Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 25 references

A Sparkler in the Fireworks Galaxy: Discovery of an Ultraluminous X-ray Transient with a Strong Oxygen Line in NGC 6946

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A new X-ray source in NGC 6946 turned on between 2008 and 2012, has stayed ultraluminous since, and shows a strong O VIII line at 0.66 keV attributed to a massive outflow.

desk verdict A careful discovery paper for a new transient ULX with a striking oxygen line; the line's combined-spectrum significance deserves a check, but the paper is solid and warrants peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08293 v1 pith:OOXTYB3S submitted 2019-08-22 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR

Chen Wang (XMU) , Roberto Soria (UCAS/NAOC) , Junfeng Wang (XMU) This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords ultraluminousX-raysourcestransientsNGC6946super-EddingtonaccretionOVIIIemissionlinesoftspectroscopyultracompactbinariesspectralstates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the discovery of CXOU J203451.1+601043, an ultraluminous X-ray source in the spiral galaxy NGC 6946 that was absent from every observation before 2008 and has been detected at roughly $2$–$4\times10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$ in every observation since it first appeared in 2012. Its spectrum is generally soft but evolves: consistent with a broadened disk in 2012, transitional toward the super-soft regime in 2016, and harder again in 2018–2019 at nearly constant luminosity. The central new result is a strong emission line at $0.66\pm0.01$ keV, with equivalent width $\approx100$ eV and de-absorbed luminosity $\approx2\times10^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$, seen when the continuum was softest and identified as O VIII Ly$\alpha$. The authors interpret the line as the signature of a massive outflow, linking a cool Comptonized continuum with soft X-ray emission lines as two independent wind diagnostics, and speculate that the donor is an oxygen-rich white dwarf in an ultracompact binary. A sympathetic reader would care because it adds a rare, long-lived transient ULX whose wind signatures can be studied at CCD resolution and whose possible ultracompact nature would widen the known formation channels for ULXs.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by multi-epoch X-ray spectroscopy of archival Chandra, XMM-Newton, and Swift observations, interpreted through the empirical ULX spectral classification (broadened disk, classical soft ultraluminous, transitional-to-super-soft regimes) and through Comptonization fits in which a low electron temperature ($kT_e \approx 0.65$ keV) and high optical depth ($\tau \approx 13$) signal down-scattering in a wind. The central diagnostic object is the Gaussian emission-line residual at $0.66$ keV whose strength, narrow width, and presence only in the softest state identify it as an O VIII Ly$\alpha$ wind line rather than a continuum artifact; the assumed $7.7$ Mpc distance to NGC 6946 converts every count rate into the luminosities that define the ULX and the $\approx 2\times10^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$ line output.

What would settle it

Take a high-resolution soft X-ray spectrum of CXOU J203451.1+601043 during a soft state: if the 0.66 keV feature is O VIII Ly$\alpha$ from an outflow it should resolve into a line with a blueshift or P Cygni profile, whereas a finding that it is O VII He$\beta$ or stationary thermal plasma would undercut the wind and oxygen-rich-donor interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

CXOU J203451.1+601043 is a previously unrecognized transient ULX in NGC 6946 that turned on between 2008 February and 2012 May, remained at $\approx2$–$4\times10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$ in all later observations, and varied between spectral regimes: a broadened-disk state in 2012, a transitional state approaching the super-soft regime in 2016, and a harder state in 2018–2019 with no significant luminosity change. In its softest 2017 XMM-Newton spectrum the source shows an unresolved emission line at $E=(0.66\pm0.01)$ keV, equivalent width $\approx100$ eV, intrinsic FWHM $\lesssim30$ eV, and de-absorbed luminosity $\approx2\times10^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$ (about 10% of the total), significant at $>99.8\%$ regardless of continuum model. The authors identify the line as O VIII Ly$\alpha$ (rest energy 0.654 keV), argue that it comes from the ULX rather than diffuse gas, and interpret it as a massive outflow; the line is an order of magnitude more luminous than analogous lines in other soft ULXs. They present this as support for the view that the soft ultraluminous regime is produced by a thick, down-scattering wind whose optical depth along our line of sight sets the apparent spectral hardness. They further speculate, on the basis of the strong oxygen line and the oxygen-rich (O, Ne, Mg, Si) abundance pattern required by a plasma fit, that the donor is an oxygen-rich white dwarf in an ultracompact binary, which would make it the first ultracompact ULX candidate outside a globular cluster.

Load-bearing premise

Every luminosity in the paper, including the ULX classification and the oxygen-line luminosity, is computed from the assumed 7.7 Mpc distance to NGC 6946; if the older $\approx5.5$ Mpc distance were right, the 2012 source would fall below the ultraluminous threshold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A long-lived transient ULX can stay at or above $10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$ for at least seven years, so the census of transient ULXs must count systems that do not decay after a short outburst.
  • The 2017 spectrum places CXOU J203451.1+601043 in the transitional regime between ordinary ULXs and ultraluminous supersoft sources, supporting the idea that those classes differ mainly by the scattering optical depth of a wind along our line of sight.
  • A wind line from a ULX can be strong enough ($EW\approx100$ eV) to be detected and modelled at CCD resolution, so soft-state monitoring of nearby galaxies can find more such systems without high-resolution gratings.
  • If the oxygen-rich donor scenario holds, this is the first ultracompact ULX candidate outside a globular cluster, and its transient behaviour is a puzzle because a fully ionized disk in such a system should be stable against thermal-viscous outbursts.
  • When the source eventually declines, its decay track will discriminate between a stellar-mass black hole following the standard hardness-luminosity pattern and a neutron star switching between accretor and propeller states.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Line luminosity at about 10% of the total X-ray luminosity implies a genuinely massive wind; if the wind is the same medium that down-scatters the continuum, the line flux and the spectral downturn energy should track each other as the source changes state, a correlation that future monitoring of this source could test.
  • The faint optical counterpart at $M\approx-4$ mag is compatible with an early B star but also with an irradiated disk; if the white-dwarf donor scenario is right, the optical light should vary on the $\sim10$ minute orbital period the authors predict, which would separate the donor interpretation from the B-star interpretation.
  • An oxygen-rich C/O or O-Ne-Mg white-dwarf donor would make this system a scaled-up analogue of Galactic ultracompact X-ray binaries; comparing the X-ray line ratios (O VIII/O VII) with those systems could reveal whether the line forms in an outflow or on the disk surface.
  • The authors' wind interpretation predicts that the line should disappear or weaken when the continuum hardens; the 2018–2019 Swift data already show hardening, so a pointed soft X-ray observation in that state would provide a direct test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports the discovery of a new X-ray transient, CXOU J203451.1+601043, in NGC 6946, which was undetected before 2008 and has been detected from 2012 onward in Chandra, XMM-Newton, and Swift data. The authors model the 2012, 2016, and 2017 spectra with several continuum models plus a Gaussian emission line and find a strong line at 0.66 +/- 0.01 keV in the 2017 combined EPIC spectrum, with an equivalent width of roughly 100 eV and a de-absorbed luminosity of about 2 x 10^38 erg/s. They identify the line as O VIII Ly-alpha and interpret it as evidence of a massive outflow, connecting the soft Comptonized continuum with wind emission lines. They also document spectral variability, a candidate optical counterpart, and speculate that the donor star may be an oxygen-rich white dwarf in an ultracompact binary.

Significance. If the line detection holds, the source is a valuable addition to the small sample of ULXs with clearly detected soft X-ray wind lines, and it strengthens the empirical connection between the soft ultraluminous spectral state and line diagnostics. The analysis is careful in several respects: it tests multiple continuum models, uses likelihood-ratio simulations with 10,000 runs, verifies that the source is point-like with PSF checks, and uses narrow-band images to exclude diffuse gas or a pre-existing supernova remnant. The paper is also appropriately cautious in labeling the white-dwarf donor scenario as speculative. The main concerns are that the central line significance is established on the summed pn+MOS spectrum without per-detector spectral verification, and that the statistical procedure behind the quoted significance is not fully specified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3, Table 2] The significance of the 0.66 keV line (>99.8% from the likelihood-ratio test and Delta-chi-squared > 11.4) is computed on the summed EPIC-pn+MOS spectrum, but the paper does not present independent spectral fits or residual spectra for the pn and MOS detectors. The two instruments have different effective areas, gain scales, and calibration residuals near 0.5-0.7 keV, so a cross-calibration mismatch can in principle produce or enhance a narrow feature in the combined spectrum. Figure 8 shows narrow-band 0.60-0.70 keV images from pn and MOS separately, which is a useful check that the emission is point-like in both detectors, but it does not quantify the line significance per detector. Because the 0.66 keV line is the most outstanding property of the source and is the foundation for the outflow and oxygen-rich donor interpretations, I request per-detector spectral fits of the 2017 data, or at least pn-only and MOS-only residual plots with the line significance, and any necessary qualification of the detection claim if the per-detector signal is not significant.
  2. [Section 3.3, likelihood-ratio test] The paper states that 10,000 simulations were run for the likelihood-ratio test, but it does not state whether the Gaussian line energy and width were free parameters in the alternative model used for each simulated spectrum. If the line centroid was fixed at the best-fit value (0.66 keV), the quoted >99.8% significance does not account for the search over energy in the soft band and would be an overestimate. If the line parameters were free in the simulations, this should be stated explicitly. The same information is needed for the 2012 fit, where the significance is reported as only approximately 70%.
  3. [Section 1, Table 1] All luminosities in the paper scale with the assumed distance of 7.7 +/- 0.3 Mpc (Anand et al. 2018; Eldridge & Xiao 2019). At the older 5.5 Mpc distance, the 2012 XMM-Newton luminosity in Table 2 (L0.3-10 about 1.6 x 10^39 erg/s for the comptt model) would be about 0.8 x 10^39 erg/s, below the canonical 10^39 erg/s ULX threshold, and the 2012 Chandra luminosity in Table 1 would be about 0.6 x 10^39 erg/s. The statement in the abstract and in Section 1 that the source has remained at luminosities about 2-4 x 10^39 erg/s since 2012 therefore depends on the new distance. The later-epoch detections (2016, 2017) remain above 10^39 erg/s even at the old distance, so the transient ULX identification is not overturned, but the luminosity history and the absolute magnitudes in Table 4 should be presented with the distance sensitivity explicitly stated, or with a table of values at both distances.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2.1] The sentence 'We searched for point sources in each epoch with with wavdetect' contains a duplicated 'with'.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'at an energy of of' contains a duplicated 'of'.
  3. [Section 3.2] The sentence 'Count rates were extracted from the 0.3-10 keV band' appears twice in consecutive paragraphs.
  4. [Section 3.1] The text refers to 'SN 20017eaw' in one place; this should be 'SN 2017eaw'.
  5. [Figure 9 caption] The caption identifies the lower panel as a '2016 HST/WFC3 image in the F814W band', but the text and Table 4 identify that image as ACS/WFC; please correct the caption.
  6. [Table 2] Table 2 contains typographic artifacts such as '/greaterorsimilar' and '*' in the parameter entries; the final typeset version should be checked carefully for these symbols.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the source properties are measured, not derived from themselves.

full rationale

This is an observational discovery paper. The central claims are measurements: the transient appearance and luminosity of CXOU J203451.1+601043, its spectral evolution, and the detection of a 0.66 keV emission line. These are obtained from standard Chandra, XMM-Newton, and Swift data reduction and spectral fitting. No quantity is fitted to a subset of data and then renamed as a prediction; no continuum model is used to define the line in a way that forces its detection; the line significance is computed from the combined EPIC spectrum but is also inspected in separate pn and MOS narrow-band images, and the cross-calibration concern is a possible systematic effect, not circular reasoning. The spectral-state classification uses external empirical categories from the literature, and the proposed oxygen-rich donor scenario is explicitly speculation, not a derived result. The assumed distance to NGC 6946 scales luminosities but is an external, stated assumption, and the line energy, equivalent width, and line flux are distance-independent. Self-citations (e.g., Pinto et al. 2017, on which Soria is a coauthor) provide context for interpreting wind lines rather than the load-bearing justification for the line detection. The paper does not derive any quantity from a model that already contains that quantity, so no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard X-ray spectral fitting of public data. The only external input that materially changes the physical interpretation is the host distance; the spectral parameters and line detection are measurements, not assumptions. The white dwarf donor and the wind interpretation are domain assumptions or speculation, not independent evidence.

free parameters (4)
  • Line energy (Gaussian centroid) = 0.66 +/- 0.01 keV (2017)
    Fitted emission line centroid; identification with O VIII Ly-alpha depends on this value.
  • Line normalization (photon flux) = 2.7 (+2.3/-1.4) x 10^-5 ph cm^-2 s^-1 (2017, power-law continuum)
    Fitted line flux; yields equivalent width about 100 eV and de-absorbed luminosity about 2 x 10^38 erg/s.
  • Comptonization electron temperature kTe = 0.65 (+0.89) keV (2017, comptt model)
    Low kTe is the basis for the down-scattering wind interpretation.
  • Comptonization optical depth tau = 13.6 (+7.3/-0.8) (2017)
    High optical depth supports the thick-wind interpretation.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption NGC 6946 is at a distance of 7.7 +/- 0.3 Mpc
    Used to convert flux to luminosity; from Anand et al. 2018 and Eldridge & Xiao 2019, stated in Section 1.
  • domain assumption The 0.66 keV line is O VIII Ly-alpha
    Identification based on rest energy 0.654 keV; a minor contribution from O VII He-beta is possible (Section 3.3).
  • domain assumption Spectral softening in ULXs is caused by down-scattering in a thick wind
    Standard interpretation from the literature (Pinto et al. 2016, 2017; Middleton et al. 2015), adopted in Section 4.2.
  • domain assumption Empirical ULX spectral states (broadened disk, soft ultraluminous, super-soft) are physically meaningful
    Used to classify the source (Section 3.3); based on Sutton et al. 2013 and others.
invented entities (1)
  • O-Ne-Mg or CO white dwarf donor in an ultracompact binary
    purpose: Explains the strong oxygen line and faint optical counterpart; speculative donor scenario
    Proposed in Section 4.3; no direct evidence; the optical counterpart is consistent with a B star and the source is not in a globular cluster; a predicted roughly 10-minute period is not yet measured.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Sparkler in the Fireworks Galaxy: Discovery of an Ultraluminous X-ray Transient with a Strong Oxygen Line in NGC 6946." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OOXTYB3S

@misc{pith2026190808293,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Sparkler in the Fireworks Galaxy: Discovery of an Ultraluminous X-ray Transient with a Strong Oxygen Line in NGC 6946},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OOXTYB3S}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08293}
}
abstract

We discovered and studied an ultraluminous X-ray source (CXOU J203451.1+601043) that appeared in the spiral galaxy NGC 6946 at some point between 2008 February and 2012 May, and has remained at luminosities $\approx$2-4 $\times 10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$ in all observations since then. Our spectral modelling shows that the source is generally soft, but with spectral variability from epoch to epoch. Using standard empirical categories of the ultraluminous regimes, we find that CXOU J203451.1+601043 was consistent with a broadened disk state in 2012, but was in a transitional state approaching the super-soft regime in 2016, with substantial down-scattering of the hard photons (similar, for example, to the ultraluminous X-ray source in NGC 55). It has since hardened again in 2018-2019 without any significant luminosity change. The most outstanding property of CXOU J203451.1+601043 is a strong emission line at an energy of of $(0.66 \pm 0.01)$ keV, with equivalent width of $\approx$100 eV, and de-absorbed line luminosity of $\approx$2 $\times 10^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$, seen when the continuum spectrum was softest. We identify the line as OVIII Ly$\alpha$ (rest frame energy of 0.654 keV); we interpret it as a strong indicator of a massive outflow. Our finding supports the connection between two independent observational signatures of the wind in super-Eddington sources: a lower temperature of the Comptonized component, and the presence of emission lines in the soft X-ray band. We speculate that the donor star is oxygen-rich: a CO or O-Ne-Mg white dwarf in an ultracompact binary. If that is the case, the transient behaviour of CXOU J203451.1+601043 raises intriguing theoretical questions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08293 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. — Left panel: adaptively smoothed Chandra/ACIS image of NGC 6946, based on the stacked data from 2001 to 2004. Red represents the 0.3–1 keV band, green is for 1–2 keV, and blue for 2–8 keV. Right panel: adaptively smoothed Chandra/ACIS image, based on the stacked data from 2012 to 2017, showing the appearance of the transient ULX investigated in this paper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. — Gaussian-smoothed Swift/XRT image of the field around the transient ULX CXOU J203451.1+601043 (labelled as t-ULX) in NGC 6946, based on the stacked data from 2018 April to 2019 April, showing that the source is currently still ultraluminous. Red represents the 0.3–1 keV band, green is for 1–2 keV, and blue for 2–10 keV. The other bright off-nuclear sources labelled “1”, “2” and “3” correspond to ULX-1, ULX-2 and U… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. — Left panel: archival Gemini-North i-band image; the box marks the location of the transient ULX and is zoomed in on the right. Right panel: stellar field around CXOU J203451.1+601043, from an HST/ACS image in the F814W band. The blue circle shows the location of the transient ULX and has a 90% error radius of 0 ′′.2. 2000 4000 6000 8000 1037 1038 1039 1040 2000 4000 6000 8000 Time (MJD−50000) 1037 1038 1039 1040 L… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: — Long-term X-ray luminosity evolution of CXOU J203451.1+601043 in the 0.3–10 keV band (data from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: — Top left panel: background-subtracted Chandra/ACIS-S light curve from the first of the two exposures on 2016 September 28, binned to 500 s; it shows moderate intra-observational variability. Top right panel: as in the top left panel, for the second ACIS-S exposure on…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: — Unfolded X-ray spectra of CXOU J203451.1+601043 at three different epochs, based on the best-fitting Comptonization models listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: — Top left panel: best-fitting spectrum and χ 2 residuals for the 2012 XMM-Newton/EPIC dataset (pn and MOS combined), fitted with a Comptonization model (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: — Top panel: XMM-Newton/EPIC-MOS image from the 2017 dataset, filtered to the 0.60–0.70 keV band; it shows that the O VIII line emission is associated with the point-like ULX (labelled as t-ULX), and is not due to the contamination from diffuse hot gas. The other brigh…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: — Top panel: 2016 HST/ACS image in the F606W band. The yellow circle represents the 90% confidence limit of 0′′.2 for the ULX position. The only source marginally detected inside the circle has an apparent brightness of ≈26.4 mag and an absolute magnitude of ≈ −4.0 mag…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    High Mass X-ray Binaries: illuminating the passage fr om massive binaries to merging compact objects

    Abramowicz, M. A., Czerny, B., Lasota, J. P., & Szuszkiewicz , E. 1988, ApJ, 332, 646 Anand, G. S., Rizzi, L., & Tully, R. B. 2018, AJ, 156, 105 Arnaud, K. A. 1996, ASPC, 101, 17 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M. , et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123 Bachetti, M., Harrison, F. A., W alton, D. J., et al. 2014, Nat ure, 514, 202 Barmby, P., ...

    arXiv 1988

  2. [2]

    1 × 1037 4404 28.7 2002-11-25 <

    work page 2002

  3. [3]

    5 × 1037 4631 28.4 2004-10-22 <

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    0+0.6 −0.6 × 10−14

    0 × 1037 4632 25.2 2004-11-06 4633 26.6 2004-12-03 13435 20.4 2012-05-21 4 . 0+0.6 −0.6 × 10−14

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    1+0.2 −0.2 × 1039 17878 40.0 2016-09-28

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    6+0.1 −0.1 × 10−14

    8+0.4 −0.4 × 1039 19887 18.5 2016-09-28 19040 9.8 2017-06-11 0 . 6+0.1 −0.1 × 10−14

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    7+0.3 −0.3 × 1039 XMM-Newton/EPIC 0093641501 0.6 2003-04-18 < 1 × 10−14 < 2 × 1038 0093641601 2.2 2003-05-17 0093641701 1.2 2003-06-18 0200670101 3.9 2004-06-09 <

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    1 × 10−15 < 3 × 10370200670201 12.7 2004-06-11 0200670301 11.3 2004-06-13 0200670401 8.8 2004-06-25 0401360101 18.7 2006-05-23 < 2 × 10−15 <

    work page 2004

Show all 25 references
  1. [9]

    5 × 1037 0401360201 4.7 2006-06-02 0401360301 4.9 2006-06-18 0500730101 26.0 2007-11-08 <

    2006

  2. [10]

    6+0.1 −0.1 × 10−13

    2 × 10−15 < 2 × 1037 0500730201 31.7 2007-11-02 0691570101 109.3 2012-10-21 1 . 6+0.1 −0.1 × 10−13

    2007

  3. [11]

    6+0.1 −0.1 × 10−13

    6+0.1 −0.1 × 1039 0794581201 43.1 2017-06-01 0 . 6+0.1 −0.1 × 10−13

    2017

  4. [12]

    4+0.4 −0.4 × 10−13

    8+2.0 −0.1 × 1039 Swift/XRT 31113001 to 31113004 10 2008-02-04 to 2008-02-14 < 2 × 10−14 < 4 × 1038 49820001 to 49820003 7 2013-05-31 to 2013-06-04 1 . 4+0.4 −0.4 × 10−13

