Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Studying the Variable Continuum and Emission Line Spectrum of 4U 1700-377 using NuSTAR's Stray Light

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-13 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Long quiet spells in 4U 1700-377 show a softer continuum without extra absorption, pointing to rarefied wind or a regime change.

desk verdict Solid NuSTAR stray-light expansion of 4U 1700-377 that cleanly quantifies two long low states and a careful CRSF non-detection; model dependence is real but already flagged by the authors. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.08876 v1 pith:PECOPNCE submitted 2026-07-09 astro-ph.HE

Colin J Bourque , McKinley C Brumback , Brian W Grefenstette , Douglas J K Buisson , Renee M Ludlam , Guglielmo Mastroserio , Steven Rossland This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords 4U1700-377high-massX-raybinaryNuSTARstraylightstellarwindaccretionFeK-alphafluorescencecyclotronresonantscatteringfeaturelow-fluxstatescontinuumvariability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

4U 1700-377 is a high-mass X-ray binary whose brightness jumps on hundred-second timescales because it accretes from a clumpy stellar wind. This paper expands the observational baseline by combining two focused NuSTAR pointings with five usable stray-light detections that together span seven years and multiple binary orbits. The focused data show excess emission above the iron K-alpha line, yet the exact line identification remains model-dependent; the stray-light spectra confirm ubiquitous iron fluorescence but lack the signal-to-noise needed for further lines, and they yield no conclusive cyclotron absorption feature. The central advance is the isolation of two sustained low-flux intervals lasting up to 60 ks. In those intervals luminosity drops by nearly an order of magnitude while the high-energy continuum softens, without a matching rise in absorbing column. The authors interpret this as either accretion from an extended rarefied stretch of wind or a temporary change in the dominant accretion regime near the compact object. The result matters because it links continuum shape directly to density structure in the wind and opens a longer-timescale window on how accretion behaves between the familiar short flares.

What carries the argument

NuSTAR stray-light spectra (combined with the two focused observations) that supply a multi-year baseline and allow isolation of the low-flux intervals; continuum models (primarily highecut and thcomp) used to track photon index, cutoff energies and column density across those states.

What would settle it

A high-resolution soft X-ray spectrum (for example with XRISM-Resolve) taken during a similarly long low-flux interval that either shows clear rarefied-wind fluorescence signatures matching the continuum softening, or reveals a stable cyclotron line whose parameters are independent of continuum choice.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In two extended low-flux intervals of up to 60 ks, the source luminosity falls by almost an order of magnitude and the high-energy continuum softens significantly, yet the absorbing column does not increase correspondingly. The authors argue that this continuum change is consistent with accretion from an extended rarefied interval of the companion's stellar wind or with a possible shift in the dominant accretion regime.

Load-bearing premise

That the chosen continuum models correctly separate the true spectral shape from residual emission or absorption features, so the reported softening and the non-detection of a cyclotron line are physical rather than model artifacts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Continuum shape during multi-tens-of-ks quiet periods can be used as a direct tracer of density structure in the stellar wind of wind-fed high-mass X-ray binaries.
  • Claims of a cyclotron resonant scattering feature in 4U 1700-377 remain unsupported once the multi-year stray-light baseline is included.
  • Fluorescent lines above iron K-alpha are variable and model-dependent, so higher-resolution spectroscopy is required before they can map large-scale accretion geometry.
  • The soft excess present in every observation is consistent with photo-ionized wind emission a few hundred kilometers from the compact object.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If rarefied-wind intervals of tens of ks are common, long-term monitoring of continuum hardness could map the clump size distribution of the companion wind without needing continuous high-cadence light curves.
  • Absence of a robust cyclotron line continues to leave open the possibility that the compact object is not a strongly magnetized neutron star, tightening the need for independent spin or mass measurements.
  • The same stray-light technique can be applied to other bright galactic-ridge sources to recover multi-year spectral baselines that focused observations alone cannot supply.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a multi-epoch spectral analysis of the wind-fed HMXB 4U 1700-377 using two focused NuSTAR observations plus five usable stray-light detections (total ~881 ks baseline). Continuum models (highecut, NPEX, thcomp, COMPMAG) are compared; Fe Kα is ubiquitous, excess emission above 6.4 keV is detected at >3σ but remains model-dependent, and no statistically required CRSF is found in either focused or stray-light spectra. The central new result is the characterization of two sustained low-flux intervals (up to ~60 ks) in which unabsorbed luminosity drops by a factor of ~6 and the high-energy continuum softens (higher photon index, higher kTe under thcomp) without a corresponding rise in NH, interpreted as accretion from a rarefied inter-clump wind or a possible change in accretion regime.

Significance. The work usefully expands the observational baseline for a highly variable source by exploiting the public StrayCats catalog and published nuskybgd pipelines, providing a transparent, multi-model view of continuum and line variability. The low-state result is observationally well-supported and, if confirmed, supplies a concrete example of how density structure in a clumpy stellar wind can modulate emission close to the compact object on tens-of-ks timescales. The careful treatment of background, dual-model checks, and explicit mapping of CRSF confidence intervals are strengths that make the data products reusable. The paper does not claim a definitive identification of the compact object or a unique physical model for the low states, which keeps the conclusions appropriately scoped.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.4 / Table 4] §3.4 and Table 4: for the stray-light low-state spectrum the exponential-cutoff parameters are frozen to the focused low-state values. While photon statistics are limited, the freeze assumes the two low states share the same continuum shape; a short sensitivity test (freezing only one parameter or reporting the free-fit upper limits) would strengthen the claim that the photon-index change is robust rather than imposed.
  2. [§3.4 / Figure 7] §3.4 / Figure 7: the highecut fit to the focused low-state spectrum is formally poor (χ² ≈ 388/292) with systematic negative residuals 10–20 keV. The authors correctly prefer thcomp and note that an unconstrained gabs does not improve the physical description, but a brief quantitative statement of how much the photon-index difference between flaring and low states changes when the residual is absorbed by a free gabs (or by allowing Efold free) would close the remaining model-dependence concern for the softening claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [global] Throughout: several residual draft artifacts remain (e.g., “V ariable”, “N)ST AR”, “lig tcurve”, “Co(nts”, “Ti e”, “da a -model”). A final proof-reading pass is needed.
  2. [Figure 1] Figure 1 caption and axis labels contain OCR-like corruption; the Swift/BAT light-curve units and the distinction between solid/dashed vertical lines should be cleaned for production.
  3. [Tables 2, A1] Table 2 and Table A1: the constant (FPMB) factor is reported with inconsistent precision; a uniform format (e.g., three decimal places) would aid comparison.
  4. [§2] §2: the choice of Kaastra & Bleeker (2016) binning is appropriate, but a one-sentence note that no minimum-counts cut was imposed (and that C-stat was used for the lowest-S/N stray-light spectra) would clarify the fitting statistics.
  5. [Appendix A] Appendix A figures: the extraction-region images (Fig. A1) and light curves (Fig. A2) are useful; adding the orbital-phase range of each filtered low-state interval directly on the light-curve panels would make the time selection fully self-contained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: observational spectral fitting of public NuSTAR data with free continuum parameters; claims do not reduce to inputs by construction.

full rationale

The paper is a standard multi-epoch spectral analysis of 4U 1700-377 using two focused and five usable stray-light NuSTAR observations. Continuum models (highecut, NPEX, thcomp, COMPMAG) are chosen for fit quality and consistency with prior literature; parameters (NH, photon index, Ecut, Efold, kTe, blackbody temperatures, line centroids) are free and reported with 90% uncertainties (Tables 2–4, A1). The central claim—two sustained low-flux intervals of ~40–60 ks in which luminosity drops by a factor of ~6 and the continuum softens without a corresponding rise in absorption—is obtained by time-filtering light curves (Fig. 6), extracting spectra, and refitting the same free models (Tables 3–4, Figs. 7–8). Softening appears under both highecut and thcomp; NH is consistent or lower in the low state. Emission-line and CRSF searches are likewise free-parameter tests (simftest, gabs grids) that return non-detections or model-dependent features, which the authors explicitly flag. Self-citations (StrayCats catalog, prior NuSTAR analyses of the same source, nuskybgd) supply data-reduction tools and context, not uniqueness theorems or closed-loop definitions that force the present results. No step equates a fitted quantity to a “prediction” by construction, and no load-bearing uniqueness is imported from overlapping authors. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external public data and free spectral fits.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Standard X-ray spectral analysis of a known HMXB; free parameters are the usual continuum and line normalizations fitted to each spectrum. Domain assumptions are the clumpy-wind accretion picture and the applicability of phenomenological/Comptonization models. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • NH, photon index, Ecut/Efold or kTe, blackbody kT and norm, Gaussian line energies/norms
    Standard free parameters of the continuum-plus-line models fitted independently to each observation or flux state (Tables 2–4, A1).
  • instrumental-lines background normalization
    Left free in stray-light fits because the source continuum reaches high energies (Section 2).
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Accretion is driven by a clumped stellar wind whose density variations produce the observed flares and low states (Bondi-Hoyle framework of Ducci et al. 2009).
    Invoked throughout Introduction and Discussion to interpret luminosity and continuum changes.
  • domain assumption Phenomenological cutoff power-law and thermal-Comptonization models adequately describe the continuum so that residuals can be attributed to lines or CRSFs.
    Section 3.1 selection of continuum models; acknowledged model dependence of features.
  • domain assumption nuskybgd correctly models the non-focused background components for stray-light extraction regions.
    Section 2 data-reduction pipeline.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Studying the Variable Continuum and Emission Line Spectrum of 4U 1700-377 using NuSTAR's Stray Light." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PECOPNCE

@misc{pith2026260708876,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Studying the Variable Continuum and Emission Line Spectrum of 4U 1700-377 using NuSTAR's Stray Light},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PECOPNCE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.08876}
}
abstract

The high-mass X-ray binary 4U 1700-377 shows strong variation in brightness on timescales of hundreds of seconds due to accretion from a highly clumped stellar wind from the companion. Using two focused observations and five stray light observations from NuSTAR, we are able to expand the baseline of observations of the source and track spectral parameters throughout the source's variability. The focused NuSTAR observations confidently detect excess emission lines at energies above Fe K$\alpha$, but are unable to universally constrain the nature of these lines independently of model choice. Strong Fe K$\alpha$ fluorescence is ubiquitous in the stray light data, but these observations lack sufficient signal-to-noise to further measure additional emission lines. We discuss the statistics of a claimed cyclotron resonant scattering feature as seen in the stray light spectra, but find no conclusive evidence for its existence. Finally, we investigate two instances of sustained low-flux states of up to 60 ks. When this occurs, luminosity can fall by almost an order of magnitude and the high-energy continuum softens significantly without corresponding to increased absorption. We discuss the manner in which the changing shape of the continuum during these intervals may show accretion during an extended rarefied interval of stellar wind, or a possible change of the dominant accretion regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08876 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Timeline of all NuSTAR observations of 4U 1700-377. The two focused observations are indicated by solid vertical red lines, and the stray light detections are marked by dashed black lines. lowing paper we present the analysis of 2 focused obser￾vations and 19 stray light observations of 4U 1700-377, discuss the consequences of our findings, and suggest next steps for making further insightful observations of this so… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Light curves from every stray light observation of 4U 1700-377 plotted against phase of the binary orbit. In total, the stray light detections span the entire orbit, and demonstrate the high variability of the source brightness over the timescale of individual observations. was performed (between 3 keV and the energy at which the background begins to dominate, which for stray light will be impacted by factors such a… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Selection of four continuum models which can be well-fit to the spectrum of 4U 1700-377. The top panel in each column shows the NuSTAR spectrum, model, and components; each panel below shows the ∆χ residuals for highecut, thcomp, NPEX, and COMPMAG continuum models. A highecut continuum model yields the best fit to observation 30101027002, and the second best fit for 30701023001; the more complicated COMPMAG offers a… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Best fit residuals and iron line profiles for focused NuSTAR observations 301010127002 (left) and 30701023001 (right). Top plots use pow as the continuum model; the bottom plots use thcomp. In all plots the top panels subplot shows ∆χ residuals of the best-fit model, a…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: 90% confidence intervals for a test absorption fea￾ture in the highecut continuum model, for both the focused (top) and stray light (bottom) observations. Open contours mean the gabs component is consistent with a strength of 0 keV. The contours shown here are generate…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Flaring and persistent spectra for focused observation 30101027002. Panels (a.i) and (b.i) show χ 2 residuals for the best fit thcomp model. Panels (a.ii) and (b.ii) are for a highecut model. Data points in black are from FPMA, red are from FPMB. In the low state, data…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2021, A&A, 648, A105, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039125

    Amato, R., Grinberg, V., Hell, N., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A105, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039125

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039125 2021

  2. [2]

    Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, 17

    1996

  3. [3]

    2018, AJ, 156, 58, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aacb21

    Mantelet, G., & Andrae, R. 2018, AJ, 156, 58, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aacb21

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aacb21 2018

  4. [4]

    2020, MNRAS, 493, 3045, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa437

    Bala, S., Roy, J., & Bhattacharya, D. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 3045, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa437

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa437 2020

  5. [5]

    D., Barbier, L

    Barthelmy, S. D., Barbier, L. M., Cummings, J. R., et al. 2005, SSRv, 120, 143, doi: 10.1007/s11214-005-5096-3

    doi:10.1007/s11214-005-5096-3 2005

  6. [6]

