Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On the novel geometric and negative binomial INAR(1) processes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.02664 v2 pith:PAIZM3FY submitted 2023-09-06 math.PR

classification math.PR
keywords approachciteinar1novelthinningmodelsprocessbinomial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Guerrero et al. \cite{GBSO} propose a novel approach to building first-order integer-valued autoregressive (\inar1) models based on the concept of thinning. The standard approach requires that the thinning operator be defined first and \inar1 models with either a specified marginal (the forward approach) or a specified innovation (the backward approach) are developed. In contrast, the approach in \cite{GBSO} is to start out by specifying both the marginal distribution of the process and that of its innovation sequence, and then proceed to identify the thinning operator by solving a functional equation. In this article we discuss the connection between the thinning operators the authors obtained for their novel geometric and negative binomial \inar1 models and the thinning operator introduced in \cite{AB1} and \cite{AB2}. More specifically, we show that the existence of the two models has been established in \cite{AB1} using the forward approach and a different parameterization. In the process, we strenghthen some of the authors' results obtained for the novel geometric \inar1 process and we extend their results to the novel negative binomial \inar1 process.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Language Models Coupled with Metacognition Can Outperform Reasoning Models

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An iterative metacognitive feedback loop lets a fast LLM match or outperform a standalone reasoning model on graph coloring and code debugging, with selective fallback to the reasoning model only when needed.

Pith tools