Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 107 references

High-Resolution Optical IFU Spectroscopy of the Complex Galaxy Merger II Zw 096

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A buried black hole powers the compact D1 knot of II Zw 096

desk verdict Useful new IFU data on a complex merger; the obscured-AGN claim is plausible but not yet secure because the non-AGN model grid under-samples D1's regime and the conclusions misquote the X-ray hardness ratio. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.06339 v1 pith:PT7762IA submitted 2025-07-08 astro-ph.GA

C.Riesco (PUC) , E.Treister (UTA) , G.Venturi (SNS) , F.Bauer (UTA) , G.Privon (NRAO) , C.Finlez (PUC) , S.Zamora (SNS) , D.Tubin (AIP)
show 15 more authors
Y.Song (ESO) I.del Moral-Castro (PUC) C.Ricci (UDP) C.Ramos (IAC) N.Levenson (STScl) V.U (UCI) A.Medling (UToledo) S.Aalto (SEE) G.D'Ago (IoA) V.Olivares (USACH) L.Barcos-Muñoz (NRAO) F.Ricci (UNIROMA3) G.Olander (SEE) F.Muller-Sanchez (UofM) P.Tissera (PUC)
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxymergersluminousinfraredgalaxiesobscuredactivegalacticnucleiintegralfieldspectroscopyMUSEstarburstionizationdiagnosticsIIZw096
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses MUSE integral-field spectroscopy, combining a wide field with adaptive-optics narrow-field pointings, to dissect the luminous infrared merging system II Zw 096. It argues that the compact region D1, which produces 40–70% of the system's infrared emission, contains a heavily obscured active galactic nucleus embedded in a compact starburst. The case rests on spatially resolved optical line ratios that fall in the Seyfert region of the [N II] diagnostic diagram, on the failure of starburst-plus-shock models to reproduce those ratios, and on supporting X-ray and millimeter indicators. If correct, this makes D1 a nearby laboratory for studying how buried supermassive black holes and extreme star formation coexist during the final stages of a galaxy merger.

What carries the argument

The key object is D1, a compact infrared-bright region with a measured size below 70 pc that dominates the system's luminosity. The argument is carried by the narrow-field adaptive-optics MUSE cubes that spatially isolate D1 from the nearby star-forming source D0, by the Baldwin–Phillips–Terlevich diagnostic diagrams built from those cubes, and by a parameter grid that combines a 5 Myr CLOUDY starburst with MAPPINGS III shock emission to test whether ordinary star formation plus shocks can explain the observed line ratios. A second piece of machinery is the ratio of the 2–10 keV X-ray flux to the 100 GHz ALMA continuum, which converts the lack of a detected AGN into an upper limit on its column density.

What would settle it

Run a non-AGN model grid with pre-shock densities extending to $4\times10^4$ cm$^{-3}$ and shock velocities beyond 150 km/s, and check whether any combination reproduces D1's observed [N II], [S II], and [O I] line ratios; if one does, the optical case for the AGN collapses. Alternatively, a Chandra exposure long enough to measure D1's hardness ratio with significance better than $0.1\pm0.3$, or a NuSTAR detection of hard X-rays, would decide the issue.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the D1 compact region of II Zw 096 is powered by an accreting supermassive black hole that is heavily obscured by dust, coexisting with a very compact starburst. This conclusion synthesizes several lines of evidence: adaptive-optics optical spectroscopy that resolves D1 from its bright neighbour D0 and places its [N II]/Hα versus [O III]/Hβ ratios in the Seyfert region; a combined CLOUDY starburst plus MAPPINGS III shock model grid that cannot reproduce the D1 line ratios without an additional ionizing source; a positive but statistically uncertain Chandra hardness ratio; an ALMA Band 3 to X-ray flux ratio that implies $\log N_{\rm H} > 24.5$ if the 100 GHz emission is AGN-dominated; and earlier infrared work suggesting a buried AGN. The paper also concludes that II Zw 096 is a merging system of at least three galaxies, with the western pair still showing rotation and the eastern C+D and E regions in a more advanced, highly disrupted stage.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the starburst-plus-shock model grid covers all plausible non-AGN ionization conditions in D1, especially because the grid caps pre-shock density at $1000$ cm$^{-3}$ while the paper cites an estimated density of $4\times10^4$ cm$^{-3}$ for D1; if a denser non-AGN model reproduces the line ratios, the optical evidence for the AGN weakens.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the D1 AGN is real, an accreting supermassive black hole is growing inside a sub-70 pc starburst whose surface density is already at the maximum starburst limit, so radiation pressure must shape both the starburst and the nucleus.
  • Because D1 emits 40–70% of the system's infrared light, any complete model of II Zw 096 must include both a buried AGN and a compact starburst, not star formation alone.
  • The kinematics are consistent with a collapsing small galaxy group rather than a simple binary merger, so the same multi-component interpretation should be tested in other luminous infrared mergers.
  • The potential outflow in II Zw 096A and the post-starburst tidal tail show that shock-driven ionization and feedback can appear before the galaxy nuclei coalesce.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not test whether a non-AGN model grid with pre-shock densities near the $4\times10^4$ cm$^{-3}$ estimated by Wu et al. (2022) could reproduce the D1 line ratios; that test could either harden or weaken the AGN case.
  • A longer Chandra or XMM-Newton exposure that measures the D1 hardness ratio with small errors would settle the AGN question independently of optical line modeling.
  • If confirmed, D1 would be a local analogue of the compact obscured nuclei invoked at high redshift, implying that some of the most luminous infrared galaxies are powered by buried black holes even when low-resolution optical spectra look starburst-dominated.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents VLT/MUSE Wide Field Mode and Narrow Field Mode observations of the merging LIRG II Zw 096, combining emission-line fitting, kinematic modeling, and archival multi-wavelength data. The authors identify at least three interacting structures (II Zw 096A, II Zw 096B, and the C+D/E complex), characterize their ionization through BPT diagrams and shock-model comparisons, and propose a two-stage merger scenario. The central claim is that the compact region D1, contributing 40-70% of the system's infrared luminosity, contains a heavily obscured AGN coexisting with a compact starburst. This claim rests on the optical line-ratio classification of D1, the failure of a CLOUDY + MAPPINGS III non-AGN model grid to reproduce the observed ratios, a positive but uncertain Chandra hardness ratio, and a model-dependent column-density upper limit from ALMA Band 3 data.

Significance. If the D1 AGN claim holds, the paper identifies a rare, heavily obscured accreting supermassive black hole embedded in a compact starburst, making II Zw 096 a valuable laboratory for studying AGN fueling and feedback in a complex, late-stage merger. The manuscript also provides a carefully reduced and analyzed high-resolution optical IFU dataset, with detailed multi-Gaussian emission-line fitting, pPXF continuum subtraction, Voronoi binning, and Bbarolo kinematic models. The authors are transparent about several limitations, such as the low significance of the D1 X-ray hardness ratio and the upper-limit nature of the column-density estimate, which strengthens the credibility of the observational analysis. However, the non-AGN model grid in Appendix C is not sufficiently broad to justify the strong conclusion that an additional ionizing source is required, and one of the three supporting lines of evidence is misquoted in the Conclusions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix C, Section 6.2] The conclusion in Section 6.2 that 'an additional ionization source is required' rests on the CLOUDY + MAPPINGS III grid described in Appendix C, but that grid does not bracket the plausible non-AGN conditions for D1. The grid fixes the starburst age at 5 Myr, metallicity at 0.5–0.8 Zsun, shock velocity at 150 km/s, pre-shock density at 100–1000 cm^-3, and a 50% shock contribution to H-alpha, whereas Wu et al. (2022), cited in the Appendix, estimates a gas density of ~4×10^4 cm^-3 for D1, more than an order of magnitude above the grid maximum. The paper argues that n=1000 cm^-3 is the closest grid point, but in MAPPINGS III shock line ratios are governed largely by the magnetic parameter B/√n, so fixing B=10 μG while increasing n by more than an order of magnitude does not reproduce the high-density regime. In addition, a younger starburst (1–3 Myr) containing Wolf-Rayet stars produces a harder ionizing spectrum and can raise [O III]/H-beta into the Seyfert region without an AGN; the 5 Myr age itself rests on CO and Br-gamma equivalent-width estimates with systematic uncertainties. I therefore ask the authors either to expand the grid to cover the actual density, age, and velocity range of D1, or to rephrase the non-AGN exclusion as conditional on the assumed grid.
  2. [Section 7 (Conclusions) and Section 5.2] The Conclusions misquote the Chandra hardness ratio of D1. Section 5.2 reports D1's hardness ratio as HR = 0.1 ± 0.3, while the value '-0.56 ± 0.08' quoted in Section 7 as 'a positive value (-0.56 ± 0.08) consistent with a hard source' is in fact II ZW 096A's soft X-ray hardness ratio. This is internally inconsistent and inflates the X-ray support for the AGN claim. The D1 HR is positive but carries a large uncertainty and is statistically consistent with both hard and soft spectra; the concluding synthesis should be corrected and should state that the X-ray evidence is only weakly consistent with an obscured AGN.
  3. [Section 4.3, Figure 8, Section 6.2] The optical evidence for an AGN in D1 is marginal. In the [N II] diagram the D1 point is classified as Seyfert but, as the text states, lies near the classification boundary once the error bars (0.01 in log([O III]/H-beta) and 0.1 in log([N II]/H-alpha)) are considered; in the [S II] and [O I] diagrams the point is classified as star-forming, with Seyfert not ruled out only by the error bars. The claim in Section 6.2 that the [N II] diagram shows a 'characteristic hard photoionization source' therefore overstates the diagnostic power of the optical ratios alone. This is not a reason to reject the AGN hypothesis, but it means the central claim must be framed as relying on the conjunction of several individually inconclusive diagnostics, including the expanded non-AGN model grid requested above.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.2] The phrase 'South paintings' should read 'South pointings' in the sentence describing the astrometric calibration sources for the NFM cubes.
  2. [Section 4.3 and Figure 9 caption] The [S II] wavelength is written inconsistently: the text uses λ(6717 + 6731) in the bullet list, while the Figure 9 caption uses λ6716 + λ6731; please standardize to one notation.
  3. [Section 6.3] The values '∆MS = 9' and '∆MS = 13' are not defined; please specify that this is the offset from the main sequence in dex relative to the Elbaz et al. (2007) relation, or provide the equivalent unit or normalization.
  4. [Figure 7 caption] The caption contains a repeated 'Top-panels:' at the start of the second paragraph; please remove the duplicate.
  5. [Section 6.2] The ratio 'F2-10keV/F100GHz < 2.7' is given without units; please state the units or refer explicitly to the definition in Ricci et al. (2023), as the value is used to derive a column-density limit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the D1 AGN inference combines independent MUSE, Chandra, and ALMA measurements with published external grids and calibrations.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, that D1 hosts a heavily obscured AGN combined with a compact starburst, rests on measured optical line ratios (MUSE NFM), the Chandra hardness ratio, the ALMA Band 3 flux, and independent infrared diagnostics from the literature. No model parameter is optimized to reproduce D1's line ratios and then renamed a prediction. Appendix C's CLOUDY + MAPPINGS III grid is computed from published codes with priors taken from Inami et al. (2010), Wu et al. (2022), Pereira-Santaella et al. (2024), and Rich et al. (2015); the grid's failure to reproduce D1 is a model-exclusion argument, not an identity. The column-density estimate uses the Ricci et al. (2023) F2-10keV/F100GHz relation as an external empirical calibration, applied conditionally ('If we assume that all the 100 GHz emission comes from the AGN'), so it is not a fitted-input-called-prediction even though C. Ricci is a co-author. The self-citations in the paper (Ricci et al. 2021, 2023; Barcos-Munoz et al. 2017) are archival measurements or external calibrations rather than uniqueness theorems or smuggled ansatze, and they do not carry the load of the derivation by themselves. Two concerns are flagged as non-circular: first, the Conclusions quote D1's hardness ratio as '-0.56 ± 0.08' whereas Section 5.2 reports D1 HR = 0.1 ± 0.3, an internal inconsistency that weakens the concluding X-ray support; second, Appendix C's pre-shock density range (100-1000 cm^-3) is far below the Wu et al. (2022) estimate of about 4e4 cm^-3, so the non-AGN exclusion grid is under-sampled. Both are correctness or completeness issues, not circular reductions of the conclusion to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central AGN claim rests primarily on the non-AGN model grid in Appendix C, which contains several hand-chosen or external inputs (shock fraction, age, density range, shock velocity). These inputs are not fitted to the D1 data, but they set the baseline against which the AGN is inferred. The other quantities (stellar masses, metallicities, column density upper limit) rely on standard calibrations from the literature. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Shock contribution fraction to H-alpha luminosity = 0.5 (assumed)
    Appendix C assumes shocks contribute half of the H-alpha luminosity as an upper limit, based on Rich et al. (2015). This hand-chosen fraction sets the location of the non-AGN model grid; a lower fraction shifts the grid and could change whether the D1 point is reproduced.
  • Starburst age = 5 Myr
    The CLOUDY SB model uses a 5 Myr old population from Inami et al. (2010). Line ratios are sensitive to age, and no grid over age is computed.
  • Pre-shock density range = 100-1000 cm^-3
    The MAPPINGS III shock grid is computed for densities up to 1000 cm^-3, while Wu et al. (2022) estimates D1's density at about 4e4 cm^-3, so the grid may not bracket the true conditions.
  • Shock velocity = 150 km/s
    Adopted from Pereira-Santaella et al. (2024); the MAPPINGS grid is not varied over velocity, and other shock speeds would change the shock line ratios.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption BPT diagnostic diagrams and the Kewley/Kauffmann boundary lines correctly separate star formation from AGN ionization in this merger.
    Used throughout Section 4.3 to classify sources; standard in the field but assumes no significant non-standard physics (for example unusual metallicity or density) that could shift the boundaries.
  • domain assumption Case B recombination with T=1e4 K and the Calzetti et al. (2000) attenuation law with R_V=3.12 apply to the gas in II Zw 096.
    Section 4.4 uses the Balmer decrement H-alpha/H-beta=2.86 to derive A_H-alpha and extinction-corrected SFRs and luminosities.
  • domain assumption The F2-10keV/F100GHz correlation from Ricci et al. (2023) is valid for the compact D1 region and gives a meaningful column-density upper limit.
    Section 6.2 uses this relation to derive log N_H > 24.5 cm^-2; the relation is calibrated on AGN samples and may not hold if the 100 GHz emission is dominated by dust.
  • domain assumption The Wen et al. (2013) 3.4 um stellar mass relation and the Curti et al. (2020) mass-metallicity relation are applicable to these galaxies and the E region.
    Used in Section 6.1 to estimate stellar masses and assess whether E follows the MZR; these relations carry their own scatter and systematics.
  • ad hoc to paper The CLOUDY + MAPPINGS III starburst-plus-shock grid brackets the plausible non-AGN ionization conditions in D1.
    Appendix C concludes that the failure of this grid to reproduce D1's line ratios implies an additional ionizing source; this is the load-bearing assumption for the optical AGN evidence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-Resolution Optical IFU Spectroscopy of the Complex Galaxy Merger II Zw 096." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PT7762IA

