pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28191 · v1 · pith:PQXSLLUTnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Star Formation and Accretion in Nearby Galaxies

J. Moldon , A. Alberdi , M. Perez-Torres , G. Lucatelli , R. Beswick , M. Sargent , E. Brinks , R. D. Baldi
show 6 more authors
S. Dey F. S. Tabatabaei K. Rubinur N. Seymour M. Pandey-Pommier C. Bot
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 03:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords star formationsupermassive black holesaccretionSKAnearby galaxiesradio astronomygalaxy evolutionspectral index
0
0 comments X

The pith

SKA AA4's sensitivity and resolution will separate star formation from supermassive black hole accretion across galaxy scales.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that the Square Kilometre Array in its AA4 configuration can morphologically and spectrally distinguish the contributions of star formation from those of accretion onto supermassive black holes in nearby galaxies. This distinction uses microJansky sensitivity, sub-arcsecond resolution, and broad frequency coverage to examine processes from compact nuclear regions to diffuse galaxy-wide structures. Multi-scale spectral index maps and absorption features will separate thermal and non-thermal emissions to measure current and past star-formation rates, AGN activity, and interstellar medium properties. A sympathetic reader would care because these two mechanisms drive how galaxies form, evolve, and regulate their growth, and resolving their separate roles clarifies the main processes shaping the nearby universe.

Core claim

The μJy sensitivity, sub-arcsecond angular resolution and broadband coverage provided by SKA AA4 configuration will enable us to separate morphologically and spectrally the contribution from SMBH accretion and star formation processes, from the most compact nuclear region out to the most diffuse, galaxy-wide components. Disentangling thermal and non-thermal emission using multi-scale spectral index maps (traced by SKA-Mid) and absorption processes (traced mainly by SKA-Low) will allow us to account for the present and past star-formation rate, the AGN activity and the ISM properties. SKA observations of a wide range of galaxy types in the nearby Universe, including quiescent, AGN-dominated a

What carries the argument

Multi-scale spectral index maps traced by SKA-Mid and absorption processes traced by SKA-Low, which separate thermal from non-thermal emission to isolate star formation and AGN contributions.

If this is right

  • Observations of quiescent, AGN-dominated and starburst galaxies will show how star formation and accretion regulate galaxy evolution across types.
  • Time-domain and spectral-variability information will isolate compact accretion and transient phenomena.
  • Present and past star-formation rates, AGN activity and ISM properties can be accounted for from nuclear to galaxy-wide scales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same techniques could be tested on a subset of galaxies with existing multi-wavelength data to check consistency before full SKA deployment.
  • If successful, the approach might extend to statistical samples at moderate redshifts once sensitivity improves further.
  • Combining these radio maps with optical or infrared tracers could reveal spatial offsets between star formation and accretion activity not addressed in the paper.

Load-bearing premise

Multi-scale spectral index maps and absorption processes can reliably disentangle thermal and non-thermal emission from star formation and AGN activity without major contamination from other sources or modeling uncertainties.

What would settle it

An observation in which independent measurements from other wavelengths show that the derived star-formation rates or AGN luminosities from SKA spectral maps differ substantially due to unaccounted overlapping emissions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.28191 by A. Alberdi, C. Bot, E. Brinks, F. S. Tabatabaei, G. Lucatelli, J. Moldon, K. Rubinur, M. Pandey-Pommier, M. Perez-Torres, M. Sargent, N. Seymour, R. Beswick, R. D. Baldi, S. Dey.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Broadband radio-to-mm spectral energy distribution of a nearby star-forming galaxy, showing synchrotron (orange), free-free (blue), and thermal dust (violet) components, with total emission in black. Vertical dashed lines mark the free-free absorption turnover (𝜈t) and synchrotron cooling break (𝜈b); shaded bands indicate the SKA-AA4 frequency coverage. Key diagnostics include electron density, cosmic-ray … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: SFR–𝑀★ 3𝜎 detection threshold for the proposed observations, assuming 10, 5 and 0.5 hours for Tier 1, 2 and 3, respectively. For each band, curves (Tier 1/2/3: solid/dashed/dotted) show the SFR required at a given 𝑀★ for the expected total radio luminosity 𝐿𝜈 (SFR, 𝑀★) to equal the tier sensitivity at 20/50/200 Mpc. 𝐿𝜈 (SFR, 𝑀★) follows the 150 MHz calibration of Shenoy et al. (in preparation) for SKA-Low … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The appearance of galaxies is strongly dominated by two physical phenomena: star formation and accretion of material onto compact objects, primarily supermassive black holes. Nearby galaxies offer a unique window to study these processes in detail and with high spatial resolution. The $\mu$Jy sensitivity, sub-arcsecond angular resolution and broadband coverage provided by SKA AA4 configuration will enable us to separate morphologically and spectrally the contribution from SMBH accretion and star formation processes, from the most compact nuclear region out to the most diffuse, galaxy-wide components. Disentangling thermal and non-thermal emission using multi-scale spectral index maps (traced by SKA-Mid) and absorption processes (traced mainly by SKA-Low) will allow us to account for the present and past star-formation rate, the AGN activity and the ISM properties. SKA observations of a wide range of galaxy types in the nearby Universe, including quiescent, AGN-dominated and starburst galaxies, will provide a broad view of how star formation and accretion regulate galaxy evolution, while time-domain and spectral-variability information further isolate compact accretion and transient phenomena.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a science case arguing that the SKA AA4 configuration's μJy sensitivity, sub-arcsecond resolution and broadband coverage will enable morphological and spectral separation of SMBH accretion from star formation in nearby galaxies. This separation, from nuclear to galaxy-wide scales, relies on multi-scale spectral index maps (SKA-Mid) and absorption processes (SKA-Low) to constrain present/past star-formation rates, AGN activity and ISM properties across quiescent, AGN-dominated and starburst systems, with additional time-domain information for transients.

Significance. If the stated instrument performance is achieved and the separation techniques perform as described, the work would be significant for galaxy evolution studies by providing a systematic radio view of how star formation and accretion regulate galaxies, extending established methods to new scales and galaxy types. The paper correctly identifies the value of broadband, multi-resolution data but does not include new derivations or data.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that multi-scale spectral index maps and absorption processes 'will allow us to account for' star-formation rates, AGN activity and ISM properties rests on the assumption of reliable disentanglement with minimal contamination; the manuscript should add a dedicated paragraph (or subsection) quantifying expected uncertainties or citing prior simulations that demonstrate separation fidelity at the claimed scales.
minor comments (2)
  1. The manuscript would benefit from an explicit list of target galaxies or a table of representative types with expected flux densities to make the science case more concrete.
  2. [Abstract] Acronyms (SMBH, AA4, ISM) appear without first use definitions; adding these on first occurrence would improve accessibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment and constructive comment. We address the single major comment below and agree that a targeted addition will strengthen the presentation of the science case.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that multi-scale spectral index maps and absorption processes 'will allow us to account for' star-formation rates, AGN activity and ISM properties rests on the assumption of reliable disentanglement with minimal contamination; the manuscript should add a dedicated paragraph (or subsection) quantifying expected uncertainties or citing prior simulations that demonstrate separation fidelity at the claimed scales.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from an explicit discussion of the robustness of the proposed separation techniques. Although this is a science-case paper rather than a methods development study, we will insert a new dedicated paragraph (placed after the description of the SKA-Mid and SKA-Low capabilities) that cites existing simulations and multi-frequency observational studies demonstrating the fidelity of spectral-index and free-free absorption separation at sub-arcsecond to arcsecond scales. The paragraph will include order-of-magnitude estimates of residual contamination drawn from the literature on nearby galaxies observed with the VLA and e-MERLIN. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; descriptive science case with no derivations or fitted quantities

full rationale

The manuscript is a forward-looking science case advocating SKA AA4 capabilities for separating star formation and AGN contributions via established techniques such as multi-scale spectral-index mapping and absorption studies. No equations, derivations, parameter fits, or quantitative predictions appear in the text. Claims rest on prior radio-astronomy methods without internal reduction to self-defined inputs or self-citation chains. The document is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is a science case document with no mathematical derivations, fitted parameters, or new postulated entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5788 in / 1151 out tokens · 65955 ms · 2026-06-29T03:07:40.096925+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    F.X.Anetal

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae364. F.X.Anetal. InAdvancingAstrophysicswiththeSKA–II(AASKAII).2026. arXivsearch: Report number AASKAII/FangxiaAn01. 15 SF & Accretion in Nearby Galaxies Moldon et al. K. R. Anantharamaiah, J.-H. Zhao, W. M. Goss, and F. Viallefond.ApJ, 419:585, Dec

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae364 2026

  2. [2]

    doi: 10.1086/173510. R. D. Baldi et al.MNRAS, 508(2):2019–2038, Dec

    work page doi:10.1086/173510 2019

  3. [3]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2613. L. Barcos-Muñoz et al.ApJ, 799(1):10, Jan

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2613

  4. [4]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/10. R. Beck.A&ARv, 24:4, Dec

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/799/1/10

  5. [5]

    doi: 10.1007/s00159-015-0084-4. R. Beck and M. Krause.Astronomische Nachrichten, 326(6):414–427, July

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-015-0084-4

  6. [6]

    doi: 10.22323/1.215.0070. R. Braun et al.A&A, 461(2):455–470, Jan

    work page doi:10.22323/1.215.0070

  7. [7]

    , title =

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066092. M.A.BrentjensandA.G.deBruyn.A&A,441(3):1217–1228,Oct.2005. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361: 20052990. K.W.Cavagnoloetal.ApJ,720(2):1066–1072, Sept.2010. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1066. Y. Cendes et al.ApJ, 971(2):185, Aug

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066092 2005

  8. [8]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5541. M. S. Clemens, A. Scaife, O. Vega, and A. Bressan.MNRAS, 405(2):887–897, June

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5541

  9. [9]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16534.x. J. J. Condon.ARA&A, 30:575–611, Jan

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16534.x 2010

  10. [10]

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.003043. R. H. W. Cook et al.MNRAS, 531(1):708–727, June

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.003043

  11. [11]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1215. I. Delvecchio et al.A&A, 647:A123, Mar

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1215

  12. [12]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039647. S. Dey et al.ApJ, 938(2):152, Oct

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039647

  13. [13]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac82f2. S. Dey, A. Goyal, K. Małek, and T. Díaz-Santos.ApJ, 966(1):61, May

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac82f2

  14. [14]

    doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04080.x. L. Gajović et al.A&A, 695:A41, Mar

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04080.x 2001

  15. [15]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453003. E. Gallo, R. P. Fender, and G. G. Pooley.MNRAS, 344(1):60–72, Sept

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453003

  16. [17]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2613. J. A. Grundy et al.PASA, 42:e002, Jan

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2613

  17. [18]

    doi: 10.1017/pasa.2024.119. V. Heesen, R. Beck, M. Krause, and R. J. Dettmar.A&A, 494(2):563–577, Feb

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2024.119 2024

  18. [19]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810543. V. Heesen et al.AJ, 147(5):103, May

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810543

  19. [20]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/147/5/103. V. Heesen et al.MNRAS, 458(1):332–353, May

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/147/5/103

  20. [21]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw360. V. Heesen et al.A&A, 622:A8, Feb

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw360

  21. [22]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833905. R. Herrero-Illana et al.MNRAS, 471(2):1634–1651, Oct

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833905

  22. [23]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1672. P. K. Humire et al.A&A, 699:A183, July

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1672

  23. [24]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553897. P. Kaaret, H. Feng, and T. P. Roberts.ARA&A, 55(1):303–341, Aug

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553897

  24. [25]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab8a4d. M. S. Longair.High Energy Astrophysics

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab8a4d

  25. [26]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae744. S. Mattila et al.Science, 361(6401):482–485, Aug

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae744

  26. [27]

    doi: 10.1126/science.aao4669. A. Merloni, S. Heinz, and T. di Matteo.MNRAS, 345(4):1057–1076, Nov

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aao4669

  27. [28]

    1365-2966.2003.07017.x

    doi: 10.1046/j. 1365-2966.2003.07017.x. D. C. Molnár et al.MNRAS, 504(1):118–145, June

    work page doi:10.1046/j 2003

  28. [29]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab746. L. K. Morabito et al.MNRAS, 515(4):5758–5774, Oct

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab746

  29. [30]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2129. R. Morganti et al.Science, 341(6150):1082–1085, Sept

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2129

  30. [31]

    doi: 10.1126/science.1240436. E. J. Murphy et al.ApJ, 678(2):828–850, May

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1240436

  31. [32]

    doi: 10.1086/587123. E. J. Murphy et al.ApJ, 737(2):67, Aug

    work page doi:10.1086/587123

  32. [33]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/67. E. J. Murphy et al.ApJ, 761(2):97, Dec

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/737/2/67

  33. [34]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/97. T. W. B. Muxlow et al.MNRAS, 495(1):1188–1208, June

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/761/2/97

  34. [35]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1279. S. Niklas, U. Klein, and R. Wielebinski.A&A, 322:19–28, June

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1279

  35. [36]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012. 20554.x. F. Panessa et al.Nature Astronomy, 3:387–396, Apr

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012 2012

  36. [37]

    doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0765-4. T. Panurach et al.ApJ, 977(2):211, Dec

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0765-4

  37. [38]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8b9c. M. Pathak et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8b9c

  38. [39]

    doi: 10.1007/s00159-020-00128-x. C. Romero-Cañizales et al.A&A, 543:A72, July

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-020-00128-x

  39. [40]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201218816. R. H. Rubin.ApJ, 154:391, Oct

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201218816

  40. [41]

    D.R.G.SchleicherandR.Beck.A&A,593:A77,Sept.2016

    doi: 10.1086/149766. D.R.G.SchleicherandR.Beck.A&A,593:A77,Sept.2016. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628843. P. Schmidt et al.A&A, 632:A12, Dec

    work page doi:10.1086/149766 2016

  41. [42]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834995. D. J. B. Smith et al.A&A, 648:A6, Apr

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834995

  42. [43]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039343. Y. Song et al.ApJ, 916(2):73, Aug

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039343

  43. [44]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac05c2. J. M. Stil, M. Krause, R. Beck, and A. R. Taylor.ApJ, 693(2):1392–1403, Mar

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac05c2

  44. [45]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/693/2/1392. F. S. Tabatabaei et al.A&A, 475(1):133–143, Nov

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/693/2/1392

  45. [46]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078174. F. S. Tabatabaei et al.ApJ, 836(2):185, Feb

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078174

  46. [47]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/185. F. S. Tabatabaei et al.MNRAS, 517(2):2990–3007, Dec

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/185

  47. [48]

    L.J.Tacconietal.TheAstrophysicalJournal,768(1):74, apr2013

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2514. F.S.Tabatabaeietal. InAdvancingAstrophysicswiththeSKA–II(AASKAII).2026. arXivsearch: Report number AASKAII/Tabatabaei01. J. L. Turner and S. C. Beck.ApJ, 602(2):L85–L88, July

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2514 2026

  48. [49]

    doi: 10.1086/382699. E. Varenius et al.A&A, 593:A86, Sept

    work page doi:10.1086/382699

  49. [50]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628702. L. Wang et al.A&A, 631:A109, Nov

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628702

  50. [51]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935913. J. Westcott et al.MNRAS, 475(4):5116–5132, Apr

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935913

  51. [52]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty028. 17

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty028