Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Interference of Resonance Fluorescence from two four-level atoms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv physics/9611028 v1 pith:OWYFWX7H submitted 1996-11-28 physics.atom-ph

classification physics.atom-ph
keywords interferenceatomsatomiccarryexperimentfluorescencefour-levellaser
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In a recent experiment by Eichmann et al., polarization-sensitive measurements of the fluorescence from two four-level ions driven by a linearly polarized laser were made. Depending on the polarization chosen, different degrees of interference were observed. We carry out a theoretical and numerical study of this system, showing that the results can largely be understood by treating the atoms as independent radiators which are synchronized by the phase of the incident laser field. The interference and its loss may be described in terms of the difference between coherent and incoherent driving of the various atomic transitions in the steady-state. In the numerical simulations, which are carried out using the Monte Carlo wave function method, we remove the assumption that the atoms radiate independently and consider the photodetection process in detail. This allows us to see the total interference pattern build up from individual photodetections and also to see the effects of superfluorescence, which become important when the atomic separation is comparable to an optical wavelength. The results of the calculations are compared with the experiment. We also carry out simulations in the non steady-state regime and discuss the relationship between the visibility of the interference pattern and which-path considerations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools