Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 83 references

EL CMi: confirmation of triaxial pulsation theory

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The primary star of EL CMi is the first observed system with a quadrupole tidally tilted standing mode, confirming triaxial pulsation theory.

desk verdict A plausible but not yet quantitatively demonstrated first quadrupole TTS mode; the binary characterization is solid, and the missing piece is a real fit to the mode template. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.21255 v1 pith:PCMLZMGX submitted 2025-07-28 astro-ph.SR

G. Handler , S. A. Rappaport , D. Jones , A. Miszuda , M. Omohundro , R. Jayaraman , R. Gagliano , J. Fuller
show 5 more authors
D. W. Kurtz J. Munday H.-L. Chen B. P. Powell V. B. Kostov
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords triaxialpulsatorstidallytiltedstandingmodesTTSquadrupoleasteroseismologyclosebinariesDeltaScutistarsTESSphotometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that the pulsating primary of the eclipsing binary EL CMi is a triaxial pulsator: it simultaneously oscillates about three different axes, with two dipole modes whose axes lie in the orbital plane and one quadrupole mode. The quadrupole mode, identified as a $Y_2^{2-}$ tidally tilted standing (TTS) mode, is the first such mode detected in any star. This result tests and confirms the recent theoretical prediction that TTS modes exist beyond the dipole case and can be recognized in TESS photometry through the orbital modulation of pulsation amplitude and phase. The paper also determines the binary's physical and evolutionary state, showing that the primary is a $\delta$ Scuti star that has accreted and is still accreting from a Roche-lobe-filling donor that will become a low-mass helium white dwarf. A sympathetic reader would care because this turns a close binary into a three-dimensional asteroseismic probe of a star that has exchanged mass.

What carries the argument

The central theoretical object is the Tidally Tilted Standing (TTS) mode, a pulsation mode that arises in a star deformed by a close companion when tidal, centrifugal, and Coriolis forces couple spherical-harmonic modes of the same degree. TTS modes are standing patterns that stay nearly fixed with respect to the companion rather than travelling around the star. The paper uses the theoretical amplitude and phase modulation templates for dipole and quadrupole TTS modes, with the quadrupole $Y_2^{2-}$ mode being a superposition of $Y_2^{+2}$ and $Y_2^{-2}$ about the tidal axis, and compares them to the observed variation of each pulsation's amplitude and phase over the orbital cycle, reconstructed after removing the primary eclipse to suppress spatial filtering. An Echelle diagram built on the orbital frequency identifies which detected frequencies belong to the same TTS multiplet.

What would settle it

A longer or higher-cadence dataset that detects the undetected central frequency of the 44.2 d$^{-1}$ dipole multiplet and shows its amplitude and phase modulation differing from the $Y_1^0$ template, or that shows the 40.5 d$^{-1}$ quadrupole modulation changing when different eclipse-masking and detrending choices are used, would refute the TTS identification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using TESS photometry from Sectors 34, 61, and 88, the authors detect three dominant pulsation families in the primary of EL CMi, each appearing as a multiplet spaced by the orbital frequency. Two of them, at 43.7 and 44.2 d$^{-1}$, show amplitude and phase modulation across the orbit matching $Y_1^0$ dipole TTS modes with their axes in the orbital plane (denoted $Y_{10x}$ and $Y_{10y}$); the third, at 40.5 d$^{-1}$, shows a distinctly different modulation matching the quadrupole $Y_2^{2-}$ TTS mode, a standing superposition of $Y_2^{+2}$ and $Y_2^{-2}$ patterns wrapped around the tidal axis with maxima and minima offset by $\pi/4$. The central frequency of the 44.2 d$^{-1}$ multiplet is not detected above S/N 1.5, so that mode's identification rests on its two sidebands and the theoretical template. Multi-sector consistency, the removal of primary-eclipse data to avoid spatial filtering, and matching to the predicted amplitude and phase runs support the identification. Combined with new radial velocities, simultaneous spectral-energy-distribution and light-curve modeling, and binary evolution calculations, the photometry yields a system whose primary is a typical $\delta$ Scuti star in a post-mass-transfer state with a donor heading toward a helium white dwarf.

Load-bearing premise

The mode identifications assume that the observed variation of each pulsation's amplitude and phase over the orbit is the intrinsic geometric signature of a standing TTS mode, unaffected by the removal of eclipse data, by time-varying pulsation amplitudes, or by unresolved close frequencies.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the identification stands, quadrupole TTS modes are real and detectable, extending the triaxial pulsation framework beyond the dipole case.
  • EL CMi becomes the third known triaxial pulsator, and previously discovered tidally tilted or single-sided pulsators can plausibly be viewed as special cases of the same triaxial framework.
  • The pulsating primary is an active, still-accreting post-mass-transfer $\delta$ Scuti star, so its oscillation modes offer asteroseismic access to a star that has been rejuvenated by accretion.
  • Because the donor is predicted to become a low-mass helium white dwarf, the system documents the post-mass-transfer evolutionary stage of a close binary on its way to a white-dwarf companion.
  • Future systems with richer pulsation spectra could allow asteroseismic mapping of stellar interiors in three dimensions using modes around three different symmetry axes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same amplitude-and-phase-template search could be run over archival TESS light curves of other eclipsing binaries to look for further quadrupole TTS modes, including systems with lower-S/N data where only sidebands are visible.
  • The undetected central component of the 44.2 d$^{-1}$ triplet suggests that some TTS modes may be identifiable only by their sideband structure; if this suppression is geometric rather than accidental, future high-cadence observations should confirm a stable ratio of sideband to central amplitude across epochs.
  • If the triaxial interpretation survives, the eclipse-mapping distortion seen in the quadrupole mode's amplitude and phase curve is itself a probe of the surface intensity pattern of a quadrupole mode, potentially constraining the mode's horizontal displacement field.
  • The evolutionary model implies that, after the donor becomes a helium white dwarf, the system will undergo common-envelope evolution and merge, making EL CMi a rare snapshot of a binary shortly before such a fate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes TESS photometry and new spectroscopy of the eclipsing binary EL CMi, reporting the first detection of a quadrupole Tidally Tilted Standing (TTS) mode, identified as a Y22− mode, together with two dipole TTS modes (Y10x and Y10y) in the pulsating primary. The authors characterize the binary with radial velocities, PHOEBE modeling, and a joint SED plus light-curve fit, and present MESA binary-evolution models indicating a prior mass-transfer episode with the secondary now a Roche-lobe-filling or near-Roche-lobe-filling donor that will become a low-mass helium white dwarf. The pulsational mode identifications are based on the orbital-phase dependence of the amplitudes and phases of the detected frequency multiplets, compared qualitatively with the theoretical templates of Fuller et al. (2025).

Significance. If the mode identifications are correct, this is the first observational detection of a quadrupole TTS mode and provides a strong confirmation of the triaxial pulsation theory of Fuller et al. (2025). The paper is also valuable for its detailed binary characterization of a post-mass-transfer delta Scuti system and for making the MESA evolutionary models publicly available on Zenodo. The qualitative agreement of the amplitude and phase curves with the theoretical templates across three independent TESS sectors is a genuine strength, as is the use of theoretical predictions that were not fitted to this specific object. However, the central claim of a first quadrupole TTS detection currently rests on visual consistency rather than on a quantitative model comparison, which limits the force of the confirmation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sect. 2.1, Fig. 5, Table 2] The identification of ν3 as a Y22− quadrupole TTS mode is asserted from visual inspection of the reconstructed amplitude and phase curves, but no quantitative comparison is presented. The paper does not overlay the theoretical Y22− template on the data, does not define or report a goodness-of-fit statistic, and does not test alternative mode geometries (e.g., Y20, Y10x/y, an eccentric dipole, or a pair of unresolved independent modes) against the same curves. Since only the ν3−2f_orb, ν3, and ν3+2f_orb components are measured after eclipse removal (Table 2), the discriminating power of these three amplitudes and phases is limited, and the uniqueness of the Y22− assignment is not established without a fit that includes the known orbital inclination and limb darkening.
  2. [Sect. 2.1, Table 2] The identification of ν2 as a Y10y dipole mode is made even though the central component of the triplet is undetected with S/N < 1.5 in all three sectors. The entire identification rests on the two sidebands and on the theoretical template. The paper should at least quantify how strongly the observed sideband amplitude ratio and phase difference constrain the Y10y geometry relative to a Y10x mode or to a simple single-sided dipole, and should state the significance of the non-detection of the central component for the mode assignment.
  3. [Sect. 3.4, Table 4] There is a direct contradiction between the text following Table 4 and the numbers in the table. The text states that when the secondary is assumed to fill its Roche lobe the primary is 24%±11% larger than the secondary, and that without that assumption the two stars are more nearly equal in size with the secondary slightly larger. However, Table 4 shows R1=1.85±0.11, R2=2.00±0.03 for the Roche-lobe-filling case (so the secondary is larger), and R1=2.14±0.11, R2=1.72±0.12 for the non-overfilling case (so the primary is about 24% larger). This reversal affects the interpretation of which evolutionary model is preferred and must be corrected.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Table 5] The column heading 'K2^c [K]' should read 'K2^c [km s−1]'.
  2. [Sect. 3.1] The heading 'Data Availability' is misleading for a section that describes Gaia photometry, reddening, and archival SED fluxes; a heading such as 'Archival Photometry and SED' would be clearer.
  3. [Sect. 2.1, Fig. 2] The text says the dotted cross in the Échelle diagram marks the expected location of the centroid of mode ν2, but it would be helpful to state explicitly how that expected location was computed, given that the central mode itself is undetected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the TTS mode identifications compare TESS data to separately published, unfitted theoretical predictions; the overlapping-author theory is independent, falsifiable support.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against an external theoretical benchmark. The paper's central claim—that ν1, ν2, and ν3 are Y10x, Y10y, and Y22− TTS modes—rests on comparing the observed orbital-phase amplitude and phase modulation (Sect. 2.1, Fig. 5) with the theoretical predictions of Fuller et al. (2025), which were not fitted to EL CMi. The multiplet frequencies are fixed by the independently determined orbital frequency rather than by the TTS amplitude template, and the binary parameters used for any geometric projection (inclination, radii, limb darkening) come from the Sect. 3 light-curve, radial-velocity, and SED fits, not from the pulsation modulation itself. The 'prediction' of the secondary's K-velocity and the helium-white-dwarf future are consequences of the fitted binary and MESA evolution model, not of the pulsation data. The principal weakness is evidentiary rather than circular: the Y22− assignment is asserted by visual consistency without an overlaid theoretical curve or a quantitative comparison to alternative mode geometries, and ν2's central component is undetected. However, that is a robustness and correctness concern, not a reduction of the conclusion to its inputs. The overlap between the present author list and Fuller et al. (2025) is a self-citation, but that cited theory is separately published, externally falsifiable, and does not incorporate the EL CMi result; it is therefore genuine support and at most a minor, non-load-bearing self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central pulsation identification relies on the orbital ephemeris, inclination, and mass ratio fitted from the same TESS data, plus the external TTS theory. The evolutionary scenario adds fitted SED+LC parameters and fixed stellar physics assumptions. No new physical entity is required for the pulsation claim; the only invented entity is the ad hoc star spot explanation for an anomalous Doppler term.

free parameters (4)
  • Orbital period P_orb = 1.05384979(7) d
    Fitted to TESS eclipse times; it sets the multiplet spacing used to identify TTS modes.
  • Orbital inclination i = 78.6 +/- 0.05 deg (PHOEBE); 76.9 +/- 0.7 or 80.6 +/- 2.3 deg (SED+LC)
    Fitted from eclipse light curves; enters the theoretical amplitude and phase curves used for mode identification.
  • PHOEBE binary parameters = M1=1.78+/-0.03, M2=0.93+/-0.01, R1=1.88+/-0.01, R2=1.97+/-0.01 in solar units
    Fitted with MCMC to the light curve and radial velocities; underlying system characterization, not directly the pulsation claim.
  • SED+light curve fit parameters = M1=1.70-1.75, M2=0.96-0.97, R2=1.72-2.00, Teff,2~5100 K, tau~1.7 Gyr, AV~0.08
    Six fitted quantities in the joint SED and light curve model; needed for the evolutionary interpretation.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption TTS theory of Fuller et al. (2025): tidal, centrifugal, and Coriolis perturbations couple modes of equal spherical degree into standing modes aligned with the principal axes of the triaxially deformed star.
    Invoked in Sect. 2.1 to identify the observed amplitude and phase modulation as Y10x, Y10y, and Y22- modes.
  • domain assumption The pulsating primary is close to hydrostatic equilibrium and the ongoing accretion does not significantly alter its structure or pulsations.
    Stated at the end of Sect. 4; this justifies applying the triaxial pulsation model to an accreting star.
  • domain assumption MESA binary evolution with fixed overshooting f_ov=0.02, mixing length alpha_MLT=1.5, and mass transfer efficiency beta=0.2 reproduces the system.
    Sect. 4 grid calculations adopt these values from Claret & Torres (2016) and Miszuda et al. (2022); they are not derived in this paper.
  • standard math Fourier significance criteria from Baran & Koen (2021) correctly separate true pulsation frequencies from noise.
    Used in Sect. 2.1 to stop prewhitening and to select the final frequency list.
invented entities (1)
  • Star spots on the cool secondary star
    purpose: To explain the measured sin(omega t) Doppler boosting term that is an order of magnitude larger than physically plausible and opposite in sign to the prediction.
    Introduced ad hoc in the Table 5 note and Sect. 3.4. No independent observation of spots is presented.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of EL CMi: confirmation of triaxial pulsation theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PCMLZMGX

@misc{pith2026250721255,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: EL CMi: confirmation of triaxial pulsation theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PCMLZMGX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.21255}
}
read the original abstract

Triaxial pulsators are a recently discovered group of oscillating stars in close binary systems that show pulsations around three axes at the same time. It has recently been theoretically shown that new types of pulsation modes, the Tidally Tilted Standing (TTS) modes, can arise in such stars. Here, we report the first detection of a quadrupole TTS oscillation mode in the pulsating component of the binary system EL CMi following an analysis of TESS space photometry. Two dipole oscillations around different axes in the orbital plane are present as well. In addition, the binary system is characterized using new radial velocity measurements, phoebe as well as simultaneous spectral energy distribution and light curve modeling. The pulsating primary component has properties typical of a Delta Scuti star but has accreted and is still accreting mass from its Roche Lobe filling companion. The donor star is predicted to evolve into a low-mass helium white dwarf. EL CMi demonstrates the potential of asteroseismic inferences of the structure of stars in close binaries before and after mass transfer and in three spatial dimensions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.21255 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Fourier Transforms of the Sector 34 TESS data for EL CMi with subsequent prewhitening steps (first, only the orbital harmonics, then the orbital harmonics plus seven, 18 and 19 pulsation frequencies indicated by the blue arrows, respectively) indicated. The inset in the top panel is the spectral window function of this data set. The level of the SNR curve is applicable for all of these amplitude spectra but is plott… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The run of the pulsation amplitude and phase for the three main modes of EL CMi. Black: Sector 34 data. Red: Sector 61 data. Blue: Sector 88 data. Upper panel: orbital light curve. Second and third panels: using all data. Lower two panels: reconstructions from the data…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The orbital NOT radial velocities (black points) with the simple Keplerian (red line) and the PHOEBE (blue line) fits that also include the predicted Rossiter-McLaughlin signature (Rossiter 1924; McLaughlin 1924) The uncertainties on the measurements are about the size…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The fit to the SED of the EL CMi system. The orange dots with the error bars are the observational values. The blue line is the SED of the primary star, the red line the SED that of the secondary and the black line is the sum of the two. third results column in [PITH_…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The HR Diagram and the time evolution of the stellar masses, radii, effective temperatures, Roche lobe filling factor and the orbital period for the binary evolution track that best reproduces the observed parameters of the system. This track was computed for the follo…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  3. [3]

    2021, Reviews of Modern Physics, 93, 015001, 10.1103/RevModPhys.93.015001

    Aerts , C. 2021, Reviews of Modern Physics, 93, 015001, 10.1103/RevModPhys.93.015001

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.93.015001 2021

  4. [4]

    J., & Scott , P

    Asplund , M., Grevesse , N., Sauval , A. J., & Scott , P. 2009, , 47, 481, 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222

    arXiv 2009

  5. [5]

    2006, in 36th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, Vol

    Baglin , A., Auvergne , M., Boisnard , L., et al. 2006, in 36th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, Vol. 36, 3749

    2006

  6. [6]

    Balona , L. A. 2014, , 439, 3453, 10.1093/mnras/stu193

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu193 2014

  7. [7]

    S., & Koen , C

    Baran , A. S., & Koen , C. 2021, , 71, 113, 10.32023/0001-5237/71.2.3

    doi:10.32023/0001-5237/71.2.3 2021

  8. [8]

    R., Murphy , S

    Bedding , T. R., Murphy , S. J., Hey , D. R., et al. 2020, , 581, 147, 10.1038/s41586-020-2226-8

    doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2226-8 2020

Show all 83 references
  1. [9]

    2021, Experimental Astronomy, 51, 109, 10.1007/s10686-020-09679-4

    Benz , W., Broeg , C., Fortier , A., et al. 2021, Experimental Astronomy, 51, 109, 10.1007/s10686-020-09679-4

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    2017, , 230, 24, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa7053

    Bianchi , L., Shiao , B., & Thilker , D. 2017, , 230, 24, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa7053

    2017 doi

  3. [11]

    B., & Derekas , A

    B \'o kon , A., B \' r \'o , I. B., & Derekas , A. 2025, , 693, A259, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452000

    2025 doi

  4. [12]

    M., Burssens , S., Pedersen , M

    Bowman , D. M., Burssens , S., Pedersen , M. G., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 760, 10.1038/s41550-019-0768-1

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    1993, , 271, 482

    Breger , M., Stich , J., Garrido , R., et al. 1993, , 271, 482

    1993

  6. [14]

    M., Michielsen , M., et al

    Burssens , S., Bowman , D. M., Michielsen , M., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 913, 10.1038/s41550-023-01978-y

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    A., Rappaport , S., & Fabrycky , D

    Carter , J. A., Rappaport , S., & Fabrycky , D. 2011, , 728, 139, 10.1088/0004-637X/728/2/139

    2011 doi

  8. [17]

    Castelli , F., & Kurucz , R. L. 2003 b , in Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres, ed. N. Piskunov , W. W. Weiss , & D. F. Gray , Vol. 210, A20, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0405087

    2003 doi arXiv

  9. [18]

    C., Magnier , E

    Chambers , K. C., Magnier , E. A., Metcalfe , N., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05560, 10.48550/arXiv.1612.05560

    2016 doi arXiv

  10. [20]

    2016 b , , 823, 102, 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    ---. 2016 b , , 823, 102, 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    2016 doi

  11. [21]

    2016, , 592, A15, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628779

    Claret , A., & Torres , G. 2016, , 592, A15, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628779

    2016 doi

  12. [22]

    2016, , 222, 8, 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    Dotter , A. 2016, , 222, 8, 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    2016 doi

  13. [23]

    W., Alexander , D

    Ferguson , J. W., Alexander , D. R., Allard , F., et al. 2005, , 623, 585, 10.1086/428642

    2005 doi

  14. [24]

    W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J

    Foreman-Mackey , D., Hogg , D. W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J. 2013, , 125, 306, 10.1086/670067

    2013 doi

  15. [25]

    W., Handler , G., & Rappaport , S

    Fuller , J., Kurtz , D. W., Handler , G., & Rappaport , S. 2020, , 498, 5730, 10.1093/mnras/staa2376

    2020 doi

  16. [26]

    2025, , 979, 80, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9eb2

    Fuller , J., Rappaport , S., Jayaraman , R., Kurtz , D., & Handler , G. 2025, , 979, 80, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9eb2

    2025 doi

  17. [27]

    Gaia Collaboration , Prusti , T., de Bruijne , J. H. J., et al. 2016, , 595, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629272

    2016 doi

  18. [28]

    Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari , A., Brown , A. G. A., et al. 2023, , 674, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    2023 doi

  19. [29]

    L., Brown , T

    Gilliland , R. L., Brown , T. M., Christensen-Dalsgaard , J., et al. 2010, , 122, 131, 10.1086/650399

    2010 doi

  20. [30]

    2024, , 972, 137, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5282

    Gootkin , K., Hon , M., Huber , D., et al. 2024, , 972, 137, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5282

    2024 doi

  21. [31]

    O., & Corbally , C

    Gray , R. O., & Corbally , C. J. 1994, , 107, 742, 10.1086/116893

    1994 doi

  22. [32]

    M., Schlafly , E., Zucker , C., Speagle , J

    Green , G. M., Schlafly , E., Zucker , C., Speagle , J. S., & Finkbeiner , D. 2019, , 887, 93, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362

    2019 doi

  23. [33]

    E., Carr , M., Rockosi , C., et al

    Gunn , J. E., Carr , M., Rockosi , C., et al. 1998, , 116, 3040, 10.1086/300645

    1998 doi

  24. [34]

    W., Rappaport , S

    Handler , G., Kurtz , D. W., Rappaport , S. A., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 684, 10.1038/s41550-020-1035-1

    2020 doi

  25. [35]

    S., & Bodenheimer , P

    Henyey , L., Vardya , M. S., & Bodenheimer , P. 1965, , 142, 841, 10.1086/148357

    1965 doi

  26. [36]

    S., et al

    Hon , M., Huber , D., Kuszlewicz , J. S., et al. 2021, , 919, 131, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac14b1

    2021 doi

  27. [37]

    J., Christensen-Dalsgaard , J., et al

    Huber , D., Chaplin , W. J., Christensen-Dalsgaard , J., et al. 2013, , 767, 127, 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/127

    2013 doi

  28. [38]

    A., et al

    Jayaraman , R., Handler , G., Rappaport , S. A., et al. 2022 a , , 928, L14, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c59

    2022 doi

  29. [39]

    A., Nelson , L., et al

    Jayaraman , R., Rappaport , S. A., Nelson , L., et al. 2022 b , , 936, 123, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac84d0

    2022 doi

  30. [40]

    A., Powell , B., et al

    Jayaraman , R., Rappaport , S. A., Powell , B., et al. 2024, , 975, 121, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad77c3

    2024 doi

  31. [41]

    A., et al

    Jennings , Z., Southworth , J., Rappaport , S. A., et al. 2024, , 533, 2705, 10.1093/mnras/stae1879

    2024 doi

  32. [42]

    S., Bauer , E

    Jermyn , A. S., Bauer , E. B., Schwab , J., et al. 2023, , 265, 15, 10.3847/1538-4365/acae8d

    2023 doi

  33. [43]

    2022, , 510, 1413, 10.1093/mnras/stab3515

    Kahraman Ali c avu s , F., Handler , G., Ali c avu s , F., et al. 2022, , 510, 1413, 10.1093/mnras/stab3515

    2022 doi

  34. [44]

    Kippenhahn , R., Ruschenplatt , G., & Thomas , H. C. 1980, , 91, 175

    1980

  35. [45]

    1967, , 65, 251

    Kippenhahn , R., & Weigert , A. 1967, , 65, 251

    1967

  36. [46]

    G., Borucki , W

    Koch , D. G., Borucki , W. J., Basri , G., et al. 2010, , 713, L79, 10.1088/2041-8205/713/2/L79

    2010 doi

  37. [47]

    1990, , 236, 385

    Kolb , U., & Ritter , H. 1990, , 236, 385

    1990

  38. [48]

    B., Powell , B

    Kostov , V. B., Powell , B. P., Fornear , A. U., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.05631, 10.48550/arXiv.2506.05631

    2025 doi arXiv

  39. [49]

    Kurtz , D. W. 2022, , 60, 31, 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-094232

    2022 doi

  40. [50]

    W., Handler , G., Rappaport , S

    Kurtz , D. W., Handler , G., Rappaport , S. A., et al. 2020, , 494, 5118, 10.1093/mnras/staa989

    2020 doi

  41. [51]

    W., Handler , G., Holdsworth , D

    Kurtz , D. W., Handler , G., Holdsworth , D. L., et al. 2025, , 536, 2103, 10.1093/mnras/stae2708

    2025 doi

  42. [52]

    F., & Fricke , K

    Langer , N., El Eid , M. F., & Fricke , K. J. 1985, , 145, 179

    1985

  43. [53]

    2005, Communications in Asteroseismology, 146, 53, 10.1553/cia146s53

    Lenz , P., & Breger , M. 2005, Communications in Asteroseismology, 146, 53, 10.1553/cia146s53

    2005 doi

  44. [54]

    Lightkurve Collaboration , Cardoso , J. V. d. M., Hedges , C., et al. 2018, Lightkurve: Kepler and TESS time series analysis in Python , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1812.013

    2018

  45. [55]

    McLaughlin , D. B. 1924, , 60, 22, 10.1086/142826

    1924 doi

  46. [56]

    A., Szewczuk , W., & Daszy \'n ska-Daszkiewicz , J

    Miszuda , A., Ko aczek-Szyma \'n ski , P. A., Szewczuk , W., & Daszy \'n ska-Daszkiewicz , J. 2022, , 514, 622, 10.1093/mnras/stac1197

    2022 doi

  47. [57]

    L., Twicken , J

    Morris , R. L., Twicken , J. D., Smith , J. C., et al. 2020, Kepler Data Processing Handbook: Photometric Analysis , Kepler Science Document KSCI-19081-003, id. 6. Edited by Jon M. Jenkins

    2020

  48. [58]

    2000, , 143, 23, 10.1051/aas:2000169

    Ochsenbein , F., Bauer , P., & Marcout , J. 2000, , 143, 23, 10.1051/aas:2000169

    2000 doi

  49. [59]

    2011, , 192, 3, 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    Paxton , B., Bildsten , L., Dotter , A., et al. 2011, , 192, 3, 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    2011 doi

  50. [60]

    2013, , 208, 4, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    Paxton , B., Cantiello , M., Arras , P., et al. 2013, , 208, 4, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    2013 doi

  51. [61]

    2015, , 220, 15, 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    Paxton , B., Marchant , P., Schwab , J., et al. 2015, , 220, 15, 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    2015 doi

  52. [62]

    B., et al

    Paxton , B., Schwab , J., Bauer , E. B., et al. 2018, , 234, 34, 10.3847/1538-4365/aaa5a8

    2018 doi

  53. [63]

    2019, , 243, 10, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab2241

    Paxton , B., Smolec , R., Schwab , J., et al. 2019, , 243, 10, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab2241

    2019 doi

  54. [64]

    J., & Mamajek , E

    Pecaut , M. J., & Mamajek , E. E. 2013, , 208, 9, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9

    2013 doi

  55. [65]

    P., Kostov , V

    Powell , B. P., Kostov , V. B., Rappaport , S. A., et al. 2021, , 161, 162, 10.3847/1538-3881/abddb5

    2021 doi

  56. [66]

    X., Hennawi, J

    Prochaska, J. X., Hennawi, J. F., Westfall, K. B., et al. 2020a, Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2308, 10.21105/joss.02308

    doi

  57. [67]

    X., Hennawi , J., Cooke , R., et al

    Prochaska , J. X., Hennawi , J., Cooke , R., et al. 2020b, pypeit/PypeIt: Release 1.0.0 , v1.0.0, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3743493

    doi

  58. [68]

    E., Horvat , M., et al

    Pr s a , A., Conroy , K. E., Horvat , M., et al. 2016, , 227, 29, 10.3847/1538-4365/227/2/29

    2016 doi

  59. [69]

    A., Kurtz , D

    Rappaport , S. A., Kurtz , D. W., Handler , G., et al. 2021, , 503, 254, 10.1093/mnras/stab336

    2021 doi

  60. [70]

    A., Borkovits , T., Gagliano , R., et al

    Rappaport , S. A., Borkovits , T., Gagliano , R., et al. 2022, , 513, 4341, 10.1093/mnras/stac957

    2022 doi

  61. [71]

    2014, Experimental Astronomy, 38, 249, 10.1007/s10686-014-9383-4

    Rauer , H., Catala , C., Aerts , C., et al. 2014, Experimental Astronomy, 38, 249, 10.1007/s10686-014-9383-4

    2014 doi

  62. [72]

    D., Brondel , B

    Reed , M. D., Brondel , B. J., & Kawaler , S. D. 2005, , 634, 602, 10.1086/491666

    2005 doi

  63. [73]

    R., Winn , J

    Ricker , G. R., Winn , J. N., Vanderspek , R., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003, 10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003

    2015 doi

  64. [74]

    Rossiter , R. A. 1924, , 60, 15, 10.1086/142825

    1924 doi

  65. [75]

    J., Finkbeiner , D

    Schlegel , D. J., Finkbeiner , D. P., & Davis , M. 1998, , 500, 525, 10.1086/305772

    1998 doi

  66. [76]

    F., Cutri , R

    Skrutskie , M. F., Cutri , R. M., Stiening , R., et al. 2006, , 131, 1163, 10.1086/498708

    2006 doi

  67. [77]

    C., Stumpe , M

    Smith , J. C., Stumpe , M. C., Van Cleve , J. E., et al. 2012, , 124, 1000, 10.1086/667697

    2012 doi

  68. [78]

    C., Smith , J

    Stumpe , M. C., Smith , J. C., Van Cleve , J. E., et al. 2012, , 124, 985, 10.1086/667698

    2012 doi

  69. [79]

    1986, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Tody , D. 1986, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 627, Instrumentation in astronomy VI, ed. D. L. Crawford , 733, 10.1117/12.968154

    1986 doi

  70. [80]

    2010, , 140, 1158, 10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1158

    Torres , G. 2010, , 140, 1158, 10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1158

    2010 doi

  71. [81]

    D., Clarke , B

    Twicken , J. D., Clarke , B. D., Bryson , S. T., et al. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7740, Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy, ed. N. M. Radziwill & A. Bridger , 774023, 10.1117/12.856790

    2010 doi

  72. [82]

    2023, , 671, A121, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245460

    Van Reeth , T., Johnston , C., Southworth , J., et al. 2023, , 671, A121, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245460

    2023 doi

  73. [83]

    L., Eisenhardt , P

    Wright , E. L., Eisenhardt , P. R. M., Mainzer , A. K., et al. 2010, , 140, 1868, 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868

    2010 doi

  74. [84]

    2023, , 264, 14, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac9dfa

    Zhang , R., & Yuan , H. 2023, , 264, 14, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac9dfa

    2023 doi

  75. [85]

    2024, , 528, 3378, 10.1093/mnras/stae010

    Zhang , V., Rappaport , S., Jayaraman , R., et al. 2024, , 528, 3378, 10.1093/mnras/stae010

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.