pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.21117 · v1 · pith:OOBKVRUKnew · submitted 2026-06-19 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

VST-SMASH: VST Survey of Mass Assembly and Structural Hierarchy II. Exploring dwarf galaxies in the vicinity of NGC 5068 and of the two galaxies NGC 5084 and NGC 5087 at the edges of the Virgo Supercluster

C. Tortora , R. Ragusa , L. K. Hunt , A. Unni , M. Baes , Abdurro'uf , F. Annibali , M. Gatto
show 4 more authors
N. R. Napolitano H. Su A. Venhola D. Carollo
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 14:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords dwarf galaxieslow surface brightnessgalaxy photometrysatellite galaxiesVirgo SuperclusterNGC 5068surface brightness profiles
0
0 comments X

The pith

Deep imaging of fields around NGC 5068 and two Virgo-edge galaxies reveals 47 dwarf candidates, ten times the number previously known.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents results from very deep VST imaging of a 2.6 square degree field around three nearby galaxies. A two-step visual inspection identifies 47 low-surface-brightness objects whose colors, sizes, and Sersic indices match the properties of known dwarf galaxies. Only four of these objects had been reported before. Spatial positions suggest that a substantial fraction lie at distances consistent with physical association to NGC 5068, NGC 5084, or NGC 5087. The work therefore supplies a much larger sample of candidate satellites for future distance and velocity measurements.

Core claim

Using VST-SMASH imaging that reaches g- and r-band surface-brightness limits of approximately 30 mag arcsec^{-2}, a two-step visual inspection isolates 47 dwarf-galaxy candidates whose median colors are g-r = 0.57 and r-i = 0.24. Surface photometry and one-dimensional Sersic fits yield n < 2 profiles and scaling relations consistent with literature dwarfs. Spatial offsets relative to the three host galaxies indicate that many candidates occupy physically plausible distances from NGC 5068, NGC 5084, and NGC 5087.

What carries the argument

Two-step visual inspection of ultra-deep, wide-field VST imaging to select low-surface-brightness dwarf candidates without spectroscopic distances.

If this is right

  • The new sample increases the known dwarf population in these fields by roughly an order of magnitude.
  • Color gradients and structural parameters of the candidates are statistically consistent with those of previously studied dwarfs.
  • Projected positions allow reasonable associations of many candidates with NGC 5068, NGC 5084, or NGC 5087 as hosts.
  • The enlarged candidate list enables future statistical comparisons of satellite counts and spatial distributions with cosmological predictions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If distances are confirmed, the sample can be used to test whether these hosts show the same satellite-plane alignments reported around other nearby galaxies.
  • An order-of-magnitude increase in known dwarfs around a single host would tighten constraints on the faint end of the satellite luminosity function at distances less than 11 Mpc.
  • The same imaging depth and inspection method could be applied to additional fields in the VST-SMASH footprint to build a more complete census of dwarfs around other nearby galaxies.

Load-bearing premise

Visual inspection alone can reliably separate true dwarf galaxies at the distance of the target hosts from background galaxies and imaging artifacts.

What would settle it

Spectroscopic redshifts for a sizable fraction of the 47 candidates that place them well beyond 11 Mpc would show that most are background contaminants rather than satellites.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.21117 by Abdurro'uf, A. Unni, A. Venhola, C. Tortora, D. Carollo, F. Annibali, H. Su, L. K. Hunt, M. Baes, M. Gatto, N. R. Napolitano, R. Ragusa.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: RGB images of the selected dwarf candidates after the tagging and vetting stages of our visual classification. North is up and East is to the left. The horizontal white bar corresponds to 5 arcsec. Each cutout has a size equal to 10 times the effective radius in the r band of the galaxy. The assigned vote is given in parentheses. shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Surface brightness profile for dw1318−2153. Left panels: RGB color-composite image (top) and masked r-band image (bottom). The green ellipses correspond to the geometric mean of the bin intervals used to derive the SB profile shown in the right panel. Masked regions are highlighted in light gray. Right panel: Extinction-corrected r-band SB profile derived in this work (green circles with error bars) compar… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Distributions of the physical properties of the dwarf galaxy candidates. From top-left, the panels show the following quantities: central surface brightness (µ0,r) and effective surface brightness (µe,r), circularized effective radius (Re,r), Sérsic index (nr), Sérsic total magnitude (magr), Sérsic absolute magnitude (Mr), total stellar mass (log10 M⋆/M⊙, see how it is calculated in Sect. 4.2), and the g −… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Color magnitude diagrams. The g − r and r − i colors (measured within 1 Re) are shown on the left and on the right panels, respectively, as a function of the r-band absolute magnitude. Grey circles with black edges represent our sample adopting a reference distance of 26 Mpc, while cyan circles represent the dwarf galaxies from Venhola et al. (2018, V+18). According to the selection shown in [PITH_FULL_IM… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The Re (left panel) and Sérsic index (right panel) in the r band as a function of the r-band absolute magnitude. Grey circles with black edges represent our sample adopting a reference distance of 26 Mpc. Black solid lines indicate the median trends. Dashed and dot-dashed black lines show the effect of assuming distances of 5.2 and 40 Mpc, respectively. Cyan circles correspond to dwarf galaxies from Venhol… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: g − r colour gradients as a function of absolute magnitude (left panel) and stellar mass (right panel). Gradients measured from the observed data (open circles) and from the deconvolved Sérsic fits (gray circles with black edges) are shown, together with their median trends (dashed and solid lines, respectively). Uncertainties on the deconvolved Sérsic fits are also plotted. Colour gradients from Tortora e… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Spatial distribution of dwarf galaxy candidates and their potential host galaxies, superimposed to the r-band VST-SMASH mosaic. In the VST–SMASH background image, the brightest galaxies are clearly visible, along with saturated stars and their reflection halos, which are typical artefacts in VST images. Coloured circles indicate the positions of possible host galaxies from the HECATE catalog, with radii se… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Spatial distribution of dwarf galaxy candidates (ellipses) and their associated host galaxies (squares). Each dwarf candidate is coloured according to the host with the highest membership probability. If multiple hosts have membership probabilities within 25% of the highest proba￾bility, the dwarf galaxy shape is divided into wedges coloured according to each host. The dashed ellipses correspond to a radiu… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a study of dwarf galaxy candidates in the deepest optical imaging yet obtained of the field surrounding the nearby galaxies NGC 5068 and NGC 5084/NGC 5087, the latter two located in the peripheries of the Virgo Supercluster. This field, covering $\sim 2.6$ deg$^2$, was observed as part of the multi-band, wide-field and very deep data from VST-SMASH, a distance-limited program ($D < 11$ Mpc) that reaches $g$- and $r$-band surface brightness depths of $\mu \sim 30$ mag arcsec$^{-2}$. Using a two-step visual inspection procedure, we identify 47 dwarf galaxy candidates and perform the surface photometry of the sample and the fitting procedure with 1D S\'ersic model on their profiles. Only 4 galaxies were previously reported in the literature, augmenting by one order of magnitude the number of dwarfs discovered in these regions. The colors (median $g-r = 0.57$ and $r-i = 0.24$ mag) and structural properties of the dwarf candidates are consistent with the literature, as are their scaling relations with effective radius, S\'ersic index ($n < 2$), and absolute magnitude. We also investigate their central colour gradients, which exhibit significant scatter, and discuss them within the broader context of galaxy formation. We finally analyze their spatial distribution relative to potential host galaxies. We identify reasonable associations with NGC 5084, NGC 5087, and NGC 5068 as likely hosts for a significant fraction of the sample. Several candidates are at physically credible distances from NGC~5068, despite what their offset size-luminosity relation alone might indicate. Future spectroscopic and deeper imaging follow-up is required to determine distances and velocities, enabling robust association with hosts, studies of satellite distributions and counts, and comparisons with cosmological expectations for planes of satellites and dark matter models. (abridged)

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper presents deep VST-SMASH multi-band imaging (~2.6 deg², μ~30 mag arcsec^{-2}) of fields around NGC 5068 and NGC 5084/NGC 5087. Using a two-step visual inspection, the authors identify 47 dwarf galaxy candidates (only 4 previously known), perform surface photometry and 1D Sérsic fits, report median colors (g-r=0.57, r-i=0.24) and structural parameters (n<2) consistent with literature dwarfs, examine central color gradients and spatial distributions, and suggest associations with the target hosts while calling for spectroscopic confirmation.

Significance. If the visual classification isolates galaxies at D≲11 Mpc, the work would increase the known dwarf population in these regions by an order of magnitude, supplying new targets for satellite-system studies, planes-of-satellites tests, and comparisons with cosmological expectations. The achieved surface-brightness depth and the application of standard photometry/Sérsic procedures are strengths; the paper explicitly notes the need for follow-up distances.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / candidate selection] Abstract and candidate-selection section: the headline result (47 candidates, order-of-magnitude increase) rests on the two-step visual inspection separating true dwarfs at the target distances from background LSB contaminants or artifacts at comparable surface brightness. No completeness or contamination estimates (e.g., via injected sources or comparison fields) are referenced, and the text defers robust association and confirmation to future spectroscopy. This is a load-bearing uncertainty for the central claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. The manuscript would benefit from explicit reference to the exact criteria or decision tree used in the second step of the visual inspection.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review, recognition of the survey depth, and identification of the key uncertainty in candidate selection. We respond to the single major comment below and have made targeted revisions to strengthen the discussion of limitations without altering the core results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / candidate selection] Abstract and candidate-selection section: the headline result (47 candidates, order-of-magnitude increase) rests on the two-step visual inspection separating true dwarfs at the target distances from background LSB contaminants or artifacts at comparable surface brightness. No completeness or contamination estimates (e.g., via injected sources or comparison fields) are referenced, and the text defers robust association and confirmation to future spectroscopy. This is a load-bearing uncertainty for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the visual classification is central to the reported increase in candidates and that quantitative completeness/contamination estimates would reduce uncertainty. Section 3 details the two-step procedure (initial visual search followed by independent verification using morphology, color consistency with the red sequence, and exclusion of artifacts), which is a standard approach for LSB dwarf searches where automated detection is unreliable. We did not perform artificial source injections or comparison-field analyses, as these are resource-intensive for the complex VST background and were beyond the scope of this discovery paper. We have revised the abstract, Section 3, and conclusions to more explicitly quantify the reliance on visual inspection, discuss likely contaminant classes, and reiterate that all associations remain tentative pending spectroscopy. The reported structural parameters and colors provide internal consistency checks with the known dwarf population, supporting the sample's value as a candidate catalog for follow-up studies. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct observational catalog from visual inspection

full rationale

The paper's central result (identification of 47 dwarf candidates via two-step visual inspection, with photometry and Sersic fits) is obtained directly from the VST imaging data. No equations, fitted parameters, or predictions are presented that reduce by construction to the inputs. Properties are reported as measured and noted as consistent with external literature, without any load-bearing self-citation chain or ansatz smuggling. The work explicitly defers confirmation to future spectroscopy, confirming the derivation chain is self-contained against the raw observations rather than tautological.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters or invented entities stated. The visual classification threshold and distance assumptions for host association are implicit but not quantified.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Visual inspection by the team correctly identifies genuine dwarf galaxies at the distance of the target hosts.
    Central to the candidate list; stated in the two-step procedure description.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5990 in / 1187 out tokens · 19550 ms · 2026-06-26T14:06:46.006766+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Amorín, R., Aguerri, J. A. L., Muñoz-Tuñón, C., & Cairós, L. M. 2009, A&A, 501, 75

    2009

  2. [2]

    & Tosi, M

    Annibali, F. & Tosi, M. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 48

    2022

  3. [3]

    2024, A&A, 683, A182

    Baes, M., Mosenkov, A., Kelly, R., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A182

    2024

  4. [4]

    2018, SEP: Source Extraction and Photometry, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1811.004

    Barbary, K. 2018, SEP: Source Extraction and Photometry, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1811.004

    2018

  5. [5]

    R., Schlegel, D

    Blanton, M. R., Schlegel, D. J., Strauss, M. A., et al. 2005, AJ, 129, 2562

    2005

  6. [6]

    2008, ApJ, 674, 742

    Boselli, A., Boissier, S., Cortese, L., & Gavazzi, G. 2008, ApJ, 674, 742

    2008

  7. [7]

    Bullock, J. S. & Boylan-Kolchin, M. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 343

    2017

  8. [8]

    1983, AJ, 88, 804

    Caldwell, N. 1983, AJ, 88, 804

    1983

  9. [9]

    1993, MNRAS, 265, 1013

    Caon, N., Capaccioli, M., & D’Onofrio, M. 1993, MNRAS, 265, 1013

    1993

  10. [10]

    2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 581, A10

    Capaccioli, M., Spavone, M., Grado, A., et al. 2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 581, A10

    2015

  11. [11]

    2015, A&A, 581, A10

    Capaccioli, M., Spavone, M., Grado, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 581, A10

    2015

  12. [12]

    C., & Quinn, P

    Carignan, C., Cote, S., Freeman, K. C., & Quinn, P. J. 1997, AJ, 113, 1585

    1997

  13. [13]

    S., et al

    Cautun, M., Bose, S., Frenk, C. S., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 3838

    2015

  14. [14]

    2003, PASP, 115, 763

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763

    2003

  15. [15]

    D., & Tully, R

    Chiboucas, K., Karachentsev, I. D., & Tully, R. B. 2009, AJ, 137, 3009

    2009

  16. [16]

    & Carraro, G

    Chiosi, C. & Carraro, G. 2002, MNRAS, 335, 335 Crnojevi´c, D., Sand, D. J., Spekkens, K., et al. 2014, ApJL, 795, L35 Crnojevi´c, D., Sand, D. J., Spekkens, K., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 19

    2002

  17. [17]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.11800 de Boer, T

    Cruz, A., Brooks, A., Lisanti, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.11800 de Boer, T. J. L., Tolstoy, E., Saha, A., et al. 2011, A&A, 528, A119

    arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 446, 120

    Duc, P.-A., Cuillandre, J.-C., Karabal, E., et al. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 446, 120

    2015

  19. [19]

    K., Brewer, B

    Eigenthaler, P., Grebel, E. K., Brewer, B. J., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Jour- nal, 855, 142 Euclid Collaboration: Mellier, Y ., Abdurro’uf, Acevedo Barroso, J. A., et al. 2025, A&A, 697, A1 Euclid Collaboration: Quilley, L., Damjanov, I., de Lapparent, V ., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.15309

    arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    2012, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 200, 4

    Ferrarese, L., Côté, P., Cuillandre, J.-C., et al. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 200, 4

    2012

  21. [21]

    2012, MNRAS, 422, 1231

    Governato, F., Zolotov, A., Pontzen, A., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 1231

    2012

  22. [22]

    Graham, A. W. & Guzmán, R. 2003, AJ, 125, 2936

    2003

  23. [23]

    R., Duc, P.-A., et al

    Habas, R., Marleau, F. R., Duc, P.-A., et al. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 491, 1901

    2020

  24. [24]

    2024, PASJ, 76, 733

    Homma, D., Chiba, M., Komiyama, Y ., et al. 2024, PASJ, 76, 733

    2024

  25. [25]

    K., Annibali, F., Cuillandre, J.-C., et al

    Hunt, L. K., Annibali, F., Cuillandre, J.-C., et al. 2025, A&A, 697, A9

    2025

  26. [26]

    A., Lewis, G

    Ibata, R. A., Lewis, G. F., Conn, A. R., et al. 2013, Nature, 493, 62

    2013

  27. [27]

    2016, ApJ, 820, 42

    Iodice, E., Capaccioli, M., Grado, A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, 42

    2016

  28. [28]

    2016, A&A, 588, A89

    Javanmardi, B., Martínez-Delgado, D., Kroupa, P., et al. 2016, A&A, 588, A89

    2016

  29. [29]

    Karachentsev, I. D. & Kroupa, P. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 2805

    2024

  30. [30]

    D., Makarov, D

    Karachentsev, I. D., Makarov, D. I., & Kaisina, E. I. 2013, AJ, 145, 101

    2013

  31. [31]

    2014, ApJS, 215, 22

    Kim, S., Rey, S.-C., Jerjen, H., et al. 2014, ApJS, 215, 22

    2014

  32. [32]

    V ., Valenzuela, O., & Prada, F

    Klypin, A., Kravtsov, A. V ., Valenzuela, O., & Prada, F. 1999, ApJ, 522, 82

    1999

  33. [33]

    Koleva, M., Prugniel, P., De Rijcke, S., & Zeilinger, W. W. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 1643

    2011

  34. [34]

    E., Belokurov, V ., Torrealba, G., & Evans, N

    Koposov, S. E., Belokurov, V ., Torrealba, G., & Evans, N. W. 2015, ApJ, 805, 130

    2015

  35. [35]

    J., et al

    Kovlakas, K., Zezas, A., Andrews, J. J., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 1896 La Marca, A., Iodice, E., Cantiello, M., et al. 2022a, A&A, 665, A105 La Marca, A., Peletier, R., Iodice, E., et al. 2022b, A&A, 659, A92

    2021

  36. [36]

    2025, MNRAS, 544, 3936

    Lazar, I., Kaviraj, S., Martin, G., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3936

    2025

  37. [37]

    & Cooper, A

    Liao, L.-W. & Cooper, A. P. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 3999

    2023

  38. [38]

    R., Fekete, G., et al

    Lupton, R., Blanton, M. R., Fekete, G., et al. 2004, PASP, 116, 133

    2004

  39. [39]

    2014, A&A, 570, A13

    Makarov, D., Prugniel, P., Terekhova, N., Courtois, H., & Vauglin, I. 2014, A&A, 570, A13

    2014

  40. [40]

    R., Habas, R., Carollo, D., et al

    Marleau, F. R., Habas, R., Carollo, D., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.15335

    arXiv

  41. [41]

    2001, ApJ, 559, 754

    Mayer, L., Governato, F., Colpi, M., et al. 2001, ApJ, 559, 754

    2001

  42. [42]

    McConnachie, A. W. 2012, AJ, 144, 4

    2012

  43. [43]

    J., Bullock, J

    Mercado, F. J., Bullock, J. S., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 5121

    2021

  44. [44]

    2014, ApJ, 787, 37

    Merritt, A., van Dokkum, P., Abraham, R., & Zhang, J. 2014, ApJ, 787, 37

    2014

  45. [45]

    J., Zwaan, M

    Meyer, M. J., Zwaan, M. A., Webster, R. L., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 350, 1195

    2004

  46. [46]

    1999, ApJL, 524, L19 Müller, O., Jerjen, H., & Binggeli, B

    Moore, B., Ghigna, S., Governato, F., et al. 1999, ApJL, 524, L19 Müller, O., Jerjen, H., & Binggeli, B. 2015, A&A, 583, A79 Müller, O., Jerjen, H., & Binggeli, B. 2017, A&A, 597, A7 Müller, O., Pawlowski, M. S., Jerjen, H., & Lelli, F. 2018, Science, 359, 534 Muñoz, R. P., Eigenthaler, P., Puzia, T. H., et al. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 813, L15

    1999

  47. [47]

    Oke, J. B. & Gunn, J. E. 1983, ApJ, 266, 713

    1983

  48. [48]

    A., Navarro, J

    Oman, K. A., Navarro, J. F., Fattahi, A., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 3650

    2015

  49. [49]

    J., & Thuan, T

    Papaderos, P., Loose, H.-H., Fricke, K. J., & Thuan, T. X. 1996, A&A, 314, 59

    1996

  50. [50]

    2023, ApJS, 265, 57

    Paudel, S., Yoon, S.-J., Yoo, J., et al. 2023, ApJS, 265, 57

    2023

  51. [51]

    Pawlowski, M. S. 2023, in Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana, V ol. 94, 55

    2023

  52. [52]

    S., Famaey, B., Jerjen, H., et al

    Pawlowski, M. S., Famaey, B., Jerjen, H., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 1047

