Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 48 references

Nonlocal approximation of an anisotropic cross-diffusion system

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that the anisotropic nonlocal cross-diffusion system converges, as the viscosity parameter goes to zero, to a local degenerate cross-diffusion system, using an entropy-dissipation identity that holds for every weak…

desk verdict A genuinely new anisotropic localization limit with a sound entropy-comparison strategy, but the manuscript as written has a missing factor in the Section 6 weak form that breaks the central proof until fixed. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.20188 v1 pith:PYJ7CB2P submitted 2024-12-28 math.AP

Tomasz Dębiec , Markus Schmidtchen This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35K5747N6035B4535K5535K6535Q92
keywords InviscidLimitBrinkman-to-DarcyTissueGrowthAnisotropicParabolic-HyperbolicCross-DiffusionSystemsentropydissipationidentitynonlocal-to-localweaksolutionsdegenerateparabolic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves a vanishing-viscosity (localisation) limit for a two-species anisotropic cross-diffusion system from population dynamics. The system couples the species densities $n^{(i)}_\nu$ to a velocity potential $m_\nu$ through an anisotropic Brinkman equation, and the theorem shows that as $\nu \to 0$ a subsequence of weak solutions converges to a weak solution of the corresponding local degenerate system. The proof rests on an entropy-dissipation identity that is shown to hold for every weak solution of the nonlocal system, giving uniform bounds that lead to strong convergence of the total density and of the anisotropic velocity field. If the theorem is correct, the local anisotropic model with Darcy-type relation $v = A\nabla p$ is recovered as the limit of a regularised nonlocal model, a case left open by earlier works.

What carries the argument

The key object is the Boltzmann-Shannon entropy $H[n]=\int n(\log n-1)\,dx$ and the entropy-dissipation identity (Proposition 4.1), which holds for any weak solution: $H[n_\nu(T)]-H[n_{\rm in}] - \int_0^T\int n_\nu\nabla\cdot(A\nabla m_\nu)\,dx\,dt = \int_0^T\int \log n_\nu(n^{(1)}_\nu G^{(1)}(n_\nu)+n^{(2)}_\nu G^{(2)}(n_\nu))\,dx\,dt$. The identity is obtained by mollifying the total-density equation and controlling the DiPerna-Lions commutator; together with the anisotropic Brinkman equation it yields the uniform dissipation bound that controls $\sqrt{n_\nu}\nabla m_\nu$ and $\nabla m_\nu$ in $L^2$. The same machinery is then applied to the limiting equation, and comparing the two entropy identities gives the upper semi-continuity of the quadratic dissipation $\int\nabla m_\nu\cdot A\nabla m_\nu$, which combined with weak lower semi-continuity forces strong $L^2$ convergence of $\nabla m_\nu$.

What would settle it

Take the simplest nontrivial case, $G^{(i)}\equiv 0$ and constant elliptic tensor $A$, and solve the nonlocal system (2) numerically on a bounded interval with smooth initial data; the entropy identity (9) should hold up to discretization error, and $\|\nabla m_\nu-\nabla n_0\|_{L^2}$ should tend to zero as $\nu\to0$. A persistent violation of the entropy identity, or a sequence of weak solutions for which $\int_0^T\int n_\nu|\nabla m_\nu|^2$ is not bounded uniformly in $\nu$, would falsify the paper's central convergence claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the anisotropic version of the nonlocal-to-local limit is valid at the level of weak solutions. For each $\nu>0$ the paper considers weak solutions of $\partial_t n^{(i)}_\nu = \nabla\cdot(n^{(i)}_\nu A\nabla m_\nu)+n^{(i)}_\nu G^{(i)}(n_\nu)$ coupled with $-\nu\nabla\cdot(A\nabla m_\nu)+m_\nu=n_\nu$, where $A$ is symmetric and uniformly elliptic and $G^{(i)}$ are decreasing homeostatic growth functions. Theorem 1.1 states that, up to a subsequence, $n^{(i)}_\nu$ converges weak-$*$ in $L^\infty(0,T;L^1\cap L^\infty)$, the total density $n_\nu=n^{(1)}_\nu+n^{(2)}_\nu$ converges strongly in $L^2$, $m_\nu$ converges weakly in $L^2(0,T;H^1)$ and strongly in $L^2$, and the limit pair $(n^{(1)}_0,n^{(2)}_0)$ is a weak solution of the local system $\partial_t n^{(i)}_0=\nabla\cdot(n^{(i)}_0 A\nabla n_0)+n^{(i)}_0 G^{(i)}(n_0)$ with $n_0=n^{(1)}_0+n^{(2)}_0$. The proof upgrades weak convergence of $\nabla m_\nu$ to strong convergence by comparing the entropy identity for the nonlocal system with the entropy identity for the limit, using the fact that $A$ defines an inner product.

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes that for every $\nu>0$ the nonlocal system has at least one weak solution with the uniform bounds $0\le n_\nu\le\bar n$, $n_\nu\in C([0,T];L^2)$, and $A\nabla m_\nu\in L^2(0,T;H^1)$; the existence statement is asserted in Section 2 with references to approximation schemes, not proved in this paper, and the $L^\infty$-bound in Lemma 3.1 is justified by a formal maximum-principle argument that may not apply directly to weak solutions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The anisotropic Darcy-type case $v=A\nabla p$, which earlier existence results excluded because of strong assumptions on the diffusion matrix, is now covered: the nonlocal system converges to the local degenerate cross-diffusion system (4).
  • The entropy-dissipation identity is available for any weak solution, so the proof does not need extra regularity beyond the natural weak formulation and can be reused in other anisotropic parabolic-hyperbolic systems.
  • The strong convergence of $\nabla m_\nu$ and of $n_\nu$ means the velocity field of the limiting population model is genuinely obtained from the nonlocal approximations, not merely in a distributional sense.
  • The nonlocal Brinkman-regularised system can serve as a well-posed approximating model for the local anisotropic system, since any sequence of its weak solutions has a subsequence converging to a weak solution of the local system.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same two-entropy comparison argument should extend to more than two species or to pressure laws with different nonlinearities, as long as a total-density entropy identity and an elliptic coupling equation are available.
  • Because the existence of weak solutions is only asserted and cited, a fully self-contained version of Theorem 1.1 would need a proof that the parabolic approximation schemes produce solutions satisfying the uniform $L^\infty$ and regularity bounds; the convergence argument itself is independent of which scheme is used.
  • A quantitative rate for the convergence $m_\nu\to n_0$ and $\nabla m_\nu\to\nabla n_0$ might be obtained by tracking the $\nu$-dependence in the entropy comparison, but the paper does not pursue this.
  • Numerically, the strong convergence of $\nabla m_\nu$ suggests that computing the limiting local model through the nonlocal regularisation with small $\nu$ should give accurate gradients, not just accurate densities.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the singular limit ν→0 in a nonlocal anisotropic cross-diffusion system (2): two continuity equations for species densities n_ν^(1), n_ν^(2), with a common velocity field −A∇m_ν, coupled through the anisotropic Brinkman equation −ν∇·(A∇m_ν)+m_ν=n_ν. The main result, Theorem 1.1, asserts that along a subsequence the nonlocal solutions converge to a weak solution of the local system (4), with strong L2 convergence of the total density n_ν and of the velocity gradient ∇m_ν. The proof strategy is to obtain ν-uniform estimates, prove an entropy identity for weak solutions of the nonlocal system, exploit the entropy dissipation to get compactness of m_ν and n_ν, pass to the limit in the total-density equation, and finally compare the entropy identities for ν>0 and ν=0 to upgrade weak convergence of ∇m_ν to strong convergence, which allows passage to the limit in the equations for the individual species.

Significance. If the proof is carried out correctly, the result fills a genuine gap: localisation limits for anisotropic degenerate cross-diffusion systems are not covered by the existing isotropic literature. The mollified entropy equality in Section 4 and the anisotropic velocity regularity in Section 2.1 are useful building blocks, and the argument is genuinely analytical with no fitted parameters or reverse-engineered quantities. However, the manuscript in its current form contains several load-bearing gaps, most notably an incorrect weak form of the limit total-density equation and an unproved existence/L∞-bound assertion. These issues are local and repairable, so the paper is not beyond revision, but it cannot be accepted as written.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 6, Eq. (11)] The weak form displayed at the beginning of Section 6 is not the weak form of Eq. (3): the flux term is written as ∫∇φ·A∇m_ν dx dt, whereas summing the two equations in Definition 2.1 gives ∫ n_ν∇φ·A∇m_ν dx dt. Consequently the limiting equation (11) contains ∫∇φ·A∇n_0 instead of ∫ n_0∇φ·A∇n_0, i.e. it is the weak form of a linear diffusion equation and not of ∂_t n_0 = ∇·(n_0A∇n_0)+… as stated immediately afterwards. This error propagates into the entropy identity (12), because that identity is derived from the wrong limit equation. The proof of Theorem 1.1 is therefore incomplete at this step. The correction is local: restore the missing factors n_ν and n_0 in the two flux terms, and then pass to the limit using Lemma 5.2 together with ∇m_ν ⇀ ∇n_0 in L2.
  2. [Section 2 and Lemma 3.1] Existence of weak solutions to System (2) for fixed ν is asserted but not proved, and the asserted regularity A∇m ∈ L2(0,T;H1) inherits the same status. More importantly, Lemma 3.1 supplies the ν-uniform L∞ bound 0≤n_ν≤n̄, but its proof is explicitly formal: it selects a maximum point (x*,t*) of n_ν and uses pointwise relations such as ∂_t n_ν=0 and ∇n_ν=0, which are not available for the weak solutions in Definition 2.1 (they are only known to have n ∈ C([0,T];L2)). Because the uniform L∞ bound underpins Lemmas 3.2–3.6, Corollary 4.2, and hence the whole compactness argument, this is a load-bearing gap. The authors should either give a complete approximation argument establishing existence and the L∞ bound, or state the existence theorem with precise hypotheses that explicitly include the bound.
  3. [Lemma 5.2] The displayed chain of equalities in Lemma 5.2 is not correct as written. From Brinkman’s equation one has m_ν−n_ν=ν∇·(A∇m_ν), so ||m_ν−n_ν||^2_{L2} = ν^2||∇·(A∇m_ν)||^2_{L2} = −ν∫ n_ν∇·(A∇m_ν) dx dt − ν∫ ∇m_ν·A∇m_ν dx dt. The second displayed line in the proof appears to have the wrong sign and to omit the factor ν on the second term. The bound ≤ Cν also needs an argument: it follows from the entropy identity (9) and the relation −∫ n_ν∇·(A∇m_ν) = ∫ ∇m_ν·A∇m_ν + ν||∇·(A∇m_ν)||^2, together with boundedness of −∫ n_ν∇·(A∇m_ν). This chain should be written out. Since Lemma 5.2 is the only place proving n_ν→n_0 strongly in L2, the gap is central.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and keywords] The keyword list ('Inviscid Limit, Brinkman-to-Darcy Limit, Tissue Growth') does not match the nonlocal approximation content of the paper and should be updated to reflect the anisotropic nonlocal-to-local limit studied here.
  2. [Theorem 1.1] The notation n_ν^(i) ⇀* n_0^(i) in L∞(0,T;L1∩L∞) is not standard, since L1∩L∞ is not a dual space in an obvious way; the authors should state the convergence more precisely as weak-* in L∞(0,T;L∞) and weak in L1.
  3. [Section 6, Eq. (11)] There are typographical inconsistencies in the test functions: Eq. (11) writes φ(0) where Definition 2.1 uses ϕ(x,0), and the text switches between ϕ and φ without comment.
  4. [Section 7] The convergence React_ν→React_0 is delegated to references [16, Section 4.2] and [22, Section 4]; since at that stage only the total density converges strongly while the individual densities converge weakly, a short justification in the anisotropic setting would improve readability and completeness.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the nonlocal-to-local limit follows from ν-uniform a priori estimates and entropy identities; self-citations are auxiliary and not restatements of the main theorem.

full rationale

The paper's claimed derivation is a direct analytical compactness argument. The main theorem is not obtained by fitting a parameter, by defining a quantity in terms of the target limit, or by importing a uniqueness or ansatz result from the authors' prior work. The entropy identity (Prop. 4.1) is proved for arbitrary weak solutions, and the uniform estimates in §3 and strong-compactness lemmas in §5 are derived from the ν-system itself. The self-references in §2 (existence of ν-solutions, citing [1,16,22,25]) and §7 (Reactν→React0, citing [16, Sec. 4.2] and [22, Sec. 4]) are supporting external results, not equations that reduce to the theorem's conclusion; even the paper explicitly labels the existence claim as 'simply claim' and gives no proof, which is a completeness gap rather than circularity. The internal inconsistency in §6 (the displayed weak form of Eq. (3) omits the factor nν in the flux, so Eq. (11) as written is the weak form of ∂n0/∂t=∇·(A∇n0)+..., not of ∂n0/∂t=∇·(n0A∇n0)+...) is a mathematical error in the proof; it is serious but it does not constitute a circular reduction of the conclusion to the hypotheses. No step of the form 'X is defined from Y, then X predicts Y' or 'fitted parameter renamed as prediction' occurs. Accordingly the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the analysis is deterministic. The central derivation rests on two substantive unproved inputs (existence of anisotropic weak solutions and the formal L∞ bound) plus standard analytic tools and cited auxiliary convergence results. There are no invented entities.

assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper Existence of weak solutions to System (2) for each ν>0 with properties 0≤n(i)≤¯n and A∇mν∈L2(0,T;H1(Rd)).
    Section 2 states this as a claim without proof; references are to isotropic approximation schemes, and the anisotropic case is not covered directly.
  • ad hoc to paper Uniform L∞ bound 0≤nν≤¯n for the total density, obtained via a maximum-principle argument at a point (x*,t*).
    Lemma 3.1 gives a formal proof; the differentiability at the maximum point is not justified for weak solutions, so the bound is effectively an assumption.
  • standard math Commutator estimate for mollified transport terms, from Lions [38, Lemma 2.3].
    Used in Proposition 4.1 to pass the commutator to zero in the entropy identity; standard DiPerna-Lions theory.
  • domain assumption Convergence of reaction terms Reactν → React0 and weak convergence of nν(T) ⇀ n0(T), cited from Debiec et al. [16, Section 4.2] and [22, Section 4].
    Section 7 uses these as black boxes; they are self-cited results on the isotropic or related setting, not proved in this paper.
  • standard math Aubin-Lions lemma and standard Sobolev compactness results.
    Used in Lemma 5.1 to obtain strong compactness of mν; standard analytic tool.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonlocal approximation of an anisotropic cross-diffusion system." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PYJ7CB2P

@misc{pith2026241220188,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonlocal approximation of an anisotropic cross-diffusion system},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PYJ7CB2P}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.20188}
}
read the original abstract

Localisation limits and nonlocal approximations of degenerate parabolic systems have experienced a renaissance in recent years. However, only few results cover anisotropic systems. This work addresses this gap by establishing the nonlocal-to-limit for a specific anisotropic cross-diffusion system encountered in population dynamics featuring phase-separation phenomena, i.e., internal layers between different species. A critical element of the proof is an entropy dissipation identity, which we show to hold for any weak solution.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    F. B. Belgacem and P .-E. Jabin. Compactness for nonlinea r continuity equations. J. Funct. Anal., 264(1):139–168, 2013

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Bertsch, M

    M. Bertsch, M. Gurtin, and D. Hilhorst. On a degenerate di ffusion equation of the form c (z) t= ϑ (zx) x with application to population dynamics. Journal of differential equations, 67(1):56–89, 1987. NONLOCAL APPROXIMATION OF ANISOTROPIC DIFFUSION 17

    work page 1987

  3. [3]

    Bertsch, M

    M. Bertsch, M. E. Gurtin, D. Hilhorst, et al. On interacti ng populations that dis- perse to avoid crowding: the case of equal dispersal velocit ies. Nonlinear Anal , 11(4):493–499, 1987

    work page 1987

  4. [4]

    Bertsch, M

    M. Bertsch, M. E. Gurtin, D. Hilhorst, and L. A. Peletier. On interacting populations that disperse to avoid crowding: preservation of segregati on. Journal of mathemati- cal biology, 23:1–13, 1985

    work page 1985

  5. [5]

    Bertsch, D

    M. Bertsch, D. Hilhorst, H. Izuhara, M. Mimura, et al. A no nlinear parabolic- hyperbolic system for contact inhibition of cell-growth. Differ. Equ. Appl, 4(1):137– 157, 2012

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Burger and A

    M. Burger and A. Esposito. Porous medium equation and cro ss-diffusion systems as limit of nonlocal interaction. Nonlinear Analysis, 235:113347, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    S. N. Busenberg and C. C. Travis. Epidemic models with spa tial spread due to population migration. Journal of Mathematical Biology , 16(2):181–198, 1983

    work page 1983

  8. [8]

    J. A. Carrillo, K. Craig, and F. S. Patacchini. A blob meth od for diffusion. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 58(2):58:53, 2019

    work page 2019

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    J. A. Carrillo, C. Elbar, and J. Skrzeczkowski. Degenera te Cahn-Hilliard systems: From nonlocal to local. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11929 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  2. [10]

    J. A. Carrillo, A. Esposito, J. Skrzeczkowski, and J. S. -H. Wu. Nonlocal particle approximation for linear and fast diffusion equations. arXiv: 2408.02345 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    J. A. Carrillo, A. Esposito, and J. S.-H. Wu. Nonlocal ap proximation of nonlinear diffusion equations. arXiv: 2302.08248 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    J. A. Carrillo, S. Fagioli, F. Santambrogio, and M. Schm idtchen. Splitting schemes and segregation in reaction cross-diffusion systems. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 50(5):5695–5718, 2018

    2018

  5. [13]

    J. A. Carrillo, Y . Huang, and M. Schmidtchen. Zoology of a nonlocal cross-diffusion model for two species. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics , 78(2):1078–1104, 2018

    2018

  6. [14]

    Colombo, G

    M. Colombo, G. Crippa, and L. V . Spinolo. On the singular local limit for conser- vation laws with nonlocal fluxes. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 233(3):1131–1167, 2019

    2019

  7. [15]

    Craig, M

    K. Craig, M. Jacobs, and O. Turanova. Nonlocal approxim ation of slow and fast diffusion. arXiv: 2312.11438 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    David, T

    N. David, T. D˛ ebiec, M. Mandal, and M. Schmidtchen. A de generate cross- diffusion system as the inviscid limit of a nonlocal tissue g rowth model. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 56(2):2090–2114, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    D˛ ebiec, B

    T. D˛ ebiec, B. Perthame, M. Schmidtchen, and N. Vauchel et. Incompressible limit for a two-species model with coupling through Brinkman’s la w in any dimension. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) , 145:204–239, 2021

    2021

  10. [18]

    D˛ ebiec and M

    T. D˛ ebiec and M. Schmidtchen. Incompressible limit fo r a two-species tumour model with coupling through Brinkman’s law in one dimension . Acta Appl. Math. , 169:593–611, 2020

    2020

  11. [19]

    Degond and F.-J

    P . Degond and F.-J. Mustieles. A deterministic approxi mation of diffusion equa- tions using particles. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing , 11(2):293– 310, 1990

    1990

  12. [20]

    Di Francesco, V

    M. Di Francesco, V . Iorio, and M. Schmidtchen. The appro ximation of the qua- dratic porous medium equation via nonlocal interacting par ticles subject to repul- sive morse potential. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.10676 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    R. J. DiPerna and P .-L. Lions. Ordinary differential equations, transport theory and Sobolev spaces. Invent. Math., 98(3):511–547, 1989

    1989

  14. [22]

    D˛ ebiec, M

    T. D˛ ebiec, M. Mandal, and M. Schmidtchen. From finite to continuous phenotypes in (visco-)elastic tissue growth models. arXiv: 2409.02904 , 2024. 18 NONLOCAL APPROXIMATION OF ANISOTROPIC DIFFUSION

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Doumic, S

    M. Doumic, S. Hecht, B. Perthame, and D. Peurichard. Mul tispecies cross- diffusions: From a nonlocal mean-field to a porous medium sys tem without self- diffusion. Journal of Differential Equations , 389:228–256, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Elbar and J

    C. Elbar and J. Skrzeczkowski. Degenerate Cahn-Hillia rd equation: from nonlocal to local. J. Differ. Equations, 364:576–611, 2023

    2023

  17. [25]

    Elbar and J

    C. Elbar and J. Skrzeczkowski. On the inviscid limit con necting Brinkman’s and Darcy’s models of tissue growth with nonlinear pressure . arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.03752, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Esposito, G

    A. Esposito, G. Heinze, and A. Schlichting. Graph-to-l ocal limit for the nonlocal interaction equation. arXiv: 2306.03475 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Esposito, F

    A. Esposito, F. S. Patacchini, A. Schlichting, and D. Sl epˇ cev . Nonlocal-interaction equation on graphs: gradient flow structure and continuum li mit. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 240(2):699–760, 2021

    2021

  20. [28]

