Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 8 minor 1 cited by

Inhomogeneous 2D Navier--Stokes equations: Existence, uniqueness, stability, continuity in time and energy conservation of weak solutions

T0 review · 3 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The inhomogeneous 2D Navier–Stokes equations with no vacuum admit a unique Leray–Hopf weak solution that conserves energy and is globally stable in $L^2$.

desk verdict A serious, mostly convincing resolution of Lions' uniqueness problem for 2D inhomogeneous Navier-Stokes without vacuum, but the central uniform regularity bound for mollified data is imported from partly unpublished sources. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.16638 v2 pith:Q2KYVZOE submitted 2025-04-23 math.AP

Stefan Škondrić This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35Q3076D0335A0135A0235B65
keywords inhomogeneousNavier-StokesequationsLeray-Hopfweaksolutionsuniquenessrelativeenergymethodconservationnovacuumtwodimensionsstabilityestimates
topics Navier-Stokes Regularity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that the two-dimensional incompressible Navier–Stokes equations with variable density—provided the density is bounded above and below away from zero—have one and only one Leray–Hopf weak solution for every square-integrable divergence-free initial velocity. The unique solution becomes strong immediately after the initial time, depends continuously on time in $L^2$, and satisfies the full energy equality rather than only an energy inequality. The argument also yields a global-in-time stability estimate of the form $\sup_t \|u-v\|_2^2 + \nu \int \|\nabla(u-v)\|_2^2 \le C\|u_0-v_0\|_2^2$ between any two such solutions. This matters because uniqueness of weak solutions for density-dependent fluids, sometimes called Lions' problem, had remained open in the Leray–Hopf class, and energy conservation was previously unknown.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tool is the relative energy method combined with a $W^{-1,4}$ estimate on the density difference. For two solutions with the same initial density but different velocities, the density difference $\delta\rho$ satisfies the transport equation $\partial_t\delta\rho + \operatorname{div}(\delta\rho\,u_2) = -\operatorname{div}(\rho_1\delta u)$; Proposition 3.11 bounds the pairing $\langle\delta\rho(s),\varphi\rangle$ by an integral of $\|\sqrt{\rho_1}\,\delta u\|_2^{1/2}\|\nabla\varphi\|_{4/3}$ times an exponential factor $\exp(\|(\rho,u)\|_Z\,|\ln(s/\tau)|^{1/2})\|\nabla\delta u\|_2^{1/2}$. This replaces the classical Lipschitz requirement on the velocity with the weaker weighted bound $K_0=\int s\|\nabla u_2\|_\infty^2\,ds<\infty$, which holds for immediately strong solutions. Lemma A.4 then shows the resulting integral operator is bounded on $L^p$, so Grönwall's inequality closes the stability estimate uniformly in the regularization parameter.

What would settle it

Take a fixed initial velocity and smooth it at finer and finer scales, then measure the energy distance between consecutive smoothed evolutions; if those distances decay slower than the square of the distance between the smoothed initial data, or if the size of the smoothed evolutions grows without bound, the paper's stability estimate fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes Theorem 2.1: for initial data satisfying $0<c_0\le\rho_0\le C_0$ almost everywhere and $u_0\in L^2_\sigma(\mathbb{R}^2)$, there exists a unique global Leray–Hopf weak solution $(\rho,u)$ of the inhomogeneous incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. This solution is immediately strong in the sense of Definition 2.4, satisfies $\rho u, \sqrt{\rho}\,u$ and $u$ in $C([0,\infty);L^2)$, conserves energy, and obeys the stability estimate (2.1) against any other Leray–Hopf solution. In particular, two Leray–Hopf solutions with the same initial velocity and density coincide for all times, so uniqueness holds in the full Leray–Hopf class.

