Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 78 references

Shock formation in 1D conservation laws II: Vanishing viscosity

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that small viscosity replaces a forming inviscid shock with a sharp, universal viscous profile: the $L^\infty$ difference is of exact order $\nu^{1/4}$, the shocking component converges in H\"older spaces exactly below…

desk verdict The sharp-rates machinery is real and probably right, but the main theorems inherit their key hypothesis from an unpublished companion, so the public record is conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.17156 v1 pith:PQFJCU2N submitted 2025-06-20 math.AP

John Anderson , Sanchit Chaturvedi , Cole Graham This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35L6535L6735B2535Q35
keywords vanishingviscosityshockformationconservationlawsmatchedasymptoticexpansionviscousBurgersHölderregularitynondegenerateNavier–Stokesequations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what happens when a small viscosity $\nu$ is added to a 1D conservation law just before its inviscid solution forms a shock. It proves that the viscous solution exists up to the shock time and converges to the inviscid solution in $L^\infty$ at the sharp two-sided rate $\nu^{1/4}$. It also identifies the precise shape of the viscous regularization: after rescaling time by $\nu^{1/2}$, space by $\nu^{3/4}$, and amplitude by $\nu^{1/4}$, the solution approaches a unique profile that solves the scalar viscous Burgers equation. A reader should care because this is the first sharp strong-norm description of vanishing viscosity for systems up to shock formation, and it covers physically degenerate diffusion such as compressible Navier\textendash{}Stokes.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the nondegenerate inverse-cubic preshock. The profile $\mathfrak{u}$ is defined implicitly by $x=a|t|\mathfrak{u}+b\mathfrak{u}^3$, and the cubic distance $\mathfrak{d}=(|t|+3a^{-1}b\mathfrak{u}^2)^{1/2}$ measures proximity to the singularity in the natural anisotropic scaling. Hypothesis (H6) asserts that the inviscid solution has a full asymptotic expansion in polynomials in $(t,\mathfrak{u},\mathfrak{m})$, where $\mathfrak{m}=a\partial_x\mathfrak{u}$, with leading term $\mathfrak{u}e_1$. Under the rescaling $T=\nu^{-1/2}t$, $X=\nu^{-3/4}x$, $\Psi=\nu^{-1/4}\psi$, the leading inner term satisfies the scalar viscous Burgers equation, and the paper matches the outer expansion to this inner expansion through a doubly-indexed grid of correctors whose horizontal sums give the outer terms and whose vertical sums give the inner terms.

What would settle it

Measure $\|\psi^{(\nu)}-\psi^{(0)}\|_{L^\infty}$ for a viscous system satisfying (H1)\textendash{}(H5) whose first singularity is degenerate, occurs on an interval, or involves multiple characteristics. If the difference scales with an exponent other than $1/4$, or if the rescaled profile $\Psi^{(\nu)}$ fails to converge to the unique viscous Burgers solution, the central claim is false. In the paper's own regime, the two-sided bound $C^{-1}\nu^{1/4}\le\|\psi^{(\nu)}-\psi^{(0)}\|_{L^\infty}\le C\nu^{1/4}$ can be checked directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under hypotheses (H1)\textendash{}(H6), the paper's central claim is that the viscous solution $\psi^{(\nu)}$ of the system exists on $[t_0,0]\times\mathbb{R}$ and is approximated to arbitrary Sobolev order by a matched asymptotic expansion built from simple building blocks. The sharp consequences are that $C^{-1}\nu^{1/4}\le\|\psi^{(\nu)}-\psi^{(0)}\|_{L^\infty}\le C\nu^{1/4}$; that the shocking component converges in $L^\infty_t C^\alpha_x$ if and only if $\alpha<1/3$, while the nonshocking components converge for $\beta<2/3$; and that after the blow-up $T=\nu^{-1/2}t$, $X=\nu^{-3/4}x$, $\Psi=\nu^{-1/4}\psi$, the blown-up solution tends locally uniformly to $U e_1$, where $U$ is the unique viscous Burgers solution matching the inverse cubic at infinity. The $2/3$ threshold for nonshocking components is not an artifact of the coordinate choice: it is forced by the off-diagonal diffusive term $\nu B^\perp_1\,\partial_x^2\sigma$ whenever the diffusion is not diagonal in the eigenbasis.

