Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The geometry of learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1605.00591 v3 pith:PEZLOATP submitted 2016-05-02 q-bio.QM cs.NE

classification q-bio.QMcs.NE
keywords fractalconditioningfractalscorrespondencedimensionexamplesgeometrylearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We establish a correspondence between Pavlovian conditioning processes and fractals. The association strength at a training trial corresponds to a point in a disconnected set at a given iteration level. In this way, one can represent a training process as a hopping on a fractal set, instead of the traditional learning curve as a function of the trial. The main advantage of this novel perspective is to provide an elegant classification of associative theories in terms of the geometric features of fractal sets. In particular, the dimension of fractals can measure the efficiency of conditioning models. We illustrate the correspondence with the examples of the Hull, Rescorla-Wagner, and Mackintosh models and show that they are equivalent to a Cantor set. More generally, conditioning programs are described by the geometry of their associated fractal, which gives much more information than just its dimension. We show this in several examples of random fractals and also comment on a possible relation between our formalism and other "fractal" findings in the cognitive literature.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools