Random attractors for locally monotone stochastic partial differential equations

Andre Schenke; Benjamin Gess; Wei Liu

Random attractors for locally monotone stochastic partial differential equations

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Random attractors exist for a broad class of locally monotone SPDE driven by additive Lévy noise.

desk verdict A genuinely general random attractor theorem for locally monotone SPDE with additive Lévy noise; the main argument holds up, and the flaws are minor. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03539 v1 pith:PIFIBEMO submitted 2019-08-09 math.PR math.APmath.DS

Benjamin Gess , Wei Liu , Andre Schenke This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.PRmath.APmath.DS MSC 37L5560H1535Q3547H0535G31

keywords randomattractorsdynamicalsystemslocallymonotoneSPDELévynoiseNavier-StokesequationsBurgersequationCahn-Hilliardstochasticp-Laplace

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that random attractors exist for a large class of stochastic partial differential equations whose drift is only locally monotone, not globally monotone, when the noise is additive and of trace-class Lévy type. Local monotonicity means the one-sided Lipschitz estimate may degrade by factors $\eta(v_1)+\rho(v_2)$ that are locally bounded in the solution norm, which is exactly the flexibility needed to include convection terms such as those in Burgers and 2D Navier-Stokes equations. The proof constructs a random dynamical system by subtracting a strictly stationary Ornstein-Uhlenbeck-type process built from a strongly monotone part of the drift, then uses compactness of the embedding $V \subseteq H$ to upgrade bounded absorption to a compact absorbing set. The result turns many previously case-by-case attractor proofs into corollaries of one abstract theorem.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the stationary conjugation map $T(t,\omega)y = y - u_t(\omega)$, where $u_t$ is the strictly stationary solution of the strongly monotone auxiliary equation $du_t = \sigma M(u_t)dt + dN_t$ built from a strongly monotone part $M$ of the drift $A$. Conjugating by $T$ turns the stochastic equation into a pathwise random PDE with coefficients $A_\omega(t,v) = A(v+u_t) - \sigma M(u_t)$; the assumptions (V) and (4.5) are exactly what make these random coefficients satisfy the local monotonicity, coercivity and growth hypotheses (H1)-(H4) of the deterministic well-posedness theory. Compactness of the embedding $V \subseteq H$ then makes the cocycle compact, so after establishing a random bounded absorbing set the standard random attractor criterion applies.

What would settle it

Take a locally monotone equation with $\alpha = 2$ and tune the linear term so that $K$ reaches $\gamma\lambda/4$, the boundary excluded in Theorem 5.1, and compute whether the pullback bound (5.2) still stays finite; if absorption still holds, the condition is not sharp, and if it fails, the threshold is necessary. Alternatively, for a candidate strongly monotone $M$, check whether the auxiliary stationary process $u_t$ really lies in $L^\alpha_{\mathrm{loc}}(\mathbb{R}; V)$ and is exponentially integrable in the sense of Theorem 3.1; a Lévy noise with finite fourth moments that violates this would break the conjugation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 5.1: under assumptions (A1)-(A5), (V) and the structural inequality (4.5), the continuous cocycle $S$ generated by $dX_t = A(X_t)dt + dN_t$ is compact, and when $\alpha = 2$ one additionally needs $K < \gamma\lambda/4$ in the coercivity estimate; then there is a random $\mathcal{D}$-attractor. The conditions are satisfied by stochastic Burgers type equations, stochastic 2D Navier-Stokes equations, the 3D Leray-$\alpha$ model, power law fluids, the Ladyzhenskaya model, Cahn-Hilliard type equations, Kuramoto-Sivashinsky type equations, porous media equations and $p$-Laplace equations, all driven by additive trace-class Lévy noise with finite fourth moments. In particular, the noise is only required to take values in the Hilbert space $H$, not in the domain of the drift operator, because the auxiliary stationary process supplies the missing spatial regularity.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the drift splits as a strongly monotone part $M$ plus a perturbation, with the strictly stationary process $u_t$ from $du_t = \sigma M(u_t)dt + dN_t$ living in $V$ and obeying the growth bounds of (4.5); if no such $M$ exists, the conjugation that removes the noise fails and the whole attractor argument collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Stochastic Burgers, 2D Navier-Stokes, 3D Leray-$\alpha$, power law fluid, Ladyzhenskaya, Cahn-Hilliard, Kuramoto-Sivashinsky, porous media and $p$-Laplace equations each admit a continuous random dynamical system and a random attractor under additive trace-class Lévy noise with finite fourth moments.
The noise only needs to take values in $H$, not in the domain of $A$, because the stationary process $u_t$ supplies the missing regularity.
Previously known random attractor results for monotone SPDE are recovered and extended to the locally monotone class.
For $\alpha = 2$, the smallness condition $K < \gamma\lambda/4$ on the linear part is the price for bounded absorption; in examples where $K = 0$ the condition is automatic.
The compact-cocycle argument avoids higher regularity assumptions on the noise that earlier attractor proofs needed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The stationary conjugation scheme is not tied to additive Lévy noise in an essential way: any noise that can be absorbed into a strictly stationary $V$-valued process for a strongly monotone $M$ should fit the same template.
The structural condition (4.5) and the restriction $\beta(\alpha-1) \le 2$ suggest the framework will not reach reaction terms of higher polynomial growth, such as the classical cubic double-well Cahn-Hilliard potential; a different route would be needed there.
The theorem leaves open whether the same attractor exists in the energy space $V$; the proof deliberately stops at compactness of the embedding, so regularity of the attractor is not addressed.
One testable extension is to let the Lévy measure have only finite second moments; the current proof uses moments up to order four, so weakening (N) would widen the class of admissible noises.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this is the real thing. It supplies a single abstract theorem that yields random attractors for locally monotone SPDE with additive trace-class Lévy noise, and the applications include models not covered before, notably the 3D Leray-alpha model and Cahn-Hilliard type equations. The paper does not fold the hard part into a citation: the stationary OU-type conjugation is constructed in Theorem 3.1, the random PDE estimates are in Section 4, and the examples verify the abstract hypotheses in detail. That is a lot of honest work.

What is new: previous random attractor results for this variational framework were largely for monotone operators or for noise more regular than H-valued Lévy noise. Here the local monotonicity from Liu–Röckner and the Lévy well-posedness from Brzeźniak–Liu–Zhu are combined with the stationary conjugation idea of Gess. The structural assumption (V)—that the drift has a strongly monotone part M—is explicit, and each example names an M. The additional smallness condition on K in (A3) when α=2 is also stated clearly. Given how many examples are worked (Burgers, 2D NSE, Leray-alpha, power law fluids, Ladyzhenskaya, Cahn-Hilliard, Kuramoto-Sivashinsky, porous media, p-Laplace), this is a useful unification, not just a theorem for one equation.

The soft spots are genuine but minor. First, Theorem 3.1(vi)–(vii) assert Cesàro convergence and sublinear growth of ||u_t||_H^p for every p∈N, while Assumption (N) only supplies Lévy moments through order four. For p>4 those claims need moments that are not there; they are not used in the attractor proof, so this is an overstatement, not a load-bearing flaw. Second, in Theorem 5.1(ii), K(ω) is an image of a bounded set under a compact map; that is relatively compact, not necessarily closed. Taking the closure would make it a compact absorbing set. Minor fix. Third, compactness in Theorem 5.1(i) is delegated to [35, Theorem 3.1]; the paper is not fully self-contained at that point, but the cited mechanism is standard for this framework.

The citation pattern is heavy on the authors' own prior work, but those citations are used as tools—well-posedness for locally monotone SPDE, the conjugation idea—rather than as a way to avoid proving the new claim. The construction of u_t and the conjugated random PDE are in the paper.

Who this is for: anybody working on long-time behavior of SPDE, especially fluid and phase-field models with jumps. It deserves a serious referee. I would send it out, expecting minor revision.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a general framework for the long-time behavior of locally monotone stochastic partial differential equations driven by additive trace-class Lévy noise. On a Gelfand triple V ⊂ H ⊂ V*, the authors impose structural conditions (A1)–(A5) on the drift A, assumption (V) that A has a strongly monotone part M, and condition (4.5) on the local-monotonicity functions η and ρ. Theorem 3.1 constructs a strictly stationary Ornstein–Uhlenbeck-type process u_t solving du_t = σM(u_t)dt + dN_t by taking limits as the initial time tends to -∞. This process is used in Section 4 to conjugate the original SPDE into a pathwise random PDE, for which the variational well-posedness theorem from Appendix A is verified. The resulting stochastic flow S is proved to be a continuous cocycle (Theorem 4.1), and Theorem 5.1 proves compactness and, under the additional condition K < γλ/4 when α = 2, existence of a random D-attractor. The abstract conditions are verified on a broad list of examples, including Burgers-type equations, 2D Navier–Stokes, the 3D Leray-α model, power-law fluids, the Ladyzhenskaya model, Cahn–Hilliard-type equations, Kuramoto–Sivashinsky-type equations, and previously studied monotone SPDE.

Significance. If the results are correct, this is a substantial contribution to the random-attractor literature. It unifies many case-by-case results by providing an abstract attractor theorem for locally monotone SPDE, going beyond the earlier monotone-operator frameworks of [34, 37] and covering fluid-dynamics-type nonlinearities. A particular strength is that the paper states all hypotheses explicitly and then checks them in detail for each application, including the nontrivial interpolation estimates in the fluid examples. The stationary Ornstein–Uhlenbeck-type construction under Lévy noise with only fourth-order moments is also of independent interest. The main theorem is conditional on the clearly stated hypotheses (V) and (4.5), which are verified in every example; this is a properly scoped conditional result rather than a hidden assumption. I did not identify a load-bearing flaw in the central derivation.

minor comments (4)

