Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Benchmarks and Explanations for Deep Learning Estimates of X-ray Galaxy Cluster Masses

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.00005 v2 pith:PPZ2UY5M submitted 2023-02-28 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords x-raymassmathrmclustermodelmodelsphotonscatter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We evaluate the effectiveness of deep learning (DL) models for reconstructing the masses of galaxy clusters using X-ray photometry data from next-generation surveys. We establish these constraints using a catalogue of realistic mock eROSITA X-ray observations which use hydrodynamical simulations to model realistic cluster morphology, background emission, telescope response, and AGN sources. Using bolometric X-ray photon maps as input, DL models achieve a predictive mass scatter of $\sigma_{\ln M_\mathrm{500c}} = 17.8\%$, a factor of two improvements on scalar observables such as richness $N_\mathrm{gal}$, 1D velocity dispersion $\sigma_\mathrm{v,1D}$, and photon count $N_\mathrm{phot}$ as well as a $32\%$ improvement upon idealised, volume-integrated measurements of the bolometric X-ray luminosity $L_X$. We then show that extending this model to handle multichannel X-ray photon maps, separated in low, medium, and high energy bands, further reduces the mass scatter to $16.2\%$. We also tested a multimodal DL model incorporating both dynamical and X-ray cluster probes and achieved marginal gains at a mass scatter of $15.9\%$. Finally, we conduct a quantitative interpretability study of our DL models and find that they greatly down-weight the importance of pixels in the centres of clusters and at the location of AGN sources, validating previous claims of DL modelling improvements and suggesting practical and theoretical benefits for using DL in X-ray mass inference.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools