Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Dimers with layered disorder

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Layered random edge weights create essential singularity in dimer free energy

desk verdict Genuinely new rigorous results: layered disorder creates an essential singularity and a continuously varying critical exponent in the dimer model, with honest scope limits. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.11964 v1 pith:PCQ4NRPO submitted 2025-07-16 math.PR

Quentin Moulard , Fabio Toninelli (TU Wien) This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PR MSC 60B2060K3582B2082B44
keywords dimermodelquencheddisorderlayeredMcCoy-WuLyapunovexponentrandommatrixproductessentialsingularityPokrovsky-Talapov
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the dimer model on a square torus with random edge weights that are independent from row to row but constant within each row. It claims that even arbitrarily weak disorder of this layered type produces an essential singularity in the free energy at the origin of the phase diagram, a point where the homogeneous model's free energy is real analytic. At that point, dimer-dimer correlations decay like $e^{-\sqrt{y}}$ instead of the power-law decay of the clean liquid phase. The paper further claims that at the liquid-gas transition the Pokrovsky-Talapov exponent $3/2$ is modified by disorder into a continuously varying exponent between $3/2$ and infinity, while the $3/2$ exponent at the liquid-frozen boundary survives.

What carries the argument

The argument runs through Kasteleyn theory: both the free energy and the two-point correlation function are expressed in terms of the top Lyapunov exponent $L(\theta,H_2)$ of an i.i.d. product of $2\times2$ complex matrices $M^\theta_{H_2}(w_1,w_2)=\begin{pmatrix}2w_1\sin(\theta+iH_2)&w_2^2\\1&0\end{pmatrix}$. The free energy is $F=(1/\pi)\int_0^{\pi/2}\max(L(\theta,H_2),|H_1|)\,d\theta$. The load-bearing mechanism is the near-commutation of these matrices when $\theta\approx0$: the Lyapunov exponent $L(z)$ is harmonic in the right half-plane, monotone in $\mathrm{Re}(z)$, and behaves like $\mathrm{Var}(\log w_2)/\log(1/|z|)$ as $z\to0$; inserting this asymptotic into the $\theta$-integral produces the essential singularity. Rigorous sharp-asymptotic results for such almost-commuting random matrix products, of the Derrida-Hilhorst type, supply the exponents $\beta(\gamma)$.

What would settle it

On a large torus with layered i.i.d. weights and $H_1=H_2=0$, measure the correlation between two horizontal edges separated by $y$ rows: Theorem 1.14 predicts decay like $e^{-r\sqrt{y}}$ with $r>0$ random and typically bounded away from zero; observing power-law decay or simple exponential decay $e^{-cy}$ would refute the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that layered quenched disorder creates a genuine infinite-order singularity in a model that is otherwise smooth. Under Assumption 1 and with $H_2=0$, it proves that as $H_1\searrow 0$, $$F(H_1)-F(0)=\exp\Bigl(-(1+o(1))\,\mathrm{Var}(\log w_2)/H_1\Bigr),$$ an essential singularity at a point where the homogeneous dimer free energy is real analytic. The same disorder mechanism makes dimer-dimer correlations decay at that point like $e^{-r\sqrt{y}}$ in the direction perpendicular to the layering. When an alternating row factor $\gamma>1$ is added, the transition at $H_1=\log\gamma$ acquires exponent $\beta(\gamma)=\max(1+1/(2\alpha(\gamma)),3/2)$, with $\alpha(\gamma)$ the unique positive solution of $\gamma^{4\alpha}=\mathbb{E}[w_2^{2\alpha}]\,\mathbb{E}[w_2^{-2\alpha}]$, so the transition order varies continuously between $3/2$ and infinity. The paper also proves that the liquid-frozen boundary keeps the Pokrovsky-Talapov exponent $3/2$ and that the liquid phase's $1/(\mathrm{distance})^2$ correlation decay survives for $H_1\in(0,H_c)$.

