 doi

  24. [33]

    : 2021 , Solar structure and evolution

    barticle Christensen-Dalsgaard , J. : 2021 , Solar structure and evolution . Living Reviews in Solar Physics 18 , 2 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-020-00028-3 . 2021LRSP...18....2C . barticle

    2021 doi

  25. [34]

    , Gough , D.O

    barticle Christensen-Dalsgaard , J. , Gough , D.O. , Knudstrup , E. : 2018 , On the hydrostatic stratification of the solar tachocline . 477 , 3845 . https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty752 . 2018MNRAS.477.3845C . barticle

    2018 doi

  26. [35]

    , Proffitt , C.R

    barticle Christensen-Dalsgaard , J. , Proffitt , C.R. , Thompson , M.J. : 1993 , Effects of Diffusion on Solar Models and Their Oscillation Frequencies . 403 , L75 . https://doi.org/10.1086/186725 . 1993ApJ...403L..75C . barticle

    1993 doi

  27. [36]

    , Giuli , R.T

    bbook Cox , J.P. , Giuli , R.T. : 1968 , Principles of stellar structure . 1968pss..book.....C . bbook

    1968

  28. [37]

    : 2024 , The Current State of the Controversy over Screening in Nuclear Reactions

    barticle D \"a ppen , W. : 2024 , The Current State of the Controversy over Screening in Nuclear Reactions . 299 , 128 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-024-02377-w . 2024SoPh..299..128D . barticle

    2024 doi

  29. [38]

    , Broomhall , A.M

    barticle Davies , G.R. , Broomhall , A.M. , Chaplin , W.J. , Elsworth , Y. , Hale , S.J. : 2014 , Low-frequency, low-degree solar p-mode properties from 22 years of Birmingham Solar Oscillations Network data . 439 , 2025 . https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu080 . 2014MNRAS.439.2...

    2014 doi

  30. [39]

    , Alecian , G

    barticle Deal , M. , Alecian , G. , Lebreton , Y. , Goupil , M.J. , Marques , J.P. , LeBlanc , F. , Morel , P. , Pichon , B. : 2018 , Impacts of radiative accelerations on solar-like oscillating main-sequence stars . 618 , A10 . https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833361 . 20...

    2018 doi

  31. [40]

    , Palacios , A

    barticle Dumont , T. , Palacios , A. , Charbonnel , C. , Richard , O. , Amard , L. , Augustson , K. , Mathis , S. : 2021 , Lithium depletion and angular momentum transport in solar-type stars . 646 , A48 . https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039515 . 2021A&A...646A..48D . barticle

    2021 doi

  32. [41]

    , Pamyatnykh , A.A

    barticle Dziembowski , W.A. , Pamyatnykh , A.A. , Sienkiewicz , R. : 1990 , Solar model from helioseismology and the neutrino flux problem . 244 , 542 . 1990MNRAS.244..542D . barticle

    1990

  33. [42]

    , Turck-Chieze , S

    barticle Dzitko , H. , Turck-Chieze , S. , Delbourgo-Salvador , P. , Lagrange , C. : 1995 , The Screened Nuclear Reaction Rates and the Solar Neutrino Puzzle . 447 , 428 . https://doi.org/10.1086/175887 . 1995ApJ...447..428D . barticle

    1995 doi

  34. [43]

    , Buldgen , G

    barticle Eggenberger , P. , Buldgen , G. , Salmon , S.J.A.J. , Noels , A. , Grevesse , N. , Asplund , M. : 2022 , The internal rotation of the Sun and its link to the solar Li and He surface abundances . Nature Astronomy 6 , 788 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01677-0 . 2...

    2022 doi

  35. [44]

    , Dupret , M.-A

    barticle Farnir , M. , Dupret , M.-A. , Buldgen , G. , Salmon , S.J.A.J. , Noels , A. , Pin c on , C. , Pezzotti , C. , Eggenberger , P. : 2020 , Thorough characterisation of the 16 Cygni system. I. Forward seismic modelling with WhoSGlAd . 644 , A37 . https://doi.org/10.1051/...

    2020 doi

  36. [45]

    , Alexander , D.R

    barticle Ferguson , J.W. , Alexander , D.R. , Allard , F. , Barman , T. , Bodnarik , J.G. , Hauschildt , P.H. , Heffner-Wong , A. , Tamanai , A. : 2005 , Low-Temperature Opacities . 623 , 585 . https://doi.org/10.1086/428642 . 2005ApJ...623..585F . barticle

    2005 doi

  37. [46]

    , Ricci , B

    barticle Fiorentini , G. , Ricci , B. , Villante , F.L. : 2001 , Helioseismology and screening of nuclear reactions in the Sun . Physics Letters B 503 , 121 . https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00221-0 . 2001PhLB..503..121F . barticle

    2001 doi

  38. [47]

    : 1997 , Influence of heavy element and rotationally induced diffusions on the solar models

    barticle Gabriel , M. : 1997 , Influence of heavy element and rotationally induced diffusions on the solar models. 327 , 771 . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9706213 . 1997A&A...327..771G . barticle

    1997 doi arXiv

  39. [48]

    , Baturin , V.A

    barticle Gorshkov , A.B. , Baturin , V.A. : 2008 , Diffusion settling of heavy elements in the solar interior . Astronomy Reports 52 , 760 . https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063772908090072 . 2008ARep...52..760G . barticle

    2008 doi

  40. [49]

    , Weiss , N.O

    barticle Gough , D.O. , Weiss , N.O. : 1976 , The calibration of stellar convection theories. 176 , 589 . https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/176.3.589 . 1976MNRAS.176..589G . barticle

    1976 doi

  41. [50]

    , Kosovichev , A.G

    barticle Gough , D.O. , Kosovichev , A.G. , Toomre , J. , Anderson , E. , Antia , H.M. , Basu , S. , Chaboyer , B. , Chitre , S.M. , Christensen-Dalsgaard , J. , Dziembowski , W.A. , Eff-Darwich , A. , Elliott , J.R. , Giles , P.M. , Goode , P.R. , Guzik , J.A. , Harvey , J.W....

    1996

  42. [51]

    , Dewitt , H.E

    barticle Graboske , H.C. , Dewitt , H.E. , Grossman , A.S. , Cooper , M.S. : 1973 , Screening Factors for Nuclear Reactions. II. Intermediate Screen-Ing and Astrophysical Applications . 181 , 457 . https://doi.org/10.1086/152062 . 1973ApJ...181..457G . barticle

    1973 doi

  43. [52]

    , Ayukov , S.V

    bchapter Gryaznov , V.K. , Ayukov , S.V. , Baturin , V.A. , Iosilevskiy , I.L. , Starostin , A.N. , Fortov , V.E. : 2004 , SAHA-S model: Equation of State and Thermodynamic Functions of Solar Plasma . In: Celebonovic , V. , Gough , D. , D \"a ppen , W. (eds.) Equation-of-State...

    2004 doi

  44. [53]

    , Kupka , F

    barticle Heiter , U. , Kupka , F. , van't Veer-Menneret , C. , Barban , C. , Weiss , W.W. , Goupil , M.-J. , Schmidt , W. , Katz , D. , Garrido , R. : 2002 , New grids of ATLAS9 atmospheres I: Influence of convection treatments on model structure and on observable quantities ....

    2002 doi

  45. [54]

    , Rogers , F.J

    barticle Iglesias , C.A. , Rogers , F.J. : 1996 , Updated Opal Opacities . 464 , 943 . https://doi.org/10.1086/177381 . 1996ApJ...464..943I . barticle

    1996 doi

  46. [55]

    u l \"o p , Z. , Gervino , G. , Guglielmetti , A. , Gustavino , C. , Gy \

    barticle Imbriani , G. , Costantini , H. , Formicola , A. , Bemmerer , D. , Bonetti , R. , Broggini , C. , Corvisiero , P. , Cruz , J. , F \"u l \"o p , Z. , Gervino , G. , Guglielmetti , A. , Gustavino , C. , Gy \"u rky , G. , Jesus , A.P. , Junker , M. , Lemut , A. , Menegaz...

    2004

  47. [56]

    , Guillot , T

    barticle Kunitomo , M. , Guillot , T. : 2021 , Imprint of planet formation in the deep interior of the Sun . 655 , A51 . https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141256 . 2021A&A...655A..51K . barticle

    2021 doi

  48. [57]

    , Guillot , T

    barticle Kunitomo , M. , Guillot , T. , Buldgen , G. : 2022 , Evidence of a signature of planet formation processes from solar neutrino fluxes . 667 , L2 . https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244169 . 2022A&A...667L...2K . barticle

    2022 doi

  49. [58]

    , Maeder , A

    barticle Lebreton , Y. , Maeder , A. : 1987 , Stellar evolution with turbulent diffusion mixing. VI - The solar model, surface Li-7, and He-3 abundances, solar neutrinos and oscillations . 175 , 99 . 1987A&A...175...99L . barticle

    1987

  50. [59]

    , Goupil , M.J

    bchapter Lebreton , Y. , Goupil , M.J. , Montalb \'a n , J. : 2014 a, How accurate are stellar ages based on stellar models?. I. The impact of stellar models uncertainties . In: Lebreton , Y. , Valls-Gabaud , D. , Charbonnel , C. (eds.) EAS Publications Series , EAS Publicatio...

    2014

  51. [60]

    , Goupil , M.J

    bchapter Lebreton , Y. , Goupil , M.J. , Montalb \'a n , J. : 2014 b, How accurate are stellar ages based on stellar models?. II. The impact of asteroseismology . In: Lebreton , Y. , Valls-Gabaud , D. , Charbonnel , C. (eds.) EAS Publications Series , EAS Publications Series 6...

    2014

  52. [61]

    , Montalb \'a n , J

    bchapter Lebreton , Y. , Montalb \'a n , J. , Christensen-Dalsgaard , J. , Th \'e ado , S. , Hui-Bon-Hoa , A. , Monteiro , M.J.P.F.G. , Degl'Innocenti , S. , Marconi , M. , Morel , P. , Prada Moroni , P.G. , Weiss , A. : 2007 , Microscopic Diffusion in Stellar Evolution Codes:...

    2007 doi

  53. [62]

    , Montalb \'a n , J

    barticle Lebreton , Y. , Montalb \'a n , J. , Christensen-Dalsgaard , J. , Roxburgh , I.W. , Weiss , A. : 2008 , CoRoT/ESTA TASK 1 and TASK 3 comparison of the internal structure and seismic properties of representative stellar models: Comparisons between the ASTEC, CESAM, CLE...

    2008 doi

  54. [63]

    , Freytag , B

    barticle Ludwig , H.-G. , Freytag , B. , Steffen , M. : 1999 , A calibration of the mixing-length for solar-type stars based on hydrodynamical simulations. I. Methodical aspects and results for solar metallicity . 346 , 111 . barticle

    1999

  55. [64]

    : 2009 , Physics, Formation and Evolution of Rotating Stars

    bbook Maeder , A. : 2009 , Physics, Formation and Evolution of Rotating Stars . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76949-1 . 2009pfer.book.....M . bbook

    2009 doi

  56. [65]

    , Weiss , A

    barticle Magic , Z. , Weiss , A. , Asplund , M. : 2015 , The Stagger-grid: A grid of 3D stellar atmosphere models. III. The relation to mixing length convection theory . 573 , A89 . https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423760 . 2015A&A...573A..89M . barticle

    2015 doi

  57. [66]

    , Prsa , A

    botherref Mamajek , E.E. , Prsa , A. , Torres , G. , Harmanec , P. , Asplund , M. , Bennett , P.D. , Capitaine , N. , Christensen-Dalsgaard , J. , Depagne , E. , Folkner , W.M. , Haberreiter , M. , Hekker , S. , Hilton , J.L. , Kostov , V. , Kurtz , D.W. , Laskar , J. , Mason ...

    2015 doi arXiv

  58. [67]

    , Deal , M

    barticle Manchon , L. , Deal , M. , Goupil , M.-J. , Serenelli , A. , Lebreton , Y. , Klevas , J. , Ku c inskas , A. , Ludwig , H.-G. , Montalb \'a n , J. , Gizon , L. : 2024 , Entropy-calibrated stellar modeling: Testing and improving the use of prescriptions for the entropy ...

    2024 doi

  59. [68]

    , Mussack , K

    barticle Mao , D. , Mussack , K. , D \"a ppen , W. : 2009 , Dynamic Screening in Solar Plasma . 701 , 1204 . https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/1204 . 2009ApJ...701.1204M . barticle

    2009 doi

  60. [69]

    , Goupil , M.J

    barticle Marques , J.P. , Goupil , M.J. , Lebreton , Y. , Talon , S. , Palacios , A. , Belkacem , K. , Ouazzani , R.-M. , Mosser , B. , Moya , A. , Morel , P. , Pichon , B. , Mathis , S. , Zahn , J.-P. , Turck-Chi \`e ze , S. , Nghiem , P.A.P. : 2013 , Seismic diagnostics for ...

    2013 doi

  61. [70]

    , Proffitt , C.R

    bchapter Michaud , G. , Proffitt , C.R. : 1993 , Particle transport processes . In: Weiss , W.W. , Baglin , A. (eds.) IAU Colloq. 137: Inside the Stars , Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series 40 , 246 . 1993ASPC...40..246M . bchapter

    1993

  62. [71]

    , Richer , J

    barticle Michaud , G. , Richer , J. , Vick , M. : 2011 , Sirius A: turbulence or mass loss? 534 , A18 . https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201116999 . 2011A\ barticle

    2011 doi

  63. [72]

    : 1977 , Thermonuclear ion-electron screening at all densities

    barticle Mitler , H.E. : 1977 , Thermonuclear ion-electron screening at all densities. I. Static solution. 212 , 513 . https://doi.org/10.1086/155071 . 1977ApJ...212..513M . barticle

    1977 doi

  64. [73]

    , Th \'e ado , S

    bchapter Montalb \'a n , J. , Th \'e ado , S. , Lebreton , Y. : 2007 , Comparisons for ESTA-Task3: CLES and CESAM . In: Straka , C.W. , Lebreton , Y. , Monteiro , M.J.P.F.G. (eds.) EAS Publications Series , EAS Publications Series 26 , 167 . https://doi.org/10.1051/eas:2007135...

    2007 doi

  65. [74]

    , Lebreton , Y

    barticle Montalb \'a n , J. , Lebreton , Y. , Miglio , A. , Scuflaire , R. , Morel , P. , Noels , A. : 2008 , Thorough analysis of input physics in CESAM and CL \'E S codes . 316 , 219 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-008-9803-x . 2008Ap&SS.316..219M . barticle

    2008 doi

  66. [75]

    , Lebreton , Y

    bchapter Monteiro , M.J.P.F.G. , Lebreton , Y. , Montalban , J. , Christensen-Dalsgaard , J. , Castro , M. , Degl'Innocenti , S. , Moya , A. , Roxburgh , I.W. , Scuflaire , R. , Baglin , A. , Cunha , M.S. , Eggenberger , P. , Fernandes , J. , Goupil , M.J. , Hui-Bon-Hoa , A. ,...

    2006 doi arXiv

  67. [76]

    , Lebreton , Y

    barticle Morel , P. , Lebreton , Y. : 2008 , CESAM: a free code for stellar evolution calculations . 316 , 61 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-007-9663-9 . 2008Ap\ barticle

    2008 doi

  68. [77]

    , D \"a ppen , W

    barticle Mussack , K. , D \"a ppen , W. : 2011 , Dynamic Screening Correction for Solar p-p Reaction Rates . 729 , 96 . https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/729/2/96 . 2011ApJ...729...96M . barticle

    2011 doi

  69. [78]

    , Pelletier , C

    barticle Paquette , C. , Pelletier , C. , Fontaine , G. , Michaud , G. : 1986 , Diffusion Coefficients for Stellar Plasmas . 61 , 177 . https://doi.org/10.1086/191111 . 1986ApJS...61..177P . barticle

    1986 doi

  70. [79]