    A., & Wolff, M

    Becker, P. A., & Wolff, M. T. 2007, ApJ, 654, 435, doi: 10.1086/509108

    doi:10.1086/509108 2007

  7. [7]

    D., Kallman, T., & Corcoran, M

    Boroson, B., Vrtilek, S. D., Kallman, T., & Corcoran, M. 2003, ApJ, 592, 516, doi: 10.1086/375636

    work page doi:10.1086/375636 2003

  8. [8]

    A., Rothschild, R

    Coburn, W., Heindl, W. A., Rothschild, R. E., et al. 2002, ApJ, 580, 394, doi: 10.1086/343033

    doi:10.1086/343033 2002

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    F., Coe, M

    Dolan, J. F., Coe, M. J., Crannell, C. J., et al. 1980, ApJ, 238, 238, doi: 10.1086/157980

    1980 doi

  2. [10]

    2009, MNRAS, 398, 2152, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15265.x

    Ducci, L., Sidoli, L., Mereghetti, S., Paizis, A., & Romano, P. 2009, MNRAS, 398, 2152, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15265.x

    2009 doi

  3. [11]

    2015, A&A, 577, A130, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425191

    Falanga, M., Bozzo, E., Lutovinov, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 577, A130, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425191

    2015 doi

  4. [12]

    2012, A&A, 538, A67, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118008

    Farinelli, R., Ceccobello, C., Romano, P., & Titarchuk, L. 2012, A&A, 538, A67, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118008

    2012 doi

  5. [13]

    2011, A&A, 525, A102, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014808

    Farinelli, R., & Titarchuk, L. 2011, A&A, 525, A102, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014808

    2011 doi

  6. [14]

    Sunyaev, R. A. 2005, Astronomy Letters, 31, 729, doi: 10.1134/1.2123288 F¨ urst, F., Grefenstette, B. W., Staubert, R., et al. 2013, ApJ, 779, 69, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/69 Gim´ enez-Garc´ ıa, A., Torrej´ on, J. M., Eikmann, W., et al. 2015, A&A, 576, A108, doi: 10.1051/...

    2005 doi

  7. [15]

    P., & Blank, D

    Goldstein, G., Huenemoerder, D. P., & Blank, D. 2004, AJ, 127, 2310, doi: 10.1086/382514

    2004 doi

  8. [16]

    W., Ludlam, R

    Grefenstette, B. W., Ludlam, R. M., Thompson, E. T., et al. 2021, ApJ, 909, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe045

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    E., & Kallman, T

    Haberl, F., White, N. E., & Kallman, T. R. 1989, ApJ, 343, 409, doi: 10.1086/167714

    1989 doi

  10. [18]

    M., Torrej´ on, J

    Hainich, R., Oskinova, L. M., Torrej´ on, J. M., et al. 2020, A&A, 634, A49, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935498

    2020 doi

  11. [19]

    A., Craig, W

    Harrison, F. A., Craig, W. W., Christensen, F. E., et al. 2013, ApJ, 770, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/103

    2013 doi

  12. [20]

    B., Rothschild, R

    Hemphill, P. B., Rothschild, R. E., Cheatham, D. M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 62, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab03d3 HI4PI Collaboration, Ben Bekhti, N., Fl¨ oer, L., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A116, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629178

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    C., Narayan, R., & Kallman, T

    Hickox, R. C., Narayan, R., & Kallman, T. R. 2004, ApJ, 614, 881, doi: 10.1086/423928

    2004 doi

  14. [22]

    2016, MNRAS, 461, 816, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1299

    Islam, N., & Paul, B. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 816, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1299

    2016 doi

  15. [23]

    K., & Naik, S

    Jaisawal, G. K., & Naik, S. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 620, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv029

    2015 doi

  16. [24]

    1973, ApJL, 184, L65, doi: 10.1086/181289

    Jones, C., & Liller, W. 1973, ApJL, 184, L65, doi: 10.1086/181289

    1973 doi

  17. [25]

    S., & Bleeker, J

    Kaastra, J. S., & Bleeker, J. A. M. 2016, A&A, 587, A151, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527395

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    M., Buisson, D

    Li, S., Ludlam, R. M., Buisson, D. J. K., et al. 2025, ApJ, 994, 169, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae10bc

    2025 doi

  19. [27]

    M., Grefenstette, B

    Ludlam, R. M., Grefenstette, B. W., Brumback, M. C., et al. 2022, ApJ, 934, 59, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7b27 18

    2022 doi

  20. [28]

    K., Christensen, F

    Madsen, K. K., Christensen, F. E., Craig, W. W., et al. 2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1711.02719, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1711.02719

    2017 doi arXiv

  21. [29]

    K., Grefenstette, B

    Madsen, K. K., Grefenstette, B. W., Pike, S., et al. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2005.00569, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2005.00569

    2020 doi arXiv

  22. [30]

    1999, ApJ, 525, 978, doi: 10.1086/307912

    Makishima, K., Mihara, T., Nagase, F., & Tanaka, Y. 1999, ApJ, 525, 978, doi: 10.1086/307912

    1999 doi

  23. [31]

    M., Oskinova, L., et al

    Martinez-Chicharro, M., Torrej´ on, J. M., Oskinova, L., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 473, L74, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx165 Mart´ ınez-N´ u˜ nez, S., Torrej´ on, J. M., K¨ uhnel, M., et al. 2014, A&A, 563, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322404 Mart´ ınez-N´ u˜ nez, S., Kretschmar, P., B...

    2018 doi

  24. [32]

    W., Thalhammer, P., et al

    Mastroserio, G., Grefenstette, B. W., Thalhammer, P., et al. 2022, ApJ, 941, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8c94

    2022 doi

  25. [33]

    1995, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol

    Mihara, T., Makishima, K., & Nagase, F. 1995, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 187, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 104.03

    1995

  26. [34]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2204.14185, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2204.14185

    Mushtukov, A., & Tsygankov, S. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2204.14185, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2204.14185

    2022 doi arXiv

  27. [35]

    M., Feldmeier, A., & Kretschmar, P

    Oskinova, L. M., Feldmeier, A., & Kretschmar, P. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 2820, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20507.x

    2012 doi

  28. [36]

    1999, A&A, 349, 873, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9904349

    Segreto, A. 1999, A&A, 349, 873, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9904349

    1999 doi arXiv

  29. [37]

    Rikame, K., Paul, B., Sharma, R., Jithesh, V., & Paul, K. T. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 3360, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae739

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    2016, ApJ, 821, 23, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/23

    Seifina, E., Titarchuk, L., & Shaposhnikov, N. 2016, ApJ, 821, 23, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/23

    2016 doi

  31. [39]

    2019, A&A, 622, A61, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834479

    Staubert, R., Tr¨ umper, J., Kendziorra, E., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A61, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834479

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    1986, in IAU Colloquium 89: Radiation Hydrodynamics in Stars and Compact Objects, ed

    Tanaka, Y. 1986, in IAU Colloquium 89: Radiation Hydrodynamics in Stars and Compact Objects, ed. D. Mihalas & K.-H. A. Winkler, Vol. 255 (Springer,

    1986

  33. [41]

    Berlin, Heidelberg), 198, doi: 10.1007/3-540-16764-1 12

    doi

  34. [42]

    2021, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 7, 037001, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.7.3.037001

    Terada, Y., Holland, M., Loewenstein, M., et al. 2021, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 7, 037001, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.7.3.037001

    2021 doi

  35. [43]

    S., Lutovinov, A

    Tsygankov, S. S., Lutovinov, A. A., Doroshenko, V., et al. 2016, A&A, 593, A16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628236 van der Meer, A., Kaper, L., di Salvo, T., et al. 2005, A&A, 432, 999, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041288 van der Meij, V., Guo, D., Kaper, L., & Renzo, M. 2021, A&A, ...

    2016 doi

  36. [44]

    A., Saavedra, E

    West-Ocampo, L., Fogantini, F. A., Saavedra, E. A., et al. 2026, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 52, 100567, doi: 10.1016/j.jheap.2026.100567

    2026 doi

  37. [45]

    E., Swank, J

    White, N. E., Swank, J. H., & Holt, S. S. 1983, ApJ, 270, 711, doi: 10.1086/161162

    1983 doi

  38. [46]

    R., Hornstrup, A., Molendi, S., et al

    Wik, D. R., Hornstrup, A., Molendi, S., et al. 2014, ApJ, 792, 48, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/48

    2014 doi

  39. [47]

    2024, ApJ, 963, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1992

    Xiao, H., Ji, L., Zhang, P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1992

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    A., Szanecki, M., Poutanen, J., Gierli´ nski, M., & Biernacki, P

    Zdziarski, A. A., Szanecki, M., Poutanen, J., Gierli´ nski, M., & Biernacki, P. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 5234, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa159 19 APPENDIX A.PRODUCTS FOR THE STRAY LIGHT OBSERVATIONS We show products from all of the analyzed stray light observations. Figure A1 shows detect...

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.