Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 cited by

The January 2010 flare of Mrk421: Insights from a stochastic acceleration model

T0 review · 1 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-05-09 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Spectral variability in Mrk 421's January 2010 flare aligns with stochastic acceleration of particles.

desk verdict The paper fits LPPL plus Maxwellian pile-up to the January 2010 Mrk 421 SEDs and links the pile-up to the acceleration-cooling transition on three nights, but without any reported statistical test against the simpler LPPL-only case. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.20480 v1 pith:PTSWB7W2 submitted 2026-04-22 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA

MAGIC collaboration: K. Abe , S. Abe , J. Abhir , A. Abhishek , V. A. Acciari , A. Aguasca-Cabot , I. Agudo , I. Albanese
show 185 more authors
T. Aniello L. A. Antonelli A. Arbet-Engels C. Arcaro T. T. H. Arnesen A. Babić C. Bakshi U. Barres de Almeida J. A. Barrio L. Barrios-Jiménez I. Batković J. Baxter J. Becerra González W. Bednarek E. Bernardini J. Bernete A. Berti J. Besenrieder C. Bigongiari A. Biland O. Blanch G. Bonnoli Ž. Bošnjak E. Bronzini I. Burelli A. Campoy-Ordaz A. Carosi R. Carosi M. Carretero-Castrillo D. Cerasole G. Ceribella A. Cerviño Y. Chai G. Chon A. Cifuentes Santos J. L. Contreras J. Cortina S. Covino G. D'Amico P. Da Vela F. Dazzi A. De Angelis B. De Lotto R. de Menezes M. Delfino J. Delgado C. Delgado Mendez F. Di Pierro R. Di Tria L. Di Venere A. Dinesh D. Dominis Prester A. Donini D. Dorner M. Doro L. Eisenberger D. Elsaesser L. Foffano L. Font F. Frías García-Lago Y. Fukazawa S. García Soto S. Gasparyan M. Gaug J. G. Giesbrecht Paiva N. Giglietto F. Giordano P. Gliwny T. Gradetzke R. Grau J. G. Green P. Günther D. Hadasch A. Hahn G. Harutyunyan T. Hassan J. Herrera Llorente D. Hrupec D. Israyelyan J. Jahanvi I. Jiménez Martínez J. Jiménez Quiles J. Jormanainen S. Kankkunen T. Kayanoki G. W. Kluge J. Konrad P. M. Kouch H. Kubo J. Kushida M. Láinez A. Lamastra E. Lindfors S. Lombardi F. Longo R. López-Coto M. López-Moya A. López-Oramas S. Loporchio L. Lulić E. Lyard P. Majumdar M. Makariev M. Mallamaci G. Maneva M. Manganaro S. Mangano M. Mariotti M. Martínez P. Maruševec D. Mazin S. Menchiari J. Méndez Gallego S. Menon D. Miceli J. M. Miranda R. Mirzoyan M. Molero González E. Molina H. A. Mondal A. Moralejo C. Nanci A. Negro V. Neustroev M. Nievas Rosillo C. Nigro L. Nikolić K. Nilsson S. Nozaki A. Okumura J. Otero-Santos S. Paiano D. Paneque R. Paoletti J. M. Paredes M. Peresano M. Persic M. Pihet G. Pirola F. Podobnik P. G. Prada Moroni E. Prandini W. Rhode M. Ribó J. Rico A. Roy N. Sahakyan F. G. Saturni F. Schiavone K. Schmitz F. Schmuckermaier A. Sciaccaluga G. Silvestri A. Simongini J. Sitarek V. Sliusar D. Sobczynska A. Stamerra J. Strišković D. Strom Y. Suda M. Takahashi R. Takeishi J. Tartera Barberà P. Temnikov T. Terzić M. Teshima A. Tutone S. Ubach M. Vazquez Acosta S. Ventura G. Verna I. Viale A. Vigliano C. F. Vigorito E. Visentin V. Vitale M. Vorbrugg I. Vovk R. Walter C. Walther F. Wersig P. K. H. Yeung M. Perri A. Tramacere
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.GA
keywords Mrk421blazarflarestochasticaccelerationspectralenergydistributionleptonicmodelpile-upTeVgammarays
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper examines the temporal evolution of spectra from the blazar Mrk 421 during its high state in January 2010 to understand particle acceleration and emission region properties. It models the spectral energy distributions using leptonic log-parabola with power-law branch distributions that include pile-up components, as expected in stochastic acceleration scenarios. This approach fits the observed SED changes and cross-band correlations better than standard single-zone models, suggesting a transition to cooling-dominated phases on specific nights. The findings connect the data to theoretical predictions from diffusion equation simulations, providing insight into the rapid variability mechanisms in active galactic nuclei.

What carries the argument

The LPPL (log-parabola with low-energy power-law) distribution augmented by a Maxwellian pile-up component within a single-zone leptonic synchrotron self-Compton framework, fitted via JetSeT software and a simplified temporal evolution model.

What would settle it

If future data shows spectral features or correlations that cannot be reproduced by the LPPL plus pile-up model in a single zone, or if multi-wavelength campaigns reveal significant hadronic signatures, the interpretation would be challenged.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The multi-wavelength observations reveal that the standard LPPL distribution develops a Maxwellian pile-up component at the transition from acceleration to cooling dominated phase on three nights in the dataset. The sequential snapshot evolution SED model, incorporating an expanding emission region in some tests, shows phenomenology that agrees well with theoretical and numerical studies on temporal evolution using the diffusion equation approach.

Load-bearing premise

That a single emission zone with purely leptonic processes and the specified particle distributions can account for all observed spectral features without contributions from hadronic processes or external photon fields.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The model captures the strong variability and correlations between very-high energy gamma rays and X-rays seen in the light curves.
  • Three nights show evidence of the pile-up feature indicating the acceleration-cooling transition.
  • The overall SED evolution matches expectations from stochastic acceleration theory.
  • Testing an expanding emission region provides additional context but the core fits rely on the particle distribution changes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar modeling could apply to other blazar flares to test if stochastic acceleration is a common mechanism.
  • Future observations with higher sensitivity might confirm the pile-up component directly in the spectra.
  • The single-zone assumption implies that multi-zone effects are not dominant during this flare period.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes the January 2010 high-state flare of Mrk 421 using multi-wavelength data. SEDs are fitted in JetSeT with a single-zone leptonic model based on log-parabola plus low-energy power-law (LPPL) distributions augmented by Maxwellian pile-up components. A simplified temporal evolution model and an expanding emission-region scenario are developed and compared to the observed SED changes and cross-band correlations. The central claim is that the spectral variability agrees with stochastic acceleration, with the LPPL developing a Maxwellian pile-up at the acceleration-to-cooling transition on three specific nights, and that the overall phenomenology matches theoretical expectations from diffusion-equation studies.

Significance. If the modeling is robust, the work supplies a physics-motivated interpretation of blazar flare evolution that links observations directly to stochastic acceleration predictions. The use of established fitting software (JetSeT) and explicit comparison to numerical simulation literature are positive features that could help bridge data and theory in AGN jet studies.

major comments (1)
  1. [SED fitting results and temporal evolution model (abstract and main results sections)] The assertion that a Maxwellian pile-up component appears on three nights (abstract and results describing the SED fits) rests on visual or qualitative agreement after adjusting LPPL curvature, peak, pile-up amplitude and location parameters. No Δχ², likelihood-ratio test, AIC/BIC comparison, or other quantitative metric is reported to establish that the extra pile-up parameters are required by the data rather than optional. This directly affects the load-bearing claim that the distribution “develops a Maxwellian pile-up component at the transition” on those nights.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The assertion that a Maxwellian pile-up component appears on three nights (abstract and results describing the SED fits) rests on visual or qualitative agreement after adjusting LPPL curvature, peak, pile-up amplitude and location parameters. No Δχ², likelihood-ratio test, AIC/BIC comparison, or other quantitative metric is reported to establish that the extra pile-up parameters are required by the data rather than optional. This directly affects the load-bearing claim that the distribution “develops a Maxwellian pile-up component at the transition” on those nights.

    Authors: We agree that the original manuscript presented the inclusion of the Maxwellian pile-up component on the basis of physically motivated fits and visual agreement with the data rather than formal statistical model comparison. The pile-up parameters were introduced following expectations from stochastic acceleration theory and the diffusion-equation literature, and the overall SED evolution was additionally constrained by the observed cross-band correlations and light-curve behavior. To address the referee’s concern directly, the revised manuscript will include AIC and BIC comparisons (and, where applicable, likelihood-ratio tests) between the baseline LPPL and LPPL-plus-pile-up models for the three nights in question. These quantitative metrics will be reported in the results section and will be used to support or qualify the claim in the abstract. We will also ensure that the wording of the claim reflects the outcome of the statistical tests. revision: yes

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Pile-up identification and stochastic-acceleration agreement derived from SED fits without statistical validation of model necessity

  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "Our analysis suggests that the standard LPPL distribution develops a Maxwellian pile-up component at the transition from acceleration to cooling dominated phase on 3 nights in the dataset, as also hinted by the very-high energy and X-ray light curves."

    The Maxwellian pile-up is an explicit component of the LPPL+pile-up distribution that is fitted to each night's SED; its reported presence on three specific nights is therefore a direct consequence of the model form adopted and the parameter values obtained, rather than an independent prediction tested against a baseline (pure LPPL) model.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "We find the spectral variability to be well in agreement with stochastic acceleration. ... The resulting phenomenology of our sequential snapshot evolution SED model agrees well with theoretical and numerical simulation studies on temporal evolution using the diffusion equation approach."

    The SED evolution model is constructed from the same LPPL+pile-up distributions that are fitted to the data; the reported agreement with stochastic-acceleration phenomenology is therefore obtained by fitting the very functional forms whose predictions are then claimed to be confirmed.

full rationale

The paper fits observed SEDs in JetSeT using the LPPL+pile-up functional form motivated by stochastic acceleration theory, then reports that the data show the pile-up developing on three nights at the acceleration-cooling transition. This identification is obtained directly from the chosen parametrization and its time evolution; no quantitative model-comparison statistic is supplied to demonstrate that the extra pile-up parameters are required by the data rather than optional. The resulting claim of agreement with stochastic acceleration therefore reduces in part to the input model choice and fitted parameters.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that a single-zone leptonic model with a specific functional form for the electron distribution is sufficient, plus several fitted parameters that are adjusted to the data.

free parameters (3)
  • LPPL curvature and peak parameters
    Fitted to each night's SED using JetSeT
  • Pile-up amplitude and location
    Introduced to reproduce the high-energy part of the SED on three nights
  • Emission-region expansion rate
    Tested as a free parameter in the temporal-evolution model
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Leptonic synchrotron self-Compton emission dominates the observed SED
    Stated as the modeling framework throughout the abstract
  • domain assumption Stochastic acceleration produces the observed log-parabola plus pile-up distributions
    Invoked to interpret the fitted distributions as physical

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The January 2010 flare of Mrk421: Insights from a stochastic acceleration model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PTSWB7W2

@misc{pith2026260420480,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The January 2010 flare of Mrk421: Insights from a stochastic acceleration model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PTSWB7W2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.20480}
}
read the original abstract

Mrk421 displayed its highest flux state ever observed in February of 2010 with very high TeV fluxes and interesting cross-band correlations and a spectral energy distribution (SED) evolution not entirely consistent with the standard single zone leptonic synchrotron self-Compton model. The source was already in a high state in January 2010 and displayed strong variability in the days preceding the highest state. We study the temporal evolution of the spectra in January to extract information about the particle dynamics and the physical properties of the emission region. We build up on the temporal variability and correlations studied in the previous work (MAGIC collaboration - Abe et al. 2025) and attempt to improve the SED model fits with a physics oriented approach. The multi-wavelength data was processed and the SEDs were fit using JetSeT. The SED evolution and cross band correlations were modelled using leptonic log-parabola with a low energy power-law branch (LPPL) and pile-up distributions that are predicted in a stochastic acceleration scenario. A simplified temporal evolution model was developed and fit to the SEDs and the resulting trends and phenomenology were characterised in context of theoretical literature. An expanding emission region model was also tested. We find the spectral variability to be well in agreement with stochastic acceleration. Our analysis suggests that the standard LPPL distribution develops a Maxwellian pile-up component at the transition from acceleration to cooling dominated phase on 3 nights in the dataset, as also hinted by the very-high energy and X-ray light curves. The resulting phenomenology of our sequential snapshot evolution SED model agrees well with theoretical and numerical simulation studies on temporal evolution using the diffusion equation approach.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20480 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. VHE and X-ray LC of Mrk 421 during the 2009-2010 MAGIC observations campaign. The data are daily binned and taken from Abe et al. (2025). Our broadband SED modelling is performed over the period highlighted with a vertical red band (January 2010) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. MWL LC during January 2010 from radio to VHE. The data are taken from Abe et al. (2025). The top axis is marked with date colour key which is consistent across plots and tables in the paper. 2.1. γ-ray bands We binned the spectral data according to the availability of the MAGIC telescope observations. There are 16 nights in our SED dataset starting from 08 January 2010 until 26 January 2010 and the MWL SEDs are labe… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The anti-correlation between the peak curvature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The top panel illustrates the optical-to-X-ray SED using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: LPPL model results. The marker with errorbar represents [0.15, 0.50, 0.85] quantiles of 104 MCMC realisations and the short horizontal dashes represent [0.01, 0.99] quantile range. Article number, page 8 of 25 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: SED fits: combined model. The best fit and MCMC range for the SED (top subplot) and the EED (bottom subplot) for each observation date in January 2010 are shown. The residuals of the model and the χ 2 , reduced χ 2 (χ 2 red) and degrees-of-freedom (NDoF) of the fit are…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: SED fits: combined model. Continued from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Lepton distribution curvature (r3p) at the Lorentz factor of leptons emitting at the peak of the synchrotron bump (γ3p). The fit highlights the trend between spectral curvature and peak energy for the sub-sample of days with LPPL EED in the com￾bined model, with the pi…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Trend for the synchrotron peak frequency vs peak flux, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Parameter evolution for the expanding blob model. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Temporal evolution of the radius of the emitting region [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: B vs R index fit for the expanding blob model done using scipy curvefit. m = −1.13, B0 = 8.0mG, R ′ = 5.9 × 1016cm. Colour key and markers same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: N vs R index fit for the expanding blob model. m = −1.75, N0 = 0.067cm−3 , R ′ = 5.0 × 1016cm. Colour key and markers same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Comparison of the particle cooling time scales (in blob [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: SED fits: expanding blob model. Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: SED fits: expanding blob model. Continued from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_16.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spin-wave hybridization in bismuth iron garnet Mie spheres induced by the inverse Faraday effect

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The inverse Faraday effect in BIG Mie spheres enables symmetry-selective hybridization of spin-wave modes with opposite parity, producing MHz-scale splittings near optical resonances.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , year = 1970, month = jan, volume =

    Reviews of Modern Physics , year = 1970, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.42.237 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.42.237 1970

  2. [2]

    A new pile-up mechanism for relativistic electronspectra

    An explanation of abrupt cutoffs in the optical-infrared spectra of non-thermal sources. A new pile-up mechanism for relativistic electronspectra. , keywords =

    work page

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    A viable mechanism to establish relativistic thermal particle distribution functions in cosmic sources. , keywords =

    work page

  4. [4]

    Cosmic-Ray Transport and Acceleration. I. Derivation of the Kinetic Equation and Application to Cosmic Rays in Static Cold Media. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/167009 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/167009

  5. [5]

    J., Finkbeiner, D

    , keywords =. doi:10.1086/305772 , archiveprefix =. astro-ph/9710327 , primaryclass =

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1086/305772

  6. [6]

    J., Ho, L

    , keywords =. doi:10.1086/345083 , archiveprefix =. astro-ph/0209562 , primaryclass =

    work page doi:10.1086/345083

  7. [7]

    , year =

    On characterizing the variability properties of X-ray light curves from active galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07042.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0307420 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07042.x 2003

  8. [8]

    2004a, A&A, 413, 489, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031558

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031558 , archiveprefix =. astro-ph/0312260 , primaryclass =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031558

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053644 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053644 , archiveprefix =. astro-ph/0511673 , primaryclass =

    doi

  2. [10]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200811157 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200811157 , archiveprefix =. 0811.4246 , primaryclass =

    doi

  3. [11]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.251101 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.251101 , archiveprefix =. 0912.0973 , primaryclass =

    doi

  4. [12]

    doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15898.x , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15898.x , archiveprefix =. 0909.0932 , primaryclass =

    2009 doi

  5. [13]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103 , archiveprefix =. 1012.4804 , primaryclass =

    doi arXiv

  6. [14]

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/29 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/29 , archiveprefix =. 1011.3111 , primaryclass =

    doi

  7. [15]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118569 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118569 , archiveprefix =. 1203.3850 , primaryclass =

    doi

  8. [16]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321858 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321858 , archiveprefix =. 1310.4973 , primaryclass =

    doi

  9. [17]

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/14 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/14 , archiveprefix =. 1309.0755 , primaryclass =

    doi

  10. [18]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424216 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424216 , archiveprefix =. 1502.02650 , primaryclass =

    doi

  11. [19]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/38 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/38 , archiveprefix =. 1505.00933 , primaryclass =

    doi

  12. [20]

    doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2015.02.005 , archiveprefix =

    Astroparticle Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2015.02.005 , archiveprefix =. 1409.5594 , primaryclass =

    2015 doi

  13. [22]

    doi:10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/61 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/61 , archiveprefix =. 1506.02892 , primaryclass =

    doi

  14. [23]

    doi:10.3390/galaxies7010020 , archiveprefix =

    Galaxies , keywords =. doi:10.3390/galaxies7010020 , archiveprefix =. 1901.04178 , primaryclass =

    1901 doi

  15. [24]

    doi:10.22323/1.354.0032 , archiveprefix =

    High Energy Phenomena in Relativistic Outflows VII , year = 2019, month = jul, eid =. doi:10.22323/1.354.0032 , archiveprefix =. 1909.13106 , primaryclass =

    2019 doi

  16. [25]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1292 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1292 , archiveprefix =. 1905.01043 , primaryclass =

    1905 doi

  17. [26]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935557 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935557 , archiveprefix =. 2101.10651 , primaryclass =

    doi

  18. [27]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039616 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039616 , archiveprefix =. 2102.08952 , primaryclass =

    doi

  19. [28]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141062 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141062 , archiveprefix =. 2108.12271 , primaryclass =

    doi

  20. [29]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1445 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1445 , archiveprefix =. 2105.12480 , primaryclass =

    doi

  21. [30]

    doi:10.3390/galaxies10010035 , archiveprefix =

    Galaxies , keywords =. doi:10.3390/galaxies10010035 , archiveprefix =. 2202.07490 , primaryclass =

    doi

  22. [31]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd2d0 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd2d0 , archiveprefix =. 2305.02860 , primaryclass =

    doi

  23. [32]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stae643 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae643 , archiveprefix =. 2402.19377 , primaryclass =

    doi

  24. [33]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555109 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555109 , archiveprefix =. 2508.18008 , primaryclass =

    doi

  25. [34]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.08686 , archiveprefix =

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.08686 , archiveprefix =. 2509.08686 , primaryclass =

    doi

  26. [35]

    Acciari, V. A. and Ansoldi, S. and Antonelli, L. A. and Engels, A. Arbet and Baack, D. and Babić, A. and Banerjee, B. and de Almeida, U. Barres and Barrio, J. A. and González, J. Becerra and Bednarek, W. and Bellizzi, L. K. and Bernardini, E. and Berti, A. and Besenrieder, J. ...

    2020 doi

  27. [36]

    and Paneque, D

    Baloković, M. and Paneque, D. and Madejski, G. and Furniss, A. and Chiang, J. and Ajello, M. and Alexander, D. M. and Barret, D. and Blandford, R. D. and Boggs, S. E. and Christensen, F. E. and Craig, W. W. and Forster, K. and Giommi, P. and Grefenstette, B. and Hailey, C. and...

    2016 doi

  28. [37]

    doi:10.1086/505319 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1086/505319 , archiveprefix =. astro-ph/0604504 , primaryclass =

    doi

  29. [38]

    Begelman, M C and Blandford, R D and Rees, M J , title =. Rev. Mod. Phys.; (United States) , volume =. 1984 , month =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.56.255 , url =

    1984 doi

  30. [39]

    Carnerero, M. I. and Raiteri, C. M. and Villata, M. and Acosta-Pulido, J. A. and Larionov, V. M. and Smith, P. S. and D'Ammando, F. and Agudo, I. and Arévalo, M. J. and Bachev, R. and Barnes, J. and Boeva, S. and Bozhilov, V. and Carosati, D. and Casadio, C. and Chen, W. P. an...

    2017 doi

  31. [40]

    and Primack, J

    Domínguez, A. and Primack, J. R. and Rosario, D. J. and Prada, F. and Gilmore, R. C. and Faber, S. M. and Koo, D. C. and Somerville, R. S. and Pérez-Torres, M. A. and Pérez-González, P. and Huang, J.-S. and Davis, M. and Guhathakurta, P. and Barmby, P. and Conselice, C. J. and...

    2011 doi

  32. [41]

    1202.3665 , doi =

    emcee: The MCMC Hammer , journal =. 1202.3665 , doi =

  33. [42]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451624 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451624 , archiveprefix =. 2501.03831 , primaryclass =

    doi

  34. [43]

    doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01828.x , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01828.x , archiveprefix =. astro-ph/9804103 , primaryclass =

    1998 doi

  35. [44]

    Galaxies , volume =

    Prandini, Elisa and Ghisellini, Gabriele , title =. Galaxies , volume =. 2022 , number =

    2022

  36. [45]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8407 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8407 , archiveprefix =. 1711.03983 , primaryclass =

    doi

  37. [46]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab6612 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab6612 , archiveprefix =. 2002.03567 , primaryclass =

    2002 doi

  38. [47]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424811 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424811 , archiveprefix =. 1412.3576 , primaryclass =

    doi

  39. [48]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141004 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141004 , archiveprefix =. 2106.05516 , primaryclass =

    doi

  40. [49]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834603 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834603 , archiveprefix =. 2001.07729 , primaryclass =

    2001 doi

  41. [50]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041864 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041864 , archiveprefix =. astro-ph/0504140 , primaryclass =

    doi

  42. [51]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629178 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629178 , archiveprefix =. 1610.06175 , primaryclass =

    doi

  43. [52]

    doi:10.1063/1.32074 , adsurl =

    Particle Acceleration Mechanisms in Astrophysics , year = 1979, editor =. doi:10.1063/1.32074 , adsurl =

    1979 doi

  44. [53]

    doi:10.1086/588813 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1086/588813 , archiveprefix =. 0803.0989 , primaryclass =

    doi

  45. [54]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066723 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066723 , archiveprefix =. astro-ph/0702151 , primaryclass =

    doi

  46. [55]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200810865 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200810865 , archiveprefix =. 0901.4124 , primaryclass =

    doi

  47. [56]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/739/2/66 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/739/2/66 , archiveprefix =. 1107.1879 , primaryclass =

    doi

  48. [57]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142003 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142003 , archiveprefix =. 2112.03941 , primaryclass =

    doi

  49. [58]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1182 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1182 , archiveprefix =. 2007.12661 , primaryclass =

    2007 doi

  50. [59]

    Megan and Padovani, Paolo , title =

    Urry, C. Megan and Padovani, Paolo , title =. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , abstract =. 1995 , month =. doi:10.1086/133630 , url =

    1995 doi

  51. [60]

    doi:10.1007/s11214-005-5095-4 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-005-5095-4 , archiveprefix =. astro-ph/0507413 , primaryclass =

    doi

  52. [61]

    doi:10.1063/1.3621807 , archiveprefix =

    Gamma Ray Bursts 2010 , year = 2011, editor =. doi:10.1063/1.3621807 , archiveprefix =. 1102.4717 , primaryclass =

    2010 doi

  53. [62]

    doi:10.1086/316293 , archiveprefix =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1086/316293 , archiveprefix =. astro-ph/9809387 , primaryclass =

    doi

  54. [63]

    , year = 2025, volume = 700, pages =

    Looking into the jet cone of the neutrino-associated very high-energy blazar PKS 1424+240 , doi =. , year = 2025, volume = 700, pages =

    2025

  55. [64]

    Proceedings, 33rd International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2013): Rio de Janeiro, Brazil , pages =

    MARS, the MAGIC analysis and reconstruction software , author =. Proceedings, 33rd International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2013): Rio de Janeiro, Brazil , pages =

Pith tools

Reviewed May 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.