Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 54 references

Wearable metasurfaces for boosting the effective area of mobile-device antennas

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A passive screen-printed clothing metasurface can collect millimeter-wave power over a large garment area and route it as surface waves to a nearby phone, boosting that device’s effective antenna area roughly tenfold.

desk verdict Solid passive textile demo of mmWave power routing to a garment edge; the UE-effective-area claim is still a free-space probe proxy, not a handset-on-body link result. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.24497 v1 pith:ORDQ7AJU submitted 2026-07-27 physics.optics

Mohammad M. Asgari , Xianghui Qiu , Francisco S. Cuesta , Shuai S. A. Yuan , Kamil A. Isik , Sergei Tretyakov , Xuchen Wang , Viktar Asadchy This is my paper
classification physics.optics
keywords wearablemetasurfaceeffectiveantennaareasurfacewavesscreen-printedtextilemillimeter-wavepassivepowerroutinguser-equipmentantennas26GHz
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

At millimeter-wave frequencies, compact phones are limited by their tiny antenna aperture as much as by path loss and blockage. This paper proposes a user-side fix: print a passive conductive metasurface on clothing so waves that would otherwise be absorbed by the body or scattered away are converted into guided surface waves and steered toward a pocket or cuff. The garment then acts as an auxiliary collecting aperture for whatever handset sits nearby, with no batteries, control chips, or wired link to the device. On a screen-printed hoodie textile at 26 GHz the authors measure about eightfold received-power enhancement near the designed edge; a lower-loss rigid board version reaches about twelve times. Reciprocity implies the same structure also helps the uplink. The practical stake is that everyday clothing could become a thin, flexible, mass-printable lens that brings unused body area into the wireless link budget.

What carries the argument

An aperiodic array of capacitively loaded conductive strips on a grounded textile, optimized with a Green-function impedance model and a power-flow figure of merit that maximizes useful surface-wave power delivered to an extended receiving region at the garment edge.

What would settle it

Mount a real 26 GHz handset antenna at the designed edge of the worn garment on a body phantom or volunteer under the same illumination and check whether the with/without-metasurface received-power ratio still approaches the reported free-space eightfold gain; collapse toward unity would falsify the wearable claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A passive, screen-printed textile metasurface can convert normally incident TE-polarized waves at 26 GHz into guided surface waves and route them to a designated garment edge, producing measured received-power enhancements of roughly eight times on textile and twelve times on a PCB control—thereby increasing the effective receiving and transmitting area of a nearby compact user-equipment antenna without active electronics, external power, or a wired connection.

Load-bearing premise

That free-space probe measurements on a flat sample still represent performance when the same pattern is curved on a lossy human body next to a real handset antenna.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Compact mmWave devices can collect useful power over garment-scale area instead of only their own roughly 1 cm² aperture.
  • The same passive textile improves uplink radiation by reciprocity without modifying the handset.
  • Industrial screen printing with conductive ink can manufacture large-area smart garments at ordinary textile scale.
  • Detachable vests or overlays can add the function to existing clothes without reprinting every garment.
  • Lower-loss fabrics and inks would raise the fraction of incident power delivered to the device edge.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Outdoor mobile use will need multi-angle and dual-polarization designs; the prototype is fixed to normal-incidence TE only.
  • Body curvature and tissue loading may shift surface-wave dispersion enough to require on-body re-optimization of the strip loads.
  • The same plane-wave-to-edge routing could be printed on tables, walls, or vehicle panels where wearability constraints disappear.
  • Closing the loop with pocket-aligned phone antennas, not just a free-space probe, is the next experiment that turns a near-field ratio into a link-budget number.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a passive textile metasurface that converts a normally incident 26-GHz TE plane wave into a guided surface wave and routes that power toward one garment edge, where a compact user-equipment antenna could be located. A loaded-strip Green-function model is used to optimize printed capacitive patterns on a finite grounded lossy substrate, with a Poynting-flux figure of merit and a power-balance decomposition into useful surface-wave, reflected, scattered, and absorbed channels. The authors fabricate a screen-printed silver-ink textile sample and measure an approximately 8x peak received-power enhancement near the intended edge, while a rigid lower-loss PCB control reaches about 12x. Opposite-edge and copper-plate controls support directional, engineered routing rather than generic edge scattering. The work is a credible physical proof of principle, but the measured field-probe proxy is not yet a demonstration of increased effective area or gain for a real mobile-device antenna, and the flat, solid-metal-backed, normal-incidence experiment leaves the central wearable use case insufficiently validated.

Significance. If validated at the terminal and worn-garment levels, the work would establish a distinctive third route to link-budget improvement: using passive clothing as an aperture-expansion layer for compact user equipment. The manuscript already has notable strengths: a finite-size Green-function design method that includes substrate and measured ink loss, a clear power-flow figure of merit, power-balance accounting, scalable screen-printed fabrication, washability testing, and several falsifiable controls—measurement at the wrong edge, an equal-area copper plate, and a lower-loss PCB implementation whose measured 12x peak closely matches the simulated 12.5x. These elements make the physical routing mechanism credible. The broader significance currently rests on device coupling and body-worn robustness that remain untested.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; Experimental validation; Fig. 4(b)] Abstract, Concept, and Experimental validation/Fig. 4(b): the central claim is increased effective area/gain of a mobile-device antenna, but the measured quantity is Pw/Pw/o for a 2-mm open-coax field probe in free space. Coupling of a real handset antenna to the bound surface-wave field, antenna loading and detuning of that mode, and the appropriate bare-antenna reference are not established; reciprocal transmit enhancement is likewise inferred rather than measured. Please either add a terminal-level link measurement with a representative compact antenna and matched bare-antenna reference, or narrow the title/abstract and conclusions to near-edge field/power concentration.
  2. [Concept; Experimental validation; Fig. 4(a)] The wearable configuration is not experimentally closed. Fig. 4 uses a flat, taut sample backed by a thin continuous metal layer at normal incidence; the mannequin is illustrative only, and the proposed practical printed-mesh garment ground plane is not fabricated or tested. Curvature, tissue proximity behind an imperfect flexible ground, and realistic incidence can alter guided-wave loss and edge delivery. Given the headline wearable claim, provide at least a curved/tissue-equivalent or on-body test and an implementation of the intended mesh ground, supported by sensitivity simulations, or explicitly present the work as a flat grounded-textile proof of principle.
  3. [Experimental validation; Methods: Experimental characterization] The illumination and measurement calibration require tighter support. The sample is stated to be 15 m from the horn in Experimental validation but 16 m in Methods; using Lx=197 mm and Ly=466 mm gives a Fraunhofer distance of roughly 44 m. At 16 m, the center-to-edge path difference along Ly is about 0.15 lambda (roughly 50 degrees of phase), so the plane-wave assumption is not self-evident. Lobby multipath, probe orientation/calibration, spatial averaging by the 0.17-lambda probe, and repeat uncertainty also directly affect the reported 8x/12x ratios. Please reconcile the geometry and report the illumination amplitude/phase, repeats/error bars, probe calibration, and, ideally, simulations using the measured incident wavefront.
  4. [Design and Figure of Merit, Eq. (3); Fig. 4] Eq. (3) and the Fig. 4 metric are not the same observable. The FOM is integrated y-directed Poynting flux through Region 1, normalized to incident power per unit x for a periodic-x model, whereas the experiment reports a pointwise finite-probe received-power ratio on a sample with finite Lx=17.1 lambda. The statement that the spatial trend agrees with Eq. (3), and the comparison to simulated 13x and 12.5x maxima, therefore need a clearer bridge. Specify whether the predictions use finite-Lx full-wave models and the experimental illumination/probe, or calculate the same local Pw/Pw/o observable from simulation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract's “approximately tenfold” result should identify the platform: the textile sample peaks at about 8x (9 dB), whereas 12x is for the rigid lower-loss PCB control.
  2. [Fig. 4] Improve the panel legends and captions so that scanning regions 1 and 2 are visually distinguishable in every panel; add uncertainty bars, the probe polarization, and the signed y/z coordinates of the scan paths.
  3. [Concept; Supplementary Section 1] The main text cites laundering robustness but defers all evidence to Supplementary Section 1. A brief table of wash cycles, post-wash sheet resistance, and any RF-performance change would make the practical claim easier to assess.
  4. [Experimental validation] Please report at least a measured frequency sweep and, if available, basic angular tolerance. This would clarify whether the demonstrated operation is strictly single-frequency/normal-incidence or has useful bandwidth for a communication link.
  5. [Code availability] “Code available from the corresponding author upon request” limits reproducibility. Deposit the optimization scripts, extracted material parameters, load profiles, and plotting data in a persistent repository where possible.
  6. [References; Abstract] References 18 and 22 appear to be the same smartphone-antenna paper; remove the duplicate. The first sentence of the Abstract also has an incomplete “either … ; on …” construction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: enhancement is an independent with/without measurement; design optimizes a stated Poynting FOM against measured material parameters.

full rationale

The paper’s load-bearing claim is experimental: received-power ratio Pw/Pw/o at a probe near the sample edge, with vs without the fabricated metasurface under fixed Tx geometry (Experimental validation; Fig. 4). That ratio is not obtained by fitting the claim into the metric, nor is it forced by a self-cited uniqueness theorem. Design-side, load reactances XL,n are optimized to maximize an explicitly defined power-flow FOM (Eq. 3)—the fraction of incident power through a finite collection region—using a Green-function/circuit model that incorporates measured ink resistivity (ρ = 0.0716 Ω·µm) and literature textile permittivity; the optimized pattern is then mapped to printable geometry and fabricated. Simulated field maps and power-balance channels (Psw, Pr, Psca, Pabs) are forward evaluations of that design, not renamings of fitted constants as predictions. Self-citations (e.g., Tretyakov analytical modeling; prior metasurface conversion literature) supply standard methods and background, not a circular chain that equates inputs with the reported enhancement. Gaps between free-space probe proxy and on-body UE-antenna gain are validity/scope issues, not circularity. Derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The claim rests on standard EM (reciprocity, Friis scaling with Ae), a thin-strip Green-function circuit model on a grounded lossy slab, chosen FOMs and geometry constraints, measured ink/fabric parameters, and the experimental premise that probe power ratios under quasi-plane illumination proxy wearable UE gain. No new particles or forces; invented content is the engineered aperiodic load distribution and the clothing-as-area-expander system concept.

free parameters (5)
  • Capacitive load reactances XL,n (per strip) = Constrained roughly −5e5 to −1.8e5 Ω/m; values in Supplementary §5
    Optimized by multi-population GA within a manufacturable capacitive range; mapped to arm lengths an. Central pattern degrees of freedom, not universal constants.
  • Strip/lattice geometry (w, d, b, s, h) = w=λ/43, d=λ/6, b=λ/5.5, s=λ/40, h≈2.2 mm
    Hand-chosen subwavelength design parameters (e.g. w=λ/43, d=λ/6, b=λ/5.5, h≈2.2 mm) that set the realizable impedance space.
  • FOM integration window (ys=Ly+λ, h1=λ) = h1=λ; ys=Ly+λ
    Defines “useful” power at the receiving edge; alternative FOMs in Supp. §4 change the optimum. Design target is metric-dependent.
  • Printed-ink bulk resistivity ρ and Rloss = ρ=0.0716 Ω·µm; Rloss≈8.5e3 Ω/m
    Measured for Metalon HPS-U57B and converted to series Rloss on each strip; directly limits lossy FOM.
  • Textile complex permittivity (εs, tanδs) = εs=1.81, tanδs=0.015
    Interpolated cotton–polyester model from literature, not re-measured on the final stack in the main text.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Maxwell/reciprocity and Friis: received power scales with user-side effective area Ae,rx under matched conditions.
    Introduction uses Friis to motivate area expansion; reciprocity equates Rx/Tx benefit.
  • domain assumption Narrow strips act as line currents with reff=w/4; mutual/self terms from numerical Green function of finite grounded substrate yield Z·I=Eext.
    Design section; valid when k0w≪1 and w≪d; underpins fast optimization without full-wave each trial.
  • domain assumption Locally periodic mapping from optimized XL,n to printable capacitive arm length an is accurate enough for the aperiodic array.
    Stated after optimization; standard but approximate for strongly aperiodic designs.
  • ad hoc to paper Operation restricted to 26 GHz, TE polarization, normal incidence, and 1D routing to a linear bottom edge.
    Explicit proof-of-concept simplifications in Concept section; required for the reported design and experiment.
  • domain assumption A continuous or mesh ground plane on the textile stack is acceptable for garment use and is present in the prototype.
    Structure is a grounded metasurface; practical mesh ground is proposed but prototype uses metallic backing.
  • domain assumption Lobby illumination at ~15–16 m is sufficiently plane-wave-like over the sample despite being inside the Fraunhofer distance.
    Methods acknowledge non-ideal plane wave; still treat field as approximately uniform for validation.
invented entities (2)
  • Wearable textile effective-area-expansion metasurface (clothing as passive virtual lens for UE) independent evidence
    purpose: Collect body-scale incident power, convert to surface waves, and deliver to pocket/cuff region without active hardware or device modification.
    System-level construct combining known conversion physics with garment integration and UE-centric FOM; validated only in free-space sample tests here.
  • Power-flow FOM = fraction of Pinc through near-edge Region 1
    purpose: Optimization target when exact antenna pose is unknown; steers design toward extended receiving zone.
    Paper-defined metric (Eq. 3); alternatives in supplement. Not a physical particle but an ad hoc design entity the optimum depends on.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Wearable metasurfaces for boosting the effective area of mobile-device antennas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ORDQ7AJU

@misc{pith2026260724497,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Wearable metasurfaces for boosting the effective area of mobile-device antennas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ORDQ7AJU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.24497}
}
read the original abstract

Wireless communications increasingly face scenarios with compact user equipments operating in propagation environments where signal blockage, absorption, and device size limitations strongly constrain link performance. Most approaches to wireless-link enhancement focus either on improving base-station antenna systems, for example, through massive MIMO architectures; on engineering the propagation environment using reconfigurable intelligent surfaces and active relays. Here, we propose an alternative user-side strategy for improving wireless links based on wearable metasurfaces that enhance the effective antenna area of compact wireless devices. The proposed passive metasurface is integrated into clothing and engineered to collect the power of electromagnetic waves incident on user's body and route the collected power toward a mobile device in the form of surface waves. This mechanism significantly increases the effective receiving and transmitting area of the device antenna and its gain without external power sources, active control electronics, or additional stand-alone hardware. We implement the concept on a hoodie textile using a scalable screen-printing process with conductive silver ink and demonstrate an approximately tenfold enhancement of the received signal at 26 GHz. This passive approach effectively brings the human body into the communication network by turning clothing into a virtual thin and flexible lens for focusing the incident power on the user equipment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.24497 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Three complementary strategies for im￾proving wireless links. The link budget can be enhanced by increasing the gain of the base-station-side antenna system, by engineering the propagation environment, or by improving the gain or effective area of the user-equipment-side antenna system. enhance the performance of user-equipment antennas without external power sources, active electronic control, or additional stand-a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Concept and textile fabrication workflow. a, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Design and numerical performance of the aperiodic textile metasurface. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Experimental validation of passive wireless-signal enhancement. a, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Rappaport, and Elza Erkip

    Sundeep Rangan, Theodore S. Rappaport, and Elza Erkip. Millimeter-wave cellular wireless networks: Potentials and challenges.Proceedings of the IEEE, 102(3):366–385, 2014. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2014. 2299397

    doi:10.1109/jproc.2014 2014

  2. [2]

    Rappaport, Yunchou Xing, Ojas Kan- here, Shihao Ju, Arjuna Madanayake, Soumyajit Mandal, Ahmed Alkhateeb, and Georgios C

    Theodore S. Rappaport, Yunchou Xing, Ojas Kan- here, Shihao Ju, Arjuna Madanayake, Soumyajit Mandal, Ahmed Alkhateeb, and Georgios C. Tri- chopoulos. Wireless communications and applica- tions above 100 GHz: Opportunities and challenges for 6G and beyond.IEEE Access, 7:78729–78757,

  3. [3]

