An inverse random source problem for the time fractional diffusion equation driven by a fractional Brownian motion

Peijun Li; Xiaoli Feng; Xu Wang

REVIEW 1 major objections 3 minor 47 references

An inverse random source problem for the time fractional diffusion equation driven by a fractional Brownian motion

T0 review · 1 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Final-time statistics uniquely determine a fractional diffusion random source.

desk verdict First fBm extension for this inverse source problem, with a real but likely fixable gap in the H<1/2 uniqueness proof; send to peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03666 v1 pith:PR7VWVT5 submitted 2019-08-10 math.AP

Xiaoli Feng , Peijun Li , Xu Wang This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 35R3035R6065M32

keywords time-fractionaldiffusionequationinverserandomsourceproblemfractionalBrownianmotionMittag-Lefflerfunctionuniquenessill-posednessHurstindexmildsolution

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies a fractional diffusion equation whose random source is the time-derivative of a fractional Brownian motion with Hurst index $H$. It tries to show that the direct problem is well posed exactly when $\alpha+H>1$, and that the expectation and covariance of the solution at the final time uniquely determine the spatial profiles $f$ and $|g|$ of the source. This matters because fractional diffusion models anomalous transport in heterogeneous media, and real sources carry uncertainty; knowing which noise statistics can be recovered from terminal measurements is a prerequisite for using such models. The paper also shows that the recovery is unstable, with data Fourier modes decaying only like powers of $\lambda_k^{-1}$, so regularization is unavoidable. The main advance over earlier work is replacing Brownian noise by fractional Brownian noise and extending the admissible fractional order to the full range $0<\alpha\le1$ under the combined condition $\alpha+H>1$.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Mittag-Leffler kernel $G_{\alpha,k}(t)=t^{\alpha-1}E_{\alpha,\alpha}(-\lambda_kt^\alpha)$, which plays the role of the exponential heat kernel in fractional diffusion. The argument separates variables in the Laplacian eigenbasis, producing scalar stochastic fractional differential equations per mode. The fractional Brownian motion enters through its covariance kernel: for $H>1/2$ the quadratic variation of the stochastic integral is an explicit double integral over $|p-q|^{2H-2}$, while for $H<1/2$ it is expressed through the square-integrable kernel $K_{H,T}$ and the associated It\^o isometry. The positivity of these integrals, established in Lemma 4.2, is what lets products $g_kg_\ell$ be recovered from the covariance data. The instability comes from splitting the time integral at $t_*=\lambda_k^{-\gamma}$ and bounding the separated pieces by powers of $\lambda_k^{-1}$.

What would settle it

Compute numerically, or analytically, the sign and minimum of $\varphi_k'(s)$ on $[0,T]$ for one eigenvalue $\lambda_k$ with $\alpha=0.9$ and $H=0.3$; if $\inf_s\varphi_k'(s)\le0$ or if the covariance integral $I_{kk}$ in Lemma 4.2 is zero or negative, the uniqueness proof collapses for that parameter range. A simpler probe is $\alpha=1$, where $\varphi_k(s)=e^{-\lambda_k(T-s)}$ has $\varphi_k'$ increasing, so the asserted lower bound $\varphi_k'(s)\ge\varphi_k'(T)$ is reversed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 4.3: under Assumption 1, with $f,g\in L^2(D)$, $g\not\equiv0$, and $h$ positive and bounded below, the collection of expected values and covariances of the Fourier modes of the final-time field, $\{\mathbb E(u_k(T,\omega)), \operatorname{Cov}(u_k(T,\omega),u_\ell(T,\omega))\}_{k,\ell\in\mathbb N}$, determines $f$ and $|g|$ uniquely. The direct problem is claimed to be well posed for $0<\alpha\le1$, $0<H<1$, and $\alpha+H>1$, with the second-moment bound $\mathbb E(\|u\|^2_{L^2(D\times[0,T])}) \lesssim \|h\|^2\|f\|^2 + T^{2\alpha+2H-1}\|g\|^2$. The inverse problem is claimed to be unstable: the mode-$k$ data decay at least like $\lambda_k^{-1}$ for the mean and $\lambda_k^{-\beta}$ for the variance, where $\beta$ is a positive exponent that can be made small, so small data perturbations can produce large source errors. These results are established by separation of variables, the Mittag-Leffler representation of the fractional evolution, and the It\^o isometry for fractional Brownian motion.

