pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.00287 · v1 · pith:PW4SLXHGnew · submitted 2026-05-29 · 💻 cs.MA · cs.DC

Leveraging the Learning Curve: Reusing Existing Architectural Patterns to Design and Implement MAS

Arthur Casals , Anarosa A. F. Brand\~ao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 19:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.MA cs.DC
keywords multi-agent systemsdistributed systemsarchitectural patternssoftware engineeringMASlearning outcomesagent concepts
0
0 comments X

The pith

Introducing a minimal set of agent concepts into distributed systems improves the engineering of multi-agent systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that a minimal set of agent-related concepts introduced into the distributed systems domain can improve MAS engineering by combining DS techniques with agent theory. This is shown through designing a distributed MAS using an existing DS architectural pattern augmented with these concepts and through teaching the approach in graduate courses. Students, most without prior DS or agent experience, successfully implemented MAS and achieved average grades above 80 percent. A sympathetic reader would care because this reuses established engineering practices for the collaborative nature of modern AI systems.

Core claim

We propose that introducing a minimal set of agent-related concepts into the Distributed Systems domain can improve the engineering of modern MAS by leveraging techniques from DS engineering with established agent theory. This is validated by incorporating the concepts into a DS architectural pattern for design and by successful student implementations in courses with high average grades.

What carries the argument

A minimal set of agent-related concepts added to distributed systems architectural patterns.

If this is right

  • DS patterns can be reused for MAS design and implementation.
  • MAS can be taught effectively to students without prior knowledge using DS tools.
  • Modern AI systems benefit from consistent use of agent research and DS techniques.
  • The collaborative nature of agents aligns with distributed systems characteristics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach may lower the barrier for developing MAS in industry settings.
  • The minimal concepts could be formalized into new design methodologies.
  • Similar minimal sets might bridge other AI subfields with established engineering domains.

Load-bearing premise

The student success and high grades result from the minimal agent concepts rather than course structure or chosen tools.

What would settle it

Conducting the same courses without introducing the minimal agent concepts and observing if grades and implementation success remain above 80 percent on average.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.00287 by Anarosa A. F. Brand\~ao, Arthur Casals.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIGURE 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIGURE 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIGURE 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIGURE 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIGURE 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in AI have led to the development of specialized systems related to multi-agent systems (MAS). However, the inherently collaborative nature of agents is often overlooked, and many of these specialized systems are used as components by other AI systems. From a software engineering perspective, this context can benefit from aligning the architectural characteristics of distributed systems with the inherently distributed nature of MAS. We propose that introducing a minimal set of agent-related concepts into the Distributed Systems (DS) domain can improve the engineering of modern MAS by leveraging techniques from DS engineering with established agent theory. In this study, we recapitulated the common origins of MAS and DS by drawing architectural parallels to establish a unified engineering approach. We then defined a minimal set of agent concepts to perform two practical studies on leveraging MAS development. First, we incorporated these concepts into a DS architectural pattern to design a distributed MAS. We then used these concepts in a graduate course to teach MAS engineering to students with no prior knowledge of agent theory. The learning outcomes from both courses included successful MAS implementation using DS tools and techniques. Although more than two-thirds of these students had no practical experience in developing distributed systems, the average final grade in both courses was above 80\%, thus validating our approach. Finally, we discuss how this study supports the development of advanced systems using modern AI techniques consistently with established agent-related research while leveraging established DS techniques and concepts.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that introducing a minimal set of agent-related concepts into the Distributed Systems domain improves engineering of modern MAS by aligning DS architectural patterns with agent theory. It supports this via recapitulation of common origins, definition of the minimal concepts, their application to design a distributed MAS, and their use in two graduate courses where students lacking prior DS or agent experience produced successful implementations with average grades above 80%.

Significance. If the causal link holds, the work could offer a practical bridge between established DS engineering and MAS development, aiding education and implementation of collaborative AI systems. The teaching-study validation is currently too weak to support strong claims of improvement, but the minimal-concept framing itself is a reasonable starting point for reuse of patterns if better isolated from confounds.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and course-study description] Abstract and course-study description: the claim that the outcomes 'validate our approach' is load-bearing for the central thesis, yet the reported evidence consists only of post-intervention grades (>80% average) and implementation success with no control condition, pre/post measures, sample sizes, or statistical analysis to rule out confounds such as course structure, instructor effects, or self-selection.
  2. [Practical studies section] Practical studies section: the first study (incorporating the minimal concepts into a DS architectural pattern) provides no concrete comparison showing that the unified approach yields measurable improvements in design or implementation effort relative to standard DS patterns alone.
minor comments (1)
  1. The manuscript would benefit from an explicit, enumerated definition of the 'minimal set of agent-related concepts' early in the text rather than leaving it implicit.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments highlighting limitations in our evidence and study design. We agree that stronger causal claims require more rigorous controls and that the first practical study is illustrative rather than comparative. We will revise the manuscript to moderate language, clarify scope, report sample details, and acknowledge limitations. Below we respond point by point.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and course-study description] Abstract and course-study description: the claim that the outcomes 'validate our approach' is load-bearing for the central thesis, yet the reported evidence consists only of post-intervention grades (>80% average) and implementation success with no control condition, pre/post measures, sample sizes, or statistical analysis to rule out confounds such as course structure, instructor effects, or self-selection.

    Authors: We acknowledge that 'validate' overstates the observational nature of the data. The course outcomes show that students without prior DS or agent experience could implement working MAS using the concepts and DS tools, with grades above 80%. However, this does not rule out confounds. We will revise the abstract, introduction, and practical studies section to replace 'validate' with 'illustrate the feasibility of' or 'provide initial support for', explicitly state the exploratory character of the study, report the number of students per course, and note the absence of controls or statistical tests as a limitation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Practical studies section] Practical studies section: the first study (incorporating the minimal concepts into a DS architectural pattern) provides no concrete comparison showing that the unified approach yields measurable improvements in design or implementation effort relative to standard DS patterns alone.

    Authors: The first study was intended as a worked example of embedding the minimal agent concepts into an existing DS pattern (e.g., to design a distributed MAS), not as a controlled comparison of effort or quality. We will revise the section to state this purpose explicitly, remove any implication of measured improvement, and add a limitations paragraph noting that quantitative comparison against baseline DS patterns alone was outside the scope of the current work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical teaching study with no derivation chain or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper presents a conceptual unification of MAS and DS via architectural parallels, followed by an empirical validation through two graduate courses measuring student implementation success and grades (>80% average). No equations, parameters, or predictions are defined; the central claim rests on observed outcomes rather than any reduction of a result to its own inputs by construction. No self-citation load-bearing steps, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes appear. The absence of a control group is a methodological limitation but does not constitute circularity under the defined patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the paper introduces one invented entity (the minimal set of agent concepts) whose independent evidence is not described. No free parameters or explicit axioms are mentioned.

invented entities (1)
  • minimal set of agent-related concepts no independent evidence
    purpose: to serve as a lightweight bridge between DS architectural patterns and MAS engineering
    The abstract states that the authors defined this set and incorporated it into DS patterns, but provides no external validation or falsifiable prediction for the set itself.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5786 in / 1259 out tokens · 21365 ms · 2026-06-28T19:28:25.152937+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Russell and Peter Norvig

    Stuart J. Russell and Peter Norvig. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1995

    1995

  2. [2]

    Distributed artificial intelligence, volume 2

    Robin Gasser and Michael N Huhns. Distributed artificial intelligence, volume 2. Morgan Kaufmann, 2014

    2014

  3. [3]

    A commitment-based framework for describing informal cooperative work

    Richard E Fikes. A commitment-based framework for describing informal cooperative work. Cognitive Science, 6(4):331–347, 1982

    1982

  4. [4]

    Decentralized artificial intelligence

    Y Müller. Decentralized artificial intelligence. Decentralised AI, pages 3–13, 1990

    1990

  5. [5]

    Multi-agent systems: an introduction to distributed artifi- cial intelligence, volume 1

    Jacques Ferber. Multi-agent systems: an introduction to distributed artifi- cial intelligence, volume 1. Addison-Wesley Reading, 1999

    1999

  6. [6]

    Applications of distributed artificial intelligence in industry

    H Van Dyke Parunak. Applications of distributed artificial intelligence in industry. Foundations of distributed artificial intelligence, 2, 1996

    1996

  7. [7]

    Distributed Systems

    Maarten Van Steen and Andrew S Tanenbaum. Distributed Systems. distributed-systems.net, 3 edition, 2017

    2017

  8. [8]

    World wide web

    Tim Berners-Lee, Dimitri Dimitroyannis, A John Mallinckrodt, and Susan McKay. World wide web. Computers in Physics, 8(3):298–299, 1994

    1994

  9. [9]

    The semantic web

    Tim Berners-Lee, James Hendler, and Ora Lassila. The semantic web. Scientific american, 284(5):34–43, 2001

    2001

  10. [10]

    O’Reilly Media, Inc

    Jim Webber, Savas Parastatidis, and Ian Robinson. REST in practice: Hypermedia and systems architecture. " O’Reilly Media, Inc.", 2010

    2010

  11. [11]

    Fantastic mass and where to find them: First results and lesson learned

    Viviana Mascardi. Fantastic mass and where to find them: First results and lesson learned

  12. [12]

    Clifford Neuman

    B. Clifford Neuman. Scale in distributed systems. ISI/USC, 1994

    1994

  13. [13]

    A discussion of two major benefits of using agents in software development

    Federico Bergenti. A discussion of two major benefits of using agents in software development. In International Workshop on Engineering Societies in the Agents World, pages 1–12. Springer, 2002

    2002

  14. [14]

    Parallelising multi-agent systems for high performance computing

    Paulo Leitão, Udo Inden, and Claus-Peter Rückemann. Parallelising multi-agent systems for high performance computing. In Third In- ternational Conference on Advanced Communications and Computation (INFOCOMP’13), volume 6, page 1. IARIA, 2013

    2013

  15. [15]

    A survey on parallel and distributed multi-agent systems for high performance computing simulations

    Alban Rousset, Bénédicte Herrmann, Christophe Lang, and Laurent Philippe. A survey on parallel and distributed multi-agent systems for high performance computing simulations. Computer Science Review, 22:27– 46, 2016

    2016

  16. [16]

    A distributed multi-agent system for collaborative information management and learn- ing

    James R Chen, Shawn R Wolfe, and Stephen D Wragg. A distributed multi-agent system for collaborative information management and learn- ing. Technical report, 2000

    2000

  17. [17]

    Jade implemented mobile multi- agent based, distributed information platform for pervasive health care monitoring

    Chuan-Jun Su and Chia-Ying Wu. Jade implemented mobile multi- agent based, distributed information platform for pervasive health care monitoring. Applied Soft Computing, 11(1):315–325, 2011

    2011

  18. [18]

    Software architecture in practice

    Len Bass, Paul Clements, and Rick Kazman. Software architecture in practice. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2003

    2003

  19. [19]

    Bran V . Selic. On the Semantic Foundations of Standard UML 2.0, pages 181–199. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004

    2004

  20. [20]

    B. Selic. Uml 2: A model-driven development tool. IBM Systems Journal, 45(3):607–620, 2006

    2006

  21. [21]

    Service-oriented architecture

    Randall Perrey and Mark Lycett. Service-oriented architecture. In 2003 Symposium on Applications and the Internet Workshops, 2003. Proceed- ings., pages 116–119. IEEE, 2003

    2003

  22. [22]

    Understanding SOA with Web services

    Eric Newcomer and Greg Lomow. Understanding SOA with Web services. Addison-Wesley, 2005