    Rappaport, Shu Sun, Rimma Mayzus, Hang Zhao, Yaniv Azar, Kevin Wang, George N

    Theodore S. Rappaport, Shu Sun, Rimma Mayzus, Hang Zhao, Yaniv Azar, Kevin Wang, George N. Wong, Jocelyn K. Schulz, Mathew Samimi, and Felix Gutierrez. Millimeter wave mobile commu- nications for 5G cellular: It will work!IEEE Ac- cess, 1:335–349, 2013. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2013. 2260813

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2013 2013

  4. [4]

    A note on a simple transmission formula.proc

    Harald T Friis. A note on a simple transmission formula.proc. IRE, 34(5):254–256, 1946

    1946

  5. [5]

    Wireless communications through reconfig- urable intelligent surfaces.IEEE Access, 7:116753– 116773, 2019

    Ertugrul Basar, Marco Di Renzo, Julien de Rosny, Merouane Debbah, Mohamed-Slim Alouini, and Rui Zhang. Wireless communications through reconfig- urable intelligent surfaces.IEEE Access, 7:116753– 116773, 2019. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2935192

    arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Marco Di Renzo, Alessio Zappone, Merouane Deb- bah, Mohamed-Slim Alouini, Chau Yuen, Julien de Rosny, and Sergei Tretyakov. Smart radio envi- ronments empowered by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: How it works, state of research, and road ahead.IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Commu- nications, 38(11):2450–2525, November 2020. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2020.3007211

    arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Cuesta, Xuchen Wang, and Sergei A

    Sergei Kosulnikov, Francisco S. Cuesta, Xuchen Wang, and Sergei A. Tretyakov. Simple link-budget estimation formulas for channels including anoma- lous reflectors.IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 71(6):5276–5288, 2023. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2023. 3264982

    work page doi:10.1109/tap.2023 2023

  8. [8]

    An overview of signal processing techniques for millime- ter wave MIMO systems.IEEE journal of selected topics in signal processing, 10(3):436–453, 2016

    Robert W Heath, Nuria Gonzalez-Prelcic, Sundeep Rangan, Wonil Roh, and Akbar M Sayeed. An overview of signal processing techniques for millime- ter wave MIMO systems.IEEE journal of selected topics in signal processing, 10(3):436–453, 2016

    2016

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Jackson, Christophe Caloz, and Tatsuo Itoh

    David R. Jackson, Christophe Caloz, and Tatsuo Itoh. Leaky-wave antennas.Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(7):2194–2206, July 2012. doi: 10.1109/ JPROC.2012.2187410. 10

    2012

  2. [10]

    Leaky-wave antennas.Antenna engineering hand- book, 4:12, 2007

    Arthur A Oliner, David R Jackson, and JL Volakis. Leaky-wave antennas.Antenna engineering hand- book, 4:12, 2007

    2007

  3. [11]

    Alexandropoulos, M´ erouane Debbah, and Chau Yuen

    Chongwen Huang, Alessio Zappone, George C. Alexandropoulos, M´ erouane Debbah, and Chau Yuen. Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for energy efficiency in wireless communication.IEEE transac- tions on wireless communications, 18(8):4157–4170, 2019

    2019

  4. [12]

    Lars- son

    Emil Bj¨ ornson,¨Ozgecan ¨Ozdogan, and Erik G. Lars- son. Intelligent reflecting surface versus decode-and- forward: How large surfaces are needed to beat relaying?IEEE wireless communications letters, 9 (2):244–248, 2019

    2019

  5. [13]

    Marco Di Renzo, Alessio Zappone, Merouane Deb- bah, Mohamed-Slim Alouini, Chau Yuen, Julien De Rosny, and Sergei Tretyakov. Smart radio envi- ronments empowered by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: How it works, state of research, and the road ahead.IEEE journal on selected...

    2020

  6. [14]

    Carter, Leah Resneck, Younes Ra’di, and Nanfang Yu

    Michael J. Carter, Leah Resneck, Younes Ra’di, and Nanfang Yu. Flat-knit, flexible, textile metasurfaces. Advanced Materials, 36(32):2312087, 2024. doi: 10. 1002/adma.202312087

    2024

  7. [15]

    Asgari, Peter B

    Mohammad M. Asgari, Peter B. Catrysse, Haiwen Wang, Shanhui Fan, and Viktar Asadchy. Multifunc- tional passive metacrystals for enhancing wireless communications, 2024. arXiv:2412.05699

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    A self-controlled reconfigurable intel- ligent surface inspired by optical holography.Na- ture Electronics, 8:1108–1118, 2025

    Jieao Zhu, Ze Gu, Qian Ma, Linglong Dai, and Tie Jun Cui. A self-controlled reconfigurable intel- ligent surface inspired by optical holography.Na- ture Electronics, 8:1108–1118, 2025. doi: 10.1038/ s41928-025-01482-3

    2025

  9. [17]

    Adaptively programmable metasurface for intelligent wireless communications in complex environments.Nature Communications, 16:6070,

    Han Qing Yang, Jun Yan Dai, Hui Dong Li, Lijie Wu, Zi Hang Shen, Qun Yan Zhou, Meng Zhen Zhang, Si Ran Wang, Zheng Xing Wang, Jun Wei Wu, Shi Jin, Wankai Tang, Qiang Cheng, and Tie Jun Cui. Adaptively programmable metasurface for intelligent wireless communications in complex ...

  10. [19]

    5G millimeter-wave antenna array: Design and challenges.IEEE Wireless Com- munications, 24(2):106–112, 2017

    Jing Zhang, Xiaohu Ge, Qiang Li, Mohsen Guizani, and Yanxia Zhang. 5G millimeter-wave antenna array: Design and challenges.IEEE Wireless Com- munications, 24(2):106–112, 2017. doi: 10.1109/ MWC.2016.1400374RP

    2017

  11. [20]

    mmwave communi- cations for 5G: implementation challenges and ad- vances.Science China Information Sciences, 61(2): 021301, 2018

    Lianming Li, Dongming Wang, Xiaokang Niu, Yuan Chai, Linhui Chen, Long He, Xu Wu, Fuchun Zheng, Tiejun Cui, and Xiaohu You. mmwave communi- cations for 5G: implementation challenges and ad- vances.Science China Information Sciences, 61(2): 021301, 2018

    2018

  12. [21]

    Effect of antenna size on gain, bandwidth, and efficiency.Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards: Radio propaga- tion

    Roger F Harrington. Effect of antenna size on gain, bandwidth, and efficiency.Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards: Radio propaga- tion. D, 63, 1959

    1959

  13. [22]

    Millimeter-wave 5G antennas for smartphones: Overview and experimental demonstration.IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 65(12): 6250–6261, 2017

    Wonbin Hong, Kwang-Hyun Baek, and Seungtae Ko. Millimeter-wave 5G antennas for smartphones: Overview and experimental demonstration.IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 65(12): 6250–6261, 2017. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2017.2740963

    2017

  14. [23]

    Sen Yan, Ping Jack Soh, and Guy A. E. Vanden- bosch. Low-profile dual-band textile antenna with artificial magnetic conductor plane.IEEE Trans- actions on Antennas and Propagation, 62(12):6487– 6490, 2014. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2014.2359194

    2014

  15. [24]

    Adel Y. I. Ashyap, Zuhairiah Zainal Abidin, Sam- sul Haimi Dahlan, Hasliza A. Majid, Symeon M. Shah, Mohd R. Kamarudin, and Akram Alomainy. Compact and low-profile textile EBG-based antenna for wearable medical applications.IEEE Anten- nas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 16:...

  16. [25]

    Syrytsin, and Gert F

    Shuai Zhang, Xiaoming Chen, Igor A. Syrytsin, and Gert F. Pedersen. A planar switchable 3-D-coverage phased array antenna and its user effects for 28-GHz mobile terminal applications.IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 65(12):6413–6421,

  17. [26]

    Syrytsin, and Gert F

    Shuai Zhang, Igor A. Syrytsin, and Gert F. Pedersen. Compact beam-steerable antenna array with two passive parasitic elements for 5G mobile terminals at 28 GHz.IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 66(10):5193–5203, 2018. doi: 10.1109/ TAP.2018.2854167

    2018

  18. [27]

    Gradient-index meta-surfaces as a bridge linking propagating waves and surface waves

    Shulin Sun, Qiong He, Shiyi Xiao, Qin Xu, Xin Li, and Lei Zhou. Gradient-index meta-surfaces as a bridge linking propagating waves and surface waves. Nat. Mater., 11(5):426–431, Apr. 2012