@misc{pith2026250706339,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-Resolution Optical IFU Spectroscopy of the Complex Galaxy Merger II Zw 096},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PT7762IA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.06339}
}
read the original abstract

Luminous and Ultra-luminous IR galaxies ((U)LIRGs) are critical for investigating feedback mechanisms due to a combination of intense star formation (SF) episodes and active galactic nuclei (AGN), particularly in the context of complex galaxy interactions. We conduct a detailed analysis of the II ZW 096 merging system using the Multi-Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE) on the Very Large Telescope (VLT), combining high-resolution Narrow Field Mode (NFM) and large-area Wide Field Mode (WFM) observations. We mapped the morphology, kinematics, and ionizing radiation of the system's gas by fitting atomic emission lines and the optical continuum. We identify three or more distinct galaxies within II ZW 096, revealing rotational patterns and complex interactions consistent with a collapsing small galaxy group. The kinematics and ionization structures suggest high star formation rates and shock-driven processes, which align with this proposed scenario. Focusing on the D1 compact region, which contributes 40-70% of the system's IR emission, and combining information from archival multi-wavelength observations, we find strong evidence of a heavily obscured AGN powering it. Our analysis of the internal structure, interactions, and merger state of II ZW 096 offers novel insights into the galaxy evolution processes in this dynamic and highly chaotic system

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.06339 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Color composite image of the MUSE WFM data with examples of spectral fits from selected regions. The blue, green, and red channels correspond to the continuum collapse in the [5200-5700]˚A, [7000-7500]˚A, and [8600-9100] ˚A ranges, respectively. Spectrum 1 is a Balmer absorption spectrum from the Hβ + [OIII] of the tidal tail of II ZW 096A in the direction of C+D, also representative of the E region. The black lines… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Multiple observations of II ZW 096. In all panels, the region’s names follow the nomenclature of Goldader (1997). (a) Composite color image of II ZW 096 using JWST/MIRI F560W (red), HST/NICMOS F160W (green), and HST/ACS F435W (blue). (b) Color image from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Maps of the Hα line flux per spaxel for the II ZW 096 system. Contours represent the collapsed emission in the [8600-9100]˚A range, with scale bars of 5 kpcs in the WFM and one kpc in the NFM. The five regions are labeled by their names II ZW 096A, II ZW 096B, C, D, and E. In the NFM, the red sources correspond to JWST/MIRI observations from Inami et al. (2022), while the blue sources are CO/ALMA detections from Wu … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (17 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Velocity map extracted from the Hα emission line. The contours, regions, and sources are defined in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Velocity dispersion of the Hα emission line. The contours, regions, and sources are defined in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Maps of the flux, velocity, and velocity dispersion of the three different components from the Hα emission line in NFM-South. The contours, regions, and sources are defined in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Bbarolo models for II ZW 096A and II ZW 096B. The contours, regions, and sources correspond to those already defined in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: [N II]λ6584/Hα diagnostic diagrams (Baldwin et al. 1981) of the WFM and NFM. The contours, regions, and sources were already defined in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: AHα map of the WFM and NFM, derived from the observed Hα/Hβ ratio. The contours, regions, and sources are defined in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Smoothed X-ray images using a Gaussian filter with a 0.5′′×0.5′′radius from the soft, 0.5-2 keV, and hard, 2-8 keV, bands. The contours, regions, and sources are the same as defined in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Hα and [O III]λ5007 Velocity maps for the E region. The contours are defined in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Representation of the merger stage of II ZW 096. II ZW 096A is shown in green, II ZW 096B in magenta, and the C+D and E regions are represented in blue. II ZW 096A exhibits two main interactions: the prominent tidal tail extending toward C+D, characterized by shocks a…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Emission line flux ratio of log([O III] λ5007/Hβ). The contours, regions, and sources are defined in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Emission line flux ratio of log([N II] λ6583/Hα). The contours, regions, and sources are defined in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Emission line flux ratio of log([S II] λ(6717 + 6731)/Hα). The contours, regions, and sources are defined in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Emission line flux ratio of log([O I] λ6300/Hα). The contours, regions, and sources are defined in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Map of the blue bump excess characteristic of WR stars, measured in the 4650–4707 ˚Aspectral range where this feature is identified. Only the NFM-South pointing is shown, as it is the only one exhibiting this signature. The WFM map is included for reference to illustr…
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: [N II] diagnostic diagram as presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_20.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G., Groves, B

    Allen, M. G., Groves, B. A., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., & Kewley, L. J. 2008, 10.1086/589652

    doi:10.1086/589652 2008

  2. [2]

    2004, in Proceedings

    Altintas , I., Berkley , C., Jaeger , E., et al. 2004, in Proceedings. 16th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management, 2004., 423--424, 10.1109/SSDM.2004.1311241

    arXiv 2004

  3. [3]

    M., Evans, A

    Armus, L., Mazzarella, J. M., Evans, A. S., et al. 2009, 10.1086/600092

    doi:10.1086/600092 2009

  4. [4]

    A., & Klöckner, H

    Baan, W. A., & Klöckner, H. R. 2006, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 449, 559, 10.1051/0004-6361:20042331

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042331 2006

  5. [5]

    A., Phillips, M

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, CLASSIFICATION PARAMETERS FOR THE EMISSION-LINE SPECTRA OF EXTRAGALACTIC OBJECTS

    1981

  6. [6]

    2004, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Banse , K., Ballester , P., Izzo , C., et al. 2004, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 314, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems (ADASS) XIII, ed. F. Ochsenbein , M. G. Allen , & D. Egret , 392

    2004

  7. [7]

    K., Evans , A

    Barcos-Mu \ n oz , L., Leroy , A. K., Evans , A. S., et al. 2017, , 843, 117, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa789a

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa789a 2017

  8. [8]

    2016, , 461, 3111, 10.1093/mnras/stw1234

    Belfiore , F., Maiolino , R., Maraston , C., et al. 2016, , 461, 3111, 10.1093/mnras/stw1234

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1234 2016

Show all 107 references
  1. [9]

    2022, , 659, A26, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141859

    Belfiore , F., Santoro , F., Groves , B., et al. 2022, , 659, A26, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141859

    2022 doi

  2. [10]

    2008, , 677, 846, 10.1086/529068

    Bennert , N., Canalizo , G., Jungwiert , B., et al. 2008, , 677, 846, 10.1086/529068

    2008 doi

  3. [11]

    2019, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935829

    Bittner, A., Falcón-Barroso, J., Nedelchev, B., et al. 2019, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935829

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    H., & Socrates, A

    Blaes, O., Lee, M. H., & Socrates, A. 2002, The Kozai Mechanism and the Evolution of Binary Supermassive Black Holes

    2002

  5. [13]

    N., & Hasinger , G

    Brandt , W. N., & Hasinger , G. 2005, , 43, 827, 10.1146/annurev.astro.43.051804.102213

    2005 arXiv

  6. [14]

    G., Vallenari, A., Prusti, T., et al

    Brown, A. G., Vallenari, A., Prusti, T., et al. 2021, Gaia Early Data Release 3: Summary of the contents and survey properties, EDP Sciences, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039657

    2021 doi

  7. [15]

    C., et al

    Calzetti , D., Armus , L., Bohlin , R. C., et al. 2000, , 533, 682, 10.1086/308692

    2000 doi

  8. [16]

    2007, , 669, 801, 10.1086/521721

    Canalizo , G., Bennert , N., Jungwiert , B., et al. 2007, , 669, 801, 10.1086/521721

    2007 doi

  9. [17]

    Cappellari, M. 2009. http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.1303

    2009 arXiv

  10. [18]

    2016, 10.1093/mnras/stw3020

    ---. 2016, 10.1093/mnras/stw3020

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    2005, , 364, 407, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09608.x

    Cattaneo , A., Blaizot , J., Devriendt , J., & Guiderdoni , B. 2005, , 364, 407, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09608.x

    2005

  12. [20]

    J., Jacoby , G

    Ciardullo , R., Feldmeier , J. J., Jacoby , G. H., et al. 2002, , 577, 31, 10.1086/342180

    2002 doi

  13. [21]

    M., Nevin, R., Stemo, A., et al

    Comerford, J. M., Nevin, R., Stemo, A., et al. 2018, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae2b4

    2018 doi

  14. [22]

    S., Hughes , T

    Couto , G. S., Hughes , T. M., Boquien , M., et al. 2021, , 654, A128, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141490

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 491, 944, 10.1093/mnras/stz2910

    Curti, M., Mannucci, F., Cresci, G., & Maiolino, R. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 491, 944, 10.1093/mnras/stz2910

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    A., Smith , J

    Dale , D. A., Smith , J. D. T., Schlawin , E. A., et al. 2009, , 693, 1821, 10.1088/0004-637X/693/2/1821

    2009 doi

  17. [25]

    2019, , 485, 3794, 10.1093/mnras/stz637

    del Moral-Castro , I., Garc \' a-Lorenzo , B., Ramos Almeida , C., et al. 2019, , 485, 3794, 10.1093/mnras/stz637

    2019 doi

  18. [26]

    R., García-Bernete, I., Rigopoulou, D., et al

    Donnan, F. R., García-Bernete, I., Rigopoulou, D., et al. 2024. http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.17479

