REVIEW 2 cited by
State-Dependent Conformal Perception Bounds for Neuro-Symbolic Verification of Autonomous Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
It remains a challenge to provide safety guarantees for autonomous systems with neural perception and control. A typical approach obtains symbolic bounds on perception error (e.g., using conformal prediction) and performs verification under these bounds. However, these bounds can lead to drastic conservatism in the resulting end-to-end safety guarantee. This paper proposes an approach to synthesize symbolic perception error bounds that serve as an optimal interface between perception performance and control verification. The key idea is to consider our error bounds to be heteroskedastic with respect to the system's state -- not time like in previous approaches. These bounds can be obtained with two gradient-free optimization algorithms. We demonstrate that our bounds lead to tighter safety guarantees than the state-of-the-art in a case study on a mountain car.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Conformal Safety Shielding for Imperfect-Perception Agents
The paper introduces a conformal prediction-based shield for imperfect-perception agents and proves a global safety bound only for the simpler perfect-perception case.
-
Towards Unified Probabilistic Verification and Validation of Vision-Based Autonomy
A pipeline that turns collected runs of a vision-based controller into an interval MDP, verifies a safety lower bound, and reuses Bayesian conformance to extend the bound to new environments.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.