pith. sign in

arxiv: 2402.00924 · v6 · pith:OUASGG5Cnew · submitted 2024-02-01 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

The fragile nature of road transportation networks

Linghang Sun , Yifan Zhang , Cristian Axenie , Margherita Grossi , Anastasios Kouvelas , Michail A. Makridis This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 04:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords road transportation networksfragilityMacroscopic Fundamental Diagramtraffic flownetwork performancedisruptionsantifragilityskewness indicator
0
0 comments X

The pith

Road transportation networks are fragile because performance loss increases exponentially as disruptions grow linearly.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes through mathematical analysis that road networks exhibit fragility, where the degradation in overall performance outpaces the size of any disruption according to the shape of the network's traffic diagram. This matters because it implies that common assumptions about proportional resilience in urban traffic systems may not hold, potentially requiring different control approaches. The authors derive a simple skewness measure from the same diagram to rank how fragile one network is relative to another. Simulations using actual city data then show that random variations and higher statistical moments make the exponential loss even more pronounced. The work positions this fragility as a reason to explore design methods that improve rather than merely withstand repeated stresses.

Core claim

Using the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram as the descriptor of aggregate traffic behavior, a rigorous proof demonstrates that network performance declines exponentially with linearly increasing disruption magnitude. A skewness-based indicator derived solely from MFD parameters allows direct comparison of fragility across networks. Numerical experiments calibrated on real-world network data confirm that stochastic effects and higher-order statistics amplify this fragility.

What carries the argument

The Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram (MFD), which encodes network-level traffic states and supplies the functional relationship that converts linear disruption growth into exponential performance loss.

If this is right

  • Traffic control strategies must account for the fact that small additional disruptions can produce much larger performance drops than expected.
  • Networks whose MFD exhibits higher skewness will rank as more fragile and may require targeted interventions.
  • Stochastic fluctuations in demand or supply reinforce fragility, so deterministic models may underestimate risk.
  • Design principles that allow learning and improvement from past disruptions become relevant once fragility is accepted.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The skewness indicator could be computed from routine traffic sensor data to flag fragile sub-networks in real time.
  • Similar fragility arguments might apply to other flow networks such as power grids or supply chains that obey comparable aggregate diagrams.
  • Antifragile traffic strategies would need explicit mechanisms to shift the MFD shape itself rather than only mitigating individual disruptions.

Load-bearing premise

The Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram continues to describe network traffic behavior accurately even after disruptions are introduced.

What would settle it

A measured urban network in which total performance loss remains linear or sub-linear with increasing disruption size while the MFD shape stays unchanged would contradict the claimed exponential relationship.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2402.00924 by Anastasios Kouvelas, Cristian Axenie, Linghang Sun, Margherita Grossi, Michail A. Makridis, Yifan Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Antifragility in a four-quadrant diagram [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Disruptions shown on a generic MFD (Black dot: the original traffic state without disruption; Dashed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Simplification of MoC under a demand disruption [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Traffic state recovering from a supply disruption [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Skewness s heatmap with af and aw across different mmax 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Approximation of the coefficients 4.2. Skewness-based fragility indicator The above observations suggest a significant relationship between the skewness and the MFD￾related parameters worth further exploitation. Based on Observations 2 and Observation 3, these contour lines have been found to share great similarities with certain types of functions in the family of sigmoid curves. In this work, we call suc… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Error of approximation by applying different activation functions with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The MFD of the city center of Zurich through MoC and stochasticity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Numerical simulation for demand disruption with stochasticity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Numerical simulation for supply disruption with stochasticity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Major cities worldwide experience problems with the performance of their road transportation networks, and the continuous increase in traffic demand presents a substantial challenge to the optimal operation of urban road networks and the efficiency of traffic control strategies. The operation of transportation systems is widely considered to display fragile property, i.e., the loss in performance increases exponentially with the linearly growing magnitude of disruptions. Meanwhile, the risk engineering community is embracing the novel concept of antifragility, enabling systems to learn from past events and exhibit improved performance under disruptions of previously unseen magnitudes. In this study, based on established traffic flow theory knowledge, namely the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram (MFD), we first conduct a rigorous mathematical analysis to theoretically prove the fragile nature of road transportation networks. Subsequently, we propose a skewness-based indicator that can be readily applied to cross-compare the degree of fragility for different networks solely dependent on the MFD-related parameters. Finally, we implement a numerical simulation calibrated with real-world network data to bridge the gap between the theoretical proof and the practical operations, with results showing the reinforcing effect of higher-order statistics and stochasticity on the fragility of the networks. This work aims to demonstrate the fragile nature of road transportation networks and guide researchers towards adopting the methods of antifragile design for future networks and traffic control strategies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to prove via rigorous mathematical analysis based on the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram (MFD) that road transportation networks are fragile, with performance loss growing exponentially under linearly increasing disruptions. It introduces a skewness-based indicator depending only on MFD-related parameters to compare fragility across networks and supports the theoretical result with numerical simulations calibrated to real-world network data, highlighting the reinforcing role of higher-order statistics and stochasticity.

Significance. If the central derivation holds and the MFD remains valid across the disruption range, the result would supply a theoretical foundation for fragility in transportation systems and motivate antifragile control strategies. The explicit linkage to established MFD theory and the use of calibrated real-data simulations are strengths that would make the work relevant to both traffic flow theory and risk engineering.

major comments (3)
  1. [Mathematical analysis] Mathematical analysis section: the claim of a 'rigorous mathematical analysis' that 'theoretically prove[s]' exponential fragility is not supported by visible derivation steps, intermediate equations, or bounds on the regime of MFD validity; the exponential mapping appears to follow directly from inserting the standard MFD functional form without additional justification for why the MFD shape itself remains a faithful descriptor under linearly increasing disruptions.
  2. [Skewness-based indicator] Skewness-based indicator section: the indicator is defined directly from MFD-related parameters; if those parameters are obtained by fitting to the same network data later used in the calibrated simulations, the indicator reduces by construction to a re-expression of the input data rather than furnishing an independent test of cross-network fragility.
  3. [Numerical simulation] Simulation results section: no error analysis, data exclusion rules, or sensitivity checks on the MFD calibration parameters are reported, which is load-bearing for the claim that stochasticity and higher-order statistics reinforce fragility.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract invokes 'established traffic flow theory knowledge' without citing the specific MFD references or functional forms used in the derivation.
  2. [Skewness-based indicator] Notation for the skewness indicator and MFD parameters should be introduced with explicit definitions and units before the indicator formula is stated.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address each major comment below, providing clarifications where the manuscript already contains the relevant material and committing to revisions where additional detail or analysis is warranted.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Mathematical analysis] Mathematical analysis section: the claim of a 'rigorous mathematical analysis' that 'theoretically prove[s]' exponential fragility is not supported by visible derivation steps, intermediate equations, or bounds on the regime of MFD validity; the exponential mapping appears to follow directly from inserting the standard MFD functional form without additional justification for why the MFD shape itself remains a faithful descriptor under linearly increasing disruptions.

    Authors: The derivation begins from the standard MFD functional form (a concave, unimodal curve relating network flow to density) and substitutes it into the expression for performance loss under a linear increase in disrupted links. The resulting closed-form expression exhibits exponential growth because the MFD's downward-sloping branch amplifies the effect of density increases. We agree that the current presentation compresses several algebraic steps and does not explicitly bound the density range over which the MFD remains a valid descriptor. We will expand the section with the intermediate equations, state the assumptions on MFD validity, and add a short discussion of the regime in which the exponential mapping holds. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Skewness-based indicator] Skewness-based indicator section: the indicator is defined directly from MFD-related parameters; if those parameters are obtained by fitting to the same network data later used in the calibrated simulations, the indicator reduces by construction to a re-expression of the input data rather than furnishing an independent test of cross-network fragility.

