Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 109 references

Transient narrowband radio bursts from the magnetar 1E 1547.0-5408

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-13 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A magnetar briefly produced 84 narrowband radio bursts phase-aligned with hard X-rays, a possible low-energy version of repeating fast radio bursts.

desk verdict Solid archival detection of 84 narrowband bursts at 8.4 GHz with hard X-ray phase alignment; the closed-field and precession claims are carefully hedged and secondary. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.21450 v2 pith:PLTOXE73 submitted 2026-03-22 astro-ph.HE

Marcus E. Lower , Paul Scholz , Fernando Camilo , David M. Palmer , John E. Reynolds , John M. Sarkissian , Lawrence J. Toomey , George Younes This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords magnetarnarrowbandradioburstsfast1E1547.0-5408paircascadesclosedfieldlineshardX-rayemissionradio-loudmagnetars
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports 84 short, frequency-narrow radio bursts from the Galactic magnetar 1E 1547.0−5408, seen only in a transient profile component that appeared for three days in February 2009, one month after a major outburst. The bursts sat at the same rotational phase as the leading edge of a newly emerged pulsed hard X-ray component and coincided with rapid changes in the magnetar’s apparent magnetic geometry. Most bursts were temporally unresolved at millisecond resolution, lacked clear frequency drifts, and showed fluences and bandwidths that scale roughly like those of repeating fast radio bursts, only far fainter. The authors argue this emission may arise from pair cascades on closed magnetic field lines and could therefore be a low-energy analogue of the repeating-FRB process. If correct, the result supplies a nearby laboratory for the same physics thought to power distant FRBs and helps explain why those sources often lack clear spin periods.

What carries the argument

Phase alignment between the narrowband radio component and the leading edge of the hard X-ray pulse profile, used to argue that both arise from pair cascades along closed magnetic field lines (while still allowing open-field emission).

What would settle it

Higher time- and frequency-resolution radio observations of a future magnetar outburst that either recover clear downward frequency drifts and excess dispersion expected from plasma lensing, or place the narrowband bursts at a clearly different phase from any hard X-ray component.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Eighty-four narrowband radio bursts were confined to a transient pulse-profile component of the magnetar 1E 1547.0−5408 that appeared only between 2009 February 23 and 25. Their rotational phase coincides with the leading edge of an emergent hard (10–33 keV) X-ray pulse, and their spectral widths, durations and energies resemble a scaled-down version of the narrowband bursts seen from repeating fast-radio-burst sources, pointing to a shared, possibly closed-field-line origin.

Load-bearing premise

That the shared rotational phase of the radio bursts and the hard X-ray leading edge means they come from the same closed-field-line region rather than unrelated open-field or caustic emission.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Closed-field radio emission can operate without beaming along open polar-cap field lines, helping explain the absence of clear second-scale periods in repeating FRBs.
  • Narrowband bursts appear only briefly during the declining phase of magnetar outbursts, so targeted high-cadence searches in that window are the most efficient way to catch them.
  • The observed burst fluences, widths and bandwidths form a continuous sequence with those of Galactic magnetar bursts and extragalactic repeating FRBs, supporting a common emission process spanning many orders of magnitude in energy.
  • Cyclical polarimetric changes on a ~6-day timescale, if confirmed as free precession, would strengthen precessing-magnetar models for periodic FRB activity windows.
  • The same magnetospheric conditions that produce hard X-ray spikes may also launch coherent radio bursts, so simultaneous hard X-ray and radio monitoring of magnetars is required.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the bursts are truly closed-field, multi-frequency polarimetry during the next outburst should show Faraday rotation and PA swings distinct from those of the broadband open-field component.
  • A search for microsecond substructure or nanosecond spikes in future detections would test whether the same curvature-radiation or bunching physics operates at FRB energies.
  • The three-day active window and sudden quenching mirror FRB “burst storms,” so magnetar monitoring campaigns should treat the first weeks after an outburst as a high-priority FRB-analogue search window.
  • Plasma-lensing models remain viable; simultaneous baseband voltage data would allow a direct test via excess dispersion and caustic spectral shapes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the detection of 84 narrowband radio bursts from the magnetar 1E 1547.0−5408 in archival Murriyang (Parkes) observations at 8356 MHz, confined to a transient profile component that appeared only between 2009 February 23–25, roughly one month after the 2009 January outburst. The bursts are mostly temporally unresolved at ~1 ms sampling, show diverse polarization, and lack clear downward-drifting substructure. Their appearance coincides with polarimetric changes interpreted via RVM fits and with an emergent pulsed hard X-ray component seen by RXTE; phase-coherent timing places the narrowband radio component on the leading edge of the 10–33 keV profile. The authors argue that the bursts may be a low-energy analogue of repeating FRB emission, possibly from pair cascades on closed field lines (while noting open-field emission remains viable), and discuss free precession, crustal motion, and plasma lensing as secondary interpretations.

Significance. If the detection and characterization hold, this is a high-value archival result: the largest sample of narrowband radio bursts from a magnetar, at the highest frequency yet reported for such emission, and temporally linked to both a hard X-ray component and a short-lived profile feature. Dual-backend confirmation (DFB4 visual inspection plus AFB subband search), scintillation match to the broadband emission, and residual dispersive sweep provide solid evidence that the events are astrophysical. The carefully hedged FRB-analogue framing and the explicit acknowledgment that open-field emission remains valid strengthen the paper. The work supplies a concrete Galactic comparison sample for repeating FRB spectral and temporal properties and motivates targeted high-frequency searches of magnetars during the declining phases of outbursts.

major comments (2)
  1. Discussion and Fig. 4: the load-bearing geometric claim is that phase alignment of the narrowband radio component with the leading edge of the hard (10–33 keV) X-ray profile favors pair cascades on closed field lines. The paper itself correctly notes that open-field emission remains valid and that radio and X-ray cannot share identical field lines (synchrotron absorption). The text should more clearly separate the robust observational fact (phase coincidence) from the interpretive preference, and state what additional observable (e.g., simultaneous multi-frequency radio + hard X-ray, or a measured altitude proxy) would distinguish closed- from open-field origins.
  2. Methods §1.5 and Extended Data Fig. 4: the free-precession interpretation rests on RVM fits to a handful of epochs that show apparent ~6.3 d cyclical variations in α and ϕ0 after a restricted Gaussian prior is imposed on ζ. Large epoch-to-epoch swings and the strong α–ζ degeneracy make the period and the inferred ellipticity (ε ~ 3.8×10−6) fragile. Either (i) demonstrate that the same period appears in the whitened timing residuals (as free precession should modulate spin-down), or (ii) demote free precession to a secondary, explicitly speculative possibility and lead with the more robust polarimetric variability description.
minor comments (6)
  1. Abstract vs. main text: the abstract states the closed-field interpretation more assertively than the Discussion, which correctly hedges that open-field emission remains valid. Align the abstract wording with the Discussion.
  2. Fig. 3 and Methods §1.4: state explicitly how the 5% width and 95% spectral occupancy are defined from the posterior samples, and whether the reported fluences include only the on-pulse window or any residual baseline correction.
  3. Extended Data Table 1: the dual DFB4/AFB burst counts and rates are useful; a short note on why the AFB recovers fewer events (sensitivity and bandwidth) would help the reader.
  4. Methods §1.2: the whitening procedure (harmonically related sinusoids) is standard but should note whether any residual red noise remains that could shift the absolute radio–X-ray phase zero by more than a few degrees.
  5. Several figure panels use non-standard or garbled axis labels in the rendered text (e.g., Fig. 1–4); ensure final production figures have clean, publication-quality labels and units.
  6. Clarify whether any of the six temporally resolved bursts show measurable residual dispersion or frequency-dependent arrival times that could test the plasma-lensing alternative mentioned in the Discussion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: archival detection and descriptive characterization, not a derivation that reduces to its inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an observational detection of 84 narrowband bursts in archival Murriyang (Parkes) DFB4/AFB data, verified by dual-backend coincidence, scintillation match to the broadband component, and residual dispersive sweep. Burst properties (widths, spectral occupancy, fluence) are recovered by iterative Gaussian/shapelet fits that are purely descriptive; they are not used to 'predict' a related quantity that is forced by construction. Phase alignment with the RXTE hard X-ray leading edge is obtained from independent phase-coherent timing (TEMPO2/PINT whitening of RXTE ToAs plus radio cross-correlation), not from a self-referential definition. The closed-field-line interpretation is explicitly hedged ('may indicate... open-field line emission remains valid') and is not presented as a first-principles derivation. Self-citations (e.g. Lower et al. 2023 for the RM and long-term context) supply calibration constants and background, not the burst sample or the load-bearing phase coincidence. Luminosity uses an external distance (4.5 kpc). No uniqueness theorem, ansatz smuggled via self-citation, or fitted parameter renamed as prediction appears. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external data and does not reduce to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The detection itself rests on standard radio/X-ray reduction assumptions. Interpretive claims (closed-field origin, FRB analogue, free precession) rest on geometric and emission-region axioms plus a few fitted scales (distance, precession period, restricted ζ prior). No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Source distance = 4.5 kpc
    Pseudo-luminosity L_ν uses the nominal 4.5 kpc distance from Tiengo et al. 2010; changes rescale all energetics vs FRBs.
  • Apparent precession period = 6.3 ± 0.1 d
    Cyclical variation in RVM α, Ψ0, ϕ0 is fit as 6.3±0.1 d over a short baseline and used to infer ellipticity ε~3.8e-6.
  • Restricted viewing-angle prior ζ = N(7.5°, 2.9°)
    Second RVM fit uses Gaussian prior N(7.5°, 2.9°) from a 2025 polarimetry study to suppress unphysical ζ swings; recovered α/ϕ0 trends depend on this choice.
  • Dispersion measure and rotation measure = DM 697 pc cm^-3; RM -1847.6 rad m^-2
    Dedispersion at DM=697 pc cm^-3 and Faraday correction RM=-1847.6 rad m^-2 fix burst arrival times and PA; taken from prior work on this source.
  • Shapelet order and on-pulse windows = N_s typically 5; windows refined iteratively
    Spectral occupancy and fluence depend on number of shapelet components (typically 5) and eye-then-refined on-pulse windows; affects Fig. 3 distributions.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Rotating-vector model for a dipolar magnetic field relates PA swing to α, ζ, ϕ0.
    Used throughout Methods §1.5 and Extended Data Fig. 4 to claim geometry changes and possible free precession.
  • domain assumption Hard X-ray pulsed emission in magnetars arises in the closed-field region (resonant Compton or pair-cascade synchrotron).
    Invoked in Discussion to interpret radio–X-ray phase alignment as closed-field radio origin.
  • ad hoc to paper Phase coincidence of radio and hard X-ray components implies shared magnetic longitude (though not identical altitude/field lines).
    Central interpretive step in Discussion and Fig. 4; open-field alternatives are noted but not quantitatively ruled out.
  • domain assumption Narrow spectral occupancy plus short duration and FRB-like rates imply a shared emission mechanism scaled in energy.
    Underpins the 'low-energy FRB analogue' claim; bandwidth/duration similarity is empirical, mechanism identity is assumed.
  • standard math Standard barycentric correction, Poisson burst flagging, and Gaussian/shapelet likelihoods adequately describe the data.
    Methods §§1.1–1.4; conventional for RXTE and pulsar fold-mode analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transient narrowband radio bursts from the magnetar 1E 1547.0-5408." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PLTOXE73

@misc{pith2026260321450,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transient narrowband radio bursts from the magnetar 1E 1547.0-5408},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PLTOXE73}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.21450}
}
read the original abstract

Radio-loud magnetars are well known for exhibiting radiative behaviors that are seldom seen among the wider pulsar population. Yet one form of emission that remains elusive among pulsars and magnetars is narrowband bursts of radio waves. Such emission is a hallmark of repeating sources of fast radio bursts (FRBs), intense radio flashes that originate from distant galaxies. Here, we report the detection of 84 narrowband radio bursts during observations of the magnetar 1E 1547.0-5408 by the Murriyang telescope. They were confined to a transient profile component that appeared between 2009 February 23 to 25, one month after its 2009 outburst. Their appearance coincided with both dramatic changes in the magnetar line-of-sight magnetic-field geometry, and an emergent pulsed hard X-ray component detected by the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer. The leading edge of the hard X-ray emission was phase-aligned with the narrowband component. This may indicate the bursts originated from pair cascades along closed field lines, though open-field line emission remains valid. Our characterization of the bursts suggests they may represent a low-energy analogue of the repeating FRB mechanism, further linking FRB progenitors to young, highly magnetized neutron stars.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Duncan, R. C. & Thompson, C. Formation of very strongly magnetized neutron stars - Implications for gamma-ray bursts.Astrophys. J. Lett.392, L9–L13 (1992)

    1992

  2. [2]

    GB 790305 as a Very Strongly Magnetized Neutron Star.Acta Astronomica42, 145–153 (1992)

    Paczynski, B. GB 790305 as a Very Strongly Magnetized Neutron Star.Acta Astronomica42, 145–153 (1992)

    1992

  3. [3]

    The discovery and scientific potential of fast radio bursts.Science 378, abj3043 (2022)

    Bailes, M. The discovery and scientific potential of fast radio bursts.Science 378, abj3043 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    The physics of fast radio bursts.Reviews of Modern Physics95, 035005 (2023)

    Zhang, B. The physics of fast radio bursts.Reviews of Modern Physics95, 035005 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    CHIME/FRB Collaborationet al.A bright millisecond-duration radio burst from a Galactic magnetar.Nature587, 54–58 (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    D.et al.A fast radio burst associated with a Galactic magnetar

    Bochenek, C. D.et al.A fast radio burst associated with a Galactic magnetar. Nature587, 59–62 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    CHIME/FRB Collaborationet al.CHIME/FRB Discovery of Eight New Repeating Fast Radio Burst Sources.Astrophys. J. Lett.885, L24 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    Fonseca, E.et al.Nine New Repeating Fast Radio Burst Sources from CHIME/FRB.Astrophys. J. Lett.891, L6 (2020)

    2020

Show all 109 references
  1. [9]

    Camilo, F.et al.Transient pulsed radio emission from a magnetar.Nature442, 892–895 (2006)

    2006

  2. [10]

    7 Astrophys

    Torne, P.et al.Submillimeter Pulsations from the Magnetar XTE J1810-197. 7 Astrophys. J. Lett.925, L17 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    P., Chandra Joshi, B

    Maan, Y., Surnis, M. P., Chandra Joshi, B. & Bagchi, M. Magnetar XTE J1810- 197: Spectro-temporal Evolution of Average Radio Emission.Astrophys. J.931, 67 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Zhu, W.et al.A radio pulsar phase from SGR J1935+2154 provides clues to the magnetar FRB mechanism.Science Advances9, eadf6198 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    Wang, P.et al.X-Ray Hardening Preceding the Onset of SGR 1935+2154’s Radio Pulsar Phase.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.275, 39 (2024)

    1935

  6. [14]

    & Lin, H.-H

    Thulasiram, P. & Lin, H.-H. Narrow-band giant pulses from the Crab pulsar. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.508, 1947–1953 (2021)

    1947

  7. [15]

    Giant pulse characteristics of PSR J0540-6919.Mon

    Geyer, M.et al.The Thousand-Pulsar-Array programme on MeerKAT - III. Giant pulse characteristics of PSR J0540-6919.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.505, 4468–4482 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    M., Halpern, J

    Camilo, F., Ransom, S. M., Halpern, J. P. & Reynolds, J. 1E 1547.0-5408: A Radio-emitting Magnetar with a Rotation Period of 2 Seconds.Astrophys. J. Lett.666, L93–L96 (2007)

    2007

  9. [17]

    L.et al.The 2008 October Swift detection of X-ray bursts/outburst from the transient SGR-like AXP 1E1547.0-5408.Mon

    Israel, G. L.et al.The 2008 October Swift detection of X-ray bursts/outburst from the transient SGR-like AXP 1E1547.0-5408.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 408, 1387–1395 (2010)

    2008

  10. [18]

    & Astrophys.529, A19 (2011)

    Bernardini, F.et al.Multi-instrument X-ray monitoring of the January 2009 outburst from the recurrent magnetar candidate 1E 1547.0-5408.Astron. & Astrophys.529, A19 (2011)

    2009

  11. [19]

    Mereghetti, S.et al.Strong Bursts from the Anomalous X-Ray Pulsar 1E 1547.0- 5408 Observed with the INTEGRAL/SPI Anti-Coincidence Shield.Astrophys. J. Lett.696, L74–L78 (2009)

    2009

  12. [20]

    J.710, 1335–1342 (2010)

    Kaneko, Y.et al.Magnetar Twists: Fermi/Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor Detection of SGR J1550-5418.Astrophys. J.710, 1335–1342 (2010)

    2010

  13. [21]

    & Walter, R

    Savchenko, V., Neronov, A., Beckmann, V., Produit, N. & Walter, R. SGR- like flaring activity of the anomalous X-ray pulsar 1E 1547.0-5408.Astron. & Astrophys.510, A77 (2010)

    2010

  14. [22]

    J.et al.SGR J1550-5418 Bursts Detected with the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor during its Most Prolific Activity.Astrophys

    van der Horst, A. J.et al.SGR J1550-5418 Bursts Detected with the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor during its Most Prolific Activity.Astrophys. J.749, 122 (2012)

    2012

  15. [23]

    & Kaspi, V

    Scholz, P. & Kaspi, V. M. The 2009 Outburst of Magnetar 1E 1547-5408: Persistent Radiative and Burst Properties.Astrophys. J.739, 94 (2011). 8

    2009

  16. [24]

    Enoto, T.et al.Suzaku Discovery of a Hard X-Ray Tail in the Persistent Spectra from the Magnetar 1E 1547.0-5408 during its 2009 Activity.Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn62, 475 (2010)

    2009

  17. [25]

    M., Scholz, P

    Dib, R., Kaspi, V. M., Scholz, P. & Gavriil, F. P. RXTE Observations of Anoma- lous X-Ray Pulsar 1E 1547.0-5408 during and after its 2008 and 2009 Outbursts. Astrophys. J.748, 3 (2012)

    2008

  18. [26]

    Kuiper, L., Hermsen, W., den Hartog, P. R. & Urama, J. O. Temporal and Spectral Evolution in X- andγ-Rays of Magnetar 1E 1547.0-5408 since its 2008 October Outburst: The Discovery of a Transient Hard Pulsed Component after its 2009 January Outburst.Astrophys. J.748, 133 (2012)

    2008

  19. [27]

    E.et al.The 2022 High-energy Outburst and Radio Disappearing Act of the Magnetar 1E 1547.0-5408.Astrophys

    Lower, M. E.et al.The 2022 High-energy Outburst and Radio Disappearing Act of the Magnetar 1E 1547.0-5408.Astrophys. J.945, 153 (2023)

    2022

  20. [28]

    L.et al.X-Ray and Radio Bursts from the Magnetar 1E 1547.0-5408

    Israel, G. L.et al.X-Ray and Radio Bursts from the Magnetar 1E 1547.0-5408. Astrophys. J.907, 7 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Camilo, F., Reynolds, J., Johnston, S., Halpern, J. P. & Ransom, S. M. The Mag- netar 1E 1547.0-5408: Radio Spectrum, Polarimetry, and Timing.Astrophys. J. 679, 681–686 (2008)

    2008

  22. [30]

    P., Gotthelf, E

    Halpern, J. P., Gotthelf, E. V., Reynolds, J., Ransom, S. M. & Camilo, F. Outburst of the 2 s Anomalous X-Ray Pulsar 1E 1547.0-5408.Astrophys. J. 676, 1178–1183 (2008)

    2008

  23. [31]

    Jahoda, K.et al.Siegmund, O. H. & Gummin, M. A. (eds)In-orbit perfor- mance and calibration of the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) Proportional Counter Array (PCA). (eds Siegmund, O. H. & Gummin, M. A.)EUV, X- Ray, and Gamma-Ray Instrumentation for Astronomy VII, Vol. 2808 ...

    1996

  24. [32]

    W., Jessner, A., Lyne, A

    Kramer, M., Stappers, B. W., Jessner, A., Lyne, A. G. & Jordan, C. A. Polarized radio emission from a magnetar.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.377, 107–119 (2007)

    2007

  25. [33]

    J.841, 126 (2017)

    Scholz, P.et al.Spin-down Evolution and Radio Disappearance of the Magnetar PSR J1622-4950.Astrophys. J.841, 126 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    E., Johnston, S., Shannon, R

    Lower, M. E., Johnston, S., Shannon, R. M., Bailes, M. & Camilo, F. The dynamic magnetosphere of Swift J1818.0-1607.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.502, 127–139 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    & Cooke, D

    Radhakrishnan, V. & Cooke, D. J. Magnetic Poles and the Polarization Structure of Pulsar Radiation.Astrophy. Lett.3, 225 (1969). 9

    1969

  28. [36]

    V., Pennucci, T

    Bilous, A. V., Pennucci, T. T., Demorest, P. & Ransom, S. M. A Broadband Radio Study of the Average Profile and Giant Pulses from PSR B1821-24A. Astrophys. J.803, 83 (2015)

    2015

  29. [37]

    H., Eilek, J

    Hankins, T. H., Eilek, J. A. & Jones, G. The Crab Pulsar at Centimeter Wavelengths. II. Single Pulses.Astrophys. J.833, 47 (2016)

    2016

  30. [38]

    & van Kerkwijk, M

    Mahajan, N. & van Kerkwijk, M. H. Intrinsic Emission of PSR B1937+21 at 327 MHz.Astrophys. J.967, 34 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Younes, G.et al.Magnetar spin-down glitch clearing the way for FRB-like bursts and a pulsed radio episode.Nature Astronomy7, 339–350 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Giri, U.et al.Comprehensive Bayesian analysis of FRB-like bursts from SGR 1935+2154 observed by CHIME/FRB.arXiv e-printsarXiv:2310.16932 (2023)

    1935 arXiv

  33. [41]

    J.893, 46 (2020)

    von Kienlin, A.et al.The Fourth Fermi-GBM Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog: A Decade of Data.Astrophys. J.893, 46 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Younes, G.et al.NICER View of the 2020 Burst Storm and Persistent Emission of SGR 1935+2154.Astrophys. J. Lett.904, L21 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    Borghese, A.et al.The first seven months of the 2020 X-ray outburst of the magnetar SGR J1935+2154.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.516, 602–616 (2022)

    2020

  36. [44]

    Hu, C.-P.et al.Rapid spin changes around a magnetar fast radio burst.Nature 626, 500–504 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Beloborodov, A. M. Untwisting Magnetospheres of Neutron Stars.Astrophys. J.703, 1044–1060 (2009)

    2009

  38. [46]

    Szary, A., Melikidze, G. I. & Gil, J. On the Origin of Radio Emission from Magnetars.Astrophys. J.800, 76 (2015)

    2015

  39. [47]

    Zeng, S., Philippov, A., Juno, J., Beloborodov, A. M. & Popova, E. Origin of Pulsed Radio Emission from Magnetars.Astrophys. J. Lett.996, L20 (2026)

    2026

  40. [48]

    Baring, M. G. & Harding, A. K. Resonant Compton upscattering in anomalous X-ray pulsars.Astrophys. Space Sci.308, 109–118 (2007)

    2007

  41. [49]

    & Thompson, C

    Fern´ andez, R. & Thompson, C. Resonant Cyclotron Scattering in Three Dimen- sions and the Quiescent Nonthermal X-ray Emission of Magnetars.Astrophys. J.660, 615–640 (2007)

    2007

  42. [50]

    Beloborodov, A. M. On the Mechanism of Hard X-Ray Emission from Magnetars.Astrophys. J.762, 13 (2013)

    2013

  43. [51]

    G., Gonthier, P

    Wadiasingh, Z., Baring, M. G., Gonthier, P. L. & Harding, A. K. Resonant 10 Inverse Compton Scattering Spectra from Highly Magnetized Neutron Stars. Astrophys. J.854, 98 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    Baring, M. G. & Harding, A. K. Photon Splitting and Pair Creation in Highly Magnetized Pulsars.Astrophys. J.547, 929–948 (2001)

    2001

  45. [53]

    K., Wadiasingh, Z

    Harding, A. K., Wadiasingh, Z. & Baring, M. G. Pair Cascades in Magnetar Magnetospheres.Astrophys. J.991, 178 (2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    Romani, R. W. & Yadigaroglu, I.-A. Gamma-Ray Pulsars: Emission Zones and Viewing Geometries.Astrophys. J.438, 314 (1995)

    1995

  47. [55]

    Dyks, J., Harding, A. K. & Rudak, B. Relativistic Effects and Polarization in Three High-Energy Pulsar Models.Astrophys. J.606, 1125–1142 (2004)

    2004

  48. [56]

    J.744, 33 (2012)

    Guillemot, L.et al.Pulsed Gamma Rays from the Original Millisecond and Black Widow Pulsars: A Case for Caustic Radio Emission?Astrophys. J.744, 33 (2012)

    2012

  49. [57]

    Venter, C., Johnson, T. J. & Harding, A. K. Modeling Phase-aligned Gamma- Ray and Radio Millisecond Pulsar Light Curves.Astrophys. J.744, 34 (2012)

    2012

  50. [58]

    Li, D.et al.A bimodal burst energy distribution of a repeating fast radio burst source.Nature598, 267–271 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    J.710, 227–235 (2010)

    Tiengo, A.et al.The Dust-scattering X-ray Rings of the Anomalous X-ray Pulsar 1E 1547.0-5408.Astrophys. J.710, 227–235 (2010)

    2010

  52. [60]

    Nimmo, K.et al.A burst storm from the repeating FRB 20200120E in an M81 globular cluster.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.520, 2281–2305 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    Kirsten, F.et al.Detection of two bright radio bursts from magnetar SGR 1935 + 2154.Nature Astronomy5, 414–422 (2021)

    1935

  54. [62]

    Luo, R.et al.Diverse polarization angle swings from a repeating fast radio burst source.Nature586, 693–696 (2020)

    2020

  55. [63]

    Astrophys

    Gajjar, V.et al.Highest Frequency Detection of FRB 121102 at 4-8 GHz Using the Breakthrough Listen Digital Backend at the Green Bank Telescope. Astrophys. J.863, 2 (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    Limaye, P.et al.A broadband study of FRB20240114A with the Effelsberg 100-m radio telescope.arXiv e-printsarXiv:2510.08367 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Nimmo, K.et al.Highly polarized microstructure from the repeating FRB 20180916B.Nature Astronomy5, 594–603 (2021)

    2021

  58. [66]

    M.et al.Dense forests of microshots in bursts from FRB 20220912A

    Hewitt, D. M.et al.Dense forests of microshots in bursts from FRB 20220912A. 11 Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.526, 2039–2057 (2023)

  59. [67]

    P.et al.Detection of ultra-fast radio bursts from FRB 20121102A

    Snelders, M. P.et al.Detection of ultra-fast radio bursts from FRB 20121102A. Nature Astronomy7, 1486–1496 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    A., Rajabi, F., Kumar, A

    Chamma, M. A., Rajabi, F., Kumar, A. & Houde, M. A broad survey of spectro- temporal properties from FRB 20121102A.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.522, 3036–3048 (2023)

    2023

  61. [69]

    M.et al.Arecibo observations of a burst storm from FRB 20121102A in 2016.Mon

    Hewitt, D. M.et al.Arecibo observations of a burst storm from FRB 20121102A in 2016.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.515, 3577–3596 (2022)

    2016

  62. [70]

    C.et al.A Nan¸ cay Radio Telescope study of the hyperactive repeating FRB 20220912A.Mon

    Konijn, D. C.et al.A Nan¸ cay Radio Telescope study of the hyperactive repeating FRB 20220912A.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.534, 3331–3348 (2024)

    2024

  63. [71]

    V.et al.An activity transition in FRB 20201124A: Methodological rigor, detection of frequency-dependent cessation, and a geometric magnetar model.Astron

    Bilous, A. V.et al.An activity transition in FRB 20201124A: Methodological rigor, detection of frequency-dependent cessation, and a geometric magnetar model.Astron. & Astrophys.696, A194 (2025)

    2025

  64. [72]

    J.997, 334 (2026)

    Shin, K.et al.CHIME/FRB Discovery of the Extremely Active Fast Radio Burst Source FRB 20240114A.Astrophys. J.997, 334 (2026)

    2026

  65. [73]

    Shaji, K.et al.FRB 20240619D: a study of the hyperactivity, rotation measure evolution, and searches for a persistent radio source.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 545, staf2222 (2026)

    2026

  66. [74]

    Xu, H.et al.A fast radio burst source at a complex magnetized site in a barred galaxy.Nature609, 685–688 (2022)

    2022

  67. [75]

    J.et al.FAST Observations of an Extremely Active Episode of FRB 20201124A: I

    Zhou, D. J.et al.FAST Observations of an Extremely Active Episode of FRB 20201124A: I. Burst Morphology.Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics22, 124001 (2022)

    2022

  68. [76]

    M.et al.Lensing of Fast Radio Bursts by Plasma Structures in Host Galaxies.Astrophys

    Cordes, J. M.et al.Lensing of Fast Radio Bursts by Plasma Structures in Host Galaxies.Astrophys. J.842, 35 (2017)

    2017

  69. [77]

    & Zhang, B

    Wang, W.-Y., Yang, Y.-P., Niu, C.-H., Xu, R. & Zhang, B. Magnetospheric Curvature Radiation by Bunches as Emission Mechanism for Repeating Fast Radio Bursts.Astrophys. J.927, 105 (2022)

    2022

  70. [78]

    & Wang, F.-Y

    Li, R.-N., Wang, Y.-B., Yi, S.-X., Zhou, X. & Wang, F.-Y. The Role of Plasma Lensing in Fast Radio Bursts.Astrophys. J.998, 127 (2026)

    2026

  71. [79]

    Nature Astronomy8, 617–627 (2024)

    Desvignes, G.et al.A freely precessing magnetar following an X-ray outburst. Nature Astronomy8, 617–627 (2024)

    2024

  72. [80]

    Gao, Y.et al.Precession of magnetars: dynamical evolutions and modulations on polarized electromagnetic waves.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.519, 1080–1097 12 (2023)

    2023

  73. [81]

    Levin, Y., Beloborodov, A. M. & Bransgrove, A. Precessing Flaring Magnetar as a Source of Repeating FRB 180916.J0158+65.Astrophys. J. Lett.895, L30 (2020)

    2020

  74. [82]

    & Zanazzi, J

    Li, D. & Zanazzi, J. J. Emission Properties of Periodic Fast Radio Bursts from the Motion of Magnetars: Testing Dynamical Models.Astrophys. J. Lett.909, L25 (2021)

    2021

  75. [83]

    M.et al.Possible periodic activity in the repeating FRB 121102

    Rajwade, K. M.et al.Possible periodic activity in the repeating FRB 121102. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.495, 3551–3558 (2020)

    2020

  76. [84]

    Johnson-McDaniel, N. K. & Owen, B. J. Maximum elastic deformations of relativistic stars.Phys. Rev. D88, 044004 (2013)

    2013

  77. [85]

    & Andersson, N

    Haskell, B., Samuelsson, L., Glampedakis, K. & Andersson, N. Modelling mag- netically deformed neutron stars.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.385, 531–542 (2008)

    2008

  78. [86]

    Jones, P. B. Nature of Fault Planes in Solid Neutron Star Matter.Astrophys. J.595, 342–345 (2003)

    2003

  79. [87]

    Magnetar activity mediated by plastic deformations of neutron star crust.Mon

    Lyutikov, M. Magnetar activity mediated by plastic deformations of neutron star crust.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.447, 1407–1417 (2015)

    2015

  80. [88]

    Younes, G.et al.Pulse Peak Migration during the Outburst Decay of the Magne- tar SGR 1830-0645: Crustal Motion and Magnetospheric Untwisting.Astrophys. J. Lett.924, L27 (2022)

    2022

  81. [89]

    J.989, 89 (2025)

    Younes, G.et al.Timing and Spectral Evolution of the Magnetar 1E 1841-045 in Outburst.Astrophys. J.989, 89 (2025)

    2025

  82. [90]

    & Oswald, L

    Ben´ aˇ cek, J., Jessner, A., Pohl, M., Rievajov´ a, T. & Oswald, L. S. On the origin of radio polarization in pulsar polar caps.arXiv e-printsarXiv:2503.17249 (2025)

    2025

  83. [91]

    Granet, C.et al.The designing, manufacturing, and testing of a dual-band feed system for the parkes radio telescope.IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine47, 13–19 (2005)

    2005

  84. [92]

    W., van Straten, W

    Hotan, A. W., van Straten, W. & Manchester, R. N. PSRCHIVE and PSRFITS: An Open Approach to Radio Pulsar Data Storage and Analysis.Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust.21, 302–309 (2004)

    2004

  85. [93]

    & Oslowski, S

    van Straten, W., Demorest, P. & Oslowski, S. Pulsar Data Analysis with PSRCHIVE.Astronomical Research and Technology9, 237–256 (2012)

    2012

  86. [94]

    & Willett, K

    Johnston, S., Karastergiou, A. & Willett, K. High-frequency observations of 13 southern pulsars.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.369, 1916–1928 (2006)

    1916

  87. [95]

    N.et al.The Parkes multi-beam pulsar survey - I

    Manchester, R. N.et al.The Parkes multi-beam pulsar survey - I. Observing and data analysis systems, discovery and timing of 100 pulsars.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.328, 17–35 (2001)

    2001

  88. [96]

    & Bailes, M

    van Straten, W. & Bailes, M. DSPSR: Digital Signal Processing Software for Pulsar Astronomy.Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia28, 1–14 (2011)

    2011

  89. [97]

    Gelfand, J. D. & Gaensler, B. M. The Compact X-Ray Source 1E 1547.0- 5408 and the Radio Shell G327.24-0.13: A New Proposed Association between a Candidate Magnetar and a Candidate Supernova Remnant.Astrophys. J.667, 1111–1118 (2007)

    2007

  90. [98]

    J.761, 66 (2012)

    Scholz, P.et al.Post-outburst X-Ray Flux and Timing Evolution of Swift J1822.3-1606.Astrophys. J.761, 66 (2012)

    2012

  91. [99]

    B., Edwards, R

    Hobbs, G. B., Edwards, R. T. & Manchester, R. N. TEMPO2, a new pulsar- timing package - I. An overview.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.369, 655–672 (2006)

    2006

  92. [100]

    G., Kramer, M., Martin, C

    Hobbs, G., Lyne, A. G., Kramer, M., Martin, C. E. & Jordan, C. Long-term timing observations of 374 pulsars.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.353, 1311–1344 (2004)

    2004

  93. [101]

    J.911, 45 (2021)

    Luo, J.et al.PINT: A Modern Software Package for Pulsar Timing.Astrophys. J.911, 45 (2021)

    2021

  94. [102]

    Ashton, G.et al.BILBY: A User-friendly Bayesian Inference Library for Gravitational-wave Astronomy.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.241, 27 (2019)

    2019

  95. [103]

    Speagle, J. S. DYNESTY: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.493, 3132–3158 (2020)

    2020

  96. [104]

    Shapelets - I

    Refregier, A. Shapelets - I. A method for image analysis.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.338, 35–47 (2003)

    2003

  97. [105]

    E.et al.Evidence of magnetospheric vacuum birefringence in the polarized X-rays of a radio magnetar.arXiv e-printsarXiv:2509.19446 (2025)

    Stewart, R. E.et al.Evidence of magnetospheric vacuum birefringence in the polarized X-rays of a radio magnetar.arXiv e-printsarXiv:2509.19446 (2025)

    2025

  98. [106]

    Manchester, D.et al.Parkes observations for project p456 semester 2008octs. v2. https://doi.org/10.4225/08/5214B1AFAB88D (2011)

    2011 doi

  99. [107]

    Camilo, F.et al.Parkes observations for project p602 semester 2008octs 01. v1. https://doi.org/10.25919/z20e-zv64 (2025). 14

    2025 doi

  100. [108]

    Camilo, F.et al.Parkes observations for project p602 semester 2008octs. v2. https://doi.org/10.4225/08/522913CCAA483 (2011)

    2011 doi

  101. [109]

    Parkes pulsar observations with undefined project ids for 2009

    CSIRO. Parkes pulsar observations with undefined project ids for 2009. v2. https://doi.org/10.4225/08/5801585253150 (2013). 15 � �� ��� �� � � �� ��� � ��� ��� ��� ��� ���� ������� ���� ��� ������������������� ���� ��� �� � � ��� � �� � �� � �� � �� � �� �� ����� ��������� ���...

    2009 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.