Load-bearing premise

The theorems require the disorder to be layered (row-constant weights, independent across rows) and the graph to be a torus; if disorder were assigned independently to each edge, or the graph were a cylinder, the 2x2 transfer-matrix reduction would break down, and the paper only conjectures the same behavior for bulk disorder.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Arbitrarily weak layered disorder changes the character of the liquid phase at $H_1=H_2=0$: the free energy is no longer analytic, and the decay of correlations changes from $1/(\mathrm{distance})^2$ to stretched-exponential.
  • The gas-liquid transition of the $\gamma>1$ model has a continuously tunable order, interpolating between the clean Pokrovsky-Talapov exponent $3/2$ and an infinite-order transition as $\gamma\to1$.
  • The liquid-frozen boundary is robust: the $3/2$ Pokrovsky-Talapov law and the frozen phase itself survive disorder, with identically vanishing correlations in the frozen region.
  • For $H_1\in(0,H_c)$ in the liquid phase, dimer-dimer correlations still decay like $1/y^2$ with an oscillating prefactor, so the disordered model has a bona fide liquid phase despite the singularity at zero field.
  • The free energy develops regions $C_\pm$ where it is flat in $H_1$, a feature with no counterpart in the homogeneous phase diagram.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same phenomenology holds for bulk i.i.d. edge disorder as the paper conjectures, then the essential singularity and stretched-exponential decay would be generic signs of strong-disorder relevance in two-dimensional random tilings, not an artifact of row layering; a direct numerical test with fully independent edge weights is the obvious next step.
  • The variance of $\log w_2$ is the single disorder parameter controlling the leading singularity, which predicts a quantitative collapse: at leading exponential order, any two weight laws with the same variance should give the same $F(H_1)-F(0)$ as $H_1\to0$, a claim Monte Carlo or transfer-matrix data could verify.
  • Viewed as a one-dimensional disordered chain in the row index, the model suggests a localization interpretation: the random variable $r$ in the correlation bound should scale like the maximum of a Brownian motion, so the typical decay exponent is only weakly self-averaging; measuring $\log|\mathrm{Cov}|/\sqrt{y}$ across disorder samples would test this.
  • The free-energy singularity should be visible in limit shapes of volume-tilted dimer models with boundaries, as the paper anticipates; a practical check is whether the arctic curve develops a non-analytic point where the slope tends to zero.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the dimer model on the square lattice/torus with layered quenched random edge weights, in the spirit of the McCoy--Wu disordered Ising model. Using Kasteleyn theory, the authors express the free energy as an integral over Fourier modes of the top Lyapunov exponent of products of i.i.d. 2x2 random matrices (Proposition 1.2). Their main results are: (i) an essential singularity of the free energy at H1=0 with asymptotic exp(-(1+o(1)) Var(log w2)/H1) (Theorem 1.5); (ii) a positive gap Delta(H2) with asymptotic Var(log w2)/|log H2| (Theorem 1.7); (iii) persistence of the 3/2 Pokrovsky--Talapov exponent at the liquid/frozen transition (Theorem 1.9); (iv) a continuously variable exponent beta(gamma) at the gas--liquid transition (Theorem 1.11); and (v) stretched-exponential decay ~ exp(-r sqrt(y)) of dimer-dimer correlations at H1=0 while power-law decay persists in the liquid phase (Theorem 1.14). The proofs combine analytic properties of Lyapunov exponents with recent rigorous Derrida--Hilhorst type asymptotics.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a significant contribution to the rigorous understanding of disorder relevance in two-dimensional statistical mechanics. It provides a concrete dimer model where quenched disorder produces an essential singularity at a point where the homogeneous model is real-analytic, with the disorder strength entering through an explicit constant Var(log w2). The paper also exhibits a continuously varying critical exponent at the gas--liquid transition, interpolating between 3/2 and infinity. The transfer-matrix representation and the use of recent Lyapunov-exponent results are natural and powerful, and the proofs are detailed. The paper is careful in stating scope limitations: the results concern layered disorder on the torus, and the authors explicitly note that bulk disorder and cylinder boundary conditions change the picture (Remark 1.3, Section 1).

