pith. sign in

arxiv: 2105.13540 · v1 · pith:PGHSPORGnew · submitted 2021-05-28 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Galaxy clustering and systematics treatment for lens galaxy samples

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords galaxyclusteringsamplesamplesmeasurementssigmaanalysisartificial
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this work we present the galaxy clustering measurements of the two DES lens galaxy samples: a magnitude-limited sample optimized for the measurement of cosmological parameters, MagLim, and a sample of luminous red galaxies selected with the redMaGiC algorithm. MagLim / redMaGiC sample contains over 10 million / 2.5 million galaxies and is divided into six / five photometric redshift bins spanning the range $z\in[0.20,1.05]$ / $z\in[0.15,0.90]$. Both samples cover 4143 deg$^2$ over which we perform our analysis blind, measuring the angular correlation function with a S/N $\sim 63$ for both samples. In a companion paper (DES Collaboration et al. 2021)), these measurements of galaxy clustering are combined with the correlation functions of cosmic shear and galaxy-galaxy lensing of each sample to place cosmological constraints with a 3$\times$2pt analysis. We conduct a thorough study of the mitigation of systematic effects caused by the spatially varying survey properties and we correct the measurements to remove artificial clustering signals. We employ several decontamination methods with different configurations to ensure the robustness of our corrections and to determine the systematic uncertainty that needs to be considered for the final cosmology analyses. We validate our fiducial methodology using log-normal mocks, showing that our decontamination procedure induces biases no greater than $0.5\sigma$ in the $(\Omega_m, b)$ plane, where $b$ is galaxy bias. We demonstrate that failure to remove the artificial clustering would introduce strong biases up to $\sim 7 \sigma$ in $\Omega_m$ and of more than $4 \sigma$ in galaxy bias.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Density-Shear Baryon Acoustic Oscillation as a Cosmological Consistency Check

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GI BAO provides a robust consistency check for density BAO and shear data, with the first photometric measurement on DES Y3 showing agreement at α = 0.966 ± 0.252.

  2. Density-Shear Baryon Acoustic Oscillation as a Cosmological Consistency Check

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    First GI BAO measurement from DES Y3 photometric data yields α = 0.966 ± 0.252, consistent with density BAO α = 0.966 ± 0.037 at 0.86σ detection.

  3. AKRA 3.0: A matrix-free Inversion Framework for Weak Lensing Mass Mapping and Its Application to DES Y3 Data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    AKRA 3.0 uses conjugate gradient to solve the normal equations for weak lensing mass mapping, producing the highest-resolution DES Y3 convergence map to date and demonstrating unbiased power spectra extracted directly...

  4. Taming Additive Systematics via Redshift-Bin-Optimized Star-Galaxy Separation

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Redshift-bin-optimized color cuts using unWISE photometry reduce stellar contamination in the DES Y3 MagLim lens sample by 1.3-5.5% varying across bins and footprint.