REVIEW 1 cited by
Cepheid Mass-loss and the Pulsation -- Evolutionary Mass Discrepancy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
I investigate the discrepancy between the evolution and pulsation masses for Cepheid variables. A number of recent works have proposed that non-canonical mass-loss can account for the mass discrepancy. This mass-loss would be such that a 5Mo star loses approximately 20% of its mass by arriving at the Cepheid instability strip; a 14Mo star, none. Such findings would pose a serious challenge to our understanding of mass-loss. I revisit these results in light of the Padova stellar evolutionary models and find evolutionary masses are ($17\pm5$)% greater than pulsation masses for Cepheids between 5<M/Mo<14. I find that mild internal mixing in the main-sequence progenitor of the Cepheid are able to account for this mass discrepancy.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Pulsation periods reveal tension between theoretical and empirical radii for classical Cepheids in eclipsing binary systems
Using pulsation period instead of radius as a constraint for Cepheid evolutionary models systematically lowers the predicted radius, exposing a tension that is partially explained by a nonlinear radius increase in ful...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.