Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 32 references

Effect of optimal uncoupling in enhancing synchronization stability in coupled chaotic systems

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Rotating the uncoupling window away from the coordinate axes broadens and deepens the stable synchronization region in coupled Rössler and Chua systems.

desk verdict The paper's 'optimal uncoupling direction' is actually an aspect-ratio scan of an axis-aligned rectangle, which undermines the central claim, but the underlying stability observation may survive re-interpretation. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09490 v3 pith:P2E2FQBK submitted 2019-08-26 nlin.CD

G. Sivaganesh , B. D. Sharmila , A. Arulgnanam This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.CD MSC 37D4534C28 PACS 05.45.Xt05.45.-a
keywords coupledoscillatorssynchronizationoptimaluncouplingtransientmasterstabilityfunctionRösslersystemChuacircuitclippingfraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish that the orientation of a temporary uncoupling window in the response system's phase space can be used as a control parameter for synchronization stability in coupled chaotic systems. For unidirectionally coupled Rössler systems, orienting the clipping window between roughly $0.1667\pi$ and $0.3444\pi$ (and the mirror range $0.6556\pi$ to $0.8333\pi$) yields stable synchronization with more negative master stability function values than axis-aligned coupling; the same pattern appears for Chua's circuit. The paper also shows that the effectiveness curve is symmetric about $\theta=\pi/2$, so only the first quadrant of orientations needs to be searched. If correct, the result gives an experimentally simple knob—the tilt of the on-off coupling window—for stabilizing synchronized chaos.

What carries the argument

The central object is the oriented clipping window: a box in the response system's phase space, centered on the attractor and rotated by angle $\theta$ from a coordinate axis, with components $\Delta_x=\Delta\cos\theta$ and $\Delta_y=\Delta\sin\theta$. Coupling is active only while the response trajectory lies in that box ($\chi_A=1$), and inactive outside it. Stability is diagnosed with the master stability function $\lambda^\perp_{\max}$ and with the effectiveness $S(\theta)=\int_0^1 s(f,\theta)\,df$, where $s=1$ when $\lambda^\perp_{\max}<0$. Sweeping $\theta$ and the spatial clipping fraction $\Delta'=2\Delta/\Omega$ produces the reported optimal ranges.

What would settle it

Directly simulate the coupled Rössler equations with the switching term $\chi_A$ evaluated from the actual orbit's position in the oriented box, compute $\lambda^\perp_{\max}$ as a function of $\theta$ for $\varepsilon=10$, and compare the resulting $S(\theta)$ with the paper's spatial-scan $S(\theta)$; if the optimal windows shift, shrink, or disappear under the true temporal clipping fraction, the reported ranges are an artifact of that approximation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that optimal uncoupling has preferred directions in phase space. For the Rössler system coupled through $x$ and $y$, clipping widths oriented at $0.1667\pi \le \theta^* \le 0.3444\pi$ and the mirror range $0.6556\pi \le \theta^* \le 0.8333\pi$ give stable synchronization with larger negative transverse Lyapunov exponents than clipping along either axis; for Chua's circuit coupled through $y$ and $z$, the ranges are $0.1667\pi \le \theta^* \le 0.3111\pi$ and $0.6889\pi \le \theta^* \le 0.8333\pi$. The effectiveness $S(\theta)=\int_0^1 s(f,\theta)\,df$ is symmetric about $\theta=\pi/2$, so the first quadrant suffices. Two-parameter diagrams in the $(\Delta', \varepsilon)$ plane at $\theta^*=\pi/4$ show connected negative-MSF regions, and phase portraits show drive and response synchronized inside the oriented clipped box.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's optimal angle ranges rest on the unproven assumption that the spatial fraction of the clipping box ($\Delta'$) equals the temporal fraction $f$ of the orbit that actually spends inside the box; for a chaotic attractor these need not match.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At fixed coupling strength, certain window orientations keep synchronization stable over a continuous band of clipping fractions, whereas axis-aligned clipping can fail at one end of that band.
  • Because $S(\theta)$ is mirror-symmetric around $\theta=\pi/2$, future searches for optimal directions only need to scan half the orientation circle.
  • The negative-MSF regions in the $(\Delta', \varepsilon)$ plane are connected, so synchronization remains stable as coupling strength is varied, not just at isolated parameter values.
  • The optimal direction is a range rather than a single point, so the scheme tolerates small misalignment of the clipping window in practical implementations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next test is whether the optimal tilt follows the attractor's dominant stretching directions; if so, the optimal range could be predicted from local Lyapunov-vector geometry instead of brute-force scanning.
  • The symmetry about $\pi/2$ suggests a reflection-symmetry proof might exist for a broad class of symmetric couplings, which would reduce search cost in higher-dimensional systems.
  • The reported method could be implemented electronically in Chua's circuit by switching a coupling resistor based on an oriented box mask; the paper does not test this hardware route.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an "optimal uncoupling" method for unidirectionally coupled chaotic systems, in which the phase-space region of the response system over which coupling is active is clipped by a window of width 2Δ with an orientation angle θ. For Rössler and Chua systems, the authors compute the master stability function λ⊥max as a function of θ and a clipping fraction Δ′, define an effectiveness measure S(θ), and report optimal orientation ranges (e.g., 0.1667π ≤ θ* ≤ 0.3444π for Rössler). Synchronization portraits and two-parameter stability diagrams in the Δ′–ε plane are presented to support the claim that orienting the clipping window enhances synchronization stability.