    2008

  5. [13]

    1+0.2 −0.2 × 10−13

    4+0.5 −0.5 × 1039 10130001 to 10130029 44 2017-05-13 to 2017-09-17 1 . 1+0.2 −0.2 × 10−13

    2017

  6. [14]

    2+0.3 −0.3 × 10−13

    6+0.4 −0.4 × 1039 94059001 to 94059044 43 2018-04-01 to 2018-12-27 2 . 2+0.3 −0.3 × 10−13

    2018

  7. [15]

    7+0.3 −0.3 × 10−13

    8+0.4 −0.4 × 1039 94059045 to 94059072 17 2019-01-06 to 2019-04-06 1 . 7+0.3 −0.3 × 10−13

    2019

  8. [16]

    5 and total column density NH = 4 × 1021 cm−2 (twice the Galactic line-of-sight value)

    2+0.4 −0.4 × 1039 a: for the Chandra observations, we estimated observed fluxes and intrinsic lu minosities (or their respective upper limits) in the 0.3–10 keV band with the ciao task srcflux, assuming a power-law model with photon index Γ = 2 . 5 and total column density NH = ...

    2016

  9. [17]

    See Table 2 for a comparison of flux and luminosity conversi ons using power-laws versus more complex spectral models. 13 TABLE 2 Best-fitting parameters of the EPIC spectra from 2012 and 20 17, and the ACIS spectrum from 2016 Model Parameters Values 2012 2016 2017 tbabs × tbab...

    2012

  10. [18]

    06 a: observed fluxes in the 0.3–10 keV bandb: for all spectral models, the de-absorbed luminosities L0. 3− 10 (0.3–10 keV band) were defined as 4 πd 2 times the de-absorbed fluxes c: Nbb = ( Rbb/D 10 )2 where Rbb is the source radius in km and D10 is the distance to the sourc...

    2017

  11. [19]

    20 a: Nbb = ( Rbb /D 10)2 where Rbb is the source radius in km and D10 is the distance to the source in units of 10 kpc (here, D10 = 770). b: Ndbb = ( Rin /D 10 )2 cos θ , where Rin is the apparent inner disk radius in km, D10 the distance to the source in units of 10 kpc, and...

    2004

  12. [20]

    15 2016-10-26 ACS-WFC F814W 2570 26 . 05 ±

    2016

  13. [21]

    1.— Left panel: adaptively smoothed Chandra/ACIS image of NGC 6946, based on the stacked data from 2001 to

    15 2018-01-05 WFC3-UVIS F555W 710 – – 2018-01-05 WFC3-UVIS F814W 780 – – 16 10.0 05.020:35:00.055.0 50.0 45.0 34:40.0 35.0 12:00.011:00.060:10:00.009:00.008:00.007:00.0 N E 60 arcsec 10.0 05.020:35:00.055.0 50.0 45.0 34:40.0 35.0 12:00.011:00.060:10:00.009:00.008:00.007:00.0 F...

    2018

  14. [24]

    1”, “2”, “3

    1 100.5 2 5 10−8 10−7 10−6 10−5 10−4 keV2 (Photons cm−2 s−1 keV−1) Energy (keV) Fig. 6.— Unfolded X-ray spectra of CXOU J203451.1+601043 at three di fferent epochs, based on the best-fitting Comptonization mod els listed in Table 2 ( tbabs × tbabs × (bbodyrad + comptt + gaussian...

    2019

  15. [25]

    Bottom panel: 2016 HST/WFC3 image in the F814W band

    0 mag. Bottom panel: 2016 HST/WFC3 image in the F814W band

    2016

  16. [28]

    Bottom right panel: as in the bottom left panel, for th e EPIC-pn observation of 2017 June

    Bottom left panel: background-subtra cted XMM-Newton/EPIC-pn light curve from 2012 October 21, binned to 1000 s. Bottom right panel: as in the bottom left panel, for th e EPIC-pn observation of 2017 June

    2012

  17. [2004]

    1”, “2” and “3

    Red represents the 0.3–1 keV band, green is for 1–2 keV, and blue f or 2–8 keV. Right panel: adaptively smoothed Chandra/ACIS image, based on the stacked data from 2012 to 2017, showing the appearance of the transient ULX investigated in this paper. 17 E N Swift/XRT (0.3-10 ke...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.