    , Thompson , M.J

    barticle Pijpers , F.P. , Thompson , M.J. : 1994 , The SOLA method for helioseismic inversion . 281 , 231 . 1994A&A...281..231P . barticle

    1994

  71. [80]

    , Michaud , G

    barticle Proffitt , C.R. , Michaud , G. : 1991 , Gravitational Settling in Solar Models . 380 , 238 . https://doi.org/10.1086/170580 . 1991ApJ...380..238P . barticle

    1991 doi

  72. [81]

    , Basu , S

    barticle Rabello-Soares , M.C. , Basu , S. , Christensen-Dalsgaard , J. : 1999 , On the choice of parameters in solar-structure inversion . 309 , 35 . https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02785.x . 1999MNRAS.309...35R . barticle

    1999

  73. [82]

    , Aerts , C

    barticle Rauer , H. , Aerts , C. , Cabrera , J. , Deleuil , M. , Erikson , A. , Gizon , L. , Goupil , M. , Heras , A. , Walloschek , T. , Lorenzo-Alvarez , J. , Marliani , F. , Martin-Garcia , C. , Mas-Hesse , J.M. , O'Rourke , L. , Osborn , H. , Pagano , I. , Piotto , G. , Po...

    2025

  74. [83]

    , Vauclair , S

    barticle Richard , O. , Vauclair , S. : 1997 , Local mixing near the solar core, neutrino fluxes and helioseismology. 322 , 671 . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9609133 . 1997A&A...322..671R . barticle

    1997 doi arXiv

  75. [84]

    , Michaud , G

    barticle Richard , O. , Michaud , G. , Richer , J. : 2001 , Iron Convection Zones in B, A, and F Stars . 558 , 377 . https://doi.org/10.1086/322264 . 2001ApJ...558..377R . barticle

    2001 doi

  76. [85]

    , Michaud , G

    barticle Richard , O. , Michaud , G. , Richer , J. : 2002 , Models of Metal-poor Stars with Gravitational Settling and Radiative Accelerations. III. Metallicity Dependence . 580 , 1100 . https://doi.org/10.1086/343733 . 2002ApJ...580.1100R . barticle

    2002 doi

  77. [86]

    , Vauclair , S

    barticle Richard , O. , Vauclair , S. , Charbonnel , C. , Dziembowski , W.A. : 1996 , New solar models including helioseismological constraints and light-element depletion. 312 , 1000 . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9601136 . 1996A&A...312.1000R . barticle

    1996 doi arXiv

  78. [87]

    , Michaud , G

    barticle Richer , J. , Michaud , G. , Turcotte , S. : 2000 , The Evolution of AMFM Stars, Abundance Anomalies, and Turbulent Transport . 529 , 338 . https://doi.org/10.1086/308274 . 2000ApJ...529..338R . barticle

    2000 doi

  79. [88]

    : 2016 , The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS): Discovering Exoplanets in the Solar Neighborhood

    bchapter Ricker , G.R. : 2016 , The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS): Discovering Exoplanets in the Solar Neighborhood . In: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts , P13C . 2016AGUFM.P13C..01R . bchapter

    2016

  80. [89]

    , Nayfonov , A

    barticle Rogers , F.J. , Nayfonov , A. : 2002 , Updated and Expanded OPAL Equation-of-State Tables: Implications for Helioseismology . 576 , 1064 . https://doi.org/10.1086/341894 . 2002ApJ...576.1064R . barticle

    2002 doi

  81. [90]

    , Buldgen , G

    barticle Salmon , S.J.A.J. , Buldgen , G. , Noels , A. , Eggenberger , P. , Scuflaire , R. , Meynet , G. : 2021 , Standard solar models: Perspectives from updated solar neutrino fluxes and gravity-mode period spacing . 651 , A106 . https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140769 ....

    2021 doi

  82. [91]

    : 1954 , Electrons Screening and Thermonuclear Reactions

    barticle Salpeter , E.E. : 1954 , Electrons Screening and Thermonuclear Reactions . Australian Journal of Physics 7 , 373 . https://doi.org/10.1071/PH540373 . 1954AuJPh...7..373S . barticle

    1954 doi

  83. [92]

    , Kupka , F

    barticle Samadi , R. , Kupka , F. , Goupil , M.J. , Lebreton , Y. , van't Veer-Menneret , C. : 2006 , Influence of local treatments of convection upon solar p mode excitation rates . 445 , 233 . https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20052904 . 2006A&A...445..233S . barticle

    2006 doi

  84. [93]

    : 2002 , Microscopic diffusion of partly ionized metals in the Sun and metal-poor stars

    barticle Schlattl , H. : 2002 , Microscopic diffusion of partly ionized metals in the Sun and metal-poor stars . 395 , 85 . https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20021212 . 2002A&A...395...85S . barticle

    2002 doi

  85. [94]

    , Th \'e ado , S

    barticle Scuflaire , R. , Th \'e ado , S. , Montalb \'a n , J. , Miglio , A. , Bourge , P.-O. , Godart , M. , Thoul , A. , Noels , A. : 2008 a, CL \'E S, Code Li \'e geois d' \'E volution Stellaire . 316 , 83 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-007-9650-1 . 2008Ap&SS.316...83S . barticle

    2008 doi

  86. [95]

    , Montalb \'a n , J

    barticle Scuflaire , R. , Montalb \'a n , J. , Th \'e ado , S. , Bourge , P.-O. , Miglio , A. , Godart , M. , Thoul , A. , Noels , A. : 2008 b, The Li \`e ge Oscillation code . 316 , 149 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-007-9577-6 . 2008Ap&SS.316..149S . barticle

    2008 doi

  87. [96]

    , Bergemann , M

    barticle Semenova , E. , Bergemann , M. , Deal , M. , Serenelli , A. , Hansen , C.J. , Gallagher , A.J. , Bayo , A. , Bensby , T. , Bragaglia , A. , Carraro , G. , Morbidelli , L. , Pancino , E. , Smiljanic , R. : 2020 , The Gaia-ESO survey: 3D NLTE abundances in the open clus...

    2020 doi

  88. [97]

    , Basu , S

    barticle Serenelli , A.M. , Basu , S. , Ferguson , J.W. , Asplund , M. : 2009 , New Solar Composition: The Problem with Solar Models Revisited . 705 , L123 . https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/705/2/L123 . 2009ApJ...705L.123S . barticle

    2009 doi

  89. [98]

    : 2004 , Numerical experiments in screening theory

    barticle Shaviv , G. : 2004 , Numerical experiments in screening theory . 418 , 801 . https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20034516 . 2004A&A...418..801S . barticle

    2004 doi

  90. [99]

    , Shaviv , G

    barticle Shaviv , N.J. , Shaviv , G. : 1996 , The Electrostatic Screening of Thermonuclear Reactions in Astrophysical Plasmas. I. 468 , 433 . https://doi.org/10.1086/177702 . 1996ApJ...468..433S . barticle

    1996 doi

  91. [100]

    , Demarque , P

    barticle Spada , F. , Demarque , P. : 2019 , Testing the entropy calibration of the radii of cool stars: models of Centauri A and B . 489 , 4712 . https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2465 . 2019MNRAS.489.4712S . barticle

    2019 doi

  92. [101]

    , Demarque , P

    barticle Spada , F. , Demarque , P. , Kupka , F. : 2021 , Stellar evolution models with entropy-calibrated mixing-length parameter: application to red giants . 504 , 3128 . https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1106 . 2021MNRAS.504.3128S . barticle

    2021 doi

  93. [102]

    , Demarque , P

    barticle Spada , F. , Demarque , P. , Basu , S. , Tanner , J.D. : 2018 , Improved Calibration of the Radii of Cool Stars Based on 3D Simulations of Convection: Implications for the Solar Model . 869 , 135 . https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaee75 . 2018ApJ...869..135S . barticle

    2018 doi

  94. [103]

    , Basu , S

    barticle Tanner , J.D. , Basu , S. , Demarque , P. : 2016 , Entropy in Adiabatic Regions of Convection Simulations . 822 , L17 . https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/822/1/L17 . 2016ApJ...822L..17T . barticle

    2016 doi

  95. [104]

    , Oreshina , A.V

    barticle Th \'e venin , F. , Oreshina , A.V. , Baturin , V.A. , Gorshkov , A.B. , Morel , P. , Provost , J. : 2017 , Evolution of lithium abundance in the Sun and solar twins . 598 , A64 . https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629385 . 2017A&A...598A..64T . barticle

    2017 doi

  96. [105]

    , Christensen-Dalsgaard , J

    barticle Thompson , M.J. , Christensen-Dalsgaard , J. , Miesch , M.S. , Toomre , J. : 2003 , The Internal Rotation of the Sun . 41 , 599 . https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094848 . 2003ARA&A..41..599T . barticle

    2003 arXiv

  97. [106]

    , Bahcall , J.N

    barticle Thoul , A.A. , Bahcall , J.N. , Loeb , A. : 1994 , Element diffusion in the solar interior . 421 , 828 . https://doi.org/10.1086/173695 . 1994ApJ...421..828T . barticle

    1994 doi

  98. [107]

    , Richer , J

    barticle Turcotte , S. , Richer , J. , Michaud , G. , Iglesias , C.A. , Rogers , F.J. : 1998 , Consistent Solar Evolution Model Including Diffusion and Radiative Acceleration Effects . ApJ 504 , 539 . https://doi.org/10.1086/306055 . 1998ApJ...504..539T . barticle

    1998 doi

  99. [108]

    , Avrett , E.H

    barticle Vernazza , J.E. , Avrett , E.H. , Loeser , R. : 1981 , Structure of the solar chromosphere. III. Models of the EUV brightness components of the quiet sun. 45 , 635 . https://doi.org/10.1086/190731 . 1981ApJS...45..635V . barticle

    1981 doi

  100. [109]

    , Serenelli , A

    barticle Villante , F.L. , Serenelli , A. : 2021 , The relevance of nuclear reactions for Standard Solar Models construction . Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 7 , 112 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2020.618356 . 2021FrASS...7..112V . barticle

    2021

  101. [110]

    , Baturin , V.A

    barticle Vorontsov , S.V. , Baturin , V.A. , Ayukov , S.V. , Gryaznov , V.K. : 2013 , Helioseismic calibration of the equation of state and chemical composition in the solar convective envelope . 430 , 1636 . https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts701 . 2013MNRAS.430.1636V . barticle

    2013 doi

  102. [111]

    , Baturin , V.A

    barticle Vorontsov , S.V. , Baturin , V.A. , Ayukov , S.V. , Gryaznov , V.K. : 2014 , Helioseismic measurements in the solar envelope using group velocities of surface waves . 441 , 3296 . https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu813 . 2014MNRAS.441.3296V . barticle

    2014 doi

  103. [112]

    , Nordlander , T

    barticle Wang , E.X. , Nordlander , T. , Asplund , M. , Amarsi , A.M. , Lind , K. , Zhou , Y. : 2021 , 3D NLTE spectral line formation of lithium in late-type stars . 500 , 2159 . https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3381 . 2021MNRAS.500.2159W . barticle

    2021 doi

  104. [113]

    , Flaskamp , M

    barticle Weiss , A. , Flaskamp , M. , Tsytovich , V.N. : 2001 , Solar models and electron screening . 371 , 1123 . https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20010225 . 2001A&A...371.1123W . barticle

    2001 doi

  105. [114]

    , Mussack , K

    barticle Wood , S.R. , Mussack , K. , Guzik , J.A. : 2018 , Solar Models with Dynamic Screening and Early Mass Loss Tested by Helioseismic, Astrophysical, and Planetary Constraints . 293 , 111 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-1334-1 . 2018SoPh..293..111W . barticle

    2018 doi

  106. [115]

    , Li , Y

    barticle Zhang , Q.-S. , Li , Y. , Christensen-Dalsgaard , J. : 2019 , Solar Models with Convective Overshoot, Solar-wind Mass Loss, and PMS Disk Accretion: Helioseismic Quantities, Li Depletion, and Neutrino Fluxes . 881 , 103 . https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab2f77 . 2019...

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.