Significance. If the central claim were correct, the paper would introduce a practically useful control parameter—the orientation of the region over which transient uncoupling is active—and would extend the transient-uncoupling mechanism of Schröder et al. to directional control. The paper is clearly organized and applies the proposed method to two standard chaotic systems, with negative-MSF regions visible in the figures. These are genuine strengths. However, the numerical construction used in the paper does not implement an oriented clipping window; it implements an axis-aligned rectangle whose aspect ratio varies with θ. The reported "optimal directions" are therefore not about direction at all, and the main claim is not supported. The additional mismatch between the definition of S(θ) in terms of temporal clipping fraction and its evaluation using spatial clipping fraction, together with the absence of numerical details, further undermines the quantitative conclusions.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III.A, Fig. 1, Eqs. (3)–(7)] The "oriented clipping window" is not a rotated window. In Section III.A the active region is described as the intersection of the components Δx = Δ cosθ and Δy = Δ sinθ, giving the box {|x2 − x*| ≤ Δ cosθ} ∩ {|y2 − y*| ≤ Δ sinθ}. This is an axis-aligned rectangle whose aspect ratio depends on θ, not a strip of width Δ normal to the direction n = (cosθ, sinθ). The two geometries coincide only at θ = 0 and θ = π/2, and at those values the rectangle degenerates to a line segment of zero area. Nevertheless, the text and Fig. 3(a) treat θ = 0 as ordinary x-coupling with a two-dimensional active region, which is internally inconsistent. Consequently, the ranges 0.1667π ≤ θ* ≤ 0.3444π and 0.6556π ≤ θ* ≤ 0.8333π reported in Fig. 2(b) are ranges of box aspect ratio, not of clipping orientation, and the central claim that orienting the clipping window enhances synchronization stability is not supported by the presented construction.
  2. [§III, work steps 2–4 and Eqs. (4)–(6)] The effectiveness metric S(θ) is defined in Eq. (4) as an integral over the temporal clipping fraction f, with f given in Eq. (6) as the long-time average of χA. However, in the work steps, S(θ) is evaluated by scanning the spatial clipping fraction Δ′ = 2Δx,y/Ωx,y. For a chaotic attractor, the fraction of time a trajectory spends inside a box is not generally equal to the box's spatial width fraction, and no such equivalence is proved or even argued. Moreover, Eq. (4) treats f as an integration variable even though f is a single number for a fixed clipping region; the relation between the integral over f and the scan over Δ′ is unexplained. The S(θ) curves used to identify θ* are therefore not justified by the stated definition, which is a second load-bearing problem for the quantitative claims.
  3. [§III.A and §III.B numerical results] No numerical details are provided for the computation of λ⊥max: there is no statement of the integration scheme or time step, the length of transients, the algorithm for transverse Lyapunov exponents, the grid resolution for the θ−Δ′ scans, or any convergence checks or error estimates. The quantitative thresholds (e.g., Δ′ ≥ 0.163 for θ* = π/4 in Fig. 3(c), the stable ranges in Figs. 3(a,b), and the analogous Chua system results in Fig. 7) cannot be reproduced or independently verified from the information given. Since the main results are numerical scans, this omission is a significant reproducibility issue.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§III.A, Fig. 3(a)] The text states the stable range for θ = 0 as 0.1145 ≤ Δ′ ≤ 0.7739, while the Fig. 3 caption states 0.1445; this discrepancy should be corrected.
  2. [Captions of Figs. 3, 4, and 7] There are typos: "dive" should be "drive" in Fig. 4, and "couping" should be "coupling" in Figs. 3 and 7.
  3. [References [1] and [16]] The author name "M. Pecora" should be "L. M. Pecora," and reference [1] is missing the full author list.
  4. [§III.A, Fig. 1] The choice of the attractor center O(x*, y*) used to define the clipping box is a free parameter; the sensitivity of the reported optimal ranges to this choice is not discussed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the optimal orientation ranges are direct MSF-scan outputs, not restatements of fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a numerical result: the optimal clipping-orientation ranges are obtained by scanning the master stability function over θ and clipping fraction, with no parameter fitted to the claimed optimum. S(θ) is defined in Eq. (4) from the synchrony indicator and then evaluated in Section III steps 2–4 over the spatial clipping fraction Δ'; this temporal-versus-spatial mismatch is a consistency concern, not a circular reduction, because the reported θ* ranges are not set equal to any input by construction. The only self-citation, [21], appears in the introduction as background on attractor-size effects and is not load-bearing for the MSF calculation or the orientation scan. The Rössler and Chua results are produced in-model from the stated coupled equations, and the synchronization portraits provide an internal check rather than a circular validation. The geometry objection—that Fig. 1 depicts an axis-aligned rectangle with θ-dependent aspect ratio rather than a genuinely rotated clipping strip—concerns whether the computed quantity matches the claimed interpretation, which is a correctness/interpretation issue outside the circularity definition. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation inherits standard MSF theory and the transient-uncoupling framework from [17]. The paper introduces no new physical entities, and the only hand-chosen input is the clipping center for each attractor. The main unstated load-bearing assumption is the f-Δ' equivalence.