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    A., Kewley , L

    Dopita , M. A., Kewley , L. J., Heisler , C. A., & Sutherland , R. S. 2000, , 542, 224, 10.1086/309538

    2000 doi

  20. [28]

    2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 846, 32, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa81d7

    Díaz-Santos, T., Armus, L., Charmandaris, V., et al. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 846, 32, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa81d7

    2017 doi

  21. [29]

    2007, , 468, 33, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077525

    Elbaz , D., Daddi , E., Le Borgne , D., et al. 2007, , 468, 33, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077525

    2007 doi

  22. [30]

    K., Goto, T., & Doi, Y

    Eser, E. K., Goto, T., & Doi, Y. 2014, 10.1088/0004-637X/797/1/54

    2014 doi

  23. [31]

    2014, CPL: Common Pipeline Library

    ESO CPL Development Team . 2014, CPL: Common Pipeline Library . 1402.010

    2014

  24. [32]

    2015, EsoRex: ESO Recipe Execution Tool

    ---. 2015, EsoRex: ESO Recipe Execution Tool . 1504.003

    2015

  25. [33]

    L., McGregor , P

    Farage , C. L., McGregor , P. J., Dopita , M. A., & Bicknell , G. V. 2010, , 724, 267, 10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/267

    2010 doi

  26. [34]

    M., Mayer , L., et al

    Feldmann , R., Carollo , C. M., Mayer , L., et al. 2010, , 709, 218, 10.1088/0004-637X/709/1/218

    2010 doi

  27. [35]

    J., Porter, R

    Ferland, G. J., Porter, R. L., van Hoof, P. A. M., et al. 2013. http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.4485

    2013 arXiv

  28. [36]

    C., & Koss, M

    Foord, A., Gultekin, K., Runnoe, J. C., & Koss, M. J. 2020, 10.3847/1538-4357/abce5d

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    M., et al

    Freudling , W., Romaniello , M., Bramich , D. M., et al. 2013, , 559, A96, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322494

    2013 doi

  30. [38]

    R., Rigopoulou , D., et al

    Garc \' a-Bernete , I., Donnan , F. R., Rigopoulou , D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.16301. 2502.16301

    2025

  31. [39]

    García-Bernete, I., Pereira-Santaella, M., González-Alfonso, E., et al. 2024. http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.02763

    2024

  32. [40]

    P., Bautz, M

    Garmire, G. P., Bautz, M. W., Ford, P. G., Nousek, J. A., & Ricker, G. R. 2003, Advanced CCD imaging spectrometer (ACIS) instrument on the Chandra X-ray Observatory. http://spiedl.org/terms

    2003

  33. [41]

    2022, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac695a

    Ginsburg, A., Sokolov, V., de Val-Borro, M., et al. 2022, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac695a

    2022 doi

  34. [42]

    Goldader, J. D. 1997, 10.1086/118374

    1997 doi

  35. [44]

    L., De Zotti , G., Silva , L., Bressan , A., & Danese , L

    Granato , G. L., De Zotti , G., Silva , L., Bressan , A., & Danese , L. 2004, , 600, 580, 10.1086/379875

    2004 doi

  36. [45]

    L., Silva , L., Lapi , A., et al

    Granato , G. L., Silva , L., Lapi , A., et al. 2006, , 368, L72, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00160.x

    2006

  37. [46]

    Gunawardhana , M. L. P., Brinchmann , J., Weilbacher , P. M., et al. 2020, , 497, 3860, 10.1093/mnras/staa2158

    2020 doi

  38. [47]

    Hernquist , L., & Spergel , D. N. 1992, , 399, L117, 10.1086/186621

    1992 doi

  39. [48]

    L., Hill, R

    Hinshaw, G., Weiland, J. L., Hill, R. S., et al. 2009, Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series, 180, 225, 10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/225

    2009 doi

  40. [49]

    F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T

    Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., et al. 2005, 10.1086/499298

    2005 doi

  41. [50]

    F., Richards , G

    Hopkins , P. F., Richards , G. T., & Hernquist , L. 2007, , 654, 731, 10.1086/509629

    2007 doi

  42. [51]

    A., et al

    Inami, H., Armus, L., Surace, J. A., et al. 2010, 10.1088/0004-6256/140/1/63

    2010 doi

  43. [52]

    2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 940, L6, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9389

    Inami, H., Surace, J., Armus, L., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 940, L6, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9389

    2022 doi

  44. [53]

    B., Teng, S

    Iwasawa, K., Sanders, D. B., Teng, S. H., et al. 2011, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 529, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015264

    2011 doi

  45. [55]

    M., Tremonti , C., et al

    Kauffmann , G., Heckman , T. M., Tremonti , C., et al. 2003, , 346, 1055, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x

    2003

  46. [56]

    2022, , 938, 87, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8794

    Kawamuro , T., Ricci , C., Imanishi , M., et al. 2022, , 938, 87, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8794

    2022 doi

  47. [57]

    Kennicutt, R. C. 1998, STAR FORMATION IN GALAXIES ALONG THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE

    1998

  48. [58]

    J., Dopita , M

    Kewley , L. J., Dopita , M. A., Leitherer , C., et al. 2013, , 774, 100, 10.1088/0004-637X/774/2/100

    2013 doi

  49. [59]

    J., Dopita, M

    Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., et al. 2001, THEORETICAL MODELING OF STARBURST GALAXIES

    2001

  50. [60]

    J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., & Heckman, T

    Kewley, L. J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., & Heckman, T. 2008, The Host Galaxies and Classification of Active Galactic Nuclei

    2008

  51. [61]

    D., Brightman, M., Nandra, K., et al

    Kocevski, D. D., Brightman, M., Nandra, K., et al. 2015, Astrophysical Journal, 814, 10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/104

    2015 doi

  52. [62]

    2020, , 491, 889, 10.1093/mnras/stz2594

    Kopsacheili , M., Zezas , A., & Leonidaki , I. 2020, , 491, 889, 10.1093/mnras/stz2594

    2020 doi

  53. [63]

    2006, , 650, 42, 10.1086/507122

    Lapi , A., Shankar , F., Mao , J., et al. 2006, , 650, 42, 10.1086/507122

    2006 doi

  54. [64]

    L., Díaz-Santos, T., Armus, L., et al

    Larson, K. L., Díaz-Santos, T., Armus, L., et al. 2019, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5dc3

    2019 doi

  55. [65]

    D., et al

    Leitherer , C., Schaerer , D., Goldader , J. D., et al. 1999, , 123, 3, 10.1086/313233

    1999 doi

  56. [66]

    M., Jonsson , P., Cox , T

    Lotz , J. M., Jonsson , P., Cox , T. J., & Primack , J. R. 2008, , 391, 1137, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14004.x

    2008

  57. [67]

    A., Rosales-Ortega, F

    Marino, R. A., Rosales-Ortega, F. F., Sánchez, S. F., et al. 2013, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 559, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321956

    2013 doi

  58. [68]

    D., Springel, V., & Hernquist, L

    Matteo, T. D., Springel, V., & Hernquist, L. 2005, 10.1038/nature03335

    2005 doi

  59. [69]

    M., Kewley , L

    Medling , A. M., Kewley , L. J., Calzetti , D., et al. 2021, , 923, 160, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2ebb

    2021 doi

  60. [70]

    2005, , 429, 581, 10.1051/0004-6361:20047106

    Meynet , G., & Maeder , A. 2005, , 429, 581, 10.1051/0004-6361:20047106

    2005 doi

  61. [71]

    C., & Hernquist, L

    Mihos, J. C., & Hernquist, L. 1995, Gasdynamics and Starbursts in Major Mergers

    1995

  62. [72]

    L., & Bressan, A

    Mollá, M., García-Vargas, M. L., & Bressan, A. 2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 398, 451, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15160.x

    2009

  63. [73]

    2006, , 637, 138, 10.1086/498257

    Monreal-Ibero , A., Arribas , S., & Colina , L. 2006, , 637, 138, 10.1086/498257

    2006 doi

  64. [74]

    2010, , 517, A28, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913239

    Monreal-Ibero , A., Arribas , S., Colina , L., et al. 2010, , 517, A28, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913239

    2010 doi

  65. [75]

    2007, 10.1093/pasj/59.sp2.S401

    Onaka, T., Matsuhara, H., Wada, T., et al. 2007, 10.1093/pasj/59.sp2.S401

    2007 doi

  66. [76]

    Osterbrock , D. E. 1989, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    1989

  67. [77]

    L., Siemiginowska, A., et al

    Park, T., Kashyap, V. L., Siemiginowska, A., et al. 2006, Bayesian Estimation of Hardness Ratios: Modeling and Computations

    2006

  68. [78]

    2024, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449982

    Pereira-Santaella, M., García-Bernete, I., González-Alfonso, E., et al. 2024, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449982

    2024 doi

  69. [79]

    Pierce , J. C. S., Tadhunter , C., Ramos Almeida , C., et al. 2023, , 522, 1736, 10.1093/mnras/stad455

    2023 doi

  70. [80]

    S., & Grebel , E

    Pilyugin , L. S., & Grebel , E. K. 2016, , 457, 3678, 10.1093/mnras/stw238

    2016 doi

  71. [81]

    Quinn , P. J. 1984, , 279, 596, 10.1086/161924

    1984 doi

  72. [82]

    N., Inskip , K

    Ramos Almeida , C., Tadhunter , C. N., Inskip , K. J., et al. 2011, , 410, 1550, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17542.x

    2011

  73. [83]

    C., Pfeifle, R

    Ricci, C., Privon, G. C., Pfeifle, R. W., et al. 2021, 10.1093/mnras/stab2052

    2021 doi

  74. [84]