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes that smoothing the initial velocity slightly produces solutions whose size stays under a uniform bound no matter how fine the smoothing is, and that the density never touches zero; if either assumption fails, the argument that the smoothed solutions converge to a true solution breaks down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any initial data satisfying (1.3), the constructed Leray–Hopf solution is the unique one: two Leray–Hopf solutions with the same initial velocity and density coincide for all times.
  • The unique solution satisfies the energy equality, not just the energy inequality, so no energy is lost in the weak formulation.
  • Global-in-time stability holds: the map from initial velocity to the entire time evolution is Lipschitz continuous in the energy space $E$, with constant depending only on $c_0,C_0,\nu,\|u_0\|_2$.
  • The solution becomes strong immediately after the initial time, with the weighted quantities $A^0_0,A^0_1,A^0_2$ finite; in particular, the velocity has an integrable weighted Lipschitz bound $\int s\|\nabla u\|_\infty^2\,ds<\infty$.
  • The density-weighted quantities $\rho u$ and $\sqrt{\rho}\,u$, as well as $u$ itself, are continuous in time with values in $L^2$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One testable extension is to push the same relative-energy scheme to densities that are merely nonnegative: the no-vacuum condition enters only through the factor $c_0$ used to drop $\sqrt{\rho}$ factors, so a renormalized density formulation might remove it without changing the $W^{-1,4}$ core.
  • The stability estimate is strong enough to suggest the solution map is globally Lipschitz from $L^2_\sigma$ into the energy space $E$; if true, this would imply well-posedness in the Hadamard sense and could be used to compare statistical or measure-valued solutions of the equation.
  • The proof's dependence on Proposition 2.6 could be bypassed if one could prove uniform $Z$-bounds directly for the smoothed system; the rest of the machinery would then transfer to other density-dependent models, such as variable-viscosity fluids or the inhomogeneous Navier–Stokes equations with temperature.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 8 minor

Summary. This paper studies the two-dimensional inhomogeneous incompressible Navier–Stokes system (1.1) with initial density bounded above and below by positive constants and initial velocity in L^2_sigma(R^2). The main result (Theorem 2.1) asserts that there is a unique global Leray–Hopf weak solution, that this solution is immediately strong in the sense of Definition 2.4, that it satisfies the energy equality (1.2), and that it obeys the stability estimate (2.1) with respect to any other Leray–Hopf solution with the same initial density. The strategy is to mollify the initial velocity, use imported well-posedness and regularity results for H^1 data to obtain approximate solutions (ρ_n,u_n), prove via the relative energy method and W^{-1,4}-stability estimates that (u_n) is Cauchy in the energy space E, pass to the limit, and then compare the limit with an arbitrary Leray–Hopf solution to obtain uniqueness and stability.

Significance. If the proof is completed as intended, the result resolves the uniqueness question for Leray–Hopf solutions (Lions' problem) in this no-vacuum two-dimensional setting, and it adds a global-in-time stability estimate and energy equality that appear to be new. The relative-energy/W^{-1,4} approach to existence is a genuine methodological novelty, and the detailed transport and weighted-integral estimates (Lemmas 3.10, A.2–A.4, Proposition 3.6) are carefully presented. The paper is not machine-checked, but the analytic structure is coherent and the main line of the argument is recognizable from the cited weak–strong uniqueness literature. The principal caveat is that the construction of the approximating sequence depends on a composite imported regularity and energy bound (Proposition 2.6 together with the A_1/A_2 estimates from [13]) that is not proved or precisely quoted in the manuscript; the uniform-in-n version of that bound is load-bearing at several steps. The result is significant and plausible, but the manuscript is not yet fully self-contained at that point.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Proposition 2.6 and the paragraph following it] The Cauchy-sequence proof of Proposition 2.5 rests on the uniform-in-n bound ||(ρ_n,u_n)||_Z ≤ f(||u_0||_2), but Proposition 2.6 as stated gives only the E-bound ||(ρ,u)||_E ≤ f(||u_0||_2). The sharper Z-bound is imported from [13, Section 2] (a paper 'to appear') and from [8] (an arXiv preprint) through the displayed A_1/A_2 estimates. This Z-bound is used at multiple load-bearing places: in (4.3)–(4.4) to make the constants independent of n and m, in Lemma 3.10 to control the flow Jacobian by exp(||(ρ,u)||_Z |ln(s/τ)|^{1/2}), and in Lemma 3.9 to obtain the regularity (3.3). The dependence of the imported A_1/A_2 bounds on the data is not reproduced: in particular, since the mollified initial velocities u_0^n are only bounded in L^2, the constants must be independent of ||u_0^n||_{H^1}. If the [13] bounds carry any H^1 dependence, the uniform Gronwall estimate (4.5) and the Cauchy property of (u_n) in E collapse. Please either prove the Z-bound for the mollified solutions or quote the exact theorem(s) from [13] and [8] and verify explicitly that the constants depend only on c_0, C_0, ν, and ||u_0||_2.
  2. [Section 3, Definition 2.4 and Lemma 3.10] In the definition of A_2^0 in (2.2), the second time integral is written as ∫_0^∞ s^2(|B_s∇u|^2 + |∇9u|) dx ds, with |∇9u| not squared and no L^2 norm indicated. Lemma 3.10 and the subsequent estimates use ∫ s^2 ||∇9u||_2^2 dτ, and the uniform Z-bound is used in (4.3)–(4.4) and in Proposition 3.11. As written, A_2^0 does not control the quantity actually used in Lemma 3.10. Please correct the definition (the intended term is presumably |∇9u|^2) and check that all later uses of the Z-norm are consistent with the corrected definition.
  3. [Section 4, proof of Proposition 2.5, passage to the limit] After obtaining u_n → u in E and ρ_n *→ ρ, the proof states that 'all bounds appearing in the definition of ||·||_Z are preserved' and concludes that the limit is immediately strong. This is not immediate and should be spelled out: one needs to extract weak limits of B_t u_n, ∇^2 u_n, and ∇P_n in the appropriate weighted L^2 spaces, identify these limits from the momentum equation, and justify the lower semicontinuity of each term A_0^0, A_0^1, A_0^2. The passage in the kinetic energy (4.8) also deserves one sentence: it uses u_n(t) → u(t) in L^2 and ρ_n(t) *→ ρ(t) in L^∞, together with |u(t)|^2 ∈ L^1. Please add the compactness and identification argument so that the immediately-strong property and the energy equality of the limit are fully verified.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Section 2, Proposition 2.6] Proposition 2.6 states that the solution satisfies the energy inequality, but the subsequent paragraph and the proof of Proposition 2.5 use the energy equality, citing [8, Lemma 2.9]. Please make the statement of Proposition 2.6 consistent with the results used later.
  2. [Section 3, proof of Proposition 3.11] In the proof of Proposition 3.11, the bound for ||DX(s,τ)||_∞ is attributed to 'Lemma 3.9' and uses ||(ρ,u)||_E, but the correct reference is Lemma 3.10 and the norm should be ||(ρ,u)||_Z, as in the statement (3.18). Please correct the reference and the norm.
  3. [Section 3, proof of Proposition 3.11] The displayed identity after the change of variables has a sign error: after integration by parts, the term involving div(ρ_1 δu)_γ should carry a minus sign, not a plus sign. The final absolute-value bound is unaffected, but the displayed identity should be corrected.
  4. [Section 4, equation (4.3)] In (4.3), the test function φ is written as '9u_n(s) δ_m^n(s)'; this should be the scalar product 9u_n(s)·δ_m^n(s). Also, in (4.4), the factor √ρ_m is dropped by using (4.2); the constant should be c_0^{-1/2} rather than C_0 if the comparison is made via ||√ρ_m δu||_2 ≥ √c_0 ||δu||_2.
  5. [Appendix A, Lemma A.4] The statement says 'there is an L = L(p,C), which is independent of C and t'; this is contradictory since L is allowed to depend on C. The intended meaning is presumably that L depends on p and C but not on t or f. Please correct the wording.
  6. [Section 2, paragraph after Proposition 2.6] The sentence 'From here it is easy to find an explicit representation of the desired function f' is too terse: since Proposition 2.6 only states the E-bound, the Z-bound should either be incorporated into Proposition 2.6 or proved explicitly, with the monotone function f redefined accordingly.
  7. [Section 3, proof of Lemma 3.9] The proof uses the assertion 'ess sup_{t≥ε} ||u(t)||_{H^2}' without derivation; this follows from A_2^0 and u ∈ L^∞_t L^2_x, but a sentence explaining the argument would help the reader.
  8. [Section 4, proof of Proposition 2.5, energy equality] When passing to the limit in the energy equality, the text cites 'Lemma A.1 (i) and by what was done before'; more precision is needed. The convergence of the kinetic energy follows from u_n(t) → u(t) in L^2 and ρ_n(t) *→ ρ(t) in L^∞ with |u(t)|^2 ∈ L^1, and this should be stated explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction of the main claim; the proof is a genuine relative-energy construction, though it leans heavily on imported and self-cited regularity lemmas that do not assume the target L2 uniqueness result.