[Section 3, Theorem 3.1(vi)–(vii)] Parts (vi) and (vii) assert Cesàro convergence and sublinear growth of ‖u_t‖_H^p for every p ∈ ℕ, but Assumption (N) only provides Lévy moments up to order 4 and the p-th-moment Itô estimates in the proof are only closed for p ≤ 4. For p > 4, E‖u_t‖_H^p need not be finite without additional moment assumptions. This is a local overstatement: the attractor argument uses only the p = 2 and p = 4 cases through estimate (3.4), so the unbounded range p > 4 is not needed. Please restrict (vi)–(vii) to 2 ≤ p ≤ 4 or strengthen (N) accordingly.
[Section 5, proof of Theorem 5.1(i)] The compactness of the cocycle S is asserted by reference to [35, Theorem 3.1] without further detail. Since compactness is a key step in the attractor proof, a short indication of why compactness transfers through the stationary conjugation T would improve self-containedness, even if the cited argument is standard in this variational framework.
[Section 1, informal statement of Theorem 5.1] The introductory theorem statement omits the extra condition K < γλ/4 for α = 2 that appears in the formal statement of Theorem 5.1. Please align the informal statement with the formal theorem.
[Section 6.5, Example 6.9] The displayed formula for the critical exponent p_c is typeset in a way that is hard to read; please clarify the expression so that the numerical range claimed in the example is unambiguous.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 5.1 follows from explicit assumptions via the stationary conjugation constructed in the paper; self-citations are used as technical tools, not as inputs that define the conclusion.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The paper assumes (A1)-(A5), (V), and (4.5), constructs a strictly stationary process u_t from the strongly monotone operator M in Theorem 3.1, defines the random PDE coefficients A_omega via u_t, proves in Theorem 4.1 that these coefficients satisfy (H1)-(H4), and then obtains bounded absorption and compactness in Theorem 5.1. Nowhere is the target random attractor used as an assumption or fitted input. The auxiliary process u_t is not defined in terms of the attractor; it is obtained by letting the initial time tend to -infinity for the strongly monotone equation (3.2), which is an independent construction. Self-citations [34], [35], [37], [61], and [62] are invoked for standard technical ingredients: the stationary OU-type construction in the Wiener case, a compactness argument, well-posedness for locally monotone SPDE, and growth estimates. These are prior, parameter-free results whose assumptions do not include the conclusion of Theorem 5.1, so they constitute independent support rather than circular premises. The paper's proof of Theorem 3.1(vii) claims sublinear growth for every p in N although assumption (N) only supplies Lévy moments up to order four; this is a breadth/correctness concern, not a circularity, and the statement is not needed for Theorem 5.1. Similarly, delegating the compactness proof to [35, Theorem 3.1] makes the exposition not fully self-contained but does not make the result equivalent to its inputs. Overall, the central claim has independent content and the derivation is conditional on explicitly stated hypotheses.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 10 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The framework relies on the standard Gelfand triple setup and on well-posedness results from the authors' earlier work; all assumptions are stated explicitly in Section 2 and Section 4. No free parameters are fitted to data and no new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (10)

standard math Gelfand triple V subset H = H* subset V* with dense continuous embeddings and ||v||_H <= lambda^{-1/2}||v||_V.
Standard variational framework, Section 2.
domain assumption Compact embedding V subset H, assumption (A5).
Used to prove compactness of the cocycle and to apply Theorem A.1; limits the setting to bounded domains or compactly embedded spaces.
domain assumption Noise condition (N): two-sided centered Lévy process in H with Lévy measure having finite moments up to order 4.
Used in the Itô estimates of Theorem 3.1 and the exponential integrability bound (3.4).
domain assumption Operator conditions (A1)-(A4) with alpha >= 2, beta >= 0, beta(alpha-1) <= 2.
Define the class of locally monotone SPDE under consideration.
domain assumption Assumption (V): existence of a strongly monotone operator M:V to V* satisfying (A1), (A2'), (A4) with beta=0.
Needed to construct the stationary OU-type process u_t (Theorem 3.1) and the conjugation in Section 4.
domain assumption Structural condition (4.5): eta,rho subadditive and eta(v)+rho(v) <= C(1+||v||^alpha_V)(1+||v||^kappa_H).
Required for uniqueness in the random PDE and local uniform continuity of the stochastic flow.
domain assumption Smallness condition K < gamma lambda/4 in (A3) for alpha=2.
Needed for the bounded absorption estimate in Proposition 5.2 and hence for the random attractor in Theorem 5.1(ii).
standard math Well-posedness for deterministic locally monotone evolution equations ([62, Theorem 1.1], quoted as Theorem A.1).
Used to solve the random PDE (4.3) pathwise for each omega.
standard math Variational well-posedness for locally monotone SPDE driven by Lévy noise ([14, Theorem 1.2]).
Provides existence and uniqueness of the solution X(t,s;omega)x used in Section 3.
standard math Birkhoff's ergodic theorem for the metric dynamical system (Omega,F,P,theta).
Used in Theorem 3.1(v)-(vi) to get Cesàro limits of ||u_r||^alpha_V and ||u_r||^p_H.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Random attractors for locally monotone stochastic partial differential equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PIFIBEMO

@misc{pith2026190803539,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Random attractors for locally monotone stochastic partial differential equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PIFIBEMO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03539}
}

abstract

We prove the existence of random dynamical systems and random attractors for a large class of locally monotone stochastic partial differential equations perturbed by additive L\'{e}vy noise. The main result is applicable to various types of SPDE such as stochastic Burgers type equations, stochastic 2D Navier-Stokes equations, the stochastic 3D Leray-$\alpha$ model, stochastic power law fluids, the stochastic Ladyzhenskaya model, stochastic Cahn-Hilliard type equations, stochastic Kuramoto-Sivashinsky type equations, stochastic porous media equations and stochastic $p$-Laplace equations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

[1]

Stochastic inte grals and the L´ evy-Ito decomposition theorem on separable Banach spaces

Sergio Albeverio and Barbara R¨ udiger. Stochastic inte grals and the L´ evy-Ito decomposition theorem on separable Banach spaces. Stoch. Anal. Appl. , 23(2):217–253, 2005

2005
[2]

L´ evy processes and stochastic calculus, volume 116 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics

David Applebaum. L´ evy processes and stochastic calculus, volume 116 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second edition, 2 009
[3]

Random dynamical systems

Ludwig Arnold. Random dynamical systems . Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 1998

1998
[4]

Burgers equation with random boundary con ditions

Yuri Bakhtin. Burgers equation with random boundary con ditions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 135(7):2257–2262, 2007

2007
[5]

Yuri Bakhtin, Eric Cator, and Konstantin M. Khanin. Spac e-time stationary solutions for the Burgers equation. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 27(1):193–238, 2014

2014
[6]

On a stochastic leray- α model of euler equations

David Barbato, Hakima Bessaih, and Benedetta Ferrario. On a stochastic leray- α model of euler equations. Stoch. Proc. Appl. , 124(1):199–219, 2014

2014
[7]

Bates, Hannelore Lisei, and Kening Lu

Peter W. Bates, Hannelore Lisei, and Kening Lu. Attracto rs for stochastic lattice dynamical systems. Stoch. Dyn. , 6(1):1–21, 2006

2006
[8]

Bates, Kening Lu, and Bixiang W ang

Peter W. Bates, Kening Lu, and Bixiang W ang. Random attra ctors for stochastic reaction- diﬀusion equations on unbounded domains. J. Diﬀerential Equations , 246(2):845–869, 2009

2009

Show all 90 references

[9]

Bates, Kening Lu, and Bixiang W ang

Peter W. Bates, Kening Lu, and Bixiang W ang. Tempered ran dom attractors for parabolic equations in weighted spaces. J. Math. Phys. , 54(8):081505, 26, 2013

2013
[10]

Bates, Kening Lu, and Bixiang W ang

Peter W. Bates, Kening Lu, and Bixiang W ang. Attractors of non-autonomous stochastic lattice systems in weighted spaces. Phys. D , 289:32–50, 2014

2014
[11]

Equations stochasti ques du type navier-stokes

Alain Bensoussan and Roger Temam. Equations stochasti ques du type navier-stokes. Journal of Functional Analysis , 13(2):195–222, 1973

1973
[12]

The global random attractor for a class of stochastic porous media equations

W olf-J¨ urgen Beyn, Benjamin Gess, Paul Lescot, and Mic hael R¨ ockner. The global random attractor for a class of stochastic porous media equations. Comm. Partial Diﬀerential Equa- tions, 36(3):446–469, 2011

2011
[13]

Asymptotic compact ness and absorbing sets for 2d sto- chastic navier-stokes equations on some unbounded domains

Zdzislaw Brze´ zniak and Yuhong Li. Asymptotic compact ness and absorbing sets for 2d sto- chastic navier-stokes equations on some unbounded domains . Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 358(12):5587–5629, 2006

2006
[14]

Strong so lutions for SPDE with locally mono- tone coeﬃcients driven by Levy noise

Zdzislaw Brze´ zniak, W ei Liu, and Jiahui Zhu. Strong so lutions for SPDE with locally mono- tone coeﬃcients driven by Levy noise. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. , 17:283–310, 2014

2014
[15]

Dynamics for a stochastic reaction-diﬀusion equation with additive noise

Daomin Cao, Chunyou Sun, and Meihua Yang. Dynamics for a stochastic reaction-diﬀusion equation with additive noise. J. Diﬀerential Equations , 259(3):838–872, 2015

2015
[16]

Tom´ as Caraballo and Jos´ e A. Langa. On the upper semico ntinuity of cocycle attractors for non-autonomous and random dynamical systems. Dyn. Contin. Discrete Impuls. Syst. Ser. A Math. Anal. , 10(4):491–513, 2003

2003
[17]

Langa, and James C

Tom´ as Caraballo, Jos´ e A. Langa, and James C. Robinson. Upper semicontinuity of attractors for small random perturbations of dynamical systems. Comm. Partial Diﬀerential Equations , 23(9-10):1557–1581, 1998

1998
[18]

Holm, Eric Olson, and Edris s S

Alexey Cheskidov, Darryl D. Holm, Eric Olson, and Edris s S. Titi. On a Leray- α model of turbulence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. , 461(2055):629–649, 2005

2005
[19]

Chueshov and Annie Millet

Igor D. Chueshov and Annie Millet. Stochastic 2D hydrod ynamical type systems: well posed- ness and large deviations. Appl. Math. Optim. , 61(3):379–420, 2010

2010
[20]

Ra ndom attractors

Hans Crauel, Arnaud Debussche, and Franco Flandoli. Ra ndom attractors. J. Dynam. Dif- ferential Equations , 9(2):307–341, 1997

1997
[21]

C riteria for strong and weak random attractors

Hans Crauel, Georgi Dimitroﬀ, and Michael Scheutzow. C riteria for strong and weak random attractors. J. Dynam. Diﬀerential Equations , 21(2):233–247, 2009

2009
[22]

Attractors for random dynamical systems

Hans Crauel and Franco Flandoli. Attractors for random dynamical systems. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 100(3):365–393, 1994

1994
[23]

Langa, and Yangrong Li

Hongyong Cui, Jos´ e A. Langa, and Yangrong Li. Measurab ility of random attractors for quasi strong-to-weak continuous random dynamical systems. J. Dynam. Diﬀerential Equations , 30(4):1873–1898, 2018. RANDOM ATTRACTORS FOR LOCALLY MONOTONE SPDE 31

2018
[24]

Stochastic Cah n-Hilliard equation

Giuseppe Da Prato and Arnaud Debussche. Stochastic Cah n-Hilliard equation. Nonlinear Anal., 26(2):241–263, 1996

1996
[25]

m-dissipativity of Kolmogorov operators cor- responding to Burgers equations with space-time white nois e

Giuseppe Da Prato and Arnaud Debussche. m-dissipativity of Kolmogorov operators cor- responding to Burgers equations with space-time white nois e. Potential Anal. , 26(1):31–55, 2007

2007
[26]

On the ﬁnite dimensionality of rando m attractors

Arnaud Debussche. On the ﬁnite dimensionality of rando m attractors. Stochastic Anal. Appl. , 15(4):473–491, 1997

1997
[27]

On the 3-D stochastic magnetohydrodynamic-α model

Gabriel Deugou´ e, Paul Andr´ e Razaﬁmandimby, and Mamadou Sango. On the 3-D stochastic magnetohydrodynamic-α model. Stochastic Process. Appl. , 122(5):2211–2248, 2012

2012
[28]

On the strong soluti on for the 3D stochastic Leray- alpha model

Gabriel Deugoue and Mamadou Sango. On the strong soluti on for the 3D stochastic Leray- alpha model. Bound. Value Probl. , 2010

2010
[29]

Khanin, Alexander E

W einan E, Konstantin M. Khanin, Alexander E. Mazel, and Yakov G. Sinai. Invariant mea- sures for Burgers equation with stochastic forcing. Ann. of Math. (2) , 151(3):877–960, 2000

2000
[30]

On the stochastic C ahn-Hilliard equation

Neven Elezovi´ c and Andro Mikeli´ c. On the stochastic C ahn-Hilliard equation. Nonlinear Anal., 16(12):1169–1200, 1991

1991
[31]

Random attractor for a damped sine-Gordo n equation with white noise

Xiaoming Fan. Random attractor for a damped sine-Gordo n equation with white noise. Pa- ciﬁc J. Math. , 216(1):63–76, 2004

2004
[32]

Synchronization by noise

Franco Flandoli, Benjamin Gess, and Michael Scheutzow . Synchronization by noise. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 168(3-4):511–556, 2017

2017
[33]

Non-homogeneous generalized Newtonian ﬂuids

Jens Frehse and Michael R ˚ uˇ ziˇ cka. Non-homogeneous generalized Newtonian ﬂuids. Math. Z. , 260(2):355–375, 2008

2008
[34]

Random Attractors for Degenerate Stoch astic Partial Diﬀerential Equations

Benjamin Gess. Random Attractors for Degenerate Stoch astic Partial Diﬀerential Equations. J. Dynam. Diﬀerential Equations , 25(1):121–157, 2013

2013
[35]

Random attractors for singular stochas tic evolution equations

Benjamin Gess. Random attractors for singular stochas tic evolution equations. J. Diﬀerential Equations, 255(3):524–559, 2013

2013
[36]

Random attractors for stochastic porou s media equations perturbed by space- time linear multiplicative noise

Benjamin Gess. Random attractors for stochastic porou s media equations perturbed by space- time linear multiplicative noise. Ann. Probab., 42(2):818–864, 2014

2014
[37]

Random at tractors for a class of stochastic partial diﬀerential equations driven by general additive n oise

Benjamin Gess, W ei Liu, and Michael R¨ ockner. Random at tractors for a class of stochastic partial diﬀerential equations driven by general additive n oise. J. Diﬀerential Equations , 251(4- 5):1225–1253, 2011

2011
[38]

Benjamin Gess and Jonas M. T¨ olle. Ergodicity and local limits for stochastic local and non- local p-Laplace equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 48(6):4094–4125, 2016

2016
[39]

Regula rity of random attractors for frac- tional stochastic reaction-diﬀusion equations on Rn

Anhui Gu, Dingshi Li, Bixiang W ang, and Han Yang. Regula rity of random attractors for frac- tional stochastic reaction-diﬀusion equations on Rn. J. Diﬀerential Equations , 264(12):7094– 7137, 2018

2018
[40]