Load-bearing premise

The argument needs the final-time kernel $\varphi_k(s)=(T-s)^{\alpha-1}E_{\alpha,\alpha}(-\lambda_k(T-s)^\alpha)$ to have a derivative that stays positive and bounded away from zero on $[0,T]$ when $H<1/2$; the paper asserts this monotonicity without proof, and it is false at $\alpha=1$, so the uniqueness theorem rests on an unverified premise in the rough-noise case.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For any fractional order $\alpha\in(0,1]$ and Hurst index $H\in(0,1)$ with $\alpha+H>1$, the expectation and covariance of the final-time field determine the deterministic profiles $f$ and $|g|$ uniquely.
The condition $\alpha+H>1$ is exactly the regime where the mild solution has finite second moments; when it fails, the singular integrals used to define the solution need not converge.
Reconstruction is unstable: mode-$k$ data decay no faster than $\lambda_k^{-1}$ for $f$ and $\lambda_k^{-\beta}$ for the variance, so arbitrarily small data noise can produce large source errors.
The same separation-of-variables arguments carry over to the fractional Laplacian, giving the same uniqueness and instability results in that setting.
The Brownian-motion special case with $1/2<\alpha<1$ is recovered as $H=1/2$, and the extension here covers all $0<H<1$ under the combined condition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Inference: Because the instability exponent $\beta$ can be made arbitrarily small by choosing $\gamma$ close to $0$ or $1$, practical reconstruction of $|g|$ will require strong regularization or additional data, not just more samples.
Inference: A direct numerical check of the covariance lower bound for $H<1/2$ and $\alpha$ near 1 would either confirm Lemma 4.2 or expose a gap; this is a tractable one-mode calculation.
Inference: The same statistic-based strategy should generalize to other random drivers with stationary increments and to nonlinear functionals of the field, since only the covariance kernel of the noise enters the argument.
Inference: The uniqueness result distinguishes $|g|$ but not the sign of $g$, so any reconstruction can only recover the magnitude of the random amplitude, matching the physics of second-order statistics.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

This paper is worth reading but not trustworthy as written. Its main novelty is real: it is the first to treat inverse random source problems for time-fractional diffusion driven by fractional Brownian motion for general H, and it isolates the condition alpha + H > 1 as the dividing line. It also answers the natural Brownian-motion question negatively for alpha <= 1/2. The direct problem estimates are mostly coherent, and the uniqueness strategy—positivity of the Mittag-Leffler kernel plus fBm covariance—is a natural extension of the Brownian case.

The soft spot is exactly where the reader flagged. Lemma 4.2 for H in (0,1/2) asserts that phi'_k is monotonically decreasing and uses phi'_k(s) >= phi'_k(T) > 0 as a lower bound. That is false for alpha = 1, where phi'_k is increasing; for alpha < 1 the claim is not established by the cited lemmas and the argument appears to go the other way. This is load-bearing because it converts covariance data into positivity of g_k g_l. The good news is that the gap is likely reparable: in fact phi'_k appears to be increasing, so phi'_k(s) >= phi'_k(0) > 0 would supply the lower bound, provided the four-term inner-product decomposition is rechecked with that bound.

The other problems are minor but real. Theorem 4.4's beta for H < 1/2 lists a term 2H; substituting t_* = lambda^{-gamma} into (4.13) gives 2 gamma H. The proof of Theorem 3.2 is deferred with "details omitted," and some series/integral interchanges are not justified. None of these are fatal; they are the kind of thing a serious referee can ask to be fixed.

If the H < 1/2 uniqueness proof is repaired, the paper delivers what it promises: a clean parameter condition and a clear statement of uniqueness and instability for a niche but legitimate class of stochastic inverse problems. The citation pattern is appropriate; there are no fitted constants or self-citations to inflate the result.

Recommendation: send it to peer review. It should not be desk-rejected. It needs a competent referee to push on Lemma 4.2 and the beta formula, but the core idea is sound and the contribution is new. If I were refereeing, I would ask for the fix and then accept.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper considers the initial-boundary value problem (2.1) for the time-fractional diffusion equation with a random source f(x)h(t)+g(x)\dot B_H(t), where B_H is a fractional Brownian motion with Hurst index H. It proves well-posedness of a mild solution when 0<α≤1, 0<H<1, and α+H>1, with the a priori estimate in Theorem 3.1. The inverse problem uses the expectation and covariance of final-time data u(x,T) to recover f and |g|; uniqueness is claimed in Theorem 4.3 via the lower bounds in Lemmas 4.1 and 4.2, and instability is characterized in Theorem 4.4. The main technical ingredients are Mittag-Leffler function estimates and the stochastic integral representation of fractional Brownian motion.

Significance. If the uniqueness proof is repaired, the paper would be a useful contribution to the inverse random source literature for fractional diffusion, extending the Brownian-motion results of [29] to fractional Brownian motion under the natural condition α+H>1. The direct problem estimates are detailed, the instability exponents are explicit, and the paper is generally self-contained in its use of the fBm stochastic calculus. However, the key lower bound for H∈(0,1/2) in Lemma 4.2 rests on a monotonicity claim about the derivative of the Mittag-Leffler kernel that is false for α=1 and unproved for α<1; this gap is load-bearing for Theorem 4.3. The remaining issues are local and appear reparable.

major comments (1)

[Section 4, Lemma 4.2, H∈(0,1/2) case] The proof asserts that φ_k(s)=(T-s)^{α-1}E_{α,α}(-λ_k(T-s)^α) has φ'_k(s)>0 and φ'_k monotonically decreasing, leading to φ'_k(s)≥φ'_k(T)>0. This is false for α=1, where φ_k(s)=exp(-λ_k(T-s)) and φ'_k(s)=λ_k exp(-λ_k(T-s)) is strictly increasing in s. For 0<α<1, φ'_k(s)=-(T-s)^{α-2}E_{α,α-1}(-λ_k(T-s)^α) tends to +∞ as s↑T because E_{α,α-1}(0)=1/Γ(α-1)<0, so φ'_k(T) is not a finite lower bound and the monotone-decrease statement cannot hold in the form used. Since this lower bound is used to make all four inner-product terms in I_kl positive, Lemma 4.2 is not established for H<1/2, and Theorem 4.3, which relies on this lemma to recover g_k g_l from the covariance data, is unsupported in that regime. A repair may be possible using φ'_k(s)≥φ'_k(0)>0 after proving monotone increase, but the present proof is incomplete.

minor comments (3)