    2005

  23. [23]

    An introduction to software architecture

    David Garlan and Mary Shaw. An introduction to software architecture. In Advances in software engineering and knowledge engineering, pages 1–39. World Scientific, 1993

    1993

  24. [24]

    Exploiting virtual synchrony in dis- tributed systems

    Ken Birman and Thomas Joseph. Exploiting virtual synchrony in dis- tributed systems. In Proceedings of the eleventh ACM Symposium on Operating systems principles, pages 123–138, 1987

    1987

  25. [25]

    Monitoring streams—a new class of data management applica- tions

    Don Carney, U ˘gur Çetintemel, Mitch Cherniack, Christian Convey, Sang- don Lee, Greg Seidman, Nesime Tatbul, Stan Zdonik, and Michael Stone- braker. Monitoring streams—a new class of data management applica- tions. In VLDB’02: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Databases, pages 215–226. Elsevier, 2002

    2002

  26. [26]

    The many faces of publish/subscribe

    Patrick Th Eugster, Pascal A Felber, Rachid Guerraoui, and Anne-Marie Kermarrec. The many faces of publish/subscribe. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 35(2):114–131, 2003

    2003

  27. [27]

    Middleware architecture with patterns and frameworks

    Sacha Krakowiak. Middleware architecture with patterns and frameworks. 2007

    2007

  28. [28]

    Architecture-based design of multi-agent systems

    Danny Weyns. Architecture-based design of multi-agent systems. Springer Science & Business Media, 2010

    2010

  29. [29]

    De- veloping multi-agent systems with JADE, volume 7

    Fabio Luigi Bellifemine, Giovanni Caire, and Dominic Greenwood. De- veloping multi-agent systems with JADE, volume 7. John Wiley & Sons, 2007

    2007

  30. [30]

    An overview of the multiagent systems engineering methodology

    Mark F Wood and Scott A DeLoach. An overview of the multiagent systems engineering methodology. In International Workshop on Agent- Oriented Software Engineering, pages 207–221. Springer, 2000

    2000

  31. [31]

    Multi-agent oriented programming with jacamo

    Olivier Boissier, Rafael H Bordini, Jomi F Hübner, Alessandro Ricci, and Andrea Santi. Multi-agent oriented programming with jacamo. Science of Computer Programming, 78(6):747–761, 2013

    2013

  32. [32]

    Agent theories, archi- tectures, and languages: a survey

    Michael Wooldridge and Nicholas R Jennings. Agent theories, archi- tectures, and languages: a survey. In International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, pages 1–39. Springer, 1994

    1994

  33. [33]

    Bdi agents: from theory to practice

    Anand S Rao, Michael P Georgeff, et al. Bdi agents: from theory to practice. In ICMAS, volume 95, pages 312–319, 1995

    1995

  34. [34]

    Standardizing agent communication

    Yannis Labrou. Standardizing agent communication. In ECCAI Advanced Course on Artificial Intelligence, pages 74–97. Springer, 2001

    2001

  35. [35]

    Shujun Li and Mieczyslaw M. Kokar. Agent Communication Language. Springer New York, New York, NY , 2013

    2013

  36. [36]

    A state of art review on various aspects of multi-agent system

    Renuka Kamdar, Priyanka Paliwal, and Yogendra Kumar. A state of art review on various aspects of multi-agent system. Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers, page 1830006, 2018

    2018

  37. [37]

    Fipa—towards a standard for software agents

    Paul D O’Brien and Richard C Nicol. Fipa—towards a standard for software agents. BT Technology Journal, 16(3):51–59, 1998

    1998

  38. [38]

    Kqml as an agent communication language

    Tim Finin, Richard Fritzson, Don McKay, and Robin McEntire. Kqml as an agent communication language. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM ’94, pages 456–463, 1994

    1994

  39. [39]

    Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language, volume 626

    John R Searle and John Rogers Searle. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language, volume 626. Cambridge university press, 1969