    2012

  19. [28]

    Simultaneous controls of surface waves and propagating waves by metasurfaces.Appl

    Xiang Wan, Yun Bo Li, Ben Geng Cai, and Tie Jun Cui. Simultaneous controls of surface waves and propagating waves by metasurfaces.Appl. Phys. Lett., 105(12), Sep. 2014

    2014

  20. [29]

    doi: 10.1109/TAP.2017.2681463

    2017

  21. [30]

    Space-wave routing via surface waves using a metasurface sys- tem.Sci

    Karim Achouri and Christophe Caloz. Space-wave routing via surface waves using a metasurface sys- tem.Sci. Rep., 8(1):7549, May 2018. 11

    2018

  22. [31]

    Omega- bianisotropic metasurface for converting a prop- agating wave into a surface wave.Phys

    Vladislav Popov, Ana D ´ ıaz-Rubio, Viktar Asad- chy, Svetlana Tcvetkova, Fabrice Boust, Sergei Tretyakov, and Shah Nawaz Burokur. Omega- bianisotropic metasurface for converting a prop- agating wave into a surface wave.Phys. Rev. B, 100:125103, Sep. 2019

    2019

  23. [32]

    Modulated Reactance Surfaces for Leaky-Wave Radiation Based on Complete Aper- ture Field Synthesis.IEEE Transactions on Anten- nas and Propagation, 68(7):5463–5477, July 2020

    Do-Hoon Kwon. Modulated Reactance Surfaces for Leaky-Wave Radiation Based on Complete Aper- ture Field Synthesis.IEEE Transactions on Anten- nas and Propagation, 68(7):5463–5477, July 2020. ISSN 1558-2221. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2020.2977748

    2020

  24. [33]

    Tretyakov

    Do-Hoon Kwon and Sergei A. Tretyakov. Arbitrary beam control using passive lossless metasurfaces enabled by orthogonally polarized custom surface waves.Physical Review B, 97(3):035439, January

  25. [34]

    Ataloglou, Sean Victor Hum, and George V

    Gengyu Xu, Vasileios G. Ataloglou, Sean Victor Hum, and George V. Eleftheriades. Extreme beam- forming with impedance metasurfaces featuring em- bedded sources and auxiliary surface wave optimiza- tion.IEEE Access, 10:28670–28684, 2022. ISSN 2169-3536. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3157291

    2022

  26. [35]

    Direct synthesis of metasurfaces for efficient space- to surface-wave conversion and beamforming

    Talha Arshed, Stefano Maci, and Enrica Mar- tini. Direct synthesis of metasurfaces for efficient space- to surface-wave conversion and beamforming. IEEE Trans. Antennas Prop., 72(10):7793–7806, Oct. 2024

    2024

  27. [36]

    Near-perfect space-wave to surface- wave coupler enabled conformal space wave trans- porting metasurfaces.IEEE Trans

    Jordan Budhu. Near-perfect space-wave to surface- wave coupler enabled conformal space wave trans- porting metasurfaces.IEEE Trans. Antennas Prop., 72:2540–2054, Mar. 2024

  28. [37]

    Surface-wave metaprism for smart surface commu- nications.IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 73(9):6535–6545, September 2025

    Talha Arshed, Stefano Maci, and Enrica Martini. Surface-wave metaprism for smart surface commu- nications.IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 73(9):6535–6545, September 2025. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2025.3573607

    2025

  29. [38]

    Eleftheriades, and Sean Vic- tor Hum

    Gengyu Xu, George V. Eleftheriades, and Sean Vic- tor Hum. Wide-angle beam-steering and adaptive impedance matching with reconfigurable nonlocal leaky-wave antenna.IEEE Open Journal of An- tennas and Propagation, 3:1141–1153, 2022. ISSN 2637-6431. doi: 10.1109/OJAP.2022.3204927

    2022

  30. [39]

    Understanding leaky-wave structures: A special form of guided-wave structure

    Feng Xu and Ke Wu. Understanding leaky-wave structures: A special form of guided-wave structure. IEEE Microwave Magazine, 14(5):87–96, 2013. doi: 10.1109/MMM.2013.2259400

