Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 47 references

Stationary Directed Polymers and Energy Solutions of the Burgers Equation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The stationary semi-discrete directed polymer in a Brownian environment converges, under intermediate disorder scaling, to the unique energy solution of the stochastic Burgers equation, with the proof carried by a second-order…

desk verdict A substantial KPZ-universality result with a real but fixable gap: the transport constant in the stated limit is asserted, not derived. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06591 v1 pith:PYHOD4KW submitted 2019-08-16 math.PR

Milton Jara , Gregorio R. Moreno Flores This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PR MSC 60H1560K3582B44
keywords KPZequationstochasticBurgersdirectedpolymersenergysolutionsBoltzmann-Gibbsprincipleintermediatedisorderlog-partitionincrementsfluctuationfield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that, in the intermediate disorder regime, the stationary semi-discrete directed polymer in a Brownian environment has the increments of its log-partition function converging to the unique energy solution of the stochastic Burgers equation. This matters because it connects a polymer model to the Burgers/KPZ equation without using the Cole-Hopf transform and without spectral gap estimates. The proof's central estimate is a second-order Boltzmann-Gibbs principle, which controls the nonlinear term by replacing local products of the fluctuating field with block averages. The result is one more instance of KPZ universality obtained through the energy-solution route.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the second-order Boltzmann-Gibbs principle: a quantitative replacement of local products of the centered field by block averages. Proposition 1 shows that sums of $\sqrt n \sum_j \{W_{j-1}W_j - \tau_j Q(l,\cdot)\}\phi_j$ vanish in a suitable sense with error $O(l/\sqrt n + T/l^2)$, and Proposition 2 applies the same idea to cubic products $W_{j-1}W_jW_{j+1}$. The quadratic replacement becomes the term $\partial_x u^2$ in the limit; the cubic replacement shows higher-order terms vanish. Around this principle the proof organizes a one-block estimate, Kipnis-Varadhan dynamical estimates, Mitoma tightness, and the energy-solution martingale problem that identifies the limit.

What would settle it

Go through Section 7 keeping every constant in the expansions of $W_j-u_j$ and the generator's antisymmetric part; the value of $c$ is the coefficient of $\int_0^t X_s(\partial_x\phi)\,ds$ that survives in the limit. If that coefficient is not $-9/10$, the equation in Theorem 1 is wrong as stated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under the scaling $\beta = n^{-1/4}$ and $\theta = 1 + 1/(2\sqrt n)$, the fluctuation field $X^n_t(\phi) = \sum_j (u_j(tn)-\rho_n)\phi((j-nt-a_n)/\sqrt n)$, where $u_j$ are the log-partition increments, converges in distribution in $C([0,T],\mathcal S'(\mathbb R))$ to the unique stationary energy solution of $\partial_t u = \frac12 \partial_x^2 u + c\,\partial_x u - \frac12 \partial_x(u^2) + \partial_x W$, with $c=-9/10$ and $W$ space-time white noise. The convergence is for the polymer analogue of the Burgers slope, not the height itself, and the limit is characterized by the energy-solution martingale problem: at each time the field is a white noise, the quadratic term is defined by a limit of block averages, and both forward and time-reversed martingale conditions hold. The proof does not use the Cole-Hopf transform and avoids spectral gap estimates; the nonlinear term emerges from the second-order Boltzmann-Gibbs principle.

Load-bearing premise

The proof relies on a previously established uniqueness theorem for stationary energy solutions of the stochastic Burgers equation; if that uniqueness failed, different subsequences of the polymer model could converge to different limits, and the phrase 'the unique energy solution' in Theorem 1 would be unjustified.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The stationary polymer's log-partition increments and the stochastic Burgers equation share the same equilibrium scaling limit, so the polymer inherits the SPDE's white-noise spatial structure and martingale characterization.
  • Convergence to Burgers for this model does not need a discrete Cole-Hopf transform, so the energy-solution route is available for polymer models lacking an explicit integrable transform.
  • The same proof transfers to systems of coupled diffusions with a potential that is quadratic at zero, as noted in Remark 3, whenever the dynamics is well defined.
  • The drift $c=-9/10$ is a centering artefact: a change of coordinates in the equation, or a more careful discrete centering, removes it and leaves the standard stochastic Burgers equation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The estimates in the proof are local in space, so a local-equilibrium version for non-stationary initial data is a plausible extension, although the paper explicitly restricts to the stationary setting.
  • Because $c=-9/10$ is stated without derivation, an independent computation of the drift from the generator's antisymmetric part would either confirm Theorem 1 or show that only the centering of test functions needs adjustment.
  • The block size $l \sim \sqrt{(t-s)n}$ used in the proof suggests the limiting antisymmetric term has a $3/2$ Hölder modulus in time; checking this exponent would be a sharper quantitative test of the convergence mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the stationary O'Connell-Yor semi-discrete directed polymer model in a Brownian environment under intermediate-disorder scaling β = n^{-1/4}, θ = 1 + 1/(2√n). The main result, Theorem 1, states that the fluctuation field of the centered increments of the log-partition function converges in distribution in C([0,T], S'(R)) to the unique stationary energy solution of the stochastic Burgers equation ∂_t u = 1/2 ∂_x^2 u + c ∂_x u - 1/2 ∂_x u^2 + ∂_x W, where c is an explicit constant. The proof is based on the martingale decomposition of the system of SDEs satisfied by the increments, a second-order Boltzmann-Gibbs principle replacing local nonlinearities by block averages, and the energy-solution framework of Gonçalves-Jara and Gubinelli-Perkovski. The approach does not use the Cole-Hopf transform and does not rely on spectral gap estimates. The paper contains a detailed exposition of the static estimates, dynamical estimates, tightness, and identification of the limiting quadratic term via the energy solution formalism.

Significance. If the proof can be completed, the result is a significant contribution: it establishes a new instance of KPZ universality for the stationary O'Connell-Yor polymer using the energy-solution route, independent of the Cole-Hopf transform. The second-order Boltzmann-Gibbs principle for this non-polynomial model is a substantial technical advance, and the paper carefully separates the symmetric and antisymmetric parts of the generator. The manuscript also benefits from transparent static computations for the stationary measure and from the use of the existing uniqueness theorem for energy solutions instead of an ad hoc limiting argument. I see no circularity: the target equation is not assumed, and the estimates are independent of the value of c. However, the central identification of the limit equation is incomplete because the transport constant c is never derived, and several load-bearing L2 computations are only asserted. These gaps must be repaired before the result is fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 1.3, Theorem 1 and Remark 1; Section 7.2] The limit equation is not identified because the transport constant c is never computed. Remark 1 states that c = -9/10 "can be obtained by careful bookkeeping along the proof," but no coefficient is assembled in Sections 6 or 7. Section 7.2 only states that the linear terms converge to transport terms, and the displayed comparison there involves β² u_j and (1/√n) W_j, not the full list of linear and constant terms produced in the expansion of Section 6.3, which includes -β²/2 and -(1/6)β² u_j. Since Definition 3 includes c in the martingale problem, and the imported uniqueness theorem of [23] applies to that fixed equation, the conclusion "the unique energy solution of (4)" is not supported as written. The missing bookkeeping is load-bearing: if the assembled coefficient differs from -9/10, the stated limit equation is wrong, even if the qualitative energy-solution universality survives after a Galilean shift.
  2. [Section 5.2, Proposition 1; Appendix A, eq. (8)] Several error bounds that are essential to the proof are asserted rather than derived. In Proposition 1, the bound for the term involving β²/l times the block average is justified by a "careful L2 computation" whose dependency-blocking step is only sketched. In Appendix A, the bounds on the error terms E_j^{(i)}, the replacement of u_j^2 by W_j^2, the index-shift estimate for W_j^3 - W_{j-1}^3, and the removal of the centering in the order-three monomials are each delegated to "simple L2 computation" or "straightforward adaptation" without displaying the calculations. These estimates are precisely what forces the cubic terms to vanish or to contribute only transport terms, so the identification of the anti-symmetric part in Section 7.5 depends on them. The authors should display these computations or provide enough detail for a reader to verify them independently.
  3. [Section 7.5] The passage from the convergence of the fluctuation field to the convergence of the quadratic block averages involving the indicator ι_ε is delegated to a reference to [17], Section 5.3. Since ι_ε is not a Schwartz function and this step is needed to identify the limiting quadratic action A^ε_{s,t}, the adaptation should be summarized rather than only cited, especially because the paper otherwise takes care to prove or state each estimate used in the identification.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 7.2] In the displayed estimate for the linear term, the notation ∇nϕ n_t is inconsistent with the surrounding equations, where the test function is denoted ϕ n_j; this should be corrected.
  2. [Section 6.3] The sentence "The term β² u_j is easily seen to be tight" is imprecise: the term is bounded in L2 uniformly in n, and later in Section 7.2 it converges to a transport term rather than vanishing. The wording should be adjusted to reflect the actual role of the term.
  3. [Section 2, Definition 3] The definition of an energy solution is stated for a fixed constant c, and the proof relies on the uniqueness theorem of [23]. The paper should make explicit that the uniqueness theorem applies for every real c, or cite the precise statement, since c is not used in any of the estimates before Section 7.
  4. [Appendix A] In the paragraph after eq. (8), the removal of the centering uses the tightness of order-two terms; the sentence "as we know that the terms of order two are tight" should give a specific reference to the estimates in Section 6.3 rather than referring to the preceding discussion in general terms.
  5. [Section 1.1 and Section 1.3] There are minor typographical issues: "an huge body of work" should be "a huge body of work," and the notation introducing h_{β,θ} = log Z_{β,θ} and u_{β,θ} is missing a comma after Z_{β,θ}.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: derivation is self-contained; transport constant c is explicitly acknowledged but not computed.

full rationale

The paper proves convergence of the stationary O'Connell-Yor increment field to an energy solution of the stochastic Burgers equation by a self-contained martingale decomposition, tightness estimates, and a second-order Boltzmann-Gibbs principle proved in Sections 5-7. The target equation is not used as an input, and no parameter is fitted to the limiting object. Energy-solution uniqueness is imported from Gubinelli-Perkovski [23], an external theorem not authored by the present authors; although the uniqueness class includes the transport coefficient c, this is ordinary external support rather than self-citation. Self-citations such as [19] and [32] provide techniques, but the needed estimates for the O'Connell-Yor model are proven here. The main gap is the transport constant c: Theorem 1 calls it explicit, but Remark 1 states 'The precise value of c can be obtained by careful bookkeeping along the proof. We found it to be -9/10,' while Section 7.2 only asserts that 'all linear terms appearing in the previous section converge to transport terms.' This is an omitted bookkeeping computation, not circularity: c is neither defined in terms of the target solution nor fitted from limiting data. The absence of an assembled computation weakens the identification of the limit equation, but it does not make the derivation circular. Score 1 reflects the minor non-load-bearing self-citations and the acknowledged missing computation of c as a completeness concern.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This derivation has no fitted parameters; the scaling is fixed by the intermediate disorder regime and the transport constant is a claimed derived value, not a fit. No new entities or forces are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Existence and uniqueness of energy solutions for the stochastic Burgers equation, imported from Goncalves-Jara [17] and Gubinelli-Perkovski [23].
    The paper's identification of the limit as 'the unique energy solution' relies on this external martingale-problem formulation and the uniqueness theorem.
  • standard math Kipnis-Varadhan estimate for the stationary process, adapted from [14] Corollary 3.5.
    Used as a black box to bound dynamical fluctuations of additive functionals throughout Section 5.
  • domain assumption The invariant measure of the increments is the i.i.d. log-Gamma product with the stated stationarity property, from O'Connell-Yor [40].
    The whole proof operates under this stationary measure, and the integration-by-parts identity for the generator uses its exact form.
  • standard math Mitoma's criterion for tightness in S'(R), from [37].
    Used in Section 6 to reduce tightness of the field to tightness of real-valued projections.
  • standard math Approximation of the indicator function i_epsilon by Schwartz functions to pass to the energy term, citing [17] Section 5.3.
    Needed in Section 7.5 to identify the limit of the block-averaged quadratic term as A^epsilon.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stationary Directed Polymers and Energy Solutions of the Burgers Equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PYHOD4KW

@misc{pith2026190806591,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stationary Directed Polymers and Energy Solutions of the Burgers Equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PYHOD4KW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06591}
}
read the original abstract

We consider the stationary O'Connell-Yor model of semi-discrete directed polymers in a Brownian environment in the intermediate disorder regime and show convergence of the increments of the log-partition function to the energy solutions of the stochastic Burgers equation. The proof does not rely on the Cole-Hopf transform and avoids the use of spectral gap estimates for the discrete model. The key technical argument is a second-order Boltzmann-Gibbs principle.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    and Simon, M

    Goncalves, P., Jara, M. and Simon, M. (2017) Second order Boltzmann-Gibbs principle for polyno- mial functions and applications , J. Stat. Phys. 166, no. 1, 90113

    work page 2017

  2. [32]

    and Moreno Flores, G

    Jara, M. and Moreno Flores, G. (2019) Scaling of the Sasamoto-Spohn model in equilibrium , Elec- tron. Commun. Probab., 24, paper no. 3, 12 pp

    work page 2019

  3. [38]

    and Remenik, D., in preparation

    Moreno Flores, G., Quastel, J. and Remenik, D., in preparation

    work page

  4. [23]

    and Perkowski, N

    Gubinelli, M. and Perkowski, N. (2018) Energy solutions of KPZ are unique , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 31, 427-471

    work page 2018

  5. [17]

    and Jara, M

    Goncalves, P. and Jara, M. (2014) Nonlinear fluctuations of weakly asymmetric interacting pa rticle systems, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 212, no. 2, 597-644

    work page 2014

  6. [1]

    and Stegun, I

    Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A. (1992) Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables , Dover, New York

    work page 1992

  7. [2]

    and Quastel, J

    Alberts, T., Khanin, K. and Quastel, J. (2014) The intermediate disorder regime for directed polymers in dimension 1 + 1 , Ann. Probab. 42, 12121256

    work page 2014

  8. [3]

    and Quastel (2014) The continuum directed random polymer

    Alberts, T, Khanin K. and Quastel (2014) The continuum directed random polymer. J. Stat. Phys. 154, (1), 154- 305

    work page 2014

Show all 47 references
  1. [4]

    (1981) Weak convergence and the general theory of processes , Unpublished notes

    Aldous, D. (1981) Weak convergence and the general theory of processes , Unpublished notes

    1981

  2. [5]

    and Quastel, J

    Amir, G., Corwin, I. and Quastel, J. (2010) Probability distribution of the free energy of the con- tinuum directed random polymer in 1 + 1 dimensions , Comm. Pure. Appl. Math. 64, (4), 466- 537

    2010

  3. [6]

    and Simon, M

    Bernardin, C., Goncalves, P., Jara, M. and Simon, M. (2018) Nonlinear Perturbation of a Noisy Hamiltonian Lattice Field Model: Universality Persistenc e, Comm. Math. Phys. 361, 2, 605-659 STATIONARY DIRECTED POLYMERS 25

    2018

  4. [7]

    and Giacomin, G

    Bertini, L. and Giacomin, G. (1997) Stochastic Burgers and KPZ equations from particle systems , Comm. Math. Phys. 183, (3), 571- 607

    1997

  5. [8]

    (2018) SpaceTime Discrete KPZ Equation , Comm

    Cannizzaro, G., and Matetski, K. (2018) SpaceTime Discrete KPZ Equation , Comm. Math. Phys. 358, 2, 521-588

    2018

  6. [9]

    and Chouk, K

    Catellier, R. and Chouk, K. (2018) Paracontrolled distributions and the 3-dimensional stoch astic quantization equation , Ann. Probab. 46, 5, 26212679

    2018

  7. [10]

    and Perkowski, N

    Chouk, K., Gairing, J. and Perkowski, N. (2017) An invariance principle for the two-dimensional parabolic Anderson model with small potential , Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput. 5, no. 4, 520558

    2017

  8. [11]

    (2017) Directed Polymers in Random Environment: ´Ecole d’ ´Et´ e de Probabilit´ es de Saint-Flour XL VI 2016, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 2175, Springer

    Comets, F. (2017) Directed Polymers in Random Environment: ´Ecole d’ ´Et´ e de Probabilit´ es de Saint-Flour XL VI 2016, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 2175, Springer

    2017

  9. [12]

    (2012) The Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation and universality class , Random Matrices The- ory Appl

    Corwin, I. (2012) The Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation and universality class , Random Matrices The- ory Appl. 1,1130001

    2012

  10. [13]

    (2017) KardarParisiZhang Equation and Large Deviations for Rando m Walks in Weak Random Environments , J

    Corwin, I and Gu, Y. (2017) KardarParisiZhang Equation and Large Deviations for Rando m Walks in Weak Random Environments , J. Stat. Phys. 166, 1, 150-168

    2017

  11. [14]

    and Perkowski, N

    Diehl, J., Gubinelli, M. and Perkowski, N. (2016) The Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation as scaling limit of weakly asymmetric interacting Brownian motions , Comm. Math. Phys. 354, no. 2, 549-589

    2016

  12. [15]

    Ferrari, P. L. and Spohn, H. (2011) Random growth models , in The Oxford handbook of random matrix theory, 782801, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2011

    2011

  13. [16]

    (1988) Convergence towards Burgers equation and propagation of ch aos for weakly asymmetric exclusion processes , Stoch

    Gartner, J. (1988) Convergence towards Burgers equation and propagation of ch aos for weakly asymmetric exclusion processes , Stoch. Proc. and Appl. 27, 233-260

    1988

  14. [18]

    and Sethuraman, S

    Goncalves, P., Jara, M. and Sethuraman, S. (2015) A stochastic Burgers equation from a class of microscopic interactions, Ann. Probab. 43, 1, 286-338

    2015

  15. [20]

    and Jara, M

    Gubinelli, M. and Jara, M. (2013) Regularization by noise and stochastic Burgers equations , Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput. 1, no. 2, 325350

    2013

  16. [21]

    and Perkowski, N

    Gubinelli, M. and Perkowski, N. (2016) The Hairer-Quastel universality result in equilibrium , In: Stochastic analysis on large scale interacting systems, 101115, RI MS Kˆ okyˆ uroku Bessatsu, B59, Res. Inst. Math. Sci. (RIMS), Kyoto, 2016

    2016

  17. [22]

    and Perkowski, N

    Gubinelli, M. and Perkowski, N. (2017) KPZ reloaded, Comm. Math. Phys. 349, no. 1, 165269

    2017

  18. [24]

    and Perkowski, N

    Gubinelli, M. and Perkowski, N. (2018) Probabilistic approach to the stochastic Burgers equation, In: Eberle A., Grothaus M., Hoh W., Kassmann M., Stannat W., Trutnau G. ( eds) Stochastic Partial Differential Equations and Related Fields. SPDERF 2016. Springer Pr oceedings in M...

    2018

  19. [25]

    and Perkowski, N

    Gubinelli, M. and Perkowski, N. (2018) The infinitesimal generator of the stochastic Burgers equa- tion, preprint, arXiv:1810.12014

    2018 arXiv

  20. [26]

    (2013) Solving the KPZ equation , Annals of Mathematics 178, 559664

    Hairer, M. (2013) Solving the KPZ equation , Annals of Mathematics 178, 559664

    2013

  21. [27]

    (2014) A theory of regularity structures , Inv

    Hairer, M. (2014) A theory of regularity structures , Inv. Math. 198, 2, 269-504

    2014

  22. [28]

    and Matetski, K

    Hairer, M. and Matetski, K. (2018) Discretisations of rough stochastic PDEs , Ann. Probab. 46, 3, 1651-1709

    2018

  23. [29]

    and Quastel, J

    Hairer, M. and Quastel, J. (2018) A class of growth models rescaling to KPZ , Forum Math. Pi 6, e3, 112 pp

    2018

  24. [30]

    and Xu, W

    Hairer, M. and Xu, W. (2019) Large-scale limit of interface fluctuation models , to appear in Ann. of Probab

    2019

  25. [31]

    Henley and C

    D. Henley and C. Huse (1985) Pinning and roughening of domain wall in Ising systems due to random impurities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2708–2711 26 MILTON JARA AND GREGORIO R. MORENO FLORES

    1985

  26. [33]

    (1986) Dynamic scaling of growing interfaces Phys

    Kardar, M., Parisi, G and Zhang, Y–C. (1986) Dynamic scaling of growing interfaces Phys. Rev. Lett., 56(9):889892

    1986

  27. [34]

    Surveys 15, 156-242

    Labb´ e, C (2018) On the scaling limits of weakly asymmetric bridges , Probab. Surveys 15, 156-242

    2018

  28. [35]

    and Perkowski, N

    Martin, J. and Perkowski, N. (2017) Paracontrolled distributions on Bravais lattices and weak universality of the 2d parabolic Anderson model , preprint, arXiv:1704.08653

    2017 arXiv

  29. [36]

    and Otto, F

    Menz, G. and Otto, F. (2013) Uniform logarithmic sobolev inequalities for conservativ e spin systems with super-quadratic single-site potential , Ann. Probab. 41, 3, 208-238

    2013

  30. [37]

    (1983) Tightness of probabilities in C([0,1], Y′) and D([0,1], Y′), Ann

    Mitoma, I. (1983) Tightness of probabilities in C([0,1], Y′) and D([0,1], Y′), Ann. Probab., 11, 4, 989-999

    1983

  31. [39]

    and Valko, B

    Moreno Flores, G., Seppalainen, T. and Valko, B. (2014) Fluctuation exponents for directed poly- mers in the intermediate disorder regime. Electron. J. Probab. 19, (89), 28 pp, (2014)

    2014

  32. [40]

    O’Connell, N. and Yor. M. (2001) Brownian analogues of Burke’s theorem. Stochastic Process. Appl. 96, (2), 285- 304

    2001

  33. [41]

    and Rosati, T

    Perkowski, N. and Rosati, T. C. (2018) The KPZ equation on the real line , preprint, arXiv:1808.00354

    2018 arXiv

  34. [42]

    and Spohn, H

    Sasamoto, T. and Spohn, H. (2009) Superdiffusivity of the 1D Lattice Kardar-Parisi-Zhang Equ a- tion, J. Stat. Phys., 137: 917935

    2009

  35. [43]

    (2010) Bounds for scaling exponents for a 1+1 dimensional directed polymer in a Brownian environment , Alea 7, 451-476

    Seppalainen, T., Valko, B. (2010) Bounds for scaling exponents for a 1+1 dimensional directed polymer in a Brownian environment , Alea 7, 451-476

    2010

  36. [44]

    (2014) KPZ scaling theory and the semidiscrete directed polymer mo del, Random Matri- ces, MSRI Publications, Vol

    Spohn, H. (2014) KPZ scaling theory and the semidiscrete directed polymer mo del, Random Matri- ces, MSRI Publications, Vol. 65

    2014

  37. [45]

    and Quastel, J

    Spohn, H. and Quastel, J. (2015) The One-Dimensional KPZ Equation and Its Universality Clas s, J. Stat. Phys. 160, 4, 965-984

    2015

  38. [46]

    and Sano, M

    Takeuchi, K. and Sano, M. (2012) Evidence for Geometry-Dependent Universal Fluctuations o f the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang Interfaces in Liquid-Crystal Turbul ence, J. Stat. Phys. 147, 5, 853-890

    2012

  39. [47]

    (2012) Introduction to KPZ , Curr

    Quastel, J. (2012) Introduction to KPZ , Curr. Dev. Math. 2011, 125194, Int. Press, Somerville, MA (Milton Jara) Instituto de Matem ´atica Pura e Aplicada, Estrada Dona Castorina 110, 22460320 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil E-mail address : mjara@impa.br (Gregorio R. Moreno Flores) F ...

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.