Load-bearing premise

The entire sharp-rate conclusion rests on the nondegenerate formation expansion (H6): the inviscid solution must approach shock formation through a single characteristic with an inverse-cubic preshock that admits the full asymptotic expansion in $\mathfrak{u}$, and if that structure fails, the $\nu^{1/4}$ rate and universal Burgers profile are not expected to hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Existence of smooth viscous solutions up to the inviscid shock time is obtained for a class of degenerate viscous systems, including the compressible Navier\textendash{}Stokes\textendash{}Fourier equations, where large-data global existence was previously unavailable.
  • The vanishing viscosity limit holds in $L^\infty$ with a sharp two-sided rate $\asymp\nu^{1/4}$, so the convergence cannot be improved to any smaller exponent.
  • H\"older convergence has sharp thresholds: the shocking component converges exactly for H\"older exponents below $1/3$, and nonshocking components below $2/3$; the difference is forced by the off-diagonal viscous cross-term.
  • Near the first singularity, the rescaled solution converges to a unique viscous Burgers profile determined only by two cubic coefficients and the effective diffusion coefficient, so the small-scale structure of a nascent shock is universal.
  • The outer and inner expansions match to arbitrary order, so quantities built from the solution near shock formation can be computed from explicit building blocks: inviscid hyperbolic terms, viscous Burgers terms, and linear transport or advection-diffusion terms.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the nondegenerate formation expansion (H6) is indeed generic, as the authors expect, then the $\nu^{1/4}$ rate and universal Burgers profile should be the default observation in numerical studies of shock formation, while degenerate or multi-characteristic shocks should show different exponents.
  • Editorial inference: the dimensions give a testable signature: the difference $\psi^{(\nu)}-\psi^{(0)}$ maintains order $\nu^{1/4}$ over a spatial scale $\nu^{3/4}$, and this ratio is exactly why $C^{1/3}$ convergence fails; checking the support scale of the difference is a direct numerical check.
  • Editorial inference: the same anisotropic blow-up and grid-matching strategy should transfer to 1D reductions of higher-dimensional symmetric flows and to repeated nonshocking eigenvalues; a repeated shocking eigenvalue would replace scalar viscous Burgers by a vector-valued analogue.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies the vanishing viscosity limit for one-dimensional systems of viscous conservation laws (1.1), up to the time at which the inviscid solution forms a first, nondegenerate shock. Under hypotheses (H1)--(H6), the authors construct a matched asymptotic expansion: an outer expansion in integer powers of the viscosity away from the preshock, a rescaled inner expansion near the preshock, and a doubly indexed ``grid'' expansion that mediates the matching between them. The main results are Theorem 1.3 (the true solution is approximated to arbitrary order in Sobolev norms by the approximate solution), Corollary 1.4 (sharp L∞ convergence rate of order ν^{1/4}), Corollary 1.5 (Hölder convergence thresholds 1/3 for the shocking component and 2/3 for the nonshocking components), and Corollary 1.6 (after the blow-up (1.5), the rescaled solution converges locally uniformly to a universal viscous Burgers profile). The proof is carried out through a long sequence of quantitative estimates, Propositions 3.2, 5.10, 6.1, 7.1, 7.11, and 8.3 being the main milestones, and is closed via Serre's local well-posedness framework for degenerate parabolic systems.

Significance. If the hypotheses are satisfied, this is a substantial advance: it gives the first sharp strong-norm rates for the vanishing viscosity limit up to shock formation for systems with degenerate physical viscosity, including in-principle application to compressible Navier--Stokes type systems. The paper's methodology is largely parameter-free: the ν^{1/4} rate, the Hölder thresholds 1/3 and 2/3, and the universal profile all come from anisotropic scaling and matched asymptotics rather than fitted constants. The construction of the leading inner term relies on the published, parameter-free analysis of viscous Burgers in [22]. The explicit estimates for outer, inner, and grid terms are extensive and internally coherent, and the decoupling between shocking and nonshocking characteristics is a genuine technical contribution.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.2, (H6)] The central hypothesis (H6), namely the nondegenerate inverse-cubic formation expansion of the inviscid solution, is assumed in Theorem 1.3 and Corollaries 1.4--1.6, but it is not proved in this manuscript. The text states that (H6') is shown in the companion paper [7], which is listed as ``In preparation,'' and that the genericity question is left to future investigation. Consequently, the displayed rates ν^{1/4}, the thresholds 1/3 and 2/3, and the universality of the Burgers profile are all conditional on an unpublished verification. Since the abstract and introduction claim that the results apply to the compressible Navier--Stokes equations, the manuscript should either include a proof of (H6) for a nontrivial class of data covering Navier--Stokes, or make the conditional character of the main theorems and of the applicability claims explicit in the abstract and introduction.
  2. [Corollary 1.5 and Section 8.1] Corollary 1.5 asserts convergence of the nonshocking component ω^(ν) to ω^(0) in L∞_t C^β_x if and only if β < 2/3. The proof in Section 8.1 establishes convergence for β < 2/3, but the sharpness statement is not proved there: the failure at the endpoint is only asserted for the shocking component σ at α = 1/3 (via (8.11) and the following comparison). The argument for the 2/3 threshold for ω is deferred to Remark 8.1, which gives a heuristic scaling argument and a toy model but not a complete rigorous lower bound for ‖ω^(ν)−ω^(0)‖_{C^{2/3}}. The statement should be strengthened by a proof of the failure at β = 2/3 for the actual nonshocking components, or weakened to a one-sided convergence statement.
  3. [Theorem 1.3 versus Theorem 8.7] Theorem 1.3 states that for any s,p ≥ 0 there exists K ∈ N such that ‖ψ^(ν)−ψ_app^K‖_{H^s} ≤ Cν^p, but the approximation constructed in Section 8 depends on two truncation parameters K and L (the outer and inner orders), and Theorem 8.7 estimates the error by ν^{min{(1−2β)K, Lβ/3}−Λ_n}. The statement of Theorem 1.3 suppresses the parameter L and the fact that both K and L must be chosen large depending on s and p. This is not a mathematical obstruction, but the statement should be aligned with the actual construction (e.g., by indexing the approximate solution by the pair (K,L)).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Proposition 4.1, Eq. (4.13)] The left side of (4.13) is displayed as [ν^{1/4}∂_T + A^⊥_⊥(0)]∂_X Ω_in_ℓ; from (4.9) and from the grid equation (4.16) the intended operator appears to be ν^{1/4}∂_T + A^⊥_⊥(0)∂_X applied to Ω_in_ℓ. Please clarify the notation.
  2. [Section 5.1, proof of Proposition 5.1] The proof says ``We say a polynomial in (t, 𝔲, log 𝔡) has polyhomogeneity,'' while the class Q_{h;d} was announced as polynomials in (t, 𝔲, 𝔪, log 𝔡). Since 𝔪 = 𝔡^{−2}, this is likely a harmless omission, but the definition should be stated consistently.
  3. [Remark 8.1] The statement that l_{I'}(ψ^(ν))∂_xψ^(ν) converges in L∞_t C^α_x if and only if α < −1/3 invokes negative Hölder spaces without definition; this should be either defined or rephrased in terms of the difference quotients used in the preceding discussion.
  4. [Throughout] There are occasional typos and repeated words, e.g., ``the the inviscid equation'' near the beginning of Section 3.1 and ``We again emphasize again'' in Section 4.1. A careful proofreading pass is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction of the main estimates: the ν^{1/4} rate, the Hölder thresholds, and the viscous Burgers profile are derived from the assumed inverse-cubic expansion (H6) by scaling and matched asymptotics. The only concern is that the applicability premise (H6) is itself deferred to the authors' in-preparation companion [7], a completeness risk rather than a circularity.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain for Theorem 1.3 and Corollaries 1.4–1.6. The outer expansion is built from the inviscid solution, the inner expansion from the blow-up (2.10), and the grid expansion is used only to match them. The ν^{1/4} convergence rate is derived, not fitted: in the diffusive zone {d ≲ ν^{1/4}} the blown-up difference Ψ^{in}_0 − u is order one, which scales back to ψ^{(ν)} − ψ^{(0)} of order ν^{1/4}; the Hölder thresholds follow from the same anisotropic scaling and Lemma 8.8; and the universal profile is identified as the unique viscous Burgers solution matching the inverse cubic at infinity. No parameter in the paper is fitted to the target rate, threshold, or profile. The main theorems are conditional on (H6), the nondegenerate inverse-cubic formation expansion, and the paper explicitly states that verification of (H6) on an open set of data is deferred to the companion paper [7], with the sentence 'In [7], we show that (H6′) is satisfied for an open set of initial data' and 'We leave this question to future investigation' (Section 1.1). This is a genuine limitation of the non-conditional applicability claim, but it is not circular: (H6) is an assumption used as input, and the conclusions are not used to define or justify (H6). The self-citations are of two kinds: [22] is a published, parameter-free construction of the viscous Burgers solution and provides independent support for the uniqueness used in Corollary 1.6, while [7] is an in-preparation companion used only for motivation and applicability, not in the proofs of the conditional theorems. Under the stated hypotheses the derivation is self-contained, so the paper is substantially independent; the score of 2 reflects the load-bearing reliance on an unpublished companion for the generic-applicability reading, not any circularity in the mathematical derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numbers are fitted to target data; all hypotheses are structural conditions on A, B, and ψ^(0). The main theorem depends on the six hypotheses (H1)-(H6) listed above and on standard well-posedness theory. No new physical entities are introduced. The grid expansion is an auxiliary mathematical construction, not a new postulated entity.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption H1: A is the derivative of a flux function, has N distinct real eigenvalues, and admits a strictly convex entropy-flux pair.
    Assumed in Section 1.1; secures hyperbolicity and provides the entropic structure used for local well-posedness of the viscous system.
  • domain assumption H2: The diffusion B has constant nullity s≤N-1, a fixed basis with first s rows vanishing, and D^2η(Bξ,ξ)≥c|Bξ|^2.
    Assumed in Section 1.1 following Serre and Kawashima-Shizuta; this includes physical degenerate viscosity such as in Navier-Stokes.
  • domain assumption H3: The initial data is smooth and constant outside a compact set.
    Technical regularity and behavior-at-infinity assumption in Section 1.1; the authors state the analysis is local and this is a convenience.
  • domain assumption H4: After gauge transformations, the first singularity occurs at (0,0), the shock forms in a single characteristic, and the corresponding eigenvalue vanishes at the origin.
    Assumed in Section 1.1; localizes and normalizes the shocking characteristic and excludes degenerate or multi-characteristic shock formation.
  • domain assumption H5: The diffusion coefficient B_1^1(0) in the shocking direction is strictly positive.
    Assumed in Section 1.1; needed so viscosity directly regularizes the shocking component. It fails for models with no diffusion in that direction.
  • domain assumption H6: The inviscid solution admits a nondegenerate formation expansion with leading inverse-cubic profile 𝔲 and homogeneous correctors.
    The key structural hypothesis from Section 2.2; the paper cites the companion work [7], in preparation, for its validity on an open set of initial data.
  • standard math Serre/Kawashima-Shizuta local well-posedness theory and the entropic change of variables give the nonlinear energy estimates used for closure.
    Used in Section 8 to prove that the true solution remains close to the approximate solution; taken as established background from the cited literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Shock formation in 1D conservation laws II: Vanishing viscosity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PQFJCU2N

@misc{pith2026250617156,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Shock formation in 1D conservation laws II: Vanishing viscosity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PQFJCU2N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.17156}
}
read the original abstract

We study the effects of weak viscosity on shock formation in 1D hyperbolic conservation laws. Given an inviscid solution that forms a nondegenerate shock, we add a small viscous regularization and study the limit as the viscosity vanishes. Using a matched asymptotic expansion, we determine the sharp rate of convergence in strong norms up to the time of inviscid shock formation, and we identify universal viscous behavior near the first singularity. To treat the complex interactions between multiple characteristics and the viscosity, we develop an approximation scheme that exploits a certain decoupling between shocking and nonshocking characteristics. Our analysis makes minimal assumptions on the equation, and in particular applies to the compressible Navier--Stokes equations with degenerate physical viscosity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.17156 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Shock formation in a scalar conservation law. As time evolves, the profile progressively steepens (blue, then purple) toward a preshock (red) at time 𝑡∗. 𝔲. Its character becomes most evident at the preshock 𝑡 = 𝑡∗, when 𝔲 develops a cubic cusp with infinite slope at the origin. We note that this behavior is generic but not exhaustive. For certain initial conditions of positive codimension, the first shock can be mo… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Due to transverse advection, the anisotropic diffusive zone {𝔡 ≲ 𝜈 1/4 } in green influences a much larger region, indicated here as two blue triangular “shadows” cast to either side. We observe that 𝐵 1 1 is the only entry of 𝐵 appearing at leading order, and we have assumed 𝐵 1 1 (0) > 0 in (H5). Thus at leading order we have a scalar conservation law with nondegenerate viscosity. Using 𝔲 as an ansatz for 𝜎, we ca… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Asymptotic structure of the inner and outer expansions: 𝜈 2𝜓 out 2 is asymptotically equivalent to the sum of the green row, while 𝜓 in 1 is equivalent to the sum of the blue column. When ℓ ≥ 1, we make one modification: the leading row (𝜓0,ℓ)ℓ only approx￾imately solves the expected equations. This leaves a residue 𝐹ℓ that we cancel in the next row (𝜓1,ℓ), where it acts with strength 𝜈 −1 . We describe this twist i… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [7]

    Shock formation in 1D conservation laws I: Inviscid structure

    John Anderson, Sanchit Chaturvedi, Cole Graham. Shock formation in 1D conservation laws I: Inviscid structure. In preparation. 2025

    work page 2025

  2. [22]

    The inviscid limit of viscous Burgers at nondegenerate shock formation

    Sanchit Chaturvedi, Cole Graham. The inviscid limit of viscous Burgers at nondegenerate shock formation. Ann. PDE 9 (2023) Paper No. 1, 80

    2023

  3. [1]

    The emergence of the singular boundary from the crease in 3𝐷 compressible Euler flow

    Leo Abbrescia, Jared Speck. The emergence of the singular boundary from the crease in 3𝐷 compressible Euler flow. arXiv e-prints (2022) 2207.07107

    arXiv 2022

  4. [2]

    Occurrence and non-appearance of shocks in fractal Burgers equations

    Nathaël Alibaud, Jérôme Droniou, Julien Vovelle. Occurrence and non-appearance of shocks in fractal Burgers equations. J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ. 4 (2007) 479–499

    2007

  5. [3]

    Équations aux Dérivées Partielles

    Serge Alinhac. A minicourse on global existence and blowup of classical solutions to multidi- mensional quasilinear wave equations. Journées “Équations aux Dérivées Partielles” (Forges- les-Eaux, 2002). Univ. Nantes, Nantes 2002 Exp. No. I, 33

    2002

  6. [4]

    Blowup of small data solutions for a class of quasilinear wave equations in two space dimensions

    Serge Alinhac. Blowup of small data solutions for a class of quasilinear wave equations in two space dimensions. II. Acta Math. 182 (1999) 1–23

    work page 1999

  7. [5]

    Blowup of small data solutions for a quasilinear wave equation in two space dimensions

    Serge Alinhac. Blowup of small data solutions for a quasilinear wave equation in two space dimensions. Ann. of Math. (2) 149 (1999) 97–127

    1999

  8. [6]

    Crime pays; homogenized wave equations for long times

    Grégoire Allaire, Agnes Lamacz-Keymling, Jeffrey Rauch. Crime pays; homogenized wave equations for long times. Asymptot. Anal. 128 (2022) 295–336

    work page 2022

Show all 78 references
  1. [8]

    On the front-tracking algorithm

    Paolo Baiti, Helge Kristian Jenssen. On the front-tracking algorithm. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 217 (1998) 395–404

    1998

  2. [9]

    Vanishing viscosity solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic systems

    Stefano Bianchini, Alberto Bressan. Vanishing viscosity solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic systems. Ann. of Math. (2) 161 (2005) 223–342

    2005

  3. [10]

    Global solutions of systems of conservation laws by wave-front tracking

    Alberto Bressan. Global solutions of systems of conservation laws by wave-front tracking. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 170 (1992) 414–432

    1992

  4. [11]

    Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws

    Alberto Bressan. Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws . Vol. 20. Oxford Lecture Series in Mathematics and its Applications. The one-dimensional Cauchy problem. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000) xii+250

    2000

  5. [12]

    The unique limit of the Glimm scheme

    Alberto Bressan. The unique limit of the Glimm scheme. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 130 (1995) 205–230

    1995

  6. [13]

    Unique solutions to hyperbolic conservation laws with a strictly convex entropy

    Alberto Bressan, Graziano Guerra. Unique solutions to hyperbolic conservation laws with a strictly convex entropy. J. Differential Equations 387 (2024) 432–447

    2024

  7. [14]

    Uniqueness of weak solutions to systems of conservation laws

    Alberto Bressan, Philippe LeFloch. Uniqueness of weak solutions to systems of conservation laws. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 140 (1997) 301–317

    1997

  8. [15]

    A uniqueness condition for hyperbolic systems of conserva- tion laws

    Alberto Bressan, Marta Lewicka. A uniqueness condition for hyperbolic systems of conserva- tion laws. Discrete Contin. Dynam. Systems 6 (2000) 673–682

    2000

  9. [16]

    Smooth imploding solutions for 3D compressible fluids

    Tristan Buckmaster, Gonzalo Cao-Labora, Javier Gómez-Serrano. Smooth imploding solutions for 3D compressible fluids. Forum Math. Pi 13 (2025) Paper No. e6, 139

    2025

  10. [17]

    Formation of unstable shocks for 2D isentropic compressible Euler

    Tristan Buckmaster, Sameer Iyer. Formation of unstable shocks for 2D isentropic compressible Euler. Comm. Math. Phys. 389 (2022) 197–271

    2022

  11. [18]

    Formation of point shocks for 3D compressible Euler

    Tristan Buckmaster, Steve Shkoller, Vlad Vicol. Formation of point shocks for 3D compressible Euler. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 76 (2023) 2073–2191

    2023

  12. [19]

    Formation of shocks for 2D isentropic com- pressible Euler

    Tristan Buckmaster, Steve Shkoller, Vlad Vicol. Formation of shocks for 2D isentropic com- pressible Euler. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 75 (2022) 2069–2120

    2022

  13. [20]

    Shock formation and vorticity creation for 3D Euler

    Tristan Buckmaster, Steve Shkoller, Vlad Vicol. Shock formation and vorticity creation for 3D Euler. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 76 (2023) 1965–2072

    2023

  14. [21]

    Non-radial implosion for compressible Euler and Navier-Stokes in T3 and R3

    Gonzalo Cao-Labora, Javier Gómez-Serrano, Jia Shi, Gigliola Staffilani. Non-radial implosion for compressible Euler and Navier-Stokes in T3 and R3. arXiv e-prints (2023) 2310.05325

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    From Navier-Stokes to BV solutions of the barotropic Euler equations

    Geng Chen, Moon-Jin Kang, Alexis F Vasseur. From Navier-Stokes to BV solutions of the barotropic Euler equations. arXiv e-prints (2024) 2401.09305