    Figalli and R

    A. Figalli and R. Philipowski. Convergence to the visco us porous medium equa- tion and propagation of chaos. ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat. , 4:185–203, 2008

    2008

  21. [29]

    Galiano and V

    G. Galiano and V . González-Tabernero. Turing instabil ity analysis of a singular cross-diffusion problem. Electronic Journal of Differential Equations , 2021(55):1–17, 2021

    2021

  22. [30]

    Gibelli, editor

    L. Gibelli, editor. Crowd Dynamics, Volume 2. Theory, models, and applications . Model. Simul. Sci. Eng. Technol. Cham: Birkhäuser, 2020

    2020

  23. [31]

    Gibelli and N

    L. Gibelli and N. Bellomo, editors. Crowd dynamics, Volume 1. Theory, models, and safety problems. Model. Simul. Sci. Eng. Technol. Cham: Birkhäuser, 2018

    2018

  24. [32]

    M. E. Gurtin and A. C. Pipkin. A note on interacting popul ations that disperse to avoid crowding. Q. Appl. Math., 42:87–94, 1984

    1984

  25. [33]

    Gwiazda, B

    P . Gwiazda, B. Perthame, and A. ´Swierczewska-Gwiazda. A two-species hyperbolic–parabolic model of tissue growth. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 44(12):1605–1618, 2019

    2019

  26. [34]

    Hillen and A

    T. Hillen and A. Buttenschön. Nonlocal adhesion models for microorganisms on bounded domains. SIAM J. Appl. Math. , 80(1):382–401, 2020

    2020

  27. [35]

    M. Jacobs. Non-mixing lagrangian solutions to the mult ispecies porous media equation. ArXiv Preprint, arXiv:2208.01792 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    M. Jacobs. Existence of solutions to reaction cross dif fusion systems. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , 55(6):6991–7023, 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    Jüngel, M

    A. Jüngel, M. V etter, and A. Zurek. A nonlocal regulariz ation of a generalized Busenberg-Travis cross-diffusion system. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.01123 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    P .-L. Lions. Mathematical topics in fluid mechanics. Vol. 1 , volume 3 of Oxford Lecture Series in Mathematics and its Applications . The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 1996. Incompressible models, Oxford Scien ce Publications

    1996

  31. [39]

    Lions and S

    P .-L. Lions and S. Mas-Gallic. Une méthode particulair e déterministe pour des équations diffusives non linéaires. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences - Series I - Mathematics , 332(4):369–376, 2001

    2001

  32. [40]

    Liu and X

    J.-G. Liu and X. Xu. Existence and incompressible limit of a tissue growth model with autophagy . SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , 53(5), 2021

    2021

  33. [41]

    Mimura, R

    M. Mimura, R. Dal Passo, and M. Bertsch. A free boundary p roblem arising in a simplified tumour growth model of contact inhibition. Interfaces and Free Bound- aries, 12(2):235–250, 2010

    2010

  34. [42]

    Murakawa and H

    H. Murakawa and H. Togashi. Continuous models for cell– cell adhesion. Journal of theoretical biology, 374:1–12, 2015. NONLOCAL APPROXIMATION OF ANISOTROPIC DIFFUSION 19

    2015

  35. [43]

    Oelschläger

    K. Oelschläger. Large systems of interacting particle s and the porous medium equation. J. Differ. Equations, 88(2):294–346, 1990

    1990

  36. [44]

    Oelschläger

    K. Oelschläger. A sequence of integro-differential eq uations approximating a vis- cous porous medium equation. Z. Anal. Anwendungen, 20(1):55–91, 2001

    2001

  37. [45]

    K. J. Painter, T. Hillen, and J. R. Potts. Biological mod eling with nonlocal advection- diffusion equations. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. , 34(1):57–107, 2024

    2024

  38. [46]

    Philipowski

    R. Philipowski. Interacting diffusions approximatin g the porous medium equation and propagation of chaos. Stochastic Process. Appl., 117(4):526–538, 2007

    2007

  39. [47]

    B. C. Price and X. Xu. Global existence theorem for a mode l governing the motion of two cell populations. Kinetic and Related Models , 13(6):1175–1191, 2020

    2020

  40. [48]

    V olkening and B

    A. V olkening and B. Sandstede. Modelling stripe format ion in zebrafish: an agent- based approach. Journal of The Royal Society Interface , 12(112), 2015

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.