[Theorem 4.4, case 0<H<1/2] Substituting t_*=λ_k^{-γ} in (4.13) gives the term t_*^{2H}=λ_k^{-2γH}, so the third entry in the minimum for β should be 2γH rather than 2H; please correct the displayed formula.
[Section 4, Lemma 4.2, H∈(0,1/2) case] The proof writes 'by the mean value theorem' to pass from φ'_k(u*_k) to φ'_k(u**_k) inside the integral; please state the regularity assumptions needed for this step, since u*_k depends on u.
[Section 2, Lemma 2.5] The displayed estimate writes an equality where an absolute value and an additional inequality step are needed; please adjust the line to avoid giving the impression that the derivative is nonnegative.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: uniqueness and stability are derived from external Mittag-Leffler and fBm stochastic-integral results, not from the target conclusion.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained and non-circular. The inverse uniqueness result (Theorem 4.3) is obtained from the forward representation formulas (4.1)-(4.3) together with Lemmas 4.1 and 4.2, which establish positive lower bounds for the deterministic Mittag-Leffler kernel integral and for the fractional-Brownian-motion covariance inner product. These lemmas rely on standard external results: complete monotonicity of E_{alpha,1} (Pollard [32]), asymptotic bounds for Mittag-Leffler functions (Podlubny [31], Gorenflo et al. [12]), and the isometry/covariance representation of fBm integrals (Nualart [30], Tindel-Tudor-Viens [37]). No parameter is fitted to the expectation or covariance data that the paper then claims to determine, and the data do not enter the definitions of f, g, h, or the eigenfunctions. The direct-problem stability estimate (Theorem 3.1) uses Young's inequality, Lemma 2.2, and explicit fBm integral estimates, and does not presuppose the inverse result. The cited prior work [29] on the Brownian-motion case is by different authors and serves only as an external benchmark for the case H = 1/2; it is not used to force the fractional-Brownian-motion conclusions. Self-citations by author P. Li appear only as background references on inverse random source scattering problems and are not load-bearing in the proofs. The only notable concern is a possible mathematical gap in Lemma 4.2 for H in (0,1/2), where the claimed monotonicity of phi'_k is asserted without proof and appears false as written; however, that is a correctness risk in the proof, not a circularity of the derivation. There is no step in which the conclusion is assumed, a fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction, or a load-bearing premise reduces to a self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters, fitted constants, or new physical entities. Its load-bearing inputs are standard Mittag-Leffler estimates, the known stochastic calculus of fractional Brownian motion, an explicit domain condition alpha + H > 1, and a standard positivity assumption on h. The only questionable extra ingredient is the monotonicity claim in Lemma 4.2, which is asserted rather than proved.

assumptions (5)

standard math Mittag-Leffler function bounds and complete monotonicity, Lemmas 2.2, 2.6, 2.7, cited to [31, 12, 32].
Used throughout the kernel estimates that give the direct problem bounds and the inverse problem positivity. These are established results, not new postulates.
standard math Fractional Brownian motion stochastic integral representation and Ito isometry, identities (A.1) through (A.7), cited to [30] and [37].
The covariance formulas in equations (3.6), (3.12), and (4.14) rely on this representation for both H above and below 1/2.
domain assumption Condition alpha + H > 1 for convergence of singular integrals in the direct problem.
The estimates of I1, I2, and I3 in Section 3 explicitly require alpha + H > 1; without it the stochastic convolution need not have finite second moment.
domain assumption Assumption 1: f,g in L2(D), g nonzero, h in L-infinity positive and bounded below by a positive constant.
This is needed for Lemmas 4.1 and 4.2 to produce strictly positive constants C1 and C2, which turn the expectation and covariance data into formulas for f_k and g_k g_l.
standard math Eigensystem of the Dirichlet Laplacian on a bounded Lipschitz domain, with eigenfunctions forming an orthonormal basis of L2(D).
Separation of variables and the series form of the mild solution in equation (2.4) depend on this standard spectral property.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An inverse random source problem for the time fractional diffusion equation driven by a fractional Brownian motion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PR7VWVT5

@misc{pith2026190803666,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An inverse random source problem for the time fractional diffusion equation driven by a fractional Brownian motion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PR7VWVT5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03666}
}

read the original abstract

This paper is concerned with the mathematical analysis of the inverse random source problem for the time fractional diffusion equation, where the source is assumed to be driven by a fractional Brownian motion. Given the random source, the direct problem is to study the stochastic time fractional diffusion equation. The inverse problem is to determine the statistical properties of the source from the expectation and variance of the final time data. For the direct problem, we show that it is well-posed and has a unique mild solution under a certain condition. For the inverse problem, the uniqueness is proved and the instability is characterized. The major ingredients of the analysis are based on the properties of the Mittag--Leffler function and the stochastic integrals associated with the fractional Brownian motion.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

[29]

P. Niu, T. Helin, and Z. Zhang, An inverse random source p roblem in a stochastic fractional diﬀusion equation, arXiv:1810.03144

work page Pith review arXiv
[1]

Adams and L.W

E.E. Adams and L.W. Gelhar, Field study of dispersion in a heterogeneous aquifer 2. Spatial moments analysis, Water Resources Res., 28 (1992), 3293–307

work page 1992
[2]

Aleroev, M

T.S. Aleroev, M. Kirane, and S.A. Malik, Determination o f a source term for a time fractional diﬀusion equation with an integral type over-determining condition, Electro nic Journal of Diﬀerential Equations, 270 (2013), 1–16

work page 2013
[3]

Aziz and S.A

S. Aziz and S.A. Malik, Identiﬁcation of an unknown sourc e term for a time fractional fourth-order parabolic equation, Electronic Journal of Diﬀerential Equations, 29 3 (2016), 1-20, 2016

work page 2016
[4]

G. Bao, C. Chen, and P. Li, Inverse random source scatteri ng problems in several dimensions, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantif., 4 (2016), 1263–1287

work page 2016
[5]

G. Bao, C. Chen, and P. Li, Inverse random source scatteri ng for elastic waves, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 55 (2017), 2616–2643

work page 2017
[6]

Bao, S.N

G. Bao, S.N. Chow, P. Li, and H. Zhou, Numerical solution o f an inverse medium scattering problem with a stochastic source, Inverse Problems, 26 (2010), 074014

work page 2010
[7]

Bao, S.N

G. Bao, S.N. Chow, P. Li, and H. Zhou, An inverse random sou rce problem for the Helmholtz equation, Math. Comp., 83 (2014), 215–233

work page 2014

Show all 47 references

[8]

Devaney, The inverse problem for random sources, Jour nal of Mathematical Physics, 20 (1979), 1687–1691

A. Devaney, The inverse problem for random sources, Jour nal of Mathematical Physics, 20 (1979), 1687–1691

1979
[9]

Furati, O.S

K.M. Furati, O.S. Iyiola, and M. Kirane, An inverse probl em for a generalized fractional diﬀusion, Applied Mathematics and Computations, 249 (2014), 24–31, 2014

2014
[10]

Ginoa, S

M. Ginoa, S. Cerbelli, and H.E. Roman, Fractional diﬀus ion equation and relaxation in complex viscoelastic materials, Phys. A, 191 (1992), 449–453

1992
[11]

Gorenﬂo and F

R. Gorenﬂo and F. Mainardi, Some recent advances in theo ry and simulation of fractional diﬀusion processes, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 229 (2009), 400–415

2009
[12]

Goreno, A.A

R. Goreno, A.A. Kilbas, F. Mainardi, and S.V. Rogosin, M ittag-Leﬄer Functions, Related Topics and Applications, Springer, Heidelberg, 2014

2014
[13]

Hatano and N

Y. Hatano and N. Hatano, Dispersive transport of ions in column experiments: an explanation of long-tailed proﬁles, Water Resources Research, 34 (1998), 1027–1034

1998
[14]

Ismailov and M

I.M. Ismailov and M. Cicek, Inverse source problem for a time-fractional diﬀusion equation with nonlocal boundary conditions, Appl. Math. Model., 40 (2016), 4891–4899

2016
[15]

Jia, J.G

J.X. Jia, J.G. Peng, and J.Q. Yang, Harnack’s inequalit y for a space-time fractional diﬀusion equation and applications to an inverse source problem, Journal of Diﬀer ential Equations, 262 (2017), 4415–4450

2017
[16]

Jin and W

B.T. Jin and W. Rundell, A tutorial on inverse problems f or anomalous diﬀusion processes, Inverse Problems, 31 (2015), 035003

2015
[17]

Kilbas, H.M

A.A. Kilbas, H.M. Srivastava, and J.J. Trujillo, Theor y and Applications of Fractional Diﬀerential Equations, volume 204 of North-Holland Mathematics Studies, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 2006

2006
[18]

Kirane and A.S

M. Kirane and A.S. Malik, Determination of an unknown so urce term and the temperature distribution for the linear heat equation involving fractional derivative in ti me, Appl. Math. Comput., 218 (2011), 163–170

2011
[19]

Kirane, A.S

M. Kirane, A.S. Malik, M.A. Al-Gwaiz, An inverse source problem for a two dimensional time fractional diﬀusion equation with nonlocal boundary conditions, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 36 (2013), 1056–1069

2013
[20]

M. Li, C. Chen, and P. Li, Inverse random source scatteri ng for the helmholtz equation in inhomogeneous media, Inverse Problems, 34 (2017), 015003

2017
[21]

Li, An inverse random source scattering problem in in homogeneous media, Inverse Problems, 27 (2011), 035004

P. Li, An inverse random source scattering problem in in homogeneous media, Inverse Problems, 27 (2011), 035004

2011
[22]

Li and G

P. Li and G. Yuan, Stability on the inverse random source scattering problem for the one-dimensional Helmholtz equation, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applicatio ns, 450 (2017), 872–887

2017
[23]

Li and T

Y.S. Li and T. Wei, An inverse time-dependent source pro blem for a time-space fractional diﬀusion equation, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 336 (2018), 257–271

2018
[24]

Liu and Z.D

Y.K. Liu and Z.D. Zhang, Reconstruction of the temporal component in the source term of a (time-fractional) diﬀusion equation, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 50 (2017), 3052 03

2017
[25]

Luchko, W

Y. Luchko, W. Rundell, M. Yamamoto, and L.H. Zuo, Unique ness and reconstruction of an unknown semilinear term in a time-fractional reaction diﬀusion equation, Inve rse Problems, 29 (2013) 065019. AN INVERSE RANDOM SOURCE PROBLEM 27

2013
[26]

Metzler and J

R. Metzler and J. Klafter, The random walk’s guide to ano malous diﬀusion: a fractional dynamics approach, Physics Reports, 339 (2000), 1–77

2000
[27]

Murio and C.E

D.A. Murio and C.E. Mej ´ ıa, Source terms identiﬁcation for time fractional diﬀusion equation, Rev. Colomb. Mat., 42 (2008), 25–46

2008
[28]

Di Nezza, G

E. Di Nezza, G. Palatucci, and E. Valdinoci, Hitchhiker ’s guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces. Bull. Sci. math., 136 (2012), 521–573

2012
[30]

Nualart, The Malliavin Calculus and Related Topics, Probability and its Applications (New York), Springer- Verlag, Berlin, second edition, 2006

D. Nualart, The Malliavin Calculus and Related Topics, Probability and its Applications (New York), Springer- Verlag, Berlin, second edition, 2006

2006
[31]

Podlubny, Fractional Diﬀerential Equations, volum e 198 of Mathematics in Science and Engineering, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA, 1999

I. Podlubny, Fractional Diﬀerential Equations, volum e 198 of Mathematics in Science and Engineering, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA, 1999

1999
[32]

Pollard, The completely monotonic character of the M ittag-Leﬄer function Ea(− x)

H. Pollard, The completely monotonic character of the M ittag-Leﬄer function Ea(− x). Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 54 (1948), 1115–1116

1948
[33]

Sakamoto and M

K. Sakamoto and M. Yamamoto, Initial value/boundary va lue problems for fractional diﬀusion-wave equations and applications to some inverse problems, J. Math. Anal. Ap pl., 382 (2011), 426–447

2011
[34]

Sakamoto and M

K. Sakamoto and M. Yamamoto, Inverse source problem wit h a ﬁnal overdetermination for a fractional diﬀusion equation, Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 1 (2011), 509–518

2011
[35]

Tatar, R

S. Tatar, R. Tinaztepe, and S. Ulusoy, Determination of an unknown source term in a space-time fractional diﬀusion equation, Journal of Fractional Calculus and Appl ications, 6 (2015), 83–90

2015
[36]

Tatar and S

S. Tatar and S. Ulusoy, An inverse source problem for a on e-dimensional space-time fractional diﬀusion equation, Applicable Analysis, 94 (2015), 2233–2244

2015
[37]

Tindel, C.A

S. Tindel, C.A. Tudor, and F. Viens, Stochastic evoluti on equations with fractional Brownian motion, Probab. Theory Related Fields, 127 (2003), 186–204

2003
[38]

