Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 74 references

Surfaces with nonpositive magnetic curvature

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read On negatively curved surfaces, magnetic flows remain kinematic-expansive and admit equilibrium states even when magnetic curvature is merely nonpositive; orbit-equivalence to the geodesic flow holds exactly when no magnetically flat strip…

desk verdict Substantial geometric program for magnetic flows at the threshold of hyperbolicity, but the key kinematic-expansivity theorem has a proof error that leaves the equilibrium-state result unproven. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.13534 v1 pith:OR5LF5R3 submitted 2026-08-13 math.DS math.DG

Boris Hasselblatt , JinCheng Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DSmath.DG MSC 37D4037D35
keywords magneticflowstwistedgeodesichyperbolicdynamicsnonpositivecurvatureequilibriumstatesboundarykinematic-expansivityorthospheres
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies magnetic (twisted geodesic) flows on closed negatively curved surfaces at the edge of hyperbolicity, where the magnetic curvature $K+\mu^2$ is allowed to vanish somewhere while the underlying surface curvature stays negative. It sets out to show that the main dynamical conclusions familiar from geodesic flows survive under this weaker, nonuniform hyperbolicity: a magnetic boundary at infinity, visibility, dense periodic orbits, topological transitivity, and the existence of equilibrium states. The central surprise is that shearing along magnetically flat strips separates orbits linearly in time, so the flow remains kinematic-expansive even where ordinary expansivity and orbit-equivalence to the geodesic flow fail. The result is a clean dichotomy: ordinary expansivity and orbit-equivalence hold exactly in the absence of magnetically flat strips, while kinematic-expansivity, entropy-expansivity, and equilibrium states hold for every such flow.

What carries the argument

The engine is the $\mu$-magnetic Jacobi equation for the orthogonal component, $\ddot{y}+(K+\mu^2)y=0$, coupled to the tangential component by $\dot{x}=\mu y$. Under $K_\mu\le 0$ the function $y$ is convex, which provides comparison bounds, stability of asymptotic magnetic geodesics, and the dichotomy between exponential separation and flat parallel Jacobi fields. In a magnetically flat strip the equations integrate to the shear matrix $Df^\mu_t=\begin{pmatrix}1&\mu t\\0&1\end{pmatrix}$, which separates orbits linearly in time. The Knieper metric $d_K(v,w)=\max_{t\in[0,1]}d(\gamma_v(t),\gamma_w(t))$ converts that shear into kinematic-expansivity, and hence into entropy-expansivity of the time-1 map. Magnetic orthospheres, defined as curves orthogonal to families of asymptotic magnetic geodesics, supply the $C^2$ regularity needed for strong (un)stable spaces on the regular set.

What would settle it

Search for a closed negatively curved surface and a value of $\mu$ with $K+\mu^2\le 0$ and $K+\mu^2<0$ somewhere for which the $\mu$-magnetic exponential map fails to be a covering map, for example by numerically finding a nontrivial $\mu$-magnetic Jacobi field whose orthogonal component $y(t)$ vanishes at two distinct times; such a magnetic conjugate pair would break the quoted covering-map theorem and with it the uniqueness of magnetic geodesics on which the paper's boundary and flat-strip results rest.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a closed surface with $K<0$ and magnetic parameter $\mu$ satisfying $K_\mu=K+\mu^2\le 0$, the $\mu$-magnetic flow is weakly hyperbolic rather than uniformly hyperbolic. The paper establishes that each such flow has a magnetic boundary homeomorphic to the usual ideal boundary, that any two distinct boundary points are joined by a magnetic geodesic whenever $K_\mu<0$ somewhere, and that multiple connecting magnetic geodesics occur exactly along magnetically flat Euclidean strips filled with singular orbits. It proves that uniqueness of connecting magnetic geodesics (condition (H3)) is equivalent both to ordinary expansivity and to orbit-equivalence with the underlying geodesic flow. Without that uniqueness, shearing along flat strips destroys expansivity but still separates orbits, so the flow is kinematic-expansive and its time-1 map is entropy-expansive; consequently every Bowen-bounded potential with finite pressure has an equilibrium state, including a measure of maximal entropy. The paper also shows the natural magnetic distance is asymmetric and satisfies only a partial magnetic triangle inequality, and it develops magnetic orthospheres as $C^2$ substitutes for horospheres, yielding strong stable and unstable spaces on regular vectors.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes without proof a theorem of Adachi: under $K<0$ and $K+\mu^2\le 0$, the $\mu$-magnetic exponential map from any point of the universal cover is a covering map; if that premise fails, the uniqueness of magnetic geodesics and everything built on it collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The magnetic boundary at infinity is homeomorphic to the Riemannian ideal boundary, and under (H2) every pair of distinct boundary points is joined by a magnetic geodesic with distinct forward and backward endpoints.
  • Under (H2), periodic orbits are dense, regular periodic vectors are dense, and the flow is topologically transitive with nonwandering set equal to the entire unit tangent bundle.
  • Ordinary expansivity and orbit-equivalence to the geodesic flow each hold exactly under (H3), the absence of magnetically flat strips.
  • Even when flat strips are present, the time-1 map is entropy-expansive, so every Bowen-bounded potential with finite pressure has an equilibrium state, including a measure of maximal entropy.
  • The natural magnetic distance is not a metric: it is asymmetric, fails the triangle inequality on one side of a magnetic segment, and obeys only a partial triangle inequality; magnetic orthospheres are $C^2$ and support strong stable and unstable spaces on regular vectors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the covering-map premise is valid, the shear picture suggests a magnetic translation length that varies across flat strips; measuring that variation would give a magnetic marked length spectrum testable by comparing periods of nearby magnetic geodesics.
  • Editorial inference: because entropy-expansivity comes from a bounded spanning set across flat strips, entropy and pressure computations for such flows may be reducible to local measurements inside strips, which is numerically accessible.
  • Editorial inference: the $C^2$ orthosphere construction opens the way to a Pesin-type stable manifold theory on the dense regular set; the open continuity question for orthospherical leaves as the boundary point varies is the natural next step toward uniqueness of equilibrium states.
  • Editorial inference: a direct numerical experiment integrating magnetic geodesics in a flat-strip region should show orthogonal separation growing linearly at rate $\mu t$, matching the shear matrix, and exponential separation only where $K_\mu<0$; this cleanly separates the weakly hyperbolic regime from the uniformly hyperbolic one.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies unit-speed magnetic (twisted geodesic) flows on closed negatively curved surfaces under the assumption (H1) of nonpositive magnetic curvature. It constructs a magnetic boundary homeomorphic to the Riemannian boundary, proves a magnetic visibility theorem, characterizes magnetically flat surfaces, develops a theory of magnetic flat strips, proves topological transitivity and density of periodic orbits, establishes orbit-equivalence to the geodesic flow under (H3), and claims kinematic-expansivity, entropy-expansivity of the time-one map, and existence of equilibrium states. A later part of the paper analyzes the failure of the magnetic triangle inequality and defines magnetic B-functions and orthospheres, proving their C^2 regularity. The central dynamical applications, especially the existence of equilibrium states, rest on Theorem 3.78, whose proof is the main point of concern.

