REVIEW 1 cited by
On the novel geometric and negative binomial INAR(1) processes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Guerrero et al. \cite{GBSO} propose a novel approach to building first-order integer-valued autoregressive (\inar1) models based on the concept of thinning. The standard approach requires that the thinning operator be defined first and \inar1 models with either a specified marginal (the forward approach) or a specified innovation (the backward approach) are developed. In contrast, the approach in \cite{GBSO} is to start out by specifying both the marginal distribution of the process and that of its innovation sequence, and then proceed to identify the thinning operator by solving a functional equation. In this article we discuss the connection between the thinning operators the authors obtained for their novel geometric and negative binomial \inar1 models and the thinning operator introduced in \cite{AB1} and \cite{AB2}. More specifically, we show that the existence of the two models has been established in \cite{AB1} using the forward approach and a different parameterization. In the process, we strenghthen some of the authors' results obtained for the novel geometric \inar1 process and we extend their results to the novel negative binomial \inar1 process.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Language Models Coupled with Metacognition Can Outperform Reasoning Models
An iterative metacognitive feedback loop lets a fast LLM match or outperform a standalone reasoning model on graph coloring and code debugging, with selective fallback to the reasoning model only when needed.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.