Monotonicity of limit wave speed of periodic traveling wave solutions via Abelian integral

Chidella Srinivasa Rao; Krishna Patra

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Monotonicity of limit wave speed of periodic traveling wave solutions via Abelian integral

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For every positive integer n, the limit wave speed of periodic traveling waves of the perturbed generalized KdV equation is monotonically increasing, and at most one isolated periodic wave exists for each wave speed.

desk verdict A clean Abelian-integral proof with a real gap: no reconciliation with prior 'decreasing' c0(h) results for n=1..4, so the central claim is not yet settled. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18096 v1 pith:PENZ65DF submitted 2024-11-27 math.AP

Krishna Patra , Chidella Srinivasa Rao This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 34C0534C0734C0837G15

keywords perturbedgeneralizedKdVequationperiodictravelingwavelimitspeedAbelianintegralratiomonotonicitygeometricsingularperturbationtheorycycleuniqueness

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the perturbed generalized KdV equation $U_t+U^nU_x+U_{xxx}+\epsilon(U_{xx}+U_{xxxx})=0$ with $\epsilon>0$ small and $n$ any positive integer. It proves that the ratio of Abelian integrals $F_n(h)=A_n(h)/A_0(h)$ is strictly decreasing on the energy interval $(-n(n+1)^{2/n}/(2(n+2)),0)$, the interval swept out by periodic orbits of the unperturbed Hamiltonian system. This monotonicity is the engine behind two conclusions: the limit wave speed $c_0(h)$ is monotonically increasing on the same interval, and for each wave speed the original equation has at most one isolated periodic traveling wave. The result settles an open problem from [26] and proves a conjecture from [13], extending earlier case-by-case results to all $n$.

What carries the argument

The central object is the ratio of Abelian integrals $F_n(h)=A_n(h)/A_0(h)$, where $A_n(h)=\oint_{\Gamma_h} u^n y\,du$ and $A_0(h)=\oint_{\Gamma_h} y\,du$ over the periodic level curves $\Gamma_h$ of the unperturbed Hamiltonian system. The proof also uses the involution $\delta(u)$ defined implicitly by $\Phi(u)=\Phi(\delta(u))$, where $\Phi(u)=-u^2/2+u^{n+2}/((n+1)(n+2))$, and the function $T_n(u)$ built from the ratio of two integrals over the interval between $\delta(u)$ and $u$. Lemma 3.1 supplies the algebraic identity that makes the derivative of $T_n(u)$ visibly negative; an existing criterion then turns this negativity into monotonicity of $F_n(h)$.

What would settle it

For n=5, compute $F_5(h)$ numerically on a fine grid of $h$-values in $(-5\cdot 6^{2/5}/14,0)$; the claimed result requires strict decrease at every point, and any local increase would refute it. Equivalently, check the endpoint values: the theorem predicts $c_0(0)=(19)/(50)$ for $n=5$ and $c_0$ tending to $1/5$ at the left endpoint; a deviation from these values would show the monotonicity argument fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the monotonicity of the limit wave speed is controlled by a single ratio of Abelian integrals, $F_n(h)=A_n(h)/A_0(h)$, formed from the perturbation terms $u^n y$ and $y$ over the level curves $\Gamma_h: H(u,y)=h$ of the Hamiltonian $H=y^2/2-u^2/2+u^{n+2}/((n+1)(n+2))$. The paper proves that $F_n(h)$ is strictly decreasing for $h$ in the periodic annulus $(-n(n+1)^{2/n}/(2(n+2)),0)$. The key step is an algebraic identity, Lemma 3.1, that rewrites the numerator of a certain derivative as a sum of positive squares, giving $T_n'(u)<0$; a quoted monotonicity criterion for ratios of Abelian integrals then transfers this to $F_n'(h)<0$. Since a periodic wave exists only when $A_n(h)/A_0(h)=1+1/c_0(h)$, the decreasing $F_n$ makes $c_0(h)$ increasing, with endpoint limits $c_0(0)=(3n+4)/(2n^2+3n)$ and $c_0\to 1/n$ as $h$ approaches the left endpoint of the annulus.

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes the corrected sign convention in the quoted monotonicity theorem is the right one; if the sign is flipped, the limit wave speed would be decreasing rather than increasing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

At most one isolated periodic traveling wave exists for each wave speed when $u(x,t)>0$ or $u(x,t)<0$, for every positive integer $n$.
The limit wave speed obeys $1/n < c_0(h) < (3n+4)/(2n^2+3n)$ throughout the periodic annulus.
At the endpoints, $c_0(h)$ tends to $1/n$ near the center and to $(3n+4)/(2n^2+3n)$ near the homoclinic orbit.
Numerical continuation for $n=5$ shows a stable limit cycle and a monotonically increasing $c_0(h)$ curve, matching the theoretical interval.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial extension: the same proof strategy should work for other polynomial perturbations of the same Hamiltonian, because only the positivity of the sum-of-squares expression in Lemma 3.1 is used; any perturbation whose analogous numerator stays positive would inherit monotone $F_n$.
Editorial extension: the endpoint bounds $1/n < c_0(h) < (3n+4)/(2n^2+3n)$ are quantitative enough to be tested in numerical simulations of the full PDE for small $\epsilon$, and a violation would point to a failure of the slow-manifold reduction.
Editorial extension: for even $n$, the reflection symmetry gives one periodic annulus on each side of the saddle; the paper proves at most one limit cycle per side, but it does not rule out two coexisting periodic waves, one positive and one negative, for the same wave speed.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper proves that the ratio F_n(h)=A_n/A_0 is strictly decreasing on the periodic annulus for every positive integer n, and uses that to show the limit wave speed c0(h) is increasing. The algebraic identity in Lemma 3.1 is the genuinely new piece—it yields a compact proof of the monotonicity that previously had been checked only for n=1..4. The authors also give a simpler uniqueness proof via the Christopher–Li criterion. That is a real contribution.

But the paper has a conspicuous unresolved tension. The introduction cites prior work [1,2,11] showing c0(h) is decreasing for n=1,2,3,4. The present Theorem 3.6 says increasing. Since c0 = 1/(F_n - 1), a decreasing F_n forces an increasing c0, so the two claims cannot both hold under the same definition of c0. The paper never addresses this. Either the previous results used a different convention (which should be said explicitly), or there is a sign/coherence problem in one of the two lines. This is not a minor formatting issue; it is the load-bearing conclusion.

The proof of the monotonicity itself is algebraically coherent and the n=5 numerical figure supports the increasing direction. The reliance on Theorem B from Liu et al., whose statement had to be corrected in [25] for a sign, is a bit fragile—the authors adopt the correction without independent derivation. That is acceptable if the correction is right, but given the contradiction with the earlier literature, the readers need more assurance.

Also, Theorem 3.3 as stated claims the equation has at most one isolated periodic traveling wave, but the proof only gives at most one per wave speed c; the quantification should be made explicit. Lemma 3.4 quotes endpoint values from [26] without proof; that's a minor complaint since it is cited.

For all that, the core derivation is neat and the result, if the direction is sorted out, is a solid advance. The paper deserves a serious referee, but the referee should insist on a reconciliation with the existing decreasing results before it is accepted.

Recommendation: send it to review, with a request to fix the contradiction and the quantification.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the perturbed generalized KdV equation (1.3) and claims three results: (i) the ratio of Abelian integrals F_n(h)=A_n(h)/A_0(h) is strictly decreasing on the periodic annulus (-n(n+1)^(2/n)/(2(n+2)),0); (ii) consequently the limit wave speed c0(h) is monotonically increasing there, answering an open problem of Yan et al. and a conjecture of Ouyang et al.; (iii) equation (1.3) has at most one isolated periodic traveling wave for each wave speed. The monotonicity proof is algebraic, using the involution of the Hamiltonian level curves and a criterion of Liu et al. with a sign correction from Wei et al. The paper also gives an n=5 numerical example of a limit cycle and a plot of c0(h).

Significance. If the PDE-level reduction were correct, the paper would resolve a natural open problem for all n with a parameter-free computation: the proof of Conjecture 3.2 is explicit, the algebraic identities in Lemma 3.1 are checked in detail, and the numerical n=5 example is consistent with the claimed monotonicity of c0(h). The use of the ratio of Abelian integrals, rather than case-by-case arguments, is a methodological strength. However, the paper's central claims are not yet supported as written because the derivation of the reduced system (2.6) from the original PDE appears inconsistent, and the new 'increasing' conclusion directly contradicts the cited earlier 'decreasing' results for n=1..4 without any reconciling discussion.

major comments (4)

[Section 2, Eqs. (2.4)-(2.6)] The derivation of the reduced system is not self-consistent. Substituting U=c^{1/n}u and ξ=η√c (as stated) into (2.3) gives, after multiplying by c^{1-1/n}, -c^2 u + c^2 u^{n+1}/(n+1) + u_{ηη} + ε(c^{1/2}u_η + c^{-1/2}u_{ηηη})=0, not (2.4). If the intended scaling is ξ=η/√c, then (2.4) is recovered, but the third equation of the singular-perturbation system should contain ε/√c y rather than ε√c y. In either case the slow-manifold reduction to (2.6) does not follow from (2.5): from (2.5) one obtains y' = u - u^{n+1}/(n+1) - ε√c y (or, with the corrected scaling, -ε/√c y), whereas (2.6) contains +ε√c(u^n - 1 - 1/c)y. Because the Abelian integral (2.11) is computed from (2.6), the connection between the original PDE (1.3) and the monotonicity theorem is not established as written.
[Section 1 vs. Theorem 3.6] The introduction states that for n=1,2,3,4 the earlier works [1,2,11] proved c0(h) is decreasing, whereas Theorem 3.6 proves c0(h) is increasing for all n. Since c0(h)=1/(F_n(h)-1) by (3.18) and F_n(h) is decreasing, these statements cannot both hold with the same definition of c0(h) and the same parameter h. The paper does not reconcile this contradiction. The authors should either identify a different normalization or branch (e.g., u<0) in the earlier papers, or explain why the earlier 'decreasing' results do not apply; otherwise the claimed resolution of the open problem is not credible.
[Section 3, Theorem 3.3 and Remark] Theorem 3.3 asserts that (1.3) has at most one isolated periodic traveling wave for all positive integers n, but the proof only analyzes the periodic annulus around (\sqrt[n]{n+1},0), and the remark correctly limits the conclusion to 'when u(x,t)>0 or u(x,t)<0'. For even n there are two centers, (\pm\sqrt[n]{n+1},0), and by the symmetry of (2.6) a limit cycle around each center can coexist. Thus the global statement of Theorem 3.3 is stronger than what is proved; the theorem should be restated as 'at most one such wave in each component u>0 and u<0'.
[Section 3, Theorem B Remark and Lemma 3.4] The monotonicity direction of F_n(h) is inherited from Theorem B of Liu et al. [9] with a sign correction quoted from [25]. The manuscript gives only a terse remark about the corrected sign and does not state the full corrected theorem or map its variables to the system (2.12), so the reader cannot verify that the direction has been applied correctly. Similarly, the endpoint values used in (3.17)-(3.20) are quoted from Yan et al. [26] without proof. These external results are load-bearing for the c0(h) monotonicity claim, and the paper should state them precisely or provide self-contained derivations.

minor comments (6)

[Section 2, scaling line] The notation 'U = n√c u' is ambiguous; it should be written U = \sqrt[n]{c}\,u to avoid confusion.
[Lemma 3.4] The second displayed formula for J0(0) should be J_n(0); as printed, the two formulas for J0(0) are inconsistent.
[Eq. (3.9)] In the first line of (3.9), 'fn(u,w)' should read 'fn(u,v)' in both occurrences.
[Remark after Theorem 3.3] There is a duplicated word: 'there is at most one one limit cycle'; the same duplication appears in the conclusion ('when when').
[Section 4, numerical simulation] The phrase 'closely approximates a closed trajectory' is vague; a quantitative measure, such as the maximum gap after one period, would strengthen the numerical evidence for the limit cycle.
[Data Availability] The statement 'This document does not have any associated manuscript' appears to mean that there is no associated data and should be reworded accordingly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the monotonicity of F_n(h) and c0(h) is derived from external theorems and direct computation, not from the conclusions being proved.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. The paper reduces the perturbed KdV equation to the planar system (2.6) via geometric singular perturbation theory, forms the Abelian integral A(h) in (2.11), and observes that zeros of A(h) correspond to periodic waves through the Poincare-Pontryagin theorem and Theorem C of Christopher and Li. The central monotonicity claim for F_n(h)=A_n(h)/A_0(h) is proved in Conjecture 3.2 by a direct algebraic computation of T_n'(u)<0 in (3.13)-(3.14), followed by an application of Theorem B from Liu et al. The paper does not assume F_n to be monotone; it proves it. Theorem 3.6 then derives c0(h)=1/(F_n(h)-1) from the zero condition (3.18), so the monotonicity of c0 is a corollary of the proved monotonicity of F_n, not a restatement of an assumed input. The endpoint values in Lemma 3.4 and the smoothness of c0(h) in Lemma 3.5 are quoted from Yan et al., but these are external results with explicit statements and are not used to force the monotonicity direction. The authors' own previous paper [15] is cited only as general background on Abelian integrals and is not load-bearing for the main theorems. The numerical section chooses c so that A(h*) = 0 for illustration after computing the ratio; this is an example, not a fitted parameter disguised as a prediction. The sign-correction remark citing Wei et al. [25] concerns the correct statement of an external theorem; whether that correction is applied correctly is a correctness risk, not circularity. No step in the paper equates the claimed result to its own input by construction, and no self-citation chain carries the central argument. Therefore the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities are introduced; the analysis relies on standard reductions and known theorems.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Fenichel's geometric singular perturbation theory provides the slow manifold reduction used in Section 2.
Reduces the 3D system (2.5) to the planar system (2.6); standard but unproven here.
standard math Theorem B from Liu et al. [9] with sign correction from Wei et al. [25].
Used to infer monotonicity of F_n(h) from monotonicity of T_n(u); the correction is external and load-bearing.
domain assumption Endpoint values and smoothness of c0(h) from Yan et al. [26] (Lemma 3.4, 3.5).
Quoted without proof; used for bounds and the relation c0(h)=1/(F_n-1).
standard math Poincare-Pontryagin and Christopher-Li Theorem C.
Connects zeros of the Abelian integral to limit cycles.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Monotonicity of limit wave speed of periodic traveling wave solutions via Abelian integral." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PENZ65DF

@misc{pith2026241118096,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Monotonicity of limit wave speed of periodic traveling wave solutions via Abelian integral},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PENZ65DF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18096}
}

read the original abstract

In this article, we investigate monotonicity of limit wave speed of periodic traveling wave solutions for a perturbed generalized KdV equation via Abelian integral. We have answered an open problem outlined by Yan et al. (2014) and the conjecture proposed by Ouyang et al. (2022). Geometric singular perturbation theory allows for the reduction of a three-dimensional dynamical system to a near-Hamiltonian planar system. Furthermore, utilizing the monotonic behavior of the ratio of Abelian integrals, we develop a method to show the existence of at most one isolated periodic traveling wave which is much simpler proof than that in Yan et al.(2014). Finally, we present numerical simulations that perfectly match the theoretical outcomes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18096 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Phase portrait of the system (2.7) when n is even(n = 4). 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Plot of image of Φ and involution. Now Φ(u) = Φ(v) =⇒ − u 2 2 + u n+2 (n + 1)(n + 2) = − v 2 2 + v n+2 (n + 1)(n + 2) =⇒ u 2 − v 2 = 2 (n + 1)(n + 2)(u n+2 − v n+2). (3.3) Next Lemma is helpful to prove the conjecture. Lemma 3.1. Suppose that n is a positive integer. Then (u 2 − v 2 ) [ n−1 2 X ] i=0 (u n−2i − v n−2i ) 2 (uv) 2i = (u 2(n+1) − v 2(n+1)) − (n + 1)u n v n (u 2 − v 2 ). (3.4) Proof: Case 1: When n = 2k,… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Trajectory of system (2.6) for ϵ = 0.1, n = 5, c = 100000 388851 with initial condition (a) u = 0.1 and y = 0, (b) u = 0.49885 and y = 0, (c) u = 0.9 and y = 0. When n = 5, and ϵ → 0, the theoretical results indicate that c0(h) is increasing over the interval − 5 √5 …

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Graphical representation of the limit wave speed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Monotonicity of the periodic waves for the perturbed generalized defocusing mKdV equation
math.AP 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

For every positive integer n, the limit speed of periodic waves in the perturbed defocusing mKdV equation increases with energy h and tends to 1 as h tends to 0.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[25]

M. Wei, Y. Dai, R. Zou, Arbitrarily High-Order Nonlinearity and Dif- ferent Distributed Delays, Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst. 24 (2025) 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12346-024-01179-6

work page doi:10.1007/s12346-024-01179-6 2025
[26]

W. Yan, Z. Liu, Y. Liang, Existence of Solitary Waves and Periodic Waves to a Perturbed Generalized KdV Equation, Math. Model. Anal. 19(4) (2014) 537-555

work page 2014
[9]

C. Liu, G. Chen, Z. Sun, New criteria for the monotonicity of the ratio of two Abelian integrals, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 465(1) (2018) 220-234

work page 2018
[1]

A. Chen, C. Zhang, W. Huang, Monotonicity of limit wave speed of traveling wave solutions for a perturbed generalized KdV equation, Appl. Math. Lett. 121 (2021) 107381

work page 2021
[2]

A. Chen, C. Zhang, W. Huang, Limit speed of traveling wave solutions for the per- turbed generalized KdV equation, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 16(3&4) (2023) 379-402

work page 2023
[3]

Christopher, C

C. Christopher, C. Li, Limit cycles of differential equations. Birkhauser Verlag, Berlin, 2007

work page 2007
[4]

Comment on ‘A new mathematical approach for finding the solitary waves in dusty plasma

G. Das, J. Sarma, Response to “Comment on ‘A new mathematical approach for finding the solitary waves in dusty plasma”’[Phys. Plasmas 6, 4392 (1999)], Phys. Plasmas 6 (11) (1999) 4394–4397

work page 1999
[5]

Derks, S

G. Derks, S. van Gils, On the uniqueness of traveling waves in perturbed Korteweg-de Vries equations, Jpn. J. Ind. Appl. Math. 10(3) (1993) 413–430

work page 1993

Show all 29 references

[6]

F. Fan, M. Wei, Traveling waves in a quintic BBM equation under both distributed delay and weak backward diffusion, Phys. D 458 (2024) 133995

2024
[7]

Fenichel, Geometric singular perturbation theory for ordinary differential equa- tions, J

N. Fenichel, Geometric singular perturbation theory for ordinary differential equa- tions, J. Differ. Equ. 31 (1979) 53–98

1979
[8]

J. K. Hale, Ordinary Differential Equations, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1969

1969
[10]

W. Liu, M. Han, Bifurcations of traveling wave solutions of a generalized Burgers- Fisher equation, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 533(2) (2024) 128012

2024
[11]

Ogawa, Travelling wave solutions to a perturbed Korteweg-de Vries equation, Hiroshima Math

T. Ogawa, Travelling wave solutions to a perturbed Korteweg-de Vries equation, Hiroshima Math. J. 24(2) (1994) 401–422

1994
[12]

Ostrovsky, Y

L. Ostrovsky, Y. A. Stepanyants, Do internal solitions exist in the ocean, Rev. Geo- phys. 27 (3) (1989) 293–310

1989
[13]

Ouyang, W

Z. Ouyang, W. Huang, M. Wei, Existence and uniqueness of periodic and solitary waves for a perturbed generalized KdV equation, J. Math. 2022(1) (2022) 5488473

2022
[14]

A. M. Ozorio de Almeida, Hamiltonian Systems: Chaos and Quantization, Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1988. 20

1988
[15]

Patra, Ch

K. Patra, Ch. S. Rao, Isolated periodic traveling waves of some re- action convection diffusion equations, Stud Appl Math. 2024;e12729. https://doi.org/10.1111/sapm.12729

2024 doi
[16]

Poincar´ e, Sur le probleme des trois corps et les ´ equations de la dynamique, Acta Math

H. Poincar´ e, Sur le probleme des trois corps et les ´ equations de la dynamique, Acta Math. XIII (1890), 1–270
[17]

Pontryagin, On dynamical systems close to hamiltonian ones, Zh Exp Theor Phys

L. Pontryagin, On dynamical systems close to hamiltonian ones, Zh Exp Theor Phys. 4 (1934) 234–238

1934
[18]

Seadawy, The solutions of the Boussinesq and generalized fifth-order KdV equa- tions by using the direct algebraic method, Appl

A. Seadawy, The solutions of the Boussinesq and generalized fifth-order KdV equa- tions by using the direct algebraic method, Appl. Math. Sci. 6 (82) (2012) 4081–4090

2012
[19]

X. Sun, W. Huang, J. Cai, Coexistence of the solitary and periodic waves in convect- ing shallow water fluid, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 53 (2020) 103067

2020
[20]

X. Sun, P. Yu, B. Qin, Global existence and uniqueness of periodic waves in a popu- lation model with density-dependent migrations and Allee effect, Internat. J. Bifur. Chaos Appl. Sci. Engrg. 27(12) (2017) 1750192

2017
[21]

B. Tian, G. M. Wei, C. Y. Zhang, W. R. Shan, Y. T. Gao, Transformations for a generalized variable-coefficient Korteweg–de Vries model from blood vessels, Bose–Einstein condensates, rods and positons with symbolic computation, Phys. Lett. A 356 (1) (2006) 8–16

2006
[22]

Q. Wang, W. Huang, P. Yu, Isolated periodic wave solutions arising from Hopf and Poincar´ e bifurcations in a class of single species model, J. Differ. Equ. 311 (2022) 59-80

2022
[23]

M. Wei, X. Chen, Near-Ordinary Periodic Waves of a Generalized Reac- tion–Convection–Diffusion Equation, Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst. 22(3) (2023) 107

2023
[24]

M. Wei, X. Chen, Y. Dai, Periodic wave solutions for a generalized reac- tion–convection–diffusion equation of high-order, Appl. Math. Lett. 158 (2024) 109249

2024
[27]

Y. Zeng, X. Sun, P. Yu, Dynamical analysis on traveling wave of a reaction–diffusion model, Appl. Math. Lett. 109 (2020) 106550. 21

2020
[28]

Zhang, Y

H. Zhang, Y. Xia, P. R. N’gbo, Global existence and uniqueness of a periodic wave solution of the generalized Burgers-Fisher equation, Appl. Math. Lett. 121 (2021) 107353

2021
[29]

Zoladek, R

H. Zoladek, R. Murillo, Qualitative Theory of ODEs: An Introduction to Dynamical Systems Theory. World Scientific, Singapore; 2023. 22

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [25]

M. Wei, Y. Dai, R. Zou, Arbitrarily High-Order Nonlinearity and Dif- ferent Distributed Delays, Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst. 24 (2025) 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12346-024-01179-6

work page doi:10.1007/s12346-024-01179-6 2025

[2] [26]

W. Yan, Z. Liu, Y. Liang, Existence of Solitary Waves and Periodic Waves to a Perturbed Generalized KdV Equation, Math. Model. Anal. 19(4) (2014) 537-555

work page 2014

[3] [9]

C. Liu, G. Chen, Z. Sun, New criteria for the monotonicity of the ratio of two Abelian integrals, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 465(1) (2018) 220-234

work page 2018

[4] [1]

A. Chen, C. Zhang, W. Huang, Monotonicity of limit wave speed of traveling wave solutions for a perturbed generalized KdV equation, Appl. Math. Lett. 121 (2021) 107381

work page 2021

[5] [2]

A. Chen, C. Zhang, W. Huang, Limit speed of traveling wave solutions for the per- turbed generalized KdV equation, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 16(3&4) (2023) 379-402

work page 2023

[6] [3]

Christopher, C

C. Christopher, C. Li, Limit cycles of differential equations. Birkhauser Verlag, Berlin, 2007

work page 2007

[7] [4]

Comment on ‘A new mathematical approach for finding the solitary waves in dusty plasma

G. Das, J. Sarma, Response to “Comment on ‘A new mathematical approach for finding the solitary waves in dusty plasma”’[Phys. Plasmas 6, 4392 (1999)], Phys. Plasmas 6 (11) (1999) 4394–4397

work page 1999

[8] [5]

Derks, S

G. Derks, S. van Gils, On the uniqueness of traveling waves in perturbed Korteweg-de Vries equations, Jpn. J. Ind. Appl. Math. 10(3) (1993) 413–430

work page 1993