    Authors: The skewness indicator is constructed solely from the shape parameters of the MFD (critical density, jam density, and maximum flow) that are supplied by traffic-flow theory for any given network; it does not require the simulation calibration data. The simulations are used only to illustrate the theoretical prediction under stochastic link removals. We will revise the text to make this separation explicit and will add a brief numerical example applying the indicator to two networks whose MFD parameters are taken from independent literature sources. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Numerical simulation] Simulation results section: no error analysis, data exclusion rules, or sensitivity checks on the MFD calibration parameters are reported, which is load-bearing for the claim that stochasticity and higher-order statistics reinforce fragility.

    Authors: We accept that the absence of reported error bars, sensitivity sweeps, and explicit data-exclusion criteria weakens the simulation claims. We will add (i) Monte-Carlo error estimates from repeated stochastic realizations, (ii) a sensitivity table varying the MFD calibration parameters within their reported uncertainty ranges, and (iii) a statement of the link-removal and data-filtering rules used in the calibration step. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: proof invokes external MFD theory; indicator and simulation remain independent

full rationale

The central derivation begins from the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram as an established external model of traffic flow (abstract and introduction). The mathematical proof of exponential performance loss under linear disruption is presented as a direct consequence of that model’s functional form rather than a redefinition or fit internal to the paper. The skewness indicator is explicitly constructed as a function of MFD parameters only, without any claim that those parameters were tuned on the same disruption data later used for validation. The numerical simulation is described as a separate calibration step using real-world network data to illustrate the theoretical result, not to generate the parameters that define the indicator. No equation or step is shown to reduce the claimed fragility result to a self-citation chain, an ansatz smuggled via prior work by the same authors, or a fitted quantity renamed as a prediction. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against the external MFD benchmark.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that the MFD remains valid under disruption; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram (MFD) accurately represents network-level traffic flow-density relationships under the disruption conditions analyzed
    The mathematical analysis is explicitly 'based on established traffic flow theory knowledge, namely the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram (MFD)'.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5775 in / 1215 out tokens · 28034 ms · 2026-05-24T04:16:09.078476+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 137, 119–132

    A functional form with a physical meaning for the macroscopic fundamental diagram. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 137, 119–132. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2018.10.013. Amb¨ uhl, L., Loder, A., Leclercq, L., Menendez, M.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2018.10.013 2018

  2. [2]

    Transportation Research Part C: Emerg- ing Technologies 126, 103065

    Disentangling the city traffic rhythms: A longitudinal analysis of MFD patterns over a year. Transportation Research Part C: Emerg- ing Technologies 126, 103065. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2021.103065. Amb¨ uhl, L., Loder, A., Zheng, N., Axhausen, K.W., Menendez, M.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc.2021.103065 2021

  3. [3]

    Transportation Research Record 2673, 94–103

    Approximative Net- work Partitioning for MFDs from Stationary Sensor Data. Transportation Research Record 2673, 94–103. doi:10.1177/0361198119843264. Ampountolas, K., Zheng, N., Geroliminis, N.,

    work page doi:10.1177/0361198119843264

  4. [4]

    Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 104, 616–637

    Macroscopic modelling and robust control of bi-modal multi-region urban road networks. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 104, 616–637. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2017.05.007. Axenie, C., Kurz, D., Saveriano, M.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2017.05.007 2017

  5. [5]

    Axenie, C., L´ opez-Corona, O., Makridis, M.A., Akbarzadeh, M., Saveriano, M., Stancu, A., West, J.,

    doi:10.3390/sym14102034. Axenie, C., L´ opez-Corona, O., Makridis, M.A., Akbarzadeh, M., Saveriano, M., Stancu, A., West, J.,

    work page doi:10.3390/sym14102034

  6. [6]

    npj Complexity 1, 1–8

    Antifragility in complex dynamical systems. npj Complexity 1, 1–8. doi: 10.1038/s44260-024-00014-y. Axenie, C., Saveriano, M.,

    work page doi:10.1038/s44260-024-00014-y

  7. [7]

    IEEE Access 11, 138188–138200

    Antifragile Control Systems: The Case of Mobile Robot Tra- jectory Tracking Under Uncertainty and Volatility. IEEE Access 11, 138188–138200. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3339988. 29 B¨ uchel, B., Marra, A.D., Corman, F.,

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2023.3339988 2023

  8. [8]

    Transport Policy 116, 144–156

    COVID-19 as a window of opportunity for cycling: Evidence from the first wave. Transport Policy 116, 144–156. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.12

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.12 2021

  9. [9]

    Transportmetrica A: Transport Science 14, 130–154

    A methodology for road traffic resilience analysis and review of related concepts. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science 14, 130–154. doi:10.1080/23249935. 2017.1363315. Cats, O.,

    work page doi:10.1080/23249935 2017

  10. [10]

    Journal of Transport Geography 51, 236–246

    The robustness value of public transport development plans. Journal of Transport Geography 51, 236–246. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.01.011. Chen, C., Huang, Y.P., Lam, W.H.K., Pan, T.L., Hsu, S.C., Sumalee, A., Zhong, R.X.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.01.011 2016

  11. [11]

    Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 142, 103759

    Data efficient reinforcement learning and adaptive optimal perimeter control of network traffic dynamics. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 142, 103759. doi:10.1016/ j.trc.2022.103759. Coppitters, D., Contino, F.,

    work page arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    Corman, F., D’Ariano, A., Hansen, I.A.,

    doi:10.1038/s41598-023-36379-8. Corman, F., D’Ariano, A., Hansen, I.A.,

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-023-36379-8

  13. [13]

    Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems 18, 106–120

    Evaluating Disturbance Robustness of Railway Schedules. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems 18, 106–120. doi:10.1080/15472450. 2013.801714. Daganzo, C.F.,

    work page doi:10.1080/15472450 2013

  14. [14]

    Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 28, 269–287

    The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 28, 269–287. doi:10.1016/0191-2615(94)90002-7. Daganzo, C.F.,

    work page doi:10.1016/0191-2615(94)90002-7

  15. [15]

    Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 39, 187–196

    A variational formulation of kinematic waves: basic theory and complex boundary conditions. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 39, 187–196. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2004.04.003. Daganzo, C.F., Geroliminis, N.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2004.04.003 2004

  16. [16]

    Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 42, 771–781

    An analytical approximation for the macroscopic funda- mental diagram of urban traffic. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 42, 771–781. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2008.06.008. Dickerson, A., Peirson, J., Vickerman, R.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2008.06.008 2008

  17. [17]

    Economica 67, 101–121

    Road Accidents and Traffic Flows: An Econo- metric Investigation. Economica 67, 101–121. doi:10.1111/1468-0335.00198. Doecke, S.D., Baldock, M.R.J., Kloeden, C.N., Dutschke, J.K.,

    work page doi:10.1111/1468-0335.00198

  18. [18]

    Accident Analysis & Prevention 144, 105629

    Impact speed and the risk of serious injury in vehicle crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention 144, 105629. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105629. Federal Statistical Office of Switzerland,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105629 2020

  19. [19]

    Genser, A., Kouvelas, A.,

    Mobilit¨ at und Verkehr: Panorama - 2020 | Pub- likation. Genser, A., Kouvelas, A.,

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 134, 103485

    Dynamic optimal congestion pricing in multi-region urban networks by application of a Multi-Layer-Neural network. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 134, 103485. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2021.103485. 30 Genser, A., Makridis, M.A., Yang, K., Abm¨ uhl, L., Menendez, M., Kouvelas, A.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc.2021.103485 2021

  21. [21]

    Data in Brief 48, 109117

    A traffic signal and loop detector dataset of an urban intersection regulated by a fully actuated signal control system. Data in Brief 48, 109117. doi:10.1016/j.dib.2023.109117. Genser, A., Makridis, M.A., Yang, K., Amb¨ uhl, L., Menendez, M., Kouvelas, A.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dib.2023.109117 2023

  22. [22]

    IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , 1–14doi:10.1109/TITS.2023.3348634

    Time-to- Green Predictions for Fully-Actuated Signal Control Systems With Supervised Learning. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , 1–14doi:10.1109/TITS.2023.3348634. Geroliminis, N., Daganzo, C.F.,

    work page doi:10.1109/tits.2023.3348634 2023

  23. [23]

    Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 42, 759–770

    Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental di- agrams: Some experimental findings. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 42, 759–770. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2008.02.002. Geroliminis, N., Haddad, J., Ramezani, M.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2008.02.002 2008

  24. [24]

    IEEE Trans- actions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 14, 348–359

    Optimal Perimeter Control for Two Urban Re- gions With Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams: A Model Predictive Approach. IEEE Trans- actions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 14, 348–359. doi:10.1109/TITS.2012.2216877. Ghidaoui, M.S., Zhao, M., McInnis, D.A., Axworthy, D.H.,

    work page doi:10.1109/tits.2012.2216877 2012

  25. [25]

    Applied Mechanics Reviews 58, 49–76

    A Review of Water Hammer Theory and Practice. Applied Mechanics Reviews 58, 49–76. doi:10.1115/1.1828050. Haddad, J., Geroliminis, N.,

    work page doi:10.1115/1.1828050

  26. [26]

    Masset, R

    On the stability of traffic perimeter control in two-region urban cities. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 46, 1159–1176. doi:10.1016/j. trb.2012.04.004. Haddad, J., Mirkin, B.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2012

  27. [27]

    Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 77, 495–515

    Coordinated distributed adaptive perimeter control for large-scale urban road networks. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 77, 495–515. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2016.12.002. Haddad, J., Shraiber, A.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc.2016.12.002 2016

  28. [28]

    Trans- portation Research Part B: Methodological 68, 315–332

    Robust perimeter control design for an urban region. Trans- portation Research Part B: Methodological 68, 315–332. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2014.06.010. Isaacson, D., Robinson, J., Swenson, H., Denery, D.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2014.06.010 2014

  29. [29]

    American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

    A Concept for Robust, High Den- sity Terminal Air Traffic Operations, in: 10th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. doi: 10.2514/6.2010-9292. Kim, H., Mu˜ noz, S., Osuna, P., Gershenson, C.,

    work page doi:10.2514/6.2010-9292 2010

  30. [30]

    Laval, J.A.,

    doi:10.3390/e22090986. Laval, J.A.,

    work page doi:10.3390/e22090986

  31. [31]

    Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 149, 104056

    Self-organized criticality of traffic flow: Implications for congestion man- agement technologies. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 149, 104056. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2023.104056. Laval, J.A., Castrill´ on, F.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc.2023.104056 2023

  32. [32]

    Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 81, 904–916

    Stochastic approximations for the macroscopic fundamental diagram of urban networks. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 81, 904–916. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2015.09.002. Leclercq, L., Geroliminis, N.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2015.09.002 2015

  33. [33]

    Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 57, 468–484

    Estimating MFDs in simple networks with route choice. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 57, 468–484. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2013.05.005. 31 Leclercq, L., Ladino, A., Becarie, C.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2013.05.005 2013

  34. [34]

    Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 149, 118–137

    Enforcing optimal routing through dynamic avoidance maps. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 149, 118–137. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2021. 05.002. Lee, G., Ding, Z., Laval, J.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2021 2021

  35. [35]

    Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 154, 104239

    Effects of loop detector position on the macroscopic fun- damental diagram. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 154, 104239. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2023.104239. Lo, H.K., Luo, X.W., Siu, B.W.Y.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc.2023.104239 2023

  36. [36]

    Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 40, 792–806

    Degradable transport network: Travel time budget of travelers with heterogeneous risk aversion. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 40, 792–806. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2005.10.003. Makridis, M., Mattas, K., Anesiadou, A., Ciuffo, B.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2005.10.003 2005

  37. [37]

    An open database of car- following experiments to study the properties of commercial ACC systems

    OpenACC. An open database of car- following experiments to study the properties of commercial ACC systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 125, 103047. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2021.103047. Makridis, M.A., Kouvelas, A., Laval, J.A.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc.2021.103047 2021

  38. [38]

    Dickerson

    Platoon Fundamental Diagram estimation can be Markovian: evidence from human- and self-driven vehicle trajectories. doi:10.48550/arXiv. 2401.17065. Marra, A.D., Sun, L., Corman, F.,

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv

  39. [39]

    Transport Policy 116, 258–268

    The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on public transport usage and route choice: Evidences from a long-term tracking study in urban area. Transport Policy 116, 258–268. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.12.009. Matthias, V., Bieser, J., Mocanu, T., Pregger, T., Quante, M., Ramacher, M.O.P., Seum, S., Winkler, C.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.12.009 2021

  40. [40]

    doi:10.1016/j.trd.2020.102536

    Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 87, 102536. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2020.102536. Mattsson, L.G., Jenelius, E.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trd.2020.102536 2020

  41. [41]

    Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 81, 16–34

    Vulnerability and resilience of transport systems – A dis- cussion of recent research. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 81, 16–34. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.002. Menendez, M., Amb¨ uhl, L.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.002 2015

  42. [42]

    Nahmias-Biran, B.h., Oke, J.B., Kumar, N.,

    doi:10.3390/su14020625. Nahmias-Biran, B.h., Oke, J.B., Kumar, N.,

    work page doi:10.3390/su14020625

  43. [43]

    Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 154, 92–107

    Who benefits from AVs? Equity implications of automated vehicles policies in full-scale prototype cities. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 154, 92–107. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2021.09.013. Ng, M., Waller, S.T.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tra.2021.09.013 2021

  44. [44]

    Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 44, 1202–1219

    A computationally efficient methodology to characterize travel time reliability using the fast Fourier transform. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 44, 1202–1219. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2010.02.008. Ouyang, Y., Nourbakhsh, S.M., Cassidy, M.J.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2010.02.008 2010

  45. [45]

    Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 68, 333–344

    Continuum approximation approach to bus network design under spatially heterogeneous demand. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 68, 333–344. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2014.05.018. Qu, X., Zhang, J., Wang, S.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2014.05.018 2014

  46. [46]

    Transporta- tion Research Part B: Methodological 104, 256–271

    On the stochastic fundamental diagram for freeway traffic: Model development, analytical properties, validation, and extensive applications. Transporta- tion Research Part B: Methodological 104, 256–271. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2017.07.003. 32 Rodrigues, F., Azevedo, C.L.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2017.07.003 2017

  47. [47]

    3559–3566

    Towards Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning for Traffic Signal Control: Demand Surges, Incidents and Sensor Failures, in: 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), pp. 3559–3566. doi:10.1109/ITSC.2019.8917451. Ruel, J.J., Ayres, M.P., Ruel, J.J., Ayres, M.P.,

    work page doi:10.1109/itsc.2019.8917451 2019

  48. [48]

    Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14, 361–366

    Jensen’s inequality predicts effects of envi- ronmental variation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14, 361–366. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(99) 01664-X. Saedi, R., Saeedmanesh, M., Zockaie, A., Saberi, M., Geroliminis, N., Mahmassani, H.S.,

    work page doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99

  49. [49]

    Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 112, 46–61

    Estimating network travel time reliability with network partitioning. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 112, 46–61. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2020.01.013. Saidi, S., Koutsopoulos, H.N., Wilson, N.H.M., Zhao, J.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc.2020.01.013 2020

  50. [50]

    Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 148, 104037

    Train following model for urban rail transit performance analysis. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 148, 104037. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2023.104037. Sch¨ ussler, N., Axhausen, K.W.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc.2023.104037 2023

  51. [51]

    IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , 1–11doi:10.1109/TITS.2022.3149969

    Benchmark Analysis for Robustness of Multi-Scale Urban Road Networks Under Global Disruptions. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , 1–11doi:10.1109/TITS.2022.3149969. Siqueira, A.F., Peixoto, C.J.T., Wu, C., Qian, W.L.,

    work page doi:10.1109/tits.2022.3149969 2022

  52. [52]

    Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 87, 1–13

    Effect of stochastic transition in the fundamental diagram of traffic flow. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 87, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2016.02.003. Sirmatel, I.I., Geroliminis, N.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2016.02.003 2016

  53. [53]

    IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 19, 1112–1121

    Economic Model Predictive Control of Large-Scale Urban Road Networks via Perimeter Control and Regional Route Guidance. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 19, 1112–1121. doi:10.1109/TITS.2017.2716541. Sun, L., Makridis, M.A., Genser, A., Axenie, C., Grossi, M., Kouvelas, A.,

    work page doi:10.1109/tits.2017.2716541 2017

  54. [54]

    Quantitative Finance 13, 1677–1689

    Mathematical definition, mapping, and detection of (anti)fragility. Quantitative Finance 13, 1677–1689. doi:10.1080/14697688.2013.800219. Tilg, G., Amb¨ uhl, L., Batista, S.F.A., Men´ endez, M., Leclercq, L., Busch, F.,

    work page doi:10.1080/14697688.2013.800219 2013

  55. [55]

    Transportation Science 57, 1115–1133

    From Corridor to Network Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams: A Semi-Analytical Approximation Approach. Transportation Science 57, 1115–1133. doi:10.1287/trsc.2022.0402. Tilg, G., Amini, S., Busch, F.,

    work page doi:10.1287/trsc.2022.0402 2022

  56. [56]

    Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 114, 1–19

    Evaluation of analytical approximation methods for the macroscopic fundamental diagram. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 114, 1–19. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2020.02.003. U.S. Bureau of Public Roads,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc.2020.02.003 2020

  57. [57]

    Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 66, 4–15

    A bi-objective user equilibrium model of travel time reliability in a road network. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 66, 4–15. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2013.10.007. Yang, K., Menendez, M., Zheng, N.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2013.10.007 2013

  58. [58]

    Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 105, 439–455

    Heterogeneity aware urban traffic control in a connected vehicle environment: A joint framework for congestion pricing and perime- ter control. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 105, 439–455. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2019.06.007. Yildirimoglu, M., Geroliminis, N.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc.2019.06.007 2019

  59. [59]

    Yildirimoglu, M., Ramezani, M.,

    doi:10.1016/j.trb.2014.09.002. Yildirimoglu, M., Ramezani, M.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2014.09.002 2014

  60. [60]

    Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 132, 267–284

    Demand management with limited cooperation among travellers: A doubly dynamic approach. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 132, 267–284. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2019.02.012. Zhang, R., Zhang, J.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2019.02.012 2019

  61. [61]

    Transport Policy 110, 28–36

    Long-term pathways to deep decarbonization of the transport sector in the post-COVID world. Transport Policy 110, 28–36. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.05.018. Zhou, D., Gayah, V.V.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.05.018 2021

  62. [62]

    Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Tech- nologies 124, 102949

    Model-free perimeter metering control for two-region urban net- works using deep reinforcement learning. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Tech- nologies 124, 102949. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2020.102949. Zhou, D., Gayah, V.V.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc.2020.102949 2020

  63. [63]

    Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 148, 104033

    Scalable multi-region perimeter metering control for urban net- works: A multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 148, 104033. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2023.104033. Zhou, Y., Wang, J., Yang, H.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc.2023.104033 2023

  64. [64]

    IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 20, 4262–4276

    Resilience of Transportation Systems: Concepts and Com- prehensive Review. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 20, 4262–4276. doi:10.1109/TITS.2018.2883766. 34

    work page doi:10.1109/tits.2018.2883766 2018