    2013

  31. [40]

    Amaya, and Jafar Shaker

    Nima Javanbakht, Barry Syrett, Rony E. Amaya, and Jafar Shaker. A review of reconfigurable leaky- wave antennas.IEEE Access, 9:94224–94238, 2021. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3093775

    2021

  32. [41]

    Printed meta- surface leaky wave antennas based on penetrable aperture field synthesis.IEEE Transactions on An- tennas and Propagation, 71(6):4724–4736, 2023

    Hakjune Lee and Do-Hoon Kwon. Printed meta- surface leaky wave antennas based on penetrable aperture field synthesis.IEEE Transactions on An- tennas and Propagation, 71(6):4724–4736, 2023. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2023.3262349

    2023

  33. [42]

    Near-perfect space-wave to surface- wave coupler enabled conformal space wave trans- porting metasurfaces.IEEE Transactions on An- tennas and Propagation, 72(3):2540–2554, 2024

    Jordan Budhu. Near-perfect space-wave to surface- wave coupler enabled conformal space wave trans- porting metasurfaces.IEEE Transactions on An- tennas and Propagation, 72(3):2540–2554, 2024. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2024.3352286

    2024

  34. [43]

    Tretyakov

    Yongming Li, Xikui Ma, Viktar Asadchy, and Sergei A. Tretyakov. Superdirective space-to-surface wave transformations with nonlocal metasurfaces. Physical Review Applied, 25(3):034095, March 2026. doi: 10.1103/fl1b-yq3y

    2026 doi

  35. [44]

    Textile materials for the design of wearable antennas: A survey.Sensors, 12(11):15841– 15857, November 2012

    Rita Salvado, Carolina Loss, Ricardo Gon¸ calves, and Pedro Pinho. Textile materials for the design of wearable antennas: A survey.Sensors, 12(11):15841– 15857, November 2012. doi: 10.3390/s121115841

    2012 doi

  36. [45]

    Wearable antennas: A review of materials, structures, and innovative features for autonomous communication and sensing.IEEE Access, 7:56694–56712, 2019

    Kashif Nisar Paracha, Sharul Kamal Abdul Rahim, Ping Jack Soh, and Mohsen Khalily. Wearable antennas: A review of materials, structures, and innovative features for autonomous communication and sensing.IEEE Access, 7:56694–56712, 2019. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2909146

    2019

  37. [46]

    Weddell, Hadi Khanbareh, Zacharias M

    Abiodun Komolafe, Bahareh Zaghari, Russel Torah, Alex S. Weddell, Hadi Khanbareh, Zacharias M. Tsikriteas, Mark Vousden, Mahmoud Wagih, Uriel Torres Jurado, Jiachen Shi, Siyang Yong, Sar- avanakumar Arumugam, Nick Harris, and Steve Beeby. E-textile technology review–from mater...

    2021

  38. [47]

    Tretyakov.Analytical Modeling in Applied Electromagnetics

    Sergei A. Tretyakov.Analytical Modeling in Applied Electromagnetics. Artech House, Norwood, MA, USA, 2003. ISBN 1580533671

    2003

  39. [48]

    Locher, M

    I. Locher, M. Klemm, T. Kirstein, and G. Troster. Design and characterization of purely textile patch antennas.IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packag- ing, 29(4):777–788, November 2006. doi: 10.1109/ TADVP.2006.884780

    2006

  40. [49]

    Chappell

    Yuehui Ouyang and William J. Chappell. High frequency properties of electro-textiles for wear- able antenna applications.IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 56(2):381–389, 2008. doi: 10.1109/TAP. 2007.915435. 12

    2008

  41. [53]

    Conformal sparse metasurfaces for wavefront manipulation.Phys

    Vladislav Popov, Shah Nawaz Burokur, and Fabrice Boust. Conformal sparse metasurfaces for wavefront manipulation.Phys. Rev. Appl., 14:044007, Oct

  42. [2017]

    doi: 10.1109/LA WP.2017.2732355

    2017

  43. [2018]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.035439

    doi

  44. [2019]

    doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2921522

    2019

  45. [2020]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.044007

    doi

  46. [2025]

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61409-6

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.