REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 63 references
Spin structure of diatomic van der Waals molecules of alkali atoms
T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read The spin structure of weakly bound alkali dimers is set by a single dimensionless exchange-to-hyperfine ratio, and this paper shows that the ratio classifies all seven bosonic alkali species.
desk verdict A practically useful reduced-potential toolkit with a genuinely new but only qualitatively validated classification parameter; the quantitative universality claim needs a direct independent check. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing machinery is the reduced potential $V_S^*(r)=V_S(r)+C_6\lambda_S^6/r^{12}$, which adds a tunable $1/r^{12}$ repulsion to the real Born-Oppenheimer singlet and triplet potentials so that only 5--7 $s$-wave bound states survive, with $\lambda_S$ fixed by matching $a_s$ and $a_t$ and then fine-tuned (at most about 2%) against $a(B)$ and $r_e(B)$. The classification uses the universal vdW energy bins---fixed intervals of the near-threshold spectrum labeled by the vdW length and energy---together with the quantum-defect function $u(a)=\tan^{-1}[\bar a/(a-\bar a)]/\pi$, which gives the position of an $s$-wave level inside its bin. From these, $u_{st}=\min(|u(a_s)-u(a_t)|,1-|u(a_s)-u(a_t)|)$ measures the effective exchange splitting, $\tilde E_{\rm hf}=\min(E_{\rm hf},E_{\rm bin}/2)$ caps the effective hyperfine energy, and their ratio $\xi_{\rm ex}=\tilde E_{\rm ex}/\tilde E_{\rm hf}$ is the classification parameter. The numerical benchmark is $\gamma_{\rm ex}$, computed from Eq.~(9) as a ratio of averaged spin purities in the two bases.
What would settle it
Calculate the zero-field spin-mixing parameter $\gamma_{\rm ex}$ for $^{133}$Cs$_2$ using the full Born-Oppenheimer potentials including the magnetic dipole-dipole interaction, and compare it with the reduced-potential value in Table III; a difference substantially larger than the few-percent agreement found for the other species would show that the $\xi_{\rm ex}$ classification fails in the intermediate regime it is meant to capture.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
At zero magnetic field, the spin composition of a weakly bound alkali vdW molecule is set by which interaction wins: electronic spin exchange favors molecular states of definite total electronic and nuclear spin ($[SI]$ basis), while hyperfine coupling favors states of definite atomic hyperfine spins ($(f_a f_b)$ basis). The paper quantifies this with a spin-mixing parameter $\gamma_{\rm ex}$ obtained from the average spin purity of 80--200 molecular levels in the two bases, finding $\gamma_{\rm ex}\gg 1$ for $^7$Li$_2$, $^{23}$Na$_2$, $^{39}$K$_2$, and $^{41}$K$_2$; $\gamma_{\rm ex}\ll 1$ for $^{85}$Rb$_2$ and $^{87}$Rb$_2$; and $\gamma_{\rm ex}\sim 1$ for $^{133}$Cs$_2$. Its central claim is that this ordering is qualitatively captured by the exchange parameter $\xi_{\rm ex}=u_{st}E_{\rm bin}/\min(E_{\rm hf},E_{\rm bin}/2)$, where $u_{st}$ measures the separation of singlet and triplet levels within the universal vdW energy bins and $E_{\rm hf}$ is the atomic hyperfine splitting; no short-range potential details beyond the scattering lengths and hyperfine constant are needed. The same reduced potentials that underlie this analysis reproduce, for most species over $\pm 200$ G, the scattering length, effective range, molecular binding energies, and the spin structure of scattering and bound states, making them a practical surrogate for full Born-Oppenheimer calculations.
Load-bearing premise
The load-bearing premise is that the zero-field spin structure of these weakly bound long-range molecules depends only on the singlet and triplet scattering lengths, the atomic hyperfine energy, and the universal vdW energy-bin size, so that species-specific short-range effects such as the dipole-dipole interactions in cesium do not change the spin purity; if such details matter, the classification fails in the intermediate regime it is meant to describe.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- For any alkali species, the spin purity of weakly bound vdW molecules can be predicted from just the singlet and triplet scattering lengths and the hyperfine constant, without solving the full coupled-channel problem.
- Three-body recombination simulations can use the shallow reduced potentials instead of deep Born-Oppenheimer potentials, cutting the numerical burden while preserving Feshbach resonances, binding energies, and spin propensity rules.
- The $\xi_{\rm ex}$ ordering gives a rule of thumb for which spin basis to use when interpreting spectra or reactions: the atomic $(f_a f_b)$ basis for rubidium, the molecular $[SI]$ basis for lithium, sodium, and potassium, and a mixed description for cesium.
- Because $\xi_{\rm ex}$ grows with energy-bin index for the lighter species, deeper vdW levels of lithium, sodium, and potassium are predicted to become increasingly $[SI]$-dominated, whereas rubidium and cesium levels stay in the same spin regime across bins.
- The reduced potentials support bound states up to $l=20$ and reproduce $s$- and $d$-wave avoided crossings, so near-threshold multichannel physics in these dimers is largely insensitive to short-range potential details.
Reading between the lines
- Extending the same ratio construction to heteronuclear alkali dimers, replacing the two scattering lengths and the two hyperfine constants with the combined species values, is a natural testable step that the authors do not take; a generalized $\xi_{\rm ex}$ would predict where heteronuclear molecules fall between the homonuclear classes.
- At finite magnetic field the Zeeman energy enters as a third competing scale, so one may expect a field-dependent generalization $\xi_{\rm ex}(B)$ to predict where spin purity changes and where Feshbach resonances alter the molecular character; the paper only notes this extension as future work.
- The empirical success of matching only $a(B)$ and $r_e(B)$ to build potentials suggests a constructive recipe for other long-range-interacting systems, such as polar or Rydberg dimers, where the short-range potential is hard to compute but low-energy scattering parameters are known.
- Because $\xi_{\rm ex}$ uses only experimentally measurable quantities, the classification could be checked without molecular spectroscopy: measure the scattering lengths by Feshbach spectroscopy, use the known hyperfine constants, and compare the predicted ordering with state-resolved product distributions from three-body recombination.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This paper studies weakly bound van der Waals dimers of two identical bosonic alkali atoms (7Li through 133Cs). For each species it constructs reduced singlet and triplet potentials V*_S = V_S + C6 λ_S^6/r^12, with parameters tuned to reproduce the singlet and triplet scattering lengths and, after fine-tuning λ* and a hyperfine rescaling factor c_hf, the field-dependent scattering length a(B) and effective range r_e(B) over ±200 G (restricted to ±20 G for 133Cs). The reduced potentials are shown to reproduce near-threshold s- and d-wave bound levels, Feshbach-resonance features, and the spin structure of scattering and bound states, with the authors disclosing known failures (deep levels, high partial waves, and the 133Cs d-wave resonances at 31 and 33 G). At zero field the paper defines a spin-mixing parameter γ_ex from the average spin purity of all reduced-potential bound states, and introduces the dimensionless classification parameter ξ_ex = u_st E_bin / min(E_hf, E_bin/2), built from the singlet/triplet scattering lengths, the hyperfine constant, and the vdW energy-bin size. It shows that the ordering of ξ_ex across species and bins is consistent with γ_ex: exchange-dominated species (7Li, 23Na, 39K, 41K), hyperfine-dominated (85Rb, 87Rb), and intermediate (133Cs).
Significance. The reduced-potential construction is a genuinely useful, carefully benchmarked tool: the numerical comparisons are extensive, all tuning parameters are tabulated with sufficient precision for reproduction, and the authors are explicit about where the model fails (deep levels, large l, and the 133Cs d-wave regime). The paper also provides an independent validation of the effective exchange splitting: Fig. 9 compares Ẽ_ex with actual BO-potential singlet–triplet separations over six energy bins. If the ξ_ex classification holds, it is a novel and cheap predictor of molecular spin character from a_s, a_t, and A_hf alone, with direct relevance to the spin-propensity rules observed in ultracold three-body recombination, and it would identify the exchange-versus-hyperfine competition as the mechanism behind species-dependent spin structure. It is to the paper's credit that ξ_ex itself is not fitted to γ_ex, and that Eq. (13) is honestly described as a rough characterization; nonetheless, as detailed below, the classification claim currently rests on an internal consistency check rather than on an independent validation against the full Born-Oppenheimer physics.
major comments (3)
- [Sec. IV.B–IV.C, Eqs. (13)–(14)] The classification claim rests on the effective hyperfine energy Ẽ_hf = min(E_hf, E_bin/2) in Eq. (13), which the text introduces as a rough upper bound without derivation. This cap is load-bearing rather than cosmetic: for 133Cs, using E_hf instead of Ẽ_hf would change ξ_ex^(1) from 0.277 to about 0.0016, converting the paper's borderline 'mixed' example into a strongly hyperfine-dominated prediction, while for 23Na, 39K, 85Rb, and 87Rb the cap changes ξ by factors of roughly 1.05 to 57. Unlike Ẽ_ex, which is validated against actual BO singlet–triplet splittings in Fig. 9, no validation of Eq. (13) against actual hyperfine-induced level shifts is presented, even though the same machinery would produce it (for instance, by comparing BO molecular levels computed with A_hf = 0 and with the physical A_hf, bin by bin). I ask for this check to be added before the classification claim is accepted.
- [Sec. IV, Eqs. (9)–(10), Table III] The γ_ex values in Table III are computed from reduced-potential molecular states only (N ≈ 80–200 states, all partial waves up to l ≈ 20, binding energies up to several thousand E_vdW), and the authors note in a parenthetical that an analogous BO-based computation 'could be performed' but do not show it. The deep and high-l states that enter this average are precisely the regime where the reduced model's fidelity is weakest, as acknowledged in Secs. III.B–III.C (perceptible energy deviations for deeper levels; about 7 G shift of the d-wave avoided crossing in Fig. 7). At the same time, ξ_ex is evaluated from a_s, a_t, and A_hf — the same low-energy inputs used to fix λ_s, λ_t, and c_hf of the reduced potentials in Table II. The agreement in Fig. 10 is therefore an internal consistency check between two quantities that both derive from the same reduced model, rather than an independent test of the claim that weakly bound spin structure is a universal function of a_s, a_t, A_hf, and the bin size. I stress that the check is not strictly circular, since ξ_ex is not fitted to γ_ex and γ_ex is computed from multichannel wavefunctions; nevertheless, the missing external anchor is real. I request either (i) γ_ex computed from the BO potentials within the same binding-energy window, or (ii) a robustness test showing that a second reduced-potential realization with the same a_s, a_t, and A_hf but different n_s/n_t yields essentially the same γ_ex.
- [Sec. III.A, Table II, and Sec. IV.C] For 85Rb, 87Rb, and 133Cs the reduced model rescales the hyperfine constant by c_hf = 0.9477, 0.9026, and 0.8710 to fit a(B) and r_e(B), yet ξ_ex in Table III is evaluated with the physical A_hf from Ref. [44]. The γ_ex values used to validate ξ_ex are therefore generated with a systematically different hyperfine interaction for the very species that define the hyperfine-dominated and intermediate regimes, and the 13% rescaling for 133Cs is not negligible compared with the margin by which Cs is classified as mixed (γ_ex = 0.641). The authors should either recompute γ_ex with the physical A_hf or demonstrate that the c_hf rescaling changes γ_ex by an amount too small to affect the qualitative ordering.
minor comments (5)
- [Abstract and Table III] The abstract's claim that ξ_ex 'can be used to classify the spin structure of vdW molecules for each atomic species' is stronger than what is shown: ξ_ex^(i) is bin-dependent, and for 23Na and 41K the first-bin values (0.619 and 0.394) lie in the intermediate range while their averaged γ_ex values (47.1 and 29.5) are firmly in the exchange-dominated class; I suggest stating explicitly that the classification is per energy bin (or per bin range), as the text itself explains.
- [Fig. 9] The statement that Ẽ_ex is a 'fairly good approximation' to ΔE_st is not quantified; reporting the mean and maximum relative deviation per bin (or a correlation measure) would make the validation robust, since the figure spans four orders of magnitude in both axes.
- [Sec. II.A, Eq. (5)] The threshold σ_ex(r_ex) = 10 that defines the vdW-molecule regime is arbitrary; a brief statement of how r_ex and E_max^S shift for a different threshold (for example, 5 or 20) would indicate how robust the chosen binding-energy window is.
