pith. sign in

arxiv: 1710.03161 · v2 · pith:OQTTAPITnew · submitted 2017-10-09 · 💱 q-fin.RM

Counterparty Trading Limits Revisited:CSAs, IM, SwapAgent(r), from PFE to PFL

classification 💱 q-fin.RM
keywords adjustedchallengescounterpartyexposurefuturelimitslossnetting
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The utility of Potential Future Exposure (PFE) for counterparty trading limits is being challenged by new market developments, notably widespread regulatory Initial Margin (using 99% 10-day exposure), and netting of trade and collateral flows. However PFE has pre-existing challenges w.r.t. portfolios/distributions, collateralization, netting set seniority, and overlaps with CVA. We introduce Potential Future Loss (PFL) which combines expected shortfall (ES) and loss given default (LGD) as a replacement for PFE. With two additional variants Adjusted PFL (aPFL) and Protected Adjusted PFL (paPFL) these deal with both new and pre-existing challenges. We provide a theoretical background and numerical examples.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.