Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Unveiling Scoring Processes: Dissecting the Differences between LLMs and Human Graders in Automatic Scoring

As of 19 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 5 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2407.18328.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2407.18328 v2

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 5 of 5 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00

measured 5 of 5 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-16T11:38:28.510313Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-05-20T06:13:22.538943Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact0
  • verified fuzzy0
  • unresolved0
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation acb9f647-5f37-4486-b42a-5133c87c03a1 · inbound

Human-Centered Design for AI-based Automatically Generated Assessment Reports: A Systematic Review cites this paper.

Human-Centered Design for AI-based Automatically Generated Assessment Reports: A Systematic Review Unveiling Scoring Processes: Dissecting the Differences between LLMs and Human Graders in Automatic Scoring

Reference 52

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-10T23:06:54.237679Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-10T23:06:54.237679Z digest=sha256:fa53ff78852c648b66c55ae0a9c7a221a4870e2b993fc5e623cf44a3ead562fa

Observation 69456272-5104-4a11-a45f-c5160a1c83af · inbound

Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish: On the Extended Reading Articles Generation with LLMs cites this paper.

Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish: On the Extended Reading Articles Generation with LLMs Unveiling Scoring Processes: Dissecting the Differences between LLMs and Human Graders in Automatic Scoring

Reference 13

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T11:38:28.510313Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-16T11:38:28.510313Z digest=sha256:82641d382b0b2816bb936f901b68b4898a79e2082809a340269d161379ee093f

Observation ea08a39c-7554-4e6b-b149-3a629884f96f · inbound

CAFES: A Collaborative Multi-Agent Framework for Multi-Granular Multimodal Essay Scoring cites this paper.

CAFES: A Collaborative Multi-Agent Framework for Multi-Granular Multimodal Essay Scoring Unveiling Scoring Processes: Dissecting the Differences between LLMs and Human Graders in Automatic Scoring

Reference 66

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T15:42:37.158071Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-07T15:42:37.158071Z digest=sha256:b801a2281edb9e43f617065e2083f7a8c80f40790acc1bbeeece503972e63c49

Observation 1d46e447-8b09-43f2-9460-acdd1ca89023 · inbound

Exploring LLM-Generated Feedback for Economics Essays: How Teaching Assistants Evaluate and Envision Its Use cites this paper.

Exploring LLM-Generated Feedback for Economics Essays: How Teaching Assistants Evaluate and Envision Its Use Unveiling Scoring Processes: Dissecting the Differences between LLMs and Human Graders in Automatic Scoring

Reference 31

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T15:16:02.389542Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T15:16:02.389542Z digest=sha256:b2eb3118b86a3a99088e29a347db1c8b5d4c8306b4d6dc6e512530c02a859156

Observation a9595a87-ff45-436f-b41e-51bfe795fca2 · inbound

Generative-Evaluative Agreement: A Necessary Validity Criterion for LLM-Enabled Adaptive Assessment cites this paper.

Generative-Evaluative Agreement: A Necessary Validity Criterion for LLM-Enabled Adaptive Assessment Unveiling Scoring Processes: Dissecting the Differences between LLMs and Human Graders in Automatic Scoring

Reference 6

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-20T06:13:22.542404Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-20T06:13:06.598618Z digest=sha256:c44a01b1105296f2bf409fa185eb0cefe81735e8bb2e6d291a2d6ef6d4bcc6d4