full rationale

The central claim (Theorem 2.1) is not assumed as an input. The proof starts from H1-regularized initial data and uses Proposition 2.6 only to obtain existence, uniqueness, energy equality, and Z-bounds for the mollified problems. The Cauchy argument in Proposition 2.5 then derives, via the relative-energy identity (4.1) (attributed to [9, Lemma 4.1]) and the W^{-1,4} estimate (3.18), a uniform-in-n stability estimate (2.12). This is a derivation, not a restatement of the input: the final L2-data Leray–Hopf solution is obtained as the limit of mollified strong solutions, and the uniqueness/stability estimate (2.1) follows by applying the same estimate with an arbitrary Leray–Hopf solution in place of the mollified strong solution. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no equation is shown to be identical to another by construction. The acknowledged reliance on [29], [9], [8], and [13] is real and load-bearing: in particular, the uniform Z-bound ||(rho_n,u_n)||_Z <= f(||u0||_2) used at (4.3)-(4.4) is imported from [13, Section 2], and the no-vacuum propagation (4.2) and the relative-energy identity are imported from [9] and [8]. These include self-citations ([9] and [8] are co-authored by the present author), but they are cited as prior results with different hypotheses (smoother data, weak-strong uniqueness framework) and do not include the paper's L2 Leray–Hopf uniqueness theorem as an assumption. The self-citation therefore raises a provenance and verifiability concern—especially since [8] is an arXiv preprint and [13] is 'to appear'—but it does not make the derivation circular. The abstract's 'for the first time' energy-conservation claim is also questionable in view of [8, Lemma 2.9], but overclaiming novelty is not a circularity defect.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central proof is built on a scaffold of prior results, including two papers co-authored by the author ([8], [9]) and two recent preprints ([13], [20]). These supply the immediate-strong regularity, the relative energy identity, and no-vacuum propagation. They are unproved in the present text; the author's contribution is the approximation argument and the synthesis of these ingredients into uniqueness and stability.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Initial density bounded away from zero and infinity: 0 < c0 <= rho0 <= C0 < infinity a.e. (assumption (1.3)).
    This no-vacuum condition is the standing assumption of the paper; it is used to define the energy space, to drop sqrt(rho) factors in estimates (e.g., (4.2)), and to apply the no-vacuum propagation result [9, Thm 1.8].
  • domain assumption Propagation of no-vacuum: Leray-Hopf weak solutions from no-vacuum data satisfy c0 <= rho(t) <= C0 for all t > 0 ([9, Theorem 1.8]).
    Invoked in Remark 2.3 and again in Section 4 to justify (4.2), which is essential for the relative energy estimates.
  • domain assumption Existence of unique immediately strong solutions for H1 data with uniform bounds (Proposition 2.6, compiled from [29, Thm 1.1], [9, Thm 1.6], [8, Lemma 2.9], [13, Section 2]).
    This is the main black box: it provides the approximating sequence (rho_n, u_n), its energy equality, and the uniform Z-norm bound ||(rho_n, u_n)||_Z <= f(||u0||_2) used throughout Section 4.
  • domain assumption Relative energy inequality for weak-strong pairs ([9, Lemma 4.1]).
    Equation (4.1), the starting point of the stability estimate, is imported from [9]; it requires the 'strong' solution to be regular enough (here (rho_n, u_n)) and the other solution to be a Leray-Hopf solution.
  • domain assumption Immediately strong velocity satisfies integral_0^t s ||grad u(s)||_infinity^2 ds < infinity and structure (3.3) (from [13, Prop. 3.2] and Lemma 3.9).
    This bound (K0) replaces the classical Lipschitz assumption and is the cornerstone of the W^{-1,4} estimates; it is inherited from the Z-norm via the cited theory.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Inhomogeneous 2D Navier--Stokes equations: Existence, uniqueness, stability, continuity in time and energy conservation of weak solutions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Q2KYVZOE

@misc{pith2026250416638,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Inhomogeneous 2D Navier--Stokes equations: Existence, uniqueness, stability, continuity in time and energy conservation of weak solutions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Q2KYVZOE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.16638}
}
read the original abstract

