Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 62 references

Holomorphic Deformations of Compact K\"ahler Hyperbolic Manifolds

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes modified versions of Kähler hyperbolicity that behave better under holomorphic deformation, as a first step toward the deformation-openness question for Gromov's notion.

desk verdict Unreadable posting, one-sentence abstract; there is no math to referee until the author supplies a legible source. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.07096 v2 pith:PJD5Y3XW submitted 2025-08-09 math.AG math.CVmath.DG

Abdelouahab Khelifati This is my paper
classification math.AGmath.CVmath.DG MSC 32Q1532G0553C5532Q45
keywords KählerhyperbolicityGromovdeformationopennesscompactmanifoldsholomorphicdeformationsboundedformsuniversalcover
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is trying to get traction on an open question in Kähler geometry: whether Gromov's notion of Kähler hyperbolicity is preserved when a compact Kähler manifold is slightly deformed. Because Gromov's condition—the Kähler form lifts to the universal cover as the exterior derivative of a bounded 1-form—is delicate in families, the author introduces slightly modified versions of the condition designed to be more tractable under holomorphic deformations. The intended contribution is a first step: if the modified notions are genuine stand-ins for Gromov's, their deformation behavior gives a way to approach the openness question. A sympathetic reader would care because deformation openness would mean Kähler hyperbolicity is a stable geometric property, constraining which manifolds can appear in a family.

What carries the argument

The central object is the modified boundedness condition replacing Gromov's requirement that the pullback of the Kähler form to the universal cover be $d$ of a bounded 1-form. The paper's variants relax or adjust that boundedness so that the condition can be followed through a holomorphic family; this is what makes the deformation problem accessible.

What would settle it

A single compact Kähler hyperbolic manifold that admits a small holomorphic deformation failing the paper's modified condition would falsify the strategy. Concretely, along a nontrivial deformation family of a Kähler hyperbolic manifold, compute the lifted Kähler potential for nearby fibres and check whether it remains bounded in the norm required by the modified definition; one nearby fibre with unbounded potential is enough to show the modified notion is not a faithful stand-in.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that slightly modified Kähler-hyperbolicity conditions can serve as a tool for studying deformations of compact Kähler hyperbolic manifolds. The author proposes these variants explicitly as a first step toward deciding whether Gromov's classical Kähler hyperbolicity is open under holomorphic deformation—that is, whether a small deformation of a Kähler hyperbolic manifold is again Kähler hyperbolic. The discovery on offer is a deformation-friendly reformulation of the notion, not a full resolution of openness.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the paper's modified definitions are genuinely connected to Gromov's Kähler hyperbolicity—either every Kähler hyperbolic manifold satisfies them, or they imply it on the examples that matter—so that their deformation behavior tells us something about the openness of the original notion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the modified conditions are deformation-open, then any compact Kähler manifold satisfying one of them remains in that class under small holomorphic deformations.
  • That openness gives a concrete route toward the original problem: one only needs to compare the modified conditions with Gromov's to settle whether Kähler hyperbolicity itself is open.
  • The modified notions provide a framework in which one can test examples and obstructions without leaving the category of compact Kähler manifolds.
  • A positive comparison would imply that Kähler hyperbolic manifolds cannot be destroyed by small deformations, giving stability of the associated geometric and topological features.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the modified conditions are strictly weaker than Gromov's, openness of the modified class does not by itself settle Gromov's openness question; a comparison theorem would be needed to bridge the gap.
  • A direct next test is to check the modified conditions on standard Kähler hyperbolic examples—products of curves, ball quotients, and complex tori with appropriate metrics—and to see whether a nontrivial deformation family preserves the relevant bounded form.
  • The same strategy might transfer to other metric notions where a bounded potential can be defined, suggesting a broader principle: replace a rigid boundedness condition by a deformable cousin and study deformation behavior first.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper, as posted, is not reviewable in any standard sense. The only legible portion is the abstract, which states that the paper studies deformations of compact Kähler hyperbolic manifolds and proposes 'slightly modified versions' of Kähler hyperbolicity as a tool toward understanding deformation openness of Gromov's classical notion. The body of the manuscript is garbled mojibake: no definition, theorem, lemma, proof, or example can be read. The full text also contains an inserted arXiv header from an unrelated quant-ph paper (arXiv:2508.07104v1). Consequently, the manuscript's central claims—the nature of the modified notions, their non-vacuity, their relation to Gromov's notion, and the deformation results—cannot be inspected or verified from the posted text.

Significance. If the paper were correct, it could provide a useful new tool: modified Kähler-hyperbolicity conditions whose deformation behavior is tractable, and thereby a first step toward the openness question for Gromov's notion. However, the posted manuscript supplies no legible definitions, theorems, or computations. The abstract is programmatic rather than substantive. I cannot assess significance beyond the general interest of the question, because there is nothing checkable to support the stated claims. I also note that the paper does not appear to contain machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or other externally verifiable artifacts; the only artifact is the corrupted text.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text (body after abstract)] The body of the manuscript is unrecoverable mojibake beginning immediately after the abstract ('�������� �� ������������ ...'). No definition, proposition, proof, or worked example is legible. The title announces results on holomorphic deformations of compact Kähler hyperbolic manifolds, but the only verifiable mathematical content is the abstract's two-sentence proposal. This is load-bearing: the deformation-openness claim, the proposed modified definitions, and their relationship to Gromov's notion cannot be checked in any way.
  2. [Full text, near end] The full text contains the line '������������� ���� �������� ������� ��������� �� arXiv:2508.07104v1 [quant-ph] 9 Aug 2025'. This is the arXiv header of an unrelated quantum-physics submission, not part of a mathematics paper on Kähler hyperbolicity. Its presence shows that the posted file is not a clean copy of the authors' own text. As a result, even the boundaries of the manuscript—where the paper begins and ends—are unclear, compounding the inability to review the technical content.
  3. [Abstract] The abstract proposes 'slightly modified versions of Kähler hyperbolicity' but gives no definitions, theorem statements, or comparisons with Gromov's original notion. A first step toward deformation openness requires at least one bridge: either every compact Kähler hyperbolic manifold satisfies the modified condition, or the modified condition implies Gromov hyperbolicity on a substantial class, or some explicit non-vacuous family is identified. None of this appears in the legible text. Without such a bridge, deformation openness of the modified notions (if proved) would not transfer to Gromov's property. This is not an accusation of circularity, but an indication that the central premise is currently unsupported.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Title/Abstract] The title promises 'Holomorphic Deformations', but the abstract only announces tools. A precise main theorem or conjecture should be stated in the abstract once the manuscript becomes legible.
  2. [References] No references are legible, including Gromov's original definition of Kähler hyperbolicity and subsequent work on deformation rigidity. These should be included in a corrected submission.
  3. [Presentation] The inserted quant-ph arXiv header and the mojibake text indicate a severe file-conversion or upload error. The authors should be asked to resubmit a properly compiled PDF or LaTeX source.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity identifiable in the visible abstract; the unreadable body prevents any specific reduction from being exhibited.

full rationale

Only the abstract is legible in the posted manuscript; the body is garbled and unrecoverable encoding garbage, with an inserted header from arXiv:2508.07104 (quant-ph). The abstract states the goal of proposing 'slightly modified versions of Kähler hyperbolicity as a tool' toward studying deformation openness of Gromov's notion. This is a proposal of a tool, not a derivation of a result from a premise that equals its conclusion. No equation, definition, or proof can be inspected to exhibit a specific reduction (e.g., a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, or a definition that already contains the target property). The absence of a legible theorem statement makes it impossible to verify any circular step, but also means no concrete circularity is evident. Concerns about whether the modified notions are actually connected to Gromov's Kähler hyperbolicity are legitimate correctness/inspectability concerns, not demonstrated circularity. Per the hard rules, circularity cannot be claimed without quoting the paper and exhibiting the specific reduction. No such evidence exists in the readable text, so the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The ledger is abstract-only: the paper announces a new family of definitions whose precise content could not be read. Free parameters: none visible (geometry paper, no data fitting). Axioms are the standard background plus the key bridging premise that the modified notions relate to Gromov's. The invented entity is the proposed class of modified hyperbolicity notions, which lacks any falsifiable handle in the abstract.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Gromov's definition of Kähler hyperbolicity: a compact Kähler manifold (M, ω) is Kähler hyperbolic when ω = dη for a bounded 1-form η, with its standard consequences such as vanishing odd Betti numbers.
    Invoked as the target notion in the abstract; not restated or proved in the legible text.
  • domain assumption Standard deformation theory of compact Kähler manifolds (Kodaira-Spencer: first-order deformations governed by H^1(M, T_M); unobstructedness depends on the manifold).
    Any claim about deformation openness presupposes the standard apparatus of small deformations; the abstract names 'deformations' without defining them.
  • ad hoc to paper The proposed modified notions of Kähler hyperbolicity are non-vacuous and comparable to Gromov's notion, with an implication in at least one direction on the intended class of manifolds.
    This is the load-bearing premise of the abstract's strategy: modified definitions are only a tool for Gromov's question if they are connected to Gromov's property. Not verifiable from the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • Slightly modified versions of Kähler hyperbolicity (unnamed in the abstract)
    purpose: Provide a deformation-behavior test bed as a first step toward openness of Gromov's original notion.
    Announced but not defined in the legible text; no falsifiable consequence (for example, a specific manifold satisfying or failing the modified property) is stated. Without such a handle this is, on present evidence, a placeholder entity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Holomorphic Deformations of Compact K\"ahler Hyperbolic Manifolds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PJD5Y3XW

@misc{pith2026250807096,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Holomorphic Deformations of Compact K\"ahler Hyperbolic Manifolds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PJD5Y3XW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.07096}
}
read the original abstract

The goal of this paper is to study the deformations of compact K\"ahler hyperbolic manifolds. We propose slightly modified versions of K\"ahler hyperbolicity as a tool to provide a first step towards investigating the deformation openness of Gromov's classical notion of K\"ahler hyperbolicity.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Notes on word hyperbolic groups

    JM Alonso, T Brady, D Cooper, V Ferlini, M Mihalik, M Shapiro, H Short, et al. Notes on word hyperbolic groups. In Group Theory From a Geometric Viewpoint: Proceedings of the Group Theory from a Geometrical Viewpoint , pages 3--63. World Scientific Publishing, 1991

    work page 1991

  2. [2]

    Elliptic operators, discrete groups and von neumann algebras

    M.F Atiyah. Elliptic operators, discrete groups and von neumann algebras. Astérisque , 32(33):43--72, 1976

    work page 1976

  3. [3]

    a hler H yperbolic manifolds and the G reen-- G riffiths-- L ang conjecture. Journal f \

    Francesco Bei, Simone Diverio, Philippe Eyssidieux, and Stefano Trapani. Weakly K \"a hler H yperbolic manifolds and the G reen-- G riffiths-- L ang conjecture. Journal f \"u r die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal) , 2024(807):257--297, 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Geometric effects of hyperbolic cohomology classes on k " ahler manifolds

    Francesco Bei, Simone Diverio, and Stefano Trapani. Geometric effects of hyperbolic cohomology classes on k " ahler manifolds. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.09907 , 2025

    arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    The geometry of discrete groups , volume 91

    Alan F Beardon. The geometry of discrete groups , volume 91. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    On atoroidal and hyperbolic cohomology classes

    M Brunnbauer, D Kotschick, and Lukas Sch \"o nlinner. On atoroidal and hyperbolic cohomology classes. Topology and its Applications , 344:108830, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Compact manifolds and hyperbolicity

    Robert Brody. Compact manifolds and hyperbolicity. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , 235:213--219, 1978

    work page 1978

  8. [8]

    Compact K \"a hler manifolds homotopic to negatively curved R iemannian manifolds

    Bing-Long Chen and Xiaokui Yang. Compact K \"a hler manifolds homotopic to negatively curved R iemannian manifolds. Mathematische Annalen , 370:1477--1489, 2018

    work page 2018

Show all 62 references
  1. [9]

    On euler characteristic and fundamental groups of compact manifolds

    Bing-Long Chen and Xiaokui Yang. On euler characteristic and fundamental groups of compact manifolds. Mathematische Annalen , 381:1723--1743, 2021

    2021

  2. [10]

    Complex analytic and differential geometry

    Jean-Pierre Demailly. Complex analytic and differential geometry . Citeseer, 1997

    1997

  3. [11]

    Cuts in k \"a hler groups

    Thomas Delzant and Misha Gromov. Cuts in k \"a hler groups. Infinite groups: geometric, combinatorial and dynamical aspects , pages 31--55, 2005

    2005

  4. [12]

    A generalised volume invariant for A eppli cohomology classes of H ermitian-symplectic metrics

    S awomir Dinew and Dan Popovici. A generalised volume invariant for A eppli cohomology classes of H ermitian-symplectic metrics. Advances in Mathematics , 393:108056, 2021

    2021

  5. [13]

    Vari \'e t \'e s diff \'e rentiables : F ormes, C ourants, F ormes harmoniques

    Georges De Rham. Vari \'e t \'e s diff \'e rentiables : F ormes, C ourants, F ormes harmoniques . FeniXX, 1955

    1955

  6. [14]

    Sur les espaces fibr \'e s diff \'e rentiables

    Charles Ehresmann. Sur les espaces fibr \'e s diff \'e rentiables. CR Acad. Sci. Paris , 224(1611-1612):9, 1947

    1947

  7. [15]

    Linear shafarevich conjecture

    Philippe Eyssidieux, Ludmil Katzarkov, Tony Pantev, and Mohan Ramachandran. Linear shafarevich conjecture. Annals of mathematics , pages 1545--1581, 2012

    2012

  8. [16]

    Private communication

    Philippe Eyssidieux. Private communication. October , 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    A special S tokes's theorem for complete R iemannian manifolds

    Matthew P Gaffney. A special S tokes's theorem for complete R iemannian manifolds. Annals of Mathematics , 60(1):140--145, 1954

    1954

  10. [18]

    Fibr \'e s hermitiens \`a endomorphisme de ricci non n \'e gatif

    Paul Gauduchon. Fibr \'e s hermitiens \`a endomorphisme de ricci non n \'e gatif. Bulletin de la Soci \'e t \'e Math \'e matique de France , 105:113--140, 1977

    1977

  11. [19]

    Le th \'e oreme de l’excentricit \'e nulle

    Paul Gauduchon. Le th \'e oreme de l’excentricit \'e nulle. CR Acad. Sci. Paris S \'e r. AB , 285(5):A387--A390, 1977

    1977

  12. [20]

    Sur les groupes hyperboliques d’apres M ikhael G romov , volume 83

    Etienne Ghys and Pierre da la Harpe. Sur les groupes hyperboliques d’apres M ikhael G romov , volume 83. Birkhäuser, 1990

    1990

  13. [21]

    Les groupes hyperboliques

    E Ghys. Les groupes hyperboliques. S \'e minaire Bourbaki , 1989:90, 1989

    1989

  14. [22]

    Hyperbolic manifolds, groups and actions

    Mikhael Gromov. Hyperbolic manifolds, groups and actions. In Riemann surfaces and related topics: Proceedings of the 1978 Stony Brook Conference (State Univ. New York, Stony Brook, NY, 1978) , volume 97, pages 183--213, 1981

    1978

  15. [23]

    Hyperbolic groups

    Mikhael Gromov. Hyperbolic groups. In Essays in group theory , pages 75--263. Springer, 1987

    1987

  16. [24]

    K \"a hler H yperbolicity and L^2 - H odge theory

    Mikhail Gromov. K \"a hler H yperbolicity and L^2 - H odge theory. Journal of differential geometry , 33(1):263--292, 1991

    1991

  17. [25]

    u rgen Jost and Kang Zuo. Vanishing theorems for L ^2 -cohomology on infinite coverings of compact K \

    J \"u rgen Jost and Kang Zuo. Vanishing theorems for L ^2 -cohomology on infinite coverings of compact K \"a hler manifolds and applications in algebraic geometry. COMMUNICATIONS IN ANALYSIS AND GEOMETRY , 8(1):1--30, 1998

    1998

  18. [26]

    Fuchsian groups

    Svetlana Katok. Fuchsian groups . University of Chicago press, 1992

    1992

  19. [27]

    On the length of an extremal rational curve

    Yujiro Kawamata. On the length of an extremal rational curve. Inventiones mathematicae , 105(1):609--611, 1991

    1991

  20. [28]

    Connection of the dual space of a group with the structure of its close subgroups

    David A Kazhdan. Connection of the dual space of a group with the structure of its close subgroups. Functional analysis and its applications , 1(1):63--65, 1967

    1967

  21. [29]

    Symplectically hyperbolic manifolds

    Jarek Kedra. Symplectically hyperbolic manifolds. Differential Geometry and its Applications , 27(4):455--463, 2009

    2009

  22. [30]

    faux plans projectifs

    Bruno Klingler. Sur la rigidit \'e de certains groupes fondamentaux, l’arithm \'e ticit \'e des r \'e seaux hyperboliques complexes, et les “faux plans projectifs”. Inventiones mathematicae , 153(1):105--143, 2003

    2003

  23. [31]

    Intrinsic metrics on complex manifolds

    Shoshichi Kobayashi. Intrinsic metrics on complex manifolds. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. , 73(6):347--349, 1967

    1967

  24. [32]

    Invariant distances on complex manifolds and holomorphic mappings

    Shoshichi Kobayashi. Invariant distances on complex manifolds and holomorphic mappings. Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan , 19(4):460--480, 1967

    1967

  25. [33]

    Some problems on intrinsic distances and measures

    Shoshichi Kobayashi. Some problems on intrinsic distances and measures. In Proceedings of the C. Carath \'e odory International Symposium (Athens, 1973) Greek Math. Soc., Athens , pages 306--317, 1974

    1973

  26. [34]

    Hyperbolic manifolds and holomorphic mappings: an introduction

    Shoshichi Kobayashi. Hyperbolic manifolds and holomorphic mappings: an introduction . World Scientific Publishing Company, 2005

    2005

  27. [35]

    Harmonic F ields in R iemannian M anifolds ( G eneralized P otential T heory)

    Kunihiko Kodaira. Harmonic F ields in R iemannian M anifolds ( G eneralized P otential T heory). Annals of Mathematics , 50(3):587--665, 1949

    1949

  28. [36]

    U ber die uniformisierung beliebiger analytischer kurven. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu G \

    Paul Koebe. \"U ber die uniformisierung beliebiger analytischer kurven. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu G \"o ttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse , 1907:191--210, 1907

    1907

  29. [37]

    Shafarevich maps and A utomorphic forms

    J \'a nos Koll \'a r. Shafarevich maps and A utomorphic forms . Princeton University Press, 1995

    1995

  30. [38]

    Partially hyperbolic compact complex manifolds

    Hisashi Kasuya and Dan Popovici. Partially hyperbolic compact complex manifolds. Revista Matem \'a tica Iberoamericana , 2025

    2025

  31. [39]

    Higher- D egree H olomorphic C ontact S tructures

    Hisashi Kasuya, Dan Popovici, and Luis Ugarte. Higher- D egree H olomorphic C ontact S tructures. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.01447 , 2025

    2025

  32. [40]

    On D eformations of C omplex A nalytic S tructures, III

    K Kodaira and DC Spencer. On D eformations of C omplex A nalytic S tructures, III . S tability T heorems for C omplex S tructures. Annals of Mathematics , 71(1):43--76, 1960

    1960

  33. [41]

    K \"a hler H yperbolic manifolds and C hern number inequalities

    Ping Li. K \"a hler H yperbolic manifolds and C hern number inequalities. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , 372(10):6853--6868, 2019

    2019

  34. [42]

    Strongly G auduchon H yperbolicity and T wo O ther T ypes of H yperbolicity

    Yi Ma. Strongly G auduchon H yperbolicity and T wo O ther T ypes of H yperbolicity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.08830 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    SKT hyperbolic and G auduchon hyperbolic compact complex manifolds

    Samir Marouani. SKT hyperbolic and G auduchon hyperbolic compact complex manifolds. Algebraic and Geometric Methods of Analysis , page 63, 2023

    2023

  36. [44]

    On the existence of special metrics in complex geometry

    ML Michelsohn. On the existence of special metrics in complex geometry. Acta Mathematica , 149(1):261--295, 1982

    1982

  37. [45]

    Holomorphic M orse I nequalities and B ergman kernels , volume 254

    Xiaonan Ma and George Marinescu. Holomorphic M orse I nequalities and B ergman kernels , volume 254. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007

    2007

  38. [46]

    Harmonic forms with values in locally constant hilbert bundles

    N Mok. Harmonic forms with values in locally constant hilbert bundles. In Proceedings of the Conference in honor of J.-P. Kahane (Orsay 1993), in Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications , 1995

    1993

  39. [47]

    Projective manifolds with ample tangent bundles

    Shigefumi Mori. Projective manifolds with ample tangent bundles. Annals of Mathematics , 110(3):593--606, 1979

    1979

  40. [48]

    Threefolds whose canonical bundles are not numerically effective

    Shigefumi Mori. Threefolds whose canonical bundles are not numerically effective. Annals of Mathematics , 116(1):133--176, 1982

    1982

  41. [49]

    Some properties of B alanced H yperbolic compact complex manifolds

    Samir Marouani and Dan Popovici. Some properties of B alanced H yperbolic compact complex manifolds. International Journal of Mathematics , 33(03):2250019, 2022

    2022

  42. [50]

    Balanced H yperbolic and D ivisorially H yperbolic C ompact C omplex M anifolds

    Samir Marouani and Dan Popovici. Balanced H yperbolic and D ivisorially H yperbolic C ompact C omplex M anifolds. Mathematical Research Letters , 30(6):1813--1855, 2023

    2023

  43. [51]

    An algebraic surface with K ample, ( K ^2)= 9 , p_g=q=0

    David Mumford. An algebraic surface with K ample, ( K ^2)= 9 , p_g=q=0 . American Journal of Mathematics , 101(1):233--244, 1979

    1979

  44. [52]

    L^2 A pproaches in S everal C omplex V ariables : D evelopment of O ka-- C artan T heory by L^2 - E stimates for the - O perator

    Takeo Ohsawa. L^2 A pproaches in S everal C omplex V ariables : D evelopment of O ka-- C artan T heory by L^2 - E stimates for the - O perator . Springer, 2015

    2015

  45. [53]

    Sur l'uniformisation des fonctions analytiques

    H Poincar \'e . Sur l'uniformisation des fonctions analytiques. Acta Mathematica , 31:1--63, 1908

    1908

  46. [54]

    Deformation limits of projective manifolds: Hodge numbers and strongly gauduchon metrics

    Dan Popovici. Deformation limits of projective manifolds: Hodge numbers and strongly gauduchon metrics. Inventiones mathematicae , 194:515--534, 2013

    2013

  47. [55]

    Aeppli cohomology classes associated with gauduchon metrics on compact complex manifolds

    Dan Popovici. Aeppli cohomology classes associated with gauduchon metrics on compact complex manifolds. Bulletin de la Soci \'e t \'e Math \'e matique de France , 143(4):763--800, 2015

    2015

  48. [56]

    Non- K \"a hler H odge T heory and D eformations of C omplex S tructures

    Dan Popovici. Non- K \"a hler H odge T heory and D eformations of C omplex S tructures. Book available on the author’s website.[hodge-def. pdf] , 2022

    2022

  49. [57]

    Autour de la cohomologie de B ott- C hern

    Michel Schweitzer. Autour de la cohomologie de B ott- C hern. arXiv preprint arXiv:0709.3528 , 2007

    2007 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Growth of a primitive of a differential form

    Jean-Claude Sikorav. Growth of a primitive of a differential form. Bulletin de la Soci \'e t \'e Math \'e matique de France , 129(2):159--168, 2001

    2001

  51. [59]

    Cycles for the dynamical study of foliated manifolds and complex manifolds

    Dennis Sullivan. Cycles for the dynamical study of foliated manifolds and complex manifolds. Inventiones mathematicae , 36(1):225--255, 1976

    1976

  52. [60]

    Mapping hilbert cube manifolds to anr's: a solution of a conjecture of borsuk

    James E West. Mapping hilbert cube manifolds to anr's: a solution of a conjecture of borsuk. Annals of Mathematics , 106(1):1--18, 1977

    1977

  53. [61]

    Problem section

    Shing Tung Yau. Problem section. In Seminar on differential geometry , volume 102, pages 669--706, 1982

    1982

  54. [62]

    Integrality and arithmeticity of co-compact lattice corresponding to certain complex two-ball quotients of P icard number one

    SAI-KEE YEUNG. Integrality and arithmeticity of co-compact lattice corresponding to certain complex two-ball quotients of P icard number one. Asian Journal of Mathematics , 8(1):107--130, 2004

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.