Dynamic behavior of stochasti c p-Laplacian-type lattice equa- tions

Anhui Gu and Yangrong Li. Dynamic behavior of stochasti c p-Laplacian-type lattice equa- tions. Stoch. Dyn. , 17(5):1750040, 19, 2017

2017
[41]

Asymptotic behavior of rando m Fitzhugh-Nagumo systems driven by colored noise

Anhui Gu and Bixiang W ang. Asymptotic behavior of rando m Fitzhugh-Nagumo systems driven by colored noise. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B , 23(4):1689–1720, 2018

2018
[42]

Remark on random attractor s of stochastic non-Newtonian ﬂuid

Boling Guo and Chunxiao Guo. Remark on random attractor s of stochastic non-Newtonian ﬂuid. J. Partial Diﬀer. Equ. , 23(1):16–32, 2010

2010
[43]

On the cohomolog y of ﬂows of stochastic and random diﬀerential equations

Peter Imkeller and Christian Lederer. On the cohomolog y of ﬂows of stochastic and random diﬀerential equations. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 120(2):209–235, 2001

2001
[44]

Renato Iturriaga and Konstantin M. Khanin. Burgers tur bulence and random Lagrangian systems. Comm. Math. Phys. , 232(3):377–428, 2003

2003
[45]

Chapman & Hall, London, 1996

Mirko Rokyta Josef M´ alek, Jindˇ rich Neˇ cas and Michael R ˚ uˇ ziˇ cka.Weak and measure-valued solutions to evolutionary PDEs , volume 13 of Applied Mathematics and Mathematical Com- putation. Chapman & Hall, London, 1996

1996
[46]

Attractors of second order stochastic diﬀerential equatio ns

Hannes Keller. Attractors of second order stochastic diﬀerential equatio ns. Logos Verlag Berlin, Berlin, 2002

2002
[47]

Pullback attractors of non-autonomous stochastic degen- erate parabolic equations on unbounded domains

Andrew Krause and Bixiang W ang. Pullback attractors of non-autonomous stochastic degen- erate parabolic equations on unbounded domains. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 417(2):1018–1038, 2014

2014
[48]

Kuksin and Shirikyan Armen R

Serge ˘ ı B. Kuksin and Shirikyan Armen R. On random attra ctors for systems of mixing type. Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen. , 38(1):34–46, 2004

2004
[49]

Diﬀusion-induced chaos in reaction systems

Yoshiki Kuramoto. Diﬀusion-induced chaos in reaction systems. Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement , 64:346–367, 1978

1978
[50]

Ladyzhenskaya

Olga A. Ladyzhenskaya. New equations for the description of the viscous incompress ible ﬂuids and solvability in large of the boundary value problems for t hem, volume V of Boundary Value Problems of Mathematical Physics . 1970

1970
[51]

Jos´ e A. Langa. Finite-dimensional limiting dynamics of random dynamical systems. Dyn. Syst., 18(1):57–68, 2003. 32 B. GESS, W. LIU, AND A. SCHENKE

2003
[52]

Christian Lederer. Konjugation stochastischer und zu f¨ alliger station¨ arer Diﬀerentialgleichun- gen und eine Version des lokalen Satzes von Hartman-Grobman f¨ ur stochastische Diﬀeren- tialgleichungen. PhD thesis , 2001

2001
[53]

Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux empl issant l’espace

Jean Leray. Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux empl issant l’espace. Acta Math. , 63(1):193–248, 1934

1934
[54]

Random attractor s for stochastic parabolic equations with additive noise in weighted spaces

Xiaojun Li, Xiliang Li, and Kening Lu. Random attractor s for stochastic parabolic equations with additive noise in weighted spaces. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. , 17(3):729–749, 2018

2018
[55]

Upper semi-conti nuity and regularity of random attractors on p-times integrable spaces and applications

Yangrong Li, Hongyong Cui, and Jia Li. Upper semi-conti nuity and regularity of random attractors on p-times integrable spaces and applications. Nonlinear Anal., 109:33–44, 2014

2014
[56]

Existence and continu ity of bi-spatial random attrac- tors and application to stochastic semilinear Laplacian eq uations

Yangrong Li, Anhui Gu, and Jia Li. Existence and continu ity of bi-spatial random attrac- tors and application to stochastic semilinear Laplacian eq uations. J. Diﬀerential Equations , 258(2):504–534, 2015

2015
[57]

Random attractors for quasi -continuous random dynamical systems and applications to stochastic reaction-diﬀusion equations

Yangrong Li and Boling Guo. Random attractors for quasi -continuous random dynamical systems and applications to stochastic reaction-diﬀusion equations. J. Diﬀerential Equations , 245(7):1775–1800, 2008

2008
[58]

Existence, regularity and a pproximation of global attractors for weakly dissipative p-Laplace equations

Yangrong Li and Jinyan Yin. Existence, regularity and a pproximation of global attractors for weakly dissipative p-Laplace equations. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S , 9(6):1939–1957, 2016

1939
[59]

A modiﬁed proof of pullback a ttractors in a Sobolev space for stochastic FitzHugh-Nagumo equations

Yangrong Li and Jinyan Yin. A modiﬁed proof of pullback a ttractors in a Sobolev space for stochastic FitzHugh-Nagumo equations. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B , 21(4):1203–1223, 2016

2016
[60]

Existence and uniqueness of solutions to nonli near evolution equations with locally monotone operators

W ei Liu. Existence and uniqueness of solutions to nonli near evolution equations with locally monotone operators. Nonlinear Anal. , 74:7543–7561, 2011

2011
[61]

SPDE in Hilbert space with locally monotone coeﬃcients

W ei Liu and Michael R¨ ockner. SPDE in Hilbert space with locally monotone coeﬃcients. J. Funct. Anal., 259(11):2902–2922, 2010

2010
[62]

Local and global well-pos edness of SPDE with generalized coercivity conditions

W ei Liu and Michael R¨ ockner. Local and global well-pos edness of SPDE with generalized coercivity conditions. J. Diﬀerential Equations , 254:725–755, 2013

2013
[63]

Stochastic Partial Diﬀerential Equations: An Introductio n

W ei Liu and Michael R¨ ockner. Stochastic Partial Diﬀerential Equations: An Introductio n. Universitext. Springer, Heidelberg, 2015

2015
[64]

Ra ndom attractors for non- autonomous fractional stochastic parabolic equations on u nbounded domains

Hong Lu, Jiangang Qi, Bixiang W ang, and Mingji Zhang. Ra ndom attractors for non- autonomous fractional stochastic parabolic equations on u nbounded domains. Discrete Con- tin. Dyn. Syst. , 39(2):683–706, 2019

2019
[65]

Michelson and Gregory I

Daniel M. Michelson and Gregory I. Sivashinsky. Nonlin ear analysis of hydrodynamic in- stability in laminar ﬂames. II. Numerical experiments. Acta Astronaut., 4(11-12):1207–1221, 1977

1977
[66]

On Cahn-Hilliard type equations

Amy Novick-Cohen. On Cahn-Hilliard type equations. Nonlinear Anal., 15(9):797–814, 1990

1990
[67]

The Cahn-Hilliard equation: mathem atical and modeling perspectives

Amy Novick-Cohen. The Cahn-Hilliard equation: mathem atical and modeling perspectives. Adv. Math. Sci. Appl. , 8(2):965–985, 1998

1998
[68]

Stochastic partial diﬀerential equations with L´ evy noise , volume 113 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications

Szymon Peszat and Jerzy Zabczyk. Stochastic partial diﬀerential equations with L´ evy noise , volume 113 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007. An evolution equation approach

2007
[69]

Backward cocycle and attractors of stochastic diﬀerential equations

Bj¨ orn Schmalfuss. Backward cocycle and attractors of stochastic diﬀerential equations. In V. Reitmann, T. Riedrich, and N. Koksch, editors, International Seminar on Applied Mathe- matics - Nonlinear Dynamics: Attractor Approximation and G lobal Behavior, pages 185–192. Techn...

1992
[70]

Asym ptotic behavior of the stochastic Keller-Segel equations

Yadong Shang, Jianjun Paul Tian, and Bixiang W ang. Asym ptotic behavior of the stochastic Keller-Segel equations. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B , 24(3):1367–1391, 2019

2019
[71]

Sivashinsky

Gregory I. Sivashinsky. On ﬂame propagation under cond itions of stoichiometry. SIAM J. Appl. Math. , 39(1):67–82, 1980

1980
[72]

Analytic semigroups and semilinear initial boundary value problems

Kazuaki Taira. Analytic semigroups and semilinear initial boundary value problems. Cam- bridge University Press, 1995

1995
[73]

Navier-Stokes equations

Roger Temam. Navier-Stokes equations . AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence, RI, 2001. Theory and numerical analysis, Reprint of the 1984 edition

2001
[74]

Vishik, Edriss S

Mark I. Vishik, Edriss S. Titi, and Vladimir V. Chepyzho v. On the convergence of trajectory attractors of the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes α -model as α → 0. Mat. Sb. , 198(12):3–36, 2007

2007
[75]

Random attractors for the stochastic Ben jamin-Bona-Mahony equation on unbounded domains

Bixiang W ang. Random attractors for the stochastic Ben jamin-Bona-Mahony equation on unbounded domains. J. Diﬀerential Equations , 246(6):2506–2537, 2009

2009
[76]

Existence and upper semicontinuity of at tractors for stochastic equations with deterministic non-autonomous terms

Bixiang W ang. Existence and upper semicontinuity of at tractors for stochastic equations with deterministic non-autonomous terms. Stoch. Dyn. , 14(4), 2014

2014
[77]

Asymptotic behavior of non-autonomous f ractional stochastic reaction- diﬀusion equations

Bixiang W ang. Asymptotic behavior of non-autonomous f ractional stochastic reaction- diﬀusion equations. Nonlinear Anal. , 158:60–82, 2017. RANDOM ATTRACTORS FOR LOCALLY MONOTONE SPDE 33

2017
[78]

W eak pullback attractors for mean random dynamical systems in bochner spaces

Bixiang W ang. W eak pullback attractors for mean random dynamical systems in bochner spaces. J. Dynam. Diﬀerential Equations , 2018