free parameters (1)
  • Attractor center O(x*, y*) for clipping reference = Rössler: (1.2, -1.5); Chua: (-0.116, -0.002)
    Used as the reference point for the clipping region in Figs. 1 and 5; chosen by hand as the nominal center of each attractor. The central claim depends on this choice, though likely not sensitively.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The largest transverse Lyapunov exponent λ⊥max < 0 is a valid criterion for synchronization stability.
    Invoked in Section II Eq. (5) and throughout; standard MSF theory from Pecora and Carroll, stated without derivation.
  • ad hoc to paper The temporal clipping fraction f may be replaced by the spatial clipping fraction Δ' when evaluating S(θ).
    Section III work steps 3-4 scan Δ' to evaluate S, while Eq. (4) integrates over f; the equivalence is not proved and is generally false for chaotic measures.
  • ad hoc to paper An oriented clipping window is equivalent to independent thresholds on two coordinate variables, forming a 2Δx × 2Δy box.
    Figs. 1 and 5 define the active region as the intersection of component widths; this differs from a rotated slab and is asserted geometrically without justification.
  • domain assumption For the Rössler system, deviation along the z-axis can be neglected, so the x-y plane suffices.
    Section III A cites [17] for the claim that z-deviation is minimum; used to restrict clipping to the x-y plane.
  • domain assumption Drive and response systems are identical and unidirectionally coupled, so the synchronization manifold is invariant.
    Used implicitly in Eqs. (7) and (8) for the drive-response configuration.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effect of optimal uncoupling in enhancing synchronization stability in coupled chaotic systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P2E2FQBK

@misc{pith2026190809490,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effect of optimal uncoupling in enhancing synchronization stability in coupled chaotic systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P2E2FQBK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09490}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we report a novel approach for studying the effect of optimal uncoupling on the stability of synchronization in coupled chaotic systems. The clipping of phase space of the driven system having an orientation along the coordinate axes revealing the nature of coupling of the state variables of coupled systems is identified in certain coupled third-order chaotic systems. The stability of synchronization is studied through the {\emph{Master Stability Function}} (MSF). The optimal directions of implementing the clipping width to achieve stable synchronization is observed by studying the effectiveness of clipping fraction and the sufficient range of orientation to identify the optimal directions is reported. The functional work steps for identifying the optimal directions are presented and the synchronization of the response system with the drive within the clipped region of phase space for different orientations of clipping width are studied. The stability of synchronization for different orientations of clipping widths and the two-parameter bifurcation diagram indicating the negative valued MSF regions obtained for the optimal direction of clipping width are presented. The application of the method of optimal uncoupling in identifying the direction of implication of clipping width is discussed and the range of orientation over which the clipping width has to be varied is generalized.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.09490 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (Color Online) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: (Color Online) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (Color Online) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (Color Online) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: (Color Online) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: (Color Online) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: (Color Online) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: (Color Online) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Fix the center of the chaotic attractor of the response syste m ( x∗ 2, y∗

    work page

  2. [2]

    along the co- ordinate axis of the state variable coupled to the drive system

    work page

  3. [3]