    1969

  40. [40]

    Design of high availability manufacturing resource agents using jade framework and cloud replication

    Silviu R ˘aileanu, Florin Daniel Anton, Theodor Borangiu, and Silvia An- ton. Design of high availability manufacturing resource agents using jade framework and cloud replication. In Service Orientation in Holonic and Multi-Agent Manufacturing, pages 201–215. Springer, 2018

    2018

  41. [41]

    A framework for designing supply chain disruptions management consid- ering productive systems and carrier viewpoints

    Maurício Fontoura Blos, Robson Marinho da Silva, and Hui-Ming Wee. A framework for designing supply chain disruptions management consid- ering productive systems and carrier viewpoints. International Journal of Production Research, pages 1–17, 2018

    2018

  42. [42]

    A roadmap of agent research and development

    Nicholas R Jennings, Katia Sycara, and Michael Wooldridge. A roadmap of agent research and development. Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, 1(1):7–38, 1998

    1998

  43. [43]

    Letizia: An agent that assists web browsing

    Henry Lieberman et al. Letizia: An agent that assists web browsing. IJCAI (1), 1995:924–929, 1995

    1995

  44. [44]

    Moving up the information food chain: Deploying softbots on the world wide web

    Oren Etzioni. Moving up the information food chain: Deploying softbots on the world wide web. In Proceedings of the national conference on artificial intelligence, pages 1322–1326, 1996. VOLUME 4, 2016 15 Casals, Brandão: MAS:DS

    1996

  45. [45]

    An agent architecture for personalized web stores

    Liliana Ardissono, Cristina Barbero, Anna Goy, and Giovanna Petrone. An agent architecture for personalized web stores. In Proceedings of the third annual conference on Autonomous Agents, pages 182–189. ACM, 1999

    1999

  46. [46]

    Engineering web service-agent integration

    Dominic Greenwood and Monique Calisti. Engineering web service-agent integration. In Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2004 IEEE International Conference on, volume 2, pages 1918–1925. IEEE, 2004

    2004

  47. [47]

    Agents are not (just) web services: considering bdi agents and web services

    Ian Dickinson and Michael Wooldridge. Agents are not (just) web services: considering bdi agents and web services. In Proceedings of the 2005 Workshop on Service-Oriented Computing and Agent-Based Engineering (SOCABE’2005), Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2005

    2005

  48. [48]

    A platform for developing soa/ws applications as open and heterogeneous multi-agent systems

    Alessandro Ricci, Enrico Denti, and Michele Piunti. A platform for developing soa/ws applications as open and heterogeneous multi-agent systems. Multiagent and Grid Systems, 6(2):105–132, 2010

    2010

  49. [49]

    Agents and the semantic web

    James Hendler. Agents and the semantic web. IEEE Intelligent systems, 16(2):30–37, 2001

    2001

  50. [50]

    Agents as web services

    Michael N Huhns. Agents as web services. IEEE Internet computing, 6(4):93–95, 2002

    2002

  51. [51]

    A multi-agent based framework for collaborative testing on web services

    Xiaoying Bai, Guilan Dai, Dezheng Xu, and Wei-Tek Tsai. A multi-agent based framework for collaborative testing on web services. In Software Technologies for Future Embedded and Ubiquitous Systems, 2006 and the 2006 Second International Workshop on Collaborative Computing, Integration, and Assurance. SEUS 2006/WCCIA 2006. The Fourth IEEE Workshop on, page...

    2006

  52. [52]

    Education beyond the cloud: anytime- anywhere learning in a smart campus environment

    Benjamin Hirsch and Jason WP Ng. Education beyond the cloud: anytime- anywhere learning in a smart campus environment. In Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST), 2011 International Conference for, pages 718–723. IEEE, 2011

    2011

  53. [53]

    An agent framework for ubiquitous services

    Conor Muldoon. An agent framework for ubiquitous services. University College Dublin, 2007

    2007

  54. [54]

    Mams service framework

    Alexander Thiele, Silvan Kaiser, Thomas Konnerth, and Benjamin Hirsch. Mams service framework. In International Workshop on Service- Oriented Computing: Agents, Semantics, and Engineering, pages 126–

  55. [55]

    Fu- sion@, a soa-based multi-agent architecture

    Dante I Tapia, Sara Rodríguez, Javier Bajo, and Juan M Corchado. Fu- sion@, a soa-based multi-agent architecture. In International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence 2008 (DCAI 2008), pages 99–107. Springer, 2009

    2008

  56. [56]

    Exposing agents as web services in jade

    Arthur Casals, Amal El Fallah Seghrouchni, Orso Negroni, and Anthony Othmani. Exposing agents as web services in jade. In International Work- shop on Engineering Multi-Agent Systems, pages 340–350. Springer, 2018

    2018

  57. [57]

    Agents: Agenthood, agent ar- chitectures, and agent taxonomies

    Andreas Tolk and Adelinde M Uhrmacher. Agents: Agenthood, agent ar- chitectures, and agent taxonomies. Agent-directed simulation and systems engineering, pages 75–109, 2009

    2009

  58. [58]

    A scouting-based multi-agent system model to deal with service collaboration in cloud computing

    Mauricio Paletta. A scouting-based multi-agent system model to deal with service collaboration in cloud computing. Systems and Software Devel- opment, Modeling, and Analysis: New Perspectives and Methodologies: New Perspectives and Methodologies, page 282, 2014

    2014

  59. [59]

    Multiagent foundations for distributed systems: A vision

    Amit K Chopra, Samuel H Christie V , and Munindar P Singh. Multiagent foundations for distributed systems: A vision. In International Workshop on Engineering Multi-Agent Systems, pages 62–71. Springer, 2021

    2021

  60. [60]

    Autonomous agents research group

    Stefano Albrecht, Filippos Christianos, Lukas Schäfer, Trevor McInroe, Mhairi Dunion, Adam Jelley, Amos Storkey, Aditya Kapoor, Sushant Swamy, Mayank Baranwal Kale-ab Tessera, et al. Autonomous agents research group. 2020

    2020

  61. [61]

    Interaction-oriented software engineering: Programming abstractions for autonomy and decentralization

    Amit K Chopra. Interaction-oriented software engineering: Programming abstractions for autonomy and decentralization. AI Communications, 35(4):381–391, 2022

    2022

  62. [62]

    Mobile objects and mobile agents: The future of distributed computing? In European conference on object-oriented pro- gramming, pages 1–12

    Danny B Lange. Mobile objects and mobile agents: The future of distributed computing? In European conference on object-oriented pro- gramming, pages 1–12. Springer, 1998

    1998

  63. [63]

    Multi-agent systems: overview of a new paradigm for distributed systems

    Hafiz Farooq Ahmad. Multi-agent systems: overview of a new paradigm for distributed systems. In 7th IEEE International Symposium on High As- surance Systems Engineering, 2002. Proceedings., pages 101–107. IEEE, 2002

    2002

  64. [64]

    Engineering multi-agent systems: State of affairs and the road ahead

    Viviana Mascardi, Danny Weyns, and Alessandro Ricci. Engineering multi-agent systems: State of affairs and the road ahead. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, 44(1):18–28, March 2019

    2019

  65. [65]

    The gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design

    Michael Wooldridge, Nicholas R Jennings, and David Kinny. The gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design. Autonomous Agents and multi-agent systems, 3(3):285–312, 2000

    2000

  66. [66]

    Tropos: An agent-oriented software development methodology

    Paolo Bresciani, Anna Perini, Paolo Giorgini, Fausto Giunchiglia, and John Mylopoulos. Tropos: An agent-oriented software development methodology. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 8(3):203– 236, 2004

    2004

  67. [67]

    Prometheus: A methodology for developing intelligent agents

    Lin Padgham and Michael Winikoff. Prometheus: A methodology for developing intelligent agents. In International Workshop on Agent- Oriented Software Engineering, pages 174–185. Springer, 2002

    2002

  68. [68]

    A model-driven, agent- based approach for the integration of services into a collaborative business process

    Ingo Zinnikus, Christian Hahn, and Klaus Fischer. A model-driven, agent- based approach for the integration of services into a collaborative business process. In Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems-V olume 1, pages 241–248. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2008

    2008

  69. [69]

    Model driven development of semantic web enabled multi-agent systems

    Geylani Kardas, Arda Goknil, Oguz Dikenelli, and N Yasemin Topaloglu. Model driven development of semantic web enabled multi-agent systems. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 18(02):261– 308, 2009

    2009

  70. [70]

    Enhancing the interop- erability between multiagent systems and service-oriented architectures through a model-driven approach

    Christian Hahn, Sven Jacobi, and David Raber. Enhancing the interop- erability between multiagent systems and service-oriented architectures through a model-driven approach. In Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Con- ference on, volume 2, pages 415–422. IEEE, 2010

    2010

  71. [71]

    Service- oriented agent methodologies

    Giacomo Cabri, Letizia Leonardi, and Mariachiara Puviani. Service- oriented agent methodologies. In Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, 2007. WETICE 2007. 16th IEEE Interna- tional Workshops on, pages 24–29. IEEE, 2007

    2007

  72. [72]

    Give agents some rest: A resource-oriented abstraction layer for internet-scale agent environments

    Andrei Ciortea, Olivier Boissier, Antoine Zimmermann, and Adina Magda Florea. Give agents some rest: A resource-oriented abstraction layer for internet-scale agent environments. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, AAMAS ’17, pages 1502–1504, 2017

    2017

  73. [73]

    Engineering scalable distributed environments and organizations for mas

    Alessandro Ricci, Andrei Ciortea, Simon Mayer, Olivier Boissier, Rafael H Bordini, and Jomi Fred Hubner. Engineering scalable distributed environments and organizations for mas. In Proceedings of the 18th In- ternational Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pages 790–798. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Sys...

    2019

  74. [74]

    Agentcities: a worldwide open agent network

    Steven Willmott, Jonathan Dale, Bernard Burg, Patricia Charlton, and Paul O’Brien. Agentcities: a worldwide open agent network. Agentlink News, 8(LIA-ARTICLE-2001-002), 2001

    2001

  75. [75]

    A distributed architecture for the monitoring and analysis of time series data

    Ruairi Donagh O’Reilly. A distributed architecture for the monitoring and analysis of time series data. Technical report, 2015

    2015

  76. [76]

    Beyond physical mashups: Autonomous systems for the web of things

    Andrei Ciortea, Olivier Boissier, and Alessandro Ricci. Beyond physical mashups: Autonomous systems for the web of things. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on the Web of Things, pages 16–20. ACM, 2017

    2017

  77. [77]

    Resource-dependent contextual planning in ami

    Arthur Casals, Amal El Fallah-Seghrouchni, Anarosa Alves Franco Brandão, Carlos Eduardo Pantoja, and José Viterbo. Resource-dependent contextual planning in ami. Procedia Computer Science, 151:485–492, 2019

    2019

  78. [78]

    Devel- oping multiagent systems: The gaia methodology

    Franco Zambonelli, Nicholas R Jennings, and Michael Wooldridge. Devel- oping multiagent systems: The gaia methodology. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), 12(3):317–370, 2003

    2003

  79. [79]

    The mase methodology

    Scott A DeLoach. The mase methodology. In Methodologies and software engineering for agent systems, pages 107–125. Springer, 2004

    2004

  80. [80]

    The o-mase methodology

    Scott A DeLoach and Juan C Garcia-Ojeda. The o-mase methodology. In Handbook on Agent-Oriented Design Processes, pages 253–285. Springer, 2014

    2014

Showing first 80 references.