- [Sec. IV.C] In the sentence describing 133Cs, 'ξex ∼ 1 and γex ∼ 1' is looser than the tabulated values (0.277 and 0.641); since the classification is intended to be qualitative, a phrase such as 'of order unity or below' would avoid inviting a quantitative reading.
- [Sec. IV.C, conclusion] The brief remark that relating ξ_ex to Hund's cases 'merits further investigation' could be made more useful by adding one or two sentences on where the ξ_ex ≫ 1 and ξ_ex ≪ 1 limits plausibly sit in the standard Hund's-case classification of alkali dimers.
Circularity Check
No strict circularity: the exchange parameter xi_ex is not fitted to gamma_ex, and the reduced potentials are separately benchmarked against the BO potentials, though the xi_ex-gamma_ex comparison is largely an internal consistency check.
full rationale
The paper's central claims are that the reduced potentials V*_S reproduce the low-energy bound, scattering, and spin properties of the full Born-Oppenheimer potentials, and that the dimensionless parameter xi_ex classifies the molecular spin structure characterized by gamma_ex. Neither claim reduces to its inputs by construction. The reduced potentials are fitted to the singlet and triplet scattering lengths (Section IIB) and later fine-tuned to a(B) and r_e(B) (Section IIIA), but gamma_ex is not a fit parameter; it is a coupled-channel output computed from those potentials via Eqs. (9)-(10) and Table III. xi_ex is defined independently from a_s, a_t, A_hf, and the vdW energy-bin size (Eqs. (11)-(14)), and the paper contains no equation of the form gamma_ex = F(xi_ex), nor is xi_ex optimized against gamma_ex. The agreement in Fig. 10 is therefore a numerical correlation rather than a tautology. Moreover, the reduced potentials' spin structure is separately validated against the BO potentials for scattering states and avoided crossings (Figs. 6-7), which gives the gamma_ex computation independent grounding. Two caveats should be flagged explicitly, though they are limitations rather than circular steps. First, Section IVB introduces the effective hyperfine estimate ~E_hf = min(E_hf, E_bin/2) in Eq. (13) as an acknowledged 'rough characterization' ('we will utilize this upper bound'), and this cap is essential for placing 133Cs in the intermediate regime; the bound is heuristic and its validity is not independently demonstrated. Second, because gamma_ex is computed from potentials fitted to the same low-energy parameters that enter xi_ex, the xi_ex-gamma_ex comparison is partly an internal consistency check; a fully independent test would require computing spin-mixing averages directly from the BO potentials, which the paper notes is possible ('A similar procedure could be performed on the molecular states of the BO potentials by restricting the range of energies of such states'). The self-citations (Refs. [32] and [54]) are applications of the present result rather than load-bearing evidence for it. Overall, no step exhibits a prediction that is equivalent to its inputs by definition, so the circularity score is low, reflecting the minor internal-validation loop and the ad hoc hyperfine cap.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (5)
- lambda_s (singlet repulsion length) =
Table II, e.g. 0.3792958 r_vdW for 7Li
- lambda_t (triplet repulsion length) =
Table II, e.g. 0.3181707 r_vdW for 7Li
- lambda*_s and lambda*_t (fine-tuned repulsion lengths) =
Table II, e.g. 0.3269770 for 39K singlet
- c_hf (hyperfine rescaling factor) =
0.9477 (85Rb), 0.9026 (87Rb), 0.8710 (133Cs)
- n_s and n_t (number of s-wave bound states in reduced potentials) =
n_s=6, n_t=6 or 5; Cs n_s=7
assumptions (6)
- domain assumption The BO potentials of Refs [33-37] accurately represent the true interaction for each alkali pair.
- domain assumption Fermi-contact hyperfine interaction with constant A_hf suffices; r-dependent short-range hyperfine, spin-rotation, and (except for Cs benchmarks) magnetic dipole-dipole interactions are negligible.
- ad hoc to paper V_s/t is approximately V_vdW minus or plus V_ex, and sigma_ex(r) = (V_s+V_t)/(V_s-V_t) with threshold 10 defines r_ex.