    For a fixed value of θ and clipping width ∆ identify the region of phase space within 6 which the coupling strength is active by resolving the horizontal (∆ x = ∆ cosθ) and vertical component (∆ y = ∆ sinθ) of the vector OA (OA = ∆) and estimate λ⊥ max

    work page

  4. [4]

    Vary the clipping fraction ∆ ′ (∆ ′ x = 2∆ x/Ω x, ∆ ′ y = 2∆ y/Ω y) in the range 0 ≤ ∆ ′ ≤ 1 in steps, identify the active phase-phase region of coupling streng th to estimate λ⊥ max in each step and evaluate the effectiveness of clipping fraction S(θ) using the synchrony indicator s(θ) obtained for each step of clipping fraction

    work page

  5. [5]

    Evaluate S(θ) for each value of θ by varying θ in steps in the range 0 ≤ θ ≤ π by repeating steps 2 and 3

    work page

  6. [6]

    Plot S(θ) obtained for the corresponding value of θ to find the optimal directions θ∗. The stability of synchronization of the coupled R¨ osslersystems can be analyzed by observing the MSF to identify the optimal direction of implementing th e clipping width with respect to a particular coordinate axis. Fig. 2(a) shows the variat ion of MSF as functions of...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Pecora, T

    M. Pecora, T. L. Carroll, Synchronization in chaotic sys tems, Physical Review Letters 64 (1990) 821–824. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.821

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.64.821 1990

  8. [8]

    Pikovsky, M

    A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, J. Kurths, J. Kurths, Synchro nization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series, C ambridge University Press, 2003

    work page 2003

Show all 32 references
  1. [9]

    N. F. Rulkov, A. R. Volkoskii, A. Rodri ´ ıguez-Lozano, E. Del R ´ ıo, M. G. Ve- larde, Mutual synchronization of chaotic self-oscillator s with dissipative coupling, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 02 (03) (199 2) 669–676. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127...

    doi

  2. [10]

    doi:10.1142/S0218127492000811

    Leon.O.Chua, Ljupco Kocarev, Kevin Eckert, Makoto Itoh , Experimental chaos synchroniza- tion in chua’s circuit, International Journal of Bifurcati on and Chaos 2 (3) (1992) 705–708. doi:10.1142/S0218127492000811

    1992 doi

  3. [11]

    10 doi:10.1142/S0218126693000071

    Leon.O.Chua, Ljupco Kocarev, Kevin Eckert, Makoto Itoh , Chaos synchronization in chua’s circuit, International Journal of Circuits, Systems and Co mputers 3 (1) (1993) 93–108. 10 doi:10.1142/S0218126693000071

    1993 doi

  4. [12]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.48.R1624

    K.Murali, M.Lakshmanan, Transmission of signals by syn chronization in a chaotic van der pol- duffing oscillator, Physical Review E 48 (1993) 1624–1626. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.48.R1624

    1993 doi

  5. [13]

    S.Zhou, The synchronization of chaotic systems, Physics Reports 366 (2002) 1–101

    S.Boccaletti, J.Kurths, G.Osipov, D.L.Valladares, C. S.Zhou, The synchronization of chaotic systems, Physics Reports 366 (2002) 1–101. doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00137-0

    2002 doi

  6. [14]

    M. Chen, M. Sun, H. Bao, Y. Hu, B. Bao, Fluxcharge analysis of two-memristor-based Chua’s circuit: Dimensionality decreasing model for detecting ex treme multistability, IEEE Transac- tions on Industrial Electronics 67 (3) (2020) 2197–2206. doi:10.1109/TIE.2019.2907444

    2020

  7. [15]

    A. V. Oppenheim, G. W. Wornell, S. H. Isabelle, K. M. Cuomo , Signal processing in the context of chaotic signals, in: [Proceedings] ICASSP-9 2: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Vo l. 4, 1992, pp. 117–120. doi:10.1109/ICASSP.1992.226472

    1992

  8. [16]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.49.4882

    K.Murali, M.Lakshmanan, Drive-response scenario of c haos synchronization in identical non- linear systems, Physical Review E 49 (1994) 4882–4885. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.49.4882

    1994 doi

  9. [17]