Significance. If the proof gap in Theorem 3.78 is repaired, the paper would be a substantial contribution: it extends several nonpositive-curvature tools—boundary at infinity, visibility, flat-strip rigidity, and equilibrium states—to the magnetic setting, and it explicitly identifies the shear/twist of the magnetic flow as the mechanism producing kinematic expansivity. The paper is careful and extensive, with precise statements of limitations and open questions (Conjecture 3.36, Remarks 4.11 and 4.17), and it builds on cited external results rather than on fitted parameters. The main obstruction is the proof of the kinematic-expansivity theorem, which currently contains an invalid inequality and an inconsistent use of the function beta; since Proposition 3.79 and Theorem 3.80 depend on it, the advertised ergodic-theoretic conclusions are not established as written.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.7.2, Theorem 3.78, Eq. (39)] The proof's separation lower bound is invalid. For the cross-section c ↦ Γ(c,t), the tangent vector is the Jacobi field J_r(t) = x_r(t)γ'_r(t) + y_r(t)iγ'_r(t), so the length of the cross-section is ∫_0^R sqrt(x_r(t)^2 + y_r(t)^2) dr, which is at least ∫_0^R |x_r(t)| dr. The Riemannian distance between γ_v(t) and γ_w(t) is at most the length of this cross-section, not at least, because distance is the infimum of lengths over all curves. Thus the displayed inequality d(γ_v(t),γ_w(t)) ≥ ∫_0^R |x_r(t)| dr reverses the standard length-distance bound, and no argument is given that the cross-section is minimizing or that the coefficient x_r defines a 1-Lipschitz coordinate on the strip. Since (39) is the only mechanism producing δ-separation in the flat-strip case, Theorem 3.78, and with it Proposition 3.79 and Theorem 3.80, are not established as written.
  2. [§3.7.2, Theorem 3.78, definition of β and final paragraph] The use of β in the final paragraph is order-inconsistent. Since β(l) = inf{d(p,q) : d̃(p,q) = l}, β^{-1}(ε) is a magnetic travel time, whereas d_K(w,v) is a Riemannian distance. For w = f_t v, the available lower bound is d(γ_v(0),γ_v(t)) ≥ β(t) because this pair has magnetic distance t, so |t| ≥ ε yields d ≥ β(ε), not d ≥ β^{-1}(ε). Monotonicity of β does not imply β(t) ≥ β^{-1}(ε) for t ≥ ε; indeed β(l) ≤ l, so β^{-1}(ε) can be much larger than ε. Consequently the choice δ = ½β^{-1}(ε) does not yield the claimed conclusion that |t| < ε. This is a second independent gap in the same theorem.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.1, Theorem 3.10 and Corollary 3.11] Theorem 3.10 is quoted from [Ada97] without stating its hypotheses; since Corollary 3.11 underpins the magnetic distance, the boundary construction, visibility, and flat-strip theory, please state the exact hypotheses (including any compactness or regularity conditions) and give a precise reference, or include a proof sketch.
  2. [§3.2, Proposition 3.26 proof] The displayed estimate 'd(γ_δ(r_δ(t)), γ_0(t) ≤ ...' is missing a closing parenthesis, and the family of reparametrizations r_s should be defined before it is used.
  3. [§4.3, Proposition 4.19 proof] In the estimate near (55), the expression 'µ(x_1 − x_2) + (˙y_1 − ˙x_2)' appears to contain a typo and should presumably read 'µ(x_1 − x_2) + (˙y_1 − ˙y_2)'.
  4. [§3.4, Theorem 3.42 proof] In item (5) of the proof, the notation 'byξ' is undefined and probably should be an arc such as 'cyξ'; please clarify.
  5. [§3.7.2, Theorem 3.78, Eq. (38)] The function β is described as continuous and increasing, but the proof only needs a nondecreasing function with the stated separation property; please state whether β is strictly increasing or, if not, explain how the inverse β^{-1} is defined.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the magnetic-flow results are derived from definitions and external results, not from self-referential reductions.