We present a novel and direct proof of the existence and uniqueness of weak solutions of the inhomogeneous incompressible Navier--Stokes equations without vacuum. The analysis we employ to prove the strong convergence of the approximating sequence, which is based on the relative energy method, reveals how to conclude the stability and uniqueness of weak solutions. To the best of our knowledge, these global-in-time stability estimates are completely new. Furthermore, for the first time, we establish energy conservation for weak solutions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. $L^2(\mathbb{R}^2)$ Well-Posedness and Logarithmic Lipschitz Regularity for the Density Patch Problem

    math.AP 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    L2 density patches for 2D inhomogeneous Navier-Stokes are uniquely well-posed and the velocity is log-Lipschitz, so the interface keeps Hausdorff dimension 1 forever.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [20]

    Global well-posedness of inhomo- geneous Navier-Stokes equations with bounded density

    Tiantian Hao, Feng Shao, Dongyi Wei, and Zhifei Zhang. Global well-posedness of inhomo- geneous Navier-Stokes equations with bounded density . 2024. arXiv: 2406.19907 [math.AP] . url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.19907

    arXiv 2024

  2. [13]

    Global well-posedness for 2D inhomo geneous viscous flows with rough data via dynamic interpolation

    Raphaël Danchin. “Global well-posedness for 2D inhomo geneous viscous flows with rough data via dynamic interpolation”. In: Anal. PDE (2024). To appear

    work page 2024

  3. [8]

    Regularity aspects of Leray-Hopf solutions to the 2D Inhomogeneous Navier-Stokes system and applications to weak-strong uniqueness

    Timothée Crin-Barat, Nicola De Nitti, Stefan Škondrić, and Alessandro Violini. Regularity as- pects of Leray-Hopf solutions to the 2D Inhomogeneous Navier- Stokes system and applications to weak-strong uniqueness. 2024. arXiv: 2412.13828 [math.AP] . url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13828

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  4. [1]

    Navier-Stokes equation with variable d ensity and viscosity in critical space

    Hammadi Abidi. “Navier-Stokes equation with variable d ensity and viscosity in critical space”. French. In: Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 23.2 (2007), pp. 537–586. issn: 0213-2230. doi: 10.4171/RMI/505. url: https://eudml.org/doc/43605

    work page doi:10.4171/rmi/505 2007

  5. [2]

    Global well-posedness f or the 2 -D inhomogeneous incom- pressible Navier-Stokes system with large initial data in c ritical spaces

    Hammadi Abidi and Guilong Gui. “Global well-posedness f or the 2 -D inhomogeneous incom- pressible Navier-Stokes system with large initial data in c ritical spaces”. In: Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 242.3 (2021), pp. 1533–1570. issn: 0003-9527. doi: 10.1007/s00205-021-01710-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s00205-021-01710-y 2021

  6. [3]

    On the globa l existence and uniqueness of so- lution to 2-D inhomogeneous incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in critical spaces

    Hammadi Abidi, Guilong Gui, and Ping Zhang. “On the globa l existence and uniqueness of so- lution to 2-D inhomogeneous incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in critical spaces”. Eng- lish. In: J. Differ. Equations 406 (2024), pp. 126–173. issn: 0022-0396. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2024.06.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jde.2024.06.004 2024

  7. [4]

    Mucha, and Maja Szlenk

    Jean-Paul Adogbo, Piotr B. Mucha, and Maja Szlenk. Inhomogenous Navier–Stokes equations with unbounded density. 2024. arXiv: 2411.05438 [math.AP] . url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.05438

    arXiv 2024

  8. [5]

    Continuity equati ons and ODE flows with non-smooth velocity

    Luigi Ambrosio and Gianluca Crippa. “Continuity equati ons and ODE flows with non-smooth velocity”. English. In: Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Sect. A, Math. 144.6 (2014), pp. 1191–1244. issn: 0308-2105. doi: 10.1017/S0308210513000085

    doi:10.1017/s0308210513000085 2014

Show all 35 references
  1. [6]

    Fourier analysis and nonlinear par- tial differential equations

    Hajer Bahouri, Jean-Yves Chemin, and Raphaël Danchin. Fourier analysis and nonlinear par- tial differential equations. Vol. 343. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Funda- mental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]. Springer, He idelberg, 2011, pp. xvi+523. isbn: 97...

    2011 doi

  2. [7]

    Fujita- Kato theorem for the 3-D inhomo- geneous Navier-Stokes equations

    Dongxiang Chen, Zhifei Zhang, and Weiren Zhao. “Fujita- Kato theorem for the 3-D inhomo- geneous Navier-Stokes equations”. In: J. Differ. Equations 261.1 (2016), pp. 738–761. issn: 0022-0396. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2016.03.024

    2016 doi

  3. [9]

    Relative energy method for weak–strong uniqueness of the inhomogeneous Navier–Stoke s equations far from vacuum

    Timothée Crin-Barat, Stefan Škondrić, and Alessandro V iolini. “Relative energy method for weak–strong uniqueness of the inhomogeneous Navier–Stoke s equations far from vacuum”. In: J. Evol. Equ. 25.1 (2025), Paper No. 6. issn: 1424-3199. doi: 10.1007/s00028-024-01036-8 . url:...

    2025 doi

  4. [10]

    The flow associated to weakly differen tiable vector fields

    Gianluca Crippa. “The flow associated to weakly differen tiable vector fields”. PhD thesis. Universität Zürich, 2008. url: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-163873

    2008 doi

  5. [11]

    Density-dependent indecompressible vis cous fluids in critical spaces

    R. Danchin. “Density-dependent indecompressible vis cous fluids in critical spaces”. In: Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Sect. A, Math. 133.6 (2003), pp. 1311–1334. issn: 0308-2105. doi: 10.1017/S030821050000295X

    2003 doi

  6. [12]

    Local and global well-posedness results f or flows of inhomogeneous viscous fluids

    R. Danchin. “Local and global well-posedness results f or flows of inhomogeneous viscous fluids”. In: Adv. Differ. Equ. 9.3-4 (2004), pp. 353–386. issn: 1079-9389

    2004

  7. [14]

    Incompress ible flows with piecewise constant density

    Raphaël Danchin and Piotr BogusŁaw Mucha. “Incompress ible flows with piecewise constant density”. In: Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 207.3 (2013), pp. 991–1023. issn: 0003-9527. doi: 10.1007/s00205-012-0586-4

    2013 doi

  8. [15]

    A Lagrangia n approach for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with variable density

    Raphaël Danchin and Piotr Bogusław Mucha. “A Lagrangia n approach for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with variable density”. English. In: Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 65.10 (2012), pp. 1458–1480. issn: 0010-3640. doi: 10.1002/cpa.21409

    2012 doi

  9. [16]

    The incompr essible Navier-Stokes equations in vacuum

    Raphaël Danchin and Piotr Bogusław Mucha. “The incompr essible Navier-Stokes equations in vacuum”. In: Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 72.7 (2019), pp. 1351–1385. issn: 0010-3640. doi: 10.1002/cpa.21806

    2019 doi

  10. [17]

    Global unique solution s for the inhomogeneous Navier- Stokes equations with only bounded density, in critical reg ularity spaces

    Raphaël Danchin and Shan Wang. “Global unique solution s for the inhomogeneous Navier- Stokes equations with only bounded density, in critical reg ularity spaces”. In: Comm. Math. Phys. 399.3 (2023), pp. 1647–1688. issn: 0010-3616. doi: 10.1007/s00220-022-04592-7 . url: https:...

    2023 doi

  11. [18]

    Linear transport equations with i nitial values in Sobolev spaces and ap- plication to the Navier-Stokes equations

    Benoit Desjardins. “Linear transport equations with i nitial values in Sobolev spaces and ap- plication to the Navier-Stokes equations”. In: Differential and Integral Equations 10.3 (1997), pp. 577–586. doi: 10.57262/die/1367525668. url: https://doi.org/10.57262/die/1367525668....

    1997

  12. [19]

    Ordinary differential eq uations, transport theory and Sobolev spaces

    R. J. DiPerna and P.-L. Lions. “Ordinary differential eq uations, transport theory and Sobolev spaces”. In: Invent. Math. 98.3 (1989), pp. 511–547. issn: 0020-9910,1432-1297. doi: 10.1007/BF01393835. url: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01393835

    1989 doi

  13. [22]

    Solvability of theinitial and boundary -value problem for the equations of motions of an inhomogeneous viscous incompressible fluid

    A. V. Kažihov. “Solvability of theinitial and boundary -value problem for the equations of motions of an inhomogeneous viscous incompressible fluid”. In: Sov. Phys., Dokl. 19 (1974), pp. 331–332. issn: 0038-5689

    1974

  14. [23]

    The unique sol vability of an initial-boundary value problem for viscous incompressible inhomogeneous fluids