    Murali, M

    K. Murali, M. Lakshmanan, Efficient signal transmission by synchronization through compound chaotic signal, Phys. Rev. E 56 (1997) 251–255. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.56.251. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.56.251

    1997 doi

  10. [18]

    A. A. Koronovskii, O. I. Moskalenko, A. E. Hramov, On the use of chaotic synchronization for secure communicat ion, Physics-Uspekhi 52 (2009) 1213 – 1238. doi:https://doi.org/10.3367/ufne.0179.200912c.1281. URL https://doi.org/10.3367%2Fufne.0179.200912c.1281

    2009

  11. [19]

    Z. Wu, X. Zhang, X. Zhong, Generalized chaos synchroniz ation circuit sim- ulation and asymmetric image encryption, IEEE Access 7 (201 9) 37989–38008. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906770

    2019

  12. [20]

    J. Wang, W. Yu, J. Wang, Y. Zhao, J. Zhang, D. Jiang, A new six-dimensional hyperchaotic system and its secure co mmunication circuit implementation, International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications 4 7 (5) 702–

  13. [21]

    Sivaganesh, A

    G. Sivaganesh, A. Arulgnanam, A.N. Seethalakshmi, Sta bility enhancement by induced synchronization using trans ient uncoupling in certain coupled chaotic systems, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 123 (2019) 217 – 228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.04.009. URL http://www....

    2019 doi

  14. [22]

    N. Wang, C. Li, H. Bao, M. Chen, B. Bao, Generating multi- scroll Chua’s attractors via sim- 11 plified piecewise-linear Chua’s diode, IEEE Transactions o n Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers 66 (12) (2019) 4767–4779. doi:10.1109/TCSI.2019.2933365

    2019

  15. [23]

    Pecora, T

    M. Pecora, T. L. Carroll, Master stability functions fo r synchronized coupled systems, Physical Review Letters 80 (1998) 2109–2112. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2109

    1998 doi

  16. [24]

    Schr¨ oder, M

    M. Schr¨ oder, M. Mannattil, D. Dutta, S. Chakraborty, M . Timme, Transient uncoupling induces synchronization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 054101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.054101. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.054101

    2015 doi

  17. [25]

    Schr¨ oder, S

    M. Schr¨ oder, S. Chakraborty, D. Witthaut, J. Nagler, M . Timme, Interaction con- trol to synchronize non-synchronizable networks, Scienti fic Reports 6 (2016) 37142. doi:10.1038/srep37142

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    Tandon, M

    A. Tandon, M. Schr¨ oder, M. Mannattil, M. Timme, S. Chak raborty, Synchronizing noisy nonidentical oscillators by transien t uncoupling, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 26 (9) (2 016) 094817. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4959141, doi:10.1063/1.4959...

    doi

  19. [27]

    Ghosh, P

    A. Ghosh, P. Godara, S. Chakraborty, Understanding tra nsient uncoupling induced synchronization through modifie d dynamic coupling, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 2 8 (5) (2018) 053112. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5016148, doi:10.1063/1.5016148. U...

    2018 doi

  20. [29]

    Pecora, T

    M. Pecora, T. L. Carroll, A. Johnson, J. Mar, J. F. Heagy, Fundamentals of synchronization in chaotic systems, concepts, and applications, Chaos 7 (1997 ) 520–543. doi:10.1063/1.166278

    1997 doi

  21. [30]

    R¨ ossler, An equation for continuous chaos, Physics Letters A 57 (5) (1976) 397 – 398

    O. R¨ ossler, An equation for continuous chaos, Physics Letters A 57 (5) (1976) 397 – 398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(76)90101-8

    1976 doi

  22. [31]

    Matsumoto, A chaotic attractor from chua’s circuit, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems 31 (12) (1984) 1055–1058

    T. Matsumoto, A chaotic attractor from chua’s circuit, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems 31 (12) (1984) 1055–1058. doi:10.1109/TCS.1984.1085459

    1984

  23. [32]

    Matsumoto, L

    T. Matsumoto, L. O. Chua, M. Komuro, The double scroll, I EEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems 32 (8) (1985) 797–818. doi:10.1109/TCS.1985.1085791. 12 -12 -8 -4 0 4 8 -10 -5 0 5 10 y1, y2 x1, x2 2∆ x 2∆ y θ ∆ ∆ ∆ x ∆ y O FIG. 1: (Color Online) R¨ osslersystem: Clipping of ...

    1985

  24. [717]

    URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/cta.2617

    arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cta.2617, doi:10.1002/cta.2617. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/cta.2617

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.