full rationale

The paper's central claims (magnetic boundary identification, visibility, flat-strip rigidity, orbit-equivalence, kinematic-expansivity, entropy-expansivity, and equilibrium states) are obtained from the stated assumptions (H1) by geometric arguments that rest on external cited results: Adachi's covering-map theorem [Ada97, Theorem 3] is the key external input; visibility is adapted from Eberlein--O'Neill [EO73]; orbit-equivalence extends Grognet [Gro99b]; entropy-expansivity and equilibrium states are channeled through Climenhaga--Thompson [CT16]. No fitted parameter is later relabeled as a prediction, no quantity is defined in terms of the result it is meant to establish, and no load-bearing premise is justified solely by a citation to the present authors' own prior work. The self-citations that do occur ([FH19], [KH95], [HK02]) are used for standard background definitions and facts (Liouville measure, Bowen balls, expansivity, Morse lemma) and are not load-bearing for the new theorems. The paper is also explicit about its genuine open points and limitations (e.g., Remark 4.11 on convergence of the magnetic Busemann analogue, Remark 4.17 on continuity in the boundary point, Conjecture 3.36, and the open uniqueness question for equilibrium states), which is the opposite of a circular derivation. The skeptical concern that the proof of Theorem 3.78 may reverse the length-versus-distance inequality or misuse β is a potential correctness gap in establishing kinematic-expansivity, not a circular reduction: the conclusion is not assumed in the definition of the Knieper metric, in the definition of β, or anywhere in the hypotheses. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited from the text, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim rests on standard hyperbolic geometry of the universal cover, the standing assumption K<0 and constant µ, and Adachi's comparison theorem giving the covering property of the magnetic exponential map. No free parameters are fitted, and no ad hoc entities are introduced beyond mathematical definitions.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Standing assumption (H0): K < 0 on the closed surface
    Definition 1.1; the universal cover is a Hadamard surface, used for visibility, ideal boundary, and north-south dynamics of the geodesic flow.
  • domain assumption Magnetic structure (g, µΩ_g) with h ≡ 1 and constant real µ
    Section 2.3 onward; all main results are stated for this constant-intensity case, so K_µ = K + µ².
  • domain assumption Theorem 3.10 (Adachi): the µ-magnetic exponential map is a covering map under (H1)
    Quoted from [Ada97, Theorem 3]; used to prove unique µ-magnetic geodesics between points (Corollary 3.11), which underlies the magnetic distance, boundary, and flat strips.
  • standard math Classical geodesic flow facts on negatively curved closed surfaces: unique connecting geodesics, dense axis endpoints, north-south dynamics
    Propositions 2.30, 2.35, 2.36; used throughout Sections 3.2 to 3.6 to build the magnetic boundary and prove density of periodic orbits.
  • standard math Climenhaga-Thompson theorem: entropy-expansive time-1 maps admit equilibrium states for Bowen-bounded potentials
    Theorem 2.43 [CT16, Proposition 3.7 and 4.15]; used in Theorem 3.80 to obtain equilibrium states.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Surfaces with nonpositive magnetic curvature." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OR5LF5R3

@misc{pith2026260813534,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Surfaces with nonpositive magnetic curvature},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OR5LF5R3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13534}
}
read the original abstract

We study weakly hyperbolic magnetic (or twisted geodesic) flows of negatively curved surfaces (with nonpositive ''magnetic curvature") with a view to topological dynamics and ergodic theory, using their large-scale geometry on the universal cover.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.13534 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Chord and angle in Definition 3.18 subtended by C ′ (0) and vt := g ′ C,t(0) ∈ T 1 C(0)Σ for any ˜ t ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. boundary chord and endpoint Remark 3.23. Here, γ([0,∞)) need not have finite Hausdorff distance from gv([0, ∞)). Horizontal lines in the upper half-plane model of H2 as 1-magnetic geodesics provide an example: their endpoint corresponds to vertical geodesics, whose neighborhoods of size r do not contain any 1-magnetic geodesic for any r > 0. In contrast, the µ-magnetic flow of Σ with negative µ-magnetic magnetic cur… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. γ1(∞) = γ2(∞) ⇒ γ1[∞] = γ2[∞] We first show γ1(∞) = γ2(∞) ⇒ γ1[∞] = γ2[∞] by contraposition. Let g1, g2 be forward boundary chords (Definition 3.22) of γ1 and γ2 respectively, and let g:=gγ1,T (Definition 3.18) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Variation ∆(t, s) in Definition 3.32 Lemma 3.33 ([Ada96, p. 229]). Suppose (Σ, µ) satisfies (H1). With notations from Defi￾nition 3.32, we have (1) Vt(s) ̸= 0 for any (t, s) ∈ R × R≥0; (2) ∆ is injective: for t1 ̸= t2, geodesics ∆(t1, ·) and ∆(t2, ·) do not intersect o…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Geodesic connecting γ(T) and γ(T1) in Lemma 3.37 Proof. After reparametrization, assume T0 = 0. Consider the variation ∆ of geodesics or￾thogonal to γ from Definition 3.32. We claim that lims→∞ ∆(T, s) = γ(∞) for all T ≥ 0, and this implies η(T) = π/2 for all T ≥ 0 by …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Theorem 3.38 (3) ⇒ (1) that γ(−∞) = x and γ(∞) = y, where γ(±∞) are from Definition 3.17 (or equivalently, Definition 3.22 by Proposition 3.31). If Kµ < 0, then µ-magnetic geodesics are quasi-geodesics, so the Hausdorff distance be￾tween a µ-magnetic geodesic and its b…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Convergence of tn intersection of η and l is a point l(t∗) with t∗ ≥ tn for all n because otherwise, η(R)∩γn(R) ⊃ {q1, q2} for some sufficiently large n as indicated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Endpoints of γ and possibilities for γxm(∞) Magnetic visibility (Theorem 3.42) guarantees that every geodesic is the boundary chord of some hyperbolic µ-magnetic geodesic. We also have the following observation which will be used in the proof of orbit-equivalence (Prop…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Topological transitivity (2) ⇒ (1) and (3) ⇒ (1) are immediate by contraposition since Reg = ∅ for any µ￾magnetically flat surface. Next we prove the contrapositive of (1) ⇒ (2) and of (1) ⇒ (3). If v ∈ Sing has a dense orbit, then T 1Σ = O(v) ⊂ Sing by Corollary 2.20,…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Proposition 4.1 Let γs(t) := Γp(s, t) and ηs(t) := Γq(s, t). Denote by Js the µ-magnetic Jacobi field of Γp along γs and by J˜ s the µ-magnetic Jacobi field of Γq along ηs for all s ∈ [0, 1]. It is obvious that Js(0) = J˜ s( ˜d(r, q)) = 0. From (18) and (21), we have …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Magnetic triangle inequality fails for intermediate points in the shaded region for any t Proof. For t ∈ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Definition 4.13 (2) Ft : Σ˜ × Σ × Σ˜ → R by Ft(p, z, q) = ( −Tpzq(0), z ∈ Σ˜, −Tpγ(t)q(0), z ∈ Σ( ˜ ∞); (3) q 7→ Bpz(q) = Bµ pz(q) := F(p, z, q) := limt→∞ Ft(p, z, q) as the stable µ-magnetic B￾function determined by p and z (Bpz(q) is well defined by Proposition 4.16…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Tsukuba J

    Adachi, Toshiaki , TITLE =. Tsukuba J. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1996 , NUMBER =. doi:10.21099/tkbjm/1496162994 , URL =

    work page arXiv 1996

  2. [2]

    Adachi, Toshiaki , TITLE =. Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 1997 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1017/S0013091500023737 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1017/s0013091500023737 1997

  3. [3]

    Ergodic Theory Dynam

    Grognet, St\'ephane , TITLE =. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems , FJOURNAL =. 1999 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1017/S0143385799126634 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1017/s0143385799126634 1999

  4. [4]

    1969 , PAGES =

    Anosov, Dmitri , TITLE =. 1969 , PAGES =

    work page 1969

  5. [5]

    and Paternain, Miguel , TITLE =

    Paternain, Gabriel P. and Paternain, Miguel , TITLE =. International. 1996 , ISBN =

    work page 1996

  6. [6]

    2005 , PAGES =

    Burns, Keith and Gidea, Marian , TITLE =. 2005 , PAGES =

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    , TITLE =

    Burns, Keith and Paternain, Gabriel P. , TITLE =. Nonlinearity , FJOURNAL =. 2002 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1088/0951-7715/15/2/305 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1088/0951-7715/15/2/305 2002

  8. [8]

    , TITLE =

    Eberlein, Patrick B. , TITLE =. 1996 , PAGES =

    1996

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    Heintze, Ernst and Im Hof, Hans-Christoph , TITLE =. J. Differential Geometry , FJOURNAL =. 1977 , NUMBER =

    1977

  2. [10]

    Eberlein, Patrick , TITLE =. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 1972 , PAGES =. doi:10.2307/1996132 , URL =

    1972 doi

  3. [11]

    Ballmann, Werner , TITLE =. Math. Ann. , FJOURNAL =. 1982 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF01456836 , URL =

    1982 doi

  4. [12]

    Eberlein, Patrick , TITLE =. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 1973 , PAGES =. doi:10.2307/1996689 , URL =

    1973 doi

  5. [13]

    , TITLE =

    Climenhaga, Vaughn and Thompson, Daniel J. , TITLE =. Adv. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2016 , PAGES =. doi:10.1016/j.aim.2016.07.029 , URL =

    2016 doi

  6. [14]

    , TITLE =

    Burns, Keith and Climenhaga, Vaughn and Fisher, Todd and Thompson, Daniel J. , TITLE =. Geom. Funct. Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 2018 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00039-018-0465-8 , URL =

    2018 doi

  7. [15]

    Knieper, Gerhard , TITLE =. Ann. of Math. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 1998 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2307/120995 , URL =

    1998 doi

  8. [16]

    , TITLE =

    Climenhaga, Vaughn and Fisher, Todd and Thompson, Daniel J. , TITLE =. Nonlinearity , FJOURNAL =. 2018 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1088/1361-6544/aab1cd , URL =

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    1982 , PAGES =

    Walters, Peter , TITLE =. 1982 , PAGES =

    1982

  10. [18]

    Nonlinearity , FJOURNAL =

    Chen, Dong and Kao, Lien-Yung and Park, Kiho , TITLE =. Nonlinearity , FJOURNAL =. 2020 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1088/1361-6544/ab5c06 , URL =

    2020 doi

  11. [19]

    1995 , PAGES =

    Katok, Anatole and Hasselblatt, Boris , TITLE =. 1995 , PAGES =. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511809187 , URL =

    1995 doi

  12. [20]

    Katok, Anatole , TITLE =. J. Mod. Dyn. , FJOURNAL =. 2007 , NUMBER =. doi:10.3934/jmd.2007.1.545 , URL =

    2007 doi

  13. [21]

    [2019] 2019 , PAGES =

    Fisher, Todd and Hasselblatt, Boris , TITLE =. [2019] 2019 , PAGES =. doi:10.4171/200 , URL =

    2019 doi

  14. [22]

    2016 , PAGES =

    Borthwick, David , TITLE =. 2016 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-33877-4 , URL =

    2016 doi

  15. [23]

    Tohoku Math

    Gouda, Norio , TITLE =. Tohoku Math. J. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 1997 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2748/tmj/1178225145 , URL =

    1997

  16. [24]

    Assenza, Valerio and Reber, James Marshall and Terek, Ivo , TITLE =. Comm. Math. Phys. , FJOURNAL =. 2025 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00220-024-05166-5 , URL =

    2025 doi

  17. [25]

    Pacific J

    Eberlein, Patrick and O'Neill, Barrett , TITLE =. Pacific J. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1973 , PAGES =

    1973

  18. [26]

    , TITLE =

    Wojtkowski, Maciej P. , TITLE =. Fund. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2000 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4064/fm-163-2-177-191 , URL =

    2000 doi

  19. [27]

    Artin, Emil , TITLE =. Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg , FJOURNAL =. 1924 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF02954622 , URL =

    1924 doi

  20. [28]

    Hopf, Eberhard , TITLE =. Ber. Verh. S\"achs. Akad. Wiss. Leipzig Math.-Phys. Kl. , FJOURNAL =. 1939 , PAGES =

    1939

  21. [29]

    , TITLE =

    Pesin, Yakov B. , TITLE =. Uspehi Mat. Nauk , FJOURNAL =. 1977 , NUMBER =

    1977

  22. [30]

    , TITLE =

    Pesin, Yakov B. , TITLE =. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. , FJOURNAL =. 1977 , NUMBER =

    1977

  23. [31]

    Uspehi Mat

    Anosov, Dmitri and Sinai, Yakov , TITLE =. Uspehi Mat. Nauk , FJOURNAL =. 1967 , NUMBER =

    1967

  24. [32]

    The collected works of

    Katok, Anatole , TITLE =. The collected works of. [2024] 2024 , ISBN =

    2024

  25. [33]

    Comtet, Alain , TITLE =. Ann. Physics , FJOURNAL =. 1987 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(87)90098-4 , URL =

    1987 doi

  26. [34]

    Sunada, Toshikazu , TITLE =. Proc. KAIST Math. Ann , FJOURNAL =. 1993 , NUMBER =

    1993

  27. [35]

    , TITLE =

    Newhouse, Sheldon E. , TITLE =. Ann. of Math. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 1989 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2307/1971492 , URL =

    1989 doi

  28. [36]

    Dynamical systems (

    Parry, William , TITLE =. Dynamical systems (. 1988 , ISBN =. doi:10.1007/BFb0082850 , URL =

    1988 doi

  29. [37]

    Discrete Contin

    Pollicott, Mark , TITLE =. Discrete Contin. Dynam. Systems , FJOURNAL =. 1996 , NUMBER =. doi:10.3934/dcds.1996.2.153 , URL =

    1996 doi

  30. [38]

    , TITLE =

    Paternain, Gabriel P. , TITLE =. 1999 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1600-1 , URL =

    1999 doi

  31. [39]

    , TITLE =

    Paternain, Gabriel P. , TITLE =. Pacific J. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2006 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2140/pjm.2006.225.301 , URL =

    2006 doi

  32. [40]

    Israel J

    Peyerimhoff, Norbert and Siburg, Karl Friedrich , TITLE =. Israel J. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2003 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/BF02776061 , URL =

    2003 doi

  33. [41]

    , TITLE =

    Burns, Keith and Matveev, Vladimir S. , TITLE =. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 2006 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-05-08196-7 , URL =

    2006 doi

  34. [42]

    Journal of Mathematical Physics , year=

    Effective action on the hyperbolic plane in a constant external field , author=. Journal of Mathematical Physics , year=

  35. [43]

    Rigidity of magnetic flows for compact surfaces , JOURNAL =

    Gomes, Jos\'e. Rigidity of magnetic flows for compact surfaces , JOURNAL =. 2008 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/j.crma.2008.01.011 , URL =

    2008 doi

  36. [44]

    and Pnueli, Adiel , title =

    Avron, Joseph E. and Pnueli, Adiel , title =. Ideas and Methods in Quantum and Statistical Physics , volume =

  37. [45]

    and Paternain, Miguel , TITLE =

    Paternain, Gabriel P. and Paternain, Miguel , TITLE =. Nonlinearity , FJOURNAL =. 1997 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1088/0951-7715/10/1/008 , URL =

    1997 doi

  38. [46]

    , TITLE =

    Paternain, Gabriel P. , TITLE =. Math. Res. Lett. , FJOURNAL =. 1997 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4310/MRL.1997.v4.n6.a7 , URL =

    1997 doi

  39. [47]

    Grognet, St\'ephane , TITLE =. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar\'e. 1999 , NUMBER =

    1999

  40. [48]

    , TITLE =

    Lee, John M. , TITLE =. 2018 , PAGES =

    2018

  41. [49]

    2002 , PAGES =

    Handbook of dynamical systems. 2002 , PAGES =

    2002

  42. [50]

    Myers, Sumner Byron and Steenrod, Norman Earl , TITLE =. Ann. of Math. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 1939 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2307/1968928 , URL =