    O. A. Ladyženskaja and V. A. Solonnikov. “The unique sol vability of an initial-boundary value problem for viscous incompressible inhomogeneous fluids”. In: Zap. Naučn. Sem. Leningrad. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (LOMI) 52 (1975), pp. 52–109, 218–219

    1975

  15. [24]

    Solution “in the large

    O. A. Ladyzhenskaya. “Solution “in the large” of the non stationary boundary value problem for the Navier-Stokes system with two space variables”. In: Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 12 (1959), pp. 427–433. issn: 0010-3640. doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160120303

    1959 doi

  16. [25]

    On the movement of a space-filling viscous l iquid

    Jean Leray. “On the movement of a space-filling viscous l iquid”. In: Acta Math. 63 (1934), pp. 193–248. issn: 0001-5962. doi: 10.1007/BF02547354

    1934 doi

  17. [26]

    Un théorème d ’existence et unicité dans les équa- tions de Navier- Stokes en dimension 2

    Jacques-Louis Lions and Giovanni Prodi. “Un théorème d ’existence et unicité dans les équa- tions de Navier- Stokes en dimension 2”. In: C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris 248 (1959), pp. 3519–

    1959

  18. [27]

    Mathematical topics in fluid mechanics

    Pierre-Louis Lions. Mathematical topics in fluid mechanics. Vol. 1: Incompressib le models . Vol. 3. Oxford Lecture Series in Mathematics and its Applica tions. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 1996, pp. xiv+237. isbn: 0-19-851487-5

    1996

  19. [28]

    WEAK SOLUTIONS OF NA VIER-STOKES EQUATIONS

    K. Masuda. “WEAK SOLUTIONS OF NA VIER-STOKES EQUATIONS ”. In: Tôhoku Math. Journ. 36 (1984), pp. 623–646

    1984

  20. [29]

    Global uni que solvability of inhomogeneous Navier-Stokes equations with bounded density

    Marius Paicu, Ping Zhang, and Zhifei Zhang. “Global uni que solvability of inhomogeneous Navier-Stokes equations with bounded density”. In: Commun. Partial Differ. Equations 38.7- 9 (2013), pp. 1208–1234. issn: 0360-5302. doi: 10.1080/03605302.2013.780079

    2013

  21. [30]

    Free boundary regularity of vacuum states for incompressible viscous flows in unbounded domains

    Christophe Prange and Jin Tan. Free boundary regularity of vacuum states for incompressible viscous flows in unbounded domains . Preprint, arXiv:2310.09288 [math.AP] (2023). 2023. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.09288

    2023 arXiv

  22. [31]

    Nonhomogeneous viscous incompressib le fluids: existence of velocity, density, and pressure

    Jacques Simon. “Nonhomogeneous viscous incompressib le fluids: existence of velocity, density, and pressure”. In: SIAM J. Math. Anal. 21.5 (1990), pp. 1093–1117. issn: 0036-1410. doi: 10.1137/0521061. url: https://doi.org/10.1137/0521061

    1990 doi

  23. [32]

    Weak-strong uniqueness in fluid dynam ics

    Emil Wiedemann. “Weak-strong uniqueness in fluid dynam ics”. English. In: Partial differen- tial equations in fluid mechanics. Based on the workshop “PDEs in Fluid Mechanics”, War- wick, UK, September 26–30, 2016 . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, pp. 289–

    2016

  24. [33]

    Maximal L1 regularity for solutions to inhomogeneous incompressible Navier- Stokes equations

    Huan Xu. “Maximal L1 regularity for solutions to inhomogeneous incompressible Navier- Stokes equations”. In: Journal of Differential Equations 335 (2022), pp. 1–42. issn: 0022-0396. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2022.07.008. url: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article

    2022 doi

  25. [34]

    Global Fujita-Kato solution of 3-d inhomo geneous incompressible Navier-Stokes system

    Ping Zhang. “Global Fujita-Kato solution of 3-d inhomo geneous incompressible Navier-Stokes system”. In: Adv. Math. 363 (2020). Id/No 107007, p. 43. issn: 0001-8708. doi: 10.1016/j.aim.2020.107007. (S. Škondrić) Friedrich-Alexander-Universitä t Erlangen-Nürnberg, De partment o...

    2020

  26. [326]

    doi: 10.1017/9781108610575.012

    isbn: 978-1-108-46096-5; 978-1-139-10711-2. doi: 10.1017/9781108610575.012

    doi

  27. [2024]

    url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07984

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.