    2015

  53. [53]

    S., Ibata, R

    Pawlowski, M. S., Ibata, R. A., Bullock, J. S., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 2362

    2014

  54. [54]

    S., Müller, O., Taibi, S., et al

    Pawlowski, M. S., Müller, O., Taibi, S., et al. 2024, A&A, 688, A153

    2024

  55. [55]

    S., Pflamm-Altenburg, J., & Kroupa, P

    Pawlowski, M. S., Pflamm-Altenburg, J., & Kroupa, P. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 1109

    2012

  56. [56]

    & Governato, F

    Pontzen, A. & Governato, F. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 3464

    2012

  57. [57]

    R., Habas, R., et al

    Poulain, M., Marleau, F. R., Habas, R., et al. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 506, 5494

    2021

  58. [58]

    J., Davies, J

    Prole, D. J., Davies, J. I., Keenan, O. C., & Davies, L. J. M. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 478, 667

    2018

  59. [59]

    2023, A&A, 670, L20

    Ragusa, R., Iodice, E., Spavone, M., et al. 2023, A&A, 670, L20

    2023

  60. [60]

    2022, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9, 852810

    Ragusa, R., Mirabile, M., Spavone, M., et al. 2022, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9, 852810

    2022

  61. [61]

    2021, A&A, 651, A39

    Ragusa, R., Spavone, M., Iodice, E., et al. 2021, A&A, 651, A39

    2021

  62. [62]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.07083

    Ragusa, R., Tortora, C., Hunt, L., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.07083

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  63. [63]

    Sales, L. V . & Navarro, J. F. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 376

    2023

  64. [64]

    2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 481

    Sawala, T., Cautun, M., Frenk, C., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 481

    2023

  65. [65]

    Schlafly, E. F. & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103

    2011

  66. [66]

    Schombert, J. M. 2006, AJ, 131, 296

    2006

  67. [67]

    2024, ApJ, 976, 253

    Seo, C., Yoon, S.-J., Paudel, S., An, S.-H., & Moon, J.-S. 2024, ApJ, 976, 253

    2024

  68. [68]

    Simon, J. D. & Geha, M. 2007, ApJ, 670, 313

    2007

  69. [69]

    R., et al

    Spavone, M., Capaccioli, M., Napolitano, N. R., et al. 2017, Astronomy & As- trophysics, 603, A38

    2017

  70. [70]

    R., et al

    Spavone, M., Capaccioli, M., Napolitano, N. R., et al. 2017, Galaxies, 5, 31

    2017

  71. [71]

    R., et al

    Su, H., Li, R., Napolitano, N. R., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.13910

    arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    A., & van Dokkum, P

    Tal, T., Wake, D. A., & van Dokkum, P. G. 2012, ApJ, 751, L5 Article number, page 14 of 21 C. Tortora: VST-SMASH: paper II

    2012

  73. [73]

    2024, A&A, 682, A4

    Thuruthipilly, H., Junais, Pollo, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A4

    2024

  74. [74]

    F., et al

    Toloba, E., Guhathakurta, P., Peletier, R. F., et al. 2014, ApJS, 215, 17

    2014

  75. [75]

    R., et al

    Tortora, C., Busillo, V ., Napolitano, N. R., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.13589

    arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    R., Cardone, V

    Tortora, C., Napolitano, N. R., Cardone, V . F., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 144

    2010

  77. [77]

    2024, The Messenger, 193, 31

    Tortora, C., Ragusa, R., Gatto, M., et al. 2024, The Messenger, 193, 31

    2024

  78. [78]

    2021, A&A, 654, A40

    Trujillo, I., D’Onofrio, M., Zaritsky, D., et al. 2021, A&A, 654, A40

    2021

  79. [79]

    2018, A&A, 620, A165

    Venhola, A., Peletier, R., Laurikainen, E., et al. 2018, A&A, 620, A165

    2018

  80. [80]

    2019, A&A, 625, A143

    Venhola, A., Peletier, R., Laurikainen, E., et al. 2019, A&A, 625, A143

    2019

Showing first 80 references.