    1939 doi

  43. [51]

    , TITLE =

    Hedlund, Gustav A. , TITLE =. Ann. of Math. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 1934 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2307/1968495 , URL =

    1934 doi

  44. [52]

    Eberlein, Patrick , TITLE =. Ann. of Math. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 1972 , PAGES =. doi:10.2307/1970869 , URL =

    1972 doi

  45. [53]

    Illinois J

    Chen, Su Shing and Eberlein, Patrick , TITLE =. Illinois J. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1980 , NUMBER =

    1980

  46. [54]

    The geometry of geodesics and the eigenfunctions of the

    Karpelevi. The geometry of geodesics and the eigenfunctions of the. Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL=. 1967 , PAGES =

    1967

  47. [55]

    and O'Neill, Barrett , TITLE =

    Bishop, Richard L. and O'Neill, Barrett , TITLE =. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 1969 , PAGES =. doi:10.2307/1995057 , URL =

    1969 doi

  48. [56]

    Gerber, Marlies and Wilkinson, Amie , TITLE =. J. Differential Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 1999 , NUMBER =

    1999

  49. [57]

    Bowen, Rufus , TITLE =. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 1972 , PAGES =. doi:10.2307/1995978 , URL =

    1972 doi

  50. [58]

    and Haefliger, Andr\'e , TITLE =

    Bridson, Martin R. and Haefliger, Andr\'e , TITLE =. 1999 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-12494-9 , URL =

    1999 doi

  51. [59]

    Recent advances in topological dynamics (

    Furstenberg, Harry , TITLE =. Recent advances in topological dynamics (. 1973 , MRCLASS =

    1973

  52. [60]

    Ergodic Theory Dynam

    Ballmann, Werner and Brin, Michael , TITLE =. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems , FJOURNAL =. 1982 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1017/s0143385700001632 , URL =

    1982 doi

  53. [61]

    Ballmann, Werner and Brin, Misha and Eberlein, Patrick , TITLE =. Ann. of Math. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 1985 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2307/1971373 , URL =

    1985 doi

  54. [62]

    Bowen, Rufus , TITLE =. Math. Systems Theory , FJOURNAL =. 1974/75 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF01762666 , URL =

    1974 doi

  55. [63]

    1995 , PAGES =

    Ballmann, Werner , TITLE =. 1995 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-9240-7 , URL =

    1995 doi

  56. [64]

    1995 , url =

    Ballmann, Werner , title =. 1995 , url =

    1995

  57. [65]

    1992 , PAGES =

    do Carmo, Manfredo Perdig\ ao , TITLE =. 1992 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2201-7 , URL =

    1992 doi

  58. [66]

    , TITLE =

    Munkres, James R. , TITLE =. 2000 , PAGES =

    2000

  59. [67]

    and Katok, A

    Hurder, S. and Katok, A. , TITLE =. Inst. Hautes \'Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1990 , PAGES =

    1990

  60. [68]

    1985 , PAGES =

    Ballmann, Werner and Gromov, Mikhael and Schroeder, Viktor , TITLE =. 1985 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-9159-3 , URL =

    1985 doi

  61. [69]

    Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , author=

    Thermostats without conjugate points , volume=. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , author=. 2026 , pages=. doi:10.1017/etds.2026.10285 , number=

    2026

  62. [70]

    Assenza, Valerio and De Simoi, Jacopo and Marshall Reber, James and Terek, Ivo , TITLE =. Adv. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2026 , PAGES =. doi:10.1016/j.aim.2026.111091 , URL =

    2026

  63. [71]

    , title =

    Guillarmou, Colin and Lefeuvre, Thibault and Paternain, Gabriel P. , title =. Duke Math. J. , volume =

  64. [72]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.18735 , year =

    Marshall Reber, James and Shen, Yumin , title =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.18735 , year =

    arXiv

  65. [73]

    Marshall Reber, James , title =. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  66. [74]

    Marshall Reber, James , title =. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.