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 3, proof of Lemma 3.4] In the proof of subharmonicity of L, the text states that the approximating sequence is non-increasing by sub-additivity and therefore its limit is subharmonic. This monotonicity claim is not justified by subadditivity alone: for a subadditive sequence a_n, the normalized sequence a_n/n need not be monotone. Moreover, the displayed formula appears to have a typo (2^{-n} should presumably be 1/(2n) for the usual Lyapunov normalization). The monotonicity is used to pass subharmonicity to the limit and then to deduce continuity of L at 0, which is subsequently used in formula (1.8) and hence in Theorem 1.5. Please either supply a correct proof (for instance, prove continuity at 0 directly or invoke the general continuity result [4, Th. B] as already done in Remark 3.6) or justify the monotonicity claim with a valid argument.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Remark 1.13 and Section 5.7] In Remark 1.13 the sign condition on c_alpha is duplicated: it says 'c_alpha > 0 if alpha < 1/2 and c_alpha > 0 if alpha < 1/2'. The second condition should read 'c_alpha < 0 if alpha > 1/2', consistent with equation (5.46).
  2. [Section 5.7] The phrase 'See Section 5.7 for a the proof' contains a typo; it should be 'for a proof'.
  3. [Equations (4.28) and (4.30)] The notation in the inner products such as \langle M^\theta_0 \ldots, M^\theta_y V^\theta_{>y}, V^\theta_{<0}\rangle is awkward and could be misread; please place the product as a single argument, e.g., \langle M^\theta_0 \cdots M^\theta_y V^\theta_{>y}, V^\theta_{<0}\rangle.
  4. [Section 1.3, final paragraph] The statement that the 3/2 exponent at the liquid/frozen transition for gamma>1 'could also be proved' but is omitted is a formal claim without proof. Since it is outside the stated theorems, please label it explicitly as a remark or conjecture, or provide a proof sketch, so readers know its status.
  5. [Lemma 3.4 normalization] The normalization in the definition of L in the proof of Lemma 3.4 should be checked for consistency: the text writes 2^{-n} E log ||M_1...M_{2n}||, whereas the rest of the paper (e.g., Lemma 3.2) uses 1/(2n) normalization. If 2^{-n} is intentional, please clarify the definition of the Lyapunov exponent used there.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: central theorems are derived from Kasteleyn theory plus independent Lyapunov-exponent asymptotics, with no fitted parameters.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained within the stated layered-torus model. The free-energy formula (1.3) is obtained from the Kasteleyn determinant via (4.10)-(4.12), not assumed. Theorem 1.5 follows from (1.8) together with the asymptotic (3.6), which is proved in Lemma 3.4 by sandwiching the two-step matrix product between Derrida-Hilhorst-type matrices and invoking independent results [7, 11]; no free parameter is fitted to the free-energy data, and Var(log w2) emerges from the calculation. Theorem 1.11 similarly reduces to the external Theorem 5.1, with alpha(gamma) defined by the self-contained equation (1.18) rather than by the target asymptotic. The only self-citation, reference [34] by one of the authors, is explicitly described as a source of inspiration ('Some of the ideas we use in this work were developed by one of us in the latter reference'), and it is not load-bearing: the proofs rely on the paper's own lemmas and on independently established Lyapunov-exponent results. The stated limitations (layered disorder, torus boundary conditions, and the conjectural bulk-disorder case) are explicit scope caveats, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard Kasteleyn theory, Furstenberg's theorem, and recent rigorous results on Lyapunov exponents of random matrices; no new particles or ad hoc constants are introduced. The key domain assumptions are the layered i.i.d. structure and the torus boundary conditions.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Assumption 1: w1, w2 compactly supported on (0,∞), independent, w2 non-deterministic, E[log w2]=0.
    The entire model and all theorems depend on this. Non-degeneracy of w2 is essential for the singularity; if w2 were deterministic, F(H1)-F(0)=0. See Assumption 1, Section 1.1.
  • standard math E(log w2)=0 can be assumed WLOG by rescaling weights.
    Used to center the random walks and apply law of large numbers; stated in Assumption 1.
  • standard math Kasteleyn's theorem for the torus with four orientation matrices, including signs c(tau).
    Used in Section 4 to express Z_{L,N} as a combination of determinants; basis for all free energy and correlation formulas.
  • standard math Furstenberg's theorem on non-compact, irreducible random matrix products gives positive Lyapunov exponent.
    Used in Lemma 3.4 to prove positivity of L(z) on C\{0}; see Theorem 3.1.
  • standard math Derrida-Hilhorst asymptotics for Lyapunov exponents of matrices [[1, epsilon],[epsilon Z, Z]] are valid as stated in Theorem 5.1.
    Imported from [18], [23], and [11]; used in Section 5.6 to determine beta(gamma). These are external theorems with specific hypotheses (non-degenerate Z, E[log Z]<0, etc.).
  • domain assumption Limit order N→∞ then L→∞ defines F and is interchangeable with opposite order (Remark 1.3).
    The paper takes N first for technical simplicity; the equivalence is asserted but not fully proven. If the limits did not interchange, the thermodynamic limit might differ.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dimers with layered disorder." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PCQ4NRPO