    2023, , 952, L28, 10.3847/2041-8213/acda27

    Ricci , C., Chang , C.-S., Kawamuro , T., et al. 2023, , 952, L28, 10.3847/2041-8213/acda27

    2023 doi

  75. [85]

    A., Dopita , M

    Rich , J. A., Dopita , M. A., Kewley , L. J., & Rupke , D. S. N. 2010, , 721, 505, 10.1088/0004-637X/721/1/505

    2010 doi

  76. [86]

    A., Kewley , L

    Rich , J. A., Kewley , L. J., & Dopita , M. A. 2011, , 734, 87, 10.1088/0004-637X/734/2/87

    2011 doi

  77. [87]

    A., Kewley, L

    Rich, J. A., Kewley, L. J., & Dopita, M. A. 2015, Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series, 221, 10.1088/0067-0049/221/2/28

    2015 doi

  78. [88]

    M., et al

    Ruby , M., M \"u ller-S \'a nchez , F., Comerford , J. M., et al. 2024, , 535, 763, 10.1093/mnras/stae2320

    2024 doi

  79. [89]

    P., & Stone, N

    Ryu, T., Perna, R., Haiman, Z., Ostriker, J. P., & Stone, N. C. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 473, 3410, 10.1093/MNRAS/STX2524

    2018 doi

  80. [90]

    B., Mazzarella, J

    Sanders, D. B., Mazzarella, J. M., Kim, D.-C., Surace, J. A., & Soifer, B. T. 2003, The IRAS Revised Bright Galaxy Sample (RBGS). http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/

    2003

  81. [91]

    B., Soifer, B

    Sanders, D. B., Soifer, B. T., Elias, J. H., et al. 1988, ULTRALUMINOUS INFRARED GALAXIES AND THE ORIGIN OF QUASARS

    1988

  82. [92]

    2007, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 382, 1415, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12487.x

    Schawinski, K., Thomas, D., Sarzi, M., et al. 2007, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 382, 1415, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12487.x

    2007

  83. [93]

    J., Finkbeiner , D

    Schlegel , D. J., Finkbeiner , D. P., & Davis , M. 1998, , 500, 525, 10.1086/305772

    1998 doi

  84. [94]

    J., Hwang, H

    Sohn, J., Geller, M. J., Hwang, H. S., Zahid, H. J., & Lee, M. G. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 225, 23, 10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/23

    2016 doi

  85. [95]

    M., Perea, J

    Solanes, J. M., Perea, J. D., Valentí-Rojas, G., et al. 2018, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833767

    2018 doi

  86. [96]

    A., et al

    Stierwalt , S., Armus , L., Surace , J. A., et al. 2013, , 206, 1, 10.1088/0067-0049/206/1/1

    2013 doi

  87. [97]

    D., & Fraternali, F

    Teodoro, E. D., & Fraternali, F. 2015. http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.07834

    2015 arXiv

  88. [98]

    A., Quataert , E., & Murray , N

    Thompson , T. A., Quataert , E., & Murray , N. 2005, , 630, 167, 10.1086/431923

    2005 doi

  89. [99]

    1972, 10.1086/151823

    Toomre, A. 1972, 10.1086/151823

    1972 doi

  90. [100]

    E., Gallagher, S

    Tzanavaris, P., Hornschemeier, A. E., Gallagher, S. C., et al. 2010, 10.1088/0004-637X/716/1/556

    2010 doi

  91. [101]

    J., et al

    Vardoulaki, E., Charmandaris, V., Murphy, E. J., et al. 2015, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 574, 10.1051/0004-6361/201424125

    2015 doi

  92. [102]

    2016, 10.1093/mnras/stw2231

    Vazdekis, A., Koleva, M., Ricciardelli, E., Röck, B., & Falcón-Barroso, J. 2016, 10.1093/mnras/stw2231

    2016 doi

  93. [103]

    Veilleux , S., & Osterbrock , D. E. 1987, , 63, 295, 10.1086/191166

    1987 doi

  94. [104]

    Veilleux, S., Rupke, D. S. N., Kim, D. C., et al. 2009, 10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/628

    2009 doi

  95. [105]

    2018, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 619, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833668

    Venturi, G., Nardini, E., Marconi, A., et al. 2018, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 619, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833668

    2018 doi

  96. [106]

    M., Monreal-Ibero , A., Verhamme , A., et al

    Weilbacher , P. M., Monreal-Ibero , A., Verhamme , A., et al. 2018, , 611, A95, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731669

    2018 doi

  97. [107]

    M., Palsa , R., Streicher , O., et al

    Weilbacher , P. M., Palsa , R., Streicher , O., et al. 2020, , 641, A28, 10.1051/0004-6361/202037855

    2020 doi

  98. [108]

    Q., Wu, H., Zhu, Y

    Wen, X. Q., Wu, H., Zhu, Y. N., et al. 2013, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 433, 10.1093/mnras/stt939

    2013 doi

  99. [109]

    2022, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 661, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142854

    Wu, H., Wu, Z., Sotnikova, Y., et al. 2022, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 661, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142854

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.