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Krupa, Alexis F

    Geng Chen, Sam G. Krupa, Alexis F. Vasseur. Uniqueness and weak-BV stability for 2× 2 conservation laws. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 246 (2022) 299–332. REFERENCES 67

    2022

  17. [25]

    Convergence of the viscosity method for isentropic gas dynamics

    Gui-Qiang Chen. Remarks on R. J. DiPerna’s paper: “Convergence of the viscosity method for isentropic gas dynamics” [Comm. Math. Phys. 91 (1983), no. 1, 1–30; MR0719807 (85i:35118)]. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 125 (1997) 2981–2986

    1983

  18. [26]

    Vanishing viscosity limit of the Navier-Stokes equations to the Euler equations for compressible fluid flow

    Gui-Qiang Chen, Mikhail Perepelitsa. Vanishing viscosity limit of the Navier-Stokes equations to the Euler equations for compressible fluid flow. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 63 (2010) 1469– 1504

    2010

  19. [27]

    Vorticity blowup in compressible Euler equations in ℝ𝑑,𝑑 ≥ 3

    Jiajie Chen. Vorticity blowup in compressible Euler equations in ℝ𝑑,𝑑 ≥ 3. arXiv e-prints (2024) 2408.04319

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Vorticity blowup in 2D compressible Euler equations

    Jiajie Chen, Giorgio Cialdea, Steve Shkoller, Vlad Vicol. Vorticity blowup in 2D compressible Euler equations. arXiv e-prints (2024) 2407.06455

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Chickering, Ryan C

    Kyle R. Chickering, Ryan C. Moreno-Vasquez, Gavin Pandya. Asymptotically self-similar shock formation for 1D fractal Burgers’ equation. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 55 (2023) 7328–7360

    2023

  22. [30]

    The formation of shocks in 3-dimensional fluids

    Demetrios Christodoulou. The formation of shocks in 3-dimensional fluids . Vol. 2. European Mathematical Society (2007)

    2007

  23. [31]

    Singularity formation for Burgers’ equa- tion with transverse viscosity

    Charles Collot, Tej-Eddine Ghoul, Nader Masmoudi. Singularity formation for Burgers’ equa- tion with transverse viscosity. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 55 (2022) 1047–1133

    2022

  24. [32]

    Dafermos

    Constantine M. Dafermos. Hyperbolic conservation laws in continuum physics . Fourth ed. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences] 325. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2016) xxxviii+826

    2016

  25. [33]

    Ronald J. DiPerna. Convergence of the viscosity method for isentropic gas dynamics. Comm. Math. Phys. 91 (1983) 1–30

    1983

  26. [34]

    Ronald J. DiPerna. Global existence of solutions to nonlinear hyperbolic systems of conserva- tion laws. J. Differential Equations 20 (1976) 187–212

    1976

  27. [35]

    Finite time singularities and global well-posedness for fractal Burgers equations

    Hongjie Dong, Dapeng Du, Dong Li. Finite time singularities and global well-posedness for fractal Burgers equations. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 58 (2009) 807–821

    2009

  28. [36]

    The existence and limit behavior of the one-dimensional shock layer

    David Gilbarg. The existence and limit behavior of the one-dimensional shock layer. Amer. J. Math. 73 (1951) 256–274

    1951

  29. [37]

    Solutions in the large for nonlinear hyperbolic systems of equations

    James Glimm. Solutions in the large for nonlinear hyperbolic systems of equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 18 (1965) 697–715

    1965

  30. [38]

    Viscous limits for piecewise smooth solutions to systems of conservation laws

    Jonathan Goodman, Zhou Ping Xin. Viscous limits for piecewise smooth solutions to systems of conservation laws. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 121 (1992) 235–265

    1992

  31. [39]

    C. M. I. Olivier Guès, Guy Métivier, Mark Williams, Kevin Zumbrun. Navier-Stokes regu- larization of multidimensional Euler shocks. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 39 (2006) 75– 175

    2006

  32. [40]

    Existence and stability of multidimensional shock fronts in the vanishing viscosity limit

    Olivier Guès, Guy Métivier, Mark Williams, Kevin Zumbrun. Existence and stability of multidimensional shock fronts in the vanishing viscosity limit. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 175 (2005) 151–244

    2005

  33. [41]

    The partial differential equation𝑢𝑡+𝑢𝑢𝑥 =𝜇𝑢𝑥𝑥

    Eberhard Hopf. The partial differential equation𝑢𝑡+𝑢𝑢𝑥 =𝜇𝑢𝑥𝑥 . Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 3 (1950) 201–230

    1950

  34. [42]

    Blow-up of solutions of nonlinear wave equations in three space dimensions

    Fritz John. Blow-up of solutions of nonlinear wave equations in three space dimensions. Manuscripta Math. 28 (1979) 235–268

    1979

  35. [43]

    Formation of singularities in one-dimensional nonlinear wave propagation.Comm

    Fritz John. Formation of singularities in one-dimensional nonlinear wave propagation.Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 27 (1974) 377–405

    1974

  36. [44]

    Moon-Jin Kang, Alexis F. Vasseur. Criteria on contractions for entropic discontinuities of systems of conservation laws. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 222 (2016) 343–391

    2016

  37. [45]

    Large-time behaviour of solutions to hyperbolic-parabolic systems of conservation laws and applications

    Shuichi Kawashima. Large-time behaviour of solutions to hyperbolic-parabolic systems of conservation laws and applications. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 106 (1987) 169–194

    1987

  38. [46]

    Systems of a hyperbolic-parabolic composite type, with applications to the equations of magnetohydrodynamics

    Shuichi Kawashima. Systems of a hyperbolic-parabolic composite type, with applications to the equations of magnetohydrodynamics. PhD thesis. Kyoto University, 1983

    1983

  39. [47]

    On the normal form of the symmetric hyperbolic- parabolic systems associated with the conservation laws

    Shuichi Kawashima, Yasushi Shizuta. On the normal form of the symmetric hyperbolic- parabolic systems associated with the conservation laws. Tohoku Math. J. (2) 40 (1988) 449– 464. 68 REFERENCES

    1988

  40. [48]

    Blow up and regularity for fractal Burgers equation

    Alexander Kiselev, Fedor Nazarov, Roman Shterenberg. Blow up and regularity for fractal Burgers equation. Dyn. Partial Differ. Equ. 5 (2008) 211–240

    2008

  41. [49]

    S. N. Kružkov. Methods for constructing generalized solutions for the Cauchy problem for a quasilinear equation of the first order. Uspehi Mat. Nauk 20 (1965) 112–118

    1965

  42. [50]

    Peter D. Lax. Development of singularities of solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic partial differ- ential equations. J. Mathematical Phys. 5 (1964) 611–613

    1964

  43. [51]

    Relative entropy and the stability of shocks and contact discontinuities for systems of conservation laws with non-BV perturbations

    Nicholas Leger, Alexis Vasseur. Relative entropy and the stability of shocks and contact discontinuities for systems of conservation laws with non-BV perturbations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 201 (2011) 271–302

    2011

  44. [52]

    Souganidis

    Pierre-Louis Lions, Benoît Perthame, Panagiotis E. Souganidis. Existence and stability of entropy solutions for the hyperbolic systems of isentropic gas dynamics in Eulerian and Lagrangian coordinates. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 49 (1996) 599–638

    1996

  45. [53]

    Navier-Stokes equations in gas dynamics: Green’s function, singularity, and well-posedness

    Tai-Ping Liu, Shih-Hsien Yu. Navier-Stokes equations in gas dynamics: Green’s function, singularity, and well-posedness. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 75 (2022) 223–348

    2022

  46. [54]

    Shock formation in solutions to the 2D compressible Euler equa- tions in the presence of non-zero vorticity

    Jonathan Luk, Jared Speck. Shock formation in solutions to the 2D compressible Euler equa- tions in the presence of non-zero vorticity. Invent. Math. 214 (2018) 1–169

    2018

  47. [55]

    The stability of simple plane-symmetric shock formation for three-dimensional compressible Euler flow with vorticity and entropy

    Jonathan Luk, Jared Speck. The stability of simple plane-symmetric shock formation for three-dimensional compressible Euler flow with vorticity and entropy. Anal. PDE 17 (2024) 831–941

    2024

  48. [56]

    The stability of multidimensional shock fronts

    Andrew Majda. The stability of multidimensional shock fronts. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 41 (1983) iv+95

    1983

  49. [57]

    Mellet, A

    A. Mellet, A. Vasseur. Existence and uniqueness of global strong solutions for one-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 39 (2008) 1344–1365

    2008

  50. [58]

    On blow up for the energy super critical defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger equations

    Frank Merle, Pierre Raphaël, Igor Rodnianski, Jeremie Szeftel. On blow up for the energy super critical defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Invent. Math. 227 (2022) 247–413

    2022

  51. [59]

    On the implosion of a com- pressible fluid I: Smooth self-similar inviscid profiles

    Frank Merle, Pierre Raphaël, Igor Rodnianski, Jeremie Szeftel. On the implosion of a com- pressible fluid I: Smooth self-similar inviscid profiles. Ann. of Math. (2) 196 (2022) 567–778

    2022

  52. [60]

    On the implosion of a com- pressible fluid II: Singularity formation

    Frank Merle, Pierre Raphaël, Igor Rodnianski, Jeremie Szeftel. On the implosion of a com- pressible fluid II: Singularity formation. Ann. of Math. (2) 196 (2022) 779–889

    2022

  53. [61]

    A characteristics approach to shock formation in 2D Euler with azimuthal symmetry and entropy

    Isaac Neal, Steve Shkoller, Vlad Vicol. A characteristics approach to shock formation in 2D Euler with azimuthal symmetry and entropy. Commun. Anal. Mech. 17 (2025) 188–236

    2025

  54. [62]

    Gradient blow-up for dispersive and dissipative perturba- tions of the Burgers equation

    Sung-Jin Oh, Federico Pasqualotto. Gradient blow-up for dispersive and dissipative perturba- tions of the Burgers equation. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 248 (2024) Paper No. 54, 61

    2024

  55. [63]

    O. A. Ole˘ınik. Discontinuous solutions of non-linear differential equations. Uspehi Mat. Nauk (N.S.) 12 (1957) 3–73

    1957

  56. [64]

    BV estimates fail for most quasilinear hyperbolic systems in dimensions greater than one

    Jeffrey Rauch. BV estimates fail for most quasilinear hyperbolic systems in dimensions greater than one. Comm. Math. Phys. 106 (1986) 481–484

    1986

  57. [65]

    Gesammelte mathematische Werke, wissenschaftlicher Nachlass und Nach- träge

    Bernhard Riemann. Gesammelte mathematische Werke, wissenschaftlicher Nachlass und Nach- träge. the. Vol. Suppl. 1. Teubner-Archiv zur Mathematik [Teubner Archive on Mathematics]. Edited and with a preface by Raghavan Narasimhan. BSB B. G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig; ...

    1990

  58. [66]

    A front-tracking alternative to the random choice method

    Nils Henrik Risebro. A front-tracking alternative to the random choice method. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 117 (1993) 1125–1139

    1993

  59. [67]

    Viscous approximation of strong shocks of systems of conservation laws

    Frederic Rousset. Viscous approximation of strong shocks of systems of conservation laws. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 35 (2003) 492–519

    2003

  60. [68]

    Local existence for viscous system of conservation laws:𝐻𝑠-data with𝑠 > 1+𝑑/2

    Denis Serre. Local existence for viscous system of conservation laws:𝐻𝑠-data with𝑠 > 1+𝑑/2. Nonlinear partial differential equations and hyperbolic wave phenomena . Vol. 526. Contemp. Math. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI 2010 339–358

    2010

  61. [69]

    The structure of dissipative viscous system of conservation laws

    Denis Serre. The structure of dissipative viscous system of conservation laws. Phys. D 239 (2010) 1381–1386

    2010

  62. [70]

    Systems of equations of hyperbolic-parabolic type with applications to the discrete Boltzmann equation

    Yasushi Shizuta, Shuichi Kawashima. Systems of equations of hyperbolic-parabolic type with applications to the discrete Boltzmann equation. Hokkaido Math. J. 14 (1985) 249–275. REFERENCES 69

    1985

  63. [71]

    The geometry of maximal development and shock formation for the Euler equations in multiple space dimensions

    Steve Shkoller, Vlad Vicol. The geometry of maximal development and shock formation for the Euler equations in multiple space dimensions. Invent. Math. 237 (2024) 871–1252

    2024

  64. [72]

    Thomas C. Sideris. Formation of singularities in three-dimensional compressible fluids.Comm. Math. Phys. 101 (1985) 475–485

    1985

  65. [73]

    Tang, Zhen-huan Teng

    T. Tang, Zhen-huan Teng. Viscosity methods for piecewise smooth solutions to scalar conser- vation laws. Math. Comp. 66 (1997) 495–526

    1997

  66. [74]

    On𝐿1 convergence rate of viscous and numerical approximate solutions of genuinely nonlinear scalar conservation laws

    Wei-Cheng Wang. On𝐿1 convergence rate of viscous and numerical approximate solutions of genuinely nonlinear scalar conservation laws. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 30 (1999) 38–52

    1999

  67. [75]

    G. B. Whitham. Linear and nonlinear waves . Pure and Applied Mathematics (New York). Reprint of the 1974 original, A Wiley-Interscience Publication. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (1999) xviii+636

    1999

  68. [76]

    Shock formation of the Burgers-Hilbert equation

    Ruoxuan Yang. Shock formation of the Burgers-Hilbert equation. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 53 (2021) 5756–5802

    2021

  69. [77]

    Unstable shock formation of the Burgers–Hilbert equation

    Ruoxuan Yang. Unstable shock formation of the Burgers–Hilbert equation. arXiv e-prints (2022) 2201.04208

    2022 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Zero-dissipation limit of solutions with shocks for systems of hyperbolic conservation laws

    Shih-Hsien Yu. Zero-dissipation limit of solutions with shocks for systems of hyperbolic conservation laws. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 146 (1999) 275–370. JA: Department of Mathematics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA Email address: jrlanderson@math.stonybroo...

    1999

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.