@misc{pith2026250711964,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dimers with layered disorder},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PCQ4NRPO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.11964}
}
abstract

We study the dimer model on the square grid, with quenched random edge weights. Randomness is chosen to have a layered structure, similar to that of the celebrated McCoy-Wu disordered Ising model. Disorder has a highly non-trivial effect and it produces an essential singularity of the free energy, with $e^{-\sqrt{{\rm distance}}}$ decay of dimer-dimer correlations, at a point of the ``liquid'' (or ``massless'') phase where the homogeneous dimer model has instead a real analytic free energy and correlations decaying like $1/({\rm distance})^2$. Moreover, at a point where the homogeneous model has a transition between a massive (gaseous) and massless (liquid) phase, the critical exponent 3/2 (Pokrovsky-Talapov law), characteristic of the transition between the two regimes, is modified by disorder into an exponent that ranges continuously between 3/2 and infinity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.11964 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: The phase diagram of the non-disordered dimer model. The free energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: The phase diagram of the non-disordered dimer model with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quenched and Annealed CLTs for the one-periodic Aztec diamond in random environment

    math.PR 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Quenched height fluctuations in random-environment one-periodic Aztec diamonds converge almost surely to the Gaussian Free Field; annealed fluctuations are Gaussian with environment-dependent covariances.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [34]

    Q. Moulard. The infinite order phase transition of the McCoy-Wu model. in preparation

    work page

  2. [1]

    Exponential decay of correlations in the 2D random field Ising model

    M. Aizenman, M. Harel, and R. Peled. “Exponential decay of correlations in the 2D random field Ising model”. In: J. Stat. Phys. 180.1-6 (2020), pp. 304–331. doi: 10.1007/s10955- 019-02401-5

    doi:10.1007/s10955- 2020

  3. [2]

    Rounding effects of quenched randomness on first-order phase transitions

    M. Aizenman and J. Wehr. “Rounding effects of quenched randomness on first-order phase transitions”. In: Comm. Math. Phys. 130.3 (1990), pp. 489–528. url: http : //projecteuclid.org/euclid.cmp/1104200601

    work page arXiv 1990

  4. [3]

    Dimer models and conformal structures

    K. Astala, E. Duse, I. Prause, and X. Zhong. “Dimer models and conformal structures”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.02599 (2020)

    work page arXiv 2020

  5. [4]

    Continuity of the Lyapunov exponents of random matrix products

    A. Avila, A. Eskin, and M. Viana. “Continuity of the Lyapunov exponents of random matrix products”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.06009 (2023)

    arXiv 2023

  6. [5]

    Bougerol and J

    P. Bougerol and J. Lacroix.Products of random matrices with applications to Schr¨odinger op- erators. Vol. 8. Progress in Probability and Statistics. Birkh¨auser Boston, 1985, pp. xii+283. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-9172-2

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-9172-2 1985

  7. [6]

    Domino Tilings of the Aztec Diamond in Random Environment and Schur Generating Functions

    A. Bufetov, L. Petrov, and P. Zografos. “Domino Tilings of the Aztec Diamond in Random Environment and Schur Generating Functions”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.08560 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  8. [7]

    On the large interaction asymptotics of the free energy density of the Ising chain with disordered centered external field

    O. Collin. “On the large interaction asymptotics of the free energy density of the Ising chain with disordered centered external field”. In: ALEA, Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat. 22 (2025), pp. 799–814. doi: 10.30757/ALEA.v22-31

    work page doi:10.30757/alea.v22-31 2025

Show all 39 references
  1. [8]

    On the Lyapunov exponent for the random field Ising transfer matrix, in the critical case

    O. Collin, G. Giacomin, R. L. Greenblatt, and Y. Hu. “On the Lyapunov exponent for the random field Ising transfer matrix, in the critical case”. In: Ann. Henri Poincar´e (2025). doi: 10.1007/s00023-025-01589-5 . The non-disordered dimer model 41

    2025 doi

  2. [9]

    F. Comets. Directed polymers in random environments. Springer, 2017

    2017

  3. [10]

    Continuum limit of random matrix products in statistical mechanics of disordered systems

    F. Comets, G. Giacomin, and R. L. Greenblatt. “Continuum limit of random matrix products in statistical mechanics of disordered systems”. In: Comm. Math. Phys. 369 (2019), pp. 171–219

    2019

  4. [11]

    Scaling of the Lyapunov exponent at a balanced hyperbolic critical point

    J. De Moor, C. Sadel, and H. Schulz-Baldes. “Scaling of the Lyapunov exponent at a balanced hyperbolic critical point”. In:Ann. Henri Poincar´e (2025). doi: 10.1007/s00023- 025-01594-8

    2025 doi

  5. [12]

    Singular behaviour of certain infinite products of random 2× 2 matrices

    B. Derrida and H. J. Hilhorst. “Singular behaviour of certain infinite products of random 2× 2 matrices”. In: Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General16.12 (1983), p. 2641

    1983

  6. [13]

    Exponential decay of correlations in the two-dimensional random field Ising model

    J. Ding and J. Xia. “Exponential decay of correlations in the two-dimensional random field Ising model”. In: Invent. Math. 224.3 (2021), pp. 999–1045. doi: 10.1007/s00222-020- 01024-y

    2021 doi

  7. [14]

    Critical behaviour of the 2D Ising model with impurity bonds

    V. S. Dotsenko and V. S Dotsenko. “Critical behaviour of the 2D Ising model with impurity bonds”. In: Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 15.3 (1982), p. 495

    1982

  8. [15]

    Critical behaviour of the phase transition in the 2D Ising model with impurities

    V. S. Dotsenko and V. S. Dotsenko. “Critical behaviour of the phase transition in the 2D Ising model with impurities”. In: Advances in Physics 32.2 (1983), pp. 129–172

    1983

  9. [16]

    Noncommuting random products

    H. Furstenberg. “Noncommuting random products”. In: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 108 (1963), pp. 377–428. doi: 10.2307/1993589

    1963 doi

  10. [17]

    Random matrix products and measures on projective spaces

    H. Furstenberg and Y. Kifer. “Random matrix products and measures on projective spaces”. In: Israel J. Math. 46.1-2 (1983), pp. 12–32. doi: 10.1007/BF02760620

    1983 doi

  11. [18]

    Singular behavior of the leading Lyapunov exponent of a product of random 2 × 2 matrices

    G. Genovese, G. Giacomin, and R. L. Greenblatt. “Singular behavior of the leading Lyapunov exponent of a product of random 2 × 2 matrices”. In: Comm. Math. Phys. 351.3 (2017), pp. 923–958. doi: 10.1007/s00220-017-2855-4

    2017 doi

  12. [19]

    Pinning and disorder relevance for the lattice Gaussian Free Field

    G. Giacomin and H. Lacoin. “Pinning and disorder relevance for the lattice Gaussian Free Field”. In: J. Eur. Math. Soc. 20 (2018), 199–257. doi: 10.4171/JEMS/764

    2018 doi

  13. [20]

    Smoothing effect of quenched disorder on polymer depinning transitions

    G. Giacomin and F. Toninelli. “Smoothing effect of quenched disorder on polymer depinning transitions”. In: Comm. Math. Phys. 266 (2006), pp. 1–16

    2006

  14. [21]

    V. Gorin. Lectures on random lozenge tilings. Vol. 193. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2021, pp. viii+250. doi: 10.1017/ 9781108921183

    2021

  15. [22]

    Effect of random defects on the critical behaviour of Ising models

    A. B. Harris. “Effect of random defects on the critical behaviour of Ising models”. In: Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 7.9 (1974), p. 1671

    1974

  16. [23]

    Regular expansion for the characteristic exponent of a product of 2 × 2 random matrices

    B. Havret. “Regular expansion for the characteristic exponent of a product of 2 × 2 random matrices”. In: Math. Phys. Anal. Geom. 22.2 (2019), Paper No. 15, 30. doi: 10.1007/s11040-019-9312-x

    2019 doi

  17. [24]

    Random-field instability of the ordered state of continuous symmetry

    Y. Imry and S.-K. Ma. “Random-field instability of the ordered state of continuous symmetry”. In: Physical Review Letters 35.21 (1975), p. 1399

    1975

  18. [25]

    Jost.Compact Riemann surfaces

    J. Jost.Compact Riemann surfaces. An introduction to contemporary mathematics. Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 2006, pp. xviii+277.doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-33067-7 . The non-disordered dimer model 42

    2006 doi

  19. [26]

    The statistics of dimers on a lattice: I. The number of dimer arrangements on a quadratic lattice

    P. W. Kasteleyn. “The statistics of dimers on a lattice: I. The number of dimer arrangements on a quadratic lattice”. In: Physica 27.12 (1961), pp. 1209–1225

    1961

  20. [27]

    Dominos and the Gaussian free field

    R. Kenyon. “Dominos and the Gaussian free field”. In: Annals of probability 29 (2001), pp. 1128–1137

    2001

  21. [28]

    Limit shapes and the complex Burgers equation

    R. Kenyon and A. Okounkov. “Limit shapes and the complex Burgers equation”. In:Acta Math. 199.2 (2007), pp. 263–302

    2007

  22. [29]

    Dimers and amoebae

    R. Kenyon, A. Okounkov, and S. Sheffield. “Dimers and amoebae”. In:Ann. of Math. (2) 163.3 (2006), pp. 1019–1056. doi: 10.4007/annals.2006.163.1019

    2006 doi

  23. [30]

    Pinning and disorder relevance for the lattice Gaussian Free Field II: The two dimensional case

    H. Lacoin. “Pinning and disorder relevance for the lattice Gaussian Free Field II: The two dimensional case”. In: Annales scientifiques de l’ ´Ecole Normale Sup´erieure 52 (2019), pp. 1331–1401. doi: 10.24033/asens.2411

    2019 doi

  24. [31]

    The localization transition for the directed polymer in a random environment is smooth

    H. Lacoin. “The localization transition for the directed polymer in a random environment is smooth”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.13382 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  25. [32]

    B. M. McCoy and T. T. Wu.The two-dimensional Ising model. Harvard University Press, 1973

    1973

  26. [33]

    Theory of a two-dimensional Ising model with random impurities. I. Thermodynamics

    B. M. McCoy and T. T. Wu. “Theory of a two-dimensional Ising model with random impurities. I. Thermodynamics”. In: Physical Review 176.2 (1968), p. 631

    1968

  27. [35]

    Exactly soluble random field Ising models in one dimension

    T. M. Nieuwenhuizen and J. M. Luck. “Exactly soluble random field Ising models in one dimension”. In: Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 19.7 (1986), p. 1207. doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/19/7/022

    1986 doi

  28. [36]

    The theory of two-dimensional incommensurate crystals

    V.L. Pokrovskii and A.L. Talapov. “The theory of two-dimensional incommensurate crystals”. In: Sov. Phys. JETP 51 (1980), pp. 269–295

    1980

  29. [37]

    J. L. Schiff. Normal families. Universitext. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993, pp. xii+236. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0907-2

    1993 doi

  30. [38]

    Nearest-neighbor frustrated random-bond model in d=2: Some exact results

    R. Shankar and G. Murthy. “Nearest-neighbor frustrated random-bond model in d=2: Some exact results”. In:Phys. Rev. B36 (1987), pp. 536–545.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.36.536

    1987 doi

  31. [39]

    M. Viana. Lectures on Lyapunov exponents. Vol. 145. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014, pp. xiv+202. doi: 10.1017/ CBO9781139976602

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.