- standard math Near-threshold bound levels of vdW potentials follow the universal energy-bin structure and u(a) = atan[bar_a/(a - bar_a)]/pi.
- ad hoc to paper The effective hyperfine shift is capped by min(E_hf, E_bin/2), meaning a level cannot be pushed beyond half a bin.
- domain assumption Spin structure is insensitive to short-range potential details for weakly bound vdW states.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Spin structure of diatomic van der Waals molecules of alkali atoms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PXSQGW5E
@misc{pith2026241114787,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Spin structure of diatomic van der Waals molecules of alkali atoms},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PXSQGW5E}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14787}
}
read the original abstract
We theoretically investigate the spin structure of weakly bound diatomic van der Waals molecules formed by two identical bosonic alkali atoms. Our studies were performed using known Born-Oppenheimer potentials while developing a reduced interaction potential model. Such reduced potential models are currently a key for solving certain classes of few-body problems of atoms as they decrease the numerical burden on the computation. Although the reduced potentials are significantly shallower than actual Born-Oppenheimer potentials, they still capture the main properties of the near-threshold bound states, including their spin structure, and the scattering states over a broad range of magnetic fields. At zero magnetic field, we find that the variation in spin structure across different alkali species originates from the interplay between electronic spin exchange and hyperfine interactions. To characterize this competition we introduce a single parameter, which is a function of the singlet and triplet scattering lengths, the atomic hyperfine splitting constant, and the molecular binding energy. We show that this parameter can be used to classify the spin structure of vdW molecules for each atomic species.
Figures
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[44]
Chapurin, X
R. Chapurin, X. Xie, M. J. Van de Graaff, J. S. Popowski, J. P. D’Incao, P. S. Julienne, J. Ye, and E. A. Cornell, Precision test of the limits to universality in few-body physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 233402 (2019)
2019
-
[1]
B. Jeziorski, R. Moszynski, and K. Szalewicz, Perturbation Theory Approach to Intermolecular Potential Energy Surfaces of van der Waals Complexes, Chemical Reviews 94, 1887 (1994)
work page 1994
-
[2]
A. M. Reilly and A. Tkatchenko, Van der Waals dispersion interactions in molecular materials: beyond pairwise additivity, Chem. Sci. 6, 3289 (2015)
work page 2015
-
[3]
B. L. Blaney and G. E. Ewing, Van Der Waals Molecules, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 27, 553 (1976)
work page 1976
-
[4]
are rather comparable at r < 2 rvdW, both significantly larger than that of P acc [11]. This comparison has also been extended to other species, consistently showing similar agreement between results from the reduced potentials and those -400 -200 0 0 0.5 1 200 250 300 0 0.5 1 240 260 280 300 320 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) P(33) P(22) P(33) P(22) P(22) P(33) ...
-
[5]
We note that our reduced potentials can typically support bound states in a partial wave of up to l = 20. We have also checked the energies of states of l > 2 partial waves and found that the performance of the reduced potential is generally good for small l. We observe similar results for the other atomic species studied here. C. Spin structure The spin ...
-
[6]
D. J. Nesbitt, Toward state-to-state dynamics in ultracold collisions: Lessons from high-resolution spectroscopy of weakly bound molecular complexes, Chemical Reviews 112, 5062 (2012), pMID: 22937828
work page 2012
-
[7]
J. Hermann, R. A. J. DiStasio, and A. Tkatchenko, First-Principles Models for van der Waals Interactions in Molecules and Materials: Concepts, Theory, and Applications, Chemical Reviews 117, 4714 (2017), pMID: 28272886
work page 2017
Show all 63 references
-
[8]
E. R. Bernstein, Dynamics and Photochemistry of Neutral van der Waals Clusters, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 46, 197 (1995), pMID: 24329404
1995
-
[9]
K. M. Jones, E. Tiesinga, P. D. Lett, and P. S. Julienne, Ultracold photoassociation spectroscopy: Long-range molecules and atomic scattering, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 483 (2006)
2006
-
[10]
G. A. Rance, D. H. Marsh, S. J. Bourne, T. J. Reade, and A. N. Khlobystov, van der Waals Interactions between Nanotubes and Nanoparticles for Controlled Assembly of Composite Nanostructures, ACS Nano 4, 4920 (2010), pMID: 20684572
2010
-
[11]
V. V. Gobre and A. Tkatchenko, Scaling laws for van der Waals interactions in nanostructured materials, Nature Communications 4, 2341 (2013)
2013
-
[12]
J. M. Hutson, Intermolecular Forces from the Spectroscopy of Van Der Waals Molecules, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 41, 123 (1990)
1990
-
[13]
However, with the decrease of r, the P acc [SI ] starts to deviate from its asymptotic value and oscillates
= 0.1875 ∶ 0.0250 ∶ 0.7875 predicted by the basis transformation. However, with the decrease of r, the P acc [SI ] starts to deviate from its asymptotic value and oscillates. Except for an opposite oscillation phase, the values of P acc
-
[14]
Koperski, Study of diatomic van der Waals complexes in supersonic beams, Physics Reports 369, 177 (2002)
J. Koperski, Study of diatomic van der Waals complexes in supersonic beams, Physics Reports 369, 177 (2002)
2002
-
[15]
J. P. Toennies and A. F. Vilesov, Superfluid helium droplets: A uniquely cold nanomatrix for molecules and molecular complexes, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 43, 2622 (2004)
2004
-
[16]
C. A. S. Batista, R. G. Larson, and N. A. Kotov, Nonadditivity of nanoparticle interactions, Science 350, 1242477 (2015)
2015
-
[17]
B. A. Persson, B. Jönsson, and M. Lund, Enhanced Protein Steering: Cooperative Electrostatic and van der Waals Forces in Antigen-Antibody Complexes, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 113, 10459 (2009), pMID: 19583233
2009
-
[18]
Rossi, W
M. Rossi, W. Fang, and A. Michaelides, Stability of Complex Biomolecular Structures: van der Waals, Hydrogen Bond Cooperativity, and Nuclear Quantum Effects, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 6, 4233 (2015), pMID: 26722963
2015
-
[19]
Brahms, T
N. Brahms, T. V. Tscherbul, P. Zhang, J. Kłos, R. C. Forrey, Y. S. Au, H. R. Sadeghpour, A. Dalgarno, J. M. Doyle, and T. G. Walker, Formation and dynamics of van der Waals molecules in buffer-gas traps, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 19125 (2011)
2011
-
[20]
K. Szalewicz, Interplay between theory and experiment 14 in investigations of molecules embedded in superfluid helium nanodroplets†, International Reviews in Physical Chemistry 27, 273 (2008)
2008
-
[21]
Tariq, N
N. Tariq, N. A. Taisan, V. Singh, and J. D. Weinstein, Spectroscopic Detection of the LiHe Molecule, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 153201 (2013)
2013
-
[22]
Brahms, T
N. Brahms, T. V. Tscherbul, P. Zhang, J. Kłos, H. R. Sadeghpour, A. Dalgarno, J. M. Doyle, and T. G. Walker, Formation of van der Waals Molecules in Buffer-Gas- Cooled Magnetic Traps, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 033001 (2010)
2010
-
[23]
Köhler, K
T. Köhler, K. Góral, and P. S. Julienne, Production of cold molecules via magnetically tunable feshbach resonances, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 1311 (2006)
2006
-
[24]
Quiros, N
N. Quiros, N. Tariq, T. V. Tscherbul, J. Kłos, and J. D. Weinstein, Cold Anisotropically Interacting van der Waals Molecule: TiHe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 213401 (2017)
2017
-
[25]
Mirahmadi and J
M. Mirahmadi and J. Pérez-Ríos, On the formation of van der Waals complexes through three-body recombination, The Journal of Chemical Physics 154, 034305 (2021)
2021
-
[26]
Mirahmadi and J
M. Mirahmadi and J. Pérez-Ríos, Classical threshold law for the formation of van der Waals molecules, The Journal of Chemical Physics 155, 094306 (2021)
2021
-
[27]
J. Wolf, M. Deiß, A. Krükow, E. Tiemann, B. P. Ruzic, Y. Wang, J. P. D’Incao, P. S. Julienne, and J. Hecker Denschlag, State-to-state chemistry for three- body recombination in an ultracold rubidium gas, Science 358, 921 (2017)
2017
-
[28]
Ulmanis, J
J. Ulmanis, J. Deiglmayr, M. Repp, R. Wester, and M. Weidemüller, Ultracold molecules formed by photoassociation: Heteronuclear dimers, inelastic collisions, and interactions with ultrashort laser pulses , Chemical Reviews 112, 4890 (2012), pMID: 22931226
2012
-
[29]
Härter, A
A. Härter, A. Krükow, M. Deiß, B. Drews, E. Tiemann, and J. Hecker Denschlag, Population distribution of product states following three-body recombination in an ultracold atomic gas, Nature Physics 9, 512 (2013)
2013
-
[30]
J. P. D’Incao, Few-body physics in resonantly interact ing ultracold quantum gases, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 51, 043001 (2018)
2018
-
[31]
J.-L. Li, T. Secker, P. M. A. Mestrom, and S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, Strong spin-exchange recombination of three weakly interacting 7Li atoms, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023103 (2022)
2022
-
[32]
J. Wolf, M. Deiß, and J. Hecker Denschlag, Hyperfine Magnetic Substate Resolved State-to-State Chemistry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 253401 (2019)
2019
-
[33]
S. Haze, J. P. D’Incao, D. Dorer, M. Deiß, E. Tiemann, P. S. Julienne, and J. Hecker Denschlag, Spin-Conservation Propensity Rule for Three-Body Recombination of Ultracold Rb Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 133401 (2022)
2022
-
[34]
S. Haze, J. P. D’Incao, D. Dorer, J.-L. Li, M. Deiß, E. Tiemann, P. S. Julienne, and J. Hecker Denschlag, Energy scaling of the product state distribution for three- body recombination of ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013161 (2023)
2023
-
[35]
Tiemann, P
E. Tiemann, P. Gersema, K. K. Voges, T. Hartmann, A. Zenesini, and S. Ospelkaus, Beyond Born- Oppenheimer approximation in ultracold atomic collisions, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013366 (2020)
2020
-
[36]
J.-L. Li, P. S. Julienne, J. Hecker Denschlag, and J. P. D’Incao, Spin hierarchy in van der Waals molecule formation via ultracold three-body recombination, Phys. Rev. A 111, 013308 (2025)
2025
-
[37]
P. S. Julienne and J. M. Hutson, Contrasting the wide Feshbach resonances in 6Li and 7Li, Phys. Rev. A 89, 052715 (2014)
2014
-
[38]
In the simplified model, potentials can typically be made much shallower to alleviate the computational burden in three- body calculations [39–41]
it is also imperative to design simpler potential models to replace the actual BO potentials. In the simplified model, potentials can typically be made much shallower to alleviate the computational burden in three- body calculations [39–41]. We explore this aspect in this prese...
2025 arXiv
-
[39]
Knoop, T
S. Knoop, T. Schuster, R. Scelle, A. Trautmann, J. Appmeier, M. K. Oberthaler, E. Tiesinga, and E. Tiemann, Feshbach spectroscopy and analysis of the interaction potentials of ultracold sodium, Phys. Rev. A 83, 042704 (2011)
2011
-
[40]
Strauss, T
C. Strauss, T. Takekoshi, F. Lang, K. Winkler, R. Grimm, J. Hecker Denschlag, and E. Tiemann, Hyperfine, rotational, and vibrational structure of the a3Σ+ u state of 87Rb2, Phys. Rev. A 82, 052514 (2010)
2010
-
[41]
Berninger, A
M. Berninger, A. Zenesini, B. Huang, W. Harm, H.-C. Nägerl, F. Ferlaino, R. Grimm, P. S. Julienne, and J. M. Hutson, Feshbach resonances, weakly bound molecular states, and coupled-channel potentials for cesium at high magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. A 87, 032517 (2013)
2013
-
[42]
Three-body simulation is not only essential for three- body recombination but also necessary for the reaction of a vdW molecule and an atom because the vdW bond is very loose
-
[43]
Wang and P
Y. Wang and P. S. Julienne, Universal van der Waals physics for three cold atoms near Feshbach resonances, Nature Physics 10, 768 (2014)
2014
-
[45]
Tempest and S
K.-M. Tempest and S. Jonsell, Multichannel hyperspherical model for Efimov physics with van der Waals interactions controlled by a Feshbach resonance, Phys. Rev. A 107, 053319 (2023)
2023
-
[46]
Secker, J.-L
T. Secker, J.-L. Li, P. M. A. Mestrom, and S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, Multichannel nature of three-body recombination for ultracold 39K, Phys. Rev. A 103, 022825 (2021)
2021
-
[47]
van de Kraats, D
J. van de Kraats, D. J. M. Ahmed-Braun, J.-L. Li, and S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, Emergent Inflation of the Efimov Spectrum under Three-Body Spin-Exchange Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 133402 (2024)
2024
-
[48]
Arimondo, M
E. Arimondo, M. Inguscio, and P. Violino, Experimental determinations of the hyperfine structure in the alkali atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 31 (1977)
1977
-
[49]
C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1225 (2010)
2010
-
[50]
Veseth, Spin-rotation interaction in diatomic molecules, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics 4, 20 (1971)
L. Veseth, Spin-rotation interaction in diatomic molecules, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics 4, 20 (1971)
1971
-
[51]
B. Zhu, S. Häfner, B. Tran, M. Gerken, J. Ulmanis, E. Tiemann, and M. Weidemüller, High partial-wave Feshbach resonances in an ultracold 6Li-133Cs mixture (2019), arXiv:1912.01264 [cond-mat.quant-gas]
2019 arXiv
-
[52]
R. J. Le Roy, Long-Range Potential Coefficients From RKR Turning Points: C 6 and C 8 for B( 3Π+ Ou)-State Cl 2, Br2, and I 2, Canadian Journal of Physics 52, 246 (1974)
1974
-
[53]
Gao, Zero-energy bound or quasibound states 15 and their implications for diatomic systems with an asymptotic van der Waals interaction, Phys
B. Gao, Zero-energy bound or quasibound states 15 and their implications for diatomic systems with an asymptotic van der Waals interaction, Phys. Rev. A 62, 050702 (2000)
2000
-
[54]
D. E. Manolopoulos, An improved log derivative method for inelastic scattering, The Journal of Chemical Physics 85, 6425 (1986)
1986
-
[55]
Willner, O
K. Willner, O. Dulieu, and F. Masnou-Seeuws, Mapped grid methods for long-range molecules and cold collisions, The Journal of Chemical Physics 120, 548 (2004)
2004
-
[56]
X. Xie, M. J. Van de Graaff, R. Chapurin, M. D. Frye, J. M. Hutson, J. P. D’Incao, P. S. Julienne, J. Ye, and E. A. Cornell, Observation of Efimov Universality across a Nonuniversal Feshbach Resonance in 39K, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 243401 (2020)
2020
-
[57]
R. J. Wild, P. Makotyn, J. M. Pino, E. A. Cornell, and D. S. Jin, Measurements of Tan’s Contact in an Atomic Bose-Einstein Condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 145305 (2012)
2012
-
[58]
Haze, J.-L
S. Haze, J.-L. Li, D. Dorer, J. P. D’Incao, P. S. Julienne, E. Tiemann, M. Deiß, and J. Hecker Denschlag, Controlling few-body reaction pathways using a feshbach resonance, Nature Physics 21, 228 (2025)
2025
-
[59]
Y. Wang, J. P. D’Incao, and C. H. Greene, Efimov effect for three interacting bosonic dipoles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 233201 (2011)
2011
-
[60]
Y. Wang, J. P. D’Incao, and C. H. Greene, Universal three-body physics for fermionic dipoles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 233201 (2011)
2011
-
[61]
Friedrich and J
H. Friedrich and J. Trost, Working with WKB waves far from the semiclassical limit, Physics Reports 397, 359 (2004)
2004
-
[62]
V. V. Flambaum, G. F. Gribakin, and C. Harabati, Analytical calculation of cold-atom scattering, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1998 (1999)
1999
-
[63]
Dorer, S
D. Dorer, S. Haze, J.-L. Li, J. P. D’Incao, E. Tiemann, P. S. Julienne, M. Deiß, and J. Hecker Denschlag, Steering reaction flux by coupling product channels (2025), arXiv:2504.21727 [physics.atom-ph]
2025
Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.