2018
[79]

W eak pullback attractors for stochastic Navier-Stokes equations with nonlin- ear diﬀusion terms

Bixiang W ang. W eak pullback attractors for stochastic Navier-Stokes equations with nonlin- ear diﬀusion terms. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 147(4):1627–1638, 2019

2019
[80]

W ong-Zakai ap proximations and attractors for stochastic reaction-diﬀusion equations on unbounded d omains

Xiaohu W ang, Kening Lu, and Bixiang W ang. W ong-Zakai ap proximations and attractors for stochastic reaction-diﬀusion equations on unbounded d omains. J. Diﬀerential Equations , 264(1):378–424, 2018

2018
[81]

Random attractors for the stochastic Kur amoto-Sivashinsky equation

Desheng Yang. Random attractors for the stochastic Kur amoto-Sivashinsky equation. Stoch. Anal. Appl. , 24(6):1285–1303, 2006

2006
[82]

Meihua Yang and P. E. Kloeden. Random attractors for sto chastic semi-linear degenerate parabolic equations. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. , 12(5):2811–2821, 2011

2011
[83]

Two types of upper semi-cont inuity of bi-spatial attractors for non-autonomous stochastic p-Laplacian equations on Rn

Jinyan Yin and Yangrong Li. Two types of upper semi-cont inuity of bi-spatial attractors for non-autonomous stochastic p-Laplacian equations on Rn. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. , 40(13):4863–4879, 2017

2017
[84]

Random attractor for stocha stic partial functional diﬀerential equations with inﬁnite delay

Honglian You and Rong Yuan. Random attractor for stocha stic partial functional diﬀerential equations with inﬁnite delay. Bull. Korean Math. Soc. , 51(5):1469–1484, 2014

2014
[85]

Random attractor for the La dyzhenskaya model with additive noise

Caidi Zhao and Jinqiao Duan. Random attractor for the La dyzhenskaya model with additive noise. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 362(1):241–251, 2010

2010
[86]

Long-time random dynamics of stochasti c parabolic p-Laplacian equations on RN

W enqiang Zhao. Long-time random dynamics of stochasti c parabolic p-Laplacian equations on RN . Nonlinear Anal. , 152:196–219, 2017

2017
[87]

Random dynamics of stochastic p-Laplacian equations on RN with an un- bounded additive noise

W enqiang Zhao. Random dynamics of stochastic p-Laplacian equations on RN with an un- bounded additive noise. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 455(2):1178–1203, 2017

2017
[88]

Existence of random attr actors for a p-Laplacian-type equation with additive noise

W enqiang Zhao and Yangrong Li. Existence of random attr actors for a p-Laplacian-type equation with additive noise. Abstract and Applied Analysis , pages 1–21, 2011

2011
[89]

Fractal dimension of random attractor for stochastic non- autonomous damped wave equation with linear multiplicativ e white noise

Shengfan Zhou and Min Zhao. Fractal dimension of random attractor for stochastic non- autonomous damped wave equation with linear multiplicativ e white noise. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. , 36(5):2887–2914, 2016

2016
[90]

Random attractor assoc iated with the quasi-geostrophic equation

Rongchan Zhu and Xiangchan Zhu. Random attractor assoc iated with the quasi-geostrophic equation. J. Dynam. Diﬀerential Equations , 29(1):289–322, 2017

2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Stochastic inte grals and the L´ evy-Ito decomposition theorem on separable Banach spaces

Sergio Albeverio and Barbara R¨ udiger. Stochastic inte grals and the L´ evy-Ito decomposition theorem on separable Banach spaces. Stoch. Anal. Appl. , 23(2):217–253, 2005

2005

[2] [2]

L´ evy processes and stochastic calculus, volume 116 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics

David Applebaum. L´ evy processes and stochastic calculus, volume 116 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second edition, 2 009

[3] [3]

Random dynamical systems

Ludwig Arnold. Random dynamical systems . Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 1998

1998

[4] [4]

Burgers equation with random boundary con ditions

Yuri Bakhtin. Burgers equation with random boundary con ditions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 135(7):2257–2262, 2007

2007

[5] [5]

Yuri Bakhtin, Eric Cator, and Konstantin M. Khanin. Spac e-time stationary solutions for the Burgers equation. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 27(1):193–238, 2014

2014

[6] [6]

On a stochastic leray- α model of euler equations

David Barbato, Hakima Bessaih, and Benedetta Ferrario. On a stochastic leray- α model of euler equations. Stoch. Proc. Appl. , 124(1):199–219, 2014

2014

[7] [7]

Bates, Hannelore Lisei, and Kening Lu

Peter W. Bates, Hannelore Lisei, and Kening Lu. Attracto rs for stochastic lattice dynamical systems. Stoch. Dyn. , 6(1):1–21, 2006

2006

[8] [8]

Bates, Kening Lu, and Bixiang W ang

Peter W. Bates, Kening Lu, and Bixiang W ang. Random attra ctors for stochastic reaction- diﬀusion equations on unbounded domains. J. Diﬀerential Equations , 246(2):845–869, 2009

2009