Tuan and L.D

N.H. Tuan and L.D. Long, Fourier truncation method for a n inverse source problem for space-time fractional diﬀusion equation, Electron. J. Diﬀer. Equ., 122 (2017)

2017
[39]

Wang, Y.B

J.G. Wang, Y.B. Zhou, and T. Wei, Two regularization met hods to identify a space-dependent source for the time-fractional diﬀusion equation, Applied Numerical Mat hematics, 68 (2013), 39–57

2013
[40]

W.Y. Wang, M. Yamamoto, and B. Han, Numerical method in r eproducing kernel space for an inverse source problem for the fractional diﬀusion equation, Inverse Prob lems, 29 (2013), 095009

2013
[41]

T. Wei, L. Sun, and Y. Li, Uniqueness for an inverse space -dependent source term in a multi-dimensional time- fractional diﬀusion equation, Applied Mathematics Letter s, 61 (2016), 108–113

2016
[42]

Wei and J.G

T. Wei and J.G. Wang, A modiﬁed quasi-boundary value met hod for an inverse source problem of the time- fractional diﬀusion equation, Applied Numerical Mathemat ics, 78 (2014), 95–111

2014
[43]

Wei and Z

T. Wei and Z. Zhang, Reconstruction of a time-dependent source term in a time-fractional diﬀusion equation, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem., 37 (2013), 23–31

2013
[44]

Xavier and R.O

F.R. Xavier and R.O. Xavier, Boundary regularity for th e fractional heat equation, RACSAM, 110 (2016), 49–64

2016
[45]

Yamamoto and Y

M. Yamamoto and Y. Zhang, Conditional stability in dete rmining a zeroth-order coeﬃcient in a half-order frac- tional diﬀusion equation by a Carleman estimate, Inverse Pr oblems, 28 (2012), 105010

2012
[46]

F. Yang, X. Liu, X. Li, and C. Ma, Landweber iterative reg ularization method for identifying the unknown source of the time-fractional diﬀusion equation, Adv. Diﬀer. Equa ., 388 (2017)

2017
[47]

Zhang and X

Y. Zhang and X. Xu, Inverse source problem for a fraction al diﬀusion equation, Inverse Problems, 27 (2011), 035010. School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xidian University, X i’an, 713200, P. R. China E-mail address : xiaolifeng@xidian.edu.cn Department of Mathematics, Purdue...

2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [29]

P. Niu, T. Helin, and Z. Zhang, An inverse random source p roblem in a stochastic fractional diﬀusion equation, arXiv:1810.03144

work page Pith review arXiv

[2] [1]

Adams and L.W

E.E. Adams and L.W. Gelhar, Field study of dispersion in a heterogeneous aquifer 2. Spatial moments analysis, Water Resources Res., 28 (1992), 3293–307

work page 1992

[3] [2]

Aleroev, M

T.S. Aleroev, M. Kirane, and S.A. Malik, Determination o f a source term for a time fractional diﬀusion equation with an integral type over-determining condition, Electro nic Journal of Diﬀerential Equations, 270 (2013), 1–16

work page 2013

[4] [3]

Aziz and S.A

S. Aziz and S.A. Malik, Identiﬁcation of an unknown sourc e term for a time fractional fourth-order parabolic equation, Electronic Journal of Diﬀerential Equations, 29 3 (2016), 1-20, 2016

work page 2016

[5] [4]

G. Bao, C. Chen, and P. Li, Inverse random source scatteri ng problems in several dimensions, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantif., 4 (2016), 1263–1287

work page 2016

[6] [5]

G. Bao, C. Chen, and P. Li, Inverse random source scatteri ng for elastic waves, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 55 (2017), 2616–2643

work page 2017

[7] [6]

Bao, S.N

G. Bao, S.N. Chow, P. Li, and H. Zhou, Numerical solution o f an inverse medium scattering problem with a stochastic source, Inverse Problems, 26 (2010), 074014

work page 2010

[8] [7]

Bao, S.N

G. Bao, S.N. Chow, P. Li, and H. Zhou, An inverse random sou rce problem for the Helmholtz equation, Math. Comp., 83 (2014), 215–233

work page 2014