Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 35 references

EH from V2X Communications: the Price of Uncertainty and the Impact of Platooning

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Roadside sensors can harvest V2X radio energy using only local topology, and regular traffic such as platooning raises their delivered throughput by more than 30% over random traffic of equal density.

desk verdict A competent first analytical model of roadside RF harvesting from V2X traffic, with clean math and honest simulation checks, but the headline throughput and platooning-gain numbers depend on a continuous-transmission idealization and a comparison that is not actually same-intensity. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.01502 v1 pith:PMZ7Z3HP submitted 2024-12-02 cs.NI eess.SP

Federico Librino , Paolo Santi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.NIeess.SP
keywords VehicularcommunicationsEnergyharvestingRFV2XPlatooningThroughputoptimizationBlackoutprobabilityWireless
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Roadside sensors could be powered by the radio energy that passing vehicles already emit, and this paper asks how much data such a sensor can deliver when it knows the local traffic pattern but not its own battery level. The proposed strategy alternates harvest and transmit phases in cycles triggered by the closest vehicle crossing a tunable distance threshold, and the authors derive the optimal threshold and the resulting throughput analytically by modeling the battery as a Markov chain and the traffic as a renewal process. Their central quantitative claim is that regular spacing of vehicles, as in platooning, raises the delivered throughput by more than 30% and the energy efficiency by more than 55% relative to random arrival traffic with the same average vehicle density. They also derive the blackout probability, exposing a tunable tradeoff: settings that maximize throughput can leave a blackout probability around 5%, while stricter reliability costs about 20% of throughput. If the analysis holds, roadside energy-harvesting devices need no battery telemetry, only beacon-based topology knowledge, to operate near their performance limit.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the cycle-based threshold strategy: time is divided into cycles, a harvest phase begins when the closest vehicle enters a segment of length $2\ell$ centered at the device's projection on the road and lasts while that vehicle crosses it, and a transmit phase follows until the next vehicle arrives. The only tunable parameter is the harvest distance $\ell$, which trades longer recharging against fewer transmission slots. The analytic engine is the renewal-reward representation $\Theta = E[W_q]/E[Z_q]$, with reward $W_q$ the number of packets deliverable in a cycle and holding time $Z_q$ the inter-vehicle time, together with a discrete-state Markov chain for the battery whose steady state gives the distribution of initial charge in each cycle. The distribution of per-cycle harvested energy, a weighted sum of noncentral chi-square variables under Rician fading, is made computable through a saddle-point approximation of its cumulant generating function, and this is what turns the whole throughput expression into a tractable formula.

What would settle it

Measure the average radio power received 5 m from a road lane while vehicles transmit 802.11p beacons at their actual duty cycle, and compare the per-cycle harvested energy with the model prediction based on continuous transmission at $100$ mW; if the measured value is an order of magnitude lower, the claimed throughput and the 30% platooning gain will not transfer to real deployments.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that an energy-harvesting device placed beside a road can use a threshold policy—harvest whenever the closest vehicle is within a distance $\ell$ of the device's projection onto the road, transmit otherwise—and that the optimal $\ell$ can be computed from the inter-vehicle distance distribution, fading statistics, battery capacity, and transmit power. The theoretical throughput expression, obtained by treating each vehicle passage as a renewal-reward cycle and the battery level as a discrete-state Markov chain, matches simulation results across the parameter ranges tested. The key comparative result is the price of uncertainty: when vehicle arrivals are random, the device must overprovision energy to survive long gaps between vehicles, which wastes energy through battery overflow when vehicles are close; with fixed inter-vehicle distance, the same average density yields at least 30% more throughput and more than 55% higher energy efficiency. For the fixed-spacing case the paper also derives a blackout probability, showing that the parameter choices maximizing throughput produce a blackout probability near 5%, while guaranteeing a $10^{-3}$ blackout probability costs roughly 20% of throughput.

Load-bearing premise

The whole analysis assumes every vehicle transmits continuously at a fixed power on its own channel, so the radio energy arriving at the roadside device is steady; real V2X radios transmit mostly in short bursts, which could lower the harvestable energy considerably and shrink the platooning gain.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A roadside energy-harvesting device can approach optimal throughput with no battery-status feedback, relying only on beacon-derived positions and channels of nearby vehicles.
  • With regularly spaced vehicles, throughput stays between 13 and 14 kbit/s across a wide range of inter-vehicle distances when the harvest distance and transmit power are tuned.
  • The parameters that maximize throughput (larger $\ell$ and higher transmit power) push blackout probability to about 0.05 at 4 kbit packets, while a $10^{-3}$ blackout probability requires lowering transmit power and costs about 20% of throughput.
  • Rician fading with a strong line-of-sight component improves throughput over Rayleigh fading only when the average harvested energy is near battery capacity; at small harvest distances Rayleigh fading can lower blackout probability because its larger variance occasionally produces energy spikes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The continuous-transmission assumption means the paper's throughput figures are an upper envelope for real beacon-based V2X traffic; a direct extension is to re-derive the cycle-based formulas with a per-vehicle transmission probability, which the authors mention in a footnote but do not quantify.
  • The blackout-probability expression naturally supports an Age-of-Information-constrained design rule: choose the smallest harvest distance and transmit power that keep blackout probability below an application threshold, an optimization the paper does not formulate.
  • Because the model rewards lower variance in inter-vehicle distance, any traffic-management scheme that smooths spacing, such as coordinated intersection scheduling, should increase the energy available to roadside devices; the framework could be used to quantify that side benefit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies a roadside energy-harvesting device (EHD) that scavenges RF energy from V2X vehicle transmissions and uses it to send data packets to a remote access point. It proposes a cycle-based strategy in which the EHD harvests while the closest vehicle is within a distance ℓ of the device's projection on the road and transmits otherwise. The average throughput is derived analytically for general inter-vehicle distance distributions, with a saddlepoint approximation for Rician-faded harvested energy, a quantized Markov chain model for the battery, and closed-form expressions for Poisson traffic and fixed-spacing (platooning) traffic. A blackout probability expression is also derived for the fixed-spacing case. Monte Carlo simulations are used to validate the theoretical curves. The paper claims that regular traffic patterns such as platooning can increase throughput by more than 30% relative to irregular traffic of the same average intensity.

Significance. If its assumptions are accepted, this is a useful first tractable framework for RF harvesting from V2X communications. The derivation is detailed and parameter-free in the sense that the only tuned parameter is the harvest distance ℓ; the platooning advantage emerges from substituting a deterministic inter-vehicle distance rather than from fitted constants. The paper includes extensive simulation validation: the saddlepoint CDF accuracy is below 0.04 (Fig. 2), the battery quantization error is below 1% (Fig. 3), and the throughput curves match simulations across parameter sweeps. These are genuine strengths. However, the practical feasibility claim and the headline >30% gain rest on two load-bearing assumptions that need work: continuous transmissions at fixed power from every vehicle, and a comparison that is not actually 'same average intensity' in the supporting figure. Until these are addressed, the paper's central quantitative claim is not fully established for realistic V2X traffic.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II, Eq. (13)] The model assumes that every vehicle performs continuous wireless transmissions at fixed power Pv. The footnote in Section II states that intermittent transmissions can be accounted for by adding a transmission probability, but no such analysis is carried out anywhere in the paper. In real 802.11p/C-V2X systems, vehicles transmit periodic beacons and event-driven messages with a per-vehicle duty cycle of roughly 0.003-0.01, not 1. Since Eq. (13) assigns a full PvT energy quantum to every slot in the harvest phase, and Eqs. (34)-(35) inherit this, the harvested energy per vehicle passage is overestimated by orders of magnitude. The claimed >30% platooning gain is therefore only demonstrated for an idealized continuous energy source. Please redo the analysis with a transmission probability (or an equivalent duty-cycle factor) and show whether the optimal ℓ and the relative gains persist.
  2. [Abstract and Section V-A] The abstract claims that regular traffic patterns 'can increase the obtained throughput by more than 30% with respect to irregular ones with the same average intensity.' The supporting comparison in Section V-A uses Poisson traffic with μ=1/50 vehicles/m (mean inter-vehicle distance 50 m) versus platooning with d0=100 m. These do not have the same average intensity: the platooning scenario has half the vehicle density. Either provide a same-intensity comparison (for example, d0=50 m against Poisson μ=1/50) or revise the abstract and conclusions to state the actual comparison. This is a load-bearing mismatch because the headline result is precisely the quantitative gain at equal average intensity.
  3. [Section IV-B and Eq. (35)] For the platooning scenario, d0 is treated as a fixed external parameter, yet the paper notes that the EHD may choose to harvest from only a subset of vehicles, effectively using 2d0, 3d0, etc. The claimed platooning advantage is obtained after optimizing ℓ, but it is unclear whether the reported gains also optimize over this subset choice. If the subset choice is part of the strategy, it should be included in the optimization and stated clearly; otherwise, the comparison may underestimate the performance of the platooning scenario or, conversely, may not be the fairest baseline for the 'same average intensity' claim.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section II, footnote 1] The footnote on intermittent transmissions is too brief for a load-bearing assumption. Please move this discussion into the main text and provide at least a first-order numerical estimate of how a realistic duty cycle affects the harvested energy and the optimal ℓ.
  2. [Figures 6-12] The figure captions list transmit power values as 'Pt = 40 W', 'Pt = 60 W', etc., while Table II gives Pt = 40 µW. This unit inconsistency should be corrected (µW is presumably intended).
  3. [Appendix B, Eq. (50)] The combinatorial term Q(L,j|k) is introduced without a derivation. A short explanation of the counting argument would make the blackout probability derivation more self-contained and easier to verify.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No material circularity: the platooning throughput gain is computed from an independent renewal-reward derivation, and the only self-citation (to [28]) is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claims, including the more-than-30% platooning gain, are obtained by evaluating the derived throughput expressions (34) and (35) under two specified traffic models, namely Poisson arrivals with intensity mu and fixed spacing d0; no parameter is fitted to the reported outcome, and the gain is a consequence of substituting a deterministic inter-vehicle distance into the renewal-reward formula (11)-(12), not an input. The saddle-point approximation (20), the Markov-chain battery model (21)-(24), and the blackout derivation (47)-(51) are self-contained analytic constructions whose only external inputs are standard channel and approximation references ([31]-[33], [35]). The one self-citation, [28], is used only to justify that beacons contain position information and to define blackout events; neither use is load-bearing for the throughput or blackout formulas. Internal Monte Carlo validation uses the same model assumptions, which is a consistency check rather than a circular prediction. The main caveats, such as the continuous-transmission assumption in Section II and the lack of experimental validation in Section VI, are modeling and feasibility limitations, not circularity, and do not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; the EHD, finite battery, platooning, and blackout metrics are all existing concepts. The throughput prediction is a derived consequence of the assumed traffic process fD and the channel/harvesting model. The main approximations (battery quantization, one-vehicle harvest, neglected correlation, saddlepoint CDF) are validated only against Monte Carlo simulations of the same model, not against field measurements.

free parameters (1)
  • Harvest distance threshold ℓ = 0-12 m; optimal value found by 1 m grid search for each scenario
    This is the main strategy knob optimized in the paper. It is not fitted to external data, but the throughput result is always reported as a function of the optimal ℓ, so the quantitative gains depend on choosing it well.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Vehicles move at constant speed v0 on a single lane, and inter-vehicle distances form an i.i.d. sequence with known distribution fD.
    Used to define cycles and renewal rewards; Eq. (12) integrates over fD, and the platooning scenario is obtained by setting dv = d0.
  • domain assumption All vehicles transmit continuously with fixed power Pv on orthogonal channels, and the EHD can harvest energy from the whole V2X band.
    Stated in Section II; the energy input per slot is ηP_r^{(n)}T in Eq. (6). Intermittent transmissions are deferred to footnote 1.
  • domain assumption The EHD has perfect local topology information (positions and channels of nearby vehicles) but no knowledge of its battery state.
    Strategy σ maps topology configuration to mode in Section II-D; battery agnosticism is explicitly assumed.
  • domain assumption A linear energy harvesting model with efficiency η, slotted i.i.d. Rician/Rayleigh fading, and path loss exponent α.
    Equations (4) and (13); the linear model is justified by low input power from vehicles.
  • ad hoc to paper Battery charge is quantized in units of Etx, and harvested energy is rounded down to a multiple of Etx.
    Section III-C; introduced for Markov chain tractability, with simulated quantization error below 1%.
  • ad hoc to paper The renewal-reward average neglects correlation between transmissions in successive cycles caused by battery carryover.
    Section III-A; authors state the correlation is loose and neglect it, which is an approximation supporting Eq. (10).
  • ad hoc to paper Per-cycle harvested energy is approximated using only the closest vehicle, ignoring simultaneous contributions from other nearby vehicles.
    Section III-C; authors note this underestimates EH and is accurate when FD(2ℓ) is low.
  • ad hoc to paper Blackout derivation assumes the longest no-transmission interval in a cycle contains the HP and the trailing Nno slots, and that no energy outage occurs in the first w slots after the HP.
    Appendix B; these assumptions are stated in the blackout probability derivation and are approximations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of EH from V2X Communications: the Price of Uncertainty and the Impact of Platooning." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PMZ7Z3HP

@misc{pith2026241201502,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: EH from V2X Communications: the Price of Uncertainty and the Impact of Platooning},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PMZ7Z3HP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.01502}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we explore how radio frequency energy from vehicular communications can be exploited by an energy harvesting device (EHD) placed alongside the road to deliver data packets through wireless connection to a remote Access Point. Based on updated local topology knowledge, we propose a cycle-based strategy to balance harvest and transmit phases at the EHD, in order to maximize the average throughput. A theoretical derivation is carried out to determine the optimal strategy parameters setting, and used to investigate the effectiveness of the proposed approach over different scenarios, taking into account the road traffic intensity, the EHD battery capacity, the transmit power and the data rate. Results show that regular traffic patterns, as those created by vehicles platooning, can increase the obtained throughput by more than 30% with respect to irregular ones with the same average intensity. Black out probability is also derived for the former scenario. The resulting tradeoff between higher average throughput and lower black out probability shows that the proposed approach can be adopted for different applications by properly tuning the strategy parameters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.01502 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Graphic representation of the considered scenario. Above, a qualitative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Accuracy of the CDF and cCDF of the harvested energy obtained via saddle point approximation. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Harvesting threshold [m] 10 -7 10 -6 10 -5 10 -4 10 -3 10 -2 Quantization Error [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Quantization error as a function of the harvesting threshold. Solid lines are for the platooning scenario, while dashed lines are for the sparse vehicular traffic scenario. overflows. Both events in fact lead to the same battery status (empty or full), irrespective of the quantization. In the sparse vehicular traffic scenario, instead, the variance in the inter￾vehicle distance leads to a more smooth behavior of the… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Average throughput as a function of the harvesting distance ℓ, with Poisson arrivals. Lines are theoretical results, while markers are simulation results [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Average throughput as a function of the harvesting distance ℓ, with fixed inter-vehicle distance. Lines are theoretical results, while markers are simulation results. expression based on (34) matches the simulation results for all the parameters settings, thus confirmi…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Average throughput for varying values of the transmit power Pt, high vehicular traffic scenario with d0 = 50 m. Lines are theoretical results, while markers are simulation results. vehicular traffic scenario. Furthermore, battery overflow events due to very close vehic…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Average throughput for varying values of packet size S. Blue lines are for ℓ = 2 m, red lines for ℓ = 4 m and green lines for ℓ = 6 m. The inter vehicle distance d0 is set to 50 m. of energy depletion. Instead, increasing ℓ to 4 m and the transmit power to Pt = 40 µW i…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Energy efficiency in the platooning scenario (dashed lines) and in the sparse traffic scenario (continuous lines). 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Harvesting threshold [m] 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Black out probability Pt = 20 W Pt = 40 W Pt = 60 W Pt = 80 W Pt = 100 W [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:f…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Black out probability for varying values of the transmit power Pt. Continuous lines are theoretical results, markers are for simulation results. is another relevant quantity to be analyzed. It is especially important for some safety applications, which require timely …
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Black out probability for different channel models. Blue lines are for Pt = 60 µW, red lines are for Pt = 100 µW. performance than Rayleigh fading, although this is relevant only over a limited interval. This is because the average value of the harvested energy over a…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Illustration of the occurrence of a potential blackout of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Perpetual environmentally powered sensor networks,

    X. Jiang, J. Polastre, and D. Culler, “Perpetual environmentally powered sensor networks,” in IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005. , 2005, pp. 463–468

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    A novel solar harvesting wireless sensor node with energy management system: Design & imple- mentation,

    J. Henry, D. Qendri, R. Lang, and M. Youssef, “A novel solar harvesting wireless sensor node with energy management system: Design & imple- mentation,” in 2019 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2019, pp. 3381–3387

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    A cooperative clustering protocol with duty cycling for energy harvesting enabled wireless sensor networks,

    M. S. Bahbahani and E. Alsusa, “A cooperative clustering protocol with duty cycling for energy harvesting enabled wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 101–111, 2018

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Optimal energy allocation for wireless communications with energy harvesting constraints,

    C. K. Ho and R. Zhang, “Optimal energy allocation for wireless communications with energy harvesting constraints,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 4808–4818, 2012

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Energy harvesting from moving vehicles on highways,

    F. Han, A. W. Bandarkar, and Y . Sozer, “Energy harvesting from moving vehicles on highways,” in 2019 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2019, pp. 974–978

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Wireless networks with RF energy harvesting: A contemporary survey,

    X. Lu, P. Wang, D. Niyato, D. I. Kim, and Z. Han, “Wireless networks with RF energy harvesting: A contemporary survey,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 757–789, 2015

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    On optimal transmission policies for energy harvesting devices,

    N. Michelusi, K. Stamatiou, and M. Zorzi, “On optimal transmission policies for energy harvesting devices,” in 2012 Information Theory and Applications Workshop, 2012, pp. 249–254

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Performance analysis of energy harvesting sensors with time- correlated energy supply,

    ——, “Performance analysis of energy harvesting sensors with time- correlated energy supply,” in 2012 50th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), 2012, pp. 839–846

    work page 2012

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    DEARER: A distance- and-energy-aware routing with energy reservation for energy harvesting wireless sensor networks,

    Y . Dong, J. Wang, B. Shim, and D. I. Kim, “DEARER: A distance- and-energy-aware routing with energy reservation for energy harvesting wireless sensor networks,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun. , vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 3798–3813, 2016

    2016

  2. [10]

    A distributed energy- harvesting-aware routing algorithm for heterogeneous IoT networks,

    T. D. Nguyen, J. Y . Khan, and D. T. Ngo, “A distributed energy- harvesting-aware routing algorithm for heterogeneous IoT networks,” IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking , vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1115–1127, 2018

    2018

  3. [11]

    Modeling of multiple energy sources for hybrid energy harvesting IoT systems,

    D. Altinel and G. Karabulut Kurt, “Modeling of multiple energy sources for hybrid energy harvesting IoT systems,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 10 846–10 854, 2019

    2019

  4. [12]

    Joint beamforming and power-splitting control in downlink cooperative SWIPT NOMA systems,

    Y . Xu, C. Shen, Z. Ding, X. Sun, S. Yan, G. Zhu, and Z. Zhong, “Joint beamforming and power-splitting control in downlink cooperative SWIPT NOMA systems,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing , vol. 65, no. 18, pp. 4874–4886, 2017

    2017

  5. [13]

    Practical non-linear energy harvesting model and resource allocation for SWIPT systems,

    E. Boshkovska, D. W. K. Ng, N. Zlatanov, and R. Schober, “Practical non-linear energy harvesting model and resource allocation for SWIPT systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2082–2085, 2015

    2015

  6. [14]

    On opportunistic energy harvesting and infor- mation relaying in wireless-powered communication networks,

    G. Huang and W. Tu, “On opportunistic energy harvesting and infor- mation relaying in wireless-powered communication networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 55 220–55 233, 2018

    2018

  7. [15]

    Wireless energy harvesting in interference alignment networks,

    N. Zhao, F. R. Yu, and V . C. Leung, “Wireless energy harvesting in interference alignment networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 72–78, 2015

    2015

  8. [16]

    Power splitting- based SWIPT with decode-and-forward full-duplex relaying,

    H. Liu, K. J. Kim, K. S. Kwak, and H. Vincent Poor, “Power splitting- based SWIPT with decode-and-forward full-duplex relaying,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 7561–7577, 2016

    2016

  9. [17]

    Robust resource allocation and power splitting in SWIPT enabled heterogeneous networks: A robust minimax approach,

    Y . Xu, G. Li, Y . Yang, M. Liu, and G. Gui, “Robust resource allocation and power splitting in SWIPT enabled heterogeneous networks: A robust minimax approach,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 10 799–10 811, 2019

    2019

  10. [18]

    Optimization of power transfer efficiency and energy efficiency for wireless-powered systems with massive MIMO,

    T. A. Khan, A. Yazdan, and R. W. Heath, “Optimization of power transfer efficiency and energy efficiency for wireless-powered systems with massive MIMO,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 7159–7172, 2018

    2018

  11. [19]

    Resource allocation for wireless-powered IoT networks with short packet commu- nication,

    J. Chen, L. Zhang, Y .-C. Liang, X. Kang, and R. Zhang, “Resource allocation for wireless-powered IoT networks with short packet commu- nication,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1447–1461, 2019

    2019

  12. [20]

    Secure communica- tion with a wireless-powered friendly jammer,

    W. Liu, X. Zhou, S. Durrani, and P. Popovski, “Secure communica- tion with a wireless-powered friendly jammer,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 401–415, 2016

    2016

  13. [21]

    Wireless powered cooperative jamming for secure OFDM system,

    G. Zhang, J. Xu, Q. Wu, M. Cui, X. Li, and F. Lin, “Wireless powered cooperative jamming for secure OFDM system,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 1331–1346, 2018

    2018

  14. [22]

    Achievable throughput of energy harvesting cognitive radio networks,

    S. Park and D. Hong, “Achievable throughput of energy harvesting cognitive radio networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1010–1022, 2014

    2014

  15. [23]

    Opportunistic wireless energy harvesting in cognitive radio networks,

    S. Lee, R. Zhang, and K. Huang, “Opportunistic wireless energy harvesting in cognitive radio networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 4788–4799, 2013

    2013

  16. [24]

    Energy harvesting from multiple RF sources in wireless fading channels,

    D. Altinel and G. Karabulut Kurt, “Energy harvesting from multiple RF sources in wireless fading channels,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 8854–8864, 2016

    2016

  17. [25]

    Dedicated short-range communications (DSRC) standards in the united states,

    J. B. Kenney, “Dedicated short-range communications (DSRC) standards in the united states,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 99, no. 7, pp. 1162– 1182, 2011

    2011

  18. [26]

    Interworking of DSRC and cellular network technologies for V2X communications: A survey,

    K. Abboud, H. A. Omar, and W. Zhuang, “Interworking of DSRC and cellular network technologies for V2X communications: A survey,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 9457–9470, 2016

    2016

  19. [27]

    Challenges and solutions for cellular based V2X communications,

    S. Gyawali, S. Xu, Y . Qian, and R. Q. Hu, “Challenges and solutions for cellular based V2X communications,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 222–255, 2021

    2021

  20. [28]

    Multihop beaconing forwarding strategies in congested ieee 802.11p vehicular networks,

    F. Librino, M. E. Renda, and P. Santi, “Multihop beaconing forwarding strategies in congested ieee 802.11p vehicular networks,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 7515–7528, 2016

    2016

  21. [29]

    Wireless energy harvesting using signals from multiple fading channels,

    Y . Chen, N. Zhao, and M.-S. Alouini, “Wireless energy harvesting using signals from multiple fading channels,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 5027–5039, 2017

    2017

  22. [30]

    A system state aware switched-multichannel protocol for energy harvesting CRNs,

    P. Mukherjee and S. De, “A system state aware switched-multichannel protocol for energy harvesting CRNs,” IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. and Net., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 669–682, 2020

    2020

  23. [31]

    Joint optimization schemes for cooperative wireless information and power transfer over rician channels,

    D. Mishra, S. De, and C.-F. Chiasserini, “Joint optimization schemes for cooperative wireless information and power transfer over rician channels,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 554–571, 2016

    2016

  24. [32]

    Saddle point approximation for the distribu- tion of the sum of independent random variables,

    R. Lugannani and S. Rice, “Saddle point approximation for the distribu- tion of the sum of independent random variables,” Advances in Applied Probability, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 475–490, 1980

    1980

  25. [33]

    Approximations to the distribution of sum of indepen- dent non-identically gamma random variables,

    H. Murakami, “Approximations to the distribution of sum of indepen- dent non-identically gamma random variables,” Mathematical Sciences, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 205–213, 2015

    2015

  26. [34]

    Achieving high throughput in wireless networks with hybrid backscatter and wireless- powered communications,

    Y . Long, G. Huang, D. Tang, S. Zhao, and G. Liu, “Achieving high throughput in wireless networks with hybrid backscatter and wireless- powered communications,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 8, no. 13, pp. 10 896–10 910, 2021

    2021

  27. [35]

    Approximating a sum of random variables with a lognormal,

    N. B. Mehta, J. Wu, A. F. Molisch, and J. Zhang, “Approximating a sum of random variables with a